Gran Torino, Dark Knight shut out at the Oscars

posted at 12:30 pm on January 22, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

Don’t get me wrong — I thought Benjamin Button was a good, entertaining film, but it’s hardly comparable to The Godfather or Schindler’s List.  Hollywood thinks otherwise, giving Button an eyebrow-raising 13 nominations:

The romantic fantasy “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button” led Academy Awards contenders Thursday with 13 nominations, among them best picture and acting honors for Brad Pitt and Taraji P. Henson, and a directing slot for David Fincher.

Other best-picture nominees are “Frost/Nixon,” “Milk,” “The Reader” and “Slumdog Millionaire.”

As expected, Heath Ledger had a supporting-actor nomination for “The Dark Knight” on the one-year anniversary of his death from an accidental overdose of prescription drugs. But the Batman blockbuster was shut out from other top categories such as best picture and director. …

Notably snubbed in the acting categories were Clint Eastwood for “Gran Torino,” Sally Hawkins for “Happy-Go-Lucky” and Kristin Scott Thomas for “I’ve Loved You So Long.”

Doubt picked up four of the 20 acting nominations, with Meryl Streep extending her record to 15 nominations, this time as a Best Actress finalist, and Amy Adams, Viola Davis, and Philip Seymour Hoffman for supporting roles.  This, like Button, was an actor’s film, and it had stellar peformances across the board.  I’m also not surprised to see it honored, given its ties to the scandals of the Catholic Church over the past few years, but am a little surprised not to see it nominated for Best Picture.  Two of the five contenders for the big prize are explicitly political, which keeps in the Oscar tradition.

As for The Dark Knight, its exclusion doesn’t bother me as much. It’s a good comic-book film, perhaps one of the best, but it’s still just a comic-book film.  That genre doesn’t get much respect from Hollywood except at the box office, even with a great performance by the late Heath Ledger.

Likewise, the shutout of Gran Torino does not surprise me.  The politics of the movie run counter to Hollywood’s taste for the most part, although the theme of the futility of vigilante justice should have gained it some notice.  I think Gran Torino is easily a better movie than Button, and for that matter, so is Doubt.  Both have more conflict, more drama, and more reality than the elegiac Button.  The only conclusion I can reach is that Oscar voters didn’t get it, and got too hung up on the rough edges of Eastwood’s Walt Kowalski.  Either that, or they were too busy fawning over the politics of Frost/Nixon and Milk to notice.

Update (AP): Here’s your presumptive winner for Best Picture.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Let’s face it, it was a weak year for actual, good movies.

Entertaining, perhaps… but not good.

Abby Adams on January 22, 2009 at 12:34 PM

Who gives a flip? All of hollyweird sucks, and their endless awards shows mean nothing.

ErinF on January 22, 2009 at 12:35 PM

I saw ‘Iron Man’ at the Imax last year and watched BK on a plane to Hawaii, other than that, you couldn’t have made me go to a theatre if you put a shotgun to my head.

More self-congratulatory pap from the dumbest people in America.

Bishop on January 22, 2009 at 12:35 PM

I haven’t seen that Button movie yet. But thanks to AP’s update, maybe I have.

Weight of Glory on January 22, 2009 at 12:36 PM

Abby Adams on January 22, 2009 at 12:34 PM

Aren’t most years like that? Everything has already been made. All they can do is redo the characters.

lorien1973 on January 22, 2009 at 12:40 PM

The Oscars exist for the actors, when the ratings tank and it becomes a money losing enterprise (this will take awhile Oscar voters won’t budge until the loss of viewers makes the awards show a ratings catastrophe) then they’ll start to think twice, until then it is business as usual.

Theworldisnotenough on January 22, 2009 at 12:40 PM

Dark Knight already won best picture where it counts. Of course the Hollywood elites won’t praise a movie that the common people already crowned king for the year through capitalism.

Chubbs65 on January 22, 2009 at 12:40 PM

Meh… Button’s just a proxy for Milk and Frost/Nixon which will win the bulk of the awards.

The only REAL inspired pick was Robert Downey Jr. for Tropic Thunder. – “Never go full retard”.

Skywise on January 22, 2009 at 12:40 PM

As for The Dark Knight, its exclusion doesn’t bother me as much. It’s a good comic-book film, perhaps one of the best, but it’s still just a comic-book film. That genre doesn’t get much respect from Hollywood except at the box office, even with a great performance by the late Heath Ledger.

Was it really a comic book film though? I thought it was a decent allegory to the WOT.

lorien1973 on January 22, 2009 at 12:41 PM

“Funny or die” is for the books. I haven’t laughed so hard in a loooong time!
Having watched both movies, it is really very Curious that the two are so smiler.

Yitzchokm on January 22, 2009 at 12:42 PM

Skywise on January 22, 2009 at 12:40 PM

Tropic Thunder was okay. But the ideas in the movie are better than the actual movie, itself. I guess that’s why it disappointed me.

First time I liked Tom Cruise, in a very long time, though.

lorien1973 on January 22, 2009 at 12:42 PM

Like I mentioned in the other thread, the one surprise I’m seeing is that no one is mentioning Robert Downey Jr.’s nomination for Tropic Thunder. Wasn’t there an article not too long ago that said that his nomination in this week of all weeks would be in bad form?

ScoopPC11 on January 22, 2009 at 12:42 PM

Let’s face it, it was a weak year decade for actual, good movies.

Entertaining, perhaps… but not good.

Abby Adams on January 22, 2009 at 12:34 PM

The annual Hollywood Self Congratulatory CJ to tell each other how wonderful they are never fails to make me sick. The Obama adulation this year will increase the smug factor by 10.

Bonus points will be awarded if you can accept an award, give the One a tongue bath, and take a cheap shot at Bush in under 90 seconds.

Sean Penn is the odds on favorite.

BigWyo on January 22, 2009 at 12:43 PM

Uh yeah, big surprise.
Clint Eastwood already showed that he has bigger cajones than Spike Lee…that’s all that matters.

HornetSting on January 22, 2009 at 12:43 PM

The Dark Knight, Ledger’s performance as The Joker, in particular, was overhyped. Not that it was a bad movie, it just should have been much better.

bryanmyrick on January 22, 2009 at 12:43 PM

That genre doesn’t get much respect from Hollywood except at the box office, even with a great performance by the late Heath Ledger.

Ledger’s performance was the only thing worthy of a nod from the Dark Knight.

A fun movie, and it looked great; but, there were a few too may bits of hokey.

yo on January 22, 2009 at 12:44 PM

Since when is Hollywood held to any standards of realistic art or entertainment? Contemporary movies are showing up free for view faster than films from thirty years ago. It’s manure processing with the same progressive, anti-American faces ad naseum.

Gran Torino is the only film of the last year that I am waiting to watch.

Hening on January 22, 2009 at 12:44 PM

let’s face it, the beliefs of hollywood as to what’s good always run counter to what the public thinks is good

if the oscars determined the most popular movies then brokeback mountain would’ve made 210 million since it was such an ‘incredible film’

Defector01 on January 22, 2009 at 12:45 PM

I could really care less about the Osars, I haven’t watched it (o any other awards show) in years as it’s just one of many Hollyweird circle jerks these egomaniac America hating ingrates put on every two months or more!

Personally I’m not surprised Dark Knight got left out, it wasn’t a very good movie IMHO, however Gran Torino shouldn’t have been left out, but then again Gran Torino has more of a conservative theme to it so it’s not so surprising it got snubbed by the far left Hollyweird elites!

Liberty or Death on January 22, 2009 at 12:45 PM

Are you sure Gran Torino wasn’t passed over because it doesn’t qualify for 2008? It didn’t hit general release until Jan 2009.

phelps on January 22, 2009 at 12:47 PM

Ledger should not get rewarded with an oscar just because he overdosed.

Philip Seymour Hoffman gives a wonderful perfomance.

Gran Torino was a good movie, but not Oscar worthy. Neither was Benjamin Button, way too much CGI. Brad Pitt’s performance certainly was oscar worthy.

I think we movie lovers should go see Richard Jenkins in the VISITOR. Character actor extraordinaire who has his shot at the BIG TIME.

originalpechanga on January 22, 2009 at 12:48 PM

Tropic Thunder was okay. But the ideas in the movie are better than the actual movie, itself. I guess that’s why it disappointed me.

First time I liked Tom Cruise, in a very long time, though.

lorien1973 on January 22, 2009 at 12:42 PM

Agreed. The opening was great, Downey Jr. was great, the guy playing the movie director was great, Cruise was great… the rest…ehhh…

Skywise on January 22, 2009 at 12:48 PM

I like what I like. I don’t care which films Hollywood fawns over. The Dark Knight was the best picture of the year for me; if you have Blu-ray, I know that you probably already have TDK, and love it. Like Fincher (Zodiac), Christopher Nolan impresses me; I’ll watch/buy their well crafted movies.
Most Hollywood films are trash.

Doug on January 22, 2009 at 12:49 PM

Until they have a gazillion awards shows for plumber, or carpenter, of the year, or some other job that actually helps America, I wont watch these overpaid intellectually bankrupt dolts.

MDWNJ on January 22, 2009 at 12:49 PM

Gave up caring about the Oscar’s when the Greatest Love Story Ever Told lost out for Best Picture to a disgusting movie about an psycho who tortures and eats people. How can you make sense of people like this?

Tommy_G on January 22, 2009 at 12:50 PM

Disgraceful that The Dark Knight isn’t up for best picture.

nickj116 on January 22, 2009 at 12:51 PM

We need a superhero film with an evil governor of a state way up north fighting some global warming efforts by a handsome overweight black guy who, it is later discovered, is a super hero. In a flashback, it is shown that he got his powers by hope, a foreign father and basketball. Just for a twist, let us make the governor a beautiful, conservative female who offends a gay state police detective who later saves the superhero who, in turn, organizes the community to accomplish the dreams of their fathers. The scene of the polar bears and wolves alone could guarantee an Oscar!

Any similarity to persons living or dead is purely coincidential.

IlikedAUH2O on January 22, 2009 at 12:52 PM

Why do we even give a rip?

The Oscars, the Grammys, etc., are nothing more than big orgies of self-congratulations for liberals who want to feel important. It’s been decades since artistic merit actually had anything to do with these awards. Better to just ignore this crap than to get worked up over the nominations.

Hell, if anything, it’s almost a badge of honor for movies like Gran Torino to not be nominated.

thirteen28 on January 22, 2009 at 12:52 PM

Dark Knight is more than a comic book film, alot more.

and its a Political Allegory favorable to Bush, that some Lib publications picked up on and did not like because of it. Thats why it got snubbed, like Gran Torino.

Check out DirtyHarry’s archives on the subject.

jp on January 22, 2009 at 12:53 PM

I have seen Gran Torino several times on http://www.justin.tv and also watched Benjamin Button, Milk, Frost/Nixon, and Doubt. GT was easily the best. Button was mildly interesting because of its backward history, but nothing more. Milk was a well-acted and scripted propaganda piece that unfortunately will convince many teens of the “righteousness” of the gay movement. Nixon seemed boring to me. Doubt was good.

mydh12 on January 22, 2009 at 12:54 PM

Was it really a comic book film though? I thought it was a decent allegory to the WOT.

lorien1973 on January 22, 2009 at 12:41 PM

Yet another reason why it couldn’t be nominated.

Esthier on January 22, 2009 at 12:54 PM

The Dark Knight and Gran Torino were too non-liberal to have had any hope of nominations, esp. this year. But that doesn’t mean Button takes it. The Academy, chock full o’ Obama supporters, may well vote for the exotic underdog — Slumdog Millionaire.

Karl on January 22, 2009 at 12:54 PM

from the Washington Indpendent:

http://dirtyharrysplace.com/?p=3064

Insofar as it’s possible to view an action movie that had the biggest three-day-opening in cinematic history as a comment on the current national-security debate, “The Dark Knight” weighs in strongly on the side of the Bush administration. Confronting the Joker, a nihilistic enemy whose motives are both unexplained and beside the point, the Batman faces his biggest dilemma yet: whether to abuse his power in order to save Gotham City. Again and again in the movie, the Batman’s moral hand-wringing results in the deaths of innocents. Only by becoming like the monster he must vanquish can Batman secure a victory that even he understands is Pyrrhic.

Batman, the film’s hero, played by Christian Bale, sees this as a morally devastating paradox. Dick Cheney and his ideological allies in the Bush administration, however, clearly view this as a righteous challenge. Cheney, Addington, Donald Rumsfeld, Alberto Gonzales, John Yoo, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith and others can go to to this sixth Batman movie to see, in the Joker, as played by Heath Ledger, a perfect reflection of their view of Al Qaeda. He presents an enemy unbounded by any scruple; striking out for no rational reason; hell-bent on causing civilization-threatening destruction, and emboldened by any adversaries’ restraint.

President George W. Bush, as Jane Mayer of The New Yorker writes in her recent book “The Dark Side,” believed that the problem facing the U.S. was that Osama bin Laden “didn’t feel threatened” by it. Attempting to understand Al Qaeda in order to confront it on its own terms was the stuff of the weak and the unsure — part of the problem, in other words. The Bush administration instead set out, in a morally Manichean way, to ensure that the U.S. became as fearsome as possible.

many liberals got the allegory right off the bat, it didn’t just take Andrew Klavan to write it up in the WSJ.

They even used 9/11 linked imagery with Batman on top of the rubble, ala bush

jp on January 22, 2009 at 12:57 PM

and would Ledger have got a Nod, if not for dying and previously being the star in Brokeback Mountain?

jp on January 22, 2009 at 12:58 PM

Dirty Harry’s(John Nolte of Big Hollywod) review while I’m at it:

http://dirtyharrysplace.com/?p=2967

jp on January 22, 2009 at 1:00 PM

Funny, Gran Torino and Dark Knight are the ones I´ll watch more than once and will buy on DVD. Haven´t seen Slumdog Millionaire yet.

el gordo on January 22, 2009 at 1:01 PM

How many for Sisterhood of the Travelling Pants 2?

Chuck Schick on January 22, 2009 at 1:02 PM

and would Ledger have got a Nod, if not for dying and previously being the star in Brokeback Mountain?

jp on January 22, 2009 at 12:58 PM

Actually didn’t like the way he played that role. He didn’t even do as good a job as John Astin. And don’t get me stared to Brokeback Mountain.

Tommy_G on January 22, 2009 at 1:02 PM

Look at the movies they’ve nominated in the past ten years. Most of them are forgotten already.

That’s been par for course for a while now so I suspect the Oscars wouldn’t know a good movie if they tried.

The Dark Knight was the best movie I saw last year – it was perfect, no movie is, but I simply thought it was the best movie (except for Maggie what’s-her-name who was a total drag). Button felt like it was 13 hours long….

mjk on January 22, 2009 at 1:04 PM

For my money, Iron Man had something that Dark Knight (while an excellent movie) lacked – heart. No pun intended, for those who’ll know.

creatocon on January 22, 2009 at 1:04 PM

There was nothing for Batman Begins, and now nothing for the Dark Knight. The Oscars are worthless.

OneGyT on January 22, 2009 at 1:05 PM

and would Ledger have got a Nod, if not for dying and previously being the star in Brokeback Mountain?

Nope. But that’s because he died. It was an incredible, creepy performance, but it was in a “comic book” movie. And thus not worthy of an Oscar nomination.

Because they must save their adulation for Nazis and people of alternative lifestyles.

mjk on January 22, 2009 at 1:07 PM

I think it’s funny how the second highest grossing movie ever isn’t nominated while a liberal (SP) movie like MILK loses $20 million and gets tons of nominations. What a bunch of BS!

jparks1972 on January 22, 2009 at 1:10 PM

What did you expect? Oscars go to the politically correct. The only reason Heath Ledger got nominated is because he died. Any doubt to his nomination was erased because 1) he played the villain and Hollywood doesn’t recognize villains that are not Republicans and 2) Brokeback Mountain still hasn’t become passee yet. After this year’s Oscars then it will be. Therefore, I think Milk will win best picture. If McCain won the Presidency, then Frost/Nixon definitely would get it. The only shot it has now is if some political crisis erupts and Hollywood needs to remind people that Republicans are evil, more so than usual.

hadsil on January 22, 2009 at 1:10 PM

Because they must save their adulation for Nazis and people of alternative lifestyles.

mjk on January 22, 2009 at 1:07 PM

And that is why Hollywood ‘people’ has no opinion worth merit.
They are fools & tools.

Badger40 on January 22, 2009 at 1:10 PM

Gran Torino? What a dumb movie, the trailer makes it out like Clint is about to go all out vigilante, instead it has next to no action and the climatic scene is Clint getting shot dead – absolutely stupid and depressing.

The Dark Knight – decent and well made but overly hyped as one of the greatest movies of all time. It was too long, too dark (yes I know it is the Dark Knight) and not something I really wanted to watch again. I actually found Iron Man more entertaining.

If anything one of the best action movies of the year was Rambo, which surprised the hell out of me as I had low expectations.

Poptech on January 22, 2009 at 1:11 PM

I finally got to watch both Batman Begins and the Dark Knight (although I have yet to finish the latter). Excellent, excellent movies. I didn’t finish tDK because it bothered me so much, the anarchic violence of the Joker. I’ll finish it this weekend, when my husband comes home.

It was robbed. As I said in the headlines, though, Oscars aren’t about great movies, but about Hollywood ass-kissing.

Anna on January 22, 2009 at 1:12 PM

Was Gran Torino even eligible? The nomination ballots were mailed in late December, and the film wasn’t even released until January 9th.

Tanya on January 22, 2009 at 1:13 PM

The most profitable movies of the year:

2008 DOMESTIC GROSSES

1. The Dark Knight
2. Iron Man
3. Indiana Jones

…enough said.

Poptech on January 22, 2009 at 1:15 PM

Nope. But that’s because he died. It was an incredible, creepy performance, but it was in a “comic book” movie. And thus not worthy of an Oscar nomination.

Because they must save their adulation for Nazis and people of alternative lifestyles.

Rules for winning an acting Oscar:

Play a famous person in a biopic – Hollywood loves these

Play a drunk, druggie or someone with an incurable disease.

If you are a beautiful woman – play an ugly one

Stay away from comedy roles – Oscar hates teh funny

Stay away from fantasy/sci-fi – Oscar likes to keep it real

Anybody else want to add some?

Ellen on January 22, 2009 at 1:18 PM

Films have to be campaigned for to be nominated for Oscars. If Batmen and the rest never campaigned for, they would never be considered.

csdeven on January 22, 2009 at 1:20 PM

I thought that both the Dark Knight and Gran Torino were very good movies, but not quite Oscar caliber. Couple of notes:

…the Oscar voters love Clint Eastwood. He’s got 2 best director Oscars for Unforgiven and Million Dollar Baby. He also has 2 additional best director nominations (4 in all) for Letters From Iwo Jima and Mystic River. In addition, he has 2 best actor nominations for Unforgiven and Million Dollar Baby. By contrast, Spike Lee (uber liberal himself) has one writing nomination for Do The Right Thing. Facts, Hornet, facts.

…I think some of you are reading way more into the Dark Knight regarding it being an allegory for the GWOT than Christopher Nolan intended. Recurring themes in his movies relate to the fine line between justice and vengeance, the cost of vengeance, moral uncertainty and insanity. If you liked the Dark Knight and aren’t otherwise that familiar with Nolan, check out The Prestige and Memento. He’s a great director.

dakine on January 22, 2009 at 1:21 PM

Thanks for spoiling Gran Torino for me poptech – jeez!

Yossarian on January 22, 2009 at 1:28 PM

It’s clear that politics dictated what was nominated for Best Picture:

Frost/Nixon – A good movie with great performances that centers around the most reviled President in the Hollywood community not named Bush. Even though Nixon is portrayed somewhat sympathetically, it’s obvious Oscar material.

Milk – Anti-Prop 8 sentiment fueled this one. It won’t win Best Picture, but my biggest fear is that the voters will reward Sean Penn with Best Actor over Mickey Rourke’s incredible performance in The Wrestler in order to send a message to those who voted in favor of Prop 8. And Rourke’s anti-Hollywood and pro-Bush statements from the past won’t help matters.

The Reader – Its subject is the Holocaust. Need I say more. Hell, Kate Winslet even poked fun at that with Ricky Gervais in Extras. Make a Holocaust movie. Win an Oscar. Even a child rapist like Roman Polanski was able to get a Best Director trophy by tackling that topic. What pisses me off about this Best Picture nod more than anything is that The Reader is widely regarding as an average movie with excellent performances, yet it’s picked over something like The Dark Knight which was universally loved by critics and moviegoers.

As far as the other categories, I don’t really care much about them. I am rooting for Heath Ledger for Best Supporting Actor and Mickey Rourke for Best Actor. Otherwise, wake me when it’s over and Slumdog Millionaire walks away with Best Picture and Best Director(it’s a virtual lock, people).

Oh, and it’s an absolute travesty that Bruce Springsteen wasn’t nominated for the title song from The Wrestler. I don’t care if he’s a flaming lib. That piece of music is one of the greatest movie tunes I’ve ever heard.

Doughboy on January 22, 2009 at 1:35 PM

Ellen, I take your point, but I think you exaggerate for impact. A few Best Picture (won or nominated) exceptions to your rules on funny and scif (really true on scifi I think, less true on funny and most are lite/romantic/family comedies):

The Sting
One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest
Moonstruck
Hairspray
Mary Poppins
American Graffiti
Juno
Little Miss Sunshine
Sideways
Lost in Translation
Babe
Full Monty
Sixth Sense
ET
All 3 LOR movies

You’re generally right though…Oscar voters really, really like serious.

dakine on January 22, 2009 at 1:36 PM

Doughboy, hard to disagree with just about anything in your last post. I do think Rourke will win, and deservedly so.

dakine on January 22, 2009 at 1:38 PM

“It’s exactly like Gump, except no AIDS.”

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA

bilups on January 22, 2009 at 1:50 PM

Poptech on January 22, 2009 at 1:15 PM

Indiana Jones completely disproves your point. That movie was awful. I wish to forget it ever happened.

lorien1973 on January 22, 2009 at 2:05 PM

Holly-where, Holly-who?????

dmann on January 22, 2009 at 2:08 PM

I loved Gran Torino, but I would hardly consider it worth recognition for any special acting, filming or directing honors.

The only one in the movie giving a professional acting performance was Eastwood. He was very good, of course, but not really not stretching too far from many other things he’s done in the past. Everyone else was wooden or worse. And a lot of the scripting was simply dreadful.

The ideology was more in tune with mine and so I was really able to dig in and enjoy. That, however, does not a great movie make.

Shawn_NH on January 22, 2009 at 2:10 PM

There was a time when the Academy Awards had an air of dignity to them.

But for the last couple of years, the Motion Picture Association and whoever it is that does all the nominating ignore the really good films that film goers enjoyed and instead gives high honors to films that most people didn’t go see and which they could give a flying flaming hoot about.

Case in point: What picture won Best Picture last year?

Does anyone recall?

If you do, did you actually go see it?

Point made!

pilamaye on January 22, 2009 at 2:12 PM

and would Ledger have got a Nod, if not for dying and previously being the star in Brokeback Mountain?

jp on January 22, 2009 at 12:58 PM

In my opinion, Ledger was great and made the movie. Dead or not, he deserved the nomination.

orlandocajun on January 22, 2009 at 2:20 PM

Case in point: What picture won Best Picture last year?

Does anyone recall?

pilamaye on January 22, 2009 at 2:12 PM

Last year’s a bad example, because it was ‘No Country For Old Men,’ which is actually really good. Now, 2007? I have no idea.

Tanya on January 22, 2009 at 2:23 PM

Slumdog Millionaire is good.

Taken, with Liam Neeson was better than most action films including Dark Knight. Dark Knight was great but the only real standout was Heath Ledger. Morgan Freeman, Gyllenhaal, and Oldman all fell flat.

Iron Man was also OK. It’s going to take a while to sort out exactly how to judge comic book movies. It’s a different cinematic experience than others.

Gran Torino was good, and had many underrated acting performances. It really did come too late in the year. Screeners are a must nowadays when campaigning for Oscar nods. But the screeners also become a intellectual property liability once they get released because they are put out for illegal downloads.

Gran Torino would have earned its spot if released earlier, IMHO.

Benjamin Button was waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay overrated. I thought of Gump several times through the movie. What is it with these movies that portray white women growing up post war as being all sexually pent up?

How many white women here at HotAir ever gone on years-long sexual forays to quell their dispirited souls? I’m just asking?

***

The Race Card on January 22, 2009 at 2:24 PM

… Gran Torino was good, and had many underrated acting performances. …
The Race Card on January 22, 2009 at 2:24 PM

Replace the Hmong immigrants in Gran Torino with Latino, specifically Mexican immigrants and have some fun. Call it Death Wish Cinco.

The Race Card on January 22, 2009 at 2:30 PM

While Indiana Jones was interesting for two thirds, Iron Man and the Dark Knight.

It is the same story between Shakespeare and Marlowe.

The hoi polloi preferred Shakespeare and the aristocratic elites preferred Marlowe.

Needless to say, history selected the popular over the pompous.

Oxybeles on January 22, 2009 at 2:35 PM

Hollywood loves Brad & Angelina because…
they’ve done so much to make adultery acceptable.

jgapinoy on January 22, 2009 at 2:35 PM

While Indiana Jones was interesting for two thirds, Iron Man and the Dark Knight were fantastic, entertaining films.

It is the same story between Shakespeare and Marlowe.

The hoi polloi preferred Shakespeare and the aristocratic elites preferred Marlowe.

Needless to say, history selected the popular over the pompous.

Oxybeles on January 22, 2009 at 2:37 PM

Last year’s a bad example, because it was ‘No Country For Old Men,’ which is actually really good. Now, 2007? I have no idea.

Tanya on January 22, 2009 at 2:23 PM

Really? I dug the first half of No Country For Old Men, but the second half was horrendous. Everything the movie had been building up to either occured offscreen or was left unresolved.

I hate films that do that and claim it’s for “artistic purposes”. Bullcrap! I go to see a movie because it’s telling me a story. And a story has a beginning, a middle, and an ending. It’s even more unforgivable in a thriller like No Country.

Some may point to one of this year’s finest films, The Wrestler, and say that that movie’s final shot left the fate of its main character unresolved and open to interpretation which is certainly true. But that’s not what that movie was about. It had successfully told the story of Randy the Ram at that point and anything that occured beyond that was superfluous.

And BTW, the previous Best Picture winner was The Departed which was also overrated. Infernal Affairs is 10 times better.

Doughboy on January 22, 2009 at 2:49 PM

My movie about a gay journalist who brings down a Republican presidency is a shoe-in at the Oscars next year!

Bill Brasky on January 22, 2009 at 2:53 PM

Although Gran Torino was a really good movie I couldn’t imagine it getting a slew of Oscars because it’s the most politically incorrect movie, of many a year.

eaglewingz08 on January 22, 2009 at 3:03 PM

The only conclusion I can reach is that Oscar voters didn’t get it, and got too hung up on the rough edges of Eastwood’s Walt Kowalski.

Nah. Conservatives liked it.

Doom.

drjohn on January 22, 2009 at 3:03 PM

Bill, the main character has to be a transgendered gay African Pacific Islander gay handicapped female blogger raising Iraqi and Afghani war orphans while volunteering as a Code Pink organizer while bringing down the warmonger Republican President.

eaglewingz08 on January 22, 2009 at 3:06 PM

Maybe they found true love and a sense of family.

Many Americans, Republican and Democrat have found a better life through second marriage. Why do you reserve your scorn for them?

David Vitter, Gov Spitzer had a thing for whores. Yet they are not targets of your tireless, pious screeds.

The Race Card on January 22, 2009 at 3:09 PM

My movie about a gay journalist who brings down a Republican presidency is a shoe-in at the Oscars next year! – Bill

HA! First they’ll give you an Oscar, then they’ll beg you to run for the Senate!

Tony737 on January 22, 2009 at 3:29 PM

I’m fine with these nominations. It just means that there’s no compelling reason for me to watch the Oscar broadcast AGAIN this year, which I’m thinking means its ratings will be even lower than they were last year.

Between “Milk”, “Frost/Nixon” and Sean Penn, you just know there will be at least one spitting snarling anti-Bush acceptance speech which is reason #2 for not watching the broadcast.

NahnCee on January 22, 2009 at 4:01 PM

This goes to show you that if you make a movie were good over comes evil and lifts the human sprit.You WILL NOT WIN A OSCAR.

thmcbb on January 22, 2009 at 4:03 PM

Let’s face it, it was a weak year decade for actual, good movies.

Entertaining, perhaps… but not good.

Abby Adams on January 22, 2009 at 12:34 PM

Johan Klaus on January 22, 2009 at 4:27 PM

Of course Eastwood and Mickey Rourke were shut out. Hollywood HATES anyone that doesn’t sniff the asses of their leftist propaganda. Rourke is blackballed now for his comments in G.Q., the Wrestler has been pulled from nearly every theater in Commiefornia, why? because Rourke won a Golden Globe? or was it because Rourke doesn’t hate G.W. Bush?
Let’s face it, the Oscars have become Hollyweird’s, Nobel Peace Prize.

nelsonknows on January 22, 2009 at 5:06 PM

Another year.

Another round of “there’s no reason for me to care about the Oscars.”

The movies that us peasants like very rarely get recognized by these “elites.”

The Oscar has become just like the Nobel Peace Prize- wholly and completely about ideology, and not about substance.

Enjoy smelling your own farts, Oscar voters.

The rest of us will ignore you yet again, and ensure that the ratings continue to tank.

Hawkins1701 on January 22, 2009 at 5:18 PM

on the one-year anniversary of his death from an accidental overdose of prescription drugs.

When the prescription says “take 2 before bed” and you take 25 that’s not an accidental overdose.

Guardian on January 22, 2009 at 5:24 PM

nelson, as I pointed out up-thread, Eastwood has done quite well over the years with Oscar, and you do understand that Rourke was nominated this year for Best Actor for his performance in The Wrestler, right? You’re not just talking out of your ass are you?

dakine on January 22, 2009 at 5:50 PM

Jesus I can’t believe people are actually interested in this worthless crap. Now I know why O is in office…

ClassicCon on January 23, 2009 at 12:49 AM