Video: I’m not closing the door on 2012, says Palin
posted at 8:51 pm on January 6, 2009 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | regular view
Ten minutes with the Canadian answer to Carson Daly for your edification on a slow news night. Nothing too provocative, although there’s an enjoyably tense moment around 10:30 when she’s asked if she ever thought her critics were right about her being unqualified.
In any case, I need an excuse to update the poll post from this morning and this’ll do. An eagle-eyed reader checked Newsmeat, which I should have done, and found out that the polling firm involved has a history of donating to — ta da — Frank and Lisa Murkowski. So if you’re wondering how reliable the data is, weigh that accordingly.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 Next »
What are smoking?
Being a Mayor and a Gav isn’t part of a resume? You are actually dumber then i thought.
Move on troll!
upinak on January 7, 2009 at 1:53 AM
BTW, does the fact that I am actually Jewish add to you silly attempt to pigeonhole me?
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 1:54 AM
It’s late, and I’ve answered your stupid f***ing points, as have others here. In fact, it’s hard to even know what your point is.
Now I’m just enjoying a good laugh. If you had half a sense of humor you would have listened to the Jerky Boys clip I linked to and laughed with me about it. But you’re looking more and more like a humorless tight a$$. Relax. Have a little fun. I never trust anyone who can’t laugh a little.
ramrocks on January 7, 2009 at 1:55 AM
Since you have missed my point by a mile and I do have work tomorrow, I am going to hang it up for the night.
I guess, I will need to bone up on my Jerky Boys, I stopped listening to them when I was 15.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 1:56 AM
ROTFLMAO!
I had no idea what your ethnic background was, but now I’m crying laughing because it’s increasingly clear that you are that character from the Jerky Boys!
Lest you cry racism, let me add that I’m Semitic myself.
ramrocks on January 7, 2009 at 1:59 AM
So I am supposed to laugh at being called a “sissy”? I am supposed to think that is just great?
I have a pretty good sense of Humor, I also think Alaskans are bats**t crazy for the most part. Therefore I dont think your argument was valid that just because some popular alaskan guv was supported by the AIP, it somehow made legitimizing their party with a message from the sitting governor something that was acceptable. I dont know why you think that everyone should just accept that here in the lower 48.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 2:00 AM
Being a Mayor and a Gav isn’t part of a resume? You are actually dumber then i thought.
Move on troll!
upinak on January 7, 2009 at 1:53 AM
Really I didn’t include these on her Resume? Go look before you embarrass yourself further. Oh and please stop trying to bully anyone who does not support your messiah by labeling them a troll. It doesn’t work with me.
Poptech on January 7, 2009 at 2:01 AM
good night ramrocks, perhaps I will find your posts funnier in the morning.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 2:01 AM
G’night, Squid Dude! You ain’t no sissy. I kinda like you now.
Peace!
ramrocks on January 7, 2009 at 2:05 AM
Pop are you lying when you siad this wasn’t here Resume?
I think you are lying.. so let me post it one last time.
You have joined the Top of the List concerning Trolls. Enjoy the Top… as you have join and lost your freaking mind.
upinak on January 7, 2009 at 2:06 AM
Hey listen, seriously go back and read the WHOLE thread before you embarrass yourself any further.
Keep up the personal attacks for making assumptions without reading the whole thread, it only makes you look ignorant.
Poptech on January 7, 2009 at 2:10 AM
I know Poptart’s latest attack on the Gov’s fiscal conservative creds was utter bs, but I don’t have the energy right now to counter it. I’ll let Joey do it in the morning. I think he’s deflated those talking points in the past.
ramrocks on January 7, 2009 at 2:10 AM
LMAO! They are not talking points, they are facts linked directly to the sources. Do better research next time. This is getting embarrassing for you guys.
Poptech on January 7, 2009 at 2:12 AM
Yeah.. I am tired and I have to go to work tomorrow, workout and go target practice.
Pop thinks I am taking pot shots and personal problems with him. I would like to know what I said .. since I don’t even remember saying anything.. even an idiot.
To tired to care.
upinak on January 7, 2009 at 2:13 AM
You’ve attacked this woman from the moment she was named to the ticket. I read the thread that day in August. I know.
What is your problem? Were you crushed that your pet candidate wasn’t chosen for vp instead?
It never mattered what Palin did or said, and it doesn’t matter what arguments we marshall to counter your accusations. You will hate her no matter what.
I find that sad.
ramrocks on January 7, 2009 at 2:14 AM
Annoy him, and ignore him.
upinak on January 7, 2009 at 2:16 AM
I researched her and found out she was unqualified and McCain only picked her because she was a woman. I don’t hate her but think she is unqualified, inexperienced and wrong on important issues.
Calling me a troll and insane doesn’t counter anything. You guys don’t have any arguments, just insults and bully tactics. Yes I do find that sad.
And guess what I was right, Obama won.
Poptech on January 7, 2009 at 2:17 AM
G’night, fruit cake. Good work. I’ll most likely kill your arguments in the morning.*
*Princess Bride allusion
ramrocks on January 7, 2009 at 2:18 AM
Much better than admitting you can’t read the whole thread and made ignorant assumptions.
Poptech on January 7, 2009 at 2:18 AM
May the dog with 1000 fleas sleep with you and make you squirm endlessly in your sleep.
Get a clue.. MSM BS you are posting is just that…. BS.
You dang liberal.
upinak on January 7, 2009 at 2:28 AM
I have only posted facts you don’t want anyone to know about. Too funny calling me a liberal – try libertarian.
Poptech on January 7, 2009 at 2:37 AM
I remember when you linked to the debunked USA Today article about how Palin raised spending 27%, and the polls you list in your laundry list of Spam have no dates.
chunderroad on January 7, 2009 at 2:44 AM
You’re a librarian?
ramrocks on January 7, 2009 at 2:44 AM
How about deranged Paul-tard?
chunderroad on January 7, 2009 at 2:45 AM
He’s still listing that USA Today story.
ramrocks on January 7, 2009 at 2:45 AM
Bwahahaha! Poptech’s an idiot. “My dad said he switched his vote because of Palin.” Then he whines that no one can refute the facts he “links.”
chunderroad on January 7, 2009 at 2:56 AM
He’s brilliant. He can post polls over and over again on multiple topics.
V15J on January 7, 2009 at 3:07 AM
The funny thing is, you keep posting her resume as if it’s some sort of negative, when it actually matches up fine with McCain’s, Obama’s, and Biden’s. What I’m trying to figure out is why a sweet resume filled with experience and advanced degrees is only necessary if you’re Sarah Palin….if you’re not….eh, it’s just not that big a deal?
Frankly, I hope we come up with a better candidate in 2012, because Sarah’s damaged now, like it or not, but I’ll never understand the level of PDS exhibited by some.
xblade on January 7, 2009 at 3:07 AM
If we continue to allow the left to destroy our talented candidates, then we’ll be stuck with loser legacy candidates like the Bush family. We could have had George Allen for a candidate this year. But he was destroyed by a stupid monkey joke.
And now you want us to abandon Palin because of Tina Fey. I say, “BULLSH*T!”
ramrocks on January 7, 2009 at 3:13 AM
Your an idiot because I did not make that statement.
Poptech on January 7, 2009 at 3:35 AM
Yes, you did.
Poptech on January 6, 2009 at 11:38 PM
chunderroad on January 7, 2009 at 4:32 AM
This is why Sarah Palin will be around for a long time!!!
What a great interview.
davo on January 7, 2009 at 4:55 AM
Watching the manic trolls attacking her still, they’re afraid of a recall vote for the lightworker any day.
the_nile on January 7, 2009 at 5:38 AM
Sarah is so damaged that she invokes another 500 comment thread. Please get real. Sarah is the real deal. She maintains and retains her popularity. Nothing short of death or a major scandal will cause her supporters to leave her. Sarah is a ‘keeper’. Superstars rarely come along. The people that support Sarah know it and are not about to throw this opportunity away.
technopeasant on January 7, 2009 at 5:39 AM
technopeasant
Amen, brother…er, sister, whatever. I’m firmly convinced that the hatred for Governor Palin is the product of fear. Isn’t it delicious?
SKYFOX on January 7, 2009 at 6:09 AM
Really? Quote the post date and time. This is so sad. If you guys cannot even follow a simple conversation no wonder you cannot research candidates.
Poptech on January 7, 2009 at 6:32 AM
He noted it but you ignored so let me show you what you posted.
Cindy Munford on January 7, 2009 at 6:40 AM
Actually he posted something previously posted by squid shark saying his life long Rep. father couldn’t vote for McCain because of Gov. Palin. Get this, because of Bristol’s pregnancy. At the risk of hurting squid shark’s feelings I think it is far to say that his father’s beliefs don’t reflect the majority of folks in the country today. Most of us don’t condemn a person by the mistakes made by their offspring. There are people who didn’t vote for her because of her accent. And guess what, there are folks who didn’t vote for Mr. Obama because of his skin color. There are people we shouldn’t emulate.
Cindy Munford on January 7, 2009 at 6:52 AM
These are the days when Palin supporters looks suspiciously like Obamaniacs. Any criticism of the One must be trolls and maniacs.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 6:54 AM
Reading is fundamental, Cindy, I never said any such thing. My father is a good and smart man and would never not vote for someone over something as stupid as her daughter being pregnant. He disliked Palin for the same reasons I do.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 6:56 AM
It’s not criticism you come up with, and you know it.
the_nile on January 7, 2009 at 6:57 AM
You are absolutely confused. Squid said that about his father, NOT me.
This is sad, you even quote my post and it has nothing to do with what Squid said, LMAO!
This is really getting embarrassing you people cannot even keep the conversation straight.
Poptech on January 7, 2009 at 6:57 AM
And furthermore, Cindy, there are alot of people who dislike her politically for a variety of reasons, It does not take away from her personal appeal. I respect her for her keeeping Trig, I respect her hard working life, I respect her sons service. That in no way means I would vote for her for president.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 6:58 AM
Well , she wasn’t running for president Obama was, and you voted left of left , that’s a fake.
the_nile on January 7, 2009 at 6:58 AM
Once again,
I
VOTED
MCCAIN
But in my case I had to hold my nose because of Palin.
As for my father, that is his business.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 7:00 AM
So far (not just here) I am now a Liberal, Democrat, Obama Supporter, Troll, Insane, Maniac, Crazy, Left-Wing Nut, ect… Too funny.
Before Palin came on the scene there was somewhat of a debate now it is down to bully tactics in support of the right-wing messiah.
Poptech on January 7, 2009 at 7:01 AM
Ummmm OK….???????/
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 7:01 AM
So if 2012 it’s either Obama or Palin , you vote Obama or not at all?
the_nile on January 7, 2009 at 7:02 AM
LMAO! (spits drink on keyboard)
Poptech on January 7, 2009 at 7:03 AM
Um… other parties exist. You can vote Libertarian or the Constitution party. I will vote Libertarian if those are my choices. I think people are confused that their are more than two choices.
Poptech on January 7, 2009 at 7:05 AM
Good that you can admit it.
the_nile on January 7, 2009 at 7:06 AM
In 2012 we will see, I will check out her platform etc.
We will also see how Obama governs, I doubt he can do enough to get my vote, but we have no clue what kind of president he will be.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 7:06 AM
That wasn’t the question.
the_nile on January 7, 2009 at 7:08 AM
Your “question” was flawed by trying to pretend there are only 3 choices.
Poptech on January 7, 2009 at 7:11 AM
No , in reality there only been 3 choices in presidential elections.
the_nile on January 7, 2009 at 7:23 AM
Poptech,
Neal Boortz is a BETTER LIBERTARIAN THAN YOU, YA LEFTIST RON PAUL SUPPORTER!
Now go please kindly suck the **** of Obama–YA OBOT!
BobAnthony on January 7, 2009 at 7:51 AM
Ken Blackwell for RNC Head with Palin for President & Jindal Vice President in 2012. America faces DESTRUCTION at the hands of the MARXIST 3 stooges, Obama, Reid & Pelosi with the time left to save it limited to 2010 MidTerms followed by the 2012 General. 8 years of the 3 Stooges & a Soviet Amerika will be a reality shortly followed by an Islamic Republic America.
Max47 on January 7, 2009 at 7:55 AM
Whether or not she would prefer it, I don’t see that Palin would insist on heading the POTUS ticket 2012, though by then she’d be better skilled and armed to counter neo-liberal critics and daunting enemies alike.
Noting the disappointing “experienced” McCain efforts to destroy American conservatism, to argue against Palin is to further the McCain plague. Johnny lacks loyalty. Get past him. To her credit, Palin has. Those who continue to malign Palin are the asshats that promote disappointment for a living.
Even now, Palin and Jindal make a most intriguing team for independent conservatives to rally ’round.
maverick muse on January 7, 2009 at 8:34 AM
Here’s a good campaign slogan, my wife sent to me today.
conservnut on January 7, 2009 at 8:44 AM
You are so right, I did indeed blend you statement with Poptech’s answer. Sorry.
Cindy Munford on January 7, 2009 at 8:52 AM
She seems happy were she’s at..link. maybe she shouldn’t run.
An Era of Hate on January 7, 2009 at 8:58 AM
BTW..
Alaska.. one of the top five states with the most executive power..
Vermont.. (howard dean) is dead last..
Massachusetts is the top rated.. FWIW
DaveC on January 7, 2009 at 8:59 AM
in 4yrs, she’ll likely still be hot, 48yrs old with a 4yr old grandson. The Cougar jokes in the media will be relentless, she will still be a gravitational force of curiosity.
that said, Obama is going to screw up so bad on Foreign Policy the idea of the Republicans electing a woman with little foreign policy cred is a stretch. Somehow she has to overcome that obstacle.
jp on January 7, 2009 at 9:14 AM
Nice little “entertainment” this morning. The clash of egos, mostly of the liberal variety who can’t get it right.
Kokonut on January 7, 2009 at 9:19 AM
You know, I like Mitt Romney, he is okay. However if you cannot beat John McCain in a primary, how in the world will he be able to beat Palin?
kcarpenter on January 7, 2009 at 9:27 AM
If Sarah doesn’t run for Prez in 2012, I am personally going to haul my ass to Alaska and spank her on the steps of the Governors mansion.
LimeyGeek on January 7, 2009 at 10:18 AM
By visibly surrounding herself with brilliant people in all fields – demonstrating her executive competence.
LimeyGeek on January 7, 2009 at 10:20 AM
amen bro.
Onager on January 7, 2009 at 10:54 AM
1 word… debate
ok maybe 2 words economy
hanzblinx on January 7, 2009 at 11:21 AM
There may be a problem with the 2012 Date.
http://youhavetobethistalltogoonthisride.blogspot.com/2009/01/2012-movie-end-of-days-coming-2009.html
Dr Evil on January 7, 2009 at 11:21 AM
i voted for Mitt Romney … Romney won every single GOP debate by a landslide
he was 100% correct on economic interviews … he made everybody on the stage look like fools
he still lost
joey24007 on January 7, 2009 at 11:30 AM
And PDS still rages on.
You would think liverals would be bad. Looks like the libertarians are worse…. and Sarah has libertarian values.
I guess it sucks to be a Libertarian this day and age.
upinak on January 7, 2009 at 11:34 AM
LOL… too funny. BTW it was -30 at my house this morning.
But if you come up.. bring your rifle. She may wanna go moose hunting!
upinak on January 7, 2009 at 11:36 AM
its +43 here in NJ … and I am freezing
joey24007 on January 7, 2009 at 11:42 AM
Yes. I think that you are a Axelrod troll because you keep bringing up the same ridiculous claims.. the pregnant daughter, the church thing, the beauty paegent, the five colleges as well as spam posting Romney’s resume on every single Palin thread. I’m surprised you haven’t posted about the book banning and rape kits yet. If you come up with anything original, by all means please post it.
Frankly, your comments really distract from an adult discussion of the 2012 elections and any valid criticisms of Palin. I think that Palin was probably wrong to accept McCain’s offer as VP, think that unless Obama manages to sink the economy that she should wait until 2016 to run, and do think that she needs to brush up on foreign policy and come up with a valid pro-family agenda concerning education, health care, taxes, the economy, etc. However, I also admire Sarah immensely as a women and appreciate her mad skillz as a politician. I think that her ability to rise from humble blue collar beginnings and become a governor and major player in U.S. politics is something that could only happen in America and is why I love the U.S. I’d much prefer a 100 SPs to a EU aristocracy made up of Mittens and Kennedys.
Illinidiva on January 7, 2009 at 11:44 AM
Suck it up buttercup!
upinak on January 7, 2009 at 11:45 AM
Let me state the obvious: Mitt is a Mormon. He may have been the brightest and best qualified of the lot, but the GOP is just not ready for a presidential candidate who is Mormon, Muslim, Jewish, atheist or gay.
factoid on January 7, 2009 at 11:45 AM
They have a crap load of wrong information on Sarah. Pop is just using the power of the internet MSM BS to prove what he thinks is valid. And won’t listen to those who actually live in Alaska and have seen what is going on.
But, don’t take my word for it. Hell someone accused me of being Sarah Palin..
/SNORT!
upinak on January 7, 2009 at 11:47 AM
Fact.. ummm isn’t that what they said about… JFK? A Catholic.
upinak on January 7, 2009 at 11:48 AM
Hey, dude, watch out with that kinky S&M talk. I was chastised here yesterday for making a racy comment about Gov. Palin. Some called me sexist and misogynist, even suggesting that I should be banned. You could end up like me if you are not careful :-)
factoid on January 7, 2009 at 11:50 AM
I don’t like Mittens because I find his personality off-putting and creepy, the same reason why I don’t like CHuckles. It has nothing to do with him being a Mormon. I think that someone like Jon Huntsman would be an interesting Pres. or VP candidate (perhaps to add some foreign policy expertise to a Jindal or Palin ticket).
Illinidiva on January 7, 2009 at 11:52 AM
Yeah, and he never got the GOP nomination. Plus they shot him.
Seriously, though. Go back to the archives from a year ago and look at all those polls. Look at all the comments saying things like “religious freedom is a fine idea, but Romney’s beliefs are so delusional that he can’t possibly be President.”
factoid on January 7, 2009 at 11:54 AM
Okay, what happened to the REAL AP?? This fake AP put up a decent photo of Gov Palin. The REAL AP only uses mud-ugly photos of the Gov to stroke his distain for her. So again, where is the real AP and who is this impostor?
(But by me, if the impostor can stick around, that’d be fine.)
Brian Paasch on January 7, 2009 at 11:55 AM
McCain the Geezer had electile dysfunction.
He got a prescription for some ViagSarah.
But America said, not now, I have a
headwallet-ache.jgapinoy on January 7, 2009 at 11:57 AM
Fact. Look, Alaska didn’t have who I wanted in my Primaries. I wanted Fred!. But they didn’t even have him on the ballot. So I CHOOSE Romney. I don’t care if he is Mormon, it is what his religon is… not my problem, or issue. He WAS the lesser of all evils. Don’t give me the “You don’t like Romney because of this” crap.
That is why it ticks me off to no end. All of these people ran for president, it split us ALL… conservative to Rhino to Libertarian.. etc. Yet.. it split us in different way since not EVERYONE was on the Ballots. Which honestly should have been illegal to begin with as it is a Federal Election… not a State.
But that IMO. I wonder what would have happened if ALL the people were on the ballots….. who would have been chosen then.
upinak on January 7, 2009 at 11:58 AM
+2000
There are valid reasons to not want Palin if you are on the right but all the crap Poptech spewed where silly nonsense.
For example he points out that she raised taxes on the oil companies so that most mean she is not libertarian. WTF???
She raised there taxes because these companies had been running in cahoots with the previous Governors to cheat the state. They were buying political favors and destroying the political process. You obviously don’t understand the dynamics between Alaska’s’ natural resources, its citizens (who actually own it which is actually different from other states) and the oil companies who have dominated the states politics for years on end before she started cleaning house.
If you don’t want Palin then fine. No problem. I admire and respect peoplee who will vote for those they thing best represent their principals. No need to denigrate her to make your self and your ego feel better.
Worse yet is to pretend to be shock that others find your behavior silly.
Look I like and admire Palin. But I got issues with Palin and think she needs to get more aggressive the issues and the things she lacks knowledge with. Do as Reagan (for example) did, and become an expert in the things people say you don’t know anything about. It’s not that hard, it’s politics.
But it is down right stupid to throw away a politician of Palin’s caliber.
Dritanian on January 7, 2009 at 12:04 PM
You mean Frank Murkowski. Who is on Exxon’s BOD. Yep… total waste of Carbon!
upinak on January 7, 2009 at 12:13 PM
Agreed. You can fix knowledge deficits. She’s a natural, charismatic speaker. We don’t have enough of those in conservative circles.
cs89 on January 7, 2009 at 12:16 PM
upinak on January 7, 2009 at 11:58 AM
Saw your note about Fred. I voted for him in the NV primary before I moved. What do you think of the “teamsarah” group? I heard Jeri T. is involved with it.
Just curious.
cs89 on January 7, 2009 at 12:17 PM
Team Sarah seems ok. I am in it but I don’t participate like those who are in it. I am in Alaska, not like I can’t get any closer to the real thing.. right?
Also, it is concerning me that people ARE making her to be like a Messiah in many aspects. I have asked for people not to do that, but I am tired of the constant snide remarks, the over looked items she has done and the BS and lies coming out. One of the reasons I don’t have a problem defending her.
She isn’t perfect. But who is?
upinak on January 7, 2009 at 12:21 PM
upinak on January 7, 2009 at 12:21 PM
Thanks. I’m sure she’ll do things I’ll wonder about over the next few years. At this point, she is the brightest star in the GOP and is taking some unfair hits.
She seems to be the real deal from down here in the lower 48. If there’s a better Conservative alternative that emerges over the next couple of years, fine. I agree with what I think you’re saying about the sniping at her that’s going on.
Let her rise or fall on her own. Don’t try to cut her off at the knees over petty junk or lies.
Anyway, stay warm!
cs89 on January 7, 2009 at 12:26 PM
Let me illustrate the strategy that MSM, the nutroots, Huffington Post and of course Obama and his merry men and women are using to destroy Sarah. It can be described with the acronym PASS:
1)PRESUMPTUOUS BEHAVIOR AND CONDUCT:
a)being disrespectful or inconsiderate in a malicious way
b)feigning excessive familiarity (pundits) or taking liberties in an arrogant or overconfident manner when NOT entitled or qualified to do so
c)ascribing to someone qualities or ideas that distort or misrepresent one’s record so as to exploit someone or take advantage of someone unscrupulously
2)ABSURDITY AND AD HOMINEM ATTACKS:
a)belief that people’s lives have no purpose of meaning
b)inviting ridicule
c)being irrational, incongruous, or irrational
3)SPECIOUS SUGGESTION AND REASONING:
a)appearing to be true or genuine but actually false
b)using pretense to make something superficially attractive or deceptively pleasing but actually of no real interest or value
4) STRAW MAN
a)presenting a misrepresentation of the opponent’s position and then refuting it, thus giving the appearance that the opponent’s actual position has been refuted
b)quoting an opponent’s words out of context-choosing quotations that are not representative of the opponent’s actual intentions
c) presenting someone who defends a position poorly as the defender and then refuting that person’s arguments, thus giving the appearance that every upholder of that position, and thus the position itself, has been defeated
d) inventing a fictitious persona with actions or beliefs that are criticized, such that the person represents a group of whom the speaker is critical
e) oversimplifying an opponent’s argument, then attacking the simplied version
Now I, as a simple peasant, know this and want to humbly inform the thousands that read this blog the this obsession to destroy Sarah is completely orchestrated by sinister forces that work on Obama’s behalf 24/7 and will continue to do so as long as Obama is President. Make no mistake-these forces will attack Sarah from all points of the compass, draw upon all the liberal elite pundits to legitimize the effort and propaganda, and staggering their attacks so they are the most effective and damaging to Sarah. And remember the best strategy is to attack at one’s most vulnerable point and that point currently is the Johnston family and Bristol. But it will not always be so. Be prepared for attacks on Sarah’s political record and performance eventually.
technopeasant on January 7, 2009 at 12:43 PM
They have been doing that for months already.
upinak on January 7, 2009 at 12:46 PM
Apparently, the latest rumor on the Weekly Standard blog is that a liberal front, somethingawful.com, was deliberately posting racist comments on the Team Sarah website in order to smear all conservatives as racists and wackjobs.
Illinidiva on January 7, 2009 at 12:48 PM
I hadn’t heard until this report that Levi Johnston had been harassed out of his job by the press. How disgusting – what a way to treat a new father.
Scumbags.
Jim62sch on January 7, 2009 at 12:54 PM
You mean this email that was sent out to all on Team Sarah?
upinak on January 7, 2009 at 12:54 PM
Yep that butthole would be Dan Fagan.
Would you all like his email addresses?
upinak on January 7, 2009 at 12:55 PM
Now that’s what I like to hear, Squid Dude. Keep an open mind. I knew underneath that humorless exterior there was a fair minded fellow. Now if we could only get you to laugh a little.
ramrocks on January 7, 2009 at 12:58 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 Next »