Meghan McCain on Palin: Um, no comment
posted at 2:10 pm on January 22, 2009 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Her second conspicuous demurral on this subject in less than 10 days. Just for giggles, I did a Google search of her blog to try to find the last time she mentioned Palin there. Unless I missed something, it was all the way back on the night of McCain’s concession speech. For all the sniping between Team ‘Cuda and Team Maverick, to the best of my knowledge no one named Palin or McCain has yet said an unkind word publicly about the other side. Smart money’s on Meghan to finally be the one to crack.
Watch the whole thing if you’re in the mood for some Times-bashing or else skip ahead to 3:00. “I don’t really think I would like to look back on what happened during the election,” she says in response to the question about Palin, having just spent three minutes looking back on what happened during the election. Exit question: If it’s all about looking forward, why’d she say just last week that Sarahcuda is the “only part of the campaign that I won’t comment on publicly”?
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 Next »
Father is like daughter…
No balls.
madmonkphotog on January 22, 2009 at 2:11 PM
My heart belongs to ‘Cuda.
It never belonged to McCain.
D2Boston on January 22, 2009 at 2:12 PM
The Democrats went through this same internal war crap in 2004, right? This is kind of normal, right?
BadgerHawk on January 22, 2009 at 2:12 PM
McCain screwed the pooch and he’s letting everyone around him quiety and obviously blame Palin. He just lost that last tiny speck of tolerance I had for him.
Laura in Maryland on January 22, 2009 at 2:12 PM
Uh, don’t get caught anticipating something profound from this young woman. Settle for recognizable.
drjohn on January 22, 2009 at 2:13 PM
Ok, Megan, we get it. For whatever reason you don’t like Sara. As if your opinion about any political matters at all.
Sarah 2012!
kutabeach on January 22, 2009 at 2:13 PM
Mccain lost the election with a huge assist by Paulson/Bush.
They can’t blame Sarah for anything except for making as close as it was
kangjie on January 22, 2009 at 2:13 PM
Reminds me of Dad– “I will make them famous”– when talking about earmarks, earmarks, earmarks… then votes for the bailout bill festooned with earmarks without saying a word. Consistency and logic has never been a McCain strength. Putting self first is.
Pasalubong on January 22, 2009 at 2:13 PM
Eh, who cares. “My President is Black!“
flipflop on January 22, 2009 at 2:14 PM
And it’s his fault because she doesn’t-no Y.
I agree. I have NO respect for him now, I don’t care WHAT he’s done in the past.
What a frigging putz.
If I were Palin, I’d be pi$$ed.
Badger40 on January 22, 2009 at 2:14 PM
the McCain people have probably been told to give the media nothing when they ask about Palin, its a trap
jp on January 22, 2009 at 2:14 PM
Jealous b*tch.
Jenfidel on January 22, 2009 at 2:15 PM
Meghan rocks.
SnarkVader on January 22, 2009 at 2:15 PM
You can say a lot of negative things about McCain. But you cannot say he has “no balls.” That is precisely his problem; he is sometimes overly agreesive against his opponents, who are usually members of his own party…
RedSoxNation on January 22, 2009 at 2:15 PM
Megan loved the Palins during the campaign, especially Piper.
just because she doesn’t say anything here, doesn’t mean anything.
jp on January 22, 2009 at 2:16 PM
Hm.
This has no bearing on McCain not defending Palin after the election.
None at all. *cough*
MadisonConservative on January 22, 2009 at 2:16 PM
McCain screwed the pooch and he’s letting everyone around him quiety and obviously blame Palin. He just lost that last tiny speck of tolerance I had for him.
Laura in Maryland on January 22, 2009 at 2:12 PM
I agree with you. McCain was nothing but passive, and submissive during the enitre campaign. He didn’t want to attack Obama on anything that really mattered, Ayers, Rev Wright, ect. IMHO Sarah has more cojones then McCain ever did. It is high time for him to step aside and fade into the sunset.
milwife88 on January 22, 2009 at 2:18 PM
Exactly why McCain lost.
Dear gawd, people…give the McCain-derangement a rest, huh?
JetBoy on January 22, 2009 at 2:18 PM
14:56…14:57…14:58…14:59…
Warhol and Orwell. Two of the Twentieth Century’s giants.
CornFedBeauty on January 22, 2009 at 2:19 PM
Bingo. McVain can’t figure out that his own lousy campaign and his contempt for conservatives did him in, so his ego demands he blames someone else. The lefty media (his base) has provided him with a nice, convenient scapegoat.
thirteen28 on January 22, 2009 at 2:19 PM
Meghan is taking the high road by not commenting on how ungrateful Palin has been. McCain put her in the national spotlight and the Messiahette has show her gratitude by trashing him. Good for Meghan.
SnarkVader on January 22, 2009 at 2:19 PM
You see… the whole Meghan no comment situation makes me think that there’s something else going on than just Nicole Wallace throwing Palin under the bus for lobbying clients and invites to Sally Quinn’s house. It seems that McCain himself is part of the whole situation.
Illinidiva on January 22, 2009 at 2:20 PM
Roberts is trying to get Megan to say something bad about Palin in that interview, clearly. By throwing Palin saying criticism of ‘her fathers campaign’….
what do you want, Meghan to say:
1) bash Palin for saying negative things of her dad’s campaign?
2) Agree with Palin about the criticism of HER FATHERS campaign?
3) dodge the question with ‘no comment’?
jp on January 22, 2009 at 2:20 PM
McCain must have used up his lifetime’s supply of loyalty in Hanoi, because he’d much rather make new friends on the other side of the aisle than look after the friends he already has…
It must have been very upsetting for the McCains to have their moment in the sun stolen by the ‘Cuda and her bunch.
This is jealousy.
Nat Hound on January 22, 2009 at 2:20 PM
Tell you what, how about McCain and his supporters like you give PDS a rest and quit blaming her for sinking a campaign that would have been lousy regardless of her presence? Can you guys do that?
thirteen28 on January 22, 2009 at 2:20 PM
And I’m sure we can count on a McCain daughter’s diss of Gov Palin being highlighted here at HotAir almost as quickly as at HuffPo.
katiejane on January 22, 2009 at 2:21 PM
Sara is not the one that is now aiding BHO in weakening our country. That would be her RINO Dad.
So long you useless, dusty, old fart.
DeweyWins on January 22, 2009 at 2:21 PM
It’s not MDS. We’re talking about a guy who dumps on his party and “base” for media adulation, then asks them for money and courts them with Palin to win an election, and then when he loses sits by while she gets trashed– as do our principles (ie, immigration). If he’s so Mr. Maverick, change parties– go independent. But he didn’t do that because he knew he had no shot of winning the presidency (or senate seat) that way. We’re just kind of sick of being his punching bag.
Pasalubong on January 22, 2009 at 2:21 PM
Why is this girl being interviewed?
DrMagnolias on January 22, 2009 at 2:22 PM
I’m tired of constant outrage that someone didn’t adequately boost Palin. It reminds me of how Democrats were constantly called on to boost or defend Obama.
She’s on her own. Palin was given the gift of a national profile, and it’s up to her to do something with it.
MayBee on January 22, 2009 at 2:22 PM
Didn’t this ditz had Obama on her Facepage/Myspace page until someone noticed it? Even though her father was going to run for the GOP nomination?
Wethal on January 22, 2009 at 2:22 PM
The McCain Family is dead to me. I voted for Sarah and that jackass who ran with her. I was never pro-McCain, always anti-Obama.
I hope J.D. Hayworth decides to run against him in 2010 and beats the snot out of him. Time to pack it up, McCain.
jennifernaz on January 22, 2009 at 2:22 PM
so she is either bagging on Palin or really bagging on her RINO daddy for picking her…..lol
I can’t even comprehend the landslide BHO would have had without Palin to inspire anyone to vote Republican…..
SDarchitect on January 22, 2009 at 2:23 PM
OT: Megan does have very nice breasts.
Palin 2012.
Firebird on January 22, 2009 at 2:23 PM
Let’s review the situation again… McCain’s advisors started trashing Palin even before the campaign ended by saying she didn’t know where Africa was and was a raving b*tch anonymously and then denying it in public. Palin responded by defending herself and criticizing certain aspects of the McCain campaign herself. She has also not publicly trashed McCain, unlike Joe the Plumber who should have been more gracious to the guy who brought from unclogging pipe obscurity to commenting on Fox News shows.
Illinidiva on January 22, 2009 at 2:24 PM
When has Palin ever publicly criticized McCain?
Wethal on January 22, 2009 at 2:24 PM
That was Rudy’s daughter.
SnarkVader on January 22, 2009 at 2:24 PM
Sarah bashing by proxy .. new low here .. thanks AP ..
redrock on January 22, 2009 at 2:25 PM
Just a casual estimation, but by the looks of things here, you guys are well past the ‘even’ mark when it comes to who has done more abuse to whom.
I wouldn’t be surprised to see here if one day, when McCain passes on, that the same treatment that the liberals showed Ronald Reagan at his passing would be shown to the evil hated McCain here. If what I’ve been witnessing over the past month is any indication. And no, McCain is nowhere near the great man Reagan is (as I’m sure some people would willfully make an incorrect connection that was my implication, and that’s incorrect.)
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 2:26 PM
Mondale, Ferraro, Bentsen, Quayle, Kemp, Leiberman, Edwards.
Don’t see anyone blaming them for their ticket losing.
InterestedObserver on January 22, 2009 at 2:26 PM
You might want to take your own advice there JetBoy. McCain lost it all by himself. He avoided the biggest landslide loss in history just by picking her.
R D on January 22, 2009 at 2:26 PM
First of all, when Roberts says that Palin has been “critical” of McCain’s campaign, he seems to be implying that she was critical of McCain. I haven’t ever heard her speak poorly of McCain himself. Most people agree that she was mishandled by the campaign, not to mention mistreated by some of the staffers. Meghan does say a few kind words about Palin, but meshes nicely with her father’s absence of comment about the Palin part of McCain-Palin, as well. It seems clear McCain isn’t interested in defending Palin, and its likely he will be engaged in some (typically) indefensible activities in the near term.
littleguy on January 22, 2009 at 2:27 PM
she criticized her rollout and said it could’ve been better, the Couric Interview setup
jp on January 22, 2009 at 2:27 PM
perfect
joey24007 on January 22, 2009 at 2:27 PM
She should–she’s hefty enough.
Palin/Petreaus 2012.
Jenfidel on January 22, 2009 at 2:27 PM
Her it goes:
Palin vs. Biden…
Biden was brought in to give “credibility” and “longevity” to Obama’s campaign. Biden’s job was no to “muck” it up, not to “step in it” and when he did, they just removed him from the campaign. They dismissed it with a “you have known him for decades, you don’t need access”. His role as Veep was completely different then Palin’s. He is a professional campaigner, a bit of a joke, but still a campaigner.
Palin was brought in to “save” McCain’s campaign, when she “mis-stepped” they couldn’t afford to have her sit out.
Her role was completely different from Biden, she was the “star”, she was the draw, but she had to support McCain, while leading the charge. Everything she did was magnified, because she ended being the voice, and it took much away from McCain. When her handlers say “watch out for direct questions, they are traps”, she listened. So when Couric said “what do you read?” she knew the follow up would be, “Oh, you read the NYT, what was on the front page today, or who are your favorite writers, etc….it would have just opened up a line of “discovery”.
Palin’s role was an impossible role, to save a dying campaign…and to make an “un-charismatic” candidate, charismatic.
And of course McCain with each of his mis-steps (suspending his campaign) it just showed all the more the huge gap between two people…Biden could sit out until the story blew over, Palin couldn’t afford to sit out, she was driving the campaign with her energy, intelligence, ambition, and her connection with the voters…McCain had name recognition and was a honored Veteran.
right2bright on January 22, 2009 at 2:27 PM
I’ve repeatedly said nice things about Palin…I like her, admire her, but always said she was the wrong pick for veep.
Either way, McCain didn’t win. And Republicans bashed McCain more than the Dem’s or the left ever did.
JetBoy on January 22, 2009 at 2:28 PM
The little lass enjoys the limelight. The most certain path to staying there is drawing out the Palin issue by being coy,…..but, like a virgin at a frat party, she’ll eventually have to give it up for the good of the country,…. or something. Daddy is presently in the process of pissing off everyone who voted for him, so she can’t hold out much longer. 1-2 months, max, or she’ll lose her audience.
a capella on January 22, 2009 at 2:28 PM
Petty jealousy as Palin became more popular that Presidential nominee McCain.
danking70 on January 22, 2009 at 2:29 PM
Exactly! I was so half-hearted in my support for McCain, it was more voting against BarryO than for Mcain, until that moment that Sarah arrived in Ohio.
It would have been HUGE without her.
JamesLee on January 22, 2009 at 2:29 PM
Please. I’m sure there’s some MDS posters on this site, as there are PDS-ers and ODS-ers, and BDS-ers. But my criticism was entirely in the political realm; it’s not MDS to offer tough political criticism.
Pasalubong on January 22, 2009 at 2:29 PM
She’s angry that Palin generated a buzz about her father that he was never able to do for himself. I’ve nothing against political bloggers, but I have yet to see why Meghan is supposed to be relevant.
Sir Corky on January 22, 2009 at 2:30 PM
I admire McCain as a person and a war hero and believe that he will be remembered as such when he passes. I don’t admire the little pissy game that he played with Bush during Bush’s first term(although Bush didn’t come out looking good from it either). I also don’t admire how he and his campaign have gone out of their way to throw Sarah Palin, the woman they chose to be VP, under the bus after the election. McCain ran a poor disorganized campaign and he and his people should be taking more hits for their effort than they are. Instead, it seem that the media meme is that Palin somehow cost McCain the election.
Illinidiva on January 22, 2009 at 2:30 PM
She’s angry that Palin generated a buzz about her father that he was never able to do for himself. I have yet to see why Meghan is supposed to be relevant.
Sir Corky on January 22, 2009 at 2:31 PM
Some gift. Getting the hell beat out of you for three months while the people who are supposed be on your team don’t lift a finger to help.
It must kill McCain that we were (and will be) with Sarah and against Obama. But for the actions of Nicolle Wallace and company, McCain would have been a non-entity in his own campaign.
Nat Hound on January 22, 2009 at 2:31 PM
BTW, sorry for the double post, my internet switched off and I didn’t realize my first post made it through before it did.
Sir Corky on January 22, 2009 at 2:32 PM
McCain is a huge disappointment. I liked him before 2000, came to dislike him once I “got to know” him during the primaries prior to that election, hated his guts after that, learned to appreciate him again after he won the nomination, and now, I can’t stand him again.
It’s like that old agents’ joke: Who’s Tom Cruise? Get me a Tom Cruise lookalike. Get me Tom Cruise! Get me a young Tom Cruise! Who’s Tom Cruise?
capitalist piglet on January 22, 2009 at 2:32 PM
Hmmmm…..
YAWWWWWWNNNNSSSSSS….
upinak on January 22, 2009 at 2:33 PM
Here’s where the “derangement” comes in. McCain never used the GOP as his “punching bag”. Heck, he’s done more to advance Republican ideals than most in the Senate.
It was McCain who was the “punching bag” for too many Republicans. And apparently, he…and his daughter now, still are.
JetBoy on January 22, 2009 at 2:33 PM
I’m more of a naive slow poke, than I’d care to admit, but I must admit it. I was pulling for McCain, and did indeed vote for him. Now I wished I had just stayed home.
He tries to rush the voting, and acceptance of Hillary, even though Republican colleagues show hesitance. Then he, and Graham are patting Obama on the back, for his closing Guantanamo.
We were in the rock and hard place situation no matter who won! I feel like we dodged a bullet, but got run over by the tank!
capejasmine on January 22, 2009 at 2:33 PM
Excellent! More differentiation between the ball-less moderate GOP and the sturdy conservative GOP. Only further helps Sarah.
Now Sarah needs to start her 2012 campaign and be relentlessly vocal. No one else has the balls to do so.
ErinF on January 22, 2009 at 2:34 PM
Heck, he’s done more to advance Republican ideals than most in the Senate.
What planet do you live on?
BillyRayValentine on January 22, 2009 at 2:34 PM
Hoo-kay…
Pasalubong on January 22, 2009 at 2:35 PM
Even if Palin hadn’t goofed up with Katie Couric, the media would have just focused on McCain suspending his campaign. That was dumb enough to doom him anyway. Unless of course, VP Mitt Romney told McCain to not be a dipshit and not make such a big deal about the bailout.
Speedwagon82 on January 22, 2009 at 2:36 PM
No it’s not. But read some of the comments here. It’s moving beyond just political criticism. Someone makes a claim about McCain and theres no proof? GUILTY! – Obama does what Obama planned to do and McCain wanted to do and Bush wanted to do, as in close GITMO? EXACTLY LIKE OBAMA! – Someone asks McCains daughter about Palin and she doesn’t want to comment? SHE HATES HER, JUST LIKE HER TRAITOR DAD!!!!
It’s just upsetting to see some of us using the same tactics that were used against republicans over the years. And that is – believing the worse without any proof, and then coming down on the non-believers who don’t want to drink this koolaid and will actually give the republican the benefit of the doubt until there is some evidence to convict him. That’s all. Not too much to ask for.
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 2:36 PM
Like what Republican ideals???
Time for you to stop huffing paint, J.B. and get some help.
Jenfidel on January 22, 2009 at 2:36 PM
Not yours, that’s for sure. What color is the sky in your world? In ours, the sky is blue.
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 2:37 PM
Too bad for this chick that she got stuck with her father’s looks rather than her mother’s looks.
Aren’t her 15 minutes up yet?
BuckeyeSam on January 22, 2009 at 2:38 PM
wise_man, you are the most shameless McCain apologist I’ve ever seen!
Are you really Lindsay Graham?
Jenfidel on January 22, 2009 at 2:38 PM
This election should teach us to never pick a more exciting person for VP than for POTUS. Look at 2004 with the Democrats. Edwards was the only thing really inspiring the nutroots back then. It made the ticket too disjointed.
Speedwagon82 on January 22, 2009 at 2:40 PM
And here I thought the loss had something to do with the tanking economy, corrupt GOP legislators, incredibly unpopular incumbent, and extremely charismatic opponent. Silly me. It must have been the woman that generated more buzz, donations, and good will in a day than McCain did in the whole of the primaries. My mistake. Simply MUST get rid of that nasty MDS.
/eyeroll
TheUnrepentantGeek on January 22, 2009 at 2:40 PM
When has Palin ever had an unkind thing to say about McCain? Or are facts not all that important to you?
Yes, Miss McCain only voted for Kerry in 2004.
Esthier on January 22, 2009 at 2:41 PM
I hear “Wedding Crashers” is his favorite movie.
Nat Hound on January 22, 2009 at 2:42 PM
I’m not a McCain apologist. I just happen to like this thing called the truth. And evidence. Before I trash another republican. You guys should look into it.
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 2:42 PM
I always go the impression the Miss McCain really enjoyed the limelight… like she was auditioning for something. Looks like she still may be.
I say, put her in the next Big Brother (or any other god-forsaken reality show of your choice.)
creatocon on January 22, 2009 at 2:42 PM
Was that you trying to be funny?
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 2:42 PM
She is a jerk like her father.
Why is she relevant? Is this the best Columbia University has to offer?
jencab on January 22, 2009 at 2:43 PM
Considering how quickly McCain flopped over to Obama I am not surprised that his clan harbor ill will towards Sarah. Sarah held them to a higher standard during the campaign. Something Washington insiders can’t tolerate. They have to remain pliable and wishy washy to play their games. Sarah shone like a strong Conservative beacon and let’s face it Johnny Mac, like all politicians, couldn’t stand the light.
Guardian on January 22, 2009 at 2:43 PM
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 2:36 PM
Pasalubong on January 22, 2009 at 2:43 PM
That says more about you than about the family.
McCain sucked wind as a candidate. But he was the Republicans’ choice. It seems a little fickle to now have so many people deriding him.
The Race Card on January 22, 2009 at 2:43 PM
She’s a pudgy little thang, ain’t she?
clnurnberg on January 22, 2009 at 2:44 PM
Not yours, that’s for sure. What color is the sky in your world? In ours, the sky is blue.
So it’s kind of like the planet I live on, called Earth.
I’m guessing on your planet, McCain is a minor diety who does no wrong and is loved by all.
BillyRayValentine on January 22, 2009 at 2:44 PM
i’ll say it again: the imagined soap opera psychodrama of palin’s torment and abuse by mccain concocted by palin deification syndrome sufferers closely resembles the jennifer anniston/brangelina storyline running through the celebrity magazines.
eh on January 22, 2009 at 2:45 PM
I don’t regret my vote for McCain, as it came down to two choices. But, since he isn’t interested in helping identify the scum in his campaign who trashed Palin, I’d advocate the Israeli approach for the next campaign: don’t hire any of the McCain people ever again, period, exclamation point.
littleguy on January 22, 2009 at 2:45 PM
What? You didn’t like your man’s starring role as “Senator McCain” in the wedding reception scene?
Nat Hound on January 22, 2009 at 2:46 PM
She said she got to know her and that she liked her and that she had a beautiful family.
And you all interpret that to mean she doesn’t like her?
Maybe she isn’t commenting on Palin out of respect.
bridgetown on January 22, 2009 at 2:47 PM
McCain called upon Palin when his floundering campaign was sinking then he abandoned her. McCain is a loser in more ways than one.
rplat on January 22, 2009 at 2:47 PM
I’ve been consistent in my admonitions of nominating a five-foot-six, old-dude, with an anti-Republican streak. I agree, it would have been nice to knock him down before trotting him out as the candidate of choice.
The only good that can come of nominating McCain is that future candidates will seem virile and fresh-faced in comparison.
***
The Palin slobber fest is getting old though. She still needs to prove her mettle. As it stands, she is no more than an reactionary rallying point to the Obama fervor. The whining about media coverage is quite wussified.
It will be great when Republicans drop the VPILF and “hot grandma” talking points and let this woman show us if she’s worthy of a nomination in 2016.
Maybe Cornyn will convince her to run on his ticket. Or the sleeper ticket…Sessions/Palin 2012.
The Race Card on January 22, 2009 at 2:48 PM
The McCain camp literally locked her away in a hotel. In Philadelphia. For a week. In the heart of the fall campaign.
Her only two appearances that week: an Irish Pub and Geno’s Steaks.
Some concoction.
Nat Hound on January 22, 2009 at 2:50 PM
Jet, I think you’re awesome, but I really have to disagree with you here. There are policy differences I have with McCain, but I was always more bothered by how he always seemed to take delight in doing the exact opposite of what Republicans wanted.
Esthier on January 22, 2009 at 2:50 PM
Worthy being defined as…?
littleguy on January 22, 2009 at 2:51 PM
Nope. Not at all. You’re wrong.
You know, I could avoid a lot of grief here if I simply agreed with people like you that McCain is the evil traitor lying deceiving Palin hating Obama loving man that you all say he is.
But why don’t I? I mean, I could keep quite. But this isn’t what I believe. I could go with the flow and agree with you lot, and even make up some falsehoods about him as well, you know, to have lots of fun with the whole ‘McCain traitor’ thing. But this isn’t what I believe.
I suppose this sort of group think here is what is the path to least resistance. Maybe thats what you would all like.
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 2:52 PM
Ditto.
With regard to Meghan McCain, during the campaign she wrote frequently about how much she liked Sarah and the entire Palin family, etc. Her refusal to talk now is odd.
___________
RJGatorEsq. on January 22, 2009 at 2:52 PM
20 lashes for insolence.
Any comment about Palin not referring to her as a deity is an attack.
The Race Card on January 22, 2009 at 2:53 PM
Whenever you’re ready to talk to the actual people on this blog rather than the cartoon characters in your head, we’ll be right here.
TheUnrepentantGeek on January 22, 2009 at 2:53 PM
“Take delight?” Quite an emotional reaction to politics. Why, in your mind would McCain take delight in being a member of the republican party, and then do ‘the exact opposite’ of what republican wanted. I mean, is he been lying his entire career? or is there another reasonable explanation.
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 2:53 PM
And yet you produce neither in your copious comments.
Quite a hollow boast!
Jenfidel on January 22, 2009 at 2:54 PM
No way McCain gets sent back to the Senate next go round.
No way.
noblejones on January 22, 2009 at 2:54 PM
“The truth” and “evidence” are enough for me.
wise_man on January 22, 2009 at 2:55 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 Next »