Pepsi: We’re just opportunists!
posted at 3:40 pm on January 21, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Earlier this week, Pepsi joined in on the mass Obama worship in order to sell more of its pop. What would you say to the man who’s about to Refresh Our Nation? How about, “Have a Coke and a smile”? Naah, they probably wouldn’t pass that message along, any more than they would have generated this website for John McCain if he had won. After all, no one recalls Pepsi launching a “Morning in America” ad campaign to go along with Ronald Reagan’s inauguration.
However, Pepsi insists that they have no political agenda, and only hitched a ride with Obama to cash in on the hero worship while they can. A Hot Air reader forwards the reply he received from Pepsi after complaining about their pandering:
Dear Eddie,
In marketing our products, we always aim to convey a message of youthful spirit and optimism. As you can imagine, we try to make full use of events and venues from which we can reach the largest number of potential consumers with our message. For instance, Pepsi was widely visible at the New Year’s Eve celebrations in New York’s Times Square, and we currently are gearing up for our much-anticipated television advertising during the Super Bowl.
The inauguration of a president is another such event that engages a large number of people, both attending in Washington, D.C. as well as watching from living rooms around the world.
Our advertising initiatives coinciding with the inauguration reflect the hope shared by Americans of all political persuasions that our new president will succeed in meeting the serious challenges facing our country and our world. I can assure you that our marketing focus is set on reaching consumers to highlight our portfolio of beverages and snacks, and not the agenda of any political party.
Thanks for allowing us to share this information with you.
Uh-huh. So if their explanation holds water, Pepsi should be able to point to its previous ad campaigns tied to the inauguration of Republican presidents. So, let’s see them. I’m sure that Pepsi has all of those campaigns stored in their vaults.
No?
Of course not. Their explanation is, to be polite, rather weak. We don’t have elections to determine whether we celebrate New Years or hold a Super Bowl. The Pepsi ad campaign contributes to an already-unfortunate impulse in our media to create a cult of personality around a national leader unlike anything we have seen in American history. Putting politicians on a pedestal for worship has never — never — worked to the benefit of the nations that indulged themselves in that kind of secular worship.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
I won’t begrudge obama his party yesterday.
nor will I begrudge Pepsi’s desire to profit from it.
*shrugs*
lorien1973 on January 21, 2009 at 3:43 PM
Marketing campaigns are more sophisticated with a quicker turnaround these days, though.
lorien1973 on January 21, 2009 at 3:44 PM
The irony is that Barry is a coke man.
Leopold Stotch on January 21, 2009 at 3:45 PM
Pepsi switched its logo before the election, and it looks like a cheap knock-off of Obama’s. This is a case of CYA.
I’ll stick with tea and the occasional cup of Cheerwine, a local soda company.
Anna on January 21, 2009 at 3:47 PM
As a capitalist, I’d probably do the same thing.
ballz2wallz on January 21, 2009 at 3:47 PM
Ha! Awesome.
lorien1973 on January 21, 2009 at 3:48 PM
Very, very well played. I salute you, sir.
Darksean on January 21, 2009 at 3:48 PM
In their defense, the spectacle of this inauguration was supposed to be a monumental event, which was ripe for profit. I don’t know if Pepsi has an agenda or not, but it was a good business decision either way.
MadisonConservative on January 21, 2009 at 3:48 PM
Well, it’s not like I was asking for a Pepsi and Bourbon anyway…
And obviously their demographic research shows that Pepsi drinkers will respond positively to this ad campaign. That’s all it is, really.
Most businesses have gotten on the ‘green’ bandwagon, for example, not because they necessarily believe it’s good for the planet or anything, but because it increases sales.
Asher on January 21, 2009 at 3:48 PM
Awww. Just let em have their fun.
They’ll learn quick enough it’s not a good marketing strategy to piss off 50% of your market.
Maybe they should ask the Dixie Chicks to consult.
BacaDog on January 21, 2009 at 3:48 PM
Sucks, too, because Pepsi tastes much better than coke. Don’t make this difficult for me, Pepsi.
Pasalubong on January 21, 2009 at 3:49 PM
Really? Offend about half the country, who will remember it long after Obama supporters have forgotten all about it?
Karl on January 21, 2009 at 3:49 PM
They are going after the youth demographic and image and that just doesn’t square well with supporting inaugurations of Republican Presidents. They risk losing far more people by latching onto a Rep inauguration than they do a Dem one anyway.
Ideally, they should have stayed out of politics altogether.
In lieu of that, they should have at least phrased their ads in a way that didn’t make it sound like we were all beaten down and just waiting for Obama to lift us up, dust us off and make us whole again.
The campaign was stupid but I just don’t have it in me to boycott them….especially since Mountain Dew is my crack. Though, I will say that I was very happy to see that the Mountain Dew site was busy advertising some X Game tie ins and didn’t get political. I know it’s the same company, but, I’m happy to know that they didn’t tarnish my brand of choice.
JadeNYU on January 21, 2009 at 3:50 PM
Really?
I like Coke in the can. Pepsi is too sweet.
From a fountain, pepsi is better; coke is too weak and tasteless.
It’s weird.
lorien1973 on January 21, 2009 at 3:50 PM
TBH if I had thought of it sooner I’d sell Obama merchandise too. Fleecing suckers is what makes capitalism work so well.
Darth Executor on January 21, 2009 at 3:51 PM
They’re free to hitch their wagon to whomever…
And I’m free to drink whatever.
But I’d like to point out that it’s the leftists that detest this sort of crass commercialism most of all (see Kurt Cobain) and it WILL come back to haunt them as soon as Obama does the wrong thing.
OTOH, if I were Obama, I’d sue for infringement… or at the very least force Pepsi to pony up some of their profits (above and beyond taxes) to the US Treasury as licensing fees…
Skywise on January 21, 2009 at 3:52 PM
I dunno…I can buy Pepsi’s explanation. The entire point of advertising is to sell your product and make money. And given the current air of “Obama-mania” out there, this may be a genius campaign.
The reason they didn’t hook onto a Republican inaugural is that they, along with recent previous Democrats, never had near the same widespread appeal.
JetBoy on January 21, 2009 at 3:52 PM
Absolutely. I wish I had cashed in on the mania too.
Nothing eases the pain like a little jingle.
BacaDog on January 21, 2009 at 3:53 PM
Pepsi and their products were my favorites. They have since gone on my boycott list. I don’t need any reminders about Obama and I certainly don’t have any tingles running up my leg.
nwsseeker on January 21, 2009 at 3:54 PM
Hah! I got the same letter Eddie got; but, I’ve had a volley of emails with Pepsi. Apparently I’ve touched a nerve with their consumer relations rep, Marge. Here’s some of the latest:
So, I wrote back to Marge:
IrishEi on January 21, 2009 at 3:54 PM
So am I!
As Belushi once said: “Coke! No Petsi!”
drjohn on January 21, 2009 at 3:54 PM
Excuse me, but could you folks explain to me what this “Pepsi” product is? I’ve never heard of it.
Sincerely,
radjah shelduck
Atlanta, Georgia
radjah shelduck on January 21, 2009 at 3:55 PM
I used to think six of one, half dozen of the other, but I went fully into the Pepsi camp years ago.
Of course, I do believe it’s all the same at fast-food fountains, but yes: give me a nice, ice-cold can of Pepsi over a can of coke anyday.
It kills me, too, because their CEO is a lib nut:
http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/may2005/nf20050520_7587_db042.htm
Pasalubong on January 21, 2009 at 3:57 PM
heh…
I imagine Pepsi isn’t loved in Atlanta.
JetBoy on January 21, 2009 at 3:57 PM
got the same letter.
ctmom on January 21, 2009 at 3:58 PM
If I could cash in on Obama, I would too. They’re a private company, so whatever.
jimmy the notable on January 21, 2009 at 3:59 PM
Wasted effort.
Obama’s supporters have chosen the Kool-Aid.
saint kansas on January 21, 2009 at 4:01 PM
Considering who’s at the helm at Pepsi, is any of this nonsense really surprising?
http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=30398
rvastar on January 21, 2009 at 4:01 PM
As a conservative, I’m not offended. I’d wager that most regular conservatives aren’t either.
Therefore, it’s likely your assertion that ‘half the country’ is offended is probably a false one.
I don’t like Pepsi either, I prefer Coca Cola.
ballz2wallz on January 21, 2009 at 4:01 PM
I’ve been a Pepsi drinker almost from birth (it was put in my bottle as a baby) and I sent them a complaint as well. I didn’t even really read the response because I knew it would be a bunch of b.s. anyway and it appears that I was correct.
It looks like a lot of people are pissed off by Pepsi around here in Ohio. I say this because I went to Wal-Mart to get pop and wanted to get Vanilla Coke (instead of Pepsi because it’s the only Coke in a can that I can really drink) and they were completely out of Coke, Cherry Coke, and Vanilla Coke in the 12 packs. My wife wanted Mt Dew Code Red anyway so I just bought some Mt Dew Voltage. It’s still a Pepsi product, but oh well.
MobileVideoEngineer on January 21, 2009 at 4:02 PM
Well I’m a Coca-cola man (as opposed to being a coke man) so I don’t care. I consider Pepsi simply to be opportunistic capitalists. Which are an endangered species about now.
rbj on January 21, 2009 at 4:02 PM
Ok, let’s settle this.
We need a poll, Ed. Quit drinking Pepsi because of their ad or not.
BacaDog on January 21, 2009 at 4:03 PM
Who cares if a corporation has an agenda? So long as their primary agenda is making money it doesn’t matter that much. It’s why I think boycotting Google is kinda dumb and certainly fruitless.
TheUnrepentantGeek on January 21, 2009 at 4:04 PM
Or MSNBC
Or Letterman
Or Tom Hanks
Or Katie Couric
Or the NYT, LAT, MPLS Star & Tribune
Christian Conservative on January 21, 2009 at 4:06 PM
THAT’S ME. THAT’S ME! I sent that in.
WooHoo!
Oh, yeah. Pepsi sucks!
madmonkphotog on January 21, 2009 at 4:07 PM
I actually almost buy Pepsi’s response here. While they may not have done this for previous presidents, there wasn’t a cult following, made up of millions of gullible idiots, of this magnitude either.
I still don’t respect them for it, but the following of Obama is much more young (and stupid) than of any other previous president. You’ve got tens of millions of morons worshipping an evil socialist, why not attach your product to him and get some Obamamania sales.
That said, I’m glad I stopped drinking caffeinated soda a year or so ago, and Pepsi had been my product of choice. If I was still drinking it, I’d be forced to switch to Coke (which I hate).
RightWinged on January 21, 2009 at 4:07 PM
What’s the point of ending the consumption of a particular product or service as a result of their endorsement of a particular candidate? If that was the case, you’d probably be living in the woods right now. Even the oil companies gave heavily to the Obama campaign.
Don’t forget, he IS our president, and their support of our president isn’t outrageous by any means.
ballz2wallz on January 21, 2009 at 4:08 PM
Rejoice. There is always…time.
Andy in Agoura Hills on January 21, 2009 at 4:08 PM
\pepsi
Wade on January 21, 2009 at 4:08 PM
I’m a Joo, so I drink JUICE, and chew JUICY FRUIT.
That and a Dr. Brown’s Cream Soday
J.J. Sefton on January 21, 2009 at 4:08 PM
I’m drinking my current stash, and not buying any more this year. It was a stupid move on their part.
BoomJunkie on January 21, 2009 at 4:10 PM
C’mon. They found a marketing opportunity, they seized on it. That’s capitalism.
justfinethanks on January 21, 2009 at 4:10 PM
OT: How come all the awesome flavors of Coke and Pepsi are only available in diet form these days? I can’t drink the diet crap, because it makes my stomach throw a fit. All the lemon, lime, vanilla, strawberry, etc are only ever at the stores in diet flavors. Cherry is the only flavor I can ever find in regular.
That outrages me more than this.
MadisonConservative on January 21, 2009 at 4:10 PM
Doesn’t make sense. If you need to change your logo and marketing style to adapt to the new age, then why didn’t Chevy or Ford change their logos. Hell, they could have just changed their jingles.
Instead of “Like A Rock” by Bob Segar, Chevy could have changed it to, “Like Barack”.
Ford could now be built, “Barack Tough”.
Heck, get rid of the term “hemi” in Dodge vehicles, and call it a “Barack”.
CFL on January 21, 2009 at 4:11 PM
Sure, but even four years ago, Bush attracted more voters.
Esthier on January 21, 2009 at 4:11 PM
Starbucks did the same. I got a mass email yesterday inviting me to volunteer as a good citizen should and I would get a free coffee.
I wrote back and protested, and the email said my complaints would be forwarded to the proper person.
Note to business: almost half the country did not vote for the dude, and young voters didn’t show up in any greater numbers than before.
PattyJ on January 21, 2009 at 4:11 PM
Hey Pepsi, didn’t Democrats Bill & Hillary Clinton oversee the new years ball drop in Times Square?
What Pepsi celebrations took place at Republican events?
RJL on January 21, 2009 at 4:12 PM
My issue is more with the fact that they changed their logo at the time they did. If they changed the logo a couple of years ago or even a year and a half ago, it may not have been that big of a deal because Pepsi does change it’s logo quite a bit, but it’s all in the timing and how they changed their logo.
MobileVideoEngineer on January 21, 2009 at 4:13 PM
You mean like this? Miller sponsors public sex fetish fair in San Fransisco C’mon
Wade on January 21, 2009 at 4:14 PM
I don’t think previous inaugurations were so ripe for marketing… I’ve never seen so many mindless followers who would so willingly spend money on anything with Obama on it. Which inaugurations in the past do you think they should reasonably have marketed towards for their explanation to hold up?
DaveS on January 21, 2009 at 4:15 PM
Baja Blast Mountain Dew
Esthier on January 21, 2009 at 4:15 PM
RJL on January 21, 2009 at 4:12 PM
DaveS on January 21, 2009 at 4:17 PM
Skandia Recluse on January 21, 2009 at 4:17 PM
Didn’t Reagan win 47 states or something in 1984 with soemthing like 60% of the vote?
Kelligan on January 21, 2009 at 4:18 PM
YES. DEAR LORD, YES.
If they put that liquid sex in cans or bottles, my pantry will have no room for anything else.
MadisonConservative on January 21, 2009 at 4:23 PM
Ugh. I love you guys, but your taste in carbonated beverages leaves something to be desired.
My husband drinks that crap too.
Anna on January 21, 2009 at 4:26 PM
btw, Wasn’t it not too long ago everyone was going to boycott Coca-Cola for replacing Santa Claus (too Christmasy) with those polar bears on it’s Holiday cans?
JetBoy on January 21, 2009 at 4:26 PM
I guess I’m just delighted that as I read this piece, I have a fresh, icy cold bottle of Diet Coke on my desk…
D2Boston on January 21, 2009 at 4:26 PM
Yeah, but Reagan didn’t have that “aura of celebrity” surround him. And no cool logo.
JetBoy on January 21, 2009 at 4:27 PM
As far as I am concerned, this is the only thing you really get out of guzzling Pepsi!
pilamaye on January 21, 2009 at 4:28 PM
Oh, I’m sure they’re just as liberal as the next company, but it should be obvious that it was also a business decision.
Is this big corporation still evil for supporting the Obamanation, however?
Grafted on January 21, 2009 at 4:29 PM
I really hate it that it’s only sold at Taco Bell.
Esthier on January 21, 2009 at 4:33 PM
WIN
Jim Treacher on January 21, 2009 at 4:37 PM
Just keep anything related to Obama off Sam Adams products.
Something brown, sickening sweet and not suited for the very young to take in deserves his logo.
Hening on January 21, 2009 at 4:38 PM
Another reason to buy Coke.
Not that I’d buy pepsi anyway, but it’s always good to have a reason.
:)
Bob's Kid on January 21, 2009 at 4:42 PM
Starbucks did the same. I got a mass email yesterday inviting me to volunteer as a good citizen should and I would get a free coffee.
I wrote back and protested, and the email said my complaints would be forwarded to the proper person.
Note to business: almost half the country did not vote for the dude, and young voters didn’t show up in any greater numbers than before.
CFL on January 21, 2009 at 4:43 PM
Doesn’t make sense. If you need to change your logo and marketing style to adapt to the new age, then why didn’t Chevy or Ford change their logos. Hell, they could have just changed their jingles.
Instead of “Like A Rock” by Bob Segar, Chevy could have changed it to, “Like Barack”.
Ford could now be built, “Barack Tough”.
Heck, get rid of the term “hemi” in Dodge vehicles, and call it a “Barack”.
CFL on January 21, 2009 at 4:44 PM
Barack “Hemi” Obama…
Although if they got Obama to actually do the ad it might not be bad…
“Dodge trucks are solid or my name isn’t Barack H. Obama”
“What’s the H stand for, Mr. Obama?”
Slams fist down on the hood of truck
“Hemi!”
Skywise on January 21, 2009 at 4:49 PM
It’s still a free market (for now) so Pepsi can do whatever they want with their advertising. But I’ll be damned if I buy any kind of product with the Seal of Obama on it.
patriette on January 21, 2009 at 4:50 PM
If Pepsi wants to hook their wagon to the libtards, fine. I am for Diet Coke or Coke Zero, and I won’t drink Pepsi. At a restaurant, I ask if they carry Coke or Pepsi. The answer is Pepsi, I order ice tea.
So, if President Obama and I go golfing and drink Diet Cokes, we will be able to get along . . . as long as we don’t have to talk politics.
Mallard T. Drake on January 21, 2009 at 4:52 PM
I’ve been showing a strong preference for Coke these past few days, and I’m not sure why.
And I’ve decided that Yale has come to love Harvard educated Barack Obama way too much. Barack-ak-ak-ak, Co-ax, Co-ax!
unclesmrgol on January 21, 2009 at 4:52 PM
I quit my 20-year addiction to Diet Pepsi cold turkey. Somehow being reminded of the Obamanation every time I took a sip ruined the taste. Am drinking Coke Zero as I type.
BitterClinger on January 21, 2009 at 4:52 PM
The last can of Pepsi at our house hit the trash can yesterday. We are now a Coke only household (with an occasional 7-up). I HOPE it was worth it, but we’ve made a CHANGE.
flyoverland on January 21, 2009 at 4:54 PM
My wife just got an Obama slobathon email from the outfit that runs her yoga class. Even in Maryland, almost 40% of people voted against the Messiah. You’d think they’d be more careful not to alienate people in this economy.
Attila (Pillage Idiot) on January 21, 2009 at 4:54 PM
I think this is a bit of a stretch.
The Pepsi company is pretty much a giant leech, sucking off the trends and empty-headedness of each and every youthful generation, that is easily swayed by social phenomenons. SO, I don’t see really, anything “political” about this. They have hit all the movers/shakers of each generation, standing on Brittany Spears shoulders when she was the phenomenon about 8 years ago, and so on and so forth. Obama, as testament to his celebrity status, is just another one of those “types” they go after. It makes you sick thinking about it, but there will be millions grabbing pepsi bottles because of its graphics/slogans, hyping Obama and once again sucking at the “teet” of flash in the pans/cultural celebrities.
cabbageheat on January 21, 2009 at 4:59 PM
It’s no skin off my nose what Pepsi does. I don’t drink Pepsi, mostly because of the being to Israel and knowing why it’s not sold in Israel thing……
It’s a free country. If Pepsi can make cash off the suckaaaas in this country who buy their products because of Obamania, have at it.
mjk on January 21, 2009 at 4:59 PM
Pepsi is dead to me.
Wrote them a letter stating as such.
gdonovan on January 21, 2009 at 5:04 PM
I got that yesterday too. I’m sure it was just coincidence that they chose yesterday of all days to send it and they used the word “pledge” when asking us to volunteer our time.
On top of that, when I got my morning coffee today, I slid the cup into a recyclable sleeve colored red and blue and sporting a large quote from Lincoln’s inaugural address of 1865.
Laying it on a little thick, eh Starbucks? I’m mulling a switch to DD now.
World B. Free on January 21, 2009 at 5:04 PM
Age of Obama Cola Advertising:
I’d Like the Government to Buy Me a Coke and Keep Me Company…
Tzetzes on January 21, 2009 at 5:12 PM
For an American president, probably. But it’s about what one might have seen in certain quarters 90 years ago when the object was Mussolini. The parallel is not coincidental.
JDPerren on January 21, 2009 at 5:19 PM
Putting politicians on a pedestal for worship has never — never — worked to the benefit of the nations that indulged themselves in that kind of secular worship.
I recall…. Hitler! Boy did the German people love him!
Badger40 on January 21, 2009 at 5:20 PM
In more ways than just a beverage.
Badger40 on January 21, 2009 at 5:22 PM
You just reminded me to write a protest e-mail to Pepsico. While doing so, I noticed that Tropicana, which was on my grocery store list for tonight, is one of their products. I let them know I won’t be buying that, either, from now on.
Alana on January 21, 2009 at 5:23 PM
First I was like
:/
Then I lol’d
:D
- The Cat
MirCat on January 21, 2009 at 5:24 PM
OOOooooo….bad news for you, ANNA.CHEERWINE IS A PEPSI PRODUCT. Regional, YES, but NOT “LOCAL”—once upon a LONG time ago, yes but it is currently VERY, VERY PEPSI OWNED.My dad’s buddy owns the local bottling distribution center….and he is livid about their logo change—but he is a LOCAL business who will suffer for this.Kinda like the CITGO joberships.
I am a southerner whose husband is DEARLY ADDICTED to CHEERWINE. We can’t get it in The People’s Republlic of Northern Hell where we live, so when I am home in Sleepy Southern Hometown, I haul it back by the CASELOT.I even had my dad’s bud SHIP IT TO HIS UNIT IN IRAQ….THAT was pretty cool….but I don’t even touch soda (it eats your bones and teeth)….so I could care less.
seejanemom on January 21, 2009 at 5:29 PM
Coke is better anyway.
Jay on January 21, 2009 at 5:30 PM
But again, everyone was boycotting Coke after they replaced Santa with those polar bear on their holiday cans. Santa was apparently “too Christmas” for them.
How soon we forget. This Pepsi thing will blow over in a couple weeks too.
JetBoy on January 21, 2009 at 5:32 PM
Eh, I still consider it local, as it’s a regional distribution. Is it owned by Pepsi, or just distributed by them? It is pretty awesome, though.
Anna on January 21, 2009 at 5:34 PM
Five years and counting since I drank a Pepsi last….
Thanks, Pepsi boycotting Israel!!! Now I boycott you!!!
mjk on January 21, 2009 at 5:37 PM
OWNED. Pepsi bought it and it is BOTTLED by them now.
Sorry.
My hub will still drink it the same way I will still listen to The Dixie Chicks>>>>but I would never own stock, nor attend a concert (as it were).
seejanemom on January 21, 2009 at 5:39 PM
I got the same reply after sending my feedback quoting someone from Hot Air.
My message back”
Uh, I ain’t buying your reasons or your Pepsi, nevermore.
I drank 2 cases weekly.
Nevermore.
klickink.wordpress.com on January 21, 2009 at 5:47 PM
For all you who believe in the free market of Pepsi, you’re nuts. They made this campaign based on a political move.
And if you think the left believes in free market, think again.
They’ll attack true free marketers on a whim.
madmonkphotog on January 21, 2009 at 5:49 PM
Yes it is. And maybe they’ll increase their market share due to it.
However, if they’re going to associate their product with a political campaign, they should also be aware that people who do not support that politician may dislike their approach. And, as a consumer, I’m perfectly justified in letting the company know if, and why, I won’t purchase their product.
malclave on January 21, 2009 at 6:08 PM
Wow, that sucks about Cheerwine. Guess I’ll switch to Dr. Pepper with grenadine.
Anna on January 21, 2009 at 6:11 PM
Pepsi supported the Arab boycott back in the 70′s. I haven’t bought any pepsi products since then (at least no products that I knew were owned by Pepsi) and don’t plan to ever give them a dime in the future. I hope the company goes down the tubes, in the most painful way possible.
progressoverpeace on January 21, 2009 at 6:13 PM
There are ways to capitalize on current events without risking offence to the 58,000,000+ who voted for the other guy. Remember this Snickers ad from the Bush/Gore 2000 election?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEYo6aQCWtU
Least of These on January 21, 2009 at 6:19 PM
PepsiChange you can damned well believe in! Not coming back in my house, ever.But folks, while we are taking out a little electoral/anti-messiah frustration on Pepsi, we need to share our wrath with all they brands. You can see what brands not to buy here.
They include that Mt. Dew someone above was switching to. They also include a lot more. Shopping is about to get a lot more fun. Pepsi/Obama profits comes from these amoung others:
And Frito-Lay,
Quaker Cereal,
Tropicana
Gater Aid
Lipton
Aquafina
Cracker Jacks
Doritos
Can anyone else help the list grow?
MikeA on January 21, 2009 at 6:23 PM
PepsiChange you can damned well believe in! Not coming back in my house, ever.But folks, while we are taking out a little electoral/anti-messiah frustration on Pepsi, we need to share our wrath with all they brands. You can see what brands not to buy here.
They include that Mt. Dew someone above was switching to. They also include a lot more. Shopping is about to get a lot more fun. Pepsi/Obama profits comes from these amoung others:
And Frito-Lay,
Quaker Cereal,
Tropicana
Gater Aid
Lipton
Aquafina
Cracker Jacks
Doritos
Can anyone else help the list grow? Generic is looking better all the time.
MikeA on January 21, 2009 at 6:23 PM
COKE.COKE, COKE.COKE.COKE,COKE and sometimes Dr.Pepper
thmcbb on January 21, 2009 at 6:47 PM
Yeah, why don’t we just boycott every company run by Democrats.
Seriously, I hate boycotts. They almost always turn out incredibly hypocritical.
Ortzinator on January 21, 2009 at 6:47 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »