Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Eric Massa’s Wild Ride, or It’s Not Easy Being Green (in 4 Cars)

posted at 2:50 pm on January 13, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Tom Lehrer, the Harvard mathematician turned satirist, reportedly retired from the latter profession because politics had become a satire of itself in the 1970s.  Eric Massa, the Congressman from New York’s 29th District, decided to demonstrate Lehrer’s continuing wisdom.  He wanted to promote hydrogen-fueled vehicles as an answer to ending greenhouse-gas emissions, and so planned to drive himself to Washington DC in a GM model for publicity.  However, Massa’s green ride got a big-time boost from two enormous SUVs:

Massa had to be in the nation’s capital Tuesday for his swearing in as the 29th Congressional District’s new representative. He drove the General Motors Equinox prototype car to draw attention to the technology, some of which is being developed in the district.

The problem is the car can go about 150 to 200 miles without a refill, and the trip from Corning to Washington, D.C. is 282 miles. And there are no hydrogen refilling stations along the way.

As a result, Massa had to switch to another GM hydrogen fuel cell vehicle that was standing by in Harrisburg.

So, okay, maybe Massa could have used this to make a point about infrastructure.  We don’t have a hydrogen infrastructure to allow a 282-mile drive, and he could make that a selling point for Barack Obama’s policies for spending money on alternative-energy distribution networks.  However, it makes the better point that alternative-energy vehicles at this stage are inferior to traditionally powered cars for anyone who wants to drive long distances.

But that’s not the end of the story.  Massa only had to travel one way for this trip.  What happened to those cars?

After the trip, both cars were towed back to their original locations by two Chevrolet Tahoe hybrid SUVs.

What?  Not the Chevy Tahoe E85 vehicle that gets a whopping 15 MPG on the highway?  No, this looks like the 2009 hybrid that gets 22 MPG on the highway — when not towing a vehicle behind it.  Hybrid or not, the two SUVs dispersed much more greenhouse gases out their tailpipe than if Massa had just used a run-of-the-mill compact or mid-sized sedan on his one-way trip.  Instead, Massa wound up having to use four cars for a one-way 282-mile trip to DC, thanks to his decision to go green.

Heck, he could have even driven my Honda SUV.  It gets about 25 MPG on the highway even after 85,000 miles and seven years, and it would have made DC easily on one tank of gas.  That would have saved Massa the switch and the two tows for his “green” cars.

Oh, one final point.  The Elmira Star-Gazette plays Name That Party with Massa, failing to mention that he’s a Democrat.  From the story, though, one can easily deduce it.  (via Gizmodo and Famous DC)


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

First…opps…wrong blog

RedSoxNation on January 13, 2009 at 2:56 PM

If I understand it correctly, it’s not entirely fair to say that it was 4 cars. He had 1 car halfway that was towed back to it’s starting point and another car the second half that was towed back to it’s starting point.

Basically, it was 1 round trip journey with different cars doing each leg (and, at times, towing another car) for a man that was only taking a one way trip.

Unless the SUV’s then had to be driven back to their starting locations in which case you add another leg onto the journey….so it would be a round-trip PLUS one-way trip for a guy that was only taking a one-way trip.

*sigh* I’m entirely confused now. Suffice it to say his point (as with most political points) was all show and no substance.

JadeNYU on January 13, 2009 at 3:03 PM

With ideologues, especially of the socialist variety, what matters is the idea, or the ideal. Actually results will vary. To that end, they will sacrifice the earth to save it because what matters is not the end result, but the purity of the idea. To extrapolate this to its furthest reaches, and history has seen this in communist governments, the purity of the ideal must be honored even if it means millions must die. In this case, instead of millions must die, it was gallons must be burned. So for a greenie to drive four cars when one would do, if it was done for the purpose of making an ideological point, is completely kosher in the Red Book.

keep the change on January 13, 2009 at 3:08 PM

Well, now we know whom GM is “in the tank” for….

unclesmrgol on January 13, 2009 at 3:09 PM

But, gee, he meant well! O gosh don’t you see his good intentions? Never mind his execution was a little flawed, his touchy/feely attitudes were right. THAT’S EXACTLY WHAT IS WRONG WITH THE WHOLE LEFT MOVEMENT. THEY CONVINCE US THAT THEIR HEARTS ARE RIGHT AND THEN THEY RUN THE COUNTRY DOWN THE TUBES! WHEN WILL AMERICA GET IT???

Christian Conservative on January 13, 2009 at 3:11 PM

…And all this idiocy proved just what, exactly?

That ninnies overrun the Earth? Knew that already!

heldmyw on January 13, 2009 at 3:11 PM

Unless he’s using nuclear to create electricity in order to crack water, his hydrogen car produces more CO2 than does my Saturn.

MarkTheGreat on January 13, 2009 at 3:12 PM

Symbolism over substance…again. The Birkenstock and Granola crowd looks at this and are overcome with orgasmic waves that there’s someone that “cares” about the environment as much as they do…regardless of the real impact.

Wyznowski on January 13, 2009 at 3:14 PM

Typical! It reminds me of the times I’ve seen these unbathed lefty enviro-hippies protesting and chastising those that drive gass-guzzling SUV’s only to drive away in a 60’s era VW van that probably gets about the same gas mileage (or worse) but spews out more carbon dioxide in one mile than a newer SUV would spew in 20 miles!

Just another example of the illogical and idiotic thinking of the left! I think some organization should do a study comparing a lefties thought process with a righties thought process, I’m certain they will find that leftie thought processes are defective compared to those on the right!

Morons!

Liberty or Death on January 13, 2009 at 3:17 PM

JadeNYU on January 13, 2009 at 3:03 PM

Sounds like a nightmare story problem.

“If one useless hydrogen car departs one of NY’s gerrymandered congressional districts at 8am, and peters out in Harrisburg, where another useless hydrogen car is waiting to go into DC, and both cars are towed back using SUVs, how many tears does Al Gore cry because of the resulting carbon footprint?”

GoHskrs on January 13, 2009 at 3:19 PM

I guess the Change was that EVERY action in Washington is now for theater.

Good times.

My diesel F-350 gets 18 MPG not towing and it only goes down to 14 MPG while towing my camper which is a lot heavier than his hydro-mobile. Plus it can run on bio-diesel, a much better green option. They can make bio-diesel from algae that they feed CO2, so suck on that Algore.

kirkill on January 13, 2009 at 3:21 PM

I think some organization should do a study comparing a lefties thought process with a righties thought process, I’m certain they will find that leftie thought processes are defective compared to those on the right!

Morons!

Liberty or Death on January 13, 2009 at 3:17 PM

She has, and her name is Ann Coulter.

kirkill on January 13, 2009 at 3:24 PM

If I understand it correctly, it’s not entirely fair to say that it was 4 cars. He had 1 car halfway that was towed back to it’s starting point and another car the second half that was towed back to it’s starting point.

Basically, it was 1 round trip journey with different cars doing each leg (and, at times, towing another car) for a man that was only taking a one way trip.

Unless the SUV’s then had to be driven back to their starting locations in which case you add another leg onto the journey….so it would be a round-trip PLUS one-way trip for a guy that was only taking a one-way trip.

*sigh* I’m entirely confused now. Suffice it to say his point (as with most political points) was all show and no substance.

JadeNYU on January 13, 2009 at 3:03 PM

Except you also have to factor in – how did that second car get to where it was waiting for him in the first place? Did they also have to tow it from his starting point to where it awaited him? And how did those Tahoe’s get to the places where they had to toe from? Did they drive behind him the whole way, one of them stopping halfway to tow a car and the other going the whole distance and then towing back the whole distance? He would have been better off in one of those F250s that get around 8mpg.

Kelligan on January 13, 2009 at 3:24 PM

Ed,

from your writing it appears you are buying into the global warming theory. Who cares about greenhouse gases?

unseen on January 13, 2009 at 3:24 PM

unseen on January 13, 2009 at 3:24 PM

I think he’s just highlighting the absurdity of involving 4 vehicles in this trip to make a “green” point.

cs89 on January 13, 2009 at 3:27 PM

And that picture looks like a Ford Escape. Is that what he really drove?

Kelligan on January 13, 2009 at 3:27 PM

The problem is the car can go about 150 to 200 miles without a refill

Thiat is a major problem. That is half the range of any gasoline or diesel powered vehicle.

Vashta.Nerada on January 13, 2009 at 3:29 PM

Someone has to calculate the amount of carbon this guy used up…first two cars…but someone had to get the other car for the second leg…then the towing back of the two cars.
This is what happens when Gov. takes over.

right2bright on January 13, 2009 at 3:31 PM

Instead, Massa wound up having to use four cars for a one-way 282-mile trip to DC, thanks to his decision to go green.

And, that would be a problem, why?

Genius!

juanito on January 13, 2009 at 3:33 PM

I’m all for HFC vehicles. What better way to stick it to the terrorists than to start driving cars that run on the most common element in the universe? This hybrid crap is just prolonging the inevitable and keeps funding our enemies in the meantime. There was no hybrid between the automobile and the horse-drawn carriage, so why should there be hybrids today?

You’re right, Ed, the story should be about infrastructure. I was hoping the SUV’s had been carrying hydrogen to refuel the vehicle along the way but leave it to a Dem to concentrate on intent at the expense of execution.

Kafir on January 13, 2009 at 3:38 PM

How do you fill up a Hydrogen tank anyway? It’s going to be in gas form anywhere you find it on earth and in that form it will just float away because it’s too light. Do you have to physically put in a tank or something? Sounds tedious.

Kelligan on January 13, 2009 at 3:40 PM

Maybe he could have put that effort into getting us mass transportation. It is a shame the east coast doesn’t have a rail system, maybe with a station on the Capitol building’s doorstep. Yeah, that would be nice.

Laura in Maryland on January 13, 2009 at 3:41 PM

Atlas has definitely shrugged.

Neo on January 13, 2009 at 3:49 PM

Ed,

from your writing it appears you are buying into the global warming theory. Who cares about greenhouse gases?

Quite.

Climate change is a bankrupt philosophy co-opted by leftist ideologues for their own purposes which have little to do with science.

Ares on January 13, 2009 at 3:59 PM

The problem is the car can go about 150 to 200 miles without a refill

That is a major problem. That is half the range of any gasoline or diesel powered vehicle.

Vashta.Nerada on January 13, 2009 at 3:29 PM

That is typical for hydrogen powered vehicles. The big problem is the fuel storage tank. Hydrogen has to be compressed to 3600 psi to be able to be contained in a vessel (tank) small enough to fit in the vehicle. Even then the tank likely takes up most of the trunk space. So you have a vehicle that gets half the range using a tank that takes up 3 times the space as a gasoline tank, and also has the problem of 3600 psi tank pressure which might be kind of exciting in a collision.

Dasher on January 13, 2009 at 4:19 PM

How do you fill up a Hydrogen tank anyway? It’s going to be in gas form anywhere you find it on earth and in that form it will just float away because it’s too light. Do you have to physically put in a tank or something? Sounds tedious.

Kelligan on January 13, 2009 at 3:40 PM

This problem, like so many others, was solved during the Civil War. Note the lack of horses — one of the wonders of hydrogen technology.

unclesmrgol on January 13, 2009 at 4:24 PM

Onion Parody?

rob verdi on January 13, 2009 at 4:30 PM

That is typical for hydrogen powered vehicles. The big problem is the fuel storage tank.

Dasher on January 13, 2009 at 4:19 PM

It’s a killer. Some places you can get away with that kind of range, but not west of the Mississippi. Out here a trip to grandma’s is a couple of hundred miles each way, and she is 40 miles from the nearest town.

Vashta.Nerada on January 13, 2009 at 4:33 PM

Hey I’m from the 29th district…Rochester, NY! Don’t know all that much about Massa to be honest though…but this is a great start!

bagadeez04 on January 13, 2009 at 5:17 PM

Laura are you being sarcastic? I mean I was in the northeast for the past year and they have the Amtrack Downeaster route in Boston that goes all the way to D.C.

Of course mass transit doesn’t make a difference at all. There are still tons of cars on the roads in Boston and New York. I’m from the Columbus Ohio area and after being in the northeast for a year I came back and realized that traffic here is nothing compared to up there.

MobileVideoEngineer on January 13, 2009 at 5:19 PM

Laura are you being sarcastic? I mean I was in the northeast for the past year and they have the Amtrack Downeaster route in Boston that goes all the way to D.C.

Very sarcastic, and if memory serves, (I usually take the Metro and not the MARC train) Union station is a quick walk to the Capitol Building.

Laura in Maryland on January 13, 2009 at 5:37 PM

*sigh* I’m entirely confused now. Suffice it to say his point (as with most political points) was all show and no substance.

JadeNYU on January 13, 2009 at 3:03 PM

You nailed it Jade! That’s liberalism at its very core!

gryphon202 on January 13, 2009 at 5:58 PM

Heck, he could have even driven my Honda SUV. It gets about 25 MPG on the highway even after 85,000 miles and seven years, and it would have made DC easily on one tank of gas.

I have gotten 39 MPG on my toyota corolla driving strictly on the highway going 75-80 mph. Mixed commute driving I average 32-35 MPG. 10 gallons of gas could have gotten him there and halfway back!

PrettyD_Vicious on January 13, 2009 at 6:30 PM

the link does indicate that he made a case for improving infrastructure – was that not originally there, or did Ed miss it?

Midas on January 13, 2009 at 8:04 PM

If he really wanted to impress, he could have taken a effing greyhound bus, and saved a ton of fuel! I guess we should just be pleased as crap that he didn’t take a private jet like Al Gore.

4shoes on January 13, 2009 at 9:24 PM

Atlas Shrugged comes to life.

You can’t make this cr@p up … Name that Party, indeed.

Let’s roll.

ex-Democrat on January 13, 2009 at 9:40 PM

First…opps…wrong blog

RedSoxNation
____

Are you an Aintitcool guy?

Warner Todd Huston on January 14, 2009 at 12:37 AM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.