Alaska Senate poll: Murkowski 57, Palin 33
posted at 1:15 pm on January 6, 2009 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Almost a mirror image of the dKos poll last month. Is the bloom off the rose?
Pollster Dave Dittman just finished a statewide survey on a possible Palin-versus-Murkowski matchup – and Murkowski beats Palin, at least in this poll, hands down…
“And I think there would be a feeling, too, of overreaching — going too far, too aggressive, too much too soon — if Sarah decided to run for Senate,” Dittman said. “When you’ve already got someone there with seniority, who most people think is doing a good job, I think it would be a huge mistake.”…
A poll commissioned last month by the Web site dailykos.com showed Palin beating Murkowski 55 to 31 percent, although local pollster Dittman says he has concerns about the methods used to arrive at those numbers.
One or the other poll’s dramatically skewed, as nothing’s happened in the last three weeks to warrant a 25-point swing. Except, er, the allegations — since rescinded — that Alaska cops suspended their drug investigation into Levi Johnston’s mother until after the election. Or the new questions over how Johnston landed a job for which he might be ineligible under federal law. Or Bristol Palin giving birth, prompting another round of wrangling between the ‘Cuda and the media. I think that covers everything.
Exit question: If she doesn’t challenge Murkowski in 2010 or The One in 2012, how’s she going to stay on the national media’s radar until 2016? Fox News will have to set aside a special weekly kaffeeklatsch segment for her or something. Don’t let us down, Greta!
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Please, continue this line of argumentation. It informs others of what you’re willing to do for cheap political points.
TheUnrepentantGeek on January 6, 2009 at 5:54 PM
Benny… please tell us about Obama’s achievements in school
joey24007 on January 6, 2009 at 5:55 PM
So let me get this straight … Palin is no threat to the Obama drones … yet they arrive her in flocks in order to bash her
strange behavior from Axelrod’s minions
joey24007 on January 6, 2009 at 5:56 PM
Old names coming back, names I have never seen before. All for Gov. Palin, who is not running for anything but doing her job. Do you hope to change anyone’s mind? I can’t even imagine who will be running in 2012 and just hoping to be pleasantly surprised in the upcoming administration, why the hate and the insults?
Cindy Munford on January 6, 2009 at 5:57 PM
upinak on January 6, 2009 at 5:53 PM
I’m not sure why you’re having such trouble understanding that:
1) the ASRC electrical apprenticeship program requires a high school diploma
2)bristol palin’s babydaddy does not have a high school diploma
3)therefore he was not qualified for the job
Are you using a poorly-ventilated space heater by any chance?
benny shakar on January 6, 2009 at 5:57 PM
Eh. It’s a hit and run troll.
Esthier on January 6, 2009 at 5:57 PM
I think Palin is gritty, clever and resourceful. All good things. But, in my humble opinion, we should require more from candidates. From what I’ve seen, read and heard from her over the past several months, there’s something lacking.
johnnynucleo on January 6, 2009 at 5:58 PM
I’m not sure why you can’t tell us about Obama’s achievements in school …
joey24007 on January 6, 2009 at 5:58 PM
well there is your problem
joey24007 on January 6, 2009 at 5:59 PM
Hmmm… I am not the one who is giving a Boy crap for a job he got without finishing his education.
Maybe we should tell those who served in WWII that they don’t qualify because most of them did not graduate either.
Thanks for playing Race. Get you head out of your elite butt will ya!
upinak on January 6, 2009 at 6:00 PM
joey obama setup the card tables in the church basement and passed out leaflets on the southside as a community organizer LOL. In school I dunno what does one do in an Indonesian school oh yeah study the Quran oops
Kevin43 on January 6, 2009 at 6:01 PM
Benny.. eat moose nuggets a choke. You even put down the WHOLE QUOTE.. Fedeal regulations do not hinder someone from not getting a job. Idiot.. look at what you posted!
upinak on January 6, 2009 at 6:02 PM
If you really believe she is “gritty, clever and resourceful” then you’d also believe she can get that certain something she’s currently missing.
You can teach the rest. You can’t teach what she already has.
This is why I’m hoping she doesn’t run in 2012, but it’s illogical to write her off, especially when you consider the impact she had this election.
Esthier on January 6, 2009 at 6:02 PM
I am with you on waiting to see what Gov Palin has to offer later and that now that she has an idea what is waiting for her I expect her to be much better prepared. That said, what is with these people? I find myself going into Mom-mode.
Cindy Munford on January 6, 2009 at 6:02 PM
benny.. oh yeah, what do you do for work.. for a second time?
upinak on January 6, 2009 at 6:03 PM
Sen Feinstein is saying Paneta isnt qualified to be CIA director he has more qualifications for this job then the President-elect has for his!!
Kevin43 on January 6, 2009 at 6:04 PM
Almost a full moon comes to mind.
upinak on January 6, 2009 at 6:04 PM
Good Lord the Trolls are out today! Is the Obamaphoria wearing off and the need for snarky banter needed to make the typical Obamaphile feel better about themselves?
Troll logic: “Obama won!, it wasn’t as much fun as we thought. Lets go beat on the Palin Pinata some more!”
portlandon on January 6, 2009 at 6:06 PM
It is the beat up on the Palin’s, daughters, son’s, Father mode.
upinak on January 6, 2009 at 6:07 PM
upinak on January 6, 2009 at 6:02 PM
Federal regulations have nothing to do with it — the diploma requirement is ASRC’s own requirement!
Sweetheart, I think you need some fresh air.
benny shakar on January 6, 2009 at 6:07 PM
Cindy Munford on January 6, 2009 at 6:02 PM
Bless your heart. I could tell. It is okay. Those of us that see Sarah’s potential get protective when condescending and uninformed things are said about her. It will be interesting to see how she develops.
kingsjester on January 6, 2009 at 6:07 PM
Aww. I feel similar. I don’t get all the attacks of her here by those who claim they want what’s best for the party.
I get the thinking she needs some time. I mean cramming is alright (though not ideal) if you’re the VP, but when she runs for president she needs to be at the top of her game.
But to completely dismiss her? That just proves that the media was very successful this election. Had they given Obama the Palin treatment, I’m sure opinions would be reversed. It isn’t as though they didn’t have plenty of material to work with.
Esthier on January 6, 2009 at 6:07 PM
You can pick on the Palin/Johnson familys all you want.However we had Jimmah the c’s brother taking a leak on the tarmac at BNA.There is of course the famous swimmer in the Senate,hopefully he will start giving rides at night to family members.Then we have Chelsey with a big bucks job doin’ sumpthin’ as payback to Slick and the witch.You wanna talk bout screwed up families at least be bi partisan bout it.
How bout we ask he Isralies to just open the gate to Gasa and tell every body to hit the road to Syria,Lebanon or Egypt.
That might be more of a news story.
Col.John Wm. Reed on January 6, 2009 at 6:08 PM
ASRC obviously didn’t go by the “rules” and still don’t since half of their labor force… does not have a G.E.D. or a Diploma. Get a grip little man.
Benny Third and LAST TIME… What is it YOU do for a JOB?
Are you that Lawyer that is Stalking Palin????? I am going to assume you are.
upinak on January 6, 2009 at 6:09 PM
….and we should care about polls that are nearly 2-years removed from an election (any election) because why?
Harpazo on January 6, 2009 at 6:09 PM
Not beating up Pinata(though I not a fan) just saying Sen Feinstein is a biased idiot.
Kevin43 on January 6, 2009 at 6:10 PM
All you need to know is that he feeds off your trough.
Entelechy on January 6, 2009 at 6:13 PM
Setting forth an opinion that Palin isn’t the best candidate available seems to constitute trolling to many of you. I’ll continue trying to find at least one blog that doesn’t devolve into an ideological (left or right) circle j*rk. Pardon my French.
johnnynucleo on January 6, 2009 at 6:13 PM
Esthier on January 6, 2009 at 6:07 PM
kingsjester on January 6, 2009 at 6:07 PM
upinak on January 6, 2009 at 6:04 PM
Thanks for understanding. I still don’t understand the nastiness of the remarks. The crude and the sly insults are the traits of bullies.
upinak, I think RaceCard means well, he wants the best for the kids and a little time spent will get Levi there. Like I mentioned this set back just means bigger and better things coming for those kids. Talk to y’all later, going out to dinner.
Cindy Munford on January 6, 2009 at 6:15 PM
I would like to stuff a couple moose nugget down his gullet.
upinak on January 6, 2009 at 6:15 PM
You’ve said far more than that. For one, who is the best person? For another, you name unexplained reasons and unease. And another, you seem to think that’s all she’ll ever be.
That doesn’t make you a troll, but it does raise questions. I don’t see that any of the questions have been unfair.
Esthier on January 6, 2009 at 6:16 PM
Race forgets… not everyone can do what they want.. even if it is to get a diploma or take care of a family. He is trying at least, unlike others.
upinak on January 6, 2009 at 6:16 PM
Bunny Shaker is an FDA test subject for Lead & Mercury poisoning…..thus the Paranoia & constant drooling.
I think banishment by ignoring Benny is best. From now on when I see his name on the end of a post all I will see is:
WHAA WHAA WHAA WHAA WHAA WHAA WHAA WHAA WHAA WHAA WHAA WHAA WHAA WHAA WHAA WHAA WHAA WHAA WHAA WHAA WHAA WHAA WHAA WHAA WHAA WHAAWHAA WHAA WHAA WHAA WHAA WHAA WHAA WHAA WHAA WHAA
portlandon on January 6, 2009 at 6:17 PM
Benny the Clown Strikes Again!
An Era of Hate on January 6, 2009 at 6:19 PM
I love how everyone is a “troll” if you don’t believe Palin is the second coming. Sorry, I thought conservatives were serious people, thinkers, well informed on policy.
Quit comparing Palin to Reagan. It’s borderline sacreligious. :-)
therightwinger on January 6, 2009 at 6:21 PM
I love how all the “true Republicans/conservatives” all know that Palin’s really just a bimbo.
I thought as you did, that conservatives were serious people who actually took the time to examine an issue or person before blindly accepting what the MSM has to say, but I’m frequently wrong on that one.
Esthier on January 6, 2009 at 6:25 PM
Actually if you look back, most of us “Palinites” haven’t. Reagan was his own man… and rightly so.
Have a great day.
upinak on January 6, 2009 at 6:26 PM
Upinak – keep up the good fight. Nolus illigitimus carborundum. I respect you and your judgement of Alaskan sources. And anyone who gets a rebuff from AP can’t be all bad.
I have never seen such patronization of a poster outside of COS. The backhanded compliments before the patronizing knife. I can hardly believe these self-identified conservatives hate Palin so much. Maybe someone can suggest to me the source of such unthinking hatres.
Old Country Boy on January 6, 2009 at 6:27 PM
Come on. Take off the blinders. She’s a nice lady. But you’re telling me she’s the best we can do? Her whole campaign deal was repeating buzz words, not actual discussion of policy.
Ronald Reagan was well versed on policy. He knew the issues. George H.W. Bush is a very smart man, who was an expert on foreign affairs. Even George W. Bush was a lot more informed than Palin.
She’s just not meant for the big leagues. Being nice and being able to give a speech are not qualifications for tackling the serious issues that one faces when being president.
therightwinger on January 6, 2009 at 6:27 PM
Probably. I’ve also been seeing some names I don’t remember at all along with some of the usual suspects.
Yep.
INC on January 6, 2009 at 6:29 PM
Can you please tell all of us, when Palin was allowed to speak freely?
upinak on January 6, 2009 at 6:29 PM
therightwinger, The Governor didn’t prepare for the presidency… Just keep that in mind.
An Era of Hate on January 6, 2009 at 6:29 PM
When did I get a rebuff?
upinak on January 6, 2009 at 6:30 PM
The key phrase is “self-identified”.
INC on January 6, 2009 at 6:30 PM
Not everyone who doesn’t think Palin is the “second coming” is a troll. Constructive criticism is healthy. Putting so much faith in a person is ridiculous and should be left to the Obamaphiles who worship idols & hypocrites.
However, attacking Sarah Palin SO viciously along with her family,friends, and possibly pets is a certain sign of mental illness…which leads me to believe they are a Liberal Troll.
portlandon on January 6, 2009 at 6:31 PM
she’s just not ready for the city council
she’s just not ready for being mayor
she’s just not ready to be governor
blah blah blah
joey24007 on January 6, 2009 at 6:31 PM
Just to clarify, I liked Palin more than McCain. He’s a total fraud who was willing to say anything to get elected. That said, we can do a lot better than those two..IMO.
Just saying how I feel. I’m not very impressed with her.
therightwinger on January 6, 2009 at 6:33 PM
OK. That’s your impression. It’s not exactly science.
Esthier on January 6, 2009 at 6:35 PM
LONG LIVE PALIN. THE ONLY HOPE FOR FREEDOM LEFT IN THIS MAD WORLD.
unseen on January 6, 2009 at 6:35 PM
Please, who is better?
Esthier on January 6, 2009 at 6:36 PM
Silly upinak, by your logic bristol’s babydaddy is qualified to teach graduate physics classes at UAA — because “federal regulations” don’t require a high school diploma!
Tell the truth… you ARE sarah palin, aren’t you?! :o)
benny shakar on January 6, 2009 at 6:38 PM
Mark Sanford, Mitt Romney, and especially Bobby Jindal. You know, well educated people who actually know what they’re talking about.
therightwinger on January 6, 2009 at 6:40 PM
Benny… why don’t you ask those who have spoken to me or email me and ask them if I am Sarah palin or not. Ed Morrisey can help you in that instance as well.
;-) back at you … creep.
upinak on January 6, 2009 at 6:40 PM
I can respect that. You have stated it. That is what primarys are for, and the republican party will come together and select their nominee. As a CONSERVATIVE I think Palin destroys most of the competition. As a Republican…she’s above average.
Nobody can compare to Reagan. I am also tired of people comparing ANYONE to Reagan. However I do give some credence to Ronald Reagan’s Son Michael, who wrote this piece about Palin:
http://townhall.com/Common/PrintPage.aspx?g=8f5d7cd2-0eb6-427e-b835-405387775c5f&t=c
portlandon on January 6, 2009 at 6:41 PM
this is for the dude who doesn’t like to compare Palin to Reagan … The dude is such and expert on both, considering that he stated that no president in the last 30 years has written their own speeches, that he only knows of Palin because of what he has seen and heard “in the last 3 months”
and even to those who have said that Palin is not “up to speed” on foreign policy.
Now … we are either 4 or 8 or 12 years away from a potential Palin run …
Here is what William F. Buckley had to say to Ronald Reagan in letter from between 72-76, which is 4 years before his first run at the presidency:
joey24007 on January 6, 2009 at 6:42 PM
We aren’t going to go to the “Because they went to a Ivy League College” BS again.. are we?
What about working, and going to college at the same time? How about doing it on your own instead of it being handed to you?
Jesus H. Christ…. when will you get your head out of Obama’s Elite Butt and stop sniffing the methane!
upinak on January 6, 2009 at 6:42 PM
Mitt Romney … the guy who introduced government mandated health care?
I didn’t know that was a conservative principle
and how can someone be negative on Gov. Palin and in the next statement push Gov. Jindal?
joey24007 on January 6, 2009 at 6:43 PM
Being elite is not a bad thing.
Being elite does not mean you cannot govern with common sense.
therightwinger on January 6, 2009 at 6:44 PM
I certainly didn’t mean that he can’t go get a GED. Seems like a good idea to me. When I said it seemed to already be over I meant the political aspect of it. He’s already quit and seems to have decided to continue his work to get a regular high school diploma. Maybe he’ll change his mind later and go for the GED. I think, as I said in an earlier post, that rules absolutely should be followed in hiring practices. It seems like in this case that his dad was trying to help him, and they didn’t dot all the i’s and cross all the t’s like they should have. Families try to help each other all the time. In this case it became an issue because a man who hates Palin decided to make one of it in order to attack her. I think it’s a shame that he’s had to leave this job, and I would feel that way about any young man trying to provide for his family. But I think that leaving it was the right thing to do, and that he should get his degree and go back to work. And make sure that next time he goes by the book.
As an aside: Boy, do the ‘Cuda threads get heated or what?
meltenn on January 6, 2009 at 6:45 PM
Yeah, the Mormon people won’t vote for?
Esthier on January 6, 2009 at 6:45 PM
Sure, but it doesn’t automatically mean you have common sense either. Most examples would seem to prove the opposite.
Esthier on January 6, 2009 at 6:46 PM
There is also a segment of the people here who have used the art of reinventing history to serve their purposes … they look at Reagan as the person who BECAME president … which is not the comparison I am making … I am comparing Reagan the CANDIDATE to Palin the CANDIDATE
both are considered to appeal only to the “right wing” of the party
both are considered to be novices on foreign policy
both are considered not to be “intellectuals” … Reagan was a C student at a small college
both are considered to “only give a good speech”
joey24007 on January 6, 2009 at 6:46 PM
So you believe being a Elitist is a great thing?
LOL.. WOW! Hey guys we have a TRUE Elitist in our Conservative mists.
So right.. are you down with the Jones’s or up with the Rockafeller’s? I wanna know where you stand concerning anything since it is now proven that you are not conservative. Get a clue.. not everyone has a silver farking spoon in their mouth.
upinak on January 6, 2009 at 6:47 PM
I don’t really understand your intention here but I will say that I voted for Mitt in the primaries, donated to his campaign and was angry as all hell when Huckster Doofus kneecapped him
And I currently follow the career of Jon Huntsman Jr. in Utah
joey24007 on January 6, 2009 at 6:48 PM
Yep they do. But in the real world.. we can just ignore them and walk away unharmed as they look the fool. Don’t you agree?
upinak on January 6, 2009 at 6:48 PM
Oh please, Romney was governor of Massachusetts. The most liberal state in the country. His health care plan has beeen twisted, just like most of his time in office by liberal legislators..It happens.
Please, Palin is not in Jindals league….He’s already served for President Bush. He’s an Rhodes Scholar.
therightwinger on January 6, 2009 at 6:51 PM
All good men. All smart. Would make great VP running mates. Not one of them personable. Not winnable.
portlandon on January 6, 2009 at 6:53 PM
Yeah, a bunch of evangelical bigots kept us from having a decent nominee by voting for Huckabigot.
therightwinger on January 6, 2009 at 6:54 PM
So Romney is the governor of the most liberal state in the union, with a democrat legislature and he doesn’t “have the common sense” to realize that his plan would be “twisted?” … wow, how would he handle Pelosi?
Bill Clinton was a Rhode’s scholar … he didn’t have the “common sense” to capture Osama Bin Laden and largely ignored terrorism for 8 years
Go figure
joey24007 on January 6, 2009 at 6:54 PM
I like Jindal too. But saying this put’s him with the same league as CLINTON! LMFAO!!!
upinak on January 6, 2009 at 6:55 PM
therightwinger, bennyshaker, et.al.
Maybe you can educate us all from which university Geroge Washington, Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, or Harry Truman graduated. I think we went through this with Supreme Court Justices. Only those from Harvard or Yale count. The rest of you uneducated slobs don’t count.
Elite is often referred to as the cream (or creme to the educated snobs). As any agricultural engineer of dirt farmer can tell you (and probably Mrs. Palin, too), cream floats to the top along with the hair, dead flies and shit. It floats to the top because it is lighter (less substance) that I’m sure upinak can tell you. That is what we need is the lightweight hair, dead flies and shit floating to the top to run this country. Based upon the preamble to The Constitution, the best educated person to become POYUS would be a West Point Graduate.
Old Country Boy on January 6, 2009 at 6:55 PM
Reagan was a C student at Eureka college and was dissed because he could not compare to the “intellectual” Jimmy Carter
go figure
joey24007 on January 6, 2009 at 6:56 PM
POTUS not POYUS
Old Country Boy on January 6, 2009 at 6:56 PM
You Betcha
portlandon on January 6, 2009 at 6:56 PM
Instead of having elections our government should automatically put the top of the class of Harvard and Yale in position of power. That’s the ticket! Even though most of the people who go to the schools are there because they are rich and not because smarter than everybody else.
terryannonline on January 6, 2009 at 6:58 PM
Has anybody read “the reagan i knew” by William F Buckley? … It is hard not to notice the similarities between Reagan THE CANDIDATE and Palin THE CANDIDATE:
As I am reading, I am noting important passages:
http://www.conservatives4palin.com/2009/01/recommended-reading-reagan-i-knew.html
http://www.conservatives4palin.com/2009/01/recommended-reading-reagan-i-knew_03.html
joey24007 on January 6, 2009 at 6:58 PM
Richard Nixon wasn’t exactly personable and he did pretty well for himself (electorally). If you’re well informed and have the ability to lead, you can get elected in this country. Especially considering the shinnagans that are sure to go do with the incompetent loons we’ve got running the place now.
therightwinger on January 6, 2009 at 6:58 PM
http://www.conservatives4palin.com/2009/01/recommended-reading-reagan-i-knew_03.html
joey24007 on January 6, 2009 at 6:59 PM
Ronald Reagan was a two term governor of the largest state in the country. He was a dovoted, true believing conservative who’s rise was slow and steady. He had time to build his resume, and was clearly aware of the damage big government liberalism has, and could do to our country.
Once again, let’s stop comparing people to Reagan. There will never be another Ronald Reagan. Ever.
therightwinger on January 6, 2009 at 7:01 PM
First, I think the majority of American voters just proved you dead wrong on that one.
Second, let’s just calm down about how Gov. Palin was not prepared to President in 2008, (an office she was not seeking).
I think she did just fine on her maiden voyage, and better than 95% of politicians in her position would have done considering the abject abuse she and her family endured.
It’s going to be a long hard road to 2012 let alone 2016,
why don’t we just sit back and see what happens. Our time would be much better spent on local elections and 2010 races than worrying about whether Sarah’s daughter’s boyfriend has a GED or not.
ChrisM on January 6, 2009 at 7:03 PM
Ronald Reagan, as governor of California, signed off on tax increase
Ronald Reagan was a C student in college … far from being a Bobby Jindal or Bill Clinton
Ronald Reagan was T R A S H E D by the moderate wing of the GOP
Ronald Reagan was T R A S H E D by the media/democrats for being a “intellectual midget”
Ronald Reagan was a “foreign policy novice” with “no experience” in that realm
get a clue dude
joey24007 on January 6, 2009 at 7:03 PM
all of those things would have kept you from supporting Ronald Reagan
going by the standards you have laid out in your arguments against Governor Palin
you lack the ability to look back at history and not see past the fact that Reagan became President
joey24007 on January 6, 2009 at 7:05 PM
upinak AZ is getting a new republican govenor female she looks promising so it might make 3 govenors to be proud of time will tell.
Kevin43 on January 6, 2009 at 7:09 PM
If she can start taking care of your Illegal issue. We might have a new winner for POTUS. Never know.
upinak on January 6, 2009 at 7:11 PM
Upinak – about the supposed AP rebuff – my mistake. I confused a following complimentary comment as directed at you and not AP. My misread. I guess these trifocals can be blamed. My compliment was in MY implying that anyone who could write so well as to get a rise out of AP has to be pretty good. I think you are pretty good anyway
Old Country Boy on January 6, 2009 at 7:13 PM
Jon Huntsman Jr for President someday!
but Huckster Doofus is out there just waiting to kneecap the next Mormon contender
we need to get Huckster out of the GOP picture
joey24007 on January 6, 2009 at 7:13 PM
therightwinger on January 6, 2009 at 7:15 PM
Nominate him in 2012..that should do it.
ChrisM on January 6, 2009 at 7:16 PM
Dude … dude
now you are basing your opinion of Palin as a conservative based on what she said on the campaign trail as THE VICE PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE TO SENATOR JOHN MCCAIN
its not working out for you guy
joey24007 on January 6, 2009 at 7:16 PM
I guess she should have disagreed in public when McCain suspended his campaign to go vote for that bailout? …
wow … wow
joey24007 on January 6, 2009 at 7:19 PM
Would’ve been nice.
therightwinger on January 6, 2009 at 7:20 PM
sarc:
I mean the Vice Presidential candidate is always supposed to disagree with the Presidential candidate
I remember reading how HW Bush, on the campaign trail, trashed Reagan’s economic views (which Bush disagreed with)
joey24007 on January 6, 2009 at 7:20 PM
How did she bring critism apon herself?
Having a baby who has down syndrom? Is that a problem for you?
Or having 5 children? Do you see children as a problem and not a joy?
Or how about She went to a State College and not a Ivy League one? Holy Hell… she had to PAY for her education.. what a concept in this day and age!
Will you grow up for once. Your arguements are becoming like a dog pooping in a field. Eventually it is either stepped on, picked up or turns green with age. Which one are you?
upinak on January 6, 2009 at 7:20 PM
William F. Buckley thought the war in Iraq was a mistake so does that mean you think the same???
terryannonline on January 6, 2009 at 7:21 PM
yes, because the VP candidate is supposed to publicly disagree with the presidential candidate on the issue that defines the campaign!
Have a nice day dude …
joey24007 on January 6, 2009 at 7:21 PM
the dude’s argument has come down to:
her rhetoric on the the campaign trail was not conservative …
oh geez
joey24007 on January 6, 2009 at 7:22 PM
Palin made a number of comments that were contrary to the official McCain campaign line, and each one of them made her sound like more of an idiot, not less. Sorry, she does not currently have what it takes to become President. The idea that McCain kept her from showing how awesome she is is a complete myth.
Big S on January 6, 2009 at 7:28 PM
therightwinger on January 6, 2009 at 7:29 PM
Yes. You are correct. It’s a cop out.
therightwinger on January 6, 2009 at 7:30 PM
Prove it. Show me something that says she wasn’t put aside or silenced? Other then reading the same speach over and over again in large groups.
upinak on January 6, 2009 at 7:31 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »