<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pay for play: More Hillary work for donors exposed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/13/pay-for-play-more-hillary-work-for-donors-exposed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/13/pay-for-play-more-hillary-work-for-donors-exposed/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 02:56:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/13/pay-for-play-more-hillary-work-for-donors-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-1850909</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 01:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40330#comment-1850909</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;slings and arrows...&lt;/strong&gt;

Many blogs have stopped using trackbacks because dealing with spam became too burdensome.A Trackback is one of three types of Linkbacks,...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>slings and arrows&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Many blogs have stopped using trackbacks because dealing with spam became too burdensome.A Trackback is one of three types of Linkbacks,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kanda</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/13/pay-for-play-more-hillary-work-for-donors-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-1779150</link>
		<dc:creator>kanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40330#comment-1779150</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;…and maybe shorten the interminably long campaign season we no longer need in the era of instant communications, yet seems to be growing longer each election.

James on January 13, 2009 at 10:21 PM

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yep and put restrictions on how much money can be spent on elections. Spending a collective over 1 billion dollars is crazy. Of course that goes back to the corruption of all politicians we recently spoke of. The last few Republican congresses set the standard for corrupt politicians and the democrats learned the lesson well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>…and maybe shorten the interminably long campaign season we no longer need in the era of instant communications, yet seems to be growing longer each election.</p>
<p>James on January 13, 2009 at 10:21 PM</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yep and put restrictions on how much money can be spent on elections. Spending a collective over 1 billion dollars is crazy. Of course that goes back to the corruption of all politicians we recently spoke of. The last few Republican congresses set the standard for corrupt politicians and the democrats learned the lesson well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kanda</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/13/pay-for-play-more-hillary-work-for-donors-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-1779147</link>
		<dc:creator>kanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40330#comment-1779147</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Yes, I understand the process well. That’s not the point.&lt;/strong&gt; I still think that anyone who desires the Presidency ought to be vetted to the point where their colon needs six months to heal before they can formally announce their candidacy.

It would save us all the Berg lawsuits as well as the Clintonic corruption.

James on January 13, 2009 at 10:19 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Nay, verily I say unto thee, &lt;strong&gt;that is exactly the point&lt;/strong&gt;
what you &lt;strong&gt;want&lt;/strong&gt; would place unconstitutional restrictions on the presidency. It can be fixed with a lil ole constitutional amendment.

Bergs unfounded lawsuit is just that, unfounded. Being born in Hawaii Obama is a citizen and he is 35 years old or older. That meets the constitutional qualifications.

Somehow you seem to think that the Clintons are the corrupt politicians. It would be easier for you to list the politicians who are not corrupt. None immediately come to mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong>Yes, I understand the process well. That’s not the point.</strong> I still think that anyone who desires the Presidency ought to be vetted to the point where their colon needs six months to heal before they can formally announce their candidacy.</p>
<p>It would save us all the Berg lawsuits as well as the Clintonic corruption.</p>
<p>James on January 13, 2009 at 10:19 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Nay, verily I say unto thee, <strong>that is exactly the point</strong><br />
what you <strong>want</strong> would place unconstitutional restrictions on the presidency. It can be fixed with a lil ole constitutional amendment.</p>
<p>Bergs unfounded lawsuit is just that, unfounded. Being born in Hawaii Obama is a citizen and he is 35 years old or older. That meets the constitutional qualifications.</p>
<p>Somehow you seem to think that the Clintons are the corrupt politicians. It would be easier for you to list the politicians who are not corrupt. None immediately come to mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberty Pundit</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/13/pay-for-play-more-hillary-work-for-donors-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-1779118</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberty Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40330#comment-1779118</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Surprise, Democrats Are Still Corrupt...&lt;/strong&gt;

The Clintons in a &quot;pay-for-play&quot; scandal?  Unpossible!  Why, Democrats are all pure as the driven&#8230;
......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Surprise, Democrats Are Still Corrupt&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The Clintons in a &quot;pay-for-play&quot; scandal?  Unpossible!  Why, Democrats are all pure as the driven&#8230;<br />
&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/13/pay-for-play-more-hillary-work-for-donors-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-1778830</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40330#comment-1778830</guid>
		<description>...and maybe shorten the interminably long campaign season we no longer need in the era of instant communications, yet seems to be growing longer each election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and maybe shorten the interminably long campaign season we no longer need in the era of instant communications, yet seems to be growing longer each election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/13/pay-for-play-more-hillary-work-for-donors-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-1778822</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40330#comment-1778822</guid>
		<description>Yes, I understand the process well. That&#039;s not the point. I still think that anyone who desires the Presidency ought to be vetted to the point where their colon needs six months to heal before they can formally announce their candidacy.

It would save us all the Berg lawsuits as well as the Clintonic corruption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I understand the process well. That&#8217;s not the point. I still think that anyone who desires the Presidency ought to be vetted to the point where their colon needs six months to heal before they can formally announce their candidacy.</p>
<p>It would save us all the Berg lawsuits as well as the Clintonic corruption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kanda</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/13/pay-for-play-more-hillary-work-for-donors-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-1778449</link>
		<dc:creator>kanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40330#comment-1778449</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Sure, but I’m asking why we let this crap go under our radar when we’re deciding who we want to be POTUS, not why the hearings are shams.

James on January 13, 2009 at 7:08 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sorry I thought you knew. To be POTUS you only need to be elected by the people just like a Senator or Congressperson. For a cabinet position you need to be Nominated by the POTUS-Elect and then be approved by our elected representatives in the Senate. In our democracy Obama does not need a security clearance either. He is the POTUS-Elect. We the people elected him. Don&#039;t like it? It&#039;s because of that pesky darn constitution thing as amended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Sure, but I’m asking why we let this crap go under our radar when we’re deciding who we want to be POTUS, not why the hearings are shams.</p>
<p>James on January 13, 2009 at 7:08 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Sorry I thought you knew. To be POTUS you only need to be elected by the people just like a Senator or Congressperson. For a cabinet position you need to be Nominated by the POTUS-Elect and then be approved by our elected representatives in the Senate. In our democracy Obama does not need a security clearance either. He is the POTUS-Elect. We the people elected him. Don&#8217;t like it? It&#8217;s because of that pesky darn constitution thing as amended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/13/pay-for-play-more-hillary-work-for-donors-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-1778398</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40330#comment-1778398</guid>
		<description>Sure, but I&#039;m asking why we let this crap go under our radar when we&#039;re deciding who we want to be POTUS, not why the hearings are shams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, but I&#8217;m asking why we let this crap go under our radar when we&#8217;re deciding who we want to be POTUS, not why the hearings are shams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kanda</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/13/pay-for-play-more-hillary-work-for-donors-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-1778316</link>
		<dc:creator>kanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40330#comment-1778316</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Why don’t we find these things out before we let them run for President? Are these cabinet jobs somehow more critical than the top job that we care what kind of person fills them, but the POTUS only requires a popularity contest?

I’m baffled.

James on January 13, 2009 at 6:27 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

These hearings are a big sham. The purpose is to get the Senators before the cameras for a couple of soundbites. It tricks the people who vote into believing that congress actual does useful work. These are Senators for Gods sake. If they don&#039;t approve Hillary they have to deal with her wrath for the next 4 years and probably more. If they approve her they get rid of her now. ha ha politics you gotta love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why don’t we find these things out before we let them run for President? Are these cabinet jobs somehow more critical than the top job that we care what kind of person fills them, but the POTUS only requires a popularity contest?</p>
<p>I’m baffled.</p>
<p>James on January 13, 2009 at 6:27 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>These hearings are a big sham. The purpose is to get the Senators before the cameras for a couple of soundbites. It tricks the people who vote into believing that congress actual does useful work. These are Senators for Gods sake. If they don&#8217;t approve Hillary they have to deal with her wrath for the next 4 years and probably more. If they approve her they get rid of her now. ha ha politics you gotta love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/13/pay-for-play-more-hillary-work-for-donors-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-1778277</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40330#comment-1778277</guid>
		<description>Why are there any surprises in a confirmation hearing or the vetting process when the appointee was a candidate for President just last year? Negative information about both Richardson and Clinton has somehow only now come to light after all the oppo-research they endured.

Why don&#039;t we find these things out before we let them run for President? Are these cabinet jobs somehow more critical than the top job that we care what kind of person fills them, but the POTUS only requires a popularity contest?

I&#039;m baffled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are there any surprises in a confirmation hearing or the vetting process when the appointee was a candidate for President just last year? Negative information about both Richardson and Clinton has somehow only now come to light after all the oppo-research they endured.</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t we find these things out before we let them run for President? Are these cabinet jobs somehow more critical than the top job that we care what kind of person fills them, but the POTUS only requires a popularity contest?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m baffled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kanda</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/13/pay-for-play-more-hillary-work-for-donors-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-1778054</link>
		<dc:creator>kanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40330#comment-1778054</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;NoDonkey on January 13, 2009 at 4:44 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This happened during W&#039;s watch do you make the same accusation about him?

&lt;blockquote&gt;     
(CNN)March 28, 2008 -- A Chinese-born engineer who conspired to export U.S. military technology to China was sentenced Monday to 24 years and 4 months in federal prison.

Chi Mak, a 65-year-old naturalized U.S. citizen living in Downey, California, was found guilty of having orchestrated the conspiracy to obtain naval technology and to illegally export the material to China, the Department of Justice said in a news release. Mak worked for defense contractor Power Paragon, 

U.S. District Judge Cormac J. Carney handed down the sentence and imposed a $50,000 fine.

&quot;We will never know the full extent of the damage that Mr. Mak has done to our national security,&quot; Carney wrote in a &quot;Statement of Reasons&quot; filed with the sentence. &quot;A high-end ... sentence will provide a strong deterrent to the PRC (People&#039;s Republic of China) not to send its agents here to steal American military secrets.&quot;

Last May, a federal jury found Mak guilty of conspiracy, two counts of attempting to violate export control laws, failing to register as an agent of a foreign government and making false statements to federal investigators.

Feds: U.S. defense analyst leaked secrets to China 
The FBI and the Naval Criminal Investigative Service determined that co-conspirators gave Mak lists of information they were seeking, including information about nuclear-powered submarines.

The statement said that a CD-ROM containing such information was found in Mak&#039;s luggage in October 2005 as he and his wife were preparing to get on a flight from Los Angeles to China.

Four co-conspirators have pleaded guilty     
(CNN) -- A Chinese-born engineer who conspired to export U.S. military technology to China was sentenced Monday to 24 years and 4 months in federal prison.

Chi Mak, a 65-year-old naturalized U.S. citizen living in Downey, California, was found guilty of having orchestrated the conspiracy to obtain naval technology and to illegally export the material to China, the Department of Justice said in a news release. Mak worked for defense contractor Power Paragon, 

U.S. District Judge Cormac J. Carney handed down the sentence and imposed a $50,000 fine.

&quot;We will never know the full extent of the damage that Mr. Mak has done to our national security,&quot; Carney wrote in a &quot;Statement of Reasons&quot; filed with the sentence. &quot;A high-end ... sentence will provide a strong deterrent to the PRC (People&#039;s Republic of China) not to send its agents here to steal American military secrets.&quot;

Last May, a federal jury found Mak guilty of conspiracy, two counts of attempting to violate export control laws, failing to register as an agent of a foreign government and making false statements to federal investigators.

Don&#039;t Miss
Feds: U.S. defense analyst leaked secrets to China 
The FBI and the Naval Criminal Investigative Service determined that co-conspirators gave Mak lists of information they were seeking, including information about nuclear-powered submarines.

The statement said that a CD-ROM containing such information was found in Mak&#039;s luggage in October 2005 as he and his wife were preparing to get on a flight from Los Angeles to China.

Four co-conspirators have pleaded guilty&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>NoDonkey on January 13, 2009 at 4:44 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>This happened during W&#8217;s watch do you make the same accusation about him?</p>
<blockquote><p>
(CNN)March 28, 2008 &#8212; A Chinese-born engineer who conspired to export U.S. military technology to China was sentenced Monday to 24 years and 4 months in federal prison.</p>
<p>Chi Mak, a 65-year-old naturalized U.S. citizen living in Downey, California, was found guilty of having orchestrated the conspiracy to obtain naval technology and to illegally export the material to China, the Department of Justice said in a news release. Mak worked for defense contractor Power Paragon, </p>
<p>U.S. District Judge Cormac J. Carney handed down the sentence and imposed a $50,000 fine.</p>
<p>&#8220;We will never know the full extent of the damage that Mr. Mak has done to our national security,&#8221; Carney wrote in a &#8220;Statement of Reasons&#8221; filed with the sentence. &#8220;A high-end &#8230; sentence will provide a strong deterrent to the PRC (People&#8217;s Republic of China) not to send its agents here to steal American military secrets.&#8221;</p>
<p>Last May, a federal jury found Mak guilty of conspiracy, two counts of attempting to violate export control laws, failing to register as an agent of a foreign government and making false statements to federal investigators.</p>
<p>Feds: U.S. defense analyst leaked secrets to China<br />
The FBI and the Naval Criminal Investigative Service determined that co-conspirators gave Mak lists of information they were seeking, including information about nuclear-powered submarines.</p>
<p>The statement said that a CD-ROM containing such information was found in Mak&#8217;s luggage in October 2005 as he and his wife were preparing to get on a flight from Los Angeles to China.</p>
<p>Four co-conspirators have pleaded guilty<br />
(CNN) &#8212; A Chinese-born engineer who conspired to export U.S. military technology to China was sentenced Monday to 24 years and 4 months in federal prison.</p>
<p>Chi Mak, a 65-year-old naturalized U.S. citizen living in Downey, California, was found guilty of having orchestrated the conspiracy to obtain naval technology and to illegally export the material to China, the Department of Justice said in a news release. Mak worked for defense contractor Power Paragon, </p>
<p>U.S. District Judge Cormac J. Carney handed down the sentence and imposed a $50,000 fine.</p>
<p>&#8220;We will never know the full extent of the damage that Mr. Mak has done to our national security,&#8221; Carney wrote in a &#8220;Statement of Reasons&#8221; filed with the sentence. &#8220;A high-end &#8230; sentence will provide a strong deterrent to the PRC (People&#8217;s Republic of China) not to send its agents here to steal American military secrets.&#8221;</p>
<p>Last May, a federal jury found Mak guilty of conspiracy, two counts of attempting to violate export control laws, failing to register as an agent of a foreign government and making false statements to federal investigators.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t Miss<br />
Feds: U.S. defense analyst leaked secrets to China<br />
The FBI and the Naval Criminal Investigative Service determined that co-conspirators gave Mak lists of information they were seeking, including information about nuclear-powered submarines.</p>
<p>The statement said that a CD-ROM containing such information was found in Mak&#8217;s luggage in October 2005 as he and his wife were preparing to get on a flight from Los Angeles to China.</p>
<p>Four co-conspirators have pleaded guilty</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kanda</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/13/pay-for-play-more-hillary-work-for-donors-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-1777881</link>
		<dc:creator>kanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40330#comment-1777881</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;That their nuclear program just happened to advance 50 years during the Clinton Administration? 

Although she has plausible deniability, given that she’s a complete idiot and doesn’t recall anything during the eight years she was in the White House, that didn’t reflect just magnificently on her.

NoDonkey on January 13, 2009 at 4:44 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Do you forget she was in the ceremonial role of first lady during the Clinton Presidency? Do you really think she is an idiot? How could an idiot do what you accuse her of without any proof?

I believe there was a chinese scientist who passed on Nuclear secrets to the chineses. Are you blaming her for that?

Are you picking on her because she is a woman? I&#039;m beginning to wonder. Most people would pick of Bill Clintoon for that maybe but not her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>That their nuclear program just happened to advance 50 years during the Clinton Administration? </p>
<p>Although she has plausible deniability, given that she’s a complete idiot and doesn’t recall anything during the eight years she was in the White House, that didn’t reflect just magnificently on her.</p>
<p>NoDonkey on January 13, 2009 at 4:44 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Do you forget she was in the ceremonial role of first lady during the Clinton Presidency? Do you really think she is an idiot? How could an idiot do what you accuse her of without any proof?</p>
<p>I believe there was a chinese scientist who passed on Nuclear secrets to the chineses. Are you blaming her for that?</p>
<p>Are you picking on her because she is a woman? I&#8217;m beginning to wonder. Most people would pick of Bill Clintoon for that maybe but not her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kanda</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/13/pay-for-play-more-hillary-work-for-donors-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-1777833</link>
		<dc:creator>kanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40330#comment-1777833</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Tommy_G on January 13, 2009 at 12:53 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Perhaps she has more credentials than say Condoleeza Rice did when she took over state. I think she was a great senator for NY. Certainly better than John Keyy&#039;s friend Chuckie Schumer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Tommy_G on January 13, 2009 at 12:53 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Perhaps she has more credentials than say Condoleeza Rice did when she took over state. I think she was a great senator for NY. Certainly better than John Keyy&#8217;s friend Chuckie Schumer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoDonkey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/13/pay-for-play-more-hillary-work-for-donors-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-1777832</link>
		<dc:creator>NoDonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40330#comment-1777832</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Seriously, what proof do you have that Hillary passed on military secrets to the Chinese?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That their nuclear program just happened to advance 50 years during the Clinton Administration?  

Although she has plausible deniability, given that she&#039;s a complete idiot and doesn&#039;t recall anything during the eight years she was in the White House, that didn&#039;t reflect just magnificently on her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Seriously, what proof do you have that Hillary passed on military secrets to the Chinese?</p></blockquote>
<p>That their nuclear program just happened to advance 50 years during the Clinton Administration?  </p>
<p>Although she has plausible deniability, given that she&#8217;s a complete idiot and doesn&#8217;t recall anything during the eight years she was in the White House, that didn&#8217;t reflect just magnificently on her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kanda</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/13/pay-for-play-more-hillary-work-for-donors-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-1777814</link>
		<dc:creator>kanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40330#comment-1777814</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I mean, she’s already passed on our military and nuclear secrets to them, think of all the goodwill that’s generated.

NoDonkey on January 13, 2009 at 3:11 PM

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Seriously, what proof do you have that Hillary passed on military secrets to the Chinese?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I mean, she’s already passed on our military and nuclear secrets to them, think of all the goodwill that’s generated.</p>
<p>NoDonkey on January 13, 2009 at 3:11 PM</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Seriously, what proof do you have that Hillary passed on military secrets to the Chinese?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hillary&#8217;s Pay to Play problems continue! Geithner faces question of immigration status of former housekeeper and taxes! &#124; Fire Andrea Mitchell!</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/13/pay-for-play-more-hillary-work-for-donors-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-1777757</link>
		<dc:creator>Hillary&#8217;s Pay to Play problems continue! Geithner faces question of immigration status of former housekeeper and taxes! &#124; Fire Andrea Mitchell!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40330#comment-1777757</guid>
		<description>[...] immigration status of a former housekeeper and whether he paid Social Security and Medicare taxes. And of course theres Billary Hillary Clinton&#8217;s continued pay to play problems coming home to r.... Good ole Billary  Hillary Clinton goes before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee today to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] immigration status of a former housekeeper and whether he paid Social Security and Medicare taxes. And of course theres Billary Hillary Clinton&#8217;s continued pay to play problems coming home to r&#8230;. Good ole Billary  Hillary Clinton goes before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee today to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The CJ Political Report</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/13/pay-for-play-more-hillary-work-for-donors-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-1777501</link>
		<dc:creator>The CJ Political Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40330#comment-1777501</guid>
		<description>I said, &quot;about &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; Obama is correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I said, &#8220;about <em>that</em> Obama is correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoDonkey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/13/pay-for-play-more-hillary-work-for-donors-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-1777407</link>
		<dc:creator>NoDonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40330#comment-1777407</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;especially moneys coming from foreign sources.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

But she has such an incredible relationship with the Chinese Army . . . 

I mean, she&#039;s already passed on our military and nuclear secrets to them, think of all the goodwill that&#039;s generated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>especially moneys coming from foreign sources.</p></blockquote>
<p>But she has such an incredible relationship with the Chinese Army . . . </p>
<p>I mean, she&#8217;s already passed on our military and nuclear secrets to them, think of all the goodwill that&#8217;s generated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onlineanalyst</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/13/pay-for-play-more-hillary-work-for-donors-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-1777348</link>
		<dc:creator>onlineanalyst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40330#comment-1777348</guid>
		<description>Hillary has not served as a senator for eight years, Ed.  For the last two, she has spent her time running for the presidency, just as Obama had done.

Like all of the Dem &lt;em&gt;power players&lt;/em&gt;, Hillary Clinton is bought and paid for.  No Secretary of State candidates should have even a whiff of influence peddling hanging over them, especially moneys coming from foreign sources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary has not served as a senator for eight years, Ed.  For the last two, she has spent her time running for the presidency, just as Obama had done.</p>
<p>Like all of the Dem <em>power players</em>, Hillary Clinton is bought and paid for.  No Secretary of State candidates should have even a whiff of influence peddling hanging over them, especially moneys coming from foreign sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bookman</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/13/pay-for-play-more-hillary-work-for-donors-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-1777336</link>
		<dc:creator>bookman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40330#comment-1777336</guid>
		<description>No, they are not going to give her a hard time, and there is very little chance of her not getting confirmed.  They (the other senators) don&#039;t want her around, either.  This is their best chance to get rid of her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, they are not going to give her a hard time, and there is very little chance of her not getting confirmed.  They (the other senators) don&#8217;t want her around, either.  This is their best chance to get rid of her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoDonkey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/13/pay-for-play-more-hillary-work-for-donors-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-1777194</link>
		<dc:creator>NoDonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40330#comment-1777194</guid>
		<description>Again, why care?  

Democrats won&#039;t investigate Democrats.  

The press won&#039;t investigate Democrats.  

Republican politicians don&#039;t have the guts or the power.  

Democrats can do whatever they please.  It&#039;s the law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, why care?  </p>
<p>Democrats won&#8217;t investigate Democrats.  </p>
<p>The press won&#8217;t investigate Democrats.  </p>
<p>Republican politicians don&#8217;t have the guts or the power.  </p>
<p>Democrats can do whatever they please.  It&#8217;s the law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knucklehead</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/13/pay-for-play-more-hillary-work-for-donors-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-1777106</link>
		<dc:creator>Knucklehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40330#comment-1777106</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The CJ Political Report on January 13, 2009 at 1:11 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Shouldn&#039;t you be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; here?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The CJ Political Report on January 13, 2009 at 1:11 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t you be <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/" rel="nofollow"> here?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomasaur</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/13/pay-for-play-more-hillary-work-for-donors-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-1777016</link>
		<dc:creator>thomasaur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40330#comment-1777016</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The CJ Political Report on January 13, 2009 at 1:11 PM

&lt;/blockquote&gt;BULLSH!T on so many fronts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The CJ Political Report on January 13, 2009 at 1:11 PM</p>
</blockquote>
<p>BULLSH!T on so many fronts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The CJ Political Report</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/13/pay-for-play-more-hillary-work-for-donors-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-1776996</link>
		<dc:creator>The CJ Political Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40330#comment-1776996</guid>
		<description>You can look at this with suspicion, or not. Couldn&#039;t it simply be that Senator Clinton was working for NY, and former President Clinton was going where he needed to go to get money? We can continue in the mood of paranoia and gotcha-style politics of the last many years (going back to the Clinton era), or we can opt to view our public servants through more positive eyes.  Not everything is a conspiracy. No one is perfect. That&#039;s the way it is.  Really, it&#039;s time for a change, about that Obama is correct..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can look at this with suspicion, or not. Couldn&#8217;t it simply be that Senator Clinton was working for NY, and former President Clinton was going where he needed to go to get money? We can continue in the mood of paranoia and gotcha-style politics of the last many years (going back to the Clinton era), or we can opt to view our public servants through more positive eyes.  Not everything is a conspiracy. No one is perfect. That&#8217;s the way it is.  Really, it&#8217;s time for a change, about that Obama is correct..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UltimateBob</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/13/pay-for-play-more-hillary-work-for-donors-exposed/comment-page-1/#comment-1776968</link>
		<dc:creator>UltimateBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=40330#comment-1776968</guid>
		<description>Hillary&#039;s shady past &amp; questionable connections should come as a surprise to no one. After all, remember where she is from?  Hint: it&#039;s &lt;em&gt;NOT&lt;/em&gt; New York, and it&#039;s &lt;em&gt;NOT&lt;/em&gt; Arkansas.

Anyone?
.
.
.
Yep, Illinois! &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Park Ridge&lt;/a&gt;, to be exact, only a few miles from downtown Chicago.

Birds of a feather, as they say.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary&#8217;s shady past &amp; questionable connections should come as a surprise to no one. After all, remember where she is from?  Hint: it&#8217;s <em>NOT</em> New York, and it&#8217;s <em>NOT</em> Arkansas.</p>
<p>Anyone?<br />
.<br />
.<br />
.<br />
Yep, Illinois! <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton" rel="nofollow">Park Ridge</a>, to be exact, only a few miles from downtown Chicago.</p>
<p>Birds of a feather, as they say&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
