Gaza not unlike a big concentration camp, says top Vatican official
posted at 3:34 pm on January 8, 2009 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | regular view
Not just repulsive but gutless, since he leaves us to guess which side he thinks wears the swastika. Even to venture a Holocaust analogy under the circumstances is a supreme insult, of course, but he’ll get away with it because he gets to hide behind the cross.
Absolute moral authority, you see.
Cardinal Martino expressed concern over the humanitarian situation, saying “Let’s look at the conditions in Gaza: these increasingly resemble a big concentration camp.”
He added: “Defenceless populations are always the ones who pay.”
The Israeli Foreign Ministry said that this amounted to “Hamas propaganda”, and accused the cardinal of ignoring Hamas’s “numerous crimes”. “This does not bring the people closer to truth and peace,” it said.
The Simon Wiesenthal Centre, which monitors anti-Semitism and tracks down Nazi war criminals, attacked Cardinal Martino for making remarks that were “untrue, distort the memory of the Holocaust and are only used against Israel by terrorist organizations and Holocaust deniers”.
Rabbi Marvin Hier, dean of the centre, said: “The cardinal should know that however difficult conditions may be in Gaza, the one thing it surely is not is a concentration camp where Jews were brought to die either by slave labour, starvation, or in most cases burned in the crematorium.”
Surely not, but as Hier himself noted elsewhere today, the rules for Israel are different. I wonder, if Gaza’s just Dachau by another name, why’s the AP running reminiscences by its reporters of how life used to be before the bombing started? (“Al Dera, a beautiful hotel on the Mediterranean shore, was a place where young men and women smoked water pipes and flirted, and where families went for dinner on Thursdays.”) Are there similarly wistful recollections in the archives at Yad Vashem that I’m not aware of? “The Buchenwald I Knew”?
I’ll spare you the atheist boilerplate about how unrealistic the Christian approach to conflict resolution is here (“violence, wherever it comes from and whatever form it takes, must be firmly condemned”) and remind you that there’s politics afoot as well. Benedict has his own strategy for engaging with Muslims, and alienating them by supporting Israel against eliminationist scum like Hamas only complicates it. His “peace at all costs” agenda also makes him a potentially valuable useful idiot for fundamentalists too, a fact that hasn’t escaped Iran’s attention. Given their interest in Gaza, who knows if they haven’t already leaned on him to be scrupulously “evenhanded” in his statements. Ironic in Martino’s case if so, considering how highly nuanced indeed is Iran’s view of the Holocaust.
Tough day for Israel, though. First the Vatican comes down on them, then the world’s Ultimate Moral Authority hails Hamas’s weapons tunnels as “defensive.” What’s next, a statement from St. Barack deploring the “cycle of violence”? Exit question: Should Israel cancel the pope’s visit?
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
Benedict was 6 years old when the Nazis came to power. At age 14 he was required to join the Hitler Jugend. He’s hardly the party member you are trying to obliquely paint him.
As far as Pius, he ordered the Churches in Italy and Italian diplomats to hide/help Jews. I know a number of people who are alive to day because their parents were hid in convents by nuns in France. I believe the complaint is that Pius should have done more. However, I hear ad nauseum arguments about how the zionists should have done more, too, a position I don’t agree with.
So, there you have it: Everybody hates everybody.
Blake on January 8, 2009 at 4:31 PM
Unfortunately, whenever Israel rolls in with tanks, it gives Hamas or whoever a handy excuse for hardships that the people who live there are very likely to believe. As someone said a few comments up, this is not a job for tanks.
Big S on January 8, 2009 at 4:31 PM
Are people who cheer for Hamas and who choose to hide weapons in their homes innocents? Are people who choose martyrdom for their children free from balme for their deaths? When a mosque becomes a munitions dump is it still unfair to blow it up?
clnurnberg on January 8, 2009 at 4:32 PM
Some people will find an excuse no matter what the circumstances. You appear to be one of them. The purpose of the war is to stop the rocket and mortar attacks and to destroy weapon stashes and tunnels used to smuggle in more weapons. Tanks are great for that.
Blake on January 8, 2009 at 4:34 PM
Just because something’s been done by others doesn’t justify it. Also: “removing” the Palestinian population from the West Bank and Gaza, by any means, would bring about a response from other nations that are enemies of Israel. They would be justified in responding, too.
You don’t just go and “remove” four million people from an area.
Big S on January 8, 2009 at 4:34 PM
Ask the Vatican to open their vault, especially the section from WWII – it w/b really ugly. They should not be allowed to speak on topic, until they do. This immunity is shameful and they are hypocrits of the first degree.
Entelechy on January 8, 2009 at 4:35 PM
Taking out huge quantities of “rockets”/bombs is not a commando operation. Sorry. And the Hamas charter essentially reads “death to Israel”. The tanks will not make them hate Israel more than they do now, but they may keep Israelis safe and show the world that jews will not quietly accpet their own deaths to prevent harm to the perpetrators and their heavily veiled cheerleading squads.
clnurnberg on January 8, 2009 at 4:35 PM
The idea is to give them fewer excuses. Hasn’t anyone learned anything from the past eight years we’ve spent in the Middle East?
Big S on January 8, 2009 at 4:36 PM
People need to accept the fact that the Vatican got out of the business of sanctioning wars a long time ago. Don’t expect the Pope to throw his support behind any armed conflict, regardless of how “good” the war is.
BohicaTwentyTwo on January 8, 2009 at 4:36 PM
The war has lasted two weeks now? There have been around 700 deaths, a quarter of which are civilians. That is extremely low. You are going to have civilian deaths no matter what. Israel has gone beyond the call of duty to try to keep them to a minimum. Enough with the phony innocent civilian meme.
Blake on January 8, 2009 at 4:36 PM
What are you inferring there, Ent?
JetBoy on January 8, 2009 at 4:37 PM
In context, the Pontiffs comment may actually reflect a truth not witnessed by many – HAMAS the SS of Gaza:
ISLAM DELENDE EST
LAN ASTASLEM
heroyalwhyness on January 8, 2009 at 4:37 PM
Bingo. It’s not like the Vatican is supporting Hamas…the Church’s official position is only against war. Not surprising.
JetBoy on January 8, 2009 at 4:38 PM
Oh, b.s.! They and you want to deny Israel’s right to defend itself. In the past 8 years, we have learned that there are too many anti-Semites in the world.
Blake on January 8, 2009 at 4:39 PM
Supposedly no one will let these people leave and they constantly bring war to their front porch. I often think killing them is humane.
But what do I know. I’m just a Christian who gets to hide behind the cross.
Esthier on January 8, 2009 at 4:39 PM
Sadly, he’s right. I would have used the word “ghetto”, but the idea’s there.
unclesmrgol on January 8, 2009 at 4:41 PM
Sad, if true. Not defending and promoting righteousness and goodness is sinful.
JiangxiDad on January 8, 2009 at 4:42 PM
Sad if the Vatican can’t decide who’s right and who’s wrong. Aren’t they in the making moral judgments business?
JiangxiDad on January 8, 2009 at 4:43 PM
You asked HOW it would be done, not about the justifications (and security considerations are the only justification that Israel needs). But it’s nice to see you excuse everyone else and then come down hard on Israel for trying to survive.
LOL. Different from what they’ve been doig for the past century? Do you think before you write these things?
Aha. Now you’ve found something that is “justified” in your skewed eyes.
If they threaten your existence you certainly do. And the 4 million number is a joke. You’re working on some side propaganda here. Multi-tasking, I see. Meanwhile, Kuwait kicked out 400,000 in a couple of days. But, back then, you were probably too busy complaining about Israel having temporarily kicked out 212 Hamas members to Lebanon to have noticed the Kuwaiti ejections. Despicable.
progressoverpeace on January 8, 2009 at 4:43 PM
I’m not denying their right to defend themselves. I’m just saying that certain techniques used in self-defense might be somewhat counterproductive. How many years did we spend “winning” the war in Iraq (esp. Anbar and Baghdad) before we figured out that we had to change strategies? Did that change mean that we were giving up our right to defend ourselves? No!
Big S on January 8, 2009 at 4:44 PM
And that strategy was the surge and a show of over powering force. You’re whining about the IDF using tanks, for crissakes. You consistently apply a double standard to Israel.
Blake on January 8, 2009 at 4:47 PM
I doubt if the Israel=Nazi crowd would cry a river if the jews were “removed” from the region. Or if they did it would be after the deportationa dn deaths and they would say “But we had no idea” and proclaim themselves righteous and holy for condemning anothet 6 million murders. And make no mistake this is what Hamas and many other muslim groups want.
clnurnberg on January 8, 2009 at 4:47 PM
If you think the surge was just about overpowering force, you’re sorely deluded. I suggest reviewing Gen. Petraeus’ statements from the past couple of years.
Big S on January 8, 2009 at 4:49 PM
Oh, can it! You are arguing that there should have not been a ground incursion into Gaza. You are the one deluded.
Blake on January 8, 2009 at 4:57 PM
You are the f-ckin’ king of double standards. You’d rather have Israel loose soldiers than roll tanks? F you. Let the arabs die defending their wretched and festering sh-thole. Civilians or not. That’s war.
Andy in Agoura Hills on January 8, 2009 at 4:57 PM
This is based on what exactly ? The brainwashing media chorus who serially whitewashes the scum who built an underground rocket city, who is armed to the teeth with Katushas and other crap, puts launchers under a child’s bed and in Hospitals and bombards kindergartens for days on end. These creeps live the way they chose and like to live – they love chaos and they got chaos. Go sing your terrorist sympathizer song elsewhere.
runner on January 8, 2009 at 5:02 PM
In praise of harsh response
Past experience shows disproportional response to terror acts as a key for victory…
Blake on January 8, 2009 at 5:06 PM
A lot of hate there, cowboy.
Let’s just think about the bolded part here for a second: the use (and risk) of more troops allows for more precise operations. That’s exactly the risk we took in implementing the surge. When we stopped rolling over whole towns to chase insurgents, we were better able to indicate who it was we were after. If you recall, there was a huge controversy over whether we were simply putting more troops in harms way, and casualties did increase at first.
Big S on January 8, 2009 at 5:10 PM
Gaza IS a concentration camp but it’s of their own making. The Vatican is just giving the obligatory “can’t we all just get along” rhetoric so hippies don’t complain that they’re blind to the plight of fellow man or some crap like that.
Darth Executor on January 8, 2009 at 5:15 PM
So, Big S, what war college did you graduate from and how many armed conflicts have you planned and participated in?
It never ceases to amaze me that people with absolutely no qualifications, see themselves as some super tactician in the art of war. lol!
Blake on January 8, 2009 at 5:15 PM
Given the shameful legacy of Pius XII and the Catholic priests and curia during the Holocaust, maybe Pope Benedict should stick to apolitical platitudes. His German background doesn’t weear well in this, either.
Cicero43 on January 8, 2009 at 5:15 PM
I think the moral judgement being made here is that ALL war is bad. It may be naive and you may not agree with it, but it is a moral judgement. Frankly, I think if all religons got out of the practice of advocating war, the world would be better off.
BohicaTwentyTwo on January 8, 2009 at 5:24 PM
Albert Einstein:
Golda Meir:
Myriam Zolli:
[Myriam Zolli is the daughter of Israel Zolli, once chief Rabbi of Rome, who (along with her father) converted after the war.]
Adolf Eichmann:
Faint praise from those who don’t want to give it to him.
unclesmrgol on January 8, 2009 at 5:25 PM
Christianity is not Islam. It is not a monolithic religion. There is a lot of dispute about many things, including conflict resolution on the national level.
There are many, many good Christians that believe that you should turn the other cheek to your neighbor, and exterminate evil with extreme prejudice.
While athiests would love to claim this as some kind of congitive dissonance, the reality is that the rules apply differently when you’re talking about an individual, or the state.
And the Catholic church lacks any moral authority vis-a-vis nazism and/or holocausts. So there’s that.
Sure, standing up to the fascists might’ve gotten the Pope or a bunch of Catholics killed. But cowardice in the face of evil isn’t a Christian trait at any level, individual or national.
apollyonbob on January 8, 2009 at 5:26 PM
Correction. The Pope didn’t make the controversial statement. It was one of the Cardinals. It looks like Allahpundit has done a fine job of spreading this newest lie about the Church.
MedSchoolCatholic on January 8, 2009 at 5:26 PM
Oh yeah, if concentration camps launch thousands of missiles every year or harbor suicide bomb factories or smuggle terrorists to kill for religious reasons, sure why not.
The truth is if Gaza is a concentration camp the Palestinians are who built it and its they who have incarcerated themselves.
Speakup on January 8, 2009 at 5:27 PM
Top Vatican Official is not the same as saying the Pope.
Blake on January 8, 2009 at 5:29 PM
We all remember how violently the Church spoke out against actual concentration camps before WWII. Oh, wait…
chunderroad on January 8, 2009 at 5:30 PM
(“violence, wherever it comes from and whatever form it takes, must be firmly condemned”)
Thats ridiculous. That can not possibly be the christian approach. We are not Jesus Christ. God expects us to defend the innocent as well as ourselves. That to me is the christian thing.
Dritanian on January 8, 2009 at 5:31 PM
Pardon my French, but f*** the Catholic Church.
ProfessorMiao on January 8, 2009 at 5:32 PM
I love the Church, but sometimes I wish the Vatican weren’t in Europe.
AbaddonsReign on January 8, 2009 at 5:46 PM
The issue is not that Pius did nothing but whether he could/should have done more.
Blake on January 8, 2009 at 5:59 PM
This chump makes me ill.
When did Jimmuh become pope??
omnipotent on January 8, 2009 at 6:05 PM
I feel that the picture posted with this story is very unfortunate and misleading. The Pope, according to the snippet, was NOT the one making the comments. It is well known that many of the cardinals and bishops surrounding the Pope are pacifists in the extreme. While true that the Catholic church frowns on ANY war at all, it has been unclear, at least to me, whether the church will accept war as just or necessary under any circumstances. The headline picture for this post though was a poor choice in my opinion.
KickandSwimMom on January 8, 2009 at 6:19 PM
this is a continuation of anti-semitism that has plagued christianity for millenia…it seems only the ‘crazed’ fundamentalist protestants (pentecostals, etc) who actually believe the Bible’s prophecies are literal, are not anti-semitic…and this of course does not include the ‘kingdom now’ types who are mostly anti-semitic…
right4life on January 8, 2009 at 6:20 PM
If the good cardinal is really concerned he should convince Hamas to lay down their weapons and cease in their activities to harm Israel; then the whole region will thrive. If somehow he were to convince Israel to lay down their weapons we would have a bloodbath similar to a “real” concentration camp.
DL13 on January 8, 2009 at 6:32 PM
Forget about what the Vatican says. The real Pope is ready to talk to Hamas.
Entelechy on January 8, 2009 at 7:01 PM
ProfessorMiao, stay classy.
crabtree on January 8, 2009 at 7:37 PM
The Pope is absolutely right about this.
What geopolitical israel is doing is committing genocide.
They rounded up all the palestinian Christians and muslims and innocent children into a ghetto and are now indiscriminately bombing one of the most densely populated areas in the world. They are bombing full HOSPITALS, SCHOOLS and mosques.
The collateral damage is huge.
How would you feel if it was your innocent children that were getting blown to bits by the war crimes of geopolitical israel.
For all you protestants who hold the heretical doctrine of dispensationalism and support geopolitical israels murders…you should be ashamed of yourself.
It is absolutely un-Christian to support injustice, murder and genocide.
SaintOlaf on January 8, 2009 at 7:50 PM
First of all, we must agree on what the word genocide actually means. As far as I recall, it means the systematic elimination of an ethnic or religious group.
What race or religion is “geopolitical” Israel systematically eliminating? Arabs? 1.3 million Arabs live well in Israel, and Israel has peace treaties and diplomatic contacts with Arab states. Or is Israel eliminating all muslims? Again, many Arab Israelis are muslims. Furthermore, they specifically target Hamas with precision weapons, which makes the claim to genocide patently absurd.
Now that we have established that you don’t understand what the word genocide means, let us go to the matter of schools and hospitals. International law clearly states that civilian infrastructure being used for military purposes is NOT protected. Hamas is the party that is violating international law by 1) not displaying clear insignia and 2) using civilians as shields.
Now the matter of Gaza being a Ghetto… The Arabs and the UN built the refugee camps! When Egypt annexed Gaza and Transjordan annexed Cis-jordanie in 49, instead of treating the Arabs there as normal citizens and allowing them freedom of movement, they built camps to keep them there so as to use them as anchors against Israel. Israel did NOT build them.
As for how un-Christian it is to support injustice, murder and genocide, I’ll just say that you have to be fucking kidding me. Should I actually give you a list of every act of injustice, murder and genocide by the Catholic Church and it’s Princes? Furthermore, your talk of heretics is all the more proof that you’re insane. What are your plans for tonight, maybe a few witch-burnings? Maybe attend an ODESSA meeting?
ebrawer on January 8, 2009 at 8:29 PM
Marvin Hier says that Pius was “silent”. Do you agree with him?
What the Pope did was to learn from the Edith Stein incident, which was that, whenever the clergy spoke, they weren’t the ones killed or punished — their parishioners were. In the case of Edith Stein, there was supposed to be a day of solidarity in the Netherlands, where from every pulpit (both Catholic and Lutheran), condemnation of the Nazi pogram would be issued. Interestingly, when the day came, the condemnation came from Catholic pulpits, but not from Lutheran ones. As a result, the Germans ordered as an example all Jewish converts to Catholicism rounded up and deported; Edith Stein was amongst them. No priests were harmed in this atrocity.
Would you speak out, knowing that your opponent would kill, not you, but your spouse and children? For a priest, his parishioners are like his spouse and children. This was designed to silence clerical dissent, and it was “successful” to the extent that opposition went underground.
The Pope did speak out, privately. When the Hungarian bishops indicated that they liked the Nazis and what the Nazis intended for the Jews, the Pope sent a nuncio to them and made them toe his line. I quoted Adolf Eichmann to give a sense of what the Nazis thought of this Pope. I quoted two prominent Jews to give a sense of what they thought of Pius. And, finally, a quote from someone who was there in Rome during the time the Nazis were rounding up Jews to give a sense of what they thought was happening.
The “silent pope” meme was something thought up by an anti-Catholic German Protestant and put into a play — none of the Pope’s contemporaries thought him silent or inactive.
This Pope isn’t being silent or inactive either. His underlings slightly overstate things when they speak of Gaza as a concentration camp, but they would be absolutely correct if they called it a ghetto — a place where the people whose property you have taken are put to languish in poverty.
unclesmrgol on January 8, 2009 at 8:32 PM
I must have been napping when my history teacher discussed Dachau’s Jewish residents launching rockets at German civilians.
agmartin on January 8, 2009 at 8:50 PM
Please don’t quote me and then pretend you are being responsive and/or rebutting what I said.
And don’t take my failure to address what you wrote as acquiescence. I think it’s b.s. but have too much work to do.
Blake on January 8, 2009 at 9:02 PM
That was Rolf Hochhuth and his play “The Deputy”. Curiously enough, he was a Protestant whose father had been a Nazi. Curious as well is the fact that the Nazis were overwhelmingly Protestant (especially Lutheran); something that some of the rather overeager stone-throwers among this blog should contemplate.
The play was nothing more than a cowardly attempt to expiate the “collective guilt” that the Nazis and their descendants felt for what they had done. The Catholic Church did not gas anyone with zyklon b, the National Socialists did.
The body of the Catholic Church may not have done as much as they could have (Eugenio Pacelli deserves to be recognized as a Righteous Gentile) but that only highlights the fact that nobody did enough.
Still the main source of evidence that the critics of Pius XII use is a fictional play written by a Nazi sympathizer. Funny how fiction passes as facts for the anti-Catholic lurkers around here.
darclon on January 8, 2009 at 9:12 PM
Do you not realize how difficult it is to target all the hospitals, all the schools, and all the mosques when they are all full of the innocent palestinian Christians and muslims and innocent children? Please give the IDF some credit. Specifically targeting and intentionally killing all these innocents is a technical feat not easy to accomplish. And yet, the Israelis have accomplished it. They ought to bottle such efficiency. Those Jews are something. They could teach the Germans a thing or two about how to exterminate a people.
At this rate, it won’t be many more days before the jews kill all the Palestinians, and this whole problem is resolved. Then they can start coming after Christians in other lands. Think of all the matzoh they’ll be able to bake this Passover. Wow!
JiangxiDad on January 8, 2009 at 9:20 PM
Sorry but you have no idea what is actually happening over there nor the long,bloody history of geopolitical israels persecution of palestinian Christians.
Yes they outlawed Christians proselytizing jews and in fact they burn the New Testament openly in the streets and they stone and spit on Christians who dare to preach the Gospel in their judaist theocracy.
I’m talking about the Hebrews here…not the muslims.
Is anyone here aware of this?
They are no friends of Christianity. Christianity is their enemy.
The only group we should help and support are the palestinian Christians.
SaintOlaf on January 8, 2009 at 9:50 PM
Well, look. I’m a Catholic Boy, but I feel that it’s within my spiritual purview to say, “Screw that,” to the Bishop of Rome and the Holy See and cetera, after having mulled the issue over, which in and of itself is a form of prayer.
So, you know, screw that.
Dan Collins on January 8, 2009 at 11:23 PM
True. The Palestinians put themselves into the concentration camp in 1948.
The Catholic Church’s official pronouncements seem to reflect the overall European attitude of “blame Israel first — and exclusively”. Craven.
ddrintn on January 8, 2009 at 11:40 PM
Cardinal Martino is not a Vatican favorite. He has been the source of much controversy for a long time.
From an old file of mine:
“Michael Novak Attacks Cardinal Martino, Defends the Iraq War
Sept 16, 2004
Martino? There he goes again! The Italian newspaper Il Foglio ran a piece Dec. 16 about the frustration at the Vatican, at the secretariat of state, with the imprudent, irascible anti-Americanism of Cardinal Martino, an unfortunate recent appointment (late last year) to the Council for Justice and Peace, who has not ceased being an embarrassment to his superiors. By Michael Novak.
(Source unknown, 17 December 2003) When I was in Rome last February, Cardinal Martino was already under heavy fire for his intemperate and irrepressible anti-Americanism. Even those who before the war leaned more to the French/German position than to the American were dismayed by his uncalled-for comments.”
Connie on January 8, 2009 at 11:42 PM
When a Cardinal speaks, please do not assume he is speaking for the Pope. You could try locating a photo of the particular Cardinal, rather than using Pope Benedict’s photo.
Connie on January 8, 2009 at 11:49 PM
BTW, AP, what is reported here matters, so please get it right:
Domain Name bezeqint.net ? (Network)
IP Address 88.152.40.# (Bezeq International-Ltd)
ISP Bezeq International-Ltd
Location
Continent : Asia
Country : Israel (Facts)
State/Region : Tel Aviv
City : Ramat Gan
Lat/Long : 32.0806, 34.8142 (Map)
Language English (U.S.)
en-us
Operating System Linux UNIX
Browser Firefox
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.17) Gecko/20080829 Firefox/2.0.0.17
Javascript version 1.5
Monitor
Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 24 bits
Time of Visit Jan 8 2009 11:58:14 pm
Last Page View Jan 8 2009 11:58:14 pm
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://hotair.com/
Visit Entry Page http://hotair.com/ar…op-vatican-official/
Visit Exit Page http://hotair.com/ar…op-vatican-official/
Out Click
Time Zone UTC+1:00
Visitor’s Time Jan 9 2009 5:58:14 am
Visit Number 194,642,798
Connie on January 9, 2009 at 12:00 AM
Of course he’s right. Gaza is a concentration camp and Hamas are the people who made it one.
All the Gazan people need to do is renounce violence against Israel and Jews in general and mean it. That means, of course, ceasing to fire any more missiles into Israel.
That will never happen. Hamas is an organization of religious warfare based on the Qur’an. As such they cannot renounce violence against Jews; and, by extension they cannot renounce violence against Israel.
But if it could happen there could be peace. The money and aid Hamas diverts to war and terror would go back into the local economy turning Gaza into a tourist trap with its beaches.
It is Hamas who make Gaza a concentration camp. That is the second part of the observation that nobody seems to make and have the MSM report on it.
{^_^}
herself on January 9, 2009 at 4:00 AM
As a Catholic I can choose to ignore the Cardinal’s remarks or give them whatever weight I deem appropriate. In this case they are weightless. He has no more credibility on international politics than any man on the street. His “concern” for humanitarian conditions in Gaza may be based on biblical principles, but his words are those of a flawed and weak human being. Never assume that, because a man wears a frock, he knows whereof he speaks. One of the great things about having a bible is knowing you can turn to it for guidance when humans talk garbage.
SKYFOX on January 9, 2009 at 5:05 AM
Pardon my French, but f*** the Catholic Church.
ProfessorMiao on January 8, 2009 at 5:32 PM
Obviously a Brain Surgeon here………
Joey1974 on January 9, 2009 at 9:51 AM
No, it’s based on Google Mapping Gaza, coupled with stories like those associated with Canada Park.
I’m not giving Hamas an inch in targeting noncombatant civilians with rockets and suicide bombers, but “what goes around comes around” is, unfortunately, a historical axiom. Google “king david hotel bombing” or read Moshe Dayan’s autobiography to put things into perspective.
Then reconsider you kneejerk response.
unclesmrgol on January 9, 2009 at 10:43 AM
I think you addressed my response in the inimitable fashion that those who “have too much work to do” do (sic).
unclesmrgol on January 9, 2009 at 12:48 PM
So loving your enemy as he/she cuts off your head is the only option?
Living in a heavily Catholic community, I guess I’m glad right now I’m not Catholic.
But if the head of my church said the same thing, I guess I’d have to go with my own prayers & conscience & fight to the bitter end.
I’m with you. Muslims like that don’t care about their own ‘people’ AKA religious zealots. They are in it for the Koran. Die die die infidels.
This infidel will not die quietly.
Badger40 on January 9, 2009 at 12:54 PM
You are good at half-truths:
Yes: Israel is less than kind to Christians who attempt to evangelize Jews in Israel. I know an Evangelical Christian (converted Israeli) woman in Israel and she has related some VERY ugly — and frightening — incidents towards other Jewish believers in the LORD Jesus at the hands of Chasidic (Ultra-Orthodox) Jews in Israel. I have no need to whitewash the truth.
However, you failed – and here you are either woefully ignorant or else you are being diabolically dishonest — to mention that Palestinian Christians Arabs (PARTICULARLY of the evangelical variety) have suffered MERCILESS persecution (to include dispossession of property and, even, at times, death) at the hands of your huggable Hamas and Fatah types. The Catholic hierarchy in Israel and the Palestinian territories does VERY little (any?) speaking out against this Muslim persecution of the Evangelical/Pentecostal Palestinian Arabs. Whereas some 50 years ago, some 30% of Palestinian Arabs were some variety of Christian, that figure is now probably below 10%. Why? They no longer feel welcome by the MUSLIMS and they emigrate. It is a calumny for you to blame the Israelis for the persecution visited upon the Evangelical/Pentecostal Palestinian Arabs by their Muslim “brethren” — as is the wont of the Orthodox and Roman hierarchies in the Palestinian territories and Israel.
Nonetheless, the Israeli Government is FAR more favorably disposed towards Christians than is Hamas or Fatah. It is a joke even to make the comparison.
Also, you fail to mention that Hamas is FAR more brutal than are the Israelis towards other MUSLIM Palestinians in Gaza with whom they disagree — killing, kneecapping, imprisoning, and beating are some of their standard prescriptions for those who dare to disagree with Hamas (and are crazy enough to show it).
As far as your assertion that the only people over there that we should support are the “Palestinian Christians,” you are showing your anti-Semitic streak. Apparently you don’t believe the Bible when it says in Genesis 12:3 that God will bless those who bless Abraham and his seed (you know, those Jewish enemies of Christians).
Finally: What — pray tell — is “geopolitical Israel?” Sounds like yet pseudo-intellectual code for “the Zionist entity.” Seems to me that that might be a sword that cuts both ways. Shall we not then also talk about “geopolitical Vatican,” replete with its own national flag and ambassadors, etc? Or, are we only talking about “religious Rome” here?
sanantonian on January 9, 2009 at 7:13 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2