Hamas agrees to cease-fire, declares victory
posted at 8:14 am on January 19, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
To no one’s great surprise, Hamas declared victory after agreeing to an Israeli cease-fire for a week after getting pummeled throughout Gaza for the past three weeks. The declaration amounts to a poor attempt at face-saving, as its leadership has been decimated and its infrastructure heavily damaged — and since the IDF remains in position in Gaza:
In a speech broadcast on Hamas television on Sunday night, Hamas prime minister Ismail Haniyeh said the Palestinians had achieved a historical and strategic victory over Israel, and claimed that Israel’s military operation in the Gaza Strip had failed.
The Hamas leader repeated the terror organization’s demand for a complete Israeli withdrawal from the Strip, and for the opening of the border crossings.
Note to Hamas: When the enemy has its army encamped in your territory and you have to make demands for them to leave when the fighting stops, you didn’t win. They had a cease-fire in place in December, without Israeli soldiers all over Gaza, and Hamas ended it in a hail of missile and rocket fire. A month later, several of their top people are dead, Gaza has been heavily damaged, and they’re isolated politically among other Arab nations, plus the IDF is now holding Gaza in a vise grip, and all Hamas has is another cease-fire. Yeah … some victory.
Their declaration of victory isn’t all that newsworthy. The Iranian agreement to honor the cease-fire signals a big change in Tehran’s position:
Meanwhile, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called Hamas leader in Syria Khaled Mashaal and congratulated him on the “great victory” the Palestinians had achieved over the IDF, the Iranian IRNA news agency reported on Monday morning.
According to the report, Ahmadinejad said that this was “just the beginning of the victory, which will be completed with patience.”
The Iranian president reportedly said the victory will be complete once Israel withdraws its forces from the Gaza Strip, lifts the siege and opens the border crossings, and when Islamic countries “break off contacts with the Zionist regime and its sponsors.”
Earlier, Iran had threatened to cut off funds to Hamas if they agreed to a cease-fire. That opened a split between Hamas leadership in Gaza and the international leadership in Damascus. The Iranian retreat speaks much louder about Hamas’ performance in this war than Hamas’ self-serving pronouncements. Iran realized, perhaps after Israel easily destroyed the special commando group that Iran trained, that Hamas would at best barely survive this war.
Iran can paint their retreat in hosannas of flowery praise, but even their statement recognizes the defeat Hamas suffered. The victory will be “complete”, Iran says, when Israel retreats from Gaza, ends its border control, and everyone in the world ends contacts with Israel. Well, sure, if that had happened, Israel would have lost. Unfortunately for Iran, none of it has happened, and except for the withdrawal, none of it will as long as Iran’s proxy terrorist group remains in control of Gaza. Tehran knows it lost this gambit, and they’re trying to bolster Hamas’ reputation after a disastrous provocation exposed them as lousy terrorists and even worse soldiers.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
An Israeli victory, with one day to spare no less.
rob verdi on January 19, 2009 at 8:18 AM
You have to understand that this concept doesn’t exist in the arab world, where “total scorched Earth” is the normal method of operation (which is why they use suicide bombers and societally suicidal strategies).
The fact is that Israel has blown it, again.
progressoverpeace on January 19, 2009 at 8:20 AM
I love it when a plan comes together…
twiggman on January 19, 2009 at 8:20 AM
Short answer: A black Knight victory.
Long answer here, with very funny Hamas poster.
petertheslow on January 19, 2009 at 8:21 AM
Hamas dead: thousands.
Israeli dead, dozens.
Sure, you win, Hamas!
jgapinoy on January 19, 2009 at 8:27 AM
Iran’s nuclear ambitions remain on a “full systems ahead” fast track status. This remains very bothersome for the world order.
For the past several years, we have heard nothing but “Iran will not be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon.” Hamas and Gaza appear to be nothing other than a simple move on a chess board for Iran.
Keemo on January 19, 2009 at 8:30 AM
Egyptian kids are still being taught that Egypt won the ’73 war, and they believe it. The way arabs think is much different from the West and we have to realize that. It doesn’t matter how we view the outcome, it is how they view it that determines their future actions, and they see weakness in Israel and the West. The number of dead arabs means nothing to them.
progressoverpeace on January 19, 2009 at 8:30 AM
They are just taking a short break for the start of round 78.8
Key word is time and patience,these bastards have a101 year plan,we have the one.
Col.John Wm. Reed on January 19, 2009 at 8:36 AM
I dunno…as I see it, Hamas is victorious. They weren’t wiped out. Israel made the mistake…again…of offering a cease-fire.
How long until Hamas regroups, rearms, and there are more dead Israeli civilians?
JetBoy on January 19, 2009 at 8:36 AM
Well said.
These two sentences explain why they hide behind & otherwise exploit children.
jgapinoy on January 19, 2009 at 8:37 AM
the other “winner” is the Anti-American/Pro-Jihadi/Anti-Semitic/Anti-White Racist Marxist-Muslim, Barack HUSSEIN Obama (PBUH)(SWT)(SAW), about to enter the Oval Office tomorrow.
Shame on America, and shame on the American Voters.
7 Years after the Jihadis attacked America and murdered 3000 of our fellow citizens, the brain-addilpated American voters have elected a Jihadi, one of the enemy, as President of the Unites States.
Every day I wake up, I feel as if I’ve fallen down the Rabbit Hole…
Dale in Atlanta on January 19, 2009 at 8:38 AM
And I would add that the real victory Hamas had in Europe was really astounding, in a very, very scary way. They know who Europe is cheering for and that matters quite a bit – don’t kid yourselves. With BHO about to take office, here, and what we have in Europe, I can’t see how anyone thinks this situation is anything but more deadly than it ever was, and more precarious for Israel.
progressoverpeace on January 19, 2009 at 8:40 AM
Yep. And it’s a win-win for them, given the way the West thinks, these days.
progressoverpeace on January 19, 2009 at 8:42 AM
The timing of Israel’s action was definately not coincidental. They somehow got wind of some of Barry’s foreign policy plans. If Barry meets with Achmedinejad soon, then we’ll know.
kingsjester on January 19, 2009 at 8:44 AM
definately=definitely
oops. Too early
kingsjester on January 19, 2009 at 8:44 AM
Imagine if the Eagles claimed victory yesterday, simply because Arizona left the field after the game.
SuperManGreenLantern on January 19, 2009 at 8:45 AM
Your just as delusional as the Hamas terrorist group is in declaring victory. Obama as a Jihadi, that’s a bit much.
Ric on January 19, 2009 at 8:46 AM
I always find myself wondering who these terrorists are lying to. Do they really believe all this victory baloney? Do they really believe their own lies? The latter is the mark of really troubled people I think. Then, out of the woodwork, comes the secondary lying support(read that Iran).
jeanie on January 19, 2009 at 8:47 AM
Your just as delusional as the Hamas terrorist group is in declaring victory. Obama as a Jihadi, that’s a bit much.
Ric on January 19, 2009 at 8:46 AM
Willful ignorance is the first indication of stupidity…
Dale in Atlanta on January 19, 2009 at 8:48 AM
Hamas did not win, but then neither did Israel.
Business as usual.
Is this just an “Obama Inauguration” cease fire to start up later this week?
Watch for Hillary to be in Israel on January 21 making the usual rounds.
albill on January 19, 2009 at 8:50 AM
So basically, Isreal decided to bomb the hell out of Gaza until Obama was inaugurated and….now what? Its up to the U.S. to organize the peace process (again) and try to get these idiotic adversaries to see each other as human (again). I say cut off all military aid to Isreal, ignore the Palestinians and let them just figure it out. We’ve got out own messes to deal with and I just can’t be bothered to care about Isreal or the Palestinians. What “interests” are we protecting again? Are there natural resources, emerging markets, some critical trade or technology? If not then I just don’t get it.
DeathToMediaHacks on January 19, 2009 at 8:50 AM
Gee, that was an even greater victory than the one the Republicans achieved over the Democrats in the 2008 election.
backwoods conservative on January 19, 2009 at 8:54 AM
They must have been taking “Spin” lessons from our Democrat brothers……
DL13 on January 19, 2009 at 8:54 AM
It’s in our nation interest to help fellow democracies fight islamofascism. Shall we sit back & let Abu Sayef overrun the Philippines? Or allow Columbia to fall to Venezuela?
jgapinoy on January 19, 2009 at 8:54 AM
It was in our interests to keep Grenada free. It was in our interests to defeat the Sandinistas. It was in our interest to demand that Gorby “tear down the wall”.
jgapinoy on January 19, 2009 at 8:56 AM
May Hamas have many more such “victories”
rbj on January 19, 2009 at 8:58 AM
When did Bahgdad Bob arrive in Gaza?
titus_pullo on January 19, 2009 at 8:59 AM
Reuters-January 19th, 2009:
The Eagles and Ravens both declared victory yesterday and pledge to meet one another in the Super Bowl.
Bishop on January 19, 2009 at 9:00 AM
Spell check next time. I understand, it’s not in your nature to be patient when you are doing your level best to either get people to agree with your moronic statement that Barack Obama is a Jihadist, or begin flaming the bejeezus out of you for calling someone who disagrees with said statement ignorant and stupid. Then you can climb back onto Daily Kos or Democratic Underground and talk about what close-minded bigots we are.
That went a long way just to say, please take your trollish comments else places. Thank you.
Spc Steve on January 19, 2009 at 9:03 AM
Unfortunately, the people there certainly do. It might seem insane to us, but to them it is believable. Look at all the lies they tell, and that their people believe, all the time. This is arab culture and why we have such a hard time understanding why they do the things they do.
progressoverpeace on January 19, 2009 at 9:05 AM
That went a long way just to say, please take your trollish comments else places. Thank you.
Spc Steve on January 19, 2009 at 9:03 AM
Ah, okay, sure, whatever.
I’ll make you a bet; four years from now, come back here, and we’ll see who had done more to advance the cause of the Jihadis worldwide, over that time period: Barack HUSSEIN Obama (PBUH)(SAW)(SWT), or say…Bin Laden!
I’ll promise you, it will be a bet that you will lose, and that I will win!
Count on it!
Dale in Atlanta on January 19, 2009 at 9:07 AM
Cease fire until when…what tomorrow?
mindhacker on January 19, 2009 at 9:07 AM
That went a long way just to say, please take your trollish comments else places. Thank you.
Spc Steve on January 19, 2009 at 9:03 AM
PS: PLEASE spell check next time!
Dale in Atlanta on January 19, 2009 at 9:08 AM
al-Qaeda tape released on March 14, 2004, after the Madrid attack:
“You love life and we love death.”
Never forget their ideology.
Loxodonta on January 19, 2009 at 9:09 AM
So, in the interest of a bet, you’re hoping that Barack Obama advances the cause of Islam, which will, invariably, result in American soldiers such as myself and my brothers in arms, and citizens, such as my wife and child, being killed, as genuine Jihadists hope and pray for? Or am I totally misunderstanding your statement?
I will say that one of us is complaining that the President-Elect is a Jihadist, and one of is doing his part to stop Jihadists in their tracks in Southwest Asia. I leave it to you to figure out which is which.
Spc Steve on January 19, 2009 at 9:12 AM
Do they really believe their own lies?
Those savages tote around the severed heads of Israeli soldiers to show off, I believe they are capable of just about anything.
Bishop on January 19, 2009 at 9:14 AM
Oh, and “else places” contains no misspelled words. It is, however, a grammatical turn of phrase, a shortened version of “someplace else.”
Spc Steve on January 19, 2009 at 9:14 AM
If Israel ceased fireing knowing there is still enough of Hamas left to even issue that statement, then the statement is correct. Hamas won.
Consider if you had cancer and your doctors went in to cut it out but decided to leave 15% or 20% of it just to see if Your body could tolerate that much. You’d stil have cancer but now you’d also have to fight it while trying to recover from a surgery.
MikeA on January 19, 2009 at 9:15 AM
Thank you for your honorable service, sir.
jgapinoy on January 19, 2009 at 9:16 AM
Not a good analogy. It would work if your surgeon was under the upcoming Obamacare system, & his union contract demands that he go home at a certain time, whether he was done cutting out the cancer or not.
jgapinoy on January 19, 2009 at 9:18 AM
I thank you for your appreciation. And, incidentally, for your tax dollars, which put money in my pocket. ;)
Spc Steve on January 19, 2009 at 9:19 AM
So, in the interest of a bet, you’re hoping that Barack Obama advances the cause of Islam, which will, invariably, result in American soldiers such as myself and my brothers in arms, and citizens, such as my wife and child, being killed, as genuine Jihadists hope and pray for?
“hoping”?
NEVER!
Will he?
Undoubtedly yes, based upon his history, background, upbringing, inculcation, etc.!
Sad, but undoubtedly true!
Look, I just visited your website, which is why you post, to get people to visit your site.
Your an Active Duty Army man.
Thank you for your service.
I too was Active Duty, in the Corps.
I too, have actually devoted 30 years of my life to fighting the Jihadies.
I know more about them, and have forgotten more about them, than almost any person alive.
I identified them as a threat 30 years ago.
I was the very FIRST analyst, outside of a few select members of Academia, to identify what “Taqiyah” was, and to alert the IC about it.
I was the very first person, to identify, correctly, the Al Qaeda movement as “Qutbiyyah”, which they are.
Those are terms you need to Google, and Read up on, and understand.
I know this problem like almost no other, and aside from comments on Blogs on occasion, I do not see any publicity, nor do I choose to make my identity public, because I’m not in this for making money, nor bringing noteriety nor fame to myself.
My only concern, is America, and it’s future.
I wore the uniform of this country, and served in Iraq and Turkey and Bahrain and Oman and Syria and Egypt and Morocco and Spain and Norway and Japan and Korea, etc.
And I’ll stack my career, up against yours, any day!
I KNOW the Jihadi threat, so don’t presume to lecture me on the subject!
I know what I’m doing, and saying.
And once again, thank you for your service, even if you are misguided!
Dale in Atlanta on January 19, 2009 at 9:22 AM
Amen brother!
Someone once told me “what you are speaks so loud I can’t hear what you are saying”. For someone to claim that they are a Christian, Obama, he does not outwardly show any Christian attitudes. All of his speeches, actions etc. point in the general direction of someone who is not a Christian and that is just the beginning. Look for The keffiyeh to come on soon after the dust settles.
0321_GUY on January 19, 2009 at 9:29 AM
one other point, that I find curious.
You’re Active Duty Military, why are you running a Blog, with Political Commentary?
When I was active Duty, it was my duty, as a Marine, to support the Commander in Chief, regardless of my personal political views, which is something I did from Carter to Clinton, even though, personally, I just happened to disagree vehemently with those two gentlemen!
I never made political comments, publically, nor privately for that matter, about those gentlemen.
IF I was Active Duty right now, it would be the same, despite my obvious sincere dislike, and distrust of Mr. Obama.
But that is the way it has to be, for people in the Military.
I am not now in any way associated with the US Government, nor the US Military, none whatsoever.
So, as a Private Citizen, I can, and will take full advantage of my First Amendment Rights.
You on the other hand, are still wearing the Uniform of a US Army Soldier.
Why, pray tell, are you making Political Commentary?
I find that very illustrative!
Dale in Atlanta on January 19, 2009 at 9:29 AM
At first I thought you might be talking about America.
imshocked on January 19, 2009 at 9:40 AM
Look at all the lies they tell, and that their people believe, all the time.
It’s called “Taqiyah”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taqiyya
And don’t let the Sunnis fool you, they use it just like the Shias, while blaming and insulting the Shias for using it.
I’ve lived with, studied, and worked with Arabs and Muslims for 30 years, they’re taught from birth to lie, and that it is okay to lie, especially to non-Muslims.
Dale in Atlanta on January 19, 2009 at 9:45 AM
Yes. I was going to mention BHO worship, here, as an analogy (though it’s even closer than that).
progressoverpeace on January 19, 2009 at 9:57 AM
If you are a reporter writing about the relationship between doctors and unions, your view would be correct. If you are the patient, it makes no difference to you why the surgeon stopped short of the objective. The effect is the same.
MikeA on January 19, 2009 at 10:01 AM
Islam’s matrix does not permit for ‘defeat’. All Muhammedan history is revised to reflect noble, pious Muhammedan supremacism, . . always victorious yet perpetually a victim.
May Israel give Hamas, and the West give Islam as many such “victories” as they can instigate.
Islam delende est.
Lan Astaslem.
heroyalwhyness on January 19, 2009 at 10:01 AM
Your’s sounds like a relavent perspective on this issue. Do you have a blog where one can learn more from your experience. Thank you too, by the way, for your service.
MikeA on January 19, 2009 at 10:03 AM
My point is that a big reason that Israel stopped is spelled B H O.
jgapinoy on January 19, 2009 at 10:07 AM
This what happens when you have Libs in charge in Israel.They cave before the job is done.
thmcbb on January 19, 2009 at 10:13 AM
This great victory of Hamas over Israel reminds me of the great victories of Japan over the United States, Germany over the Allies, Argentina over Great Britain and so on.
Pax Hamas
JoeRed on January 19, 2009 at 10:16 AM
In reality he is correct simply from the standpoint that he is able to make such an announcement, is still breathing air and taking up space. They will continue to hatch jihad babies from the stepford women their culture produces, teach them hate from the cradle and the attacks on Israel will resume. Only when the Real One with the iron rod sweeps them into the sea will the peace come.
wepeople on January 19, 2009 at 10:23 AM
Dale in Atlanta is a good guy, not a troll, as are Spc Steve, et al. The verbal hyperbole, anger, and frustration over the inauguration is just spilling out right now. We are all feeling this, I suspect. But let’s avoid friendly fire. I am trying to take a few days to studiously ignore the fawning media, get some rest and balance, and hold my fire. We’ll need it soon.
Deb on January 19, 2009 at 10:26 AM
Understood, and I agree. But my point is that the world would have been insisting that Israel stop short of the objective no matter who was President of the USA. It has always been so, and Israel always seems to stop just prior to solving their problem. Today Israel’s blog site announces the ceasefire while in the same paragraph stating that the rockets may still fall in Israel. If that is true they lost.
MikeA on January 19, 2009 at 10:30 AM
Not just that. Hamas still has Gilad Shalit. Israel took no land from them. Israel suffered a near-catastrophic loss in Europe. Things are as bad in Europe for Israel (and Jews) as they have been in a long time, and everyone knows where Europe is headed.
progressoverpeace on January 19, 2009 at 10:33 AM
Agreed. I am not watching the news today or tomorrow, and I refuse to participate in the “historic” moment when racism in America is embodied in our capital. It is historic, but not a cause to rejoice. The election of a black president because he is black is as much cause for remorse as if we had elected a white president on the basis of his being white. Racism is racism, and now it is the way our nation identifies itself.
MikeA on January 19, 2009 at 10:36 AM
may Hamas and the like always enjoy that type of victory
runner on January 19, 2009 at 10:55 AM
Hama’s “victory” is the “victory” of Monty Python’s Black Knight: “Had enough, eh? Come back and take what’s coming to you, you yellow bastards! Come back here and take what’s coming to you! I’ll bite your legs off!”
Blackacre on January 19, 2009 at 11:06 AM
The difference is that Hamas will grow new arms and legs in short order.
What was needed was either Hamas signing a surrender, Gilad Shalit being returned, land being taken by Israel, or the end of Hamas’ existence as the government of Gaza.
progressoverpeace on January 19, 2009 at 11:10 AM
I especially agree with Gilad Shalit be returned. As for the others, Hamas will never sign a surrender, Israel does not want the land, and whether Hamas is able to continue its stranglehold on Gaza remains to be seen. They got their asses whipped and that’s never good for them in their honor/shame culture.
Blackacre on January 19, 2009 at 11:19 AM
Good to read that Baghdad Bob has found work with Hamas.
Mallard T. Drake on January 19, 2009 at 11:23 AM
I hope you’re correct, though getting beaten silly in military engagements has never stopped any arabs before. Saddam Hussein was busy raising cain, not 5 minutes after he suffered one of the most humiliating military defeats in all of human history – they had Iraqi soldiers surrendering to Italian journalists. And he never stopped hassling, threatening, and shooting at us, until we finally ended him.
progressoverpeace on January 19, 2009 at 11:28 AM
Jihadist logic:
defeat = victory
up = down
night = day
a Fatwa on logic?
TooTall on January 19, 2009 at 11:55 AM
nice
UNREPENTANT CONSERVATIVE CAPITOLIST on January 19, 2009 at 12:13 PM
Gene’s brother?
jgapinoy on January 19, 2009 at 12:18 PM
IDF should have finished the job!!
dalec on January 19, 2009 at 12:30 PM
This reminds me of the parades the Arab nations had at the end of Six Day War claiming victory of the IDF.
Mooseman on January 19, 2009 at 12:43 PM
U.S. War College member insists Islam does not “promote kidnappings, beheadings and other unlicensed hostile actions”
After posting a report regarding the U.S. Army War College’s failure to examine Islam’s war doctrines, including a faculty member’s (Sherifa Zuhur’s) assertions that Hamas has been “villainized” by the media, I received several e-mails from concerned people questioning Ms. Zuhur’s “credentials” — some alluded to her sincerity and intentions, or lack thereof — to teach at the War College.
One therefore has no choice but to conclude that Ms Zuhur is being either disingenuous (taqiyya/kitman) or ignorant (sign of the times), or blindly utopian (typical academic) or all of the above — either way, not fit to instruct post-9/11 America’s forthcoming guardians. It’s bad enough that this sort of fluff counts as “authoritative” around government types; but that it has also come to permeate one of the last bastions of American security, the U.S. Army War College — just consider its name — is beyond ominous.
MB4 on January 19, 2009 at 1:03 PM
Freedom of speech applies to service members. I am able to say what I want online, provided I speak, not as a representative of the military, but as a private citizen serving in the military. I support the office of the Presidency, and the Constitution. Freedom to voice my opinions are within my rights as a service member, provided I do not claim to speak for the Army as a whole, or endorse a particular person while in uniform.
Spc Steve on January 19, 2009 at 1:34 PM
I’m hoping that Israel is just declaring this so that they have time to sift through the intelligence they’ve got. Then they can put another batch of precision munitions where they’ll do the most good.
cthulhu on January 19, 2009 at 1:40 PM
Only a fool thinks that this was an Israeli victory. It was KABUKI THEATER to prevent Benjamin Netanyahu from winning the February election–this was a “wag the dog” war.
***
If Israel had a pile of 20,000 dead HAMAS terrorists with their AK-47′s and RPG’s also I would believe Israel won. This was just “round 1″ of an ongoing war.
***
Wait for the Iranian Nuke on a rocket from Gaza–only the final battle determines the winner of a war.
***
John Bibb
rocketman on January 19, 2009 at 2:49 PM
For the 8,372,454th time:
Islam has pretensions on world domination. They hate the US passionately because we represent the fact that despite Muslim prophecies to the contrary, Islam does not dominate the wealth of nations. They hate Israel passionately because Israel represents the fact that despite Muslim prophecies to the contrary, Islam does not dominate even its own home turf. That’s why the US is the Great Satan, and Israel is the Little Satan.
Muslim military attention paid to Israel is Muslim military attention not paid to the US. Israel is our proxy, a local buffer in a world-wide war. If Israel falls, then they come after us.
It’s that simple.
philwynk on January 19, 2009 at 2:53 PM
If we could just let other problem countries and entities “win” like Hamass “won” there would be a lot less trouble in the world.
Guardian on January 19, 2009 at 4:03 PM
Freedom to voice my opinions are within my rights as a service member, provided I do not claim to speak for the Army as a whole, or endorse a particular person while in uniform.
Spc Steve on January 19, 2009 at 1:34 PM
Actually, you gave up some of your “rights” when you raised your right hand, and joined the US Military.
Your “rights” are now modified, by the UCMJ, such as the prohibitions against Sodomy, and Adultery, limitations that most Americans no longer are subject too!
Additionally, your Freedom of Speech is limited by the inability to say negative or disrespectful things towards your Seniors in the Military and Civilian Chains of Command!
If you don’t know that, then I’m must plainly amazed by what they teach the new generation.
Your limitations on your Right of Free Speech, include making derogatory remarks about US Senators, US Representatives, Officials in the US Govt, etc.
Frankly, since you are Legally subject to the UCMJ, I find it amazing that you attempt to run a Political-oriented Blog.
It’s not something I would have done, when I was on Active Duty, if you can walk the tightrope, power to you, but I would have never even attempted it.
I wish you luck with it, but I think it is foolish.
Additionally, you serve in a Chain of Command, that means there are people senior to you, and subordinate to you.
What type of example are you setting for those subordinate to you, by airing your personal Political views, and what type of “ammunition”, are you putting on display, for those senior to you, who may happen to personally disagree with your opinions?
Not very wise, frankly, in either case.
Again, it’s your career, do as you wish; me, if I was in your place, I’d not attempt to be so clever and claim you are asserting your Right to Free Speech, when you are clearly goverened by the UCMJ, something which you appear to be either ignorant of, or more foolishly, are just plain willing to ignore.
However, it’s your career, and your life, live it as you wish.
It’s not something I would have done, nor is it something I condone for Active Duty Service Members.
When on Active Duty, we are charged to Serve and Defend the Constitution of the United States, and to obey the orders of those appointed above us.
When I was Active Duty, I took the charge so seriously, I even refused to Vote, so that nothing would color my perceptions of those of a different party who served above me, or below me.
It was an example that many Marine Officers followed as well.
Dale in Atlanta on January 19, 2009 at 5:58 PM
After posting a report regarding the U.S. Army War College’s failure to examine Islam’s war doctrines, including a faculty member’s (Sherifa Zuhur’s) assertions that Hamas has been “villainized” by the media, I received several e-mails from concerned people questioning Ms. Zuhur’s “credentials” — some alluded to her sincerity and intentions, or lack thereof — to teach at the War College.
One therefore has no choice but to conclude that Ms Zuhur is being either disingenuous (taqiyya/kitman) or ignorant (sign of the times), or blindly utopian (typical academic) or all of the above — either way, not fit to instruct post-9/11 America’s forthcoming guardians. It’s bad enough that this sort of fluff counts as “authoritative” around government types; but that it has also come to permeate one of the last bastions of American security, the U.S. Army War College — just consider its name — is beyond ominous.
MB4 on January 19, 2009 at 1:03 PM
MB4: you are exactly correct! Pathetic, isn’t it?
Deb: thank you for the back-up; I choose NOT to participate in something that I see as a Day of Mourning for this country!
MikeA: I tried a Blog for a few weeks; frankly, I just can’t do it, from a time perspective, and also, to remain totally anonymous which is what I crave, and for the protection of my family.
I suggest “Gates of Vienna” and Jihadwatch by Robert Spencer. Also Jawa Report, Weasel Zippers, Gateway Pundit, Doug Farah, Patrick Poole; they all “get it”.
Dale in Atlanta on January 19, 2009 at 6:04 PM