Quote of the day

After listening to liberals yell for Bush to be impeached,sent to prison,called a war criminal,Hitler,liar,chicken hawk…on..and..on…and..on.

After watching them support groups like code pink,Answer,and move-on,who vandalized recruitment centers,spit at Soldiers calling them murders,child predators,and war criminals.

After watching hollywood and the rest of the entertainment industry make Bush out to be a lying,war monger that sent our Soldiers to battle for oil.
Make movie after movie,album after album making our troops and President out to be corrupt,murders and rapists.

I sure as HE!! am not going to let them tell me that I have to support OBama and am not allowed to wish his policies to fail.

Remember:
DISSENT IS PATRIOTIC

SPEAK TRUTH TO POWER

IT’S CALLED FREE SPEECH REMEMBER LIBERALS.

These are just a few of Obama’s policies that I want to see fail:

Challenges loom as Obama seeks space weapons ban
Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:14am EST
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE50O15X20090125

WASHINGTON (Reuters) –

President Barack Obama’s pledge to seek a worldwide ban on weapons in space marks a dramatic shift in U.S. policy while posing the tricky issue of defining whether a satellite can be a weapon.

Two years ago, China used a missile to destroy one of its own satellites in a test that raised worries about a new arms race in space. The incident may have created thousands of pieces of debris.

Work on classified projects involving an “active” military response to attacks against U.S. satellites might be halted in favor of more monitoring and passive protection measures,

Passive,soft power,and appeasement seem to be key words in how Obama wants to deal with Freedom’s enemies.
China and Russia are already in space dumba$$.
Does Obama believe he can take their word that they will not develop military weapons that can be deployed from space?

Obama and Guns: Two Different Views
Monday , April 07, 2008
By John R. Lott, Jr.

http://www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_story/0,3566,347690,00.html

Obama:“I don’t believe that people should be able to own guns.”

For example, when Obama ran for the Illinois state senate the political group, Independent Voters of Illinois (IVI), asked him if he supported a “ban [on] the manufacture, sale and possession of handguns” and he responded “yes.”

In 1998, another questionnaire administered by IL State Legislative National Political Awareness Test didn’t ask about banning all handguns, but it did find that Obama wanted to “ban the sale or transfer of all forms of semi-automatic weapons.”
Indeed, such a ban would outlaw virtually all handguns and the vast majority of rifles sold in the United States.

Whether it is by taxing the he!! out of guns/ammo,making ownership impossible to obtain by creating unbelievable restrictions or forcing laws through with their majority,I don’t won’t this to succeed.

Political Interference Seen in Bank Bailout Decisions
Barney Frank Goes to Bat for Lender, and It Gets an Infusion
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123258284337504295.html

“It’s totally arbitrary,” says South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford. “If you’ve got the right lobbyist and the right representative connected to Washington or the right ties to Washington, you get the golden tap on the shoulder,” says Gov. Sanford, a Republican.

Rep. Waters heads the House Financial Services subcommittee on housing, and until last spring her husband, Sidney Williams, was a OneUnited director. Rep. Frank, besides heading the Financial Services Committee, has longstanding ties to OneUnited, and recalls having had a deposit account at a predecessor bank in the 1960s.

Later that month, Rep. Frank was intimately involved in crafting the legislation that created the $700 billion financial-system rescue plan. Mr. Frank says that in order to protect OneUnited bank, he inserted into the bill a provision to give special consideration to banks that had less than $1 billion of assets

Obama’s huge “pay to play” pork bill will do little to nothing to energize the economy.But I am sure it will energize their campaign funds and bank accounts.

Yes I do want Obama to fail,because it is best for the country that his corrupt and naive policies fail.

Baxter Greene on January 26, 2009 at 1:33 AM

What do you do when a major employer is perpetually bankrupt and we are having to shell out billions and billions of dollars to bail them out because their cost are to high and they can’t compete with the competition.

According to the “smart ones”,increase their costs more based on junk science from eco-fundamentalist:
(via Ace of Spades)

Obama: You Know What The Struggling Auto Industry Needs? An Expensive New Mandate!
http://minx.cc/?post=281752

Okay, so that’s not exactly how he’ll put it but that’s pretty much the net effect of his administrations plan to allow California and other states to set emission and mileage standards.

President Obama plans to instruct key federal agencies today to reexamine two policies that could force automakers to produce more fuel-efficient cars that yield fewer greenhouse gas emissions, according to sources who have been briefed on the announcement.

And what might the cost of this waiver be?

Carmakers also contend that the law could increase manufacturing costs, which then would be passed along to consumers. Environmentalists counter by saying consumers would save money in the long run because higher purchase costs would be offset by lower fuel costs.

The Association of International Automobile Manufacturers, a trade group that represents Honda, Toyota and 12 other international manufacturers, objects to the law on the grounds that it would lead to “a patchwork of state laws” instead of one federal standard. Allies note that the auto industry is already under tremendous financial pressure, with car sales lagging, and can’t afford to comply with new regulations

…“The net effect of his request would add between $1,000 and $5,000 to the price of every car sold in California,” (CA Congressman Tom) McClintock said

“PAY TO PLAY”

Gotta pay back the environmentalist for all those votes and contributions right Obama.

Just like the Unions.

Even if it means more bankruptcy and failure for the auto industry.

Great policies from the “smart ones”.

“YES WE CAN”

Baxter Greene on January 26, 2009 at 8:26 AM