Quote of the day
posted at 10:00 pm on January 25, 2009 by Allahpundit
“‘I hope he fails.’
Do you ever say that about your president if you are an American who loves your country? Would you say it about George W. Bush, who was disastrous; about Bill Clinton, who was slimy; about Jimmy Carter, who was inept; about Richard Nixon, who was crooked? You may think he’s going to fail, yes. You may warn he’s going to fail, yes.
But do you ever hope he fails? Knowing his failure is the country’s failure? Isn’t that, well . . . disloyal?”










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
To answer the first question, hell yes! When Bush tried to pass ILLEGAL Alien Amnesty I, along with most commentators here, wished for President Bush to fail. We wanted him to fail for the good of America.
The failure of a President is not the failure of America. If that were true then America is destined to become an abject failure under the current murderer-in-chief. IMHO, America isn’t that weak.
Finally, if that were disloyal then the majority of the democrat party, along with the lame stream media was/were guilty of disloyality for the better part of 8 years, and my answer is the same that they had for that. So what!
DannoJyd on January 25, 2009 at 11:43 PM
That makes a lot of sense, because I was wondering what the “mellow” part for. I had assumed it was just the only rhyme the illiterate could come up with that had a negative connotation, but you seem to have nailed it.
Yep. And, as we all know, leftist “unity” is all about detailing the many evils of whitey (who built the modern world and was generous enough to allow the Earth to now support almost 7 billion people – most of whom cannot support themselves). Bad whitey.
progressoverpeace on January 25, 2009 at 11:45 PM
My point exactly.
INC on January 25, 2009 at 11:46 PM
LEONARD PITTS JR must have had a bad experience with a clown when younger……….
…………. maybe at Circus Circus.
Eight years of the whole entire Media industry……….
……. Hollywood, National Newspapers, Magazines, Movies, TV-Sitcoms, Plays, Late Night Jokes, SNL, Popular Culture, MoveOn.Org, Music Lyrics, Award Shows, Books, Documentaries, Educational Criteria, Political Press Conferences, Speeches Overseas……….
with one purpose……………. destroy President George W. Bush!
………. I know, you have heard it all before,
But, when one man, says that he
……… Good God!!!!!
Do any of you think this is going to stop over the next two to four years…………….?
……….. If anything, it’s going to get worse, and those who don’t want our advocates or what is left of our political party to call out policies that we disagree with or see that will destroy this country,
Can sign up and finance John McCain on his website…..
Strike back with what you believe, strike back with the truth, expose people like LEONARD PITTS JR for the political hacks that they are…….
……… you want to “just get along”?
Bend over, and smile for what you get………. it’s coming anyway.
Seven Percent Solution on January 25, 2009 at 11:46 PM
LOL percy thanks for those posts
made my night
hope to read more soon
peace biatches!
*IM RICH BIAAAATCH!* (for all you Dave Chappelle viewers)
blatantblue on January 25, 2009 at 11:47 PM
What’s with all the spin? Obama already laid out his plans for appeasing terrorists and imposing socialism. This “what if the sun doesn’t rise tomorrow” garbage is pointless. I hope he fails.
Ronnie on January 25, 2009 at 11:47 PM
Hey LEONARD PITTS JR, Context it the way you like.
But I got news for ya Dipsh-t, Rush made real it clear that he
hopes Omamas policies fail. He also said he would be his
numero ono cheer leader if Omama make good policy, Not the
political postering crap he’s now messing with.
Omamas first week in office has givin the terrorists joy and
a death sentence to the unborn. Not to mention a giant welfare system.
Texyank on January 25, 2009 at 11:47 PM
So far as Iraq… Remember that Obama said that even after the surge had been a success “beyond our wildest dreams”, he would not have taken that action. He would have rather failed. Finished, end of story. This guy is a dolt.
-
He needs to fail at reversing Bush’s win in Iraq. That’s a fact Jack. And let the turds in Gitmo rot. Stop crying for the terrorists, idiot.
RalphyBoy on January 25, 2009 at 11:47 PM
Welfare state?
Please fail.
Confiscation of firearms?
Epic fail.
Political reeducation camps / Gulag?
Fail.
burnitup on January 25, 2009 at 11:48 PM
Rest assured I’d be pretty amazed if they worked too. I’m just not hoping they.. or at least he as a president in general, fail, either
But at least Obama still manages to give some conservatives something to hope about..
Reaps on January 25, 2009 at 11:48 PM
Neither Rush, nor any one of us want him to fail as Commander in Chief! Nothing would make us happier than to discover that we were wrong to be fearful about his capabilities, and that he’s a superb commander! We want him to make decisions which protect our troops to the best of his abilities and keep Americans safe.
But, I want him to fail in closing GITMO because I think its a dangerous idea. I want him to fail in forcing our interrogators to stick to the Army Field Manual because it puts us at risk. I want him to fail with his nuclear disarmament scheme because it will weaken our ability to protect ourselves.
Get it yet?
Buy Danish on January 25, 2009 at 11:48 PM
We should protest those things we disagree with and praise those things we like. Doesn’t matter if it Republicans or Democrats pulling the levers of power.
Mr. Joe on January 25, 2009 at 11:51 PM
I’m thinking… clue, maybe.
jerrytbg on January 25, 2009 at 11:51 PM
When liberals use words the words mean just what they choose them to mean at the time – neither more nor less. Now you might ask how they can make words mean so many different things, but they would reply, “The question is who is to be master – that’s all.”
Cheshire Cat on January 25, 2009 at 11:52 PM
Er, Dittos!
Buy Danish on January 25, 2009 at 11:53 PM
Where have socialist policies worked?
It didn’t work in the Soviet Union.
It doesn’t work in Cuba.
It ain’t working in China either, and they’re employing capitolist policies.
So why would you expect his policies to work here?
Socialism didn’t work elsewhere, so why should it work for Hessein?
Kini on January 25, 2009 at 11:53 PM
Rush, disloyal? Don’t be stupid. He hopes Obama’s idiotic policies fail, NOT The country. And where was this fabled loyalty for GWB?
clnurnberg on January 25, 2009 at 11:53 PM
No doubt Vince. No problem here with entertainers. Problem arises when folks like jenfidel mistake an entertainer for something more. She/he is the LCD type Rush is seeking to influence. I pay Limbaugh no more mind than I pay Olberman, Hannity, Coulter, Matthews and the rest of their ilk.
dakine on January 25, 2009 at 11:54 PM
If Obama ‘succeeds’ the rest of the world wins on America’s back/labor/dough, while she fails, miserably. Of course, this is exactly what the liberal world has always wanted – that America be as miserable as the rest of the world. Enough of this special status.
No one here be fooled – terryann, while a nice person, is either extremely naive, or plays nice to further her own socialist agenda/s. For sure she’s for shamnesty. That alone is a one-world agenda. No need to defend against that, as I’ve read enough of her comments on the shamnesty threads.
Also, I’m very tired of being lectured by the lefties and the pious righties. State your cases, pro or against something, and stop lecturing the rest of us on how to believe, and especially how to behave.
He might not understand himself very well. Why such obsession with AP? Let the man be, however he is.
Entelechy on January 25, 2009 at 11:54 PM
As AZfederalist on January 25, 2009 at 11:43 PM said,
When the Kruschev papers came out in the fifties giving out the atrocities of Stalin, American communists were dumbfounded that those policies failed so miserably to give a happy utopia.
The New Left was founded to try again. Some of the members of the New Left eventually realized that those policies failed miserably again to give a happy utopia.
INC on January 25, 2009 at 11:54 PM
What a stupid question.
Phoenician on January 25, 2009 at 11:55 PM
And if we’re so confident they won’t, why do we need to hope that they don’t?
Reaps on January 25, 2009 at 11:30 PM
It’s knowing they won’t work and not wanting to see them implemented just so we can go through the utterly painful exercise of finding out as everyone else has.
Bishop on January 25, 2009 at 11:55 PM
“All words must be parsed in favor of the left” appears to still be the motto of the MSM.
Does Rush mean he wants the country to fail? Obviously not. But that doesn’t matter to some people. It’s not the meaning, it’s what leverage you can get from the appearance.
Merovign on January 25, 2009 at 11:55 PM
Now it makes sense. The dirt this country rests on will exist even under socialism.
allrsn on January 25, 2009 at 11:56 PM
Look at Alinsky’s Rule #9: “The threat is more terrifying than the thing itself.” The Dems have been playing “the sky is falling” with the economy for several years, even when it was running quite productively.
With the credit collapse, whether engineered or not, the Dems pushed ultimately destructive bandaids of pork-amended TARP funds, which had to be instituted immediately, through exagerrating a fear of threat. They are pulling this same stunt by rushing a boondoggle of a phoney stimulus package by generating fears through threat; ie, if something, especially adoption of the Dem plan is not quickly embraced, we will be lining up in soup kitchens forever. According to Dem lights, the federal government must micromanage banks, investment, manufacturing, health, the climate, etc.
Obama and the Alinskyites are trying to marginalize opponents to this plan and their favored target, Rush Limbaugh, through Rule #11.
However, Obama and the Dems have neglected to recognize that both Rule #11 and Rule #5 can marginalize them, too. Rule 5: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It’s hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.
As long as conservatives have a voice via talk radio or the Internet, ridicule can be most effective. Rush Limbaugh is a master at exposing the foolishness of Obama and his destructive plans for our country’s economy and social structure by employing ridicule. We have seen how thin Obama’s skin is. Rush has obviously gotten under it.
In fact, Rule #9 can work against the Obama socialism and Dem power grab to generate central planning.
Rule 8: Keep the pressure on. Use different tactics and actions and use all events of the period for your purpose. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this that will cause the opposition to react to your advantage.”
onlineanalyst on January 25, 2009 at 11:56 PM
Going in back in time to the Mayflower. Did you know the Plymouth Settlement had a hard time surviving due to implementing communal living? They had to rescind it to prosper.
INC on January 25, 2009 at 11:57 PM
Bend over……
Seven Percent Solution on Jan 25,2009 at 11:46PM.
Seven Percent Solution: This article,is the tip of the
Iceberg,the ‘Early Warning Radar
moment’,the ‘Over the Horizon Array
System’!!!:)
canopfor on January 25, 2009 at 11:57 PM
How did Rush help us in 2008? He didn’t. He’s making conservatives look worse than they already do.
popularpeoplesfront on January 25, 2009 at 11:57 PM
Plus Bossman Rush has a thriving business down there.
Club Gitmo
Kini on January 25, 2009 at 11:57 PM
How’s this for interesting? Leonard Pitts wrote one of the most memorable 9/11 columns and won a Pulitzer for it.
SnarkVader on January 25, 2009 at 11:59 PM
Problem arises when folks like jenfidel mistake an entertainer for something more.
Reagan was an “entertainer” before becoming President.
But hey, he was worthless as a pile of dog crap too.
*eyes rolling so fast that they fell out onto the floor and underneath the fridge*
Bishop on January 25, 2009 at 11:59 PM
I’m no socialist. I love capitalism. It is what makes America strong economic force.
terryannonline on January 25, 2009 at 11:59 PM
It may be an obsession, but it’s more the case of a bunch of flipping idiots who don’t realize that what Allah left as the quote of the day was written by Leonard Pitts, jr. not Allah.
As for America failing, if we fail the world fails, they just don’t know that yet.
Buy Danish on January 26, 2009 at 12:00 AM
Eh… or he could be merely pointing out the irony of someone who has practically made a career of slagging any decision made at the presidential level for the past few years suddenly having a new found distaste for people whom disagree with decisions made at the presidential level. An irony which is obviously lost on some…
elgeneralisimo on January 26, 2009 at 12:01 AM
Bishop, you’re smarter than that my man. Reagan was a great President and he had long ceased being an “entertainer” as a profession by the time he began running for POTUS. I’m sure I don’t have to remind you that he was the president of SAG, Gov of Cali for 8 years and then spent the better part of the 70′s preparing for and running for Prez. C’mon, and please never compare Rush Limbaugh to President Reagan ever again.
dakine on January 26, 2009 at 12:02 AM
Then it seems like we are in agreement.
terryannonline on January 26, 2009 at 12:03 AM
Kini, you missed the purest form of socialism ever tried, on a decent scale – Israeli kibbutzim. These were diehard socialists, and very smart people, who were given everything they needed to get their system up and running. It killed itself and all the reasons anyone needs to know about why socialism fails are found in the experiences of those kibbutzim.
To put it into a nutshell, though, socialism ultimately fails because it cannot handle growth, or any sort of dynamism in society. There are many other problems with socialism, but for the modern world, this is the big one and there is no way to get around it.
progressoverpeace on January 26, 2009 at 12:04 AM
Let the man be…
Entelechy on Jan 25,2009 at 11:54PM
Entelechy:I’m just glad AllahPundit comes up with these
op-ed pieces.
AllahPundit,is not the issue!
This article is an eye-opener,as always’E',nice
talking,er typing to ya!:)
canopfor on January 26, 2009 at 12:04 AM
Allahpundit has the impudence to keep his life a secret from us all
And the arrogance to make us guess
And no, we should not care to know his identity nor his address
PercyB on January 26, 2009 at 12:04 AM
SnarkVader on January 25, 2009 at 11:59 PM
Yep, Pitts, an angry, confused young man if ever there was one, ended up hating Bush for doing just what he wanted when he wrote:
And take this message in exchange: You don’t know my people. You don’t know what we’re capable of. You don’t know what you just started.
But you’re about to learn.
Buy Danish on January 26, 2009 at 12:06 AM
Buy Danish on January 26, 2009 at 12:00 AM
It’s absolutely amazing how so many, after so long, still don’t know that “Quote of the day” is a quote from an article, every single darned night.
If that isn’t obvious, then why on earth do the think it’s all in quotes? We’re in trouble for good reasons.
BD, I’m glad you’re in this world, and here especially. Best always,
Entelechy on January 26, 2009 at 12:08 AM
Same here canopfor, our good friend in Canada. You keep our spirits up with your cheerful nature. Best to you and family,
Entelechy on January 26, 2009 at 12:10 AM
Entelechy, I think you know the answer to your question, and yes, I realize it was rhetorical. There are many, many dumb people in the world and many of them post comments on HA.
dakine on January 26, 2009 at 12:10 AM
There were many liberals that became right minded on 9/11… until they figured out they could divide the country just enough to win back power, then they didn’t care.
Vince on January 26, 2009 at 12:10 AM
dakine on January 26, 2009 at 12:02 AM
Then you must not be aware of what was said about Reagan when he was running for office, starting with his governorship.
There is always some disconnect when it comes to people criticizing those like Rush, that his ability to connect is due only to a glitzy spiel, as if because he is a rich man he can’t possibly connect with the rest of us.
Celebrity? Absolutely, in his own way. Still able to talk plainly and speak about conservative values, again absolutely.
Bishop on January 26, 2009 at 12:11 AM
Do not be Fooled. Wise words.
Anyone with knowledge of the history of socialism can tell you how it had failed. Especially it anyone had lived through it.
Naivete is as dangerous as either wanting, hoping, or believing Hussien’s policies should even have a chance.
That price will be too high to pay.
Kini on January 26, 2009 at 12:12 AM
Damn, Rush is a lot like Reagan. Rush reveres the man and his policies, and tries to guide us into understanding how great they were and how essential they are to our well-being as a nation.
Buy Danish on January 26, 2009 at 12:12 AM
…………. +7%.
Seven Percent Solution on January 26, 2009 at 12:13 AM
The most thought provoking thing in our thought provoking time is that we are still not thinking.
Cheshire Cat on January 26, 2009 at 12:15 AM
BD and Bishop, we’ll just have to agree to disagree regarding Limbaugh. Nothing like Reagan. Reagan was a Goldwater conservative with class and manners. Limbaugh is a loud-mouthed buffoon who does more harm than good for the conservative movement. Like I said though, no sense arguing this one. To each his own, as the saying goes.
dakine on January 26, 2009 at 12:16 AM
Socialism fosters oppression, socialism fosters servitude, socialism fosters cruelty; more abominable is the fact that socialism fosters idiocy.
Tav on January 26, 2009 at 12:18 AM
Then surely he should be in the senate. Probably fast tracked to a leadership position.
Cheshire Cat on January 26, 2009 at 12:22 AM
I once thought like you about Rush.
Then I started to really listen to Rush and discovered how wrong I was.
Actually, right now, Rush is the voice of the conservative party.
Others that share that voice: Michelle Malkin, Sean Hannity, Dennis Prager, etc…. there are many, including many of us here.
Kini on January 26, 2009 at 12:22 AM
Fine, but you’re just know that you are outsmarted, outnumbered and outflanked on this topic.
Thanks for the kind words. And with that I’ll say, goodnight!
Buy Danish on January 26, 2009 at 12:23 AM
Let me get this straight
When leftists and democrats openly call on tv
in front of all our enemies “Murders and rapists”
its patritic dissent
But Since the messiah is a democrat and black
any discent is now TREASON???
BULL CRAP
jcila on January 26, 2009 at 12:23 AM
And there it is.
Bishop on January 26, 2009 at 12:23 AM
For those who don’t think Obama wants to destroy this nation, it might be a good idea to revisit this to remember Obama’s plans for this nation: The Audacity of Barack Obama
Michael in MI on January 26, 2009 at 12:25 AM
Pretty weak BD. I’m outnumber for sure, but “outsmarted” and “outflanked” because I hold a contrary opinion regarding Rush Limbaugh? You sound like one of the many Obama worshipers over at Kos.
dakine on January 26, 2009 at 12:26 AM
Kini, Prager I’ll give you. Hannity and Malkin, not so much. One is a dim bulb and the other is a shrill demagogue.
dakine on January 26, 2009 at 12:28 AM
Prager is my favorite talk show host.
terryannonline on January 26, 2009 at 12:30 AM
He also said, during the Democratic debates, that he didn’t care if lowering the capital gains tax actually resulted in more revenue to the government (the moderator pointed out that it did); he still wanted to raise those taxes in the interest of “fairness.”
It’s simple: If Obama’s policies “work,” they will result in the ends he intends, and those ends are NOT good for us.
His policies will work to distribute income “fairly”; weaken the U.S. internationally; make us less safe; restrict our speech, ability to own guns, and other freedoms; fundamentally alter the constitution; cripple the military; and a host of other things, which, if they “work,” will take away from us our country we once had.
I don’t want to wait to see if they “work” in those ways, and there is no other way in which they can “work.”
Alana on January 26, 2009 at 12:32 AM
Nasrudin sat on a river bank when someone shouted to him from the opposite side: “Hey! how do I get across?”. Nasrudin shouted back: “You are across!
Cheshire Cat on January 26, 2009 at 12:32 AM
No, it is not to score political points but rather it is to put away this silly notion that socialism can build for a better America. To come to face reality that the government can’t generate wealth or create prosperity. It is to understand that digging the hole trillions deeper will only make the country worse and further away from economic growth and wealth. It is to get past such unworkable and immoral attempts at mandating equality and to get on with real market based solutions that might make a difference.
Dollayo on January 26, 2009 at 12:34 AM
You must be a Rino. Sure are not talking like a Conservative. He doesn’t want to destroy our Country? Where have you been? I am not going to waste my breath on this one. Wow he kept what one member of Bush’s cabinet. How big of him. Get a grip!
terryannonline on January 25, 2009 at 10:55 PM
sheebe on January 26, 2009 at 12:35 AM
sheebe, your last post is further evidence that the far ideological right and the far ideological left are basically the same. You spew dogma as if it is truth. Obama doesn’t want to “destroy the United States”. That’s pure demagoguery and you know it. His policy positions are in many cases flawed IMHO, but I’m sure he thinks he’s doing the right thing. You sound like a dope.
dakine on January 26, 2009 at 12:39 AM
When in a hole, fist stop digging.
The light at the end of the tunnel is a train!
Murphy9 on January 26, 2009 at 12:40 AM
Ah well, why am I not surprised that AP posted this?
Hotair rapidly is becoming the tool of the left…
fabrexe on January 26, 2009 at 12:40 AM
Bush was disastrous? Explain. No seriously.
long_cat on January 26, 2009 at 12:42 AM
I also like Medved, Bennet and, The Great One, Mark Levin.
I guess there no accounting for taste, eh? :)
I know Hannity’s radio shows generally turn into a shouting match, but I can tolerate it to a degree.
However, I do not consider any on our side a dim bulbs nor shrill demagogues.
Kini on January 26, 2009 at 12:43 AM
If you think you are doing the right thing, chances are it will back-fire in your face.
Murphy9 on January 26, 2009 at 12:43 AM
OOPs, Sorry Terryann, I jumped a tad on that last comment. I don’t want America to fail at all. Just BO’S ideas of what he wants to do to this Country. You never talked like this before it stunned me. Thought I was on page 2. Didn’t realize it was page 3, hope you can forgive me.
sheebe on January 26, 2009 at 12:43 AM
Yup fab. God forbid conservatives act and think differently from the far left. We sure don’t want to bat around ideas and occasionally question and debate conservative ideas and commentators. An unthinking echo chamber sounds so much better.
dakine on January 26, 2009 at 12:44 AM
Dakine, go screw yourself. If he gets by with what he wants our Country is history. You are a dope.
sheebe on January 26, 2009 at 12:44 AM
sheebe, good retort…you must be some kind of genius. You’re a tier one thinker, full of hyperbole and superficial intellect.
dakine on January 26, 2009 at 12:47 AM
If you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.
Tav on January 26, 2009 at 12:48 AM
Kini, just because a commentator is on “your side”, doesn’t mean they’re any good.
dakine on January 26, 2009 at 12:48 AM
Thinking Tav has gotten ahold of some of the good stuff.
dakine on January 26, 2009 at 12:49 AM
FTA…
Yeah! Hey Anger! ..na na na na…hey…heyay….goodbye…
soundingboard on January 26, 2009 at 12:49 AM
Don’t know what your fucking problem is ass hole but I say as I feel. You wish you had intellect don’t you. You say some idiotic crap.
sheebe on January 26, 2009 at 12:50 AM
The Audacity of Barack Obama:
“Thus Obama compares the new majority he seeks to build to the majority party that Lincoln helped to create. He tries to inspire Democrats by appealing to the founder of the generations-long, post-bellum Republican majority. This is partisan ambition of a high order, masquerading as high-toned bipartisanship or post-partisanship: Obama speaks as though Lincoln were trying to overcome the country’s divisions by calling for unity, for cooperation in the spirit of national renewal. In fact, Lincoln’s point was that the Union would “become all one thing, or all the other.” It would become either all free, or all slave. Lincoln’s road to unity ran through division, through forcing the country to choose. Obama’s point is similar, despite his soothing language: our divisions will be healed once the country is safely in the hands of a new liberal, Democratic majority.
Michael in MI on January 26, 2009 at 12:51 AM
Another good one sheebe. Seriously brah. Quit while you simply sound like a dimwitted high school student, rather than an uneducated rube.
dakine on January 26, 2009 at 12:53 AM
My idea of a Great America is to rid the nation of every trace of liberalism, so if I am elected POTUS in 2012, won’t liberals hope that I fail?
It would be sort of mental disorder if they didn’t want me to fail, if they truly are liberals.
Buddahpundit on January 26, 2009 at 12:56 AM
If I say it is…. then you’ve heard it from GOD!!
My side ….. is the Right side.. all others are wrong.
/raspberries
Kini on January 26, 2009 at 12:56 AM
There was a lot of good in Lincoln. He felt for the slaves and wanted it different for them. Let us hope our Country will be safe and not divided. Only lets not have a majority of the Democrats. Democrats in Lincolns days were nothing like they are now. Great post.
sheebe on January 26, 2009 at 12:57 AM
I have more education than you probably ever had. But what can one expect from a idiot that has a nick named Dakine. Must be a Dog the Bounty Hunter fan.
sheebe on January 26, 2009 at 12:59 AM
i’m gonna presume SOMEONE in the 3 pages of comments has already pointed this out, but pitts [who i used to have a modicum of respect for, and who wrote what remains one of the finest columns written right after 9/11 EVAH] “tells on himself” right away with —
“Knowing his failure is the country’s failure?”
BZZZT!
this country is bigger than the prez. that’s Rush’s point — something pitts and the various other barry fluffers would do well to recognize …
Buckaroo on January 26, 2009 at 1:00 AM
I seemed to have dropped something.
Bishop on January 26, 2009 at 1:00 AM
Ekam sat vipra bahuda vadanti.
Tav on January 26, 2009 at 1:00 AM
sheebe, your many years of education appear to have been a waste of time brah. Your inability to think cogently and articulate your “thoughts” clearly and concisely does not reflect very well on whatever schools you attended. BTW, that last post of yours has to rank in the bottom 1% of anything I’ve ever seen around here.
dakine on January 26, 2009 at 1:04 AM
HAW HAW!
+1 Several of us have tried to explain it and still remain civil to each other.
Kini on January 26, 2009 at 1:05 AM
Tav, gotcha. Enlightenment is a beautiful thing.
dakine on January 26, 2009 at 1:06 AM
well, i’m glad someone likes the term — it was a spur of the moment thing …
Buckaroo on January 26, 2009 at 1:06 AM
You are way too hung up on white man guilt. Let it go.
AprilOrit on January 26, 2009 at 1:06 AM
You have been a total ass hole for a couple of weeks. It started when we were having some fun on one topic. I believe I called BO a monkey. Which I call all politicians monkey’s. You took it that I meant because of his color. You must not have sucked your moms boob that much. You are a whiny sniveling twerp. Sometimes life is to serious. You don’t know how to just have fun at times. Is your problem. I could care less what you think. It is obvious that you haven’t got an expanded intellect. Try to have some fun, might do you some good. After that day, I felt bad. I don’t call him a monkey anymore. That point you made I realized it wasn’t cool. Chill dude.
sheebe on January 26, 2009 at 1:09 AM
If a President is deemed a failure does that mean the country fails ?
Herbert Hoover, Richard Nixon, James Bucannanon, Jimmy Carter and various other Presidents have been failures and we are still here.
Its a false argument
William Amos on January 26, 2009 at 1:09 AM
I think you can still say you hope Obama gets a paper cut when he’s signing his programs into law. Other than that, you’re a “hater”.
Absolutely agree. If the kibbutzim couldn’t make socialism work with some of the highest grade human capital available anywhere on the planet, how in the heck is a country of 300 million people, many of whom can’t even calculate basic compounding interest or make change accurately, covering millions of square miles going to make it work. Add in the growing ethnic diversity (which, in another one of leftists’ contradictory beliefs, increases mistrust between people according to the largest study on it, done by Robert Putnam of “Bowling Alone” fame, the exact opposite of what socialism would require) and you have a recipe for the most unsocialist country possible.
Interestingly, I read another big reason why the kibbutzim failed was because mothers just couldn’t leave their children in the communal day care centers and go off and do their work duties. Yet more proof that biology drives society, not vice versa.
venividivici on January 26, 2009 at 1:10 AM
Ignore Dakine, his wife “makes” him watch stuff on television. He actually watched the oscars or whatever the hell those worthless children get together to pat themselves on the back is called.
He has some twenty-something hipster image to maintain and I can promise you he has watched Grey’s Anatomy more than he has listened to any conservative talk radio. He is just mouthing off what he feels he needs to keep his courageous moderate position.
Dak, yes Obama wants to destroy traditional America as I know it. You know this is what everyone means, so don’t be childish and coy.
ClassicCon on January 26, 2009 at 1:10 AM
Ekam sat vipra bahuda vadanti.
Tav on January 26, 2009 at 1:00 AM
Hey, a guy at my college had that same name; he became a chemical engineer I believe.
Bishop on January 26, 2009 at 1:10 AM
Uh oh…here it comes, flame war.
Bishop on January 26, 2009 at 1:13 AM
This conceit is common to all totalitarian systems.
I read that piece the other day and thought it was excellent.
venividivici on January 26, 2009 at 1:14 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »