<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blagorahma: Does Judicial Watch have the goods on Obama&#8217;s denials?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/06/blagorahma-does-judicial-watch-have-the-goods-on-obamas-denials/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/06/blagorahma-does-judicial-watch-have-the-goods-on-obamas-denials/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:20:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Oh my: Blagojevich&#8217;s defense lawyers move to subpoena Obama</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/06/blagorahma-does-judicial-watch-have-the-goods-on-obamas-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-3493204</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Oh my: Blagojevich&#8217;s defense lawyers move to subpoena Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=39527#comment-3493204</guid>
		<description>[...] 1 phone call between Obama and Blago himself, I think that&#8217;s old news. Judicial Watch discovered evidence of it the following month, but both men have a legit excuse for the contact: Blagojevich was in Philly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1 phone call between Obama and Blago himself, I think that&#8217;s old news. Judicial Watch discovered evidence of it the following month, but both men have a legit excuse for the contact: Blagojevich was in Philly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catching Up: Tuesday Round Up &#171; Jane Q. Republican</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/06/blagorahma-does-judicial-watch-have-the-goods-on-obamas-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-1762943</link>
		<dc:creator>Catching Up: Tuesday Round Up &#171; Jane Q. Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=39527#comment-1762943</guid>
		<description>[...] appears President-elect BHO might have lied about his contact with Blagojevich.  Expect silence from the mainstream [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] appears President-elect BHO might have lied about his contact with Blagojevich.  Expect silence from the mainstream [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lyfsatrip</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/06/blagorahma-does-judicial-watch-have-the-goods-on-obamas-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-1762675</link>
		<dc:creator>lyfsatrip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=39527#comment-1762675</guid>
		<description>Both letters are &#039;canned&#039; that probably went out to ALL Governors.  Not that I&#039;m defending &#039;The One&#039; but what I&#039;m relatively certain of is that their admission they had &quot;no  contact&quot; was specifically in reference to the Blago dibacle.  I agree that they should have stated they sent out these 2 letters but it is far from anything damaging at this point.  I still don&#039;t believe when they say the transition team had no contact with Blago....where are all those serious gut wrenching journalist that love to get this sort of dirt?  The clock is ticking and we need the truth exposed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both letters are &#8216;canned&#8217; that probably went out to ALL Governors.  Not that I&#8217;m defending &#8216;The One&#8217; but what I&#8217;m relatively certain of is that their admission they had &#8220;no  contact&#8221; was specifically in reference to the Blago dibacle.  I agree that they should have stated they sent out these 2 letters but it is far from anything damaging at this point.  I still don&#8217;t believe when they say the transition team had no contact with Blago&#8230;.where are all those serious gut wrenching journalist that love to get this sort of dirt?  The clock is ticking and we need the truth exposed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Dog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/06/blagorahma-does-judicial-watch-have-the-goods-on-obamas-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-1761692</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=39527#comment-1761692</guid>
		<description>Obama will be the Grant of the 21st Century. He has all the earmarks.The man has not one clue of what is going on around him. His Bullshit detector is broken and that is going to comeback to bite us all....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama will be the Grant of the 21st Century. He has all the earmarks.The man has not one clue of what is going on around him. His Bullshit detector is broken and that is going to comeback to bite us all&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlagObamagate: Proof Obama lied about no Blago contact? &#124; Fire Andrea Mitchell!</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/06/blagorahma-does-judicial-watch-have-the-goods-on-obamas-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-1761557</link>
		<dc:creator>BlagObamagate: Proof Obama lied about no Blago contact? &#124; Fire Andrea Mitchell!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=39527#comment-1761557</guid>
		<description>[...] Where theres smoke theres fire. Judicial Watch claims today that they have documented proof that Barack Obama lied when he said he had no contacts with Rod Blagojevich.  The letter they gained from a Freedom of Information query certainly does show that Obama acknowledged meeting with Blagojevich, but it falls far short of indicating any sort of discussion on replacing Obama in the Senate: Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it has obtained documents from the office of Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich through the Freedom of Information Act related to Blagojevich’s contacts with President-elect Obama and his transition team. The documents include a December 3, 2008, letter from Barack Obama following his December 2, 2008, meeting with Blagojevich as well as a November 17, 2008, letter signed by Presidential Transition Team co-chairs Valerie Jarrett and John Podesta providing Blagojevich with a list of transition team contacts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Where theres smoke theres fire. Judicial Watch claims today that they have documented proof that Barack Obama lied when he said he had no contacts with Rod Blagojevich.  The letter they gained from a Freedom of Information query certainly does show that Obama acknowledged meeting with Blagojevich, but it falls far short of indicating any sort of discussion on replacing Obama in the Senate: Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it has obtained documents from the office of Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich through the Freedom of Information Act related to Blagojevich’s contacts with President-elect Obama and his transition team. The documents include a December 3, 2008, letter from Barack Obama following his December 2, 2008, meeting with Blagojevich as well as a November 17, 2008, letter signed by Presidential Transition Team co-chairs Valerie Jarrett and John Podesta providing Blagojevich with a list of transition team contacts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christene</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/06/blagorahma-does-judicial-watch-have-the-goods-on-obamas-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-1761474</link>
		<dc:creator>christene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=39527#comment-1761474</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;documented proof &lt;/blockquote&gt;

So the newspaper article, Barry&#039;s own team members  not enough proof?...lol...Barry has the media shoved up his arse pretty tight!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>documented proof </p></blockquote>
<p>So the newspaper article, Barry&#8217;s own team members  not enough proof?&#8230;lol&#8230;Barry has the media shoved up his arse pretty tight!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: volsense</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/06/blagorahma-does-judicial-watch-have-the-goods-on-obamas-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-1760915</link>
		<dc:creator>volsense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=39527#comment-1760915</guid>
		<description>Obama lied.  Name a politician that doesn&#039;t.  Case closed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama lied.  Name a politician that doesn&#8217;t.  Case closed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hillbillyjim</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/06/blagorahma-does-judicial-watch-have-the-goods-on-obamas-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-1760902</link>
		<dc:creator>hillbillyjim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=39527#comment-1760902</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t matter. There&#039;s no shortage of room under &quot;the bus&quot; for any number of folks who will fall on their sword for the &lt;strike&gt;Messiah&lt;/strike&gt; Mistake. Or have their sword meet them halfway, with help from Above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter. There&#8217;s no shortage of room under &#8220;the bus&#8221; for any number of folks who will fall on their sword for the <strike>Messiah</strike> Mistake. Or have their sword meet them halfway, with help from Above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SKYFOX</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/06/blagorahma-does-judicial-watch-have-the-goods-on-obamas-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-1760731</link>
		<dc:creator>SKYFOX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=39527#comment-1760731</guid>
		<description>Has he trotted out the &quot;no controlling legal authority&quot; line yet or are they saving that for a stickier wicket?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has he trotted out the &#8220;no controlling legal authority&#8221; line yet or are they saving that for a stickier wicket?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaddyJ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/06/blagorahma-does-judicial-watch-have-the-goods-on-obamas-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-1760721</link>
		<dc:creator>PaddyJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=39527#comment-1760721</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;He who controls the past, controls the future&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Slogan of the Party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;He who controls the past, controls the future&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Slogan of the Party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rovin</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/06/blagorahma-does-judicial-watch-have-the-goods-on-obamas-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-1760703</link>
		<dc:creator>Rovin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=39527#comment-1760703</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;They’re either acting like they have something to hide, or &lt;strong&gt;demonstrating a large degree of incompetence at handling crises&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

These poor democrats can&#039;t even get the doors open to a new congress without stumbling.  Panneta gets the nod for CIA director and no one bothers to inform the head of the Senate Intell committee, (Feinstein).  Harry Reid can&#039;t get his trycicle pedals in reverse fast enough to end the unseated Illinois Senator fiasco.  In one week the Senate Majority leader has gone from &quot;we will not accept any appointee from Blagojevich&quot; to &quot;as long as his paperwork is complete, we can work something out&quot;.  Round two of an economic stimulas package proposed by the Dems has inflated from 700 billion to upwards of 1.2 trillion.  Throw in an out-of-work crude comedian into the upper chamber, and a few more Clinton and Carter relics into the mix, Allah and Ed will have plenty of COMPETENCE storys to write about for months to come.  Special thanks must go out to the folks in Illinois that have provided us with so much Chicago-style &quot;hope and change&quot;, and our adoring media that was complicit in the delivery.  Pass the popcorn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>They’re either acting like they have something to hide, or <strong>demonstrating a large degree of incompetence at handling crises</strong>.</p></blockquote>
<p>These poor democrats can&#8217;t even get the doors open to a new congress without stumbling.  Panneta gets the nod for CIA director and no one bothers to inform the head of the Senate Intell committee, (Feinstein).  Harry Reid can&#8217;t get his trycicle pedals in reverse fast enough to end the unseated Illinois Senator fiasco.  In one week the Senate Majority leader has gone from &#8220;we will not accept any appointee from Blagojevich&#8221; to &#8220;as long as his paperwork is complete, we can work something out&#8221;.  Round two of an economic stimulas package proposed by the Dems has inflated from 700 billion to upwards of 1.2 trillion.  Throw in an out-of-work crude comedian into the upper chamber, and a few more Clinton and Carter relics into the mix, Allah and Ed will have plenty of COMPETENCE storys to write about for months to come.  Special thanks must go out to the folks in Illinois that have provided us with so much Chicago-style &#8220;hope and change&#8221;, and our adoring media that was complicit in the delivery.  Pass the popcorn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beagle</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/06/blagorahma-does-judicial-watch-have-the-goods-on-obamas-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-1760676</link>
		<dc:creator>Beagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=39527#comment-1760676</guid>
		<description>Blagojevich’s taint

Dude...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blagojevich’s taint</p>
<p>Dude&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canditaylor68</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/06/blagorahma-does-judicial-watch-have-the-goods-on-obamas-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-1760569</link>
		<dc:creator>canditaylor68</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=39527#comment-1760569</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;They’re either acting like they have something to hide, or demonstrating a large degree of incompetence at handling crises.&lt;/blockquote&gt;


&lt;strong&gt;BINGO!&lt;/strong&gt; I would say this is pretty much the Obama administration&#039;s M.O.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>They’re either acting like they have something to hide, or demonstrating a large degree of incompetence at handling crises.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>BINGO!</strong> I would say this is pretty much the Obama administration&#8217;s M.O.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IlikedAUH2O</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/06/blagorahma-does-judicial-watch-have-the-goods-on-obamas-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-1760547</link>
		<dc:creator>IlikedAUH2O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=39527#comment-1760547</guid>
		<description>Somebody, a conservative site has a Palin calendar on sale.
Is HE the initials?
 
Aaa,,,,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somebody, a conservative site has a Palin calendar on sale.<br />
Is HE the initials?</p>
<p>Aaa,,,,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anniekc</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/06/blagorahma-does-judicial-watch-have-the-goods-on-obamas-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-1760485</link>
		<dc:creator>anniekc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=39527#comment-1760485</guid>
		<description>The country is NOT INTERESTED in anything NEGATIVE about Barack Obama at this time.”



Have you tried to get in an Obama supporter&#039;s face and ask them what they think of THE ONE now?? They refuse to ackowledge anything even remotely unusual about him!! The Kool-Aid lives on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The country is NOT INTERESTED in anything NEGATIVE about Barack Obama at this time.”</p>
<p>Have you tried to get in an Obama supporter&#8217;s face and ask them what they think of THE ONE now?? They refuse to ackowledge anything even remotely unusual about him!! The Kool-Aid lives on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: INC</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/06/blagorahma-does-judicial-watch-have-the-goods-on-obamas-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-1760466</link>
		<dc:creator>INC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=39527#comment-1760466</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;BobMbx on January 6, 2009 at 1:25 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

More of that phony Office of the President-Elect stuff along with the seal.

Clinton and Obama seem to have run for office as a way of handling their personal journey for validation and acceptance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>BobMbx on January 6, 2009 at 1:25 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>More of that phony Office of the President-Elect stuff along with the seal.</p>
<p>Clinton and Obama seem to have run for office as a way of handling their personal journey for validation and acceptance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: singlemalt_18</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/06/blagorahma-does-judicial-watch-have-the-goods-on-obamas-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-1760464</link>
		<dc:creator>singlemalt_18</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=39527#comment-1760464</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Fixed it for you!

grapeknutz on January 6, 2009 at 1:23 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thanks!  What was I thinking!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Fixed it for you!</p>
<p>grapeknutz on January 6, 2009 at 1:23 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Thanks!  What was I thinking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buy Danish</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/06/blagorahma-does-judicial-watch-have-the-goods-on-obamas-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-1760459</link>
		<dc:creator>Buy Danish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=39527#comment-1760459</guid>
		<description>What I find more interesting is the lawyerly stall from Blago&#039;s office when they say that they have &quot;no independent knowledge of &lt;strong&gt;all&lt;/strong&gt; individuals who are representatives&quot; in the office of president-elect, Transition Project, or SEIU, and are thus unresponsive to the request (barring a second round where specific names are provided).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I find more interesting is the lawyerly stall from Blago&#8217;s office when they say that they have &#8220;no independent knowledge of <strong>all</strong> individuals who are representatives&#8221; in the office of president-elect, Transition Project, or SEIU, and are thus unresponsive to the request (barring a second round where specific names are provided).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: INC</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/06/blagorahma-does-judicial-watch-have-the-goods-on-obamas-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-1760444</link>
		<dc:creator>INC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=39527#comment-1760444</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;They’re either acting like they have something to hide, or demonstrating a large degree of incompetence at handling crises.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree with Buckaroo on January 6, 2009 at 12:58 PM.

&lt;blockquote&gt;They’re &lt;strike&gt;either&lt;/strike&gt; acting like they have something to hide, &lt;strike&gt;or&lt;/strike&gt; &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; demonstrating a large degree of incompetence at handling crises.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>They’re either acting like they have something to hide, or demonstrating a large degree of incompetence at handling crises.</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree with Buckaroo on January 6, 2009 at 12:58 PM.</p>
<blockquote><p>They’re <strike>either</strike> acting like they have something to hide, <strike>or</strike> <em>and</em> demonstrating a large degree of incompetence at handling crises.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vashta.Nerada</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/06/blagorahma-does-judicial-watch-have-the-goods-on-obamas-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-1760395</link>
		<dc:creator>Vashta.Nerada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=39527#comment-1760395</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Wouldn’t a discussion of the senate seat be economic policy? I mean, you have to determine an asking price, discuss what the market will bear, and so forth.

Nugai on January 6, 2009 at 1:01 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
And, don&#039;t forget the discussion of how much is Barry&#039;s cut...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Wouldn’t a discussion of the senate seat be economic policy? I mean, you have to determine an asking price, discuss what the market will bear, and so forth.</p>
<p>Nugai on January 6, 2009 at 1:01 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>And, don&#8217;t forget the discussion of how much is Barry&#8217;s cut&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/06/blagorahma-does-judicial-watch-have-the-goods-on-obamas-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-1760394</link>
		<dc:creator>acat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=39527#comment-1760394</guid>
		<description>The country is NOT INTERESTED in anything NEGATIVE about Barack Obama at this time.”

    singlemalt_18 on January 6, 2009 at 1:10 PM

Hysterical!

sherry on January 6, 2009 at 1:14 PM

-------

What scares me, sherry and singlemalt, is what happens when America is forced to confront the fact that Obama is, at the core, a politician.

That has the potential to turn very very ugly....

Mew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The country is NOT INTERESTED in anything NEGATIVE about Barack Obama at this time.”</p>
<p>    singlemalt_18 on January 6, 2009 at 1:10 PM</p>
<p>Hysterical!</p>
<p>sherry on January 6, 2009 at 1:14 PM</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>What scares me, sherry and singlemalt, is what happens when America is forced to confront the fact that Obama is, at the core, a politician.</p>
<p>That has the potential to turn very very ugly&#8230;.</p>
<p>Mew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buddahpundit</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/06/blagorahma-does-judicial-watch-have-the-goods-on-obamas-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-1760380</link>
		<dc:creator>Buddahpundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=39527#comment-1760380</guid>
		<description>It looks like a form letter to me except for the &quot;Dear Rod&quot;. Are we certain that Blago is the only gov who received it?

Couldn&#039;t &quot;open discussion&quot; mean a discussion between Obama, Biden and several ( or all ) of the governors at this governor&#039;s meeting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like a form letter to me except for the &#8220;Dear Rod&#8221;. Are we certain that Blago is the only gov who received it?</p>
<p>Couldn&#8217;t &#8220;open discussion&#8221; mean a discussion between Obama, Biden and several ( or all ) of the governors at this governor&#8217;s meeting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marine_Bio</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/06/blagorahma-does-judicial-watch-have-the-goods-on-obamas-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-1760375</link>
		<dc:creator>Marine_Bio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=39527#comment-1760375</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I became an American for the sole purpose of reintroducing the word ;)

LimeyGeek on January 6, 2009 at 1:20 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And here I was foolishly thinking it was for the purpose of spreading glazed donut humor. 

;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I became an American for the sole purpose of reintroducing the word ;)</p>
<p>LimeyGeek on January 6, 2009 at 1:20 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>And here I was foolishly thinking it was for the purpose of spreading glazed donut humor. </p>
<p>;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobMbx</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/06/blagorahma-does-judicial-watch-have-the-goods-on-obamas-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-1760350</link>
		<dc:creator>BobMbx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=39527#comment-1760350</guid>
		<description>Upon further review, did anyone notice the use of the Presidential seal on the letters to the Governors linked in the post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upon further review, did anyone notice the use of the Presidential seal on the letters to the Governors linked in the post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grapeknutz</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/06/blagorahma-does-judicial-watch-have-the-goods-on-obamas-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-1760342</link>
		<dc:creator>grapeknutz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=39527#comment-1760342</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;

Just breaking on NBC…

“The &lt;strike&gt;country&lt;/strike&gt; Press is NOT INTERESTED in anything NEGATIVE about Barack Obama at this time.”

singlemalt_18 on January 6, 2009 at 1:10 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Fixed it for you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>Just breaking on NBC…</p>
<p>“The <strike>country</strike> Press is NOT INTERESTED in anything NEGATIVE about Barack Obama at this time.”</p>
<p>singlemalt_18 on January 6, 2009 at 1:10 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Fixed it for you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
