Maybe there is hope for the Suckhole State after all. Maybe.

Percy_Peabody on January 23, 2009 at 9:59 AM

HEY! That’s the Land of 10,000 Suckholes. Get it right….

Here frankin screams he didnt get all the votes counted
so they allow more and suddendly he gets ahead
and says
“I win stop the recount”

But BUT BUT…
When coleman then says he ok
if you are going to play that way i want ALL the votes including those 7,000 over there coutned too

Frankin and the democrats cry
LAWSUIT

there was a book by some democrat statagist who said
you keep re-counting until you get the results you want
then you scream STOP..

same thing happened here in washington
Its so bad most people realize to vote now means nothing
because the system has been so skewed to the liberals with both illegals voting, no id required, felons, the dead and even the texas rangers somehow got legal votes in some elections…

Most regular people now realize that the entire system
is about to collapse
Due to the democrats and their FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES..

When it does it will mean open warfare..
I am serious i think its possible..

For the very system i believed in now has become so corrupted with acorn and obama who defended them in court
i dont believe in the us system any more..

If our founding fathers were alive
they would already be reaching for their flintlocks.

Since the law has always been clear on that question, one has to wonder why the Franken campaign even bothered to argue it.

Because lawyers are taught to bring up every possible line of defense or attack, no matter how silly. This is because usually once you’ve made your arguments, you can’t add additional items. There are some small exceptions, but it is better to go full bore at the beginning.

This should become a republican cause celebre to take a stand that will show that we’re not going roll over and let these liberal retards further infiltrate our government so they can turn it all to shit.

Enough of this and enough of the news media garbage.

Kick this clown’s ass, Coleman.

Coleman vs Franken. Solve it the Minnesota way. Shots of home stilled Norweigen hootch washing down chucks of lutefisk. First one who pukes loses.

Are you kidding me? Franken looks like he could swallow anything. Besides, the Dems will rig it so that Franken gets thimble-sized chunks of lutefisk and Coleman gets fist-sized chunks. And what about the shots?

1. Stealing money from Air America, which in turn stole money to afford Franken’s outrageous ($1.0 MILLION +) salary from charity.
2. Played an obnoxious twit on Saturday Night Live, oh that wasn’t playing?
3. Demonstrated to America that he is a spoiled, Jewish brat with visions of adequacy rustling around the vast empty spaces in his head.

At some point, even Soros has got to look at ROI, right?

Does anyone know Minnesota law well enough to know if Coleman can do some kind of grand challenge and say “all these multiple counting standards and irregularities make this election inherently illegitimate, so we need to do a re-vote?”

Outlander on January 23, 2009 at 11:20 AM

There was an op-ed in the WSJ last week that said under Minnesota law, the Governor can order a re-vote if the eletion cannot be resolved clearly and legally. Much of Franken’s margin depends on votes in several precincts where the number of voters signed in on Election Day did not match the machine counts, and this cannot be resolved in court. I believe Coleman will end up arguing that this election simply cannot be legally resolved and must be done over. And of course, he will win if this happens.

Keep fighting Norm. It is about damn time a Republican showed some spine and not back down!

Winebabe on January 23, 2009 at 11:27 AM

Amen to that. Five bucks says Franken’s sitting at home huddled up in a corner in his Stuart Smalley outfit, sucking his thumb and repeatedly saying “People like me! People like me! People like me!”

Coleman says he won’t quit until the ballots get counted correctly, even if the case has to go to the Supreme Court. Franken and Harry Reid can’t be thrilled to hear that.

I just hope Team Coleman was sufficiently aggressive during the recount process in terms of challenging ballots and rejections of ballots and voters and other issues. It sounds like Team Franken was much more aggressive. You have to prepare the evidentiary record if you want to win. Coleman needs to find a net of 250 votes for this to win.

Does anyone know Minnesota law well enough to know if Coleman can do some kind of grand challenge and say “all these multiple counting standards and irregularities make this election inherently illegitimate, so we need to do a re-vote?”

True, I can always head west after the fall, make my way to the autonomous free states of the Dakotas.

Bishop on January 23, 2009 at 10:24 AM

No, no, I’m going to meet up with you and then we will head east to D.C. and clean up that pig sty. Just like Rick007 says:

Time for another Tea Party and Tar and Feathering.

Buy more Ammo!!!!

Rick007 on January 23, 2009 at 11:04 AM