Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Tom Hanks: Prop 8 supporters are “un-American”

posted at 1:13 pm on January 16, 2009 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

The boss wonders when, precisely, it became “progressive” again to level this charge against one’s opponents. Hasn’t it always been? Just in the past few months, we’ve seen Pelosi toss it at TARP naysayers and Jennifer Granholm fling it at critics of the auto bailout. Given Biden’s framing of the economic crisis as an emergency equivalent to war, I expect to hear from Harry Reid any day now that opposing the stimulus is quasi-treason.

“The truth is this [show, "Big Love,"] takes place in Utah, the truth is these people are some bizarre offshoot of the Mormon Church, and the truth is a lot of Mormons gave a lot of money to the church to make Prop-8 happen,” he told Tarts. “There are a lot of people who feel that is un-American, and I am one of them. I do not like to see any discrimination codified on any piece of paper, any of the 50 states in America, but here’s what happens now. A little bit of light can be shed, and people can see who’s responsible, and that can motivate the next go around of our self correcting Constitution, and hopefully we can move forward instead of backwards. So let’s have faith in not only the American, but Californian, constitutional process.”

Rusty’s pithy rebuttal: “Also un-American by this definition? Americans.” Exit question one: Anything “un-American” about Jerry Brown’s attempt to have a constitutional amendment declared unconstitutional? Exit question two: How far, in his immaculate American-ness, would Hanks be willing to go to make sure “people can see who’s responsible”? This far?


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 ... 6

Wait until you see what’s in store for those who criticize Barry

Vashta.Nerada on January 16, 2009 at 1:16 PM

A little bit of light can be shed, and people can see who’s responsible,

With help from Prop 8 supporters who Google-map the addresses of all the anti-Prop 8 donors.

Wethal on January 16, 2009 at 1:16 PM

self correcting Constitution

They had Spellcheck and Grammarcheck in 1789? Who knew?

Wethal on January 16, 2009 at 1:17 PM

So let’s have faith in not only the American, but Californian, constitutional process.”

It happened already, Mr. Hanks, it’s called voting. CA approved it overwhelmingly and now you want the voices of californians to be challenged in court? That is Un-American!

beththebaker on January 16, 2009 at 1:17 PM

I read this article and wondered how long it would take for Allah to post it up. It’s perfect…regards Mormons and gays and Hollywood. AP needs his own “red meat” image.

Maybe a stick stirring a pile of ants.

Sarjex on January 16, 2009 at 1:18 PM

so tired of these whiny little closed minded bitches screeching about how gays have a “right” to take away the rights of millions of people in a society on how they define their social institutions.

Drunk Report on January 16, 2009 at 1:18 PM

The people of California voted this down…trying to overturn the will of the people is UN-AMERICAN!

Another celebrity opening his mouth….shut up and dance, bee-otch!

HornetSting on January 16, 2009 at 1:19 PM

Un-American, anti-gay, anti-woman, and we like to eat babies.

Or something.

Gotta hand it to the anti-Prop 8s.

They just keep the chorus right on going.

Hawkins1701 on January 16, 2009 at 1:19 PM

This from a guy whose big break came from dressing up as a woman to be able to live in an all woman apartment building.

Bosom Buddies?

http://media.sacbee.com/smedia/2007/03/08/22/302-Hanks_Scolari_2_1_.embedded.prod_affiliate.4.jpg

portlandon on January 16, 2009 at 1:19 PM

Liberals only have faith in “processes” (elections, constititutions, whatever) when the outcome is in their favor. Hence, Christine Gregoire’s comment after all the recounts, and “newly discovered ballots”: “Isn’t democracy wonderful!”

Wethal on January 16, 2009 at 1:20 PM

No mention of the other 48 states which also don’t allow gay marriage? There seems to be a lot of un-American Americans living in America.

Bishop on January 16, 2009 at 1:20 PM

The civilized thing to do would be to go our separate ways.

JiangxiDad on January 16, 2009 at 1:21 PM

Liberals believe that tolerance means other people must tolerate their viewpoints, not that they have to tolerate opposing viewpoints.

jukin on January 16, 2009 at 1:21 PM

I do not like to see any discrimination codified on any piece of paper, any of the 50 states in America, but here’s what happens now.

That gets my vote for the dumbest statement of 2009 by an ill-informed “celebrity” so far.

awake on January 16, 2009 at 1:22 PM

Change we can believe in. The arrogance is mind numbing.

americanpatriot on January 16, 2009 at 1:22 PM

And it wasn’t just the Mormons who voted for Prop 8, it was blacks who came out in overwhelming numbers to vote yes. But Tom can’t mention them because a certain sorta black guy is soon to become POTUS.

Besides, why am I supposed to care about what an actor has to say about anything? What makes them experts?

Bishop on January 16, 2009 at 1:23 PM

The people of California voted this down…trying to overturn the will of the people is UN-AMERICAN!

HornetSting on January 16, 2009 at 1:19 PM

The people of California should have listened to their enlightened, tolerant betters, and not some Bible-believing, teetotalling preachers. Give the vote to people who bitterly cling to their guns and God and who knows what result you’ll get.

Wethal on January 16, 2009 at 1:24 PM

/sarc off

Wethal on January 16, 2009 at 1:24 PM

Wethal on January 16, 2009 at 1:24 PM

Democracy’s a bitch.

HornetSting on January 16, 2009 at 1:25 PM

So now the definition of an American has to include not only gay sex, but gay marriage?

And all the voters in Calif. voting against gay marriage were Mormon’s…I didn’t know that the majority of blacks were Mormon’s.
Those black people, Hanks know you are un-americian…his racism is finally exposed, blacks are only useful to liberals when they vote the way they want them to vote.

right2bright on January 16, 2009 at 1:26 PM

Besides, why am I supposed to care about what an actor has to say about anything? What makes them experts?

Bishop on January 16, 2009 at 1:23 PM

Right, but a nation and a society is suppose to have a culture. We have none but the lowbrow common mtv-type culture comprised of ho’s, thugs, criminals, skanks, exhibitionists, intellectual cretins, etc. People need and miss culture, so they listen to the one they’ve got. I bet you miss belonging to one too. I do. This situation can’t last much longer without one side capitulating.

JiangxiDad on January 16, 2009 at 1:28 PM

Are these the same type of “un-Americans” that voted for Obama?

Darbraun on January 16, 2009 at 1:28 PM

Come on, Tom.
you’re better than this.
Or did the role in “Philadelphia” go to your head?

ToddonCapeCod on January 16, 2009 at 1:29 PM

It’s every American’s God-given right to think anything they want, believe anything they want, worship anything they want and say anything they want.

Hanks only believes it if it falls in line w/whatever he thinks, believes, worships or says.

JAM on January 16, 2009 at 1:30 PM

“I’m not a smart man.”

Tony737 on January 16, 2009 at 1:31 PM

Allah, I disagree with you on this one. This is not like other “un-American” charges. He says exactly what he means by it: “I do not like to see any discrimination codified on any piece of paper.” You can disagree that Prop 8 falls under that category, but that’s clearly a core and uniquely American value.

This is very different than claiming that people who oppose the war, TARP, the auto bailout, and the stimulus are un-American. It is in fact *very* American to voice your opinion in a debate over issues. What he’s saying here is that the proposition itself is un-American because it goes against core American values; he’s not saying that the act of voicing your opinion in support of Prop 8 is un-American. Whether you agree or not, those are two very different things, and it’s unfair to claim that there’s hypocrisy here.

tneloms on January 16, 2009 at 1:32 PM

Yeah, and he probably doesn’t know anyone who voted for Bush, either.

Socratease on January 16, 2009 at 1:32 PM

I wonder how much faith Hanks will have in the “constitutional process” if the CA Supreme Court rejects the challenge to Prop 8, and holds it to be a valid amendment.

Start the recall “process” on the justices?

Wethal on January 16, 2009 at 1:33 PM

With help from Prop 8 supporters who Google-map the addresses of all the anti-Prop 8 donors.

Wethal on January 16, 2009 at 1:16 PM

Makes me wish I had donated.

Those black people, Hanks know you are un-americian…his racism is finally exposed, blacks are only useful to liberals when they vote the way they want them to vote.

right2bright on January 16, 2009 at 1:26 PM

The Left thinks blacks are too stupid to make informed decisions. And now that I think about it, those who have been lambasting black Californians for voting for Prop. 8 are actually giving blacks credit for being thinking individuals.

baldilocks on January 16, 2009 at 1:34 PM

You lost Mr. Hanks, get over it.

Johan Klaus on January 16, 2009 at 1:34 PM

Can’t believe I got to say it first in this thread..

Stupid is, as stupid does….

and of course….

Sorry I ruined you black panther pahty…

Romeo13 on January 16, 2009 at 1:35 PM

In regards to Rusty’s rebuttal (“Also un-American by this definition?”), that’s not a very convincing argument. As I said above, Hanks says exactly what he means by un-American, which has to do with discrimination.

I don’t think you’re barred from claiming something is un-American if the majority of the population supports it. The Supreme Court striking down popular laws is a perfect example of that.

tneloms on January 16, 2009 at 1:35 PM

correcting Constitution

The living, breathing document.

Johan Klaus on January 16, 2009 at 1:35 PM

I do not like to see any discrimination codified on any piece of paper,

Presumably, then, it was wrong to require Utah to outlaw polygamy to gain admission into the Union? One man and one woman? Two men? Two women? Two women and one man? Doesn’t matter- right, Tom?

Wethal on January 16, 2009 at 1:36 PM

I do not like to see any discrimination codified on any piece of paper, any of the 50 states in America, but here’s what happens now.

That’s a little simple-minded, isn’t it Tom? Our laws reflect all kinds of “discrimination.” Minors are discriminated against when it comes to drinking and having sex. Felons are discriminated against when they want to vote or own a gun. Surely you’re not suggesting that these rules are odious when “codified on a piece of paper”, are you?

Anyway, gays are not discriminated against under law. Gays have precisely the same rights to heterosexual marriage as everyone else in society. That gays might prefer not to exercise that right doesn’t mean they are entitled to a new right as a substitute.

In the civil rights movement, blacks didn’t demand better or different rights than the rest of society. They didn’t insist on a uniquely “black” set of civil rights. They only wanted the rights that the everyone else enjoyed.
Somewhere between then and now, the idea of civil rights changed from one group not wanting to be excluded from the mainstream, to one group demanding its own set of unique preferences enshrined in law.

Cicero43 on January 16, 2009 at 1:36 PM

Sorry I ruined you black panther pahty…

Romeo13 on January 16, 2009 at 1:35 PM

My FAVORITE line from that movie…..lmao.

HornetSting on January 16, 2009 at 1:36 PM

Hanks really turned out to be a total whack job. Was “Bosom Buddies” reality TV?

Are these people too stupid to understand that a great majority of Americans do not wish to see the definition of marriage hijacked by the same distorted perspective that turned the words “rainbow” and “gay” into something queer?

This sure falls into the category of taking creation and distorting it into something completely unrecognizable. Lets bend reality to suit people that are attracted to the same sex. Gee, what could go wrong?

Hening on January 16, 2009 at 1:36 PM

I support gay marriage, but only if approved by voters. And guess what? The voters spoke. Prop 8 won, the gay marriage lobby lost. Deal with it! Go back to the drawing board, come up with a new campaign to promote your cause, and take another shot in a future election cycle.

While my support for gay marriage remains strong, my patience with the gay rights lobbyists is growing thin. If you really believe in your cause, then go out there and convince voters why they’re wrong about this. Targeting Mormons and random old ladies, calling people un-American, and using judges and lawyers to overturn a constitutional amendment is NOT the way to win anyone over. It’s a form of bullying, and seems to be the modus operandi of the left these days.

Doughboy on January 16, 2009 at 1:37 PM

Hey Hanks! Fuck you!

GarandFan on January 16, 2009 at 1:37 PM

I don’t think you’re barred from claiming something is un-American if the majority of the population supports it. The Supreme Court striking down popular laws is a perfect example of that.

tneloms on January 16, 2009 at 1:35 PM

That’s quite a stretch……”Majority of the Population”-are you talking about MTV and the MSM???

HornetSting on January 16, 2009 at 1:37 PM

They publish the names and addresses of these people like a hit list. I don’t understand how they can get away with these public threats like this.

How would they like it if some anti-gay movement decided that they would out and map addresses of all gay people in America? Would they support such an action or would they automatically say ‘homophobic’ and ‘racist/discriminatory’ that they are ‘threatening’ gay people by publishing their home addresses.

Gay people want a war. . . but they are much more like the Palestinians than the Israelis. Lob all the mortars you want, but when we get fed up, we will clean house.

ThackerAgency on January 16, 2009 at 1:37 PM

Remember when this idiot’s wife was so outspoken against female genital mutilation, aka Female Circumcision? She was out there with some other celebrities beharing (behar-verb – to incessantly spew from one’s pie hole in a flagrantly offensive manner) about how awful it was (which it is), but the kicker is, all of a sudden they shut up. Maybe they realized that the Islamic Fundies might issue a fatwah against them, they didn’t want to risk their spoiled arses.

bloggless on January 16, 2009 at 1:37 PM

F U Forrest Gump.

The largely white, middle-class, suburban Mormons make easy targets for the left in America on this issue. But you’ll never see these leftists level the same attacks against, say, the Church of God in Christ (a largely black, charismatic denomination), or Missionary Baptists, or a variety of Protestant/Evangelical denominations, all of which have very large minority membership.

Pope Linus on January 16, 2009 at 1:37 PM

tneloms, my take is about the same as yours on this one. However, an impolitic way of phrasing the thought I think, and Hanks probably doesn’t help his cause by labeling folks as “un-American”.

dakine on January 16, 2009 at 1:38 PM

Presumably, then, it was wrong to require Utah to outlaw polygamy to gain admission into the Union? One man and one woman? Two men? Two women? Two women and one man? Doesn’t matter- right, Tom?

Wethal on January 16, 2009 at 1:36 PM

I prefer two goats and a chincilla.

HornetSting on January 16, 2009 at 1:38 PM

Cicero43 on January 16, 2009 at 1:36 PM

Brilliant

Hening on January 16, 2009 at 1:38 PM

Shut up and just act or direct.

RMCS_USN on January 16, 2009 at 1:38 PM

do not like to see any discrimination codified on any piece of paper,

So that provision in the US Constitution that only allows native-born Americans to be President….Come to this country with your parents at age two weeks, and you’re out of luck….?

Wethal on January 16, 2009 at 1:39 PM

See Tom Hanks movies is Un-American. Turnabout is fair play….

DL13 on January 16, 2009 at 1:39 PM

I’ll go ahead and say it…
Tom Hanks… you are un-American. I wasn’t fooled by your well-done WWII flicks. You will only honor our military in the context of being anti-war. You and Opie Cunningham have enjoyed a level of bi-partisian support because you keep your far-leftist ideas somewhat private. You’re no better than Micheal Moore or Sean Penn.

edgehead on January 16, 2009 at 1:39 PM

What can be more ” AMERICAN ” than people voting?

tx2654 on January 16, 2009 at 1:41 PM

Sorry America, was founded on “tolerance” not “acceptance”,
and the majority doesnt accept. Maybe, Tom, you could get a better deal under Sharia Law.

VTWaldrup on January 16, 2009 at 1:41 PM

People that want to prevent marriage from becoming another victim of the gay agenda are un-American…. please explain that to us Tom.

Maxx on January 16, 2009 at 1:41 PM

A little bit of light can be shed, and people can see who’s responsible, and that can motivate the next go around of our self correcting Constitution

Apprciate your unsolicited ridiculous “insight” Tommy boy. Spoken like a true Stalinist. I could repeat another poster by saying just shut up and act, but I’ve reached the point that I can’t bear the sight of these narrow minded ho’s in whorelywood another moment. That leaves me a short list of acceptable movies, etc. So be it.

Tommy, rot in hell with Stalin.

kooziegirl on January 16, 2009 at 1:41 PM

Remember when this idiot’s wife was so outspoken against female genital mutilation, aka Female Circumcision? She was out there with some other celebrities beharing (behar-verb – to incessantly spew from one’s pie hole in a flagrantly offensive manner) about how awful it was (which it is), but the kicker is, all of a sudden they shut up. Maybe they realized that the Islamic Fundies might issue a fatwah against them, they didn’t want to risk their spoiled arses.

bloggless on January 16, 2009 at 1:37 PM

I recall his wife and her group were also very critical of the Taliban…until Bush invaded Afghanistan. Couldn’t give him credit for helping improve, however modest so far, the educational status of girls in that country.

Wethal on January 16, 2009 at 1:41 PM

I would tell Hanks just the same way I’ve told other liberals when they go over the line, which is fairly often since they’ve really been allowed to get away with it.

That’s just a lie.

Speakup on January 16, 2009 at 1:42 PM

A little bit of light can be shed

To a liberal, anyone who disagrees with them just needs to be enlightened.

Wethal on January 16, 2009 at 1:42 PM

This is in bad taste but you guys are far from having the moral high ground on calling things un-american

crr6 on January 16, 2009 at 1:43 PM

Sorry America, was founded on “tolerance” not “acceptance”,
and the majority doesnt accept. Maybe, Tom, you could get a better deal under Sharia Law.

VTWaldrup on January 16, 2009 at 1:41 PM

I think Hollyweird needs a little sharia law. That’ll SHUT EM UP.

HornetSting on January 16, 2009 at 1:43 PM

Thomas Jefferson = ‘un-American’

“Whosoever shall be guilty of Rape, Polygamy, or Sodomy with man or woman shall be punished, if a man, by castration, if a woman, by cutting thro’ the cartilage of her nose a hole of one half inch diameter at the least.”

Thomas Jefferson, 1778

jp on January 16, 2009 at 1:43 PM

Attacking the Mormon Church as unAmerican.

I think Mr. Hanks has jumped the shark.

Marking Time on January 16, 2009 at 1:43 PM

Wethal on January 16, 2009 at 1:41 PM

Apparently, the only ones who are supposed to risk getting hurt are our men and women in the military. Hollywood elist pigs.

bloggless on January 16, 2009 at 1:44 PM

You are all going to be GAY or else

Kini on January 16, 2009 at 1:44 PM

Hey Hanks! Fuck you!

GarandFan on January 16, 2009 at 1:37 PM

Post at KOS… not here, if that’s the best you can do.

Maxx on January 16, 2009 at 1:44 PM

This is in bad taste but you guys are far from having the moral high ground on calling things un-american

crr6 on January 16, 2009 at 1:43 PM

Ah, the resident democrat speaks….
Staking out your port-a-potty for the inauguration of your messiah, 6?

HornetSting on January 16, 2009 at 1:44 PM

I am a supporter of same-sex marriage, but I have been disgusted by the response to the Prop 8 vote. It is one thing to protest, but it is quite another to harrass, intimidate, destroy, etc. Tom Hanks, Jerry Brown, the anti-prop 8 mobs, et al. are setting the cause back by years. They are destroying much of the goodwill and progress generated over the last ten years.

Consider, for example, the debate over abortion. Since the Supreme Court got involved in 1973, the fight has not ended. Had the Court left it to the States to decide, we might have reached some resolution already.

DCGamer on January 16, 2009 at 1:45 PM

I don’t disagree with Tom Hanks. I think Prop 8 is un-American. I have always thought that being equal before the law was a cornerstone of American political philosophy despite our history. Also, rights surviving the tyranny of the majority are also enshrined in our political thinking. I don’t think it was right for him to bash Mormons in making his case. They didn’t do anything wrong.

lexhamfox on January 16, 2009 at 1:46 PM

I thought dissent was patriotic.

Little Boomer on January 16, 2009 at 1:47 PM

No, he said un-Analican.

Big difference.

NoDonkey on January 16, 2009 at 1:48 PM

Well I guess now I have to cross off Tom Hanks movies now.
Too bad. I used to think he was a decent actor.
What a POS. Actors basically need to just STFU.Who cares what they think? I guess the Obama supporters do.

Well this ‘un-American’ Mormon thinks Mormons are some of the most Pro-American citizens you can find in this country.
I bet Hanks doesn’t actually know one Mormon.

Badger40 on January 16, 2009 at 1:50 PM

it gives you an idea of how important this issue is to the far-left Secular Humanist, that they go this far and against many of their own voters.

as I’ve said many times here, this stuff was basically predicted decades ago by Christian Theologians like Francis Schaeffer

jp on January 16, 2009 at 1:50 PM

I thought dissent was patriotic.

That went out the window when Great Leader was elected.

Dissent is verboten!

Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer!

All bow down.

NoDonkey on January 16, 2009 at 1:50 PM

You are all going to be GAY or else
Kini on January 16, 2009 at 1:44 PM

I’ll take the or else, I don’t care what it is.

Bishop on January 16, 2009 at 1:50 PM

According to Gov. Schwarzenegger California faces insolvency within weeks and has a budget gap which will top $40 billion over the current and next fiscal year. Does anyone wonder how one of the most prosperous states in the union got this way?

I don’t. There are to many people with way to much time on their hands and nothing important to do with their lives. They create causes and crisis and come up with ridiculous ideas to fix non existent problems. It’s alway easy to spend money you didn’t have to earn. And liberals have been asking for more and more.

When things are going well you don’t mind so much. But when things are tight, you look to cut your expenses. Government and Liberals don’t think that way. They feel they should never do with less.

Way off my point here. Bottom line is: Prop 8 should never have made it to the ballot. It’s premise was idiotic to begin with. But someone sued, the state had to spend money to defend. It cost money to put out a ballot initiate. Money that could have gone to other things was raised by both sides of the argument. What a wast of time and resources. Not only do libs want me to agree with them, they want me to pay them for that privilege.

Can’t wait until the big one, then Nevada and Arizona will be the left coast.

Tommy_G on January 16, 2009 at 1:50 PM

I thought dissent was patriotic.

Little Boomer on January 16, 2009 at 1:47 PM

Quite true. And it was on the eve of the Rev War. They called themselves Patriots.

Badger40 on January 16, 2009 at 1:50 PM

So, is Mr. Hanks in favor of the polygamy his series portrays? If not, why not, given that it is also a personal choice of the type he thinks everyone should be able to make?

I think Hanks doesn’t understand the subject matter of his series at all. Even I, a Catholic, can see that the Mormons Hanks’ series deals with are not members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints — they are the equivalent of those Catholics who split from the Church as a result of Vatican II — some splitting for no reason other than that the Tridentine Mass would no longer be offered. They are a splinter sect whose relationship with their mainstream denomination is dubious at best.

Dragging that stuff, out of the blue, into his argument certainly illuminates the thought processes (or lack thereof) going through Mr. Hank’s mind.

I voted for Prop 8 because I didn’t want any further erosion of my private right to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation — a right guaranteed me by the Constitution of the United States of America, but which could be taken away from me in a moment by my State. As we’ve seen in the past, the slippery slope begins when a private right becomes a public right, as happened with abortion — suddenly, anyone who disagrees with that “right” — even a medical provider such as a nurse or pharmacist — is doing illegal things if they refuse to participate. I just felt that a preemptive strike was on order here to prevent the same thing happening; I can see, in a voucher situation, where the State could deny the validity of educational vouchers used for religious schools where the religion denounces homosexuality.

unclesmrgol on January 16, 2009 at 1:51 PM

Good post DCGamer. Tough issue, but I finally came down against “gay marriage” per se. Civil unions with all of the inherent legal rights and privileges of marriage, but I think marriage is an foundationally a heterosexual institution. I come to this conclusion not for religious reasons, but rather cultural and practical ones. IMHO, it is not “un-American” or bigoted (although, I’m sure many who supported Prop 8 are in fact bigots when it comes to homosexuality) to have actively supported Prop 8.

dakine on January 16, 2009 at 1:52 PM

Tom,

Say that to my face. Libtards run around yelling, “don’t attack my patriotism!” But its ok for them to do it when it suits them.

Hanks, you’re a low life.

Dog

dogsoldier on January 16, 2009 at 1:52 PM

slippery slope, and nambla is waiting in the wings to promote their cause after all this gets settled.

VTWaldrup on January 16, 2009 at 1:53 PM

Obarfa is against gay marriage, therefore he is un-American.

Start the impeachment proceedings.

Bishop on January 16, 2009 at 1:53 PM

The scary thing is that one day Tom Hanks will be POTUS.

worlok on January 16, 2009 at 1:54 PM

C’mon, AP…can we pleeeeeeze change the headline to “Tom Hanks: Majority of Californians are ‘un-American’”???

Snowed In on January 16, 2009 at 1:55 PM

The scary thing is that one day Tom Hanks will be POTUS.
worlok on January 16, 2009 at 1:54 PM

Too white.

Spike Lee, maybe.

Bishop on January 16, 2009 at 1:55 PM

The scary thing is that one day Tom Hanks will be POTUS.

worlok on January 16, 2009 at 1:54 PM

Maybe when Mexico finishes taking over Calimexico…

HornetSting on January 16, 2009 at 1:55 PM

Tom Hanks. Epic Fail.

Tacitus on January 16, 2009 at 1:56 PM

The scary thing is that one day Tom Hanks will be POTUS.
worlok on January 16, 2009 at 1:54 PM

Too white.

Gay President’s the next frontier.

If he’s not, is he willing to try?

NoDonkey on January 16, 2009 at 1:56 PM

Oh, BTW, Scolari outshone Hanks on Bosom Buddies. Watch it with fresh eyes if you don’t believe me.

Snowed In on January 16, 2009 at 1:57 PM

Tom Hanks made more sense when he was talking to the volleyball or Hootch the dog.

kingsjester on January 16, 2009 at 1:57 PM

Screw Hanks and the rest of that Hollywood trash.

rplat on January 16, 2009 at 1:58 PM

Query NoDonkey, would you vote for gay candidate?

dakine on January 16, 2009 at 1:59 PM

Isn’t “The Truth” also that Big Love is a fictional television show? What does it have to do with Mormons supporting Prop 8?

MayBee on January 16, 2009 at 2:02 PM

The boss wonders when, precisely, it became “progressive” again to level this charge against one’s opponents.

Good question. Paging Michele Bachmann…

CP on January 16, 2009 at 2:03 PM

It’s all right to “out” those with whom the libs disagree while defending their own right to privacy.

Referring to Gawker Stalker’s use of Google maps, Stan Rosenfield, who handles George Clooney and Kelly Ripa, says the maps are “a bad idea.”

“It’s conceptually bad because it provides information to people that they don’t need to have,” he says. “There’s a reasonable expectation of privacy that anyone has — you, me or someone who makes $200 billion. This is why people have unlisted phone numbers.”

Unless of course they happen to be a bunch of right wing religious gay-haters.

pain train on January 16, 2009 at 2:04 PM

Query NoDonkey, would you vote for gay candidate?

If you’re talking about a merry and jolly politician, of course!

I get jokes.

NoDonkey on January 16, 2009 at 2:04 PM

If Mr. Hanks would please explain just what purpose semen has in the alimentary channel I will review my opinion. Homosexuality is choice. No one forces anyone to commit homosexual acts anymore than pediphiles are forced to rape children. I have a tendency to be attracted to blond women, however I do not have the right to marry one. Marriage is not a civil right it is a priviledge licensed by the state. The people of said state decide what the requirement must be met before a license to marry will be issued. Since sodomy serves no natural purpose, it can be prohibitited

Zelsdorf Ragshaft on January 16, 2009 at 2:08 PM

Tom Hanks made more sense when he was talking to the volleyball or Hootch the dog.

kingsjester on January 16, 2009 at 1:57 PM

Didn’t he wind up marrying that volleyball in real life?

Hening on January 16, 2009 at 2:09 PM

How far, in his immaculate American-ness, would Hanks be willing to go to make sure “people can see who’s responsible”? This far?

Aside from the lack of government involvement, how is this any different from the horror of horrors of the black listing years ago?

It is in fact *very* American to voice your opinion in a debate over issues.

tneloms on January 16, 2009 at 1:32 PM

That’s what Prop 8 supporters were doing.

Targeting Mormons and random old ladies, calling people un-American, and using judges and lawyers to overturn a constitutional amendment is NOT the way to win anyone over. It’s a form of bullying, and seems to be the modus operandi of the left these days.

Doughboy on January 16, 2009 at 1:37 PM

It’s certainly not. It will only do the opposite and convince the Prop 8 supporters that they were correct in believing they’d be persecuted for their beliefs.

This is in bad taste but you guys are far from having the moral high ground on calling things un-american

crr6 on January 16, 2009 at 1:43 PM

Painting with a broad brush is usually a bad thing. Not all of us have dropped the un-American insult with frequency, and as has already been shown, the Left isn’t clean on this issue either.

So with no moral ground on either side, it’s really hard to care.

Esthier on January 16, 2009 at 2:10 PM

I have no idea what meandering pathway Hanks’ mind wandered down to arrive at his conclusion, but I coincidentally stand by him.

We just witnessed a democratic rape of human dignity…but please, kiss your bibles and pat each other on the back.

LimeyGeek on January 16, 2009 at 2:11 PM

So with no moral ground on either side, it’s really hard to care.

Esthier on January 16, 2009 at 2:10 PM

Lots here seem to.

crr6 on January 16, 2009 at 2:13 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 ... 6


You must be logged in to post a comment.