Palin not invited to Obama dinner for McCain?
posted at 3:05 pm on January 15, 2009 by Allahpundit
Her spokesman claims he doesn’t know if she was or not, but come on.
Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, his controversial running-mate, will not attend the dinner, Bill McAllister, a Palin spokesman tells Mother Jones…
Was she even invited? “I don’t know if she was invited,” McCallister says. Don’t know? How could that be? It’s hard to miss an invitation from a presidential inauguration committee. For its part, Obama’s inaugural committee has declined to say whether an invitation was sent to Palin. Repeated phone calls to its press office produced no answer to this simple question…
If Palin was left off the guest list, it’s not clear whether the snub came from McCain or the Presidential Inaugural Committee.
Isn’t it? I’m tempted to poll that question but we all know how it would go. Speaking of which, Rick Santorum chimes in this morning on why The One is bending over backwards to honor McCain: Because he knows a dependable maverick when he sees one.
In McCain’s mind, however, losing the presidency will not be the final chapter of his life story. He knows the path to “Big Media” redemption. Working with the man who vanquished him in November will show them all the real McCain again.
Remember, it was this onetime prisoner of war who led the charge to open diplomatic relations with Vietnam. If that past is prologue, and McCain’s legislative record is any guide, he will not just join with Obama but lead the charge in Congress on global warming, immigration “reform,” the closing of Guantanamo, federal funding for embryonic-stem-cell research, and importation of prescription drugs.
But McCain won’t stop there in his effort to rehabilitate himself in the media’s – or maybe his own – eyes. He will forge common ground on a long list of initiatives that go far beyond where he has gone before, including the stimulus package.
So obviously true is this that I’m not going to bother polling it, either. Instead, let’s approach the question this way: Are there any major policy initiatives on which McCain will break sharply with Obama? You’re all going to say Iraq but you’re kidding yourselves. For one thing, they’re already working hard to assimilate Maverick’s chief crony on that, and for another, he and Obama have always been more in sync on this subject than most of us would like to admit. In fact, if The One does try to speed up his withdrawal plans, the first person he’ll call to ask for cover on that is McCain. McCain might not give it to him, but the gesture at least will prevent him from leading some sort of GOP insurrection.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 … 6 Next »
Who, McCain?
FloatingRock on January 15, 2009 at 3:44 PM
Holy crapman, turn on the news. Plane in the Hudson!
HornetSting on January 15, 2009 at 3:44 PM
Actually, I’m talking about a number of the worse ones, along with the wishes that others have rotten lives, die, etc. Sadly, I don’t bookmark all your posts for quick reference.
MadisonConservative on January 15, 2009 at 3:44 PM
Pet names. Yes.
HornetSting on January 15, 2009 at 3:44 PM
Thank you, tickleddragon.
HornetSting on January 15, 2009 at 3:45 PM
Drywall! What you wrote is true, except I’m not sure that you realize that Sarah Palin is the only thing that kept McCain’s campaign from resulting in complete and utter humiliation — of him. It’s the last thing he wants to be reminded of.
BigD on January 15, 2009 at 3:28 PM
————
Whether she kept him from losing worse or kept him from winning, McCain doesn’t want to touch her with a 10 foot pole.
Dave Rywall on January 15, 2009 at 3:45 PM
Happy birthday, dude! Have a swing at the pinata named wise_man!
MadisonConservative on January 15, 2009 at 3:46 PM
Ditto. Where can I send a check to support McCain’s opponent in his next election?
BuckeyeSam on January 15, 2009 at 3:46 PM
Like we said, Drywall. McCain already had a girlfriend.
HornetSting on January 15, 2009 at 3:46 PM
To ‘crater’ is to fail. Epic fail. I hope that clears up your misunderstanding.
LimeyGeek on January 15, 2009 at 3:46 PM
I’m a dudette, but thank you. What’s inside THAT pinata, Madison?
HornetSting on January 15, 2009 at 3:47 PM
Yes, we’re aware conservatives are repugnant to him, and liberals are ambrosia.
MadisonConservative on January 15, 2009 at 3:48 PM
Barry’s meeting list: Harry and Nan…check, Beltway “Conservative” Columnists with Moderates…check,
“Liberal” Columnists (Maddow Included)…check, Maverick…
check, Next: Achmedinejad
Everybody sing: “Lookin’ for love in all the wrong places…”
kingsjester on January 15, 2009 at 3:48 PM
Air Force Obama? Could we get that lucky?
LimeyGeek on January 15, 2009 at 3:48 PM
Crash and Burn. I only went to the local Republican office after Palin came aboard. The crows around the fence that joined me did the same. McCain had no love. No love.
HornetSting on January 15, 2009 at 3:48 PM
Well, he’s full of something, but it’s not pleasant.
MadisonConservative on January 15, 2009 at 3:48 PM
Obama is holding the dinner; it would be Obama’s call whether to send the invitation. An invitation probably wasn’t because Sarah Palin is not part of the Washington D.C. scene. For the same reason, Obama met with Washington D.C. “conservatives,” but not Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity.
As for Rick Santorum’s article, all Santorum has done is to give a forum to McCain haters at a time when the GOP needs to focus on getting its act together. I happen to believe that requires a definitive conservative direction, but I also believe that McCain bashing is counter-productive. The McCain-Palin ticket ran on a solid platform; in foreign affairs, military matters and national security, McCain’s knowledge and experience cannot be questioned. This, however, was a tough year for the GOP; McCain was the only Republican that the polls showed who had a chance of winning the Presidency; all other alternatives had far worse poll numbers. Unfortunately, there were “headwinds” that precluded any Republican, even McCain, from being elected President — a financial meltdown that created economic anxieties that have historically favored the Democrats and did this year; a Bush Administration financial bailout that muddied the waters of what was a Reaganesque economic message delivered by McCain and Palin on the campaign trail; the unpopularity of President Bush, which is unfair but which is the result of unceasing attack by the Left and President Bush not using the bully pulpit to defend his Administration; money and more money, some of it illegal, that Obama had; and media bias that was absurdly in the tank for Obama and that operated effectively day-in, day-out as a propaganda machine for Democrats. The “tailwinds” that should work for the GOP of strong military and national security, strong values and strong economy based on freedom and opportunity did not blow for the GOP this year because of the unusual economic situation that arose. Before the financial meltdown, McCain was ahead in the polls; after the meltdown, the economic anxieties, the Obama money and the media bias trumped all.
At this point, we need to focus on the future; as for McCain, let’s wait and see what John McCain actually does before attacking him. He can go in a number of different directions, some unwise and some wise. What is far, far more important for Republicans to do at this point is to develop ideologically sound positions for the issues ahead of us — reload intellectually so to speak. Socialism and socialist-like liberal domestic programs do not work, and so-called soft power (better called appeasement diplomacy) is a recipe for disaster in foreign affairs. Again, it is on the issues that we Republicans need to focus.
Phil Byler on January 15, 2009 at 3:48 PM
Thanks for the clarification. I was picturing you meant that Obama would’ve been in the hole created by the meteor. As a “crater” is defined, in non-slang, as a whole left by a meteor. :)
tickleddragon on January 15, 2009 at 3:49 PM
No. Besides, can’t the messiah fly?
HornetSting on January 15, 2009 at 3:49 PM
Hmmm A.F.O. need to find an R somewhere. ;)
upinak on January 15, 2009 at 3:49 PM
I wonder if McCain has already been fitted for his kneepads or if that will happen at the dinner.
bullseye on January 15, 2009 at 3:49 PM
Darn.
LimeyGeek on January 15, 2009 at 3:49 PM
Ten four.
HornetSting on January 15, 2009 at 3:49 PM
and neither does Grahamnesty …
but for other reasons
joey24007 on January 15, 2009 at 3:49 PM
Can’t we all just get along? Even with you, dryrot.
Bishop on January 15, 2009 at 3:50 PM
Arizona. Find A REAL conservative and we will send MONEY by the bucketload against maverick.
HornetSting on January 15, 2009 at 3:51 PM
Hey Phil, life’s too short and the thread moves too quickly. Can you give me the cliff’s notes version? :)
JK. I keeeed. *mwah*
tickleddragon on January 15, 2009 at 3:51 PM
I think he bought his own….February 6, 2008
HornetSting on January 15, 2009 at 3:52 PM
For the answer to that, check out the link in my comment at the top of the page and notice what the guy says when he gets out of the car.
FloatingRock on January 15, 2009 at 3:52 PM
Air Force Obama? Could we get that lucky?
LimeyGeek on January 15, 2009
Air Force The One.
artist on January 15, 2009 at 3:52 PM
The plane is a U.S. Airways Commuter plane going from N.Y.C. to Charlotte, N.C.. Boats are evacuating passengers as quickly as possible. !46 passengers on board, 5 crew members.
kingsjester on January 15, 2009 at 3:52 PM
We need to FOCUS ON REMOVING THE RINOS OUT OF OUR PARTY! If this means giving maverick the finger. So be it.
HornetSting on January 15, 2009 at 3:53 PM
wise_man on January 15, 2009 at 3:53 PM
Like we said, Drywall. McCain already had a girlfriend.
HornetSting on January 15, 2009 at 3:46 PM
Yup.
Cody1991 on January 15, 2009 at 3:54 PM
The plane is a U.S. Airways Commuter plane going from N.Y.C. to Charlotte, N.C.. Boats are evacuating passengers as quickly as possible. !46 passengers on board, 5 crew members.
kingsjester on January 15, 2009 at 3:52 PM
Now we know Obarfa wasn’t on board, he doesn’t like to travel with common folk.
Bishop on January 15, 2009 at 3:55 PM
google search. took less than 30 seconds each.
wise_man on January 15, 2009 at 3:55 PM
Could your provide some sort of non-anecdotal evidence of this? Polls? Anything?
crr6 on January 15, 2009 at 3:56 PM
Such a gleeful post! Palin in a bad light, author all giddy. Some things never change.
redrock on January 15, 2009 at 3:56 PM
Dumping on McCain is part of that process. He’s a big part of the very problem which has left the Republican Party in need of getting its act together.
FloatingRock on January 15, 2009 at 3:56 PM
Respect my authoritah!
HornetSting on January 15, 2009 at 3:57 PM
These are PR stunts; McCain is a loser. He’s going to keep screwing us hard…Palin is the future.
blue13326 on January 15, 2009 at 3:57 PM
Look at the amount of cash that poured into the maverick’s coffers after he named the Cuda was named vice president.
Money talks.
HornetSting on January 15, 2009 at 3:58 PM
Off the top of my head, the first 2 data points are A. the unexpected million$ that flowed into the McCain campaign immediately upon announcing her as VP candidate, and B. Saxby Chambliss’ election victory and his comments about her valuable assistance in his win.
cs89 on January 15, 2009 at 3:58 PM
Santorum has McCain’s number in that subtle assessment.
The GOP members of the Senate would be wise to distance themselves from any initiatives of bipartisanship that McCain sponsors. He has turned his back on conservatives and the party that he claims to be part of.
onlineanalyst on January 15, 2009 at 3:58 PM
Okay, started celebrating early….after he named cuda to the vp slot….
HornetSting on January 15, 2009 at 3:59 PM
A reader writes:
http://www.conservatives4palin.com/2009/01/obamamccain-snub-cuda.html
joey24007 on January 15, 2009 at 3:59 PM
Look folks: On whose behalf is the Presidential Inaugural Committee organized? Obama. Who would be in charge of issuing invitations to anybody? Obama’s people. Who is supposedly the main focus of the dinner? McCain. Was McCain, his wife or a McCain staffer consulted by the committee to whom should be invited? Not sure. So let’s not condemn McCain until we know more. Instead, let’s reserve judgment. However if this is allowed to stand I will admit this snub is not inadvertent but deliberate and the blame should be placed at the feet of Obama without any further evidence to the contrary. Sarah is an anathema to Obama. She is the only thing now standing in Obama’s way from being re-elected in 2012.
technopeasant on January 15, 2009 at 3:59 PM
Like this?
Wanna keep going?
MadisonConservative on January 15, 2009 at 4:00 PM
Nah, he’d just walk to land…
Romeo13 on January 15, 2009 at 4:00 PM
t I’m not sure that you realize that Sarah Palin is the only thing that kept McCain’s campaign from resulting in complete and utter humiliation — of him.
Could your provide some sort of non-anecdotal evidence of this? Polls? Anything?
crr6 on January 15, 2009 at 3:56 PM
How can you be ignorant of what truth is? The fact is that now that McCain is acting like the Rino we all knew him to be….and count me as one of those plugging her nose to vote for her pre-Palin, he is of no point.
Rino’s such as your self are pointless to the BOP and if they keep pandering to you, instead of giving REAL conservatism a chance, they will deserve their quick demise as a party.
Noelie on January 15, 2009 at 4:00 PM
Ahhh.
*Wipes tears from eyes*
HornetSting on January 15, 2009 at 4:00 PM
LMAO!
HornetSting on January 15, 2009 at 4:01 PM
hmm. now madison conservative is quite. must be googling my username looking for times Iused ‘bad words’. nevermind the fact that the response to him was to answer his claims that he doesn’t use ‘bad words’ like I do.
But then again, that point along with many others will go over his head as he proudly displays comments from me, that have nothing to do with my response to his claim on the first page.
wise_man on January 15, 2009 at 4:02 PM
Maybe Palin will pick presidents Bush for her Vice-Pres!…Stranger things have happened,…look at no birth certificate Barry…: o )
LOLOL,..You are soooo bad!..: o )
christene on January 15, 2009 at 4:02 PM
Blast from the past! Dark days.
HornetSting on January 15, 2009 at 4:02 PM
Hey, Beth
If you’re still hanging around. Are you going to bake a cake for yourself Tuesday? If we don’t see you hanging around here on the 20th, Happy Birthday Early!
kingsjester on January 15, 2009 at 4:02 PM
Don’t you just love how conservatives get labeled “controversial”? Why controversial? Because some people opposed her and she didn’t back down? Same applies to Obama, Biden, and a host of Dems. They’re all “controversial” in the same way as Palin but are never characterized as such.
Attila (Pillage Idiot) on January 15, 2009 at 4:03 PM
Age of Obama….bad is GOOD!
HornetSting on January 15, 2009 at 4:03 PM
At least I managed to bring up something from the last 90 days.
MadisonConservative on January 15, 2009 at 4:03 PM
I’ll grant you that she energized the ticket and improved McCain’s fundraising abilities initially, but the real effect of that on the election was negligible, because Obama still enjoyed such an enormous fundraising advantage anyway.
After the economic crisis worsened doubts about her competence and her disastrous interviews led to her led to her becoming increasingly disfavored. She ended up with really high negatives in the polls. She was definitely a net drag on the ticket.
crr6 on January 15, 2009 at 4:04 PM
well look at that, he posted it at 4:00 while I was composing my comment at 4:02, and he wants to continue.
Just like in the woman selling her virginity page – he needs to seek out a person to fight with in for his entertainment. Exactly like his comment about me at 3:30 when I wasn’t even here.
wise_man on January 15, 2009 at 4:05 PM
You still defend McCain. You can’t be THAT wise.
HornetSting on January 15, 2009 at 4:05 PM
Actually, the link I supplied at 4:00PM is particularly on-topic. Killed two birds with one stone.
MadisonConservative on January 15, 2009 at 4:05 PM
Somewhere between Vietnam, and 20+ years in the senate, he lost his ideals of loyalty…can being a Senator be that enticing? Well, just look at the convictions, prosecutions, number of frauds, the lack of trust, the lies, the attacks on our innocent men of military, the voting fraud, the theivery, bribery, larceny, that resides in that body and I guess I answered my own question.
Sorry McCain, you WERE a great hero, now you are just a step above Murtha, Kerry, and the rest of the “heroes” of the past…
(p.s. wasn’t Benedict Arnold a war hero?)
To all you military who state that you can’t attack a military man who served honorably…revise your argument please. Once you are a civilian, it is obvious you can succumb to the siren call of fame and fortune.
right2bright on January 15, 2009 at 4:05 PM
please, quote me my comment from this page where I “defended” McCain.
I’ll be waiting right here.
wise_man on January 15, 2009 at 4:07 PM
…responding to the person who first commented about you.
MadisonConservative on January 15, 2009 at 4:07 PM
Yes, from overseas, all that money came crashing in…wonder why ANYONE from the middle east would love Obama??? hum.
As far as the Cuda, well, when you suspend your campaign to crawl back to Washington to create the MOAB for taxpayers, you deserve what you get. Hum, who did that, you ask?
Maverick Maverick Maverick.
Besides, Palin was the ONLY conservative on the ticket.
HornetSting on January 15, 2009 at 4:08 PM
Ha. Funny!
Subsunk
Subsunk on January 15, 2009 at 4:08 PM
Santorum has McCain’s number in that subtle assessment.
The GOP members of the Senate would be wise to distance themselves from any initiatives of bipartisanship that McCain sponsors. He has turned his back on conservatives and the party that he claims to be part of.
onlineanalyst on January 15, 2009 at 3:58 PM
Mac turned his back on the Republican party in 2000. Since then he has been bitter and antagonistic. His creds as a POW helped him enormously to overcome his true nature. I’ll stop here.
Cody1991 on January 15, 2009 at 4:08 PM
I agree with most of your remarks. McCain is a war hero and a man who has given more for his country than most. I respect him immensely in that regard. But, he’s not a conservative. And, that was his downfall.
Palin is a conservative. This is why the lefties are afraid of her as well as RINOs.
Conservative_SAHM on January 15, 2009 at 4:09 PM
Uh, wise, I’m not a chicken. I don’t wake up with a wiped out memory every morning. You defend everything that is McCain and attack everyone who doesn’t worship him.
Your reputation proceeds you, my friend.
HornetSting on January 15, 2009 at 4:09 PM
I am sure George Soros will be at the dinner………….
…………. saying “Good job, boys.”
Seven Percent Solution on January 15, 2009 at 4:09 PM
Hey HornetSting, read this:
is this what you mean when you say I “defend” McCaian?
wise_man on January 15, 2009 at 4:09 PM
OIC, so there’s more than one troll on this page. Thanks for clearing that up, cheese in a can.
wise_man on January 15, 2009 at 4:11 PM
Looking at it from BO’s perspective, I’m having difficulty coming up with any political reason he’d invite her to a state function. I’m sure in his and his advisors’ minds that would do nothing except bestow upon her some national political legitimacy. I’m not saying she does or doesn’t have that (but I’m not a Palin fan), but that would be pretty stupid for BO to do. Inviting McCain is a superficial act, but does no harm.
johnnynucleo on January 15, 2009 at 4:12 PM
One out of what…ten thousand attacks against anyone that dares to question the maverick.
As far as how bad I see the maverick. Traitor to his party, those that believe in him and voted for him. They have been betrayed by the democrap lite spitball.
HornetSting on January 15, 2009 at 4:12 PM
You’re obviously a Harvard man…
MadisonConservative on January 15, 2009 at 4:12 PM
You’re not a troll. Just dellusional.
HornetSting on January 15, 2009 at 4:12 PM
Who do you think you’re kidding? You’re going to have to work harder than that to resuscitate your reputation.
FloatingRock on January 15, 2009 at 4:13 PM
The definition of controversial: provoking strong disagreement or disapproval in public debate. Yes, Sarah is controversial by being a conservative American who will not back down from her beliefs. Guilty, as charged and proud of it!
technopeasant on January 15, 2009 at 4:15 PM
Obama is afraid of Sarah Palin, why would he want to invite her to dinner?
t.ferg on January 15, 2009 at 4:16 PM
She doesn’t need to go to that McCain Obama lovefest …
the legislative session is starting soon in AK … state of the state and all that jazz
being a governor is a real job … unlike being a Senator
joey24007 on January 15, 2009 at 4:17 PM
Then we’d be stuck with Joe “The IQ of a Pencil” Biden. I’m not sure who would be worse.
Happy birthday, Ms. Sting. :)
DrMagnolias on January 15, 2009 at 4:19 PM
I am sure George Soros will be at the dinner………….
…………. saying “Good job, boys.”
Seven Percent Solution on January 15, 2009 at 4:09 PM
You betcha!! This time Soros got a return on his “investment.” Remember when he publicly swore of playing politics? Well, he lied. Soros is a trader. Just got to pick the right entry and double down sometimes. This time he got it right. I have no doubt that he’s going to make it pay in spades (is that raaaacist?). The Clintons are his pals, too. Just wait for more interesting ideas like the last one by Soros’ sons suggesting that we do away with the Electoral College.
When you’re an aging, multi-billionaire there probably aren’t too many kicks left in life other than to go for the ultimate power play.
Cody1991 on January 15, 2009 at 4:19 PM
Sarah is too good for that crowd.
Oink on January 15, 2009 at 4:19 PM
After all the help McCain was to Obama in winning the election it’s no wonder he’s having a party for him.
rplat on January 15, 2009 at 4:19 PM
January 19, 5pm est.
Glenn Beck’s first guest on his new show on Fox….
Sarah the Cuda Palin
Let’s support Glenn and his new show!
HornetSting on January 15, 2009 at 4:20 PM
Yes, that was the media narrative. You recite it well.
I provided 2 points ($ and the Chambliss election/comments). You’ve mentioned polls- do you have a link to solid, impartial evidence that Palin hurt the campaign more than she helped?
cs89 on January 15, 2009 at 4:20 PM
Thank ya, Dr.
HornetSting on January 15, 2009 at 4:20 PM
tru dat.
HornetSting on January 15, 2009 at 4:21 PM
One could argue that the help McCain gave to Obama in winning the election was choosing Palin.
johnnynucleo on January 15, 2009 at 4:22 PM
what I have done, is argue against you and people like you were against McCain while the election was down to a vote for one of two people – McCain and Obama. You and people like you repeatedly said that McCain was a democrat, despite the fact that McCain voted with us 80% of the time. And in a choice between Obama and McCain, that having Obama as a president would be worse. But you didnt’ want any part of this. And in addition to this, you now need to think that I wanted McCain because he was the best candidate. I have mentioned many times that I voted for Mitt Romney in the primary election in my state, and after my candidate lost – I wanted McCain to win over Obama, and I did not want Obama to win over McCain. And all you and people like you wanted to talk about was McCain’s position on Amnesty. And since your memory on what I actually said here is so lacking, I’ll also mention that when Bush wanted Hariet Miers as the next supreme court justice, we fought him on that. And we could have fought McCain on amnesty. ANd with Obama, republicans won’t get any opportunity to challenge him. and you need to continue this fantasy of yours that I supported everything about McCain, when in reality I was challenging you and people like you who were against everything about McCain – fully knowing that the result of a lack of support would be the election of Barack Obama. And this is what I fought you and people like you for. And I lost. And you won. And now you need to tear down McCain until there is nothing left, and anyone who didn’t drink your koolaid about how evil McCain is – they need to be destroyed as well.
wise_man on January 15, 2009 at 4:22 PM
Your whining never takes into account the fact that we held our noses and voted for Sarah Palin, who happened to be handicapped with that loser of yours.
MadisonConservative on January 15, 2009 at 4:25 PM
Blah blah blah. We’ve all heard it a thousand times before and still nobody respects your authoritah.
FloatingRock on January 15, 2009 at 4:27 PM
Are you trying to win your argument using the “wall of text” tactic?
Paragraphs man…paragraphs.
Sugarbuzz on January 15, 2009 at 4:29 PM
Nice try, sport. Yes, there were 2 choices. Crappy choices, except for Palin, but we had to vote for a dem lite to get to her.
You still defended him thru the disaster of a campaign that he ran, not wanting to offend, even when everyone was trying to destroy his VP, the true conservative.
You defended him after the fact. He is a loser.
He lost. That is true. We are looking ahead, but we still like to beat a dead horse, since the dead horse had vowed to work AGAINST HIS OWN PARTY AND HELP THE CREATURE THAT RAN AGAINST HIM AND MOCKED HIM!
HornetSting on January 15, 2009 at 4:29 PM
…..Aren’t you the kid…..marvelous!
HornetSting on January 15, 2009 at 4:30 PM
I did not ask for McCain. I did not vote for McCain when the GOP primary came to my state. I wanted McCain to win and not Obama. I wanted Obama to lose, not McCain. McCain is the one who picked Sarah Palin. If it wasn’t for McCain, Sarah Palin would have been content to stay a governor with a 90% approval rating. McCain has never said anything bad about Sarah Palin, he’s only had glowing words for her. Sarah Palin has only said nice things about McCain, she’s never said anything bad about him.
If your version of events were true, then at the least, Sarah Palin would feel free to tell us all the truth since she is no longer under his evil influence. As I said, its a good thing that Sarah Palin isn’t anywhere near the evil McCain or Obama, and yet you still whine and complain.
wise_man on January 15, 2009 at 4:30 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 … 6 Next »