Video: I’m not closing the door on 2012, says Palin
posted at 8:51 pm on January 6, 2009 by Allahpundit
Ten minutes with the Canadian answer to Carson Daly for your edification on a slow news night. Nothing too provocative, although there’s an enjoyably tense moment around 10:30 when she’s asked if she ever thought her critics were right about her being unqualified.
In any case, I need an excuse to update the poll post from this morning and this’ll do. An eagle-eyed reader checked Newsmeat, which I should have done, and found out that the polling firm involved has a history of donating to — ta da — Frank and Lisa Murkowski. So if you’re wondering how reliable the data is, weigh that accordingly.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »
many of us do not support Mitt
but maybe, just maybe … if you posted his resume, we may change our minds
joey24007 on January 6, 2009 at 11:56 PM
You have no proof except you own wishful thinking.
Squid Shark on January 6, 2009 at 11:56 PM
Did you see the Howard Stern clip asking people what they thought of Obama’s running mate, Sarah Palin?
and they all said she was great..
Top of the tickets win or lose the elections.
DaveC on January 6, 2009 at 11:57 PM
so what was the problem with the greeting lmao
joey24007 on January 6, 2009 at 11:57 PM
The fact that it existed at all, for one… oh lmao
Squid Shark on January 6, 2009 at 11:59 PM
I voted for Mitt in the Primaries.. when I lived in Michigan early last year..
glad I was able to move out of there..
DaveC on January 6, 2009 at 11:59 PM
“Everything you say is boring and incomprehensible, but that alone doesn’t make it true.”
Franz Kafka
chunderroad on January 7, 2009 at 12:00 AM
so governors are not supposed to welcome conventions?
and do you know anything about the AIP?
joey24007 on January 7, 2009 at 12:01 AM
Did you know that Palin supported Pat Buchanan in 2000?
joey24007 on January 7, 2009 at 12:01 AM
Don’t you make me separate you two.. :)
DaveC on January 7, 2009 at 12:02 AM
… waiting for fogw to type ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzz again. But then his head might just pop first.
chunderroad on January 7, 2009 at 12:02 AM
It is like right wing hysteria.
Poptech on January 7, 2009 at 12:03 AM
Squid Shark
So in other words , you are telling me that Obama’s past is not relevant but his opponents are . Gee, that’s classic Chicago politics . Let me give you a hint , Obama would had had his head handed down to him in a real debate . Remember , Ryan was a successful broker who left the corporate world to become a teacher in Chicago’s inner city whereas Obama was a state senator who won by virtually having all his political opponents disqualified . Without Emil Jones , he would had been a laughing stock at Springfield . Without Axelrod and his contacts at the Chicago Tribune , he would had been the laughing stock of Illinois . Without Ayers , he would had failed at every political endeavor and without Daley , he would be nothing even though he got a Harvard education and a law degree under his belt .
DinobotPrime on January 7, 2009 at 12:05 AM
Squid,
You are judging the man by 21st century American standards. Of course he’d be Hugo Chavez of the USA if he were president today. Sorry, he wouldn’t get my vote.
Be careful using one eras values in matching up to a different time. It can work for certain things for the most part like the Constitution, which is timeless, but many other things it just all falls apart comparing apples to oranges.
Sapwolf on January 7, 2009 at 12:05 AM
That and the 10 or 12 million dollars the flowed into McCain’s coffers the few days after he announced her..
DaveC on January 7, 2009 at 12:05 AM
How’s this for proof?
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/tim_shipman/blog/2008/09/01/sarah_palin_doubles_john_mccains_fundraising
A contemporary account of the $10 million fundraising bump accompanying her selection as veep.
I think that’ll suffice to show the “send in money” part.
cs89 on January 7, 2009 at 12:05 AM
I know they are a party with secessionist leanings that wants to “repatriate” federal land (essentially giving it special status among states).
I know that if I were govenor I would not take the time too greet such a party, did she send a greeting to the Democrat convention too? I would assume if the third largest party she is not affiliated with gets a greeting, the second largest would too.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 12:06 AM
Obama went to TUCC and palled around with Ayers and Dohrn. A satellite greeting to the AIP means nothing.
chunderroad on January 7, 2009 at 12:06 AM
awesome … the only Obama has accomplished is getting his opponent’s tossed off the ballot and smearing his opponents
he is a classic example of a machine politician … we see them all of the time here in NJ
We have two dem machines … Camden and Hudson counties
joey24007 on January 7, 2009 at 12:07 AM
I will clarify, the send the money part probably was helped by her.
Obama had some pretty good months after August as well methinks.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 12:07 AM
Did I ever, at any point say Obama’s was OK to do all that?
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 12:08 AM
i don’t think you are going to have to worry about that
joey24007 on January 7, 2009 at 12:09 AM
However, yes I think that he would have beat Jack Ryan since ol’ Jack pretty much beat himself didnt he?
Squid Shark on January 6, 2009 at 11:49 PM
Those “sealed” divorce records getting into the papers was classic Obama/Chicago politics.
Granted, Ryan did give him the stick to beat him with. Still dirty to publish the divorce records over the objections of both Mr. & Mrs. Ryan.
cs89 on January 7, 2009 at 12:09 AM
From ‘Doodad Pro’ ‘John Galt’ and other fictitious names..
all documented here by Ed and AP on Hot Air if you followed along..
DaveC on January 7, 2009 at 12:09 AM
I will clarify, the send the money part probably was helped by her.
Obama had some pretty good months after August as well methinks.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 12:07 AM
(Sigh.) Do I have to look up her rally numbers vs. Biden’s for you too?
cs89 on January 7, 2009 at 12:10 AM
Squid Shark
Considering that there was no credit card check , almost everybody in the world can donate to Barack Obama , even Donald Duck .
DinobotPrime on January 7, 2009 at 12:10 AM
Sorry, that does not fly with me, plenty of people saw what was wrong with his Native American Policy at the time.
I understand different eras, but defacto eugenics is generally frowned upon universally.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 12:10 AM
Sorry, the geek in me got the better…
DaveC on January 7, 2009 at 12:11 AM
Thanks. When people argue that Sarah should not be the nominee for 2012, we get a lot of idiot troll stuff much of the time. I especially like the argument that she should hold off and go for it in 2016.
The trolls just hate her and what she stands for: Goodness over elitism.
Sapwolf on January 7, 2009 at 12:12 AM
It explains your boyish Palin obsession.
Poptech on January 7, 2009 at 12:12 AM
Yes, but it was not as frowned upon then as it would be now. Jackson hated indians except dead ones.
Sapwolf on January 7, 2009 at 12:13 AM
I love how Palin has become the only person you can support and by not supporting her you are no longer a Fiscal Conservative or a Libertarian but a Troll. This is sad.
Poptech on January 7, 2009 at 12:14 AM
No, I saw her speak at The Villages in C FL.
I also saw her speak here in Jacksonville as well. More people came to see Obama, and this is the Conservative epicenter for the state.
Biden is boring (except when he says something stupid) so is McCain, Palin and Obama were interesting to listen too. Thus more people came to see them.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 12:14 AM
Just for kicks, does anybody have the numbers for the rallies with John McCain alone, John McCain & Sarah Palin together, and Sarah Palin alone?
If my hunch is right, those should make Squid’s head explode.
cs89 on January 7, 2009 at 12:14 AM
You are absolutely right. However that is why it is up to her NOT to run. It is a judgment call that she has to make. It is my hope for the reasons I mentioned that she not run until 2016. At the moment she is damaged goods with the people who decide elections–the independents. Recognizing that a lot can happen in four years, at this point in time she would lose.
patrick neid on January 7, 2009 at 12:15 AM
So basically your arguments against her are what exactly? That she did a standard satellite video greeting for the Alaska Independence Party (she does tons of those for all sorts of parties and conventions) or that you father wouldn’t vote for her?
ramrocks on January 7, 2009 at 12:15 AM
that explains you being gay.. and not the good kind either..
NTTIAWWT
DaveC on January 7, 2009 at 12:16 AM
I think that that is a simple argument. I think that people like to use that as a crutch to avoid a real discussion.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 12:16 AM
Guess we were posting at the same time. Interesting how you basically conceded the point that her turnout was probably higher than McCain.
Psst- that “enthusiasm gap” also affects vote turnout.
Just thought you should know.
cs89 on January 7, 2009 at 12:17 AM
Neither, both elements of a completely different discussion, try to keep up.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 12:17 AM
Snark aside, the “enthusiasm gap” does not always translate into votes.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 12:18 AM
So Squid Shark , who do you think that McCain should had chose as his VP and would had given him the presidency ??
DinobotPrime on January 7, 2009 at 12:20 AM
I dont think independents nationwide were ever really that jazzed up about her after the first week. I dont know if they ever will be, whether that is due to the hit job by the media or her own personality will likely be borne out in time.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 12:20 AM
BTW, Squiddy..
need to fix the link in your name.. or start your blog again..
DaveC on January 7, 2009 at 12:20 AM
that one made me laugh.. :)
DaveC on January 7, 2009 at 12:21 AM
I dont know if anyone would have helped him given the rise of the economy as the chief concern. I dont think any other republican would have done better either.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 12:21 AM
Im working on it.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 12:22 AM
Good Can Do attitude there..
what America was built on..
DaveC on January 7, 2009 at 12:23 AM
Bullshit, I worked in Florida and I was at the Palin rally in Polk City, FL. There were mainly three types of people at that rally:
1) Straight McCain voters. Not too many.
2) Palin fans who talked endlessly about how they were thinking of not voting at all and how they were so excited that McCain picked Sarah. Whole lotta these people.
3) Hillary fans or woman voters who loved Palin as a woman. More than 1) less than 2).
When working the voter precinct, the Florida voters for McCain helping out were more afraid of Obama than pro-McCain, but they loved Palin, especailly the women. But it was fear of Obama that was the only or main driving force, not so much McCain. This was different in 2000. Voters in FL narrowly voted for Bush but it was more of a vote for Bush as against Gore.
It was really exciting to get that view, although that was the view in central Florida. If you live in a blue state, there may be more pro-McCain voting as opposed to anti-Obama voting.
You cannot believe the gushing over Palin at the rally. The lady I stood next to at the Rally was a Hillary fan, who transferred loyalties to Palin and focused more on her strong feminine leadership and inspiration to women. Of course that is not as popular in blue state urban areas but it was there.
Sapwolf on January 7, 2009 at 12:23 AM
Michelle Obama trying to imitate Jackie Kennedy?
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=499287290565003897&hl=en
An Era of Hate on January 7, 2009 at 12:24 AM
I live in the largest Red City in the great State of FL.
btw, FL is Blue now.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 12:25 AM
I went with my guy, at the time I didnt know that the massive crash that was waiting at the finish line, neither did you.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 12:26 AM
I agree with you here. For a Republican to win this election, certain circumstances would have had to be present. It was an outright Dem year going into the election. No doubt about.
Sapwolf on January 7, 2009 at 12:26 AM
Snark aside, the “enthusiasm gap” does not always translate into votes.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 12:18 AM
A lack of enthusiasm always depresses turnout.
I agree this was a tough election for any republican to win. We apparently disagree as to whether McCain was the best we can do this time, and who would be best next time.
We need somebody to rally behind, and vote for in 2012.
I don’t want to be voting against Obama, but for my candidate this time- preferably without nose plugs.
cs89 on January 7, 2009 at 12:27 AM
I meant in general. Everything else even, it is actually a Red state still. It just went blue due to the economy and the delays in getting out of Iraq primarily. Same with North Carolina.
Sapwolf on January 7, 2009 at 12:28 AM
Obama outspent McCain something like 6 – 1..
had the MSM eating out of Obama’s hand..
The media onslaught on Sarah Palin.. minutes after she was announced even..
and Obama only won by 52 – 48 percentaged points.. (yeah, yeah, electoral college and all that..)
Imagine if the Republicans put up a candidate that people where excited about.. and not voting for McCain just to vote against Obama..
DaveC on January 7, 2009 at 12:32 AM
Pretty simple, really. It was Palin that galvanized the voters to McCain’s side or more accurately to Palin’s side and not really McCain per se. But the ironic thing is that Palin have more political experience than Obama and everybody was saying that she didn’t have enough experience to be veep? That made me laugh. And now we’ll have “Uh Uh” in the White House.
Kokonut on January 7, 2009 at 12:33 AM
.. and the FM/FM crisis.. bail-out.. suspending the campaign stunt..
forgot to add in that..
DaveC on January 7, 2009 at 12:33 AM
I’m hoping the same with Virginia as well..
Terry McCallif looks like he might try to run as Governor here soon.. (shudder)
DaveC on January 7, 2009 at 12:35 AM
With all due respect, that’s nonsense. I’ve noted this many times here, but I’ll note it again.
The majority of swing voters are last minute “low information” voters.
Robert Stacy McCain over at the American Spectator made a great point about these “moderate” “swing voters”:
In times of economic uncertainty “low information” swing voters (who tend to tilt more socially conservative — as was evinced by the Obama voters who supported Prop 8) will vote for Democrats because they fear that they will be the next ones out of jobs and in need of big government’s help. In times of economic prosperity, these same voters tend to vote Republican because they want to keep more of what they earn and ride the entrepreneurial wave of prosperity.
She is only “tainted” goods if she slinks away and allows the MSM to destroy her credibility. As Eleanor Roosevelt famously said, “no one can make you feel inferior without your permission.”
Look at the above interview. She sounds very well. She comes off as likable. She is likable. And she’ll be even more likable after years of recession. The one think the American public will not forgive is a bad economy. I don’t think his policies will do anything to help this economy.
ramrocks on January 7, 2009 at 12:35 AM
Simple yes, but still the crux of the argument.
Many GOP voters like to vote for someone they think is a good nice person. Sarah seems nice. Many GOP voters are sick of the pretending to be for limited goverment and then spending like crazy and getting in too deep in Iraq or pulling out of Iraq too early. Frustration is setting in. People can be afraid. Sarah makes them feel good because they believe she cares about them, and will serve them not the beltway or special interests.
She’s a sweetheart, and how can you be against an American sweetheart? She connects personally it feels to people. She has it. She struggles more than any national politician with what we struggle with. When I see her holding Trig, it reminds me of how I miss my son and the greatest day of my life when he was born and I was very supportive of my wife (and tremendously proud of her).
She’s got warm fuzzies all over the place. :)
Sapwolf on January 7, 2009 at 12:37 AM
I am not denying her personal appeal. The problem is that if I want to vote for the warm fuzzy, I would vote in American Idol.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 12:41 AM
Yep. If the economy tanks and things are worse in 2012, who here still doubts that a Palin or a Jindal can move that 48% up a little bit to 51% or 52% and win?
We are ONLY talking about a mere 4% swing in popular vote.
Think of it: McCain despite everything including the MSM protecting Obama and viciously attacking Sarah, plus the beginning of the recession and McCain ONLY lost by 4%.
I am SO optimistic that we can win back the Congress and POTUS in the coming years, but we also need to govern as moderate to conservatives with first principles and become better working in today’s media.
Things will get better.
Sapwolf on January 7, 2009 at 12:43 AM
How about this?
Sarah Palin, the Fiscal Conservative?
DaveC on January 7, 2009 at 12:45 AM
That is what gives me the warm fuzzies about Sarah..
everything else is icing on the cake..
DaveC on January 7, 2009 at 12:47 AM
Squid Shark
At last , a moment of clarity from you . The problem of the GOP stemmed from the fact that McCain was not the most popular guy among true blooded conservatives and libertarians especially among the grassroots . Heck , if the GOP had ran a closed primary , Guliani or Romney would had been the candidate and race would had been even closer .
The tanking of the US economy was the result of people voting for politicians like Franks , Rangel , Schumer , Dodd , Stevens , Murtha , Obama , Clinton , Jefferson and others in both parties that offer false promises , pork , bribes as well as issued threats in order to stay in power . The supreme irony would be this , the Democrats and the press spent the last seven years blaming Bush for the economy , now they will end up fixing the economy they had worked hard to destroy and the truth is slowly coming out of the Democrats as well as the press’ involvement in wreaking the economy .
If I’m the head of the GOP , I would start building the grass roots , my own media and my infrastructure from local alderman to Senators and Governors . As for Sarah , stay in Alaska as governor because 2012 would be fun .
DinobotPrime on January 7, 2009 at 12:48 AM
That’s well and good, Squidgy, but the reality is that ordinary Americans vote for the warm fuzzy. They just voted for a warm and fuzzy socialist who cut his teeth in the country’s most corrupt political machine.
No reason why they can’t or won’t vote for the warm fuzzy hockey mom. She’s cuter and winks and is wonderfully personable in her interactions with voters.
If you are really a conservative (and not a “Concerned Conservative” sock puppet astroturfer) than you will welcome the news that Palin is a solid fiscal conservative with social conservative principles.
Palin is the only candidate with the ability to excite the base and take us to victory.
Join the fight against the socialist corporatist state or get out of the way.
ramrocks on January 7, 2009 at 12:50 AM
I have seen Squid Shark on here long before any of the Concern Trolls popped up..
DaveC on January 7, 2009 at 12:52 AM
After this last primary and the BS I saw flying around, I am still not sure I want to be associated with “the base”.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 12:53 AM
Gracias
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 12:54 AM
Good luck, I think the N Va crowd is here to stay.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 12:55 AM
After this last primary and the BS I saw flying around, I am still not sure I want to be associated with “the base”.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 12:53 AM
Your choice, of course.
cs89 on January 7, 2009 at 12:59 AM
Trying not to think about it.. if the rally call ever heats up again for DC Statehood, then I want them to annex that part in.. :)
DaveC on January 7, 2009 at 12:59 AM
I went to the Palin rally in Carson Ca and I had never gone or wanted to go to a rally before in my life . There were so many people there for her …over 25k. The Obama camp sent and emil to rally their protestors by saying how dare she come to a black democratic city to campaign. A few hundred showed up and they were nothing but vulgar and nasty.
Palin is special anyone can see that. If she could get that many people in Los Angeles can you imagine what she could do without a lousy campaigns like McCains?
I don’t think she’ll run for President . She might say it to make Liberal heads explode but I don’t think she will… and as to experience…In picking Obama and Kennedy and Franken etc the Democrats have demolished any standard and so Palin shines even more!
CCRWM on January 7, 2009 at 1:00 AM
I saw her speak in Richmond VA.. had to move the venue to the Speedway, enough people showed up..
saw some of the Obama folks who showed up.. about a dozen or so.. definitely less than twenty..
DaveC on January 7, 2009 at 1:03 AM
Good to know, but I question the intelligence of anyone who would rant about the Alaska Independence Party. If the Libertarian Party and the Constitution Party had a love child, it would be the Alaska Independence Party. They’re harmless cranks, but they are an Alaskan tradition. One of the most beloved former governors of the state, Wally Hickel, actually was elected as the AIP candidate. He later switched to the Republican Party, but he is a libertarian-leaning Alaska-first guy at heart. It’s no surprise that Palin’s most important endorsement when she ran for governor came from Wally Hickel.
So, sorry, but Squidgy strikes me as a closet HuffPost reader. Nothing wrong with that per se. I read the HuffPost. It’s just that I read it to amuse myself. I don’t believe the nonsense written there.
ramrocks on January 7, 2009 at 1:05 AM
That BS works both ways, our vaunted local Republican party here in Jax decided to buzz the rally with an airplane.
Bad form.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 1:06 AM
Neither do I, But the same could be said about reading Limbaughs site or the Free Republic.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 1:08 AM
I would however appreciate using the simple courtesy of not using a diminutive nickname. I chose my name for very good reasons, reasons I am very proud of.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 1:10 AM
The same could be said about reading the New York Times! One must use discernment and common sense. Anyone with an internet connection has the ability to investigate the truth.
ramrocks on January 7, 2009 at 1:11 AM
Indeed, I read the AIP website, watched the videos of Palin and came to the same conclusion that I had before. Bad Idea to associate.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 1:12 AM
night..
been real, been fun..
real fun.. not so much :)
DaveC on January 7, 2009 at 1:12 AM
Don’t tell me you lost your sense of humor?
ramrocks on January 7, 2009 at 1:13 AM
Isn’t the AIP much like the Green party in Minn.? the Dlf, republican and the green.. and because of that, Pawlenty was able to become the Governor there out of a three way tie..
The AIP is close to that in Alaska.. From what I’ve seen of it.. not big enough to split a race for the governor.. yet..
DaveC on January 7, 2009 at 1:15 AM
Sarah Palin you are awesome stay in the game continue to run Alaska make a few speeches/appearances for 2012 let romney on huck run even if they win you will still be young enough for a 2020 or 2024 run!! You go girl work that career and stay in touch with Bobby Jindal!!
Kevin43 on January 7, 2009 at 1:19 AM
it’s the Democratic Farmer Labor Party.. Republican.. and Green or Independence party..
DaveC on January 7, 2009 at 1:21 AM
Um, perhaps you didn’t read my post. The most popular former governor of the state was “associated” with the AIP. Alaska has only been a state for 50 years. The AIP isn’t far fetched. They hark back to the territorial days. It’s the Last Frontier, you know.
You really need to loosen up. Pot is no longer legal in Alaska, but if it was I’d recommend an Alaskan cruise with a lot of wacky tobaccy smoking for you.
Exit question: Do you hold the fact that she associated with these people against her?
ramrocks on January 7, 2009 at 1:28 AM
I lost my sense of humor in the other thread with Pop going off the deep end.
upinak on January 7, 2009 at 1:31 AM
The Myth that Palin is a Fiscal Conservative:
Palin’s Project List Totals $453 Million (The Wall Street Journal)
Spending rose in Palin’s Alaska administrations (USA Today)
- In her two years as governor, Alaska has requested nearly $750 million in special federal spending, by far the largest per-capita request in the nation. (ADN)
- As mayor of Wasilla, Palin hired a lobbyist and traveled to Washington annually to support earmarks for the town totaling $27 million. (ADN)
- Palin, who portrays herself as a fiscal conservative, racked up nearly $20 million in long-term debt as mayor of Wasilla.
Alaska Gov. Palin signs bill to hike oil tax (Reuters, December 19, 2007)
MODERATOR: “…do you support capping carbon emissions?”
PALIN: “I do. I do.”
Nothing makes me laugh harder than the myth of her being a fiscal conservative.
Poptech on January 7, 2009 at 1:32 AM
Hey! Where have you been, oh Arctic friend?
You would have gone medieval on the guy who was blathering on about the AIP. You’d have thought the AIP was Branch Davidians. I tried to slap some sense into him.
ramrocks on January 7, 2009 at 1:34 AM
Pop you are insane. I think the almost full moon is getting to you!
From the other Post.
upinak on January 7, 2009 at 1:35 AM
AIP.. HA. A non-group.
He can think what he wants.
upinak on January 7, 2009 at 1:36 AM
No, she is silly though, but who isnt.
As for you argument about the former guv, that is fine, we have alot of people who are very popular in Miami, I dont want them to be Guv. Alaskans are strange birds, what is popular to them may not be the cup of tea for the rest of the country…
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 1:38 AM
Poptart, can you help me with my resume?
You’re really good at assembling them.
ramrocks on January 7, 2009 at 1:38 AM
The AIP was a very minor part of my argument, you decided to make it into a major one.
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 1:39 AM
Why am I off the deep end because I don’t support the right wing messiah and actually know how to research things?
Poptech on January 7, 2009 at 1:41 AM
I have NEVER said to call Sarah the messiah. Actually I have always said DO NOT put her up as one! If you don’t believe me look at other posts. Ramrock can verify with me…
Also in the other thread I have countered EVERY thing you have said. I am not sure why you are going insane.. but you are BECOMING WORSE then the MSM. Why? What is the reasoning? Obama not good enough for you?
upinak on January 7, 2009 at 1:43 AM
You have not countered a single thing I have posted. Adding talking points to the resume does not change the resume.
Poptech on January 7, 2009 at 1:45 AM
Oh God.
For someone with the word “Shark” in his screen name, do you realize how sissified you sound?
I’m trying to imagine your voice, and the only thing I can think of is the Saul Rosenberg character from the Jerky Boys.
ramrocks on January 7, 2009 at 1:49 AM
You can call me a sissy all you want, you dont know a damn thing about me.
As for that statement, you dont talk about the points, just nail me with a ad hominem attack and move on huh?
Squid Shark on January 7, 2009 at 1:51 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »