<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aww: House GOP swoons over Obama after stimulus meeting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/27/aww-house-gop-swoons-over-obama-after-stimulus-meeting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/27/aww-house-gop-swoons-over-obama-after-stimulus-meeting/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 04:19:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Wide Awake Cafe &#187; Eight Days of Silence</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/27/aww-house-gop-swoons-over-obama-after-stimulus-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-1824209</link>
		<dc:creator>The Wide Awake Cafe &#187; Eight Days of Silence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41992#comment-1824209</guid>
		<description>[...] nemesis. Nancy Pelosi&#8217;s been put in her place, Biden&#8217;s had a few forelocks plucked and some Republicans, in the senate, in their desire to please the great Obama seem to want to belong to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nemesis. Nancy Pelosi&#8217;s been put in her place, Biden&#8217;s had a few forelocks plucked and some Republicans, in the senate, in their desire to please the great Obama seem to want to belong to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RBO News &#38; Views&#8211;The Carnival of the Absurd Edition &#171;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/27/aww-house-gop-swoons-over-obama-after-stimulus-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-1820813</link>
		<dc:creator>RBO News &#38; Views&#8211;The Carnival of the Absurd Edition &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41992#comment-1820813</guid>
		<description>[...] at Hot Air reports House GOP swoons over Obama after stimulus meeting: This would be the same meeting at which The One told them to get bent if they think he’s going [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at Hot Air reports House GOP swoons over Obama after stimulus meeting: This would be the same meeting at which The One told them to get bent if they think he’s going [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PFB Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why Can&#8217;t I Hope That Obama Fails?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/27/aww-house-gop-swoons-over-obama-after-stimulus-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-1820370</link>
		<dc:creator>PFB Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why Can&#8217;t I Hope That Obama Fails?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 03:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41992#comment-1820370</guid>
		<description>[...] This is what we don&#8217;t need:  Rep. Bob Inglis (R-S.C.) said that Obama was sincere and “impressive” during his meeting with Republicans Tuesday afternoon.“There’s real desire in this room to figure a way back to prosperity,” Inglis wrote on Twitter. “[The president] and Republicans here [are] expressing deep concern about unemployment.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is what we don&#8217;t need:  Rep. Bob Inglis (R-S.C.) said that Obama was sincere and “impressive” during his meeting with Republicans Tuesday afternoon.“There’s real desire in this room to figure a way back to prosperity,” Inglis wrote on Twitter. “[The president] and Republicans here [are] expressing deep concern about unemployment.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cr4sh Dummy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/27/aww-house-gop-swoons-over-obama-after-stimulus-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-1820025</link>
		<dc:creator>Cr4sh Dummy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41992#comment-1820025</guid>
		<description>Conservatives need to take back the Republican party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservatives need to take back the Republican party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JDScott</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/27/aww-house-gop-swoons-over-obama-after-stimulus-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-1819661</link>
		<dc:creator>JDScott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41992#comment-1819661</guid>
		<description>Allahpundit,

I&#039;d suggest following some of the links in the Hill story. While the GOP lawmakers are certainly smiling for the cameras I&#039;d suggest that your post on &quot;The Hill Blog&quot; can focus more on the Media swoon for Obama.

From the Congressman who stated: &quot;Very respectful interchange. Sharp differences are muted.&quot; Here are some more
&quot;Obama&#039;s new philosophy of governance has not been followed with this stimulus bill. But maybe that is by design.&quot;

Is that really a swoon. I&#039;m guessing anything but straight out insults will be viewed as a swoon by the media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allahpundit,</p>
<p>I&#8217;d suggest following some of the links in the Hill story. While the GOP lawmakers are certainly smiling for the cameras I&#8217;d suggest that your post on &#8220;The Hill Blog&#8221; can focus more on the Media swoon for Obama.</p>
<p>From the Congressman who stated: &#8220;Very respectful interchange. Sharp differences are muted.&#8221; Here are some more<br />
&#8220;Obama&#8217;s new philosophy of governance has not been followed with this stimulus bill. But maybe that is by design.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is that really a swoon. I&#8217;m guessing anything but straight out insults will be viewed as a swoon by the media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PattyJ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/27/aww-house-gop-swoons-over-obama-after-stimulus-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-1819638</link>
		<dc:creator>PattyJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41992#comment-1819638</guid>
		<description>&quot;He&#039;s so dreamy!&quot;

Overheard in the cloakroom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;He&#8217;s so dreamy!&#8221;</p>
<p>Overheard in the cloakroom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onlineanalyst</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/27/aww-house-gop-swoons-over-obama-after-stimulus-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-1819588</link>
		<dc:creator>onlineanalyst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41992#comment-1819588</guid>
		<description>Not only will this &quot;stimulus&quot; bill have a price tag with enormous interest debt, Rep. Waxman has included a provision that will drive up the cost of energy even further.  http://www.openmarket.org/2009/01/27/kiss-off-to-consumers/ Won&#039;t that be a lark:  paying for inflated energy costs with inflated dollars?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only will this &#8220;stimulus&#8221; bill have a price tag with enormous interest debt, Rep. Waxman has included a provision that will drive up the cost of energy even further.  <a href="http://www.openmarket.org/2009/01/27/kiss-off-to-consumers/" rel="nofollow">http://www.openmarket.org/2009/01/27/kiss-off-to-consumers/</a> Won&#8217;t that be a lark:  paying for inflated energy costs with inflated dollars?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ex-Democrat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/27/aww-house-gop-swoons-over-obama-after-stimulus-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-1819531</link>
		<dc:creator>ex-Democrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41992#comment-1819531</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Thief-in-chief.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Thief-in-chief.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onlineanalyst</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/27/aww-house-gop-swoons-over-obama-after-stimulus-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-1819502</link>
		<dc:creator>onlineanalyst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41992#comment-1819502</guid>
		<description>Banks won&#039;t unfreeze lending to small busineeses, and there will be no hires to offset the layoffs until there are cuts in the corporate tax to make us competitive in the marketplace.

There will be no capital flowing to create private sector jobs without a cut in the capital gains tax.

Public works programs on the public dime are stagnating and debt increasers.

Sorry, Obama, but the economy does not grow from the bottom up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Banks won&#8217;t unfreeze lending to small busineeses, and there will be no hires to offset the layoffs until there are cuts in the corporate tax to make us competitive in the marketplace.</p>
<p>There will be no capital flowing to create private sector jobs without a cut in the capital gains tax.</p>
<p>Public works programs on the public dime are stagnating and debt increasers.</p>
<p>Sorry, Obama, but the economy does not grow from the bottom up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IlikedAUH2O</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/27/aww-house-gop-swoons-over-obama-after-stimulus-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-1819495</link>
		<dc:creator>IlikedAUH2O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41992#comment-1819495</guid>
		<description>P. S. The fact that The One is a liberal is another powerful influence. Maybe the most powerful. But look what happened to Edwards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P. S. The fact that The One is a liberal is another powerful influence. Maybe the most powerful. But look what happened to Edwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spmat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/27/aww-house-gop-swoons-over-obama-after-stimulus-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-1819475</link>
		<dc:creator>spmat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41992#comment-1819475</guid>
		<description>Welcome to 1932 folks, in which the Republicans get comfy with being a minority party for the next 50 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to 1932 folks, in which the Republicans get comfy with being a minority party for the next 50 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IlikedAUH2O</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/27/aww-house-gop-swoons-over-obama-after-stimulus-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-1819434</link>
		<dc:creator>IlikedAUH2O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41992#comment-1819434</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Brainwashing!&lt;/strong&gt;

WHY IS THE ONE LOVED?

It is simple. Movies, books, television shows, sports events and everything else has made men who &lt;em&gt;LOOK&lt;/em&gt; like The One the ultimate hero and male sex symbol for tha past 40 years or so. I&#039;m not going to name the considerable list of stars who look like him. God bless them for their success but audiences pulled for these heros because &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;they wanted to&lt;/em&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;and that predisposition was present before a line was spoken in the film. The films also added a coolness that white heroes mostly missed with the exception of Paul Newman and the various Bonds. 

Then, to put a lock on it, look at the range of ugly, stupid whites cast in the film. Look first at films like &lt;em&gt;One Hundred Rifles&lt;/em&gt;, and &lt;em&gt;In The Heat of the Night&lt;/em&gt; for superheroes that rule, in part, because their hero, like The One, has the added mojo of white guilt, empathy and venom against the dominant culture and the national history.&lt;em&gt; Then&lt;/em&gt; you add whites as fat, rich villains or toothless rednecks while the only acceptable white male is a sidekick, a plot advancing loser or an authority figure who secretly admires the hero.

This is &lt;em&gt;MY&lt;/em&gt; explanation of the &lt;em&gt;Slobbering Love Affair &lt;/em&gt;and I am thinking of sending it to Bernie Goldberg who probably wouldn&#039;t touch my ideas with a ten foot pole. But that is another influence. I am trying to find his e-mail address as it may be amusing to explain the leg chills.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Brainwashing!</strong></p>
<p>WHY IS THE ONE LOVED?</p>
<p>It is simple. Movies, books, television shows, sports events and everything else has made men who <em>LOOK</em> like The One the ultimate hero and male sex symbol for tha past 40 years or so. I&#8217;m not going to name the considerable list of stars who look like him. God bless them for their success but audiences pulled for these heros because <strong><em>they wanted to</em> </strong>and that predisposition was present before a line was spoken in the film. The films also added a coolness that white heroes mostly missed with the exception of Paul Newman and the various Bonds. </p>
<p>Then, to put a lock on it, look at the range of ugly, stupid whites cast in the film. Look first at films like <em>One Hundred Rifles</em>, and <em>In The Heat of the Night</em> for superheroes that rule, in part, because their hero, like The One, has the added mojo of white guilt, empathy and venom against the dominant culture and the national history.<em> Then</em> you add whites as fat, rich villains or toothless rednecks while the only acceptable white male is a sidekick, a plot advancing loser or an authority figure who secretly admires the hero.</p>
<p>This is <em>MY</em> explanation of the <em>Slobbering Love Affair </em>and I am thinking of sending it to Bernie Goldberg who probably wouldn&#8217;t touch my ideas with a ten foot pole. But that is another influence. I am trying to find his e-mail address as it may be amusing to explain the leg chills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LodeStar</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/27/aww-house-gop-swoons-over-obama-after-stimulus-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-1819425</link>
		<dc:creator>LodeStar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41992#comment-1819425</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Nicholas Carpathia.

ctmom on January 27, 2009 at 3:39 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The reaction from his followers and &quot;swooners&quot; sure make me think of &quot;him&quot; and the reception &quot;he&quot; will receive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Nicholas Carpathia.</p>
<p>ctmom on January 27, 2009 at 3:39 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>The reaction from his followers and &#8220;swooners&#8221; sure make me think of &#8220;him&#8221; and the reception &#8220;he&#8221; will receive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcila</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/27/aww-house-gop-swoons-over-obama-after-stimulus-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-1819422</link>
		<dc:creator>jcila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41992#comment-1819422</guid>
		<description>Drudge has a headline stating dems are lining up to author a petition AGAINST Rush Limbaugh

(the link is so overwhelmed right now)
But if this is true this proves that the democrats
and hollywood celebrities actually believe that
American Citizens who do not AGREE with either
the messiah
or their communist agenda
are now to be labeled 
AS THE ENEMY...

Please please tell me the last time
ANY liberal labeled
Hamass
osama bin laden
mussowi
irans thug in cheif 

As the ENEMY of the United States of America
please tell me when the last that democrats 
actually STOOD up against Islamic Terrorism?

2001.. and ONLY because it was SO OBVIOUS when 3 airliners were RAMMED into the twin towers and the pentagon..

and even then democrats were quitly wineing that we shouldnt respnd too harsly

Now though since Rush and other conservatives
have not Falen in love with the messia
or pelozi the witch..

Well now we see our 
OWN MEMBERS OF CONGRESS
TARGETING A US CITIZEN
BECAUSE HE DOESNT LIKE WHAT THEY ARE DOING..

Correct me if i am wrong
but isnt that why we had the REVOLUTION????
Morons..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drudge has a headline stating dems are lining up to author a petition AGAINST Rush Limbaugh</p>
<p>(the link is so overwhelmed right now)<br />
But if this is true this proves that the democrats<br />
and hollywood celebrities actually believe that<br />
American Citizens who do not AGREE with either<br />
the messiah<br />
or their communist agenda<br />
are now to be labeled<br />
AS THE ENEMY&#8230;</p>
<p>Please please tell me the last time<br />
ANY liberal labeled<br />
Hamass<br />
osama bin laden<br />
mussowi<br />
irans thug in cheif </p>
<p>As the ENEMY of the United States of America<br />
please tell me when the last that democrats<br />
actually STOOD up against Islamic Terrorism?</p>
<p>2001.. and ONLY because it was SO OBVIOUS when 3 airliners were RAMMED into the twin towers and the pentagon..</p>
<p>and even then democrats were quitly wineing that we shouldnt respnd too harsly</p>
<p>Now though since Rush and other conservatives<br />
have not Falen in love with the messia<br />
or pelozi the witch..</p>
<p>Well now we see our<br />
OWN MEMBERS OF CONGRESS<br />
TARGETING A US CITIZEN<br />
BECAUSE HE DOESNT LIKE WHAT THEY ARE DOING..</p>
<p>Correct me if i am wrong<br />
but isnt that why we had the REVOLUTION????<br />
Morons..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onlineanalyst</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/27/aww-house-gop-swoons-over-obama-after-stimulus-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-1819383</link>
		<dc:creator>onlineanalyst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41992#comment-1819383</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t care how collegial Obama appeared to be.  In essence, Republicans are allowing the smooth talker to have a honeymoon because they are more gentlemanly than the gutter scrappers led by Nancy Pelosi.

According to that linked Politico article, Obama is adamant about using our tax code to &quot;rectify&quot; what he calls &quot;social injustice&quot; with his &quot;rebates&quot; for non-taxpayers.  This is an issue worth fighting over loudly and often in fron of the cameras for the sound bite by the opposing Republicans.  Obama is unwilling to compromise on an issue that affects those who &lt;em&gt;pay the freight for the proposed legislation&lt;/em&gt;.  Taxpayers should not be penalized in order to win Obama electoral approval by those who are not invested in growing the economy but only taking from it,
 
 
&lt;blockquote&gt;President Barack Obama rolled into the Capitol with a clear message for Republicans Tuesday afternoon: He’s happy to talk, but he’s not compromising on his tax rebates for lower income households. 

&lt;strong&gt;Obama was ready for the House Republicans to pounce, telling them: &quot;Feel free to whack me over the head because I probably will not compromise on that part [refundable tax credits],” &lt;/strong&gt;according to two sources in the room.

In the meeting, Obama acknowledged a fundamental divide between Republicans and Democrats on the issue of a tax rebates for people at the lowest income level - Republicans complain that tax cuts for people who don&#039;t pay income taxes amounts to &quot;welfare through the tax code.&quot;

House Republicans pelted Obama for more than 30 minutes with questions about deficits, taxes and spending, according to sources inside the private meeting. Rep. Kevin Brady (R-Texas), won applause from his GOP colleagues when he asked the president whether he would promise that the stimulus would not be an excuse to raise taxes or increase spending. Rep. Dave Camp (R-Mich.), asked Obama for common ground on taxes in the $825 billion package – and was rejected.

Obama responded, according to sources in the room, that&lt;strong&gt; he was worried about the deficit and debt, and promised that his fiscal 2010 budget – coming out next month – would make hard choices in terms of spending cuts in an effort to reduce the deficit&lt;/strong&gt;. And the reality is that Obama and Democrats don’t need any Republican House votes to pass the stimulus. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Shall we place bets that those &quot;hard choices&quot; will focus on cutting the budget in national security, intelligence, and the Pentagon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care how collegial Obama appeared to be.  In essence, Republicans are allowing the smooth talker to have a honeymoon because they are more gentlemanly than the gutter scrappers led by Nancy Pelosi.</p>
<p>According to that linked Politico article, Obama is adamant about using our tax code to &#8220;rectify&#8221; what he calls &#8220;social injustice&#8221; with his &#8220;rebates&#8221; for non-taxpayers.  This is an issue worth fighting over loudly and often in fron of the cameras for the sound bite by the opposing Republicans.  Obama is unwilling to compromise on an issue that affects those who <em>pay the freight for the proposed legislation</em>.  Taxpayers should not be penalized in order to win Obama electoral approval by those who are not invested in growing the economy but only taking from it,</p>
<blockquote><p>President Barack Obama rolled into the Capitol with a clear message for Republicans Tuesday afternoon: He’s happy to talk, but he’s not compromising on his tax rebates for lower income households. </p>
<p><strong>Obama was ready for the House Republicans to pounce, telling them: &#8220;Feel free to whack me over the head because I probably will not compromise on that part [refundable tax credits],” </strong>according to two sources in the room.</p>
<p>In the meeting, Obama acknowledged a fundamental divide between Republicans and Democrats on the issue of a tax rebates for people at the lowest income level &#8211; Republicans complain that tax cuts for people who don&#8217;t pay income taxes amounts to &#8220;welfare through the tax code.&#8221;</p>
<p>House Republicans pelted Obama for more than 30 minutes with questions about deficits, taxes and spending, according to sources inside the private meeting. Rep. Kevin Brady (R-Texas), won applause from his GOP colleagues when he asked the president whether he would promise that the stimulus would not be an excuse to raise taxes or increase spending. Rep. Dave Camp (R-Mich.), asked Obama for common ground on taxes in the $825 billion package – and was rejected.</p>
<p>Obama responded, according to sources in the room, that<strong> he was worried about the deficit and debt, and promised that his fiscal 2010 budget – coming out next month – would make hard choices in terms of spending cuts in an effort to reduce the deficit</strong>. And the reality is that Obama and Democrats don’t need any Republican House votes to pass the stimulus. </p></blockquote>
<p>Shall we place bets that those &#8220;hard choices&#8221; will focus on cutting the budget in national security, intelligence, and the Pentagon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ginaswo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/27/aww-house-gop-swoons-over-obama-after-stimulus-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-1819221</link>
		<dc:creator>ginaswo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41992#comment-1819221</guid>
		<description>high hopes

we killed that immigration bill with all our calls and emails, we shouldnt knock it, since polls are rigged it is the ONLY way to get thru to them and be sure your fedback was recorded

I get verying degrees of response depending on the COngress Critter..but they DID get the message on immigration bill and on TARP One, then the big players took the DOW down 777 and they got scared and caved..the suckers..

anywho one of mine always replies to me with a handwritten note personal to my issue on the bottom and has a signature you cant mistake, lol, the other form letters all the way

but they do have little tic sheets to keep track of calls postive/negatiove..i say keep calling!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>high hopes</p>
<p>we killed that immigration bill with all our calls and emails, we shouldnt knock it, since polls are rigged it is the ONLY way to get thru to them and be sure your fedback was recorded</p>
<p>I get verying degrees of response depending on the COngress Critter..but they DID get the message on immigration bill and on TARP One, then the big players took the DOW down 777 and they got scared and caved..the suckers..</p>
<p>anywho one of mine always replies to me with a handwritten note personal to my issue on the bottom and has a signature you cant mistake, lol, the other form letters all the way</p>
<p>but they do have little tic sheets to keep track of calls postive/negatiove..i say keep calling!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ginaswo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/27/aww-house-gop-swoons-over-obama-after-stimulus-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-1819203</link>
		<dc:creator>ginaswo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41992#comment-1819203</guid>
		<description>I think we need to call the GOP members and let them know it is a okay for them to push back and do their frakin jobs v the one..

they seem afraid, the way Hillary was in the primaries, and that is becase the media hounds are unleashed everytime someone isnt swooning over the one

if enough people contact their Representatives maybe they will get the message that it is okay to challenge the POTUS authority, as a DEM I tell them to pretend it is Big Dawg lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we need to call the GOP members and let them know it is a okay for them to push back and do their frakin jobs v the one..</p>
<p>they seem afraid, the way Hillary was in the primaries, and that is becase the media hounds are unleashed everytime someone isnt swooning over the one</p>
<p>if enough people contact their Representatives maybe they will get the message that it is okay to challenge the POTUS authority, as a DEM I tell them to pretend it is Big Dawg lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: highhopes</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/27/aww-house-gop-swoons-over-obama-after-stimulus-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-1819185</link>
		<dc:creator>highhopes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41992#comment-1819185</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Some of us actually pick up the freaking phone or send an email to our representatives. What have you done other than surrender?

Buy Danish on January 27, 2009 at 5:10 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And the twenty-something at the other end appreciates your effort because you keep them employed in a job secured by daddy&#039;s contribution to the Congressman&#039;s campaign.  Only once have I ever gotten a legitimate response (from my Congressman on the eve an election).  Otherwise that twentysomething sends you a pre-programmed generic response that welcomes your input and assures you that the politician will seriously consider your views when voting on the issue you brought up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Some of us actually pick up the freaking phone or send an email to our representatives. What have you done other than surrender?</p>
<p>Buy Danish on January 27, 2009 at 5:10 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>And the twenty-something at the other end appreciates your effort because you keep them employed in a job secured by daddy&#8217;s contribution to the Congressman&#8217;s campaign.  Only once have I ever gotten a legitimate response (from my Congressman on the eve an election).  Otherwise that twentysomething sends you a pre-programmed generic response that welcomes your input and assures you that the politician will seriously consider your views when voting on the issue you brought up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: highhopes</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/27/aww-house-gop-swoons-over-obama-after-stimulus-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-1819178</link>
		<dc:creator>highhopes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41992#comment-1819178</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Rep. Bob Inglis (R-S.C.) said that Obama was sincere and “impressive” during his meeting with Republicans Tuesday afternoon.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Translation:  My district has enough black Obama cult worshipers I need to fawn over the filthy bastard if I want to be reelected in 2010.


&lt;blockquote&gt;“If [the] President carries this on it does open door for a new tone!” Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R-Mich.) exclaimed.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Translation:  I&#039;ve already announced my retirement and am looking to run for governor in a state that is all but owned by the corrupt Michigan Democrat Party, UAW, and teacher&#039;s union.  It doesn&#039;t do me any harm to fawn over the filthy bastard if it softens the ground back in the ghettos of Detroit and the boardrooms of organized labor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Rep. Bob Inglis (R-S.C.) said that Obama was sincere and “impressive” during his meeting with Republicans Tuesday afternoon.</p></blockquote>
<p>Translation:  My district has enough black Obama cult worshipers I need to fawn over the filthy bastard if I want to be reelected in 2010.</p>
<blockquote><p>“If [the] President carries this on it does open door for a new tone!” Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R-Mich.) exclaimed.</p></blockquote>
<p>Translation:  I&#8217;ve already announced my retirement and am looking to run for governor in a state that is all but owned by the corrupt Michigan Democrat Party, UAW, and teacher&#8217;s union.  It doesn&#8217;t do me any harm to fawn over the filthy bastard if it softens the ground back in the ghettos of Detroit and the boardrooms of organized labor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buy Danish</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/27/aww-house-gop-swoons-over-obama-after-stimulus-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-1819082</link>
		<dc:creator>Buy Danish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41992#comment-1819082</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;paul006 on January 27, 2009 at 5:05 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Some of us actually pick up the freaking phone or send an email to our representatives. What have you done other than surrender?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>paul006 on January 27, 2009 at 5:05 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Some of us actually pick up the freaking phone or send an email to our representatives. What have you done other than surrender?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sabbott</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/27/aww-house-gop-swoons-over-obama-after-stimulus-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-1819078</link>
		<dc:creator>sabbott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41992#comment-1819078</guid>
		<description>House Republicans are worthless along with Senate Republicans!  No leadership and certainly no Conservative Cred.!  I wash my hands of them and don&#039;t care a whit about them for the next 4 years.  Ninkompoops all...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>House Republicans are worthless along with Senate Republicans!  No leadership and certainly no Conservative Cred.!  I wash my hands of them and don&#8217;t care a whit about them for the next 4 years.  Ninkompoops all&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul006</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/27/aww-house-gop-swoons-over-obama-after-stimulus-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-1819065</link>
		<dc:creator>paul006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41992#comment-1819065</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Don’t worry, they’re still voting no on the stimulus. I think.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It doesn&#039;t matter how they vote. They&#039;re badly outnumbered. Their votes don&#039;t signify.

A lot of folk here at Hot Air still act as if we were running something. We&#039;re not running anything, except mouths, keyboards and blogs. We&#039;re kind of sad, actually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Don’t worry, they’re still voting no on the stimulus. I think.</p></blockquote>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter how they vote. They&#8217;re badly outnumbered. Their votes don&#8217;t signify.</p>
<p>A lot of folk here at Hot Air still act as if we were running something. We&#8217;re not running anything, except mouths, keyboards and blogs. We&#8217;re kind of sad, actually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seven Percent Solution</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/27/aww-house-gop-swoons-over-obama-after-stimulus-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-1818957</link>
		<dc:creator>Seven Percent Solution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41992#comment-1818957</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;..... Nearly as many House Republicans sought to get their photos taken with Obama as questioned him about the stimulus during their meeting.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&#039;t know about you...........

.............. but I wouldn&#039;t want my picture taken by someone who is trying to socialize this country and fund the Democratic Party with tax payer dollars.

Rush had it right again today......

...... he already has the Democratic votes to do this.  If it is such a good idea, why even bother with the Republicans, unless you will need &quot;the usual suspects&quot; to hang this on come election time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;&#8230;.. Nearly as many House Republicans sought to get their photos taken with Obama as questioned him about the stimulus during their meeting.”</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about you&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.. but I wouldn&#8217;t want my picture taken by someone who is trying to socialize this country and fund the Democratic Party with tax payer dollars.</p>
<p>Rush had it right again today&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230; he already has the Democratic votes to do this.  If it is such a good idea, why even bother with the Republicans, unless you will need &#8220;the usual suspects&#8221; to hang this on come election time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buy Danish</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/27/aww-house-gop-swoons-over-obama-after-stimulus-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-1818945</link>
		<dc:creator>Buy Danish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41992#comment-1818945</guid>
		<description>And may I add what a complete dolt Press Secy Gibbs is?  Will some reporter please ask him how jackhammer and paving jobs or hiring more policemen, all &lt;em&gt;at taxpayer expense&lt;/em&gt; help the people who have been laid off by, say, Microsoft who lost their private sector jobs because of the collapse of the housing and credit markets?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And may I add what a complete dolt Press Secy Gibbs is?  Will some reporter please ask him how jackhammer and paving jobs or hiring more policemen, all <em>at taxpayer expense</em> help the people who have been laid off by, say, Microsoft who lost their private sector jobs because of the collapse of the housing and credit markets?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buy Danish</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/27/aww-house-gop-swoons-over-obama-after-stimulus-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-1818923</link>
		<dc:creator>Buy Danish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41992#comment-1818923</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;This would be the same meeting at which The One told them to get bent &lt;strong&gt;if they think he’s going to add any more tax cuts to the bill&lt;/strong&gt;, inviting them to “whack me over the head” about it if it makes them feel better. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Where does that Politico story say that Obama has said no to &lt;strong&gt;all&lt;/strong&gt; tax cuts?  He says he won&#039;t get rid of the welfare rebates, but I can&#039;t find anything else.

I actually think the Republicans are playing this very smart: Blame it on Pelosi!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This would be the same meeting at which The One told them to get bent <strong>if they think he’s going to add any more tax cuts to the bill</strong>, inviting them to “whack me over the head” about it if it makes them feel better. </p></blockquote>
<p>Where does that Politico story say that Obama has said no to <strong>all</strong> tax cuts?  He says he won&#8217;t get rid of the welfare rebates, but I can&#8217;t find anything else.</p>
<p>I actually think the Republicans are playing this very smart: Blame it on Pelosi!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
