Audio: Laura Ingraham interviews woman auctioning off her virginity
posted at 4:28 pm on January 14, 2009 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | regular view
I’m tempted to call it comedy gold except that there’s no punchline. It’s just 15 minutes of Ingraham trying to shame this woman into regret. And failing utterly.
On second thought, I suppose the phone call from the transsexual prostitute with questions for Alan Greenspan would qualify as a punchline. Exit question: $3.7 million? Really?
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Battlestar Galactica, Friday nights at 10 on SciFi.
At least, that’s how I get my fill of toaster sex….
Anna on January 14, 2009 at 6:42 PM
From the YouTube comments
FTW
HYTEAndy on January 14, 2009 at 6:43 PM
Is this irony? It has to be something, but I can’t tell what.
Darth Executor on January 14, 2009 at 6:55 PM
Only in AMERICA you say,
dammit,such a bloody pity,EH!Haha.
canopfor on January 14, 2009 at 6:59 PM
For a lot of conservatives who profess belief in individual liberty you all sure are just awfully disrespectful of this woman and her choice.
cyclosarin on January 14, 2009 at 7:05 PM
Not really, no.
It’s a guy thing. Not sure I can explain, or that you would understand if I could.
Hollowpoint on January 14, 2009 at 7:06 PM
At least, thats how I get my fill of toaster sex…
Anna on Jan 14,2009 at 6:42PM.
Anna:If you make a mess,with said toaster unit,
for the love of gawd,make sure its unplugged,
and what ever you do,don’t jam a ‘ShamWow into
the orifice of the toaster unit,for a clean-up!!
The shamwow just might just swell up inside said
toaster unit,and if that happen’s you will be in
a world of hurt!!:) (I’m kidding,haha:)
canopfor on January 14, 2009 at 7:07 PM
A good example of why religious conservatism is not the path out of the desert for conservatives. Freedom is not a shame or a sin. This woman is free to make this choice regardless of what the morality enthused voices like Ingraham think. Focus on limited government and fiscal restraint is the only hope.
JeffB. on January 14, 2009 at 7:11 PM
I’m a conservative Christian myself, but I agree with you, JeffB. I heard part of the interview and found myself thinking,” I can see why some people have a bad opinion of religious conservatives when we’re represented like that.” I like Laura Ingram, but thought she did a poor job on the interview.
americanpatriot on January 14, 2009 at 7:19 PM
That sure is one high priced garden tool.
Zaire67 on January 14, 2009 at 7:23 PM
a man would want a virgin…
Esthier on Jan 14,2009 at 6:09PM.
Estheir:As a guy,I’ll take the car analog!
Its like being in the car showroom,and like,theirs this
nice blue with gorgeous black interior Chevelle SS,
that has a Big Block engine,it shines nice,but it also
goes as well!
Brand new,zero miles,’a virgin’ lets say!
Now that’s the ‘virgin’ I would like to have!
So,now you’re in the used car lot,same car,exactly,
ever option!
Lots and lots of miles,and obvious outside wear and tear!
So,Me thinks that the ‘brand new shiny Chevelle is more
desireous,because you would be the one,from the get go to
run the h#ll out of it!
Now,the used car,who knows where its been,and how hard the
car has been driven!
I would rather have the shiny spanking new car,every time!
However,were talking cars!!!!!!!!!!!!!:)
canopfor on January 14, 2009 at 7:24 PM
Wow.
I’d tap.
blatantblue on January 14, 2009 at 7:32 PM
She’s no virgin. I bet she’s got a mary like a welly top….you’ll need to strap a plank across your arse to stop yourself falling in.
LimeyGeek on January 14, 2009 at 7:32 PM
Everyone is sick of your rambling, incoherent, poorly worded posts.
Xolom on January 14, 2009 at 7:36 PM
LOL OLOLOL
blatantblue on January 14, 2009 at 7:38 PM
You crack me up!
Anna on January 14, 2009 at 7:38 PM
Relax!
blatantblue on January 14, 2009 at 7:39 PM
You can’t be serious. A belief in individual liberty does not mean we can’t be critical of stupidity or stupid choices. I personally would not attempt to deny any adult the right to sell themselves if they so wish. That is their business. That doesn’t mean we can’t be critical. This is also part of individual liberty.
LOL
Dritanian on January 14, 2009 at 8:00 PM
Uh, have way through the interview she says she’s had “casual sexual encounters with men and I’ve had serious sexual encounters with boyfriends.”
terryannonline on January 14, 2009 at 8:00 PM
Terryann,
I noticed that she said that too. How can she be a virgin if she’s had both casual and serious sexual encounters? The only thing I can decipher from that is she’s using the word encounters as sexual contact other than intercourse. I’m giving her the benefit of the doubt. Perhaps she’s run all the bases but stopped just shy of home plate. If so, she’s much smarter than her sister.
Kim Priestap on January 14, 2009 at 8:09 PM
can’t she be arrested for soliciting prostitution
tomas on January 14, 2009 at 8:12 PM
I have throughly enjoyed this thread, you are some funny folks.
Illinidiva on January 14, 2009 at 5:30 PM
You could almost be my daughter, same age, same complaint and she doesn’t suffer fools gladly. Only mom who desperately wanting grandchildren (me) care. You’re young.
Cindy Munford on January 14, 2009 at 8:13 PM
Darlin, she put herself out there. If someone here was trying to stop her you might have an argument. Disrespectful? Really?
Cindy Munford on January 14, 2009 at 8:16 PM
What will sloppy seconds cost?
Hog Wild on January 14, 2009 at 8:18 PM
This gal looks like a $10 whore on New Year’s Eve
& about as virginal as a Hilton sister or Rock of Love reject.
Mike D. on January 14, 2009 at 8:21 PM
Where does the bidding begin?
Ernest on January 14, 2009 at 8:22 PM
Given that she’ll apparently be a millionare after the deal is completed, it’ll probably still be more than you’d want to pay.
Hollowpoint on January 14, 2009 at 8:23 PM
79 cents in the cut out bin.
wccawa on January 14, 2009 at 8:23 PM
Live and let live. What she did hurt no one else. So why not leave her the hell alone? We cannot turn into a party of scolds.
The Opinionator on January 14, 2009 at 8:24 PM
Wow.
I’d tap.
blatantblue on Jan 14,2009 at 7:32PM.
blatantblue: This tapping you speak of;
Will you be tapping, Coarse or Fine Thread? Haha:)
canopfor on January 14, 2009 at 8:30 PM
She has put herself out for the highest bidder, been in papers across several nations and you are worried about what people will think of Republicans? This is a funny thread. Get it? Not serious! Suggest you lighten up a tad.
Cindy Munford on January 14, 2009 at 8:31 PM
Any way I can
blatantblue on January 14, 2009 at 8:34 PM
Everyone here is trashing her.
Its amazing she stayed a virgin this long!
blatantblue on January 14, 2009 at 8:35 PM
Paris Hilton is a virgin too.
Mr. Joe on January 14, 2009 at 8:37 PM
ahaha, I was afraid to ask if losing her virginity wouldn’t make her somebody elses sloppy seconds.
Hey, as long as there are men willing to pay there will be women offering to get paid. Simple stuff. She won’t get 3.5 mill the second time.
scalleywag on January 14, 2009 at 8:40 PM
Good lord,the next thing I’m gonna hear is
that this chick,
is traveling abroad,
on Virgin Atlantic,
to the Virgin Islands!!!Hehe.
canopfor on January 14, 2009 at 8:43 PM
Won’t Uncle Sam get almost half? Maybe she ought to hold out for 6!
scalleywag on January 14, 2009 at 8:44 PM
Maybe Richard Branson has made a bid!
scalleywag on January 14, 2009 at 8:47 PM
Cancel your Internet subscription.
Darth Executor on January 14, 2009 at 8:49 PM
Yes we can. And I find it ironic you’re scolding us for scolding someone.
Darth Executor on January 14, 2009 at 8:50 PM
Sounds familiar.
No surprise that you’re up for casting first stones.
MadisonConservative on January 14, 2009 at 8:56 PM
She’ll regret this. Life’s not about money. 40 years from now she’ll still regret it, long after all the money’s been spent.
Mojave Mark on January 14, 2009 at 8:58 PM
Laura is not a voiceover artist, she is a talk show host. She is paid for more than just mouthing words, just like if you were in a relationship with someone, you would hope it was more than just sex, or they loved you for more than your money. The publicity involved with this stunt dictates the type of relationships this girl will be involved in for the rest of her life. Which is fine. Maybe she’s not that special. Maybe she’s just a hole nobody else penetrated. So it has been decreed.
chunderroad on January 14, 2009 at 9:01 PM
She won’t regret it. Whoever ends with the winning bid will, though.
RightOFLeft on January 14, 2009 at 9:04 PM
You used a whole bunch of letters The One uses. I guess you know a thing or two about twigs.
At any rate, when I’m selling ass drillings for cash you’ll have a point about “throwing first stones”. Until then maybe you’ll find a pair yourself so you don’t feel so left out all the time.
Darth Executor on January 14, 2009 at 9:04 PM
Perhaps she is really a nut job who has the Herp and wants to spread it.
You know, like the criminals on Law and Order SVU
blatantblue on January 14, 2009 at 9:06 PM
I used to love Laura when she didn’t take herself so seriously. Now, she is Laura the Crusader, a tired act. My wife and I stopped listening to her more than a year ago because she always comes across as preachy and pushy. Even when I agreed with her, I found myself rooting for her guest.
Does anyone know what her ratings are? I have a feeling that she has been fading for some time now.
RedSoxNation on January 14, 2009 at 9:07 PM
Like I said to Xolom.
Relaxxx!
blatantblue on January 14, 2009 at 9:10 PM
Yes. It will seem like a good idea, then a really really good idea. Then after a cigarette and a hug it will seem like a terrible waste of a few million dollars.
Oh well, better than having invested in CitiGroup.
dedalus on January 14, 2009 at 9:10 PM
Look. If I had a friend with large breasticles (which I do), who wanted to sell her virginity off (which I don’t), Id say:
blatantblue on January 14, 2009 at 9:12 PM
I’m very relaxed. In fact I thought it was quite witty considering I put it together in about 10 seconds.
Darth Executor on January 14, 2009 at 9:14 PM
Then its c00l dog
I like when i say something witty too. Rare, but delish
blatantblue on January 14, 2009 at 9:15 PM
I think just about all of the hosts do this to one degree or the other, I do a lot of switching between Laura and Boortz and Hannity and Beck. Hosts are like preachers, they all have a certain audience that they deliver. The only two I never waiver from are Rush and Bill Bennett, but that’s just me.
Cindy Munford on January 14, 2009 at 9:16 PM
Tough crowd.
Reaps on January 14, 2009 at 9:19 PM
As the sargeant said in “FROM HERE TO ETERNITY”:
“If I ever have to start paying for it, I’m giving it up.”
(Will the ho play some Dick Hymen mood music for the ceremony?)
profitsbeard on January 14, 2009 at 9:21 PM
Wow, from self-righteousness to challenging others’ manhood in under a quarter of an hour. Another big surprise.
MadisonConservative on January 14, 2009 at 9:22 PM
I wonder what Elliott Spitzer has bid
bullseye on January 14, 2009 at 9:25 PM
That.Chick.Is.Hot.
nickj116 on January 14, 2009 at 9:26 PM
LOL!
nickj116 on January 14, 2009 at 9:27 PM
I should clarify. She’s hot in that pic on the front page of HotAir, but she’s very meh in the Telegraph article.
nickj116 on January 14, 2009 at 9:29 PM
I hope for her sake that she doesn’t go through with this. Either way, it doesn’t affect me. However, when teaching my children how to make choices, I must say that I respect the worth and dignity of this woman, but I certainly have no respect for her ability to make wise decisions. Why should I have to respect the poor decision-making ability of others? If someone wishes to prostitute themselves, so be it, but why should I have to respect such a decision? Should I respect the choices of “Darwin Awardees”? I’m dedicating my life to ensure others have freedom. Why I should respect whatever people do with that freedom is beyond me.
Send_Me on January 14, 2009 at 9:30 PM
Does she accept cash, check or credit card?
4shoes on January 14, 2009 at 9:32 PM
Wampum
blatantblue on January 14, 2009 at 9:34 PM
I just hope the government doesn’t make her pay tax on that… which is why they would not consider this prostitution.
Good for her (seriously)
Jared_MA on January 14, 2009 at 9:37 PM
Right honey. Your a virgin. With virgin olive oil too. Hmmmmmm….I don’t think so.
Waste of money. Sue her for fale advertising.
Sapwolf on January 14, 2009 at 9:49 PM
Hey, I’m gonna get the business plan ready and head over to Sand Hill road up the peninsula to get venture capital. Wish me luck. If anybody wants in, e-mail Ed and he’ll forward.
And NO, this will not be a hostile takeover, but I will be the White Knight.
Let’s roll.
Sapwolf on January 14, 2009 at 9:51 PM
Cindy Munford,
I was referring to Laura. She was not joking. Me, I could really care less what she does.
The Opinionator on January 14, 2009 at 10:06 PM
Oh so that is where our bail out money is going. Seriously this episode gives creedence to an eat the rich mentality.
I wonder how this money was ‘earned’. The person spending this money is definitely on an ego trip of emormous proportions. They deserve each other. The sick ass probably thinks he can buy her love as well. Rich people are really stoopid about simple things. She may be a virgin physically but judging how she dresses her mind is a $3 whore!
sonnyspats1 on January 14, 2009 at 10:06 PM
Great point. I agree that Rush and Bill Bennett are very different from Laura and Hannity, and much better for it. I would add Dennis Prager and Hugh Hewitt to that list.
Hugh Hewitt, for instance, has a great segment each week with two law professors from opposite sides of the political specrum who debate one of the current legal issues. Its done in a very respectful manner that flushes out the underlying arguments and assumptions underlying each position. By doing so, you actually increase your understanding of an issue, which is critical for winning the public debate over the issue. You never learn anything from listening to Laura.
RedSoxNation on January 14, 2009 at 10:07 PM
Darth,
Not scolding. Again, referring to the vehemence of Laura. I listen to her on XM and she is a pretty good listen. But, it is hard for her to say republicans are the party of small government and freedom when you try to tell everyone else how to live.
Note, I am a republican so no brickbats!
The Opinionator on January 14, 2009 at 10:08 PM
And the difference between a prostitute and this woman auctioning off for money the right to take her virginity is . . . what?
Phil Byler on January 14, 2009 at 10:17 PM
I just did a search for “virginity repair”. I also rememeber seeing a news article on a device that helps fake being a virgin. If she plays this right, she might be able to try the same gig a couple of times.
Also, just where in the hell is she going to college? for that money she could buy the damn college.
Well, if it all works out, she should put some of it away for buying grades. Picture her taking Poly-sci with Prof. Blago “Hey, Grades are valuable F(*&ing tings. How much you gonna give me to get a A here? ”
One final thought. I can’t imagine the pressure for the guy to perform “SH*T.. I’m Paying 4 million dollars for this.. It better be like a steel bar”
bullseye on January 14, 2009 at 10:18 PM
The chic’s a dog.
These men are as stupid as a man with extra cash can get.
The smart thing to do, and much more cost effective, would be to advertise an offer of $25,000 to any willing virgins. Then have them send in an application with pictures and video. Then you could have your pick, instead of blowing your wad on a dog like that. Save a BUNCH of money too.
Idiots.
Saltysam on January 14, 2009 at 10:30 PM
Given to my husband of 30 years. Still married. Still the only one. Wouldn’t have it any other way.
Mommynator on January 14, 2009 at 10:30 PM
Uhhhh..this is not a ‘fetching woman’…and only an AIG exec or a Congressman (sorry, Congressperson) would be dumb enough to pay a single red cent for that skanklet..virgin or not…then again, didn’t congress and the Treasury just buy the company that produced the Pontiac Aztec? Ok, then she should hold out for 700 Billion, minimum.
AUINSC on January 14, 2009 at 10:33 PM
I listened to the interview this morning. I don’t recall Laura demanding that Congress needs to step in.
Saltysam on January 14, 2009 at 10:33 PM
LOL!
Saltysam on January 14, 2009 at 10:34 PM
And so much for buying the cow or getting the milk for free.
chunderroad on January 14, 2009 at 10:35 PM
No kidding. I probably agree with her on 80% of things, but her humorless, priggish, angry scold act gets old really quickly.
I’m not going to listen to the clip, but I think I’d find myself rooting for the wanna-be ho here, just like I did for that little Aussie douchebag a year or two ago who threw the party that wrecked his parents’ house when the tabloid TV lady was trying to get him to take his sunglasses off.
“Aren’t you ashamed???”
“No, actually, I’m not.”
I don’t care who you are, that’s funny stuff.
Alex_SF on January 14, 2009 at 10:40 PM
Who hasn’t done something (or someone) they later regret? How many people marry as virgins, or lose their virginity so someone they end up marrying anymore?
Is it prostitution? Yep, obviously. However, it’s being done in a legal manner, and given the money being offered I can’t really judge her. Whether or not prostitution is immoral, it is (at least in this case) victimless, and it seems like she’s getting the better part of the deal by far.
Hollowpoint on January 14, 2009 at 10:40 PM
Has anyone seen the contract?
For 3.7 million, I’d be throwing in a few clauses of my own.
Saltysam on January 14, 2009 at 10:44 PM
She’s most likely what I like to call a “virgin slut”. I’ve known of quite a few in highschool. They were technically “virgins” but they gave more sucky-sucky then Monica Lewinsky at a Clinton family reunion. Quite a few also took it in the pooper. Thankfully I never touched any of them. To me, if you’re a “virgin slut”, you’re pretty much not a virgin anymore even if the hymen is intact.
DethMetalCookieMonst on January 14, 2009 at 10:51 PM
How dare you speak for “everybody”?
canopfor, our good and loyal friend from Canada, is free to ramble, or not, coherently, or not, as he damn pleases. So are you, and all of us. The only thing we need to respect are the HA-parlor-rules. It must be exalting in your world.
Entelechy on January 14, 2009 at 10:58 PM
Whether you marry the person you lost your virginity to is irrelevant to what it meant to you at the time. And if you do something you regret, does a few million make it easier in the end? If so, then you have no right to complain about anything ever. You deserve to be treated like a slave.
chunderroad on January 14, 2009 at 11:12 PM
I hope she puts a few dollars from the payment toward a nose job.
Tim Burton on January 14, 2009 at 11:20 PM
The only thing virgin on her is her nose…
and even that’s been blown.
Saltysam on January 14, 2009 at 11:22 PM
That’s great. You are so right…
RedSoxNation on January 14, 2009 at 11:23 PM
About 3.69 million dollars….
Saltysam on January 14, 2009 at 11:23 PM
The e-knights on here trying to admonish people for passing judgment on the expensive whore and thinking somehow it will “hurt the conservative movement” are comedy gold.
Just what do you people believe in, anyway? “Not passing judgment” on someone that is obviously sinning and/or violating societal mores is a liberal conceit, last time I checked.
Sugarbuzz on January 14, 2009 at 11:27 PM
How much you want to bet those Ebay bids are jokes and she never sees a dime.
And anyone who thinks that skank is a virgin deserves to lose their money.
Mr. Joe on January 14, 2009 at 11:27 PM
They are conservative neophytes, if conservative at all.
They confuse the freedom to openly judge in a free society with the repulsive liberal impulse to impose their will on others through unconstitutional statute.
Saltysam on January 14, 2009 at 11:32 PM
I wonder what they are offering her for the film rights. /sarc
DannoJyd on January 14, 2009 at 11:33 PM
Why in the world would someone make a movie with this storyline, except to show it in a XXX place in New York City?!?
Laura Ingraham is right; its pornification, plain and simple
ToddonCapeCod on January 14, 2009 at 11:36 PM
If I was the one able to afford a piece of 3.7 million dollar ‘virgin’ kootchie koo, I’d be insisting on medically verifiable proof that NO Ball Park Frank has been inside that hoagie roll, and by hoagie roll, I mean, not a good looking hotdog bun. You get the picture.
brewser on January 14, 2009 at 11:41 PM
Today, Disney could do a soft version. Sort of a prince, princess, evil stepmother, happily ever after type thing.
Stop being so reactionary.
Saltysam on January 14, 2009 at 11:44 PM
Virgin, ha…..in her dreams.
Johan Klaus on January 14, 2009 at 11:44 PM
Nobody here has called for the government to impose their will. I take it you’re not aware that one can critisize without demanding that the government do something, right?
DethMetalCookieMonst on January 14, 2009 at 11:50 PM
My wife and I saved ourselves for the other. In doing so, we gave each other something more valuable than any amount of money: by staying faithful to each other, both before and after our wedding day, we’ve laid a foundation of trust that no words or money can earn. My wife knows that if I could refrain from having sex before marriage, in spite of all the hormones and “cultural pressure”, then she won’t have to worry about me while I’m away. What can this gal say to her future husband? “Sorry honey, I would have saved myself just for you, but the money was too good.” If she’s willing to sell herself for money now, what’s to stop her from doing it in the future? This story is more sad than anything.
Send_Me on January 14, 2009 at 11:53 PM
DethMetalCookieMonst on January 14, 2009 at 11:50 PM
Slow down…take a breath.
You completely misread what I wrote to mean the polar opposite.
Saltysam on January 14, 2009 at 11:56 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »