Meghan McCain on Palin: Um, no comment
posted at 2:10 pm on January 22, 2009 by Allahpundit
Her second conspicuous demurral on this subject in less than 10 days. Just for giggles, I did a Google search of her blog to try to find the last time she mentioned Palin there. Unless I missed something, it was all the way back on the night of McCain’s concession speech. For all the sniping between Team ‘Cuda and Team Maverick, to the best of my knowledge no one named Palin or McCain has yet said an unkind word publicly about the other side. Smart money’s on Meghan to finally be the one to crack.
Watch the whole thing if you’re in the mood for some Times-bashing or else skip ahead to 3:00. “I don’t really think I would like to look back on what happened during the election,” she says in response to the question about Palin, having just spent three minutes looking back on what happened during the election. Exit question: If it’s all about looking forward, why’d she say just last week that Sarahcuda is the “only part of the campaign that I won’t comment on publicly”?
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Well, I for one appreciate what Meghan did for the campaign. I really enjoyed her blog and thought she did a wonderful job of rallying young voters.
So I’m not about sit here now and tear her down over some vague comments.
Besides, she’s a private citizen, not a politician.
The Ugly American on January 22, 2009 at 5:11 PM
She got a book deal because of WHO she is. I would like that opportunity, but my last name is not McCain.
She put herself out there….if she can’t take it, don’t dish it.
HornetSting on January 22, 2009 at 5:13 PM
If he thought that, he should not have picked her as his running mate.
baldilocks on January 22, 2009 at 5:13 PM
Must be difficult for her to accept that people are more interested in Sarah Palin than in Mc.
beachgirlusa on January 22, 2009 at 5:15 PM
She’s young and VERY protective of her father, HomeSting.
I’m sure that many people here do the same when someone criticizes a family member.
Shocking, I know but it happens.
The Ugly American on January 22, 2009 at 5:22 PM
Palin is awesome. I really like the fact that any post on HA that includes the word “Palin” is a guaranteed 500 post minimum. The crazy left couldn’t get rid of her if they tried.
portlandon on January 22, 2009 at 5:24 PM
Unreal.
I don’t know how many brain cells you people have, but IF someone makes a claim, then it’s their opinion, not the truth. So why are you acting like someone’s opinion is the truth?
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 5:27 PM
I understand, but does she need to play the “hate Palin” game like everyone else.
If she voted for Kerry and Gore, she probably HATES Palin’s ideals.
HornetSting on January 22, 2009 at 5:28 PM
I’m still unsure of what Palin said that would prompt her being protective of her father. Perhaps you could enlighten me?
Esthier on January 22, 2009 at 5:28 PM
You are a walking brain tumor.
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 5:29 PM
Too bad her father left his integrity in a jail cell in North Vietnam. It looks as if that’s hereditary in the McCain family.
nelsonknows on January 22, 2009 at 5:30 PM
Wow. What an answer.
HornetSting on January 22, 2009 at 5:30 PM
You mean like Haley Barbour? What about Saxby Chambliss who just mudstomped his way through a runoff? Bob Corker seems to have a bright future in the Senate. Bobby Jindal is an obvious hopeful candidate. The South is a Republican strong hold.
Jeff Sessions, is so calm and cool. I think he matches Obama in that dept. He makes no apologies for being a Republican or being from the South. He shouldn’t.
I get the worry that Republicans have about white guys from the South, ala George Allen. But the southerners seem to be the only ones willing to stand their ground. Flimsy Graham notwithstanding.
Do not be afraid of the post-election map; embrace it as an attack plan.
***
Also, I actually think the South will be key to forcing the illegal immigration issue to a head. Amnesty and feckless border sovereignty is a great point upon which to challenge Dems in the coming years.
The Race Card on January 22, 2009 at 5:30 PM
For the love of GOD, why is it that because she does not reply to a question, then you people accuse her of playing the “hate Palin” game?
Why the hell do you all need to play the “Guilty until proven innocent” game?
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 5:31 PM
C’mon gang, she’s young and inexperienced…give her a break.
At least she’s not asking us to take any asinine pledge ; )
Frankly, I’d like keep her close to our camp rather than adding another liberal to the pile.
The Ugly American on January 22, 2009 at 5:32 PM
if you are referring to the troll’s 4:46 PM comment, then the reply is appropriate to the level of stupidity of the comment made.
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 5:33 PM
And you defend Obama.
MadisonConservative on January 22, 2009 at 5:33 PM
If she would ever read this page, The Ugly American, I could see how she would not want to associate herself with us.
This level of insanity here is getting to be up to my eyeballs.
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 5:34 PM
You’re being a troll again. You should stop.
You are an insane, sick, pathetic excuse for a human being.
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 5:35 PM
Why don’t you answer Madison’s question, wise?
HornetSting on January 22, 2009 at 5:35 PM
How about this comment?
You think I’m stupid so you hope I die?
MadisonConservative on January 22, 2009 at 5:35 PM
Why don’t you go F off.
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 5:36 PM
Considering the only Republican she’s voted for was her father, I don’t think it’s safe to say she’s in our camp.
Esthier on January 22, 2009 at 5:36 PM
you’re neither funny or going to die, it’s sad to say.
You’re being a troll again. You should stop.
You are an insane, sick, pathetic excuse for a human being.
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 5:36 PM
Nice to hear you wish death on me.
MadisonConservative on January 22, 2009 at 5:37 PM
Stop trolling, or you might.
you’re neither funny or going to die, it’s sad to say.
You’re being a troll again. You should stop.
You are an insane, sick, pathetic excuse for a human being.
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 5:38 PM
…really? How?
MadisonConservative on January 22, 2009 at 5:39 PM
You should stop.
No, wait, you enjoy this, don’t you.
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 5:39 PM
At this point, who could blame her?
The Ugly American on January 22, 2009 at 5:39 PM
I’m coming to believe that McCain is such a Contrarian that he didn’t want to win. Doing so would have actually diminished his “maverick” status.
The Dems proved that Americans will vote for an unripened candidate. One has to wonder how Palin would have been perceived without McCain’s reigns restraining her.
She seems to have learned very very fast though. Sometimes, blessings come as a mixed package. I think the next batch of Repubs will be very savvy in their campaign efforts.
***
It’s sad to read comments about Meghan McCain’s looks, weight, etc. What’s the point of that?
The Race Card on January 22, 2009 at 5:39 PM
Why don’t you go F off.
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 5:36 PM
HornetSting on January 22, 2009 at 5:42 PM
The only person on that list who has a future is Bobby Jindal and the only reason why he has a future is because he’s antithesis to the boring Republican image. The rest are old white guys from the South, who do nothing to revitalize the image of the party.
Illinidiva on January 22, 2009 at 5:42 PM
Why stop? Only one of us is wishing death on the other. To that I say, may you live forever.
MadisonConservative on January 22, 2009 at 5:43 PM
Do you have a problem with white people?
HornetSting on January 22, 2009 at 5:43 PM
Anywhoo…it’s starting to smell like feet and ass in here.
I’m jumping off this crazy train before it plows into the mountainside.
The Ugly American on January 22, 2009 at 5:44 PM
Now you know that McCain wanted to be president. There is no reason to continue with this lame lie over and over and over again to make yourself feel better about the loss and the Obama win. McCain wanted to be president, he tried and failed.
Let this insanity rest for the love of GOD.
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 5:44 PM
don’t be an idiot.
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 5:44 PM
Come on, man. We’re better than that. And, since I assume you have the sufficient higher though processes to classify you as human (as opposed those who infest Kos and the DU), you’re better than that.
There are better ways to critique Meghan McCain’s conduct than to insult her father.
Harpazo on January 22, 2009 at 5:45 PM
You need to stop.
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 5:46 PM
Hornet, he’s absolutely got you there. I think he’s channeling Oscar Wilde with his wit.
MadisonConservative on January 22, 2009 at 5:46 PM
I’m not the one dropping the f-bomb everywhere, wise.
HornetSting on January 22, 2009 at 5:47 PM
You never answered my question. Since, by defending McCain’s position, you’re defending Obama’s position, where do you get off calling other people Obama supporters?
MadisonConservative on January 22, 2009 at 5:48 PM
Oh noes! You just dropped the “F-bomb!!!!”
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 5:48 PM
You are a walking three hundred and fifty pound brain tumor. That’s your answer to you insane comment.
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 5:50 PM
You really need to cool off when it comes to McCain. Other people don’t hold him in as high esteem as you do. That’s okay. They might even say mean, asinine, or low-class things about him. That’s their problem, not yours.
I keep waiting for you to shake off your Pavlovian impulses whenever McCain is mentioned and address people like an adult — I’m glad I’m not holding my breath.
Honestly, you’re worse than csdeven was on Fred Thompson threads.
Harpazo on January 22, 2009 at 5:50 PM
Why can’t you just answer the question, wise?
HornetSting on January 22, 2009 at 5:50 PM
That’s not an answer, and that begs a second question: why do you think you know my weight, or are you just looking for ways to insult and degrade me in your mind so that you can ignore all the questions you’re too afraid to answer?
Oh, and do you think Obama is a socialist? You never got around to that one, either.
MadisonConservative on January 22, 2009 at 5:51 PM
Gawd! Would it be so hard to say something along the lines of, “I liked Gov. Palin, and I wish her the best in the future”, and leave it at that? Whatever happened to loyalty?
McKenz59 on January 22, 2009 at 5:51 PM
How about we start with people not lying about him and believing that he and his daughter are not guilty until proven innocent.
This is the behavior of the liberals who did this same exact treatment to Bush for the last 8 years.
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 5:52 PM
You must really be enjoying this, otherwise you’d stop. Why is that?
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 5:53 PM
Like wishing he would die because they disagreed with him?
MadisonConservative on January 22, 2009 at 5:53 PM
I thought Meghan’s blog was cute as well and the girl certainly knows her way around the media. She clearly loves her dad and is very defensive of him (as she should be). I agree with you about the personal comments. The weight remarks are tacky and something that I heard from the Obama cultist posters on sites like Politico. Cindy and the McCain family were torn down quite a bit by the cultists and the MSM and deserve to be left alone.
However, I do think that Meghan’s no comment statement tells me that there is some bad blood between McCain and Palin and not just Palin and McCain’s staff. Frankly, McCain’s actions with regard to Palin post-election have been disgraceful. Instead of this passive-aggressive whisper campaign, McCain should either confirm the stories on TV (in a tactful way of course) or come out and defend Palin. I think that McCain and Palin likely clashed over campaign tactics, and McCain felt that these disagreements were personal assaults on his character. McCain has trouble understanding the phrase that it’s not personal, it’s just business, which is why he gets so angry and emotional about things.
Illinidiva on January 22, 2009 at 5:53 PM
You still haven’t the guts to answer any of those questions, I guess.
MadisonConservative on January 22, 2009 at 5:54 PM
So what? Why should that matter one iota to you?
What is John McCain to you that you should care what other people say about him? Why are you so protective of his reputation?
Harpazo on January 22, 2009 at 5:54 PM
And another round of the “everyone who doesn’t adore John McCain is glad Obama’s the president” game.
Everything old is ALWAYS new again in the HotAir comments.
Hawkins1701 on January 22, 2009 at 5:56 PM
No, but I don’t think that an old white guy from the South is going to win in places like Colorado or Nevada or Pennsylvania any more. The Republican party will probably need to run either a woman or a minority to get back in the game in 2012 or 2016.
Illinidiva on January 22, 2009 at 5:57 PM
I am not protective of his reputation. I am disagreeing with our behavior. For the F*king last time, we are acting like the people at the DU or Huffington Post by doing the same thing to this man that they did to George W Bush. And I don’t like it. If it’s okay to do this to him, then who’s the next person who fails that we’re going to do this to? Why the hell is this even a consideration for those of us on the right? We are SUPPOSED TO BE BETTER than them!!
How difficult is this for you to understand??
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 5:59 PM
This is like trying to have a conversation with one of the people from the movie Idiocracy.
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 6:01 PM
Ok.
HornetSting on January 22, 2009 at 6:04 PM
Speaking with good will and sincerity, your points would be better received if you avoided comments such as this.
Slublog on January 22, 2009 at 6:05 PM
So, just because McCain has an ‘R’ behind his name, we cannot discuss or disagree with him? Is that it, wise?
HornetSting on January 22, 2009 at 6:05 PM
I guess being a family man of high morals and astounding intellect has nothing to do with it.
Age is certainly a factor in our political system’s efficacy. Too many people are too old.
But what does their race have to do with anything? I am all for GOP big tenting. But to reject people out of hand, just because of their race, is stupid and wrongheaded.
The Race Card on January 22, 2009 at 6:05 PM
Bullsh*t.
The Race Card on January 22, 2009 at 6:07 PM
This is intentional, right?
I mean, you understand that what I am saying is nothing like as you describe.
Right?
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 6:11 PM
Doesn’t seem so by your posts.
HornetSting on January 22, 2009 at 6:12 PM
She’s still my gal.
Palin/Petraeus 2012
Let’s roll.
ex-Democrat on January 22, 2009 at 6:12 PM
I wanted McCain to win, for Obama to lose, and I don’t want to see us acting like the idiots at the DU and Huff Post …. madison says that I’m an Obama supporter.
And how else am I to interpret this dialog?
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 6:13 PM
Excuse me. Since you told me to “sod off” the other day, please stop addressing me or anything that I say. Thanks.
baldilocks on January 22, 2009 at 6:14 PM
My comments are nothing like what you describe. So this line of reasoning from you is genuine? This is what you actually think?
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 6:14 PM
Lead by example.
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 6:14 PM
This site is full of intelligent people, wise. Unlike those on DU and Huff and Kos, we don’t get our talking points from the media.
We are thinkers and we have opinions. Just because our opinion of McCain doesn’t jive with your opinion doesn’t make us traitors.
Just conservatives.
HornetSting on January 22, 2009 at 6:15 PM
Then why do you not give his daughter the benefit of the doubt, HornetSting?
Why do you assume the worst without any factual evidence to back up your beliefs. If that’s what you really think. Or are you doing this because it’s fun?
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 6:16 PM
The fact that many think that Republicans should reach to women and/or racial groups as collectives indicates that the party as abandoned/forgotten its principles.
baldilocks on January 22, 2009 at 6:19 PM
the party as=the party has
baldilocks on January 22, 2009 at 6:19 PM
1. This is the first time you’ve ever given me a straight answer on the matter, so perhaps you’ll excuse my having to ask it multiple times.
2. Your claim to dislike in general the kind of bad-mouthing that some people do here is admirable. And it would actually be legitimate if someone had ever seen you become so incensed in the defense of anyone other than McCain. Perhaps another commentator can vouch for you?
3. However pissed off other people’s behavior may make you, by responding to them with insults, smears, and other baseless personal attacks you have become the very thing that you are claiming to decry.
4. I have repeatedly observed you to refuse to answer direct questions and respond, instead, with attacks on the person who asked the question in the first place.
5. You become demonstrably and increasingly irrational on threads where McCain is mentioned. That leads me to conclude that you have some emotional, personal, or psychological attachment to the man. If you know him, then by all means take personal offense at attacks on him. If you do not know him, please take some time to evaluate your own reactions to him and if they perhaps aren’t out of proportion.
I’m not interested in insulting you or making you look bad. I have tried and am trying to talk to you like a rational adult whose views and attitude I don’t share and am trying to understand. Whatever suggestions I make are in the interest of elevating the quality of the comments here at HotAir — a goal that you claim to share.
If you are truly sincere about trying to make HotAir’s discourse more civil, then I hope you will consider starting with yourself.
Harpazo on January 22, 2009 at 6:19 PM
I have not addressed you. Leave me alone.
baldilocks on January 22, 2009 at 6:20 PM
Exactly. None of this waiting until 2016. The party should be proud of Sarah Palin and its conservative governors like Mark Sanford, Rick Perry and Bobby Jindal. They are bright, and they are coming up with conservative solutions in their own states.
Each election year should be an opportunity for them to explain these ideas to the public and point to their successes. It helps if they have a winning personality, like Sarah Palin does, but it’s more than just winning or a cult of personality.
Bobby Jindal is coming up with alternatives to the nightmare of socialized medicine the Democrats want to force on us. Sarah Palin is leading the way in energy independence. Then you have McCain and his people. Jindal wanted nothing to do with McCain, and now I see why. Palin at least got to showcase the important work she’s doing in Alaska. Meanwhile, McCain is cheering on Obama and making cryptic “No comment” comments whenever Palin is mentioned, when he and the whole GOP should be proud of her.
chunderroad on January 22, 2009 at 6:21 PM
I DON’T have to give her the benefit of the doubt. I truly don’t give a fig about her, to be completely honest.
But, this was her father’s running mate, the least she could do is be gracious and wish Palin the best. Instead, she plays the ‘um, no comment’ bs.
As far as ‘factual evidence’ of Meghan McCain-she voted for Gore and Kerry. That’s enough for me. She is not a conservative, just like Daddy.
As far as the maverick is concerned, past behavior, hell, present behavior dictates my ‘factual evidence’.
He is not a conservative. He just plays one for the vote in Arizona.
HornetSting on January 22, 2009 at 6:23 PM
Good post.
The key to electing good people (and not just a winning personality) is for Republicans to get as excited about a candidate’s good principles, policies, and solutions as the Democrats were about Obama’s person/personality.
There are far worse things to be than a cult of solid, conservative principles.
Harpazo on January 22, 2009 at 6:26 PM
The concern trolls know McCain is in Obama’s pocket. They’ll use him as an example of how we should “reach out to others across the aisle,” though you saw no gratitude for McCain’s record on this during the election. He was instead demonised as McBush. Conservatives have always known this was anything but the case. Well, McCain is back to his Democrat friends, and they like him again. He is how they pose as “conservatives” on threads while attacking any who oppose Obama. I have only seen civil, legitimate and informed complaints about our new President, nothing even remotely like the vitriol that greeted Bush when he took office in 2000.
chunderroad on January 22, 2009 at 6:29 PM
Because, The Race Card, sighted heterosexual men notice women’s looks. I know that’s probably unjust in a perfect world, but that’s the way it is.
I think Meghan McCain is pretty, even if I disagree with her.
If I don’t think a woman is particularly attractive, I don’t have to say so. It doesn’t mean I don’t notice, though.
ddrintn on January 22, 2009 at 6:42 PM
Haha, well, I wouldn’t go so far to say that all the comments about Obama have been civil and informed — but yes, both the legit complaints and the (frequently funny/clever) slams on him have been, and most likely will continue to be because we’re better than that, orders of magnitude more civil, legitimate, and informed than those of the loony leftist moonbats on Bush these last 8 years.
Harpazo on January 22, 2009 at 6:43 PM
Are you people five years old? Some of you act like it. This is one of my favorite sites, I thought at least here I could escape the asinine comments of immature lib “trolls” and possibly engage in reasonable, rational debate/discussion.
beachgirlusa on January 22, 2009 at 6:50 PM
I just heard an “oink”, loud and clear. Anybody else hear that, or am I just tuned in because I’m a piglet?
capitalist piglet on January 22, 2009 at 6:50 PM
Good for her – she’s trying to be polite and not say the obvious: whilst Palin plays well with the base she comes across as a crass idiot to everyone else.
Ares on January 22, 2009 at 7:00 PM
She only comes across as a crass idiot to other crass idiots. See, I can behave like a 5 yr old, too.
beachgirlusa on January 22, 2009 at 7:12 PM
Ah yes, a voice for the ages.
Smells like teen spirit.
HornetSting on January 22, 2009 at 7:12 PM
Um, don’t care.
Y-not on January 22, 2009 at 7:21 PM
As I have said before, I like her but in her current state she is not a viable national politician and the facts bear this out.
Ares on January 22, 2009 at 7:22 PM
I think Meghan McCain is just defending her father. The McCain campaign had no life until Palin arrived. Yes, people were politely supportive. When Palin showed up they went over the moon. That is great for a little while, but that has got to wear on a man who has been in public service his entire adult life.
I don’t think there is anything wrong with John McCain. I just think he did not bring out the enthusiasm of the people. I still think he would have been a better President than Obama.
The fact that the enthusiasm for Palin has not diminished since the election among conservatives has got to be wearing on McCain family. It is not Palin’s fault. Even now, every time any one the McCain’s sits down for an interview, the reporter wants to talk about Palin.
Palin is part of the Republican party and the conservatives future, McCain is part of the past.
After the beating the Republicans took in 2006 and 2008, the conservatives want to look forward.
Even though I do not agree with his politics, McCain is a decent family man and his family was just put through the ringer. Now the only time anyone wants to talk them, they want to talk about Palin.
Meghan is just defending her father’s dignity and that is okay.
kcarpenter on January 22, 2009 at 7:22 PM
Whatev. The attacks on her weight bear no relevance to this discussion other than to satiate the mind of those who need to down people with whom they disagree. It’s childish.
Attacking a woman’s looks when they have no relevance to the discussion is equal to attacking a person’s race or religion under equally irrelevant auspices. That is archetypal sexist behavior. You don’t have to agree with me to prove me right. Disagree more vehemently and further illustrate my point.
Unless the man is notably odd looking (Henry Waxman, Chertoff, etc), men are not regularly attaacked for their looks. Act shocked, but you know what I’m saying is true.
I’m a certified ogler. I love the female form. That doesn’t mean I abandon civility to please my penis/brain. I was at a concert last night and some woman pulled out her breasts on stage. You think I turned away?
The Race Card on January 22, 2009 at 7:23 PM
Breasts become tits when they are being flashed. Got it?
The Race Card on January 22, 2009 at 7:24 PM
‘They’ being the base. Who are a tiny fraction of the electorate.
The rest of the electorate wasn’t quite so keen, to put it mildly. And all the polls before the result and the result itself bear this out.
Ares on January 22, 2009 at 7:30 PM
We are better than them and these comments are thoughtful and civil!
The reason we can do it to McCain is that he threw us–his own supporters–many times under the bus during the course of the campaign, calling every legitimate issue with which we tried to take on Obama on his merits “racist.”
We are better than them and we can do this to McCain because he isn’t one of us and never was.
Ask around.
Rush, quite rightly, calls him the 60th Democrat Senator.
And if you persist in this blind, mindless defense of McVain any longer, wise_man, I’m definitely going to assume you’re Lindsay Graham, John’s closet case boyfriend.
Jenfidel on January 22, 2009 at 7:30 PM
Most Gov. Palin’s politics is opposite of McCain’s, I don’t blame her for not wanting in the middle of it.
Speakup on January 22, 2009 at 7:50 PM
Eh, Meghan is just jealous because the entire Palin family is better looking and in much better shape than she is.
RightWinged on January 22, 2009 at 8:02 PM
Nice to see the Palin fanboys and girls descending on another person who doesn’t sing loud praises of teh one. Get a friggin grip already.
If she were to say “My ultimate goal in life is to kiss Palin’s ^%^ at high noon on Pennsylvania avenue” you would still find something dark and conspiratorial in that..
Manly Rash told me that he predicts trivial pursuit edition 32 for Palin but no office higher than Senator. And we know that is a prediction we can take to the bank,
Bradky on January 22, 2009 at 8:02 PM
Gov. Palin is never crass nor an idiot–I’m afraid you’ve got that market cornered all by yourself.
The base is a lot larger than you think and she appeals to millions of people who didn’t even know they were “Republicans,” but just Americans who believe in bedrock American values.
The peanut gallery on SNL isn’t the voice of the American people no matter how much you insist that you are, Tina Fey/Ares.
Jenfidel on January 22, 2009 at 8:04 PM
John Roberts did try to bait her with a question about Palin being “critical” of her dad & the campaign, and she wisely refused to take the bait. Essentially, she was positive but noncommittal.
I am curious about her answer in terms of the whole clip, though. She talked about criticism of her mom, she talked about media bias & hoping it would be better next time (yeah right!), but then when the criticism of Palin in the media came up, you could hear the brakes slamming in her mind. Not even gonna go there, she was thinking….
cs89 on January 22, 2009 at 8:05 PM
Well said. If the GOP is going to be relevant again it must stop trying to drive away everyone who is not in lockstep with each self-professed conservative.
Bradky on January 22, 2009 at 8:12 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »