Homeland Security and Michael Yon: It’s On
posted at 11:15 am on January 5, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
Michael Yon has provided us a unique and desperately needed perspective in two theaters of war when the rest of the media chose to end embedding with the troops. Today, he brings us another perspective on Homeland Security. When a friend of Yon’s from Thailand attempted to enter the US, she got a rather unpleasant introduction to America — and Yon himself got caught up in the bureaucratic wrangling:
Problems began when she entered the airport in Bangkok. Aew had a one-way ticket to America, because we would travel back in the direction of the war before she would go home, but we did not know our exact itinerary, so she hadn’t bought a round-trip ticket back to Thailand. Before boarding the flight from Thailand to America, Northwest Airlines required Aew to buy a return ticket for 53,905 Thai bhat, or about $1,200 for a return ticket, else they would not let her board the flight. Aew paid by her credit card and pushed on. Understandably, it raises suspicions when a foreign national doesn’t have a round-trip ticket in an age of massive illegal immigration — even if that person is an educated professional with a home and career, and even though Aew has a ten-year visa to the United States. Nevertheless, Aew paid approximately $1,200 for the return ticket, and so now had a return ticket. …
While the U.S. Immigration officer named Knapp rifled through all her belongings, Aew sat quietly. She was afraid of this man, who eventually pushed a keyboard to Aew and coerced her into giving up the password to her e-mail address. Officer Knapp read through Aew’s e-mails that were addressed to me, and mine to her. Aew would tell me later that she sat quietly, but “Inside I was crying.” She had been so excited to finally visit America. America, the only country ever to coerce her at the border. This is against everything I know about winning and losing the subtle wars. This is against everything I love about the United States. We are not supposed to behave like this. Aew would tell me later that she thought she would be arrested if she did not give the password.
The Government of the United States was reading the private e-mails of a U.S. citizen (me). The Department of “Homeland Security” was at work, intimidating visitors with legitimate visas. They had at least 24 hours to check her out before she landed in the United States. What kind of security is this? The Department of Homeland Security was at this moment more like the Department of Intimidation.
Officer Knapp called my phone as I was driving to the Orlando airport. I was going to be there two hours early to make sure I would be on time, so that she had a warm welcome to my country. But instead, Knapp was busy detaining Aew in Minneapolis and was on my cell phone asking all types of personal questions that he had no business asking. Sensing that Aew was in trouble, I answered his questions. Mr. Knapp was a rude smart aleck. The call is likely recorded and that recording would bear out my claims. This officer of the United States government, a grown man, had coerced personal information from a Thai woman who weighs 90 pounds. I asked Aew later why she gave him the e-mail password, and she answered simply, “I was afraid,” and “I thought I would be arrested.”
What could I say to alleviate any of this? Could I say, “This is the U.S., nothing to be afraid of.”? The world already sees us as senseless bullies. Aew might have been detained indefinitely; even I was concerned that the Department of Homeland Security might detain Aew for no reason. Essentially, she had no rights. They had already coerced her e-mail password out of her head through intimidation.
I trust and respect Yon, and I’m certain that he has reported his experiences here accurately, from his perspective. Anyone who deals with law enforcement at any level occasionally runs across those who believe themselves to be the biggest fish in their little pond, and do not brook questions or criticism without a heaping dose of scorn on those whom they purportedly serve. In my previous career, I worked with law enforcement and emergency agencies all across the nation, and while most were pleasant and professional, I could have written a book about the exceptions.
However, it’s important to note that we are getting one side of this story. Homeland Security exists to check each entry into the US closely for any indication of potential threat. Ninety-pound people can be terrorists, too, and even people from friendly Thailand might have some bad intentions for entering the country. Obviously, Knapp didn’t know Aew like Michael knows her, which is part of the reason for screening on entry. I’d bet that the one-way ticket flagged her for further review in Minneapolis.
The part about the e-mail does seem quite disturbing. Unless they had some tangible reason to suspect her of illegal activities, Homeland Security doesn’t have any business demanding her password for her Internet account. Using the revamped FISA legislation, they could track her communications (even with a US citizen like Michael), but she should not have had to cough up her password to gain entry into the US. At any rate, it’s a waste of time for Homeland Security to demand it, as Aew will have almost certainly changed the password by now, and probably did so immediately after being released.
Michael is correct in stating that we should treat visitors better than how he describes Aew’s ordeal, and that there are some legitimate questions surrounding her treatment. It sounds like Aew ran into an officious, ego-tripping dink, and Lord knows we have enough of them in the government. Hopefully, Officer Knapp is a limited exception to the rule of professionalism at Homeland Security.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3
James: When you go through Minneapolis, you ARE in Somalia!
……..ask Al Franken if you don’t believe me!…
grtflmark on January 5, 2009 at 11:29 PM
Also, there was a theme earlier that Michael’s friend should not expect special treatment because we don’t get special treatment in Thailand. Bull, we do. We don’t need a visa, we can just show up. You don’t need a return ticket (or at least I’ve never been questioned about it, nor made to buy one at the airport). I’ve certainly never had my computer searched. If fact, I don’t think I’ve been searched in another country other than the US in 15 years.
And those searches were great fun. Those were for potential drugs I assume because I fit a profile. But of course, they don’t do profiles. And of course, they’ve done such a crack up job of keeping drugs out, I guess, you would have to say it was worth it.
Rahmulus on January 5, 2009 at 11:35 PM
I’ve seen repeated problems with the TSA and will not fly anywhere within a 600 mile radius – I’d much rather drive than subject myself to their screening – for some unknown reason, I’m ALWAYS selected to be the subject of the intense security checks.
I just heard a story from one of my coworkers of Mexican descent who is an American citizen where her minor daughter (also an American citizen) was harrassed by a TSA screener who asked her to lower her jeans and raise her shirt IN PUBLIC! Apparently the wand didn’t like the rivets in her jeans and the underwire in her bra.
This beligerent behavior continued until her mother stepped in and showed the agent the US passports and that she’s a minor. He finally let them on almost causing them to lose a flight.
In my opinion, she should file sexual battery charges against screener, file a complaint with the TSA and airport operations and contact her Senator and congressman.
That is totally unacceptable.
I also travel on business with my work laptop containing proprietary and corporate confidential information, including the potential of some of that data being covered by ITAR (arms and defense technology) regulations – my laptop doesn’t get turned on either.
Dr. Bob on January 6, 2009 at 12:26 AM
After 15 years of working closely with these people at MIA, I definitely concur. Only a small percentage (20%-25%)are competent and courteous. Things became worse after they all became one agency: Customs and Border Protection. Glorified rent a cops.
T.S.A. screeners are all wannabe cops that are always flashing their Homeland Security badges on the streets impersonating law enforcement officers.
gzelmiami on January 6, 2009 at 2:16 AM
Relax, it wasn’t the US Government, it an idiot that was on a power trip. Consider where all this took place. Look how long and how they counted votes up there. It must be something in the water.
mixplix on January 6, 2009 at 6:37 AM
The 911 hijackers did a lot of documented traveling
Sounds like the perfect choice for a terrorist
Do searches under ‘beheadings in Thailand’ to read about the muslim insurgency in southern Thailand. Typical article about the second beheading in a month in the IHT
You may recall missionaries beheaded by muslim insurgents and the plot to blow up airplanes that was hatched in Thailand. Jemaah Islamiyah is said to have influence in southern thailand which has been under martial law on and off for years
entagor on January 6, 2009 at 10:55 AM
I’ve had a lot of dealings with each of the following organizations over the years. There are four organizations involved:
TSA: Does security checks on people wanting to board a flight originating in the US. Not involved at all in a flight originating overseas, other than defining rules for what can be carried aboard aircraft coming to the US. I get to deal extensively with them every time I want to board a flight due to my chrome-alloy steel prosthetic setting off their metal detectors.
State Department: Grants visas after vetting applicant and interviewing same. 10 year multi-entry visitor’s visas are not uncommon for citizens of friendly countries.
USCIS: Controls entry to the US and can deny entry to an individual who holds a valid visa from the State Department for any cause they consider appropriate. Mr. Knapp was probably a USCIS agent. USCIS agents also do the initial vetting of an applicant for immigration status before forwarding it to the State Department to grant a visa, as well as follow up monitoring of the immigrant and processing applications for citizenship.
USCBP: Controls what items/cargo enter the US. Responsible for detecting drugs, duty violations, etc. These are the agents who can confiscate your laptop if they consider it contain prohibitted material, such as child-porn.
Almost all the various individuals from these agencies I’ve dealt with have been courteous and professional. On rare occassions I’ve run into an individual who was on a power trip or didn’t know their own rules and regulations.
Cowboy is a compliment on January 6, 2009 at 11:17 AM
I’m just going by what Yon wrote, after subtracting the emotion. As Yon points out, there’s gotta be a tape/tapes somewhere — and the truth is on it. But just from the facts stated in Yon’s narrative, the agent did the right thing. “Counterproductive practices” are in the eye of the beholder. Again, had I been this agent, and presented with the facts Yon pointed out in the article, the woman would not have been admitted. In other words, I would have been a bigger a*hole in Yon’s estimation than the agent. I live in LA, one of the Thai slavery centers of the USA, and am perhaps just a little prejudiced by that fact.
And, if you get belligerent enough to ask for a supervisor, you are already in deep yogurt.
unclesmrgol on January 6, 2009 at 11:28 AM
Some of you folks here kill me… Your the very same people that will bitch and moan when the next 9/11 happens and some idiot TSA jerk had a bad day and just let the terrorist thru with no check… I’m sick to death of people so fricking whinny that every little inconvience or rude turd of a gate agent is a reason to blame someone, anyone… We just gotta love our law suits and crying over nothing. Get the hell over it people, it’s a new day, a new terrorist filled day. And they WANT TO KILL YOU, YOUR KIDS and ALL AMERICANS, reguardless of race, creed or color.
Geez, no wonder we can’t win a war anymore, we have a Nation full of wussies and complainers…
If we put this much effort into killing the terrorist bastards as some of you limp wristed morons here on this thread did worrying about one idiot guard. We’d be a lot safer.
Some of you make me ill and NOT proud to be an American. For God’s sake, look at what our parents went thru during WWI & WWII… The sacrifices, the pains, gas lines, rationing, blackouts, shartages, REAL HARDSHIP!!! not this made up garbage because one poor unlucky Woman who just happens to be a friend of some folks at HotAirs friend had a bad day at our Airports…
Whoop-De-Frekin-Do!
No wonder we lose elections, our side is just as stupid as the far left…
Mark Garnett on January 6, 2009 at 11:35 AM
If the activities of Knapp were illegal, Yon could sue that fellow personally. Knapp cannot hide under the guise of official duty if the acts he was committing were not legal.
JIMV on January 6, 2009 at 11:41 AM
Correction: Mr. Knapp was probably a USCBP agent, as they are the ones who allow enty at the border (in the airport) and can deny an individual with a valid visa entry for any reason they deem appropriate.
Cowboy is a compliment on January 6, 2009 at 11:42 AM
I have been crossing multiple border points into the US all of my life, sometimes through airports other times by land. I’ve traveled with and without visa since Canadians don’t need one to visit. The agents have a tough job and I always treat them with respect even when they act like king size pricks. These days, one wrong word or inconsistency earns you a “joyful” scrutiny side trip which is mainly tedious. Michael needs to let the agent do their job and not be emotional//offense taking or inflate the behavior of one individual into the status quo for Homeland Defense. I cut the agents a huge amount of slack and recommend it to one and all. Anybody who thinks their public privacy [almost non-existent on today's grid btw] is the same as their individual liberty needs to give their head a shake. Its a checkpoint and they check stuff there. Then you move on freely. Personally, if it keeps planes from blowing up mid-flight, keep up the good work.
jbutson on January 6, 2009 at 11:52 AM
Knappy-headed boor.
T J Green on January 6, 2009 at 11:57 AM
I understand that there are “Thai slave rings”; how do you propose that a single Thai woman, coming to the USA, with an (unneeded) return ticket, prove that she is not involved with such?
htom on January 6, 2009 at 12:14 PM
But wait!! Lord Messiah, the merciful and magnificent, Barack Obama wants to hire 600,000 MORE of these over officious jackasses to “stimulate”
govt growththe economy.yeah, just what we need. More buttheads working for a major butthead.
JP1986UM on January 6, 2009 at 12:38 PM
And we won’t even talk about it here or make any real objections to it… But heaven help us if one FOREIGN woman is delayed to keep my family safer… It’s WAR!
Mark Garnett on January 6, 2009 at 12:41 PM
I’d venture to guess that the reason that Ms. Aew got hassled was that her relationship to Michael Yon was what had gotten her flagged. There are quite a few folks in our government (on both sides) who really hate Yon.
Honest reporting about Iraq both on its successes and its failures is rare and totally unappreciated by many in DC and other government and political circles.
Whether its Congress, the Pentagon, the State Department, one of the Intel agencies, or just freinds of various folks in high places, Yon has made some serious enemies.
I suspect that under the new administration that not only Yon’s friends will find themsleves under the gun – maybe literally, but that Yon himself will find himself to be a target in every aspect that can be imagined. If Yon suddenly ends up dead or in some foreign jail, don’t be surprised.
Yon is a good man and as such he raises the ire of bad people who are easily inspired to make their displeasure known.
babylonandon on January 6, 2009 at 1:47 PM
Being vigilant is important, but this is not vigilance. From Yon´s description this man behaved in an unprofessional and insulting manner. I fail to see how acting like an idiot will protect us from another 9/11.
And don´t give me the old “there´s a war on” line. Just because a guy acts tough doesn´t mean he´s doing a good job. The government cannot even keep the terrorists at Guantanamo locked up but it can harrass tourists and professionals coming to the US? Reading her e-mails? What good did that do? This is just shameful.
el gordo on January 6, 2009 at 3:45 PM
First and foremost, the Department of Homeland Security and Customs and Border Protection do more than screen for terrorists, they also enforce the laws against illegal immigration. How much Aew weighs is irrelevant. CBP Officers can and are required to ask any and all questions relating to the purpose of a person’s visit, including about relationships with Americans, as many aliens seek to avoid immigration laws, like those requiring an immigrant visa if coming to the U.S. Everyone finds personal questions invasive, but those personal questions are relevant to a person’s intent, especially if they are young unmarried girls coming to visit their boyfriends.
Second, all aliens arriving at Ports-of-Entry are considered by law to be intending immigrants until the alien proves otherwise. That is the law and how CBP and the INS before it operated.
Third, DHS and CBP have no control over what an airline overseas requires of its passengers. To start out the story by blaming America first is foolish.
Fourth, CBP has the authority to search any arriving alien, including their computer. They have the authority to gather further evidence, such as can be found on their email, about their intentions in coming to the U.S.
Fifth, you would be surprised to learn that people lie to CBP officers.
Sixth, she did not have to surrrender that password. Surrendering the password showed evidence that she was not an intending immigrant.
Seventh, Thailand exports its women, either for marriage or work overseas. They are a source country for illegal immigration.
Eighth, again, CBP does more than look for terrorists, as a matter of fact, most of the illegal aliens they catch are not terrorists.
Nineth, having a visa is only a PERMIT to APPLY to enter the U.S., no matter how long the visa is valid for. Many Mexicans who immigrate illegally have ten year validity on their visas. It means nothing. CBP determines who is admitted to the U.S., not the State Department who issues visas, which are, again, only a permit to apply to enter the U.S.
Tenth, you people who complain about “rudeness” or “tough guy” obviously have never done the job of CBP Officer, or the legacy INS Immigration Inspector. Agressive questioning of aliens is a legal, moral and professional method of detecting fraud.
Eleventh, an Immigration Inspector was able to stop one of the 9/11 highjackers from entering the U.S. by being aggressive. It was those Inspectors who were not aggressive who are responsible for the others getting in.
Twelveth, you people only use 20/20 hindsight and the claim by Yon that nothing untword to U.S. immigration law was in the works. How do we know he was not just bringing his girlfriend to live with him or avoiding getting an immigration visa for a prospetive bride?
You people certainly turn liberal on a dime.
federale86 on January 6, 2009 at 4:33 PM
Sorry, but I’m with DHS on this one. I don’t care if they search the Pope, they can NEVER be too careful. This is the time when many foreigners want us dead. EVERYONE who flies has to understand the new rules since the Muslims ruined it for everyone 911.
PoliticallyIncorrectSandy on January 6, 2009 at 4:47 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3