Burris did oppo research work for Blago
posted at 10:11 am on January 12, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Roland Burris will likely get his Senate seat this week, but his argument that he didn’t have many ties to Governor Rod Blagojevich looks less likely to survive. The Chicago Tribune reports today that Burris developed opposition research for Blagojevich’s re-election campaign in 2006, making him much closer to the now-impeached governor than Burris wanted to admit:
Just days after Gov. Rod Blagojevich accepted his party’s nod for re-election in 2006, a letter arrived at state Treasurer Judy Baar Topinka’s office seeking thousands of pages of documents Blagojevich could use as ammunition against her in their upcoming campaign.
The letter was signed by Roland Burris.
It was one of several requests Burris made to the treasurer’s office in 2006, a campaign practice known as opposition research in which candidates use public documents to question their opponents’ records.
Burris’ assistance for his fellow Democrat would typically draw little notice. But it comes to light as he is seeking to project his political independence from the scandal-plagued governor who appointed him to the U.S. Senate on Dec. 31.
Burris wants people to believe that he and Blagojevich have a rivalry rather than a friendship and political alliance, mostly to put some distance between himself and Blagojevich’s ethics woes and alleged criminal behavior. That simply won’t fly, especially with this new reporting. There is nothing inherently wrong in oppo research, but politicians don’t do it for their rivals — they do it for their allies. Burris’ attempts to paint himself as anything but an ally only reveal his own dishonesty and slipperiness.
It makes little difference, however. Blagojevich appointed Burris, and now with Jesse White agreeing to sign the certification, the Senate has no choice but to seat Burris:
U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said Sunday it was likely that former Illinois Atty. Gen. Roland Burris would be seated as the state’s newest senator this week after a legal review of new paperwork regarding the Senate appointment.
The review Monday by Senate legal counsel marks the latest twist in the on-again, off-again seating of Burris, who was appointed by Gov. Rod Blagojevich three weeks after the now-impeached Illinois governor was arrested on federal corruption charges that include allegations he attempted to sell the Senate seat vacated by President-elect Barack Obama. While it appeared the Senate was closer Sunday to seating Burris, there are potential hitches. …
Durbin said on CBS’ “Face the Nation” that it was “point-blank” wrong to think the Senate would await Blagojevich’s removal to keep Burris from being seated.
“To wait until Gov. Blagojevich is removed could be a matter of weeks,” Durbin said. “I think Roland Burris’ future and fate will be decided before then.”
Unless the Senate gets evidence that Burris bought the appointment from Blagojevich, they have no standing to refuse his appointment. White gave them a technicality for delay, but in the end the Illinois Secretary of State agreed to sign the certification the Senate requires. They have no more excuses, and now must eat crow as Blagojevich successfully called Harry Reid’s massive bluff.
The Illinois legislature could have prevented this by requiring a special election to fill Senate terms following the death or resignation of an elected Senator. They punted on the question, hoping to hold off the possibility that a Republican could take advantage of Democratic corruption and win the seat. Michael Madigan, Illinois House speaker, offered this lame rationalization for their failure:
Though Blagojevich had said he would sign special election legislation, Madigan said the governor, whom he labeled “delusional,” couldn’t be trusted.
“I think that had a bill gone to the governor’s desk providing for a special election, Blagojevich would have vetoed the bill, made his appointment and then there’d be a matter of a motion to override in the legislature. But the appointment would have been made,” Madigan (D-Chicago) said on WGN-AM 720.
That certainly sounds … convenient. Let’s not pressure the Governor to keep his word — let’s let him off the hook entirely. Is that what Madigan wants Illinoisians to believe that the Democratic leadership in the legislature strategized? Under those circumstances, the legislature had even more incentive to act, if for no other reason but to distance themselves from Blagojevich and to make his perfidy even more clear.
Illinois Democrats have given a pretty clear demonstration of why they can’t be trusted with power. Will Illinois Republicans organize effectively to give voters a real choice in 2010?
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
Sweet
Vashta.Nerada on January 12, 2009 at 10:17 AM
That’s what friends are for…
Mr. Joe on January 12, 2009 at 10:18 AM
It’s doubtful. When was the last time Republicans organized effectively for anything?
t.ferg on January 12, 2009 at 10:23 AM
Did anyone really expect a politician from Chicago to quietly go away? Obama was shown to consort with racist pastors, anti-American terrorists and home grown terrorists but was never shamed enough to quit. They deserve each other but we sure as hell don’t deserve them.
Jvette on January 12, 2009 at 10:28 AM
Oy!
They could have put forth legislation to strip Blago of his power of appointment which would have forced a special election.
Madigan is a tool. If Reid and Durbin used the lack of SecState’s signature on the appointment document to keep Burris out, the “motion to override” certainly would have had more teeth.
yo on January 12, 2009 at 10:28 AM
No, don’t be silly. The Illinois Democrats are a RICO operation – they are organized crime.
The Illinois GOP is just a rumor.
Jaibones on January 12, 2009 at 10:29 AM
Well, it’s good that none of this could possibly have touched Obama.
Because that would be a distraction.
NoDonkey on January 12, 2009 at 10:31 AM
The family tree sure doesn’t fork a lot with democrap politicians does it???
bullseye on January 12, 2009 at 10:32 AM
I’m all for seating him. It will raise the overall level of present Senatorial integrity, trustworthiness, and sense of public service. Al Franken will also help in this regard.
a capella on January 12, 2009 at 10:39 AM
Corruption has been a legacy in Illinois politics since before Al Capone.
It is wonderful that Barack Obama has emerged undefiled from his extensive Illinois political background. What a remarkable leader he is! /sarc off
kingsjester on January 12, 2009 at 10:39 AM
In the last Gubernatorial election the Republicans in Illinois did an exhaustive search to find the only candidate who couldn’t beat Blagovich. Kind of the the RNC did for president last year.
Tommy_G on January 12, 2009 at 10:44 AM
He’s a cuddly golden retriever among pit bulls, a soaring eagle among vultures, a Robin Hood among thieves, a kitten among cobras and a Heineken among Old Styles.
It truly is a miracle.
NoDonkey on January 12, 2009 at 10:54 AM
I’ve never known the Illinois Republicans to do anything effectively.
fiscallyconservative on January 12, 2009 at 10:58 AM
Illinois Republicans seem to have “losing elections” nailed down pretty good.
NoDonkey on January 12, 2009 at 11:34 AM
Sigh….it has been quite some time hasn’t it?
Tim Zank on January 12, 2009 at 11:38 AM
It’s rather amusing to see ol’ “Give ‘em hell Harry” in over his head, dealing with these Chi-town thugs.
franksalterego on January 12, 2009 at 11:43 AM
Exit Question:
Exit Answer:
Given the long and storied history of Daley-ite corruption in Chicago politics, probably not.
gryphon202 on January 12, 2009 at 11:53 AM
Ed, there is only one party in IL. John Kass from the Chicago Tribune long ago gave that party it’s name, the IL Combine. The IL GOP and IL Dems are flip sides of the same coin. Expect nothing from the IL GOP but the same corruption as the Dems.
kbfntc on January 12, 2009 at 12:06 PM
Where is Al Capone when you really need him?
Johan Klaus on January 12, 2009 at 12:13 PM
Blago is innocent till proven guilty…Blago is the governor, the innocent governor, so he can and did appoint the Senator.
right2bright on January 12, 2009 at 12:58 PM
Let me guess,Burris lives in Obama’s
vast neighborhood!
canopfor on January 12, 2009 at 2:16 PM
Where is Al Capone when you really need him?
Johan Klaus on Jan 12,2009 at 12:13PM.
Johan Klaus:Hehe,yup,I’ll raise you one,where the h#ll
is Elliot Ness,and the G-Men?:)
canopfor on January 12, 2009 at 2:21 PM
As spoken by a rare brave IL state senator this morning, “How many legislators who vote to impeach will have relatives on the state payroll?”
Patronage is not illegal. Horse trading is not illegal. I expect that every politician I would vote for (I voted for Blago – over the sorry Republican alternative, JBT) engages in patronage and horse trading in representing me at the federal, state, county or municipal level. Like pork, the definition of patronage is relative. Pun intended.
A vote to impeach Blago, without ANY evidence from Fitzgerald, is hypocritical at best. More likely, the impeachment voter is a legislator hoping to cover his or her tracks by offering up a scape goat to the media.
Angry Dumbo on January 12, 2009 at 3:00 PM
I’m still thinking. :)
Branch Rickey on January 12, 2009 at 7:09 PM
I feel for you!
Branch Rickey on January 12, 2009 at 7:11 PM
Obama’s stonewalling and self vindication on the Senate appointment scandal worked. He’s out of the fray. The Washington based hub bub now stars Reid and not him. Is Rahm back from Africa yet? Why haven’t we heard from/about him?
Mason on January 12, 2009 at 9:52 PM
Comment pages: