<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: Chris Wallace wonders who&#8217;s President</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/21/video-chris-wallace-wonders-whos-president/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/21/video-chris-wallace-wonders-whos-president/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:06:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Video: Chris Wallace wonders whoâs President &#171; Top Daily Digest Reading</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/21/video-chris-wallace-wonders-whos-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1858424</link>
		<dc:creator>Video: Chris Wallace wonders whoâs President &#171; Top Daily Digest Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 05:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41312#comment-1858424</guid>
		<description>[...] Interesting? Proceed here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Interesting? Proceed here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sami</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/21/video-chris-wallace-wonders-whos-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1803841</link>
		<dc:creator>Sami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41312#comment-1803841</guid>
		<description>If a Bible is necessary for use in a court of law, when swearing in, why isn&#039;t it necessary to swear in the President?  

No Bible was used for the second, supposedly correct and official, swearing in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a Bible is necessary for use in a court of law, when swearing in, why isn&#8217;t it necessary to swear in the President?  </p>
<p>No Bible was used for the second, supposedly correct and official, swearing in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MSGTAS</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/21/video-chris-wallace-wonders-whos-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1803557</link>
		<dc:creator>MSGTAS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41312#comment-1803557</guid>
		<description>Words have meaning and it is the meaning that provides legal credibility.  

Personal experience proves this.  I was once placed under arrest and the &#039;Miranda Rights&#039; were not administered properly - the officer fumbled the words and left out one clause.  My lawyer, filed for a dismissal under the fact that I was not read my rights and the charges were dropped and I went free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Words have meaning and it is the meaning that provides legal credibility.  </p>
<p>Personal experience proves this.  I was once placed under arrest and the &#8216;Miranda Rights&#8217; were not administered properly &#8211; the officer fumbled the words and left out one clause.  My lawyer, filed for a dismissal under the fact that I was not read my rights and the charges were dropped and I went free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Conservative</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/21/video-chris-wallace-wonders-whos-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1803160</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41312#comment-1803160</guid>
		<description>Exactly RedSox.  Moot now that he has.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly RedSox.  Moot now that he has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedSoxNation</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/21/video-chris-wallace-wonders-whos-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1802798</link>
		<dc:creator>RedSoxNation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41312#comment-1802798</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It will go unnoticed, but Obama will take the oath again at some point and get it right&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Man, you were so right.  Great point.  Boy, you must be really smart or, as they say in Boston, &quot;wicked smaaat&quot;  Now, go home, its time to leave work and stop checking Hotair.com every 20 minutes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It will go unnoticed, but Obama will take the oath again at some point and get it right</p></blockquote>
<p>Man, you were so right.  Great point.  Boy, you must be really smart or, as they say in Boston, &#8220;wicked smaaat&#8221;  Now, go home, its time to leave work and stop checking Hotair.com every 20 minutes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agmartin</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/21/video-chris-wallace-wonders-whos-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1802719</link>
		<dc:creator>agmartin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41312#comment-1802719</guid>
		<description>just heard on CNN, Obama retoke the oath today</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just heard on CNN, Obama retoke the oath today</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kanda</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/21/video-chris-wallace-wonders-whos-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1802422</link>
		<dc:creator>kanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41312#comment-1802422</guid>
		<description>Wallace...wallace... the name rings a bell. Isn&#039;t he related to some famous guy named wallace? Is he related to Rusty Wallace?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wallace&#8230;wallace&#8230; the name rings a bell. Isn&#8217;t he related to some famous guy named wallace? Is he related to Rusty Wallace?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KCSteve</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/21/video-chris-wallace-wonders-whos-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1801976</link>
		<dc:creator>KCSteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41312#comment-1801976</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So the line of succession is
Biden
Nancy
Byrd
Hillary

Nice job America -yeesh!

jjshaka on January 21, 2009 at 11:35 AM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hillary will find it easy to make Byrd look like an unfortunate incident - heck he had to be carried out after Kennedy&#039;s seizure.  The other three will take a little doing but I&#039;m sure she&#039;s up to it.

The question really comes down to the order, doesn&#039;t it?

I&#039;d bet on Joe being first - if she&#039;s tapped to replace him that saves her two steps.

All I know is that if I&#039;m getting on a plane and I see Biden, Pelosi, and/or Byrd getting on them I&#039;m getting &lt;strong&gt;off!&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So the line of succession is<br />
Biden<br />
Nancy<br />
Byrd<br />
Hillary</p>
<p>Nice job America -yeesh!</p>
<p>jjshaka on January 21, 2009 at 11:35 AM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Hillary will find it easy to make Byrd look like an unfortunate incident &#8211; heck he had to be carried out after Kennedy&#8217;s seizure.  The other three will take a little doing but I&#8217;m sure she&#8217;s up to it.</p>
<p>The question really comes down to the order, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d bet on Joe being first &#8211; if she&#8217;s tapped to replace him that saves her two steps.</p>
<p>All I know is that if I&#8217;m getting on a plane and I see Biden, Pelosi, and/or Byrd getting on them I&#8217;m getting <strong>off!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcila</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/21/video-chris-wallace-wonders-whos-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1801742</link>
		<dc:creator>jcila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41312#comment-1801742</guid>
		<description>I dont know whats worse
Obama is a nice looking laywer who absolutly has never done anything except sue his own government on behalf of minorities

or Biden
the absolute friggin moron whos only claim to fame is 
he DIDNT blow the oath like obama did..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont know whats worse<br />
Obama is a nice looking laywer who absolutly has never done anything except sue his own government on behalf of minorities</p>
<p>or Biden<br />
the absolute friggin moron whos only claim to fame is<br />
he DIDNT blow the oath like obama did..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/21/video-chris-wallace-wonders-whos-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1801729</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41312#comment-1801729</guid>
		<description>Just as his qualifications are &#039;bobbled&#039;, so was the oath.
BO is consistent in his, at times clumsy, empty suit facade; I wonder if the zombies will ever catch on. The media might have something to do with the outcome, which seems a no-brainer.
The masses have finally found their Messiah and not even atheists are pointing out the religiosity of The Obama Nation.
Amazing? Not in The Age of Obama!
And, they&#039;re &#039;just getting started! Who-haaa!&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as his qualifications are &#8216;bobbled&#8217;, so was the oath.<br />
BO is consistent in his, at times clumsy, empty suit facade; I wonder if the zombies will ever catch on. The media might have something to do with the outcome, which seems a no-brainer.<br />
The masses have finally found their Messiah and not even atheists are pointing out the religiosity of The Obama Nation.<br />
Amazing? Not in The Age of Obama!<br />
And, they&#8217;re &#8216;just getting started! Who-haaa!&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Badger40</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/21/video-chris-wallace-wonders-whos-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1801449</link>
		<dc:creator>Badger40</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41312#comment-1801449</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;How he enunciates a sentence does not alter any magical properties (unlike the Army of Darkness reference ;)

Quibbling over this kind of minutia is what really doesn’t matter….and makes people look damned stupid.

LimeyGeek on January 21, 2009 at 12:06 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Army of Darkness reference doesn&#039;t involve enunciation, but the actual replacement of the proper word used, which is what we are talking about here.
I agree it&#039;s a trifling matter, but sometimes trifling matters give way to matters not so trifling.
It&#039;s another instance of how distractions muddy the waters.
Who knows what to pick on &amp; defend when there is so much &#039;noise&#039; out there?
Easy to get in under the radar, I&#039;m afraid, with this type of atmosphere.
It happens all the time with things like the interpretation of the Clean Air &amp; Water Acts, EPA mandates, etc.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>How he enunciates a sentence does not alter any magical properties (unlike the Army of Darkness reference ;)</p>
<p>Quibbling over this kind of minutia is what really doesn’t matter….and makes people look damned stupid.</p>
<p>LimeyGeek on January 21, 2009 at 12:06 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Army of Darkness reference doesn&#8217;t involve enunciation, but the actual replacement of the proper word used, which is what we are talking about here.<br />
I agree it&#8217;s a trifling matter, but sometimes trifling matters give way to matters not so trifling.<br />
It&#8217;s another instance of how distractions muddy the waters.<br />
Who knows what to pick on &amp; defend when there is so much &#8216;noise&#8217; out there?<br />
Easy to get in under the radar, I&#8217;m afraid, with this type of atmosphere.<br />
It happens all the time with things like the interpretation of the Clean Air &amp; Water Acts, EPA mandates, etc&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Joe</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/21/video-chris-wallace-wonders-whos-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1801412</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41312#comment-1801412</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/wehner/51542&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Talking about erratic and hypocritcial, the Erratic Andrew Sullivan!&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/wehner/51542" rel="nofollow">Talking about erratic and hypocritcial, the Erratic Andrew Sullivan!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike D.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/21/video-chris-wallace-wonders-whos-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1801309</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41312#comment-1801309</guid>
		<description>The minute Wallace brought this up I said to myself: &lt;em&gt;&quot;Self...here&#039;s your first nutroots conspiracy theory of the Age of Obama: Fox News leads effort to remove The Golden Child from Office coz reichwing &#039;justice&#039; Roberts carries water for PNAC.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The minute Wallace brought this up I said to myself: <em>&#8220;Self&#8230;here&#8217;s your first nutroots conspiracy theory of the Age of Obama: Fox News leads effort to remove The Golden Child from Office coz reichwing &#8216;justice&#8217; Roberts carries water for PNAC.&#8221;</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pain train</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/21/video-chris-wallace-wonders-whos-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1801230</link>
		<dc:creator>pain train</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41312#comment-1801230</guid>
		<description>I guess what baffles me is that &lt;strong&gt; President Obama&lt;/strong&gt; (there I said it, ech!) and &lt;em&gt;Chief Justice Roberts&lt;/em&gt; are supposedly two Constitutional Scholars.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.articleii.html#section1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.&quot;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;em&gt;“I Barack Hussein Obama”; &lt;/em&gt; &lt;strong&gt;“I Barack”&lt;/strong&gt;; &lt;em&gt;“do solemnly swear”;  &lt;/em&gt;“&lt;strong&gt;I Barack Hussein Obama do solemnly swear”; &lt;/strong&gt;“&lt;em&gt;That I will execute the office of President to the United States faithfully”&lt;/em&gt;; &lt;strong&gt;“That I will execute (pause, pause)”&lt;/strong&gt;; &lt;em&gt;“The off, faithfully, the Pres, the office of President of the United States”; &lt;/em&gt; &lt;strong&gt; “The office of President to the United States faithfully”; &lt;/strong&gt; &lt;em&gt;“And will to the best of my ability”&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;“And will to b…est of my ability”&lt;/strong&gt;; &lt;em&gt;“Preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States&quot;; &lt;/em&gt; &lt;strong&gt;“Preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States”; &lt;/strong&gt; &lt;em&gt;“So help you God”; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;“So help me God”; &lt;/strong&gt; &lt;em&gt;“Congratulations Mr. President” &lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess what baffles me is that <strong> President Obama</strong> (there I said it, ech!) and <em>Chief Justice Roberts</em> are supposedly two Constitutional Scholars.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.articleii.html#section1" rel="nofollow">&#8220;I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.&#8221;</a></p>
<p><em>“I Barack Hussein Obama”; </em> <strong>“I Barack”</strong>; <em>“do solemnly swear”;  </em>“<strong>I Barack Hussein Obama do solemnly swear”; </strong>“<em>That I will execute the office of President to the United States faithfully”</em>; <strong>“That I will execute (pause, pause)”</strong>; <em>“The off, faithfully, the Pres, the office of President of the United States”; </em> <strong> “The office of President to the United States faithfully”; </strong> <em>“And will to the best of my ability”</em>, <strong>“And will to b…est of my ability”</strong>; <em>“Preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States&#8221;; </em> <strong>“Preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States”; </strong> <em>“So help you God”; </em><strong>“So help me God”; </strong> <em>“Congratulations Mr. President” </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On the Right</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/21/video-chris-wallace-wonders-whos-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1801211</link>
		<dc:creator>On the Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41312#comment-1801211</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Beats The Alternatives...&lt;/strong&gt;

Video: Chris Wallace wonders who&#8217;s President
I&#8217;m going to give Fox News&#8217; Chris Wallace the benefit of the doubt here
and assume he wanted to fill a little time during the interminable Hope
and Change coverage yesterday. After......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Beats The Alternatives&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Video: Chris Wallace wonders who&#8217;s President<br />
I&#8217;m going to give Fox News&#8217; Chris Wallace the benefit of the doubt here<br />
and assume he wanted to fill a little time during the interminable Hope<br />
and Change coverage yesterday. After&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romeo13</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/21/video-chris-wallace-wonders-whos-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1801131</link>
		<dc:creator>Romeo13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41312#comment-1801131</guid>
		<description>It just struck me as to what really amuses me about this whole thing...

It IS a clear constitutional requirement that he say those words, in that order...

And in an OATH which states:  &quot;and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.&quot;

Manages to not follow the Constitution... in what is his very FIRST act as President...

Its like a bad movie... but sometimes reality is much more bizarre than anything Hollyweird can come up with...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It just struck me as to what really amuses me about this whole thing&#8230;</p>
<p>It IS a clear constitutional requirement that he say those words, in that order&#8230;</p>
<p>And in an OATH which states:  &#8220;and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.&#8221;</p>
<p>Manages to not follow the Constitution&#8230; in what is his very FIRST act as President&#8230;</p>
<p>Its like a bad movie&#8230; but sometimes reality is much more bizarre than anything Hollyweird can come up with&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: getalife</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/21/video-chris-wallace-wonders-whos-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1801118</link>
		<dc:creator>getalife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41312#comment-1801118</guid>
		<description>Roberts flubbed it. Nobody is perfect. Move on, it is silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roberts flubbed it. Nobody is perfect. Move on, it is silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoFanofLibs</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/21/video-chris-wallace-wonders-whos-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1801044</link>
		<dc:creator>NoFanofLibs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41312#comment-1801044</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Besides, I’m not comforted by the words &lt;em&gt;President Joe Biden&lt;/em&gt;.  And since the alternative to that is &lt;em&gt;President Nancy Pelosi&lt;/em&gt;, I’m more than satisfied with the oath taken yesterday, bobbles and all.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

*shudders*

President Biden? President Pelosi? 

Perish the thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Besides, I’m not comforted by the words <em>President Joe Biden</em>.  And since the alternative to that is <em>President Nancy Pelosi</em>, I’m more than satisfied with the oath taken yesterday, bobbles and all.</p></blockquote>
<p>*shudders*</p>
<p>President Biden? President Pelosi? </p>
<p>Perish the thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TexAz</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/21/video-chris-wallace-wonders-whos-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1801037</link>
		<dc:creator>TexAz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41312#comment-1801037</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Simple, retake the oath…. 30 second fix… been done before…
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
 
You mean he gets a do-over?  Rats. Roberts should have thought of that before he pulled this dirty trick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Simple, retake the oath…. 30 second fix… been done before…
</p></blockquote>
<p>You mean he gets a do-over?  Rats. Roberts should have thought of that before he pulled this dirty trick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave@Garfield Ridge</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/21/video-chris-wallace-wonders-whos-president/comment-page-2/#comment-1800998</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave@Garfield Ridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41312#comment-1800998</guid>
		<description>&quot;As every news organization pointed out at the time, Obama officially became President some time during Itzhak Perlman and Yo-Yo Ma’s Inaugural Dirge.&quot;

Ed, instead of taking the news organizations on faith (BTW, they disagreed-- Katie Couric said Biden was POTUS then), please consult a constitutional expert.

I was lucky to be surrounded by three nationally-known experts at the time, and all three vehemently protested Wolf Blitzer&#039;s proclamation that Obama became POTUS at noon, oath or not.  

That&#039;s simply not how it works, Ed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As every news organization pointed out at the time, Obama officially became President some time during Itzhak Perlman and Yo-Yo Ma’s Inaugural Dirge.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ed, instead of taking the news organizations on faith (BTW, they disagreed&#8211; Katie Couric said Biden was POTUS then), please consult a constitutional expert.</p>
<p>I was lucky to be surrounded by three nationally-known experts at the time, and all three vehemently protested Wolf Blitzer&#8217;s proclamation that Obama became POTUS at noon, oath or not.  </p>
<p>That&#8217;s simply not how it works, Ed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ludwig</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/21/video-chris-wallace-wonders-whos-president/comment-page-1/#comment-1800984</link>
		<dc:creator>Ludwig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41312#comment-1800984</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s because of crap like this that I haven&#039;t watched Fox News in the last 5 years.

Glenn Beck is the only reason I&#039;ll watch them now - because he&#039;s above this left vs. right business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s because of crap like this that I haven&#8217;t watched Fox News in the last 5 years.</p>
<p>Glenn Beck is the only reason I&#8217;ll watch them now &#8211; because he&#8217;s above this left vs. right business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big S</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/21/video-chris-wallace-wonders-whos-president/comment-page-1/#comment-1800981</link>
		<dc:creator>Big S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41312#comment-1800981</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Eh, we are already portrayed as clinging, warmongering, bucktoothed hicks who are barely able to tie our own shoes and who think gruel and road kill are high cuisine; might as well add “moronic” to the list.&lt;/strong&gt;

We could be sweet as pie to Obarfa and the left would still find a reason to hate us.

Bishop on January 21, 2009 at 11:26 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No need to add evidence for that claim on a daily basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong>Eh, we are already portrayed as clinging, warmongering, bucktoothed hicks who are barely able to tie our own shoes and who think gruel and road kill are high cuisine; might as well add “moronic” to the list.</strong></p>
<p>We could be sweet as pie to Obarfa and the left would still find a reason to hate us.</p>
<p>Bishop on January 21, 2009 at 11:26 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>No need to add evidence for that claim on a daily basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james hooker</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/21/video-chris-wallace-wonders-whos-president/comment-page-1/#comment-1800971</link>
		<dc:creator>james hooker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41312#comment-1800971</guid>
		<description>.....lest we wander down the wobbly road to ULTRA RIGHT WING TRUTHERISM, do, please sit down and STFU!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;..lest we wander down the wobbly road to ULTRA RIGHT WING TRUTHERISM, do, please sit down and STFU!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hening</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/21/video-chris-wallace-wonders-whos-president/comment-page-1/#comment-1800961</link>
		<dc:creator>Hening</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41312#comment-1800961</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t there a clause for affirmative action presidents?  Expecting them to Speak so that others can understand them, or getting something right is a section three, hateful.

Hopefully he was dancing while he took the oath.  That&#039;s what this country really wants to see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t there a clause for affirmative action presidents?  Expecting them to Speak so that others can understand them, or getting something right is a section three, hateful.</p>
<p>Hopefully he was dancing while he took the oath.  That&#8217;s what this country really wants to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manwithblackhat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/21/video-chris-wallace-wonders-whos-president/comment-page-1/#comment-1800957</link>
		<dc:creator>manwithblackhat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=41312#comment-1800957</guid>
		<description>Roberts bungled the wording, but Obama corrected him, thus saying it as prescribed in the Constitution. Worst case scenario, they could have repeated the proceedings privately, in an available room in the Capitol.

And if I&#039;m not mistaken (which sometimes happens), Obama became de facto president at noon, even though they were about fifteen minutes late with the oath. Or at least Bush&#039;s term ended at noon -- in which case, for about ten or fifteen minutes, Nancy Pelosi was acting president.

Be afraid....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roberts bungled the wording, but Obama corrected him, thus saying it as prescribed in the Constitution. Worst case scenario, they could have repeated the proceedings privately, in an available room in the Capitol.</p>
<p>And if I&#8217;m not mistaken (which sometimes happens), Obama became de facto president at noon, even though they were about fifteen minutes late with the oath. Or at least Bush&#8217;s term ended at noon &#8212; in which case, for about ten or fifteen minutes, Nancy Pelosi was acting president.</p>
<p>Be afraid&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
