Buchanan: Israel’s staging a “blitzkrieg” on its Gaza “concentration camp”
posted at 9:55 pm on January 8, 2009 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | regular view
Not the first time a Nazi analogy has tripped lightly from his lips in this area, although like Cardinal Martino, he doesn’t quite have the stones to own up to what he means. He’s not comparing Gaza to a German death camp, you see, just to your average, run-of-the-mill concentration camp. The fact that he coughed up the word “blitzkrieg” literally in the same breath is but an unhappy coincidence.
A passage from Hitchens’s review of Buchanan’s World War II revisionism is worth quoting:
As the book develops, Buchanan begins to unmask his true colors more and more. It is one thing to make the case that Germany was ill-used, and German minorities harshly maltreated, as a consequence of the 1914 war of which Germany’s grim emperor was one of the prime instigators. It’s quite another thing to say that the Nazi decision to embark on a Holocaust of European Jewry was “not a cause of the war but an awful consequence of the war.” Not only is Buchanan claiming that Hitler’s fanatical racism did not hugely increase the likelihood of war, but he is also making the insinuation that those who wanted to resist him are the ones who are equally if not indeed mainly responsible for the murder of the Jews! This absolutely will not do. He adduces several quotations from Hitler and Goebbels, starting only in 1939 and ending in 1942, screaming that any outbreak of war to counter Nazi ambitions would lead to a terrible vengeance on the Jews. He forgets—at least I hope it’s only forgetfulness—that such murderous incitement began long, long before Hitler had even been a lunatic-fringe candidate in the 1920s.
Exit question: Wasn’t Russia’s assault on Georgia this summer a “blitzkrieg” too? No, wait, I forgot — that was our fault. Click the image to watch.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4
really?? maybe you should go remind Osama bin-laden about that…remember 9/11?? and perhaps you could remind them about the treatment of our POWs..
and the US didn’t follow that strategy in WWII..remember the firebombing of tokyo, and the nuking of Hiroshima??
there are no civilians…no matter what some piece of paper says…
right4life on January 10, 2009 at 8:46 AM
I’ve read the ‘back of the book’ and I know how it plays out…and so far ‘the book’ has been pretty accurate…that whole prophecy about Israel becoming a nation again after 2,500 years…you know….
right4life on January 10, 2009 at 8:48 AM
This is not a piece of paper, it is international law. It is interesting that you seem to believe there are no civilians in war. Since 1949 at least there are. The issue I take with your point of view is the potential for abuse of non-combatants by people who believe that way.
The American military will not tolerate abuse of civilians. Even the rumor of civilian abuse is investigated by competent authority (John Murtha excepted). If unfounded as in the case of the Haditha Marines those accused wrongly will be acquited. If found true as in the case on My Lai the perpatrators are brought to justice. The actions of our own nation prove you wrong.
Just because the slimeballs of the world like Hamas don’t follow it doesn’t negate the existance of the law.. In the current conflict it is Hamas that must protect the civilians because they are in control of them. As long as Hamas keeps weapons deployed among civilians Israel has the right and obligation to take out the weapons without regard to the inhumane actions of Hamas. It is unfortunate civilians must die to protect Israeli civilians from Hamas rockets. Once Israel captures the civilians then it becomes Israels responsibilty to protect them.
kanda on January 10, 2009 at 9:26 AM
its a worthless piece of paper…mccain was TORTURED now wasn’t he??? so *we* have to follow it, but our enemies DO NOT, obviously…as in 9/11…
if you can’t enforce a law..guess what its useless as the paper its written on…
right4life on January 10, 2009 at 9:53 AM
why don’t we sign a law that everyone has to be nice and happy???
then everything will be ok!!
right4life on January 10, 2009 at 9:54 AM
i still do not get IT! is israel a nation or not? If Israel is a nation does it have the right not only right but an obligation to defend its citizens?
TomLawler on January 10, 2009 at 10:10 AM
Some may not enforce the law but we do. Thats what counts. I know that one day those who violate the law will be brought to justice. Adolph Hitler paid for his violation with the destruction of Germany and the loss of his life. Japan paid with the destruction of Japan. America helped rebuild both of them after the big one WWII. We did it because our humanity toward others. It is sad you have so little faith in us to think that American values should be based on the values displayed by others. I assume you are American but if not then I apologize. I am frustrated that the some of the rest of the world does not follow our American example. I am proud that American does not follow theirs even when my hatred for whay our our enemy does sometimes makes me wish we did.
The United States of America is unique in the world. A true beacon of hope for others to strive to emulate. Thats why I love the USA. As Reagan said. We are “A bright shining city on a hill”…. Thank God for making us stronger than our enemys am I pray his grace will allow us to continue this sole example for the other nations..
kanda on January 10, 2009 at 10:15 AM
“whay our” should be “what” in my post abouve on.
kanda on January 10, 2009 at 10:19 AM
kanda,
We have a law in my city whereby you can’t shoot a gun within a few hundred feet of a residence. If a home invader breaks into my house, I will have to break that law. Your argument that I should be noble and follow the law while the other guy doesn’t isn’t very logical.
Buddahpundit on January 10, 2009 at 10:37 AM
you’re living in a fantasy world. you think the North Koreans who tortured our soldiers in the korean war, the north vietnames who toruted our soldiers will EVER be brought to justice?? sigh…I can see why you would believe in evolution…amazing.
you think Hamas or Hizbullah or any other acts of terror by muslim radicals will ever be brought to ‘international justice’??? please…only if christians commit acts of terror would there be any outrage by the ‘international community’
first off where were those ‘values’ when we fought WWII?? was america a bunch of terrorist thugs when we bombed tokyo and hiroshima?? hell no. we fought the war to WIN..which we did not do in north vietnam, and korea…and we see those lives of our citizens were thrown away in vain…
get a clue, war is total…and without total war there is no total victory…and the conflict continues…and those lives were wasted. your ‘laws’ cost the lives of a great deal of americans for nothing…
these ‘laws’ only act to deter countries like the US from achieving victory…
right4life on January 10, 2009 at 10:40 AM
Sorry I never said there were not stupid laws. I am refering to the 4th Geneve Convention only for this thread. It is the law concerning civilians in war.
In your example if you are in the USA and your life and property is under threat and you have the means to protect yourself of course you must act. Do not lose your life over some idiotic law that is misapplied outside the original intent. It would behoove you to organize a grass roots campaign to get the law in your area changed.
kanda on January 10, 2009 at 10:45 AM
the US should do the same. ignore that idiotic law that only applies to us, and not our enemies. we have not achieved total victory, and it has cost the lives of tens of thousands of our troops…all for nothing.
right4life on January 10, 2009 at 10:58 AM
We will have to agree to disagree on this. Obviously you disrespect the law that protects civilians. As long as you feel that way there can no agreement of the truth of the matter. It is simply your opinion and you are entitled to it. I think you think America violated the law in WWII. I on the otherhand KNOW we did not. It is pointless to continue discussion as you obviously seem to disrespect the core values of the USA regarding our fellow man. As you point out our enemies think the same way you do. That does not justify us being like them. I hope America never is.
From your statement that you believe war is total I can only conclude that you would nuke the enemy as soon as you knew hostilities had begun if you were the Pressident. That would be an atrocity unless we were attacked with nukes first. My view is that nuclear weapons are not and should not be our first defense but our last. That is honorable and right.
kanda on January 10, 2009 at 10:58 AM
it does NOT protect OUR citizens.
obviously I do not…because the ‘law’ is a joke, a farce. we fought WWII to WIN…you are totally illogical…we bombed the hell out of civilians…its obvious we violated the geneva conventions (though they did not exist at that time)
but you have no problem throwing away tens of thousands of american lives to support some ‘law’ that our enemies do not respect. it impedes our ability to fight and win a war, by making targets ‘off limits’ but there are no civilians in war…as we KNEW in WWII..because the civilian society supports the troops by producing food, fuel, arms, etc for the troops to use.
oh please…so you are accusing the US of committing atrocities in WWII after YOU said we did NOT violate the ‘law’ in WWII… you need to take logic 101…
right4life on January 10, 2009 at 11:05 AM
That really hurts. How can you say our troops died for nothing.
That is truly a slur against the American military if I ever heard one. Our troops who have died defending our values have done so believing in American values and ideals. That is not “died for nothing”. Those troops died protecting our right to have values. This is unlike the animals that are our enemies. You dishonor the memory of the fighting men and women of America when you say their sacrifice in our name was all for nothing. You further want to disgrace them by having them act like the savages we fight against. I can’t believe you feel that way.
kanda on January 10, 2009 at 11:08 AM
That isn’t necessary. Most people understand that a threatened individual or nation can’t be expected to comply with the writing on some piece of paper when that person or nation’s continued existence is at stake.
Buddahpundit on January 10, 2009 at 11:10 AM
its pretty obvious in Vietnam they died for NOTHING..the south fell…and millions more died in the killing fields…we could have won that war by bombing the infrastructure and civilians of north vietnam…but we could not….it wasn’t ‘civilized’
pretty much the same for the Korean war…although we kept the south free…the north is still enslaved, and still our enemy….
you dishonor the troops by limiting their fighting, and making their sacrifice in vain…all to follow some idiotic sens of ‘morality’ that our enemies do not follow.
and YOU are the one that has accused the US of committing an ATROCITY by using nuclear weapons…you are the one who rather have had us invade the mainland of japan…and kill tens of millions…who is the barbarian????
right4life on January 10, 2009 at 11:11 AM
Thats right the US did not violate the law in WWII in dropping Nuclear bombs on Japanese cities. Only you thought is was wrong not me. WWII was as close as you can find to the total war you seem to relish in. Thats why in 1949 Civilian protection was enacted into law at the Geneva Convention. To prevent millions of civilians from being mistreated and killed. Will it work? Maybe maybe not. America will attempt to live by the law. You’re mileage may vary.
kanda on January 10, 2009 at 11:16 AM
now you’re either an idiot or a liar…you posted before…
newsflash: japan NEVER attacked us with nukes…
I’m glad we nuked them…it saved us from having to invade japan…which, given Iwo jima, would have meant the extinction of the japanese race…and tens of millions would have died…all because we wanted to be ‘civilized’.
again you accuse the US of atrocities. it obviously has NOT worked…millions have DIED and suffered because the US could not fight a war to win….
right4life on January 10, 2009 at 11:21 AM
Odly enough we agree somewhat on the Vietnam war since I was a combatant there and hated the government restrictions. During my time in I Corp I saw up close and personal my fellow Marines die in battle and swore at not being able to cross the DMZ and kill those commie bastards. On the other hand I equally hated the killing of civilians at My Lai.
Please do not paint me with the brush you paint the decisions of the US government. We lived by the rules we had in Vietnam. Thats what I mean. We are honorable even if we don’t agree with the law. We obey it. You got a beef with the government take it out on the govenrment not me. Even the protestors from the 60’s-70’s know it was a mistake to take it out on our soldiers , sailors, airmen, and Marines. John Kerry and Hanoi Jane may not know but you should. As far as how the Vietnam war turned out I’ll leave that to the historians. I’m just a Marine who did my duty to the best of my ability. My friends died there and you dishonor them.
kanda on January 10, 2009 at 11:25 AM
thank you for your service..but it was in vain…and no I don’t dishonor them…their own country dishonored their sacrifice by making it in vain. its tragic, but they died for nothing. we lost…not because of the individual troop’s efforts, but because we could not fight a total war…like we did in WWII…because of the geneva convention…which we followed, but the NV did not. so we lost the war, and ended up with the boat people, the killing fields…all because we could not fight to win.
war is total..unless we fight total wars, we have no total victory…we do not have to worry about nazi germany or imperial japan…total war transformed those societies…
we *won* in iraq, but that victory is fleeting…there is no transformation of that society….
right4life on January 10, 2009 at 11:28 AM
I don’t mean to insult you but your quote of what I said was only partially highlighted
What would have been a proper quote would be:
I also notice you are resorting to name calling. I’m not an idiot and I’m not a liar. If you can’t discuss things in a civil manner then I will have to end it. If you can we can continue. Are you an honorable person or will you continue to try to intimidate me with name calling. I will not return the name calling because I see it as an immature reaction on your part. Truly unmanly or unwomanly. If you can, please try to control it as much as possible.
kanda on January 10, 2009 at 11:38 AM
That gives me the warm and fuzzys NOT! Don’t be so hollow as to attempt to disgrace my service to this great nation. You don’t have to support it but at least try to hide your contempt for the Vietnam and Korean vets who had no choice in the matter. Remember unlike you it wasn’t a choice it was only a matter of time. I did volunteer but other Marines were drafted at that time. I had some of them in my platoon who died in the war and you say “but it was in vain”. Who are you to pass judgement on me and them?
kanda on January 10, 2009 at 11:49 AM
Ha ha thats right. Common sense has to enter into it.
kanda on January 10, 2009 at 12:27 PM
yeah because YOU just accused our nation of ATROCITIES since we nuked japan. and you either lied about saying:
or you just don’t understand what you posted.
first you say we didn’t ‘violate the law’ what law? then you say any nation that uses nukes FIRST commits an atrocity…so YOU are the one who dishonors our troops by accusing them of ATROCITIES.
you ’sir’ are the one who dishonors our troops.
right4life on January 10, 2009 at 1:13 PM
you’re delusional. we clearly lost that war. I already have stated the reasons why. you have an inability to reason.
and they did die in vain. truth hurts. but its the truth. you tell me, what did 50k deaths accomplish in vietnam??? nothing, zero zip nada. if we would have fought that war like we did WWII we would have won…but that would have been an ATROCITY to people like you.
pathetic.
right4life on January 10, 2009 at 1:15 PM
Iraqis have voted, celebrated Christmas, are enjoying economic growth, and are resisting terrorists. These are the transformations I can list off the top of my head.
SheofTwoMinds on January 10, 2009 at 1:18 PM
I’m thinking you have a serious issue with comprehension. Conversly you may be intentionally misrepresenting what I wrote as you take a section out of context but continue to post my entire paragraph. To wit properly quoted :From your statement that you believe war is total I can only conclude that you would nuke the enemy as soon as you knew hostilities had begun if you were the Pressident. That would be an atrocity unless we were attacked with nukes first. My view is that nuclear weapons are not and should not be our first defense but our last. That is honorable and right.
The above was part of my reply to another of your posts. You of course try to take it out of context. I hope you know that your continued misrepresentation of what I wrote only shows your own ignorance. The facts are here in the thread for all to see and you keep repeating the same mistake. I am really concerned for your mental health in that you feel the need to commit such a shameful act as out and out lying and “bending” the facts to support your unsupportable position of disdain and hatred for the Vietnam and Korean Vets.. I hope you seek the help you need before you become completely delusional. Your behavior is completely irrational.
kanda on January 10, 2009 at 1:31 PM
Your continued statements to say the Vietnam and Korean war vets died in vain because there was no military victory is dusgusting and not going to work with me. You are simply a hater of Vietnam and Korean war vets. No more no less. They did not as you say “die in vain or died for nothing”. That is simply your opinion and I do not accept it. I also realize I can’t change your disgust for Vietnam and Korean war vets. That is how you feel. I will not try any longer to correct you as the truth eludes you because you simply choose to ignore it.
This is getting a bit too personal for me. I don’t like people who dishonor Vietnam veterans. I had enough of that when I lived through that period. I am sorry but I must end this discussion now before I say something to you I will regret. Some people are not worth compromising ones values for. In my opinion you fit that category.
kanda on January 10, 2009 at 1:44 PM
its not ‘out of context’ typical dodge. what I said is true…you wrote what you wrote…don’t blame me for your inability to articulate… and I see its OK for YOU to call ME names…
you ’sir’ are a liar. and an idiot. but since you cannot defend your position…lying is all you can do…
right4life on January 10, 2009 at 1:45 PM
Ha ha That is not calling you a name it is telling you my opinion of your mental stability.
kanda on January 10, 2009 at 1:47 PM
truth, logic, and common sense don’t work with you either, obviously.
so what did they die for??? hmm?? For korea, they kep south korea free…but NK is still our enemy…for vietnam…what?? 50k americans died, and millions more died after we left…what did we accomplish again?? nothing.
you’re a lying piece of trash.
right4life on January 10, 2009 at 1:48 PM
And your point is…..?
kanda on January 10, 2009 at 1:49 PM
Sorry left out who that was too…
And you point is….?
kanda on January 10, 2009 at 1:49 PM
Translation is incorrect, I support Isreal’s right to self defense, but I also support a Law of the Return for Palestinians.
Let’s try a simile. Mexico is having both economic and drug war problems. The United Nations votes that those persecuted by their peers (Mexican refugees) have a right to resettle in California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas — all parts of the original Spanish colony of Mexico. The Mexicans take this to heart and start flooding across the border, and they are like bandits — when they see a good piece of land (lots of water, many trees), they show up with overwhelming firepower and drive the previous owners off that land. Some owners resist and are shot dead, and their families are bundled off the land and told to skeedaddle — it isn’t your land any more — it’s ours. Other owners successfully resist by shooting back — for a while. Imagine Zimbabwe transplanted to America — the guys with the heaviest weapons get to make the laws. Fast forward 50 years — what will be the reactions of the second round of refugees and their descendents? Moshe Dayan “fast forwarded” only eight years in his address at Kibbutz Nahal Oz and he could see exactly what was happening, and exactly what needed to be done. We are 60 years on now, and things are just as bad as they were 8 years in.
Whether you think it was right or you think it was wrong, there are all those refugees (or, if you are really hard-nosed, people who pretended to be refugees) and their descendants, some with love of their old homes and hatred for those who took those homes in their hearts. I had an exchange in this post with a guy who says the Bible gave the land of Israel to the Jews. Well, that certainly is an interesting viewpoint, and it was one that drove the Balfour Declaration amongst other things, but when you turn it on its ear, and the bible is the Koran or even the New Testament, there it sits with a chasm a mile wide betwixt.
It’s easy for the international community to give away things that aren’t theirs to give away. They cannot give away the Palestinian right to what was once theirs, and they cannot give away the Israeli right to defend their unarmed citizens against terrorist attack.
I can’t argue with someone who says God gave this thing to my people, when it was really an international community giving away something original held in trust for its people. You can’t argue with the Settlers on that point, and you certainly can’t argue with Hamas either. They are two sides of the same coin.
If you think I’m funny, that’s more a reflection on you than on me.
unclesmrgol on January 10, 2009 at 3:06 PM
Pat Buchanan is a lot like Ron Paul. I agree with a lot of what they both say. Then they come out with the “blame the Jews for everything” garbage and I have to turn away from them.
angryed on January 10, 2009 at 3:21 PM
Buchanan is a moron. We have zero right telling Israel that they cannot defend themselves after the amount of military might we have poured into Iraq and Afghanistan. He should shut the heck up and take his crazy meds or something.
Kyah on January 10, 2009 at 4:07 PM
that would end Israel…do you support the ‘right of return’ for the jews who were kicked out of the Arab lands???? didn’t think so.
how about a ‘right of return’ for the christians that were driven out by the muslims??? didn’t think so
how about a ‘right of return’ for the native americans where your house is?? didn’t think so.
it was NOT the ‘palestinians’ there is no such thing…they’re a bunch arab INVADERS. they stole that land from the christians…after the Romans kicked the jews out…so who’s land is it?? the Jews.
and like I said…learn to love it, cause Israel will never go anywhere…and there is nothing your, or the arabs, or the devil himself can do about it.
right4life on January 10, 2009 at 6:21 PM
Here, you admit that there are people who are entitled to return. Thank you.
Yes, like the Jews you mention above, they have a right of return.
You use an early injustice to justify a later one, as if two totally separate wrongs make a right. Additionally, no Indians have asserted a land claim against my property. If they did, I might have to vacate (or negotiate payment) if their property rights were found to be correct. There certainly were Indians in my area, but it appears that they lived further inland and used the creek which runs near my house for access to the Ballona wetlands. The land my house sits on was once in the creek — the creek changed course frequently until it was channelled in the mid 1930’s.
Then why your first statement — that a law of return would end Israel? This statement runs completely counter to your first assertion.
Your positions are somewhat contrary. I’m not sure you are thinking things through to make a whole argument.
unclesmrgol on January 10, 2009 at 11:10 PM
in your dreams.
uh yeah I’m sure that will be happening REAL SOON now…there is such a HUGE outcry from the ‘international community’ please.
delusional. if you really were consistant, you would GIVE YOUR HOUSE AND LAND to the native americans..and since I am part cherokee…I’ll take it!
becasue that ‘right of return’ would of course include their family…their kids and their kids, and their relatives….there would be no end to it…you know it and I know it.
your positions are laughable…but typical for an anti-semite.
right4life on January 10, 2009 at 11:43 PM
well… he is right. It’s not like it’s a fair fight at all.
I say we give both of them equal armaments.. let them finish this once and for all. Enough of this lobbing crappy home made rockets that don’t even dent pavement. Let’s see some real action that will give CNN something better to show than just clouds of smoke.
popularpeoplesfront on January 11, 2009 at 1:03 AM
MSNBC thinks of Pat as a Nazi but their Nazi.
In other words, an enemy of Bush is our friend.
RobCon on January 11, 2009 at 11:22 AM
Ad hominem name calling is the last refuge of the weak debater who really has no strong points to offer. I won this debate when you argued yourself into two opposing positions in your previous post. You are now chewing on your foot.
The same argument could be made of the Law of the Return — concerning the many times removed descendants of those who held the land in Roman times. And that argument was indeed put forth by Arab inciters of violence against the Jews in the 1920s and 1930s. As I’ve pointed out, your argument is completely reflexive — usable by extremists on both ends.
However, you are also implying a superior Palestinian birthrate here, which is absolutely correct if you review my link on Israeli demographics, which you so cunningly dismissed with your “God gave it to them, so it ain’t going to happen” kind of argument. Note that birthrates inside Israel of both Jews and Christians are overwhelmed by the Muslim birthrate.
Every time you argue, you validate another of my debating points. I’m just going to leave it there for other interested readers.
unclesmrgol on January 11, 2009 at 11:28 AM
right4life…come on, why are you feeding the troll?
angryed on January 11, 2009 at 12:40 PM
I’m sorry….its one of my many failings!! ;-)
right4life on January 11, 2009 at 1:08 PM
one last time…
oh yes, you are such a legend in your own mind!! but I’ve read the ‘back of the book’ and YOU lose.
right4life on January 11, 2009 at 1:14 PM
Palestinian Christians are complaing about this in droves.
Almost every Church is decrying these actions by the israeli government.
Why is this so hard for you to believe?
Have you ever fathomed the possibility that you could be wrong about your assumptions?
Have you ever considered looking at both sides of the story before jumping to conclusions?
So what is the answer? other than the one you and Pat espouse which is to kill every Jew in that place. … then move on to the rest of the world. Nazi’s tried it once. .I see no reason they won’t again.
Noelie on January 11, 2009 at 3:32 PM
“by (Abraham’s) descendants all the nations of the earth shall be blessed” (Gen 26:4)
I hope you understand that Scripture is referring to Jesus Christ.
So.. you are saying God didn’t understand plural when he said this? Seems to me he meant many different answers to this statement.
Noelie on January 11, 2009 at 3:34 PM
Therefore, if you’re Norweigan, then I can call you a lutefisk eating little p*ssy and you’d be okay with that? Excellent
You do of course understand that Norwegians are just Swedes with their brains knocked out? j/k :)
Noelie on January 11, 2009 at 3:37 PM
Another is, like the penultimate Ward Churchill (aka I’m-an-Indian-too) imitator, you are failing to consider all facts. The only difference is which side of the meter the needle is on in both of your cases.
If you were a real Cherokee, you’d know the history of your own tribe, and perhaps from that understand somewhat the feel of Palestinian moccasins as they walk their own Trail of Tears.
unclesmrgol on January 11, 2009 at 7:30 PM
why don’t you go F yourself you anti-semitic racist piece of trash?
right4life on January 11, 2009 at 8:37 PM
OOOH. That last comment of mine must have really hurt. I did make a point associated with the topic under discussion, however — something totally lacking from your latest comment.
unclesmrgol on January 11, 2009 at 8:58 PM
you just proved what you are…trash. it looks like my comment was spot on!
right4life on January 11, 2009 at 9:27 PM
Lesseee, you have me as anti-Semitic racist autoerogenous trash. You forgot commie homophobic sexist papist. You’re slipping, Ward.
In any case, we both know to which place this conversation has descended, so you are welcome to have at it. I’ll just comment from up here on top of this pile of trash on how well you are doing down there at the bottom of the scummy pond.
unclesmrgol on January 11, 2009 at 9:34 PM
oh yeah I checked your web site…too funny!!! no comments, and no one posting except you…how does it feel to be such a failure at that??
and its easy to see why!!
right4life on January 11, 2009 at 9:37 PM
oh yeah don’t you get tired of bending over to mecca five times a day?? do you have trouble sitting down??
right4life on January 11, 2009 at 9:38 PM
I see you have found the weakest link for right4life. The truth sends right4life into an ignorant banter that only the truly uneducated can appreciate. I love the tag Ward Churchill too. It is so appropriate. My kudos to you!!
Sorry right4life. Your true colors are showing for all the world to see.
kanda on January 11, 2009 at 9:56 PM
oh so you’re an anti-semite too!!
why am I not surprised!!
right4life on January 11, 2009 at 10:12 PM
Ha ha How are things down in the sewer? From up here looking down at you it looks pretty dismal. Sorry you can’t think up a better come back than that. Give it some time, I’m sure you will if someone helps you. Maybe in an hour or two or certainly by the weekend.
Meanwhile your continued support of Buchanan is a wonder to behold.
kanda on January 11, 2009 at 10:21 PM
looks like my ‘comeback’ was spot on.
thanks for the laughs, your stupidity is good for something!
right4life on January 11, 2009 at 10:58 PM
At least I have a blog (btw, where’s yours?), and I’m running my own software on my own personal linux box in my living room, and I’ve been doing so for over 5 years. I’m not particularly caring that I’m not noticed — I’m not using wordpress or blogger and I have no rss feed, all of which are essential today to be noticed. But being noticed is not why I blog, otherwise I would have given it up four years ago or so.
By the way, did you use the search engine on the front page and type in “Israel” before you tarred me with the “anti-Semite” comment? I didn’t think so. I thought I’d mention it, just in case you wanted to learn something.
I notice that your method of debating others is to call them names or use the big F. That sort of stuff might work out on the playground, but it doesn’t work here. The facts are what work here — they make friends and influence enemies (well, some enemies, at least).
unclesmrgol on January 12, 2009 at 12:24 AM
Noelie, you might want to fix your profile — the blog your name references (http://nefrytatanen.blogspot.com/) doesn’t seem to exist.
unclesmrgol on January 12, 2009 at 12:27 AM
The man is more than delusional. He has a strange and obsessive need to revision Hitler’s Germany – I would almost say Buchanan has sympathies for the late Nazi Germany. I would also say he has a bitter hate for Israel, and it would be hard not to argue that he is anti-semitical.
It is unfortunate he masquerades as a conservative, because ino way is he one. He is a protectionist and really little mmore than a populist.
More than that, it seems he can’t even find anything good to say about his own nation. The US always does wrong even when it does nothing other than showing diplomatic support for Georgia. Is there a dictator he doesn’t like?
Faramir on January 12, 2009 at 4:53 AM
Get a grip people, Geneva is a worthless piece of paper. When did Japan ever countenance Geneva? It is an agreement for gentlemen nations and gentlemen nations are very unlikely to go to war with each other. It was meant to protect our soldiers – if you really believe Al Queda, or Iran care, man are you delusional.
Faramir on January 12, 2009 at 4:55 AM
oh wow, you have LINUX BOX!!! that means you are a COMPUTE GOD!!! truly a legend in your own mind….
comparing the native americans to those murderous treacherous palestinian dogs is insulting, and shows just what kind of trash you are.
the FACTS are you are anti-semitic…your ‘right of return’ for the jews to arab lands would result in the death of millions of jews by either the government or their neighbors.
and the ‘right of return’ for the arabs to israel..when it wasn’t there land, they STOLE IT in the first place, shows you want to end the jewish state…and it would result in the deaths of millions of jews…
which is what you are all about…bet you’re wearing a starched brown-shirt, and have a picture of hitler on your wall…
right4life on January 12, 2009 at 8:47 AM
and the lesson learned was…….Ta Da!
I guess you can’t teach and old dog new tricks.
kanda on January 12, 2009 at 9:36 AM
Um, no. Today is the burgundy polo shirt. The brown herringbone isn’t until Wednesday, and I don’t starch because I always remove my laundry promptly from the dryer.
I do not have a picture of hitler on my wall. His picture is, howerver, in a book (”Inside the Third Reich” by Albert Speer) in my library. Right now, he is conversing (via Mr. Speer) with Ulysses S. Grant and Moshe Dayan on the second shelf — I assume about armaments or total war or somesuch.
You forgot the swastika. I do have one, because one of my uncles liberated it from an SS guy while fighting his way through Italy. It is never displayed, but kept in a closet with the Japanese map my Dad got in the Pacific, under a 48-star US flag folded into a triangle which another uncle got at Iwo Jima, and on top of all is my small contribution — a Hungarian border officer’s hat and an accompanying MUC.
At one point in our history, “The only good Indian is a dead Indian” was quite in vogue. We’ve grown up a bit since then as a nation, haven’t we? Or, rather, some of us have.
Finally, lot of people run Linux, including Ed, one of our hosts. You don’t need to be (or have) a COMPUTE GOD to do it. Or, rather, we don’t — I don’t know about YOU.
unclesmrgol on January 12, 2009 at 10:27 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4