<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Was the Minnesota Recount unconstitutional?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/15/was-the-minnesota-recount-unconstitutional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/15/was-the-minnesota-recount-unconstitutional/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:03:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franken loses in court, full contest to be heard - Southern Maryland Community Forums</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/15/was-the-minnesota-recount-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-1808225</link>
		<dc:creator>Franken loses in court, full contest to be heard - Southern Maryland Community Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40673#comment-1808225</guid>
		<description>[...] lack of uniform standards on absentee ballot reviews, Coleman does have a case for a contest, and some would argue that the Canvassing Board</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lack of uniform standards on absentee ballot reviews, Coleman does have a case for a contest, and some would argue that the Canvassing Board</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Franken loses in court, full contest to be heard</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/15/was-the-minnesota-recount-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-1807268</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Franken loses in court, full contest to be heard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40673#comment-1807268</guid>
		<description>[...] lack of uniform standards on absentee ballot reviews, Coleman does have a case for a contest, and some would argue that the Canvassing Board&#8217;s actions amounted to an unconstitutional violation of the Equal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lack of uniform standards on absentee ballot reviews, Coleman does have a case for a contest, and some would argue that the Canvassing Board&#8217;s actions amounted to an unconstitutional violation of the Equal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apacalyps</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/15/was-the-minnesota-recount-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-1787759</link>
		<dc:creator>apacalyps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40673#comment-1787759</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The remedy?  A do-over. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The remedy?  A do-over. </p></blockquote>
<p>Yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JackOfClubs</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/15/was-the-minnesota-recount-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-1787244</link>
		<dc:creator>JackOfClubs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40673#comment-1787244</guid>
		<description>The problem in Florida was that they tried to change the rules in mid-stream after people had already voted.  In the Minesota case it seems that they already had crazy rules and everyone tried to follow them but with inconsistent results.  I&#039;m not sure the two cases are comparable, but I admit to not following the details in this story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem in Florida was that they tried to change the rules in mid-stream after people had already voted.  In the Minesota case it seems that they already had crazy rules and everyone tried to follow them but with inconsistent results.  I&#8217;m not sure the two cases are comparable, but I admit to not following the details in this story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winebabe</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/15/was-the-minnesota-recount-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-1786698</link>
		<dc:creator>Winebabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40673#comment-1786698</guid>
		<description>This is a disgrace.  Franken is a liar and a cheat.  The election should be done over and monitored closely by both parties to ensure no cheating or voter fraud.

That is the only solution.  Of course in a FAIR election we know who would win and it ain&#039;t the assclown from SNL!!@!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a disgrace.  Franken is a liar and a cheat.  The election should be done over and monitored closely by both parties to ensure no cheating or voter fraud.</p>
<p>That is the only solution.  Of course in a FAIR election we know who would win and it ain&#8217;t the assclown from SNL!!@!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LimeyGeek</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/15/was-the-minnesota-recount-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-1786296</link>
		<dc:creator>LimeyGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40673#comment-1786296</guid>
		<description>And to think how much ridicule was heaped upon Florida voters in 2000.....Minnesota is about to become the &#039;Belgium&#039; of the USA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And to think how much ridicule was heaped upon Florida voters in 2000&#8230;..Minnesota is about to become the &#8216;Belgium&#8217; of the USA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keemo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/15/was-the-minnesota-recount-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-1785661</link>
		<dc:creator>Keemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40673#comment-1785661</guid>
		<description>To the dude who is tired of hearing about this...

The American election system has been compromised by thugs and cheats, and you&#039;re sick of hearing about this.

What has happened to American exceptionalism?
What has happened to accountability with Americans?
What has happened to human integrity with Americans?
What has happened to the old idea of winning over your fellow people by way of ideas and solutions?

Screw Frankin and his band of thugs and cheats! I hope we keep hearing about this until some accountability appears!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the dude who is tired of hearing about this&#8230;</p>
<p>The American election system has been compromised by thugs and cheats, and you&#8217;re sick of hearing about this.</p>
<p>What has happened to American exceptionalism?<br />
What has happened to accountability with Americans?<br />
What has happened to human integrity with Americans?<br />
What has happened to the old idea of winning over your fellow people by way of ideas and solutions?</p>
<p>Screw Frankin and his band of thugs and cheats! I hope we keep hearing about this until some accountability appears!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff_from_mpls</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/15/was-the-minnesota-recount-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-1785640</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff_from_mpls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40673#comment-1785640</guid>
		<description>There is another angle, you know.

Has anyone actually &lt;em&gt;seen&lt;/em&gt; Franken&#039;s birth certificate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is another angle, you know.</p>
<p>Has anyone actually <em>seen</em> Franken&#8217;s birth certificate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davod</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/15/was-the-minnesota-recount-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-1785619</link>
		<dc:creator>davod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40673#comment-1785619</guid>
		<description>mistakes ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mistakes ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freddy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/15/was-the-minnesota-recount-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-1785510</link>
		<dc:creator>Freddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40673#comment-1785510</guid>
		<description>I think this is fairly simple to resolve.

The court will in fact determine that the recount is invalid due to the various reasons mentioned most everywhere.  This will leave the initial machine count as the only legitimate one.

The canvasing board/secretary of state in Minnesota will then have to determine if it is possible to conduct a legitimate recount.  If they determine they need to try to count them again, then they will.  If they determine that the integrity of the ballots has been compromised, which is what is indicated by the various descrepencies in the hand count, then the initial machine count will stand.

Now me, I find it funny that after all the years of machine counts, there are so many people that dont remember just how bad hand counting actually is!  In fact, it was because of all of the terrible mistakes made in hand counting that we went to machine counting in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is fairly simple to resolve.</p>
<p>The court will in fact determine that the recount is invalid due to the various reasons mentioned most everywhere.  This will leave the initial machine count as the only legitimate one.</p>
<p>The canvasing board/secretary of state in Minnesota will then have to determine if it is possible to conduct a legitimate recount.  If they determine they need to try to count them again, then they will.  If they determine that the integrity of the ballots has been compromised, which is what is indicated by the various descrepencies in the hand count, then the initial machine count will stand.</p>
<p>Now me, I find it funny that after all the years of machine counts, there are so many people that dont remember just how bad hand counting actually is!  In fact, it was because of all of the terrible mistakes made in hand counting that we went to machine counting in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday Round-up: 01-16-09 &#171; Grand Rants</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/15/was-the-minnesota-recount-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-1785312</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Round-up: 01-16-09 &#171; Grand Rants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40673#comment-1785312</guid>
		<description>[...] Over! It seems likely that the only way Minnesotans will get a fair count out of their Senate contest is to start from scratch. Given the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Over! It seems likely that the only way Minnesotans will get a fair count out of their Senate contest is to start from scratch. Given the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigWyo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/15/was-the-minnesota-recount-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-1785235</link>
		<dc:creator>BigWyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 03:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40673#comment-1785235</guid>
		<description>Please...please..please...let there be a run off.  

Fragile Little Snowflake Franken has had a glimpse of victory.  At one point in time, his pea brain registered the fact that yes, he could be a United States Senator!!

To see him get completely and utterly crushed in a run off with the whole country watching would be almost as good as busting him a good one right in the chops.

Almost...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please&#8230;please..please&#8230;let there be a run off.  </p>
<p>Fragile Little Snowflake Franken has had a glimpse of victory.  At one point in time, his pea brain registered the fact that yes, he could be a United States Senator!!</p>
<p>To see him get completely and utterly crushed in a run off with the whole country watching would be almost as good as busting him a good one right in the chops.</p>
<p>Almost&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 18-1</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/15/was-the-minnesota-recount-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-1785077</link>
		<dc:creator>18-1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 02:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40673#comment-1785077</guid>
		<description>We need to indeed the fiascos that are recounts.

Who believes that telling a bunch of partisans the exact (and small) number of votes they need to produce to get their candidate elected is a more accurate way to count the votes then election night?

Count the votes and finalize the tally and that should be it.

We&#039;ve seen this happen in three high profile elections now and the whole one that didn&#039;t turn into a *complete* fiasco is the one that was stopped in the middle of the theft, err, process - Bush v Gore in Florida...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need to indeed the fiascos that are recounts.</p>
<p>Who believes that telling a bunch of partisans the exact (and small) number of votes they need to produce to get their candidate elected is a more accurate way to count the votes then election night?</p>
<p>Count the votes and finalize the tally and that should be it.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve seen this happen in three high profile elections now and the whole one that didn&#8217;t turn into a *complete* fiasco is the one that was stopped in the middle of the theft, err, process &#8211; Bush v Gore in Florida&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buckaroo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/15/was-the-minnesota-recount-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-1785069</link>
		<dc:creator>Buckaroo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 02:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40673#comment-1785069</guid>
		<description>gee, woulda been nice to have such a remedy TWO MONTHS AGO!

/sorry ed, i&#039;m still dissing mn until they clean up this mess ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gee, woulda been nice to have such a remedy TWO MONTHS AGO!</p>
<p>/sorry ed, i&#8217;m still dissing mn until they clean up this mess &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcila</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/15/was-the-minnesota-recount-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-1784947</link>
		<dc:creator>jcila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 02:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40673#comment-1784947</guid>
		<description>Hey since when did they hire our secretary of voter registration..

heck here we even had the dead voting not once but twice..
so i thought this could never happen again..

nope you hired him morons..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey since when did they hire our secretary of voter registration..</p>
<p>heck here we even had the dead voting not once but twice..<br />
so i thought this could never happen again..</p>
<p>nope you hired him morons..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: burt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/15/was-the-minnesota-recount-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-1784822</link>
		<dc:creator>burt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 01:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40673#comment-1784822</guid>
		<description>Wait a minute.  This election is super legal compared with Johnson&#039;s first senate win in Texas as well as many in Illinois including Kennedy /Johnson win in sixty.  Some cheating has always been allowed.  What happened to equal protection in the Constitution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a minute.  This election is super legal compared with Johnson&#8217;s first senate win in Texas as well as many in Illinois including Kennedy /Johnson win in sixty.  Some cheating has always been allowed.  What happened to equal protection in the Constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigWyo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/15/was-the-minnesota-recount-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-1784764</link>
		<dc:creator>BigWyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 01:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40673#comment-1784764</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Since you guys elected a wrestler as governor, I think that set the precedent. A caged death-match.

connertown on January 15, 2009 at 6:38 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;d like to think Norm would kick a lung out of FrankenSpaz, but Norm kinda comes off as not real tough.

But I do think Norm would have the wontons to show up for battle.  Franken...not so much.

&lt;strong&gt;DO IT OVER!!!!&lt;/strong&gt;

Franken will be all against a run off.  He knows he&#039;ll get beat...badly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Since you guys elected a wrestler as governor, I think that set the precedent. A caged death-match.</p>
<p>connertown on January 15, 2009 at 6:38 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;d like to think Norm would kick a lung out of FrankenSpaz, but Norm kinda comes off as not real tough.</p>
<p>But I do think Norm would have the wontons to show up for battle.  Franken&#8230;not so much.</p>
<p><strong>DO IT OVER!!!!</strong></p>
<p>Franken will be all against a run off.  He knows he&#8217;ll get beat&#8230;badly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VekTor</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/15/was-the-minnesota-recount-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-1784718</link>
		<dc:creator>VekTor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 01:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40673#comment-1784718</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Does Minnesota really need two Senators? Or, more to the point, does Minnesota deserve two Senators?

Since you guys elected a wrestler as governor, I think that set the precedent. A caged death-match.

connertown on January 15, 2009 at 6:38 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;THUNDERDOME!&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;em&gt;Two candidates enter, one candidate leaves!&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Does Minnesota really need two Senators? Or, more to the point, does Minnesota deserve two Senators?</p>
<p>Since you guys elected a wrestler as governor, I think that set the precedent. A caged death-match.</p>
<p>connertown on January 15, 2009 at 6:38 PM</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>THUNDERDOME!</strong></p>
<p><em>Two candidates enter, one candidate leaves!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: highhopes</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/15/was-the-minnesota-recount-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-1784651</link>
		<dc:creator>highhopes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 01:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40673#comment-1784651</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Fuck the politicians, the citizens should DEMAND a new election between Coleman and Franken. This puts the final decision where it belongs, WITH THE PEOPLE.

GarandFan on January 15, 2009 at 7:48 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree and I don&#039;t.

I agree that if the election was so botched by procedure and mismanagement it needs a new election.  But what does it mean to those other offices on the same tickets?  Are there close elections out there that are effected by these ballots that are included or not?

In a statewide vote (like US Senator) how do you re-vote without putting the results for all the other races in question where the voting was close?  It&#039;s a legitmate question.  Keep in mind those included and excluded votes only concerned themselves with the Senate race.  How many of them have the potential of changing other &quot;certified&quot; outcomes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Fuck the politicians, the citizens should DEMAND a new election between Coleman and Franken. This puts the final decision where it belongs, WITH THE PEOPLE.</p>
<p>GarandFan on January 15, 2009 at 7:48 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree and I don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I agree that if the election was so botched by procedure and mismanagement it needs a new election.  But what does it mean to those other offices on the same tickets?  Are there close elections out there that are effected by these ballots that are included or not?</p>
<p>In a statewide vote (like US Senator) how do you re-vote without putting the results for all the other races in question where the voting was close?  It&#8217;s a legitmate question.  Keep in mind those included and excluded votes only concerned themselves with the Senate race.  How many of them have the potential of changing other &#8220;certified&#8221; outcomes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Y-not</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/15/was-the-minnesota-recount-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-1784642</link>
		<dc:creator>Y-not</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40673#comment-1784642</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;will the vote for lizard man survive a supreme court review.

rob verdi on January 15, 2009 at 5:07 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I believe so.  He&#039;s being sworn in next week.

Oh... did you mean some &lt;em&gt;other&lt;/em&gt; reptile?  

/sarc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>will the vote for lizard man survive a supreme court review.</p>
<p>rob verdi on January 15, 2009 at 5:07 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I believe so.  He&#8217;s being sworn in next week.</p>
<p>Oh&#8230; did you mean some <em>other</em> reptile?  </p>
<p>/sarc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GarandFan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/15/was-the-minnesota-recount-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-1784599</link>
		<dc:creator>GarandFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40673#comment-1784599</guid>
		<description>Fuck the politicians, the citizens should DEMAND a new election between Coleman and Franken.  This puts the final decision where it belongs, WITH THE PEOPLE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuck the politicians, the citizens should DEMAND a new election between Coleman and Franken.  This puts the final decision where it belongs, WITH THE PEOPLE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profitsbeard</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/15/was-the-minnesota-recount-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-1784528</link>
		<dc:creator>profitsbeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40673#comment-1784528</guid>
		<description>Franken should never have franking privileges.

REDO!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Franken should never have franking privileges.</p>
<p>REDO!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: droofus</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/15/was-the-minnesota-recount-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-1784517</link>
		<dc:creator>droofus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40673#comment-1784517</guid>
		<description>The logical thing would seem to be to have a do-over where only those who voted in Nov 2008 can vote in the do-over.   Being the logical solution, means it won&#039;t happen.  

A do-over with that allows all comers to vote would end up an ACORN fiasco with newly registered folks coming in from everywhere to vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The logical thing would seem to be to have a do-over where only those who voted in Nov 2008 can vote in the do-over.   Being the logical solution, means it won&#8217;t happen.  </p>
<p>A do-over with that allows all comers to vote would end up an ACORN fiasco with newly registered folks coming in from everywhere to vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan Klaus</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/15/was-the-minnesota-recount-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-1784469</link>
		<dc:creator>Johan Klaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40673#comment-1784469</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But wait, I’m sure that legal scholar, Harry Reid, will soon weigh in and try to seat the Democrat, because you know, that all that is important now days.

Romeo13 on January 15, 2009 at 5:05 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
 Legal scholar Joe Biden will instruct everyone about how Franklin D. Roosevelt gave a television address after the stock market crash of 1929 and solved the dilemma of a contested senatoral election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But wait, I’m sure that legal scholar, Harry Reid, will soon weigh in and try to seat the Democrat, because you know, that all that is important now days.</p>
<p>Romeo13 on January 15, 2009 at 5:05 PM</p></blockquote>
<p> Legal scholar Joe Biden will instruct everyone about how Franklin D. Roosevelt gave a television address after the stock market crash of 1929 and solved the dilemma of a contested senatoral election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: highhopes</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/15/was-the-minnesota-recount-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-1784450</link>
		<dc:creator>highhopes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40673#comment-1784450</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Does Minnesota really need two Senators? Or, more to the point, does Minnesota deserve two Senators?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Question 1:  Yes per the Constitution.

Question 2:  Iffy at best.  Outside of California, MN is the most likely state to elect freaks and extremists.  They shame that whole Midwest values things by their selections.  Coleman is no prize but he should have won in a walk over something like Franken.  If it is this close, the state deserves the freak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Does Minnesota really need two Senators? Or, more to the point, does Minnesota deserve two Senators?</p></blockquote>
<p>Question 1:  Yes per the Constitution.</p>
<p>Question 2:  Iffy at best.  Outside of California, MN is the most likely state to elect freaks and extremists.  They shame that whole Midwest values things by their selections.  Coleman is no prize but he should have won in a walk over something like Franken.  If it is this close, the state deserves the freak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
