Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


CBO: Stimulus package too much, too late

posted at 8:25 pm on January 21, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

While the Obama administration and Democrats in Congress keep upping the ante on the new stimulus package, the Congressional Budget Office thinks the entire exercise is pointless.  Their new report states that at least half of the money will come too late to have any effect on the recession.  Most of the money gets spent far too late to boost the economy in the short term:

Less than half the money dedicated to highways, school construction and other infrastructure projects in a massive economic stimulus package unveiled by House Democrats is likely to be spent within the next two years, according to congressional budget analysts, meaning most of the spending would come too late to lift the nation out of recession.

A report by the Congressional Budget Office found that only about $136 billion of the $355 billion that House leaders want to allocate to infrastructure and other so-called discretionary programs would be spent by Oct. 1, 2010. The rest would come in future years, long after the CBO and other economists predict the recession will have ended. …

But the CBO analysis appears to confirm the complaints of many Republicans and other critics, who have long argued that spending money on highway construction and other infrastructure projects is ineffective at quickly jolting a sluggish economy. The report was distributed to reporters yesterday by aides to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.)

Barack Obama has named his priorities for rebuilding America as infrastructure and alternative energy.  The stimulus supposedly will rebuild the economy by focusing the government spigot towards these two areas.  If so, that spigot seems a little narrow.  The CBO notes that only $4 billion of the $30 billion for highways gets spent in the first two years.  On energy, less than $3 billion of the $18.5 billion will be used before 2011.  Only half of the $14 billion budget for school construction and renovations will get spent before then, too.

In other words, the stimulus package appears to be nothing more than a big pork product designed to benefit Congress and Obama much more than the economy.  While economists believe that the recession will be long and harsh, few have predicted that it will last for more than two years.  And if we need to pass a stimulus bill with such urgency, why does it allocate most of the spending in years 3 and 4 of the Obama administration?  The idea of government stimulus packages is to create jobs now, not three and four years from now.

We’d be better off leaving the money in the private sector in the form of massive tax cuts, matched with cuts in government spending.  Private capital creates jobs much faster than anything proposed in this package.

Interestingly, the Post ran this on the front page of their business section, page D-1, rather than on the front page of the newspaper.  The media keeps telling us that the economic crisis is the most important story at the moment.  If so, pushing this highly critical look at the Obama administration’s economic centerpiece to section D makes little sense … or perhaps it does.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

We’d be better off leaving the money in the private sector in the form of massive tax cuts, matched with cuts in government spending. Private capital creates jobs much faster than anything proposed in this package.

Yeah. Good luck getting that into the skull of a Marxist ideologue. You know what they say……You can wish in one hand and crap in the other and see which one gets filled first.

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on January 21, 2009 at 8:34 PM

So guess what they will spend the money on:

Other portions of the proposal — including $275 billion in tax cuts and nearly $200 billion for jobless benefits, health care for the poor and other entitlement programs — are expected to pour cash into the nation’s faltering economy much more quickly.

“walking around” money

pedestrian on January 21, 2009 at 8:35 PM

Dang! Who saw that coming?

JeffinOrlando on January 21, 2009 at 8:35 PM

May be a good time to move some investments off shore. Japan, perhaps. At least there, the system is somewhat stable and the expenses are up front. There’s no telling what changes we’re going to have to go through here. If they will overlook common sense and warnings like this from professionals who, by the way, we pay to do the job of this kind of financial analysis, then I think we’re in for a world of financial pain. Either these guys are making this up as they go or their biggest task is figuring out how to screw us without us catching on.

genso on January 21, 2009 at 8:36 PM

Jeez, what a freaking shock.

I like how tax cuts from Bush are bad.

But keeping Bush tax cuts + another $275 billion in tax cuts from Obama are good.

Chuck Schick on January 21, 2009 at 8:39 PM

the Congressional Budget Office thinks the entire exercise is pointless.

When in a hole, first stop digging.

Murphy9 on January 21, 2009 at 8:41 PM

Since the economy is cyclical, my fear is that it’ll be on the upswing DESPITE the democrats come 2010 and 2012, but Bambi will get full credit for it. The media will make sure he does.

SouthernGent on January 21, 2009 at 8:41 PM

I like how tax cuts from Bush are bad.

But keeping Bush tax cuts + another $275 billion in tax cuts from Obama are good.

And BHO repeated trashed & ridiculed Bush’s “tax-cuts-for-the-rich”.

jgapinoy on January 21, 2009 at 8:42 PM

Scam.

javamartini on January 21, 2009 at 8:43 PM

spent within the next two years…meaning most of the spending would come too late to lift the nation out of recession.

But extremist liberal policies will prolong the recession, just like FDR prolonged the Depression for what, six years?

jgapinoy on January 21, 2009 at 8:44 PM

And if we need to pass a stimulus bill with such urgency, why does it allocate most of the spending in years 3 and 4 of the Obama administration?

Hmmm……let’s see, why 3-4 years from now? Why that’s right before the next presidential election isn’t it?

What a coincidence!!!

AZ_Mike on January 21, 2009 at 8:44 PM

“We’d be better off leaving the money in the private sector in the form of massive tax cuts, matched with cuts in government spending. Private capital creates jobs much faster than anything proposed in this package.”

Gee, I have been saying that for 2 years!! Won’t anyone listen??
Doing anything like Obama want’s will give us a shortcut to depression.

izoneguy on January 21, 2009 at 8:46 PM

…..allocation of money occurs three or four years from now……. Just in time for reelection! What a coincidence.

DJ from MA on January 21, 2009 at 8:47 PM

Doing anything like Obama want’s will give us a shortcut to depression.

izoneguy on January 21, 2009 at 8:46 PM

Destroy the economy now for the “hope” of failure in the future. Sweet.

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on January 21, 2009 at 8:47 PM

It was never about “stimulating” the economy. It’s quite easy to take a look back in history and see what’s actually gotten us out of recessions…and the plans they have in mind never had done that.

But you can’t expand the federal government by cutting taxes, now can you? Damn the average citizen…full speed ahead!

Asher on January 21, 2009 at 8:49 PM

So,Obama wants to keep fueling the Titanic’s
engine’s with cash,knowing that its still on
a collision with the economy iceberg,

and when,it starts to sink,the first lifeboats
away will have pork cash stuffed to the oar
fixtures,

OUTSTANDING!!!

canopfor on January 21, 2009 at 8:50 PM

Their new report states that at least half of the money will come too late to have any effect on the recession.

If the printing presses aren’t fast enough they’ll just have to start printing larger denominations. We’re going to need them soon anyway once the inflation really starts to kick in.

FloatingRock on January 21, 2009 at 8:53 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a2pYIw6jA-I&feature=related

If it keeps on rainin, levees goin to break,
If it keeps on rainin, levees goin to break,
When the levee breaks Ill have no place to stay.
Mean old levee taught me to weep and moan,
Lord, mean old levee taught me to weep and moan,
Got what it takes to make a mountain man leave his home,
Oh, well, oh, well, oh, well.
Dont it make you feel bad
When youre tryin to find your way home,
You dont know which way to go?
If youre goin down south
They go no work to do,
If you dont know about chicago.

Cryin wont help you, prayin wont do you no good,
Now, cryin wont help you, prayin wont do you no good,
When the levee breaks, mama, you got to move.
All last night sat on the levee and moaned,
All last night sat on the levee and moaned,
Thinkin bout me baby and my happy home.
Going, gon to chicago,
Gon to chicago,
Sorry but I cant take you.

Going down, going down now, going down.

Dr Evil on January 21, 2009 at 8:54 PM

Obambi should get college kids to “Plant a Tree For Every American” as a quick way to capitalize on his supporters’ devotion and to channel their hysterical Barrylicious energies into something superficial, showy and harmless ~~~and then really start stimulating the actual economy by funding the 100 Best Research Projects in need of seed money (Penn State scientists have a bacteria that excretes pure hydrogen, which would solve part of the “alternate energy” future, etc., etc.), and these newly blossoming technologies and inventions could begin to open up fresh industrial avenues for massive employment.

C’mon Barack, do something with some actual intelligence.

Pandering time is over.

profitsbeard on January 21, 2009 at 8:55 PM

Hmmm……let’s see, why 3-4 years from now? Why that’s right before the next presidential election isn’t it?

What a coincidence!!!

AZ_Mike on January 21, 2009 at 8:44 PM

Egg-zackly!

IrishEi on January 21, 2009 at 8:55 PM

There is another kicker in the “infrastructure” program. Once all those roads and schools get built someone has to maintain them. And that burden is going to fall on the local and state taxpayer.

johnsteele on January 21, 2009 at 8:57 PM

You can wish in one hand and crap in the other and see which one gets filled first.

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on January 21, 2009 at 8:34 PM

Comrade, where did you receive your indoctrination training? A good communist does not wish. A good communist does not desire more than they need.

And what are you doing with a handful of crap? That is needed for the fertilizer.

Please report to 1600 Penn. Ave, Washington DC for proper reeducation.

Immediately!

klickink.wordpress.com on January 21, 2009 at 8:57 PM

When I was in graduate school Arthur Okun, who had been Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors under Kennedy and Johnson, came for a lecture and discussed why fiscal policy is the most inefficient way of stimulating the economy. He told us that they were still spending “stimulus” money in the 1970s from programs passed in the early 60’s. Okun was as Keynsian as you can get yet from experience he believed that changes in tax rates were the proper lever for government stimulation. The CBO has just confirmed what Okun knew thirty years ago.

jerryofva on January 21, 2009 at 8:58 PM

While the Obama administration and Democrats in Congress keep upping the ante on the new stimulus package, the Congressional Budget Office thinks the entire exercise is pointless.

Which means it will be done with fervor and be claimed as a success. Let’s hear it for Central Planning!

Weight of Glory on January 21, 2009 at 9:00 PM

Since the economy is cyclical, my fear is that it’ll be on the upswing DESPITE the democrats come 2010 and 2012, but Bambi will get full credit for it. The media will make sure he does.

SouthernGent on January 21, 2009 at 8:41 PM

Everything good will accrue to Barry. Everything bad will be the fault of George Bush, for the next friggin 20 years.

JonRoss on January 21, 2009 at 9:01 PM

If the printing presses aren’t fast enough they’ll just have to start printing larger denominations. We’re going to need them soon anyway once the inflation really starts to kick in.

FloatingRock on January 21, 2009 at 8:53 PM

So who would you want to be on the bazillion dollar bill?

Weight of Glory on January 21, 2009 at 9:02 PM

Please report to 1600 Penn. Ave, Washington DC for proper reeducation.

Immediately!

klickink.wordpress.com on January 21, 2009 at 8:57 PM

Tru dat, playa.

I’m getting into my hybrid Yugo that I constructed from an old washing machine and solar calculators. I’ll see you in 4-6 months. Make sure that my daily ration of gruel is lukewarm, please keep a big glass of organic water handy so I can take my recommended dose of Hopium.

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on January 21, 2009 at 9:08 PM

Does this mean Bush will be responsible for a recovery if it happens in the next year? It will be spending he approved over the last couple of years.

Mark1971 on January 21, 2009 at 9:08 PM

Folks folks folks. The American economy is not that bad. Isn’t anyone paying attention?!? The media is in the tank for Obama.

That means CHECK THE NUMBERS:

More than 2 million jobs lost last year -the most since 1945. Uh, what was happening in 1945? Oh, yeah, WW II. All those military-industrial-complex jobs being turnkeyed. And that’s just NUMBERS. The Obamedia gives no PERCENTAGE comparison. There were fewer jobs due to the smaller population.

It’s not the loss of jobs (although that does hurt the effected people) that’s killing us. It’s trying to limit the impact of a recession brought on by speculation created and fueled by greedy politicians of both parties (although pretty much created by the DemComs plan to destroy America).

All the money lost so far is paper – speculation on house prices on the part of both banks and greedy housing speculators.

So this recession will end quickly BECAUSE The One’s plans won’t impact immediately.

Of course, by then complete control of the banks will belong to the The One and the DemComs.

Liberty is dead, my friends. Liberty is dead.

klickink.wordpress.com on January 21, 2009 at 9:10 PM

Government failing again…………

…………. let’s just throw 10 more Trillion at it.

After all………… Government will never be held accountable.

Seven Percent Solution on January 21, 2009 at 9:12 PM

Forget the friggin’ pot holes and cut taxes….duh!

jcheney on January 21, 2009 at 9:12 PM

So who would you want to be on the bazillion dollar bill?

Weight of Glory on January 21, 2009 at 9:02 PM

A bill like that is worthy of two pictures. I’d suggest both Bush and Obama.

FloatingRock on January 21, 2009 at 9:13 PM

Oh what the hell, give us the money anyway..says the DFL.

I look forward to the new streets named after Franken, the Wellstone Museum of Liberalism, perhaps a few government buildings in honor of Obarfy, filled of course with eager liberals on the gubmint payroll.

Bishop on January 21, 2009 at 9:16 PM

I suspect part of the reason for this is that the Democrats want to increase the budget baseline to pave the way for Gov. healthcare in the future. Each year’s budget baseline is based on the previous year’s budget.

goat on January 21, 2009 at 9:23 PM

As I posted elsewhere-
We’ve been had…

Apple’s Profit Trounces Estimates on Holiday Sales

Bank of America Soars as Lewis, Directors Buy Shares

That and IBM posted strong earnings and predictions for a strong 2009.

This shows the economy is already recovering or, at least, bottomed out. This should be enough to free up the credit markets and then the BILLIONS of cash is going to start flooding back out.

Skywise on January 21, 2009 at 9:25 PM

A bill like that is worthy of two pictures. I’d suggest both Bush and Obama.

FloatingRock on January 21, 2009 at 9:13 PM

Heh. I like it.

Weight of Glory on January 21, 2009 at 9:26 PM

But..but..but…what about Kenya!

canopfor on January 21, 2009 at 9:30 PM

Skywise on January 21, 2009 at 9:25 PM

I agree even here in Ca. the housing market is slowly turning aroud with the the first positive uptick since ‘04-’05.

goat on January 21, 2009 at 9:33 PM

As long as they are trying to throw money around, how about a MASSIVE retroactive Tax Cut for 08, and then extend it into 09? Dollars would get into the economy pretty quickly.

juanito on January 21, 2009 at 9:36 PM

“Barack Obama has named his priorities for rebuilding America as infrastructure WPA and alternative energy CCC.”

“Less than half the money dedicated to highways, school construction and other infrastructure projects in a massive economic stimulus package unveiled by House Democrats is likely to be spent within the next two years, according to congressional budget analysts, meaning most of the spending would come too late to lift the nation out of recession.”

Oh, that’s alright, once they were enacted, the WPA and CCC lasted for the rest of the depression.

burt on January 21, 2009 at 9:45 PM

Interestingly, the Post ran this on the front page of their business section, page D-1, rather than on the front page of the newspaper.

I’m suprised that it made the cover of the business section,especially the day after the coronation. I’m impressed. The Post’s survival instinct must be kicking in; starting a debate is going to sell more papers than praising every move Obama makes. Not that I all of a sudden trust the media. They’ll be back to their old selves come 2012.

Theworldisnotenough on January 21, 2009 at 9:54 PM

Is there any inflation correction built into the stimulus package?
Just a thought: If hyperinflation hits within the next couple of years, that stimulus package won’t buy more than a wheelbarrow full of bread.

ZenDraken on January 21, 2009 at 9:55 PM

There is actually very little in the stimulus package the the Pelosi sent up that will stimulate anything much less the economy. Its full of very greasy pork for left wing interests with a small handfull of worthy projects here’s a small sample of what’s in it.

-$6 billion to weatherize “modest income homes.”
-$6 billion to provide internet in “underserved” areas
-$6 billion for “higher education modernization.”
-$20 billion in health information technology to “prevent medial mistakes.”
-$20 billion to increase food stamp funding
-$87 billion to provide a “temporary” increase in Medicaid funding
-$300 million to provide rebates for people who purchase Energy Star products
-$600 million for the federal government to buy brand new energy efficient cars
-$400 million for state and local governments to buy brand new energy efficient cars
-$2.4 billion for carbon capture demonstration programs
-$350 million to research using energy efficient technology on military bases
-$300 million for grants and loans to state and local governments for projects that reduce diesel emissions, “benefiting public health and reducing global warming”
-$500 million for energy efficient manufacturing demonstration projects.
-$400 million to build major research facilities “that perform cutting edge science”
-$1.5 billion for expanding “good jobs in biomedical research”
-$400 million “to put more scientists to work doing climate change research”
-$600 million for satellite development and acquisitions, including climate sensors and climate modeling.
-$250 million “to address long-term economic distress in urban industrial cores and rural areas distributed based on need and ability to create jobs and attract private investment.”
-$650 million to continue the coupon program to enable American households to convert from analog television transmission to digital transmission.
-$300 million for the National Wildlife Refuges and National Fish Hatcheries
-$50 million for the National Endowment for the Arts
-$400 million for “ready-to-go habitat restoration projects”
-$2 billion to provide child care services for an additional 300,000 children in low-income families while their parents go to work.
-$120 million to provide subsidized community service jobs to an additional 24,000 low-income older Americans
-$1.5 billion to help local communities build and rehabilitate low-income housing using green technologies.
-$500 million to rehabilitate and improve energy efficiency at some of the over 42,000 housing units maintained by Native American housing programs
-$10 million for “rural, high-need areas to undertake projects using sustainable and energy-efficient building and rehabilitation practices”

goat on January 21, 2009 at 9:57 PM

I hope the Republicans have the guts to vote against this. Let the Democrats explain in the run-up to the Presidential election why the economy is still weak, which I think it will be. Don’t forget that this housing and now stock market wipeout hit a lot of people near retirement. My hunch is a lot of Baby Boomers are already starting to live like they’re retired, i.e. much more mindful of every dollar. The perception that the stimulus package “worked” is unlikely in the minds of the voters. The Democrats are trying to be too clever in holding the spending until near the next election.

Tax and spending cuts are the only way to go to get the economy growing quickly.

venividivici on January 21, 2009 at 10:00 PM

The Mother of All Pork.

… but I repeat myself.

The more money, the more waste. It’s the congress, stupid.

fogw on January 21, 2009 at 10:11 PM

Smarter people than me have said, but here it is:

This was easy. Obama’s pork BBQ festival had nothing to do with “stimulating the economy” of the nation; he just wants to stimulate the economy of his patronage operation. He’s from Chicago – time to pay back the mob that put him in office.

It’s like that imbecile Friedman was babbling out – “clean energy” BS, and union job scams, and liberal pie-in-the-sky crap. It’s all just pork a la Democrap.

Jaibones on January 21, 2009 at 10:42 PM

-$6 billion to provide internet in “underserved” areas

I guess now they’ll be able to surf gubmint sponsored gay porn on Brokeback Mountain.

Bikerken on January 21, 2009 at 10:43 PM

I agree even here in Ca. the housing market is slowly turning aroud with the the first positive uptick since ‘04-’05.

goat on January 21, 2009 at 9:33 PM

Maybe where you are. In San Diego it is still tanking. CA made it take longer to foreclose which has just delayed the inevitable. What I have noticed, since I’m shopping the market, is that the nicer homes, the homes people took the time to rehab and that look half decent are coming on the market. People are just too far upside down to stay in the homes. Would you continue to pay on a $474,000 loan when the house is worth $200,000?

California’s terrible economy will distort and deepen the housing market trough. It ain’t over.

Theworldisnotenough on January 21, 2009 at 10:49 PM

I also remember there being a deeper story to the CA housing uptick than just that “normal people” are buying again. From what I read, it was well-capitalized landlords who were buying the homes and then putting them on the rental market, with the intention of selling them when the market really turns, which will just put that inventory right back on the market.

As for the shares Lewis bought today, that’s not such a large amount of money for a guy like him. Lewis is Exhibit A of a guy who should by rights have almost no money at all, after what he’s done to Bank of America and Bank of America is trying to do to taxpayers.

http://seekingalpha.com/article/115502-preventing-the-greatest-heist-in-history

venividivici on January 21, 2009 at 11:10 PM

In other news, best way to inject money into the economy: tax cuts.

Change you can believe in because you failed microecon 101!

juanito gets an A!

Beagle on January 21, 2009 at 11:17 PM

Theworldisnotenough on January 21, 2009 at 10:49 PM

I have heard it from a few sources that people are taking advantage of the depressed prices to buy now.

To answer your question, yes if I could maintain the payments because it will turn around despite those idiots in Sac’to. I am in NoCal and my area didn’t get hit as hard as some because we didn’t escalate as fast.

goat on January 21, 2009 at 11:20 PM

venividivici on January 21, 2009 at 11:10 PM

That could be true, most of what I have heard has been on the radio, at least the houses are moving and being occupied. That is better than a foreclosed home gathering weeds and hobos.

goat on January 21, 2009 at 11:27 PM

It was illegals who pushed the SoCal market to extremes. If you came across the border with nothing but the shirt on your back and were making a few bucks mowing lawns and some dirtbag offered you a $400,000 home loan for just a signature, why wouldn’t you take it? What have you got to loose? If the price goes up, you take a home loan and get a new Hummer. If the price goes down, you walk away losing nothing you had to begin with. I had no less than nine friends in the realty business down here just over two years ago and I’ve heard all the stories about who they were selling to. All I can say is, if it was that prevelant here, you extrapolate that out to the rest of the country and it was probably trillions of dollars of homeloans that went to illegals in No-Doc loans. Who didn’t see this coming?

Bikerken on January 21, 2009 at 11:34 PM

goat,

Sure, I just mean those houses aren’t in the hands of people who really want to own them, they’re just flipping them, albeit with a longer time horizon than the old flipping model.

If you’re interested, here’s a site that provides good housing story links:

http://seekingalpha.com/tag/housing?source=bigpicdash_more

There are many others, too, of course.

One of my tasks at work is to follow insurance companies’ investment portfolios, so I read about real estate all the time.

venividivici on January 21, 2009 at 11:36 PM

Last year, the Heritage Foundation published “backgrounder” on infrastructure spending with results pulled from studies by the CBO, DOT, and, most importantly, GAO.

April 2, 2008
Backgrounder #2121
More Transportation Spending: False Promises of Prosperity and Job Creation

December 16, 2008
Backgrounder #2222
Learning from Japan: Infrastructure Spending Won’t Boost the Economy

hatespam on January 22, 2009 at 12:21 AM

Well, the good news is that if the GOP wins back congress in 2010, it could provide a great opportunity to trash the last two years of this program.

The low, low oil price combined with huge excess inventory of manufactured goods will keep inflation down for a while yet.

I am a bit curious why my gasoline costs 20 cents more a gallon now than it did 2 months ago. Does anybody know why?

funky chicken on January 22, 2009 at 12:29 AM

Since the economy is cyclical,

This is not the result of any cyclical phenomenon this time. America has been spending more than it takes in for over 30 years. The housing bubble caused the spending of borrowed money. That money can not be paid back. It’s been spent. America will need to go on a diet that will have to last at least 10 years. It will take 10 years of deprivation to balance the books.

keep the change on January 22, 2009 at 1:02 AM

Bikerken on January 21, 2009 at 11:34 PM

In SoCal I am sure that is very true.

venividivici on January 21, 2009 at 11:36 PM

I hear ya, the market is slowly beginning to turn around though despite the nitwits in the capitol.

funky chicken on January 22, 2009 at 12:29 AM

I asked my contact at the API that very question a few days ago. Gas prices lag oil prices by a couple weeks and oil hit 48$ three weeks ago it has since fallen. The national average increase in gas was steady at about 20 cents and mirrors that.

goat on January 22, 2009 at 1:03 AM

See what Peter Schiff has to say on this topic.

keep the change on January 22, 2009 at 1:06 AM

It’s never too late to pad your off shore account.

Limerick on January 22, 2009 at 1:58 AM

I hope the Republicans have the guts to vote against this.
venividivici

There’s that word “hope” again.
Get your disappointment over with early, venividivici. The vast majority of (what’s left of) the Republicans in Congress know which way the wind is blowing and have no spine to stand against it. The Party may not be dead, but it’s coughing up blood and not looking at all well.

SKYFOX on January 22, 2009 at 6:43 AM

Okun was as Keynsian as you can get yet from experience he believed that changes in tax rates were the proper lever for government stimulation. The CBO has just confirmed what Okun knew thirty years ago.

jerryofva on January 21, 2009 at 8:58 PM

Reducing tax rates may stimulate the economy but it won’t stimulate Obama’s voter base — the entitlement crowd –
because they don’t pay income taxes (and the illegal alien voters in his base also don’t pay property taxes, vehicle taxes, etc.). That’s why the proven-to-work mechanism of lowering taxes doesn’t really appeal to Obama as much as the proven-not-to-work massive gov’t spending does.

AZCoyote on January 22, 2009 at 7:56 AM

Every Republican better spout this talking point in EVERY INTERVIEW.

marklmail on January 22, 2009 at 8:18 AM

@&%$^@)$* Keynes and FDR for coming up with this crap. This sort of nonsense didn’t work for them and it’s not going to work again… and everybody but the stupid politicians knows it. This is what we get for electing hoardes of Political Science majors turned Lawyers.

fiscallyconservative on January 22, 2009 at 9:44 AM

Then again, given the market tank this morning… I could be wrong…

Skywise on January 22, 2009 at 10:32 AM

This shows the economy is already recovering or, at least, bottomed out. This should be enough to free up the credit markets and then the BILLIONS of cash is going to start flooding back out.

Skywise on January 21, 2009 at 9:25 PM

Don’t bet on it. There is still plenty of fall left. I predict late 2010 before things turn around.

Vashta.Nerada on January 22, 2009 at 11:35 AM

G’Damn You, president McCain !!!… Damn you to hell…..

oh wait…

nevermind

franksalterego on January 22, 2009 at 12:14 PM

Isn’t 2011 when the Bush Tax Cuts expire? Coincidence?

jedijson on January 22, 2009 at 12:53 PM

“Private capital creates jobs much faster than anything proposed in this package.”

The problem is that a huge amount of jobs had been produced by two things. One was a housing boom generated by easy mortgages. The second was people constantly pulling the appreciated equity out of their existing homes through easy “home equity loans”, refinances, and other home equity lines of credit. A lot of cars, boats, vacations, furnishings and home repairs were purchased with home equity. It was a huge source of value to the millions of homeowners and for over a decade, their houses were like oil wells gushing cash.

Home equity was the fuel the kept the economy hot. Trowing money into the fire to keep it going works, but only as long as you keep throwing money into the fire. Government can artificially pump up spending but the minute they cut the spending off the economy stops again unless the spending produces some fundamental improvement that adds value to the economy (and to people) that lasts well after the cash flow has stopped.

They would be better off to do things like emergency temporary elimination or modification of some of the more onerous Sarbanes/Oxley requirements, pulling back the red tape, facilitating loans to businesses to allow them to expand and reduce what is the world’s second highest corporate tax rate that is pushing our companies offshore in order to compete with foreign firms who are not burdened by as much corporate tax. Increasing taxes on corporations simply forces them to flee and instead of a higher percentage of their earnings, we end up with 100% of nothing.

A regulation that would make it illegal for states to have higher minimum wage than the federal minimum would help too. States that have had the greatest increases in minimum wage are seeing the highest increases in unemployment. Higher minimum wage does not generate a better standard of living, it generates higher unemployment.

crosspatch on January 22, 2009 at 12:54 PM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.