Oklahoma 3 update: Charges dropped

posted at 7:30 pm on January 22, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

A month ago, Paul Jacob and two of his fellow activists for taxpayer rights got the good news that a federal court overturned the residency law that threatened to put them in prison for ten years — requiring that anyone collecting signatures for referendums in Oklahoma live in the state.  The Oklahoma 3 got more good news today.  The state has decided not to appeal the federal decision and will end their prosecution.

From their press release:

(LAKE RIDGE, VA) – Today Paul Jacob, President of Citizens in Charge, a national ballot initiative rights group, reacted to Oklahoma’s decision to drop all charges against the famed “Oklahoma Three” and ending the state’s attempts to hinder the ballot initiative process.

The “OK 3” were accused by Oklahoma of violating the state’s law banning non-residents from circulating petitions. The decision comes weeks after the Federal Court of Appeals ruled the state’s ban violated the First Amendment’s free speech protections.

Paul Jacob made the following statement:

“Today is a great day for justice, for freedom of speech and the right to petition one’s government. It is a great day for Rick Carpenter, Susan Johnson and me – now known as the Oklahoma Three.

“The charges brought against us by the attorney general have now been dismissed. They should never have been brought in the first place. We did not break the law and, as we all now know, the law itself is unconstitutional.

“Our prosecution has sadly had a chilling effect on Oklahomans, who want to reform their government and to hold it accountable through the petition process. My goal throughout this ordeal has been to encourage Oklahomans and Americans everywhere not to let their rights be eroded through fear and intimidation. Today we have won a victory.

“But the battle to protect citizen rights is far from over.

“As President of Citizens in Charge, I look forward to working with all Americans to see the voter initiative process triumph over attacks from politicians. The will of the people should always prevail over the desires of politicians.”

NOTE: The Oklahoma Three consists of Paul Jacob, Susan Johnson, head of a signature-gathering company, and Rick Carpenter, director of Oklahomans In Action.

Citizens in Charge is a non-partisan, non-profit organization dedicated to protecting and expanding the rights of citizens to petition their government.

Jacob explained the case in a Townhall column last year.  As I explained in December, Jacob and the other two defendants didn’t circulate the petitions themselves; they only consulted with the initiative’s leadership on petition circulation.  The state Attorney General charged them with a single count of conspiracy to break the residency-requirement law, but never charged anyone with actually breaking that law.  The AG never filed charges against any signature gatherer.  In other words, the state of Oklahoma prosecuted the OK3 for conspiring to commit supposed crimes for which they cannot and/or will not prosecute the actual alleged criminals.

The AG should have to answer for his Javert-like pursuit of obviously unconstitutional laws to persecute three people whose only crime was apparently consulting for some low-tax activists.  Oklahoma owes Jacob, Johnson, and Carpenter compensation for the money they had to spend to defend themselves against this ridiculous legal action.  In the meantime, we can all rest a little better for Oklahoma’s belated recognition that assisting people in legitimate political activity isn’t a danger to the state.

Update: I neglected to mention this, but the Oklahoma AG is Democrat Drew Edmondson.  Thanks to the commenters who reminded me to note this.  I guess I played Name That Party, didn’t I?

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Sounds like they could be described as “community organizers”, doesn’t it? :)

malclave on January 22, 2009 at 7:34 PM

I don’t think I follow.

Three out of staters tried to file a petition in Oklahoma – but Oklahoma prohibits that? Or was just one of them Oklahoman and called in out-of-state consultants?

Spirit of 1776 on January 22, 2009 at 7:39 PM

“The state Attorney General charged them with a single count of conspiracy to break the residency-requirement law, but never charged anyone with actually breaking that law. The AG never filed charges against any signature gatherer. In other words, the state of Oklahoma prosecuted the OK3 for conspiring to commit supposed crimes for which they cannot and/or will not prosecute the actual alleged criminals.”

Conspiracy and crime are different though, right? You can conspire to murder without killing. So filing for actual crime not necessarily necessary.

Obviously, I need to do some back reading to catch up on this story:)

Spirit of 1776 on January 22, 2009 at 7:42 PM

They should do to this AG what North Carolina did to Mike Nifong in the Duke lacrosse case.

bugsy on January 22, 2009 at 7:46 PM

Since Ed did NOT put the party of the AG in the story, the AG must be a Democrat. C’mon Ed, trying to get a job at the Nuevo Times? ;-}

WashJeff on January 22, 2009 at 7:52 PM

In other words, the state of Oklahoma prosecuted the OK3 for conspiring to commit supposed crimes for which they cannot and/or will not prosecute the actual alleged criminals.

……….. Republicans or Democrats?

Seven Percent Solution on January 22, 2009 at 7:54 PM

Meanwhile ACORN continues to break law after law……

bullseye on January 22, 2009 at 7:56 PM

They may have won there case in the end but they still got screwed.
They spent thousand of dollars on lawyers and no doubt had many sleepless nights.
I’m going out on a limb here but I suspect that the AG in this case was a Democrat.
Democrats hate referendums because it puts power in the hands of all those pesky irresponsible voters who pay their salary.

Lefties always cry about the abuses of citizens rights at the hands of the government but no one will strip you of your real rights quicker than a liberal.

NeoKong on January 22, 2009 at 7:57 PM

ED

OT follow up on a story of yours.

BL@KBIRD on January 22, 2009 at 8:00 PM

The AG of OK is a DEM and a POS named Drew Edmondson.

It sounds like that state got what they wanted anyway – the referendum the petitioners sought was not allowed on the ballot.

Kenrod on January 22, 2009 at 8:16 PM

This is a shocking story. Thanks for bringing it to our attention, Ed. It occurs to me that GITMO prisoners have more rights to petition athan the Oklahoma 3 were afforded.

Republicans or Democrats?
Seven Percent Solution on January 22, 2009 at 7:54 PM

You’ll be stunned to learn that the overzealous AG is a Democrat and his wife is an anthropologist.

Buy Danish on January 22, 2009 at 8:39 PM

You’ll be stunned to learn that the overzealous AG is a Democrat and his wife is an anthropologist.

He’s also the leading contender to be the next Dem nominee for Govenor.
Incidentally, there’s been more coverage of this story on HA than in the eastern Oklahoma media.

billy on January 22, 2009 at 9:09 PM

Scary thing is, word around Oklahoma City is that Edmondson (the AG) is gonna run for governor. Ugh.

Meric1837 on January 22, 2009 at 9:28 PM

Doesn’t make up for the fact that the Sooners still lost to Florida.

Mr. Joe on January 22, 2009 at 11:02 PM

The Sooners losing was God’s punishment on Attorney General Edmondson.

Remember that Oklahoma!

Mr. Joe on January 22, 2009 at 11:03 PM

And what was the price tag for fighting this?

Usually a State AG will issue a threat to indict just to see what the reaction is. If the defendants don’t roll over they bring prosecution and drag the case out until the defendants run out of money.

I’ll bet that in this case, standing on principal came with a hefty bill.

schmuck281 on January 23, 2009 at 12:45 AM

Conspiracy and crime are different though, right? You can conspire to murder without killing. So filing for actual crime not necessarily necessary.

Obviously, I need to do some back reading to catch up on this story:)

Spirit of 1776 on January 22, 2009 at 7:42 PM

True, though usually there is a substantive crime charged along with conspiracy. Such as attempted murder, or a payment to a “hitman” (undercover cop). That’s what bugs me about the Scooter Libbey & Martha Stewart convictions for obstruction, they weren’t convicted of anything else, and neither Libbey nor anyone else was charged with anything else.

The real crime here was that OK citizens were trying to deny their overlords their rightful share of the serfs’ labor.

rbj on January 23, 2009 at 8:29 AM

Good news, thanks for bringing it to us Ed.

Maxx on January 23, 2009 at 10:38 AM

YOu see a lot of this bullcrap
Liberal judges
SCREAMING when Americans gatehr together trying to vote honestly

But if its obama, acorn, the homosexuals or the communists..

Hell the entire press corp would be helping them screaming ofr how unfair it is to dis-enfranchise all of those ILLEGAL VOTERS from VOTING..

Does anyone see the absolute liberal insanity here?

jcila on January 23, 2009 at 3:57 PM

Democrat Drew Edmondson is a disgrace to his office, but any moron could have guessed that as soon as they knew he is a democrat. :o)

DannoJyd on January 23, 2009 at 7:16 PM

Montana Gov. Schweitzer, also a Paul Jacob foe, did the same crap to us in 2006 with the Property Rights and Spending Cap initiatives.

And some people have called Schweitzer a “decent Western Democrat.” Puhleeeeeze!

ericdondero on January 24, 2009 at 8:39 AM