Audio: Coulter claims NBC set her up
posted at 8:31 pm on January 5, 2009 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Six minutes from John Gibson’s radio show punctuated by the charge that they booked her fully intending all along to cancel at the last minute. Really? Just to slightly inconvenience her while doing the rounds of other morning talk shows?
Radical countertheory: They booked her intending to cancel but also fully intending to invite her back, knowing that Drudge could be relied on to hype the “controversy” so that her raincheck appearance would do huge ratings. Exit question: Was she in on it or not?
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
There’s a difference between calling someone a faggot (which I abhore) and making a joke which requires the word “faggot” because it’s a specific pop culture reference and zings John Edwards at the same time.
If the Grey’s Anatomy guy had said “doo-doo head,” the joke would have been that John Edwards was a “doo-doo head.”
It wasn’t a critical position statement; it was a joke, and not a bad one, in my opinion, given the context.
Kensington on January 5, 2009 at 10:09 PM
IT DOES NOT appear people listen very well. Read her stuff instead of concentrating on her comments designed to raise the ire of the enemy. She is not about name calling.
Jamson64 on January 5, 2009 at 10:09 PM
I’ll read the book Goodless, too ;)
terryannonline on January 5, 2009 at 10:09 PM
My Grandpa always said “A fair fight is when you have a bigger club than the other guy”.
thomasaur on January 5, 2009 at 10:10 PM
She didn’t call him that; she made a joke that was uncomfortable for people about political correctness (ie have to go to rehab). The idea she called him that is just the spin.
It’s kind of like the spin the media is rolling out now to paint Rush as racist. It’s absurd.
Spirit of 1776 on January 5, 2009 at 10:10 PM
Ann is a fearless, wonderful, terrible, attractive, witty, take-no-prisoners conservative warrior. She is that primordial, passionate, scream from the world beyond, a 1,000 folded sword of pure truth and light on the right so bright we only see the cancer she exposes although not that which her brightness blinds us from.
When Michael and the original silent majority went medieval and threw Lucifer the smackdown, I can imagine at least one of his loyal and ruthless followers lookin like Ann but with wings.
Imagine a different scene in Eden as a beatiful Eve skips through the garden in delight and meeting her Maker. “I found this long thin animal in the forbidden tree my Lord. It thought to get me to eat the fruit. Silly thing. It tastes like chicken.”
Sapwolf on January 5, 2009 at 10:10 PM
Good grief, did you think she was serious? She was making a point. As I noted before sarcasm is an art.
Cindy Munford on January 5, 2009 at 10:10 PM
Gee, just imagine what people would say if she wrote stuff like Jonathan Swift, comparing Democratic policies to cannibalism….
klickink.wordpress.com on January 5, 2009 at 10:11 PM
Bravo!
But, too late.
Liberty is dead…
klickink.wordpress.com on January 5, 2009 at 10:12 PM
Here’s the deal, as I see it: Even the dreaded John Edwards incident – and if you read the transcript, it could have been an Al Gore joke or even an Obama joke, as it wasn’t about Edwards but about Isaiah Washington’s road to PC-Damascus – was funny. Her books are written exceptionally well (says the unqualified non-expert) and, like her columns, are spot-on.
I never understood the “She’s such a screeching, hateful flamethrower!” thing. I can think of two instances where she might have been over-the-line, and one of those was at Susan Estrich, that saint who called her Soulless and wrote a book about how crazy Ann Coulter is (if you can call it a book).
emailnuevo on January 5, 2009 at 10:14 PM
Yes he is, and very very shrewd.
allrsn on January 5, 2009 at 10:14 PM
President Reagan had a way of calling someone an idiot and they wouldn’t realize it until five minutes after he left the room. He did it with good humor and smile on his face.
It is not the time for Conservatives to be wishy-washy. Lukewarm water serves no purpose. If you want to be a Liberal, be a Liberal. If you want to be a Conservative, be a Conservative. If you want to be a Moderate, then go which ever way the wind blows ‘ya.
kingsjester on January 5, 2009 at 10:15 PM
That’s what YOU think, but ’cause you apparently don’t understand true satire. She is a legitimate commentator. Read early American pamphlets – read Swift, for God’s sake.
You know, sometimes you just have to pick up a club and swing for what’s right.
SIt there an be polite and hold your nose up in the air all you want, because doing that just shows you really have no conviction of your beliefs.
klickink.wordpress.com on January 5, 2009 at 10:16 PM
I am sensing your depressed. Come on this is the United States, perk up.
Cindy Munford on January 5, 2009 at 10:16 PM
At the risk of getting my a$$ kicked ……ditto to both Gina and Terry. She’s abrasive and she does push the envelope over the edge way to many times.
But before I bend over for that kick, I have bought and read all of her books and her latest is on it’s way tomorrow from Amazon. I think she’s a great writer, with pure conservative views and I’ve learned alot from her, but geeze, she needs to tone it down sometimes.
I guess I just prefer the Newt Gingrich type who’s able to speak with a little more thought and control.
Knucklehead on January 5, 2009 at 10:17 PM
I add: Does anyone here really think that, without Coulter, we’d be painted like friendly little teddy bears? William F. Buckley’s first book was compared to a cross-burning by the Klan.
They don’t call Ann Coulter “mean” and “caustic” because she is; they call her that based solely on the fact that she’s conservative. This is why they’ve been doing character assassination on her since the Clinton years, and on our side since at least 1955.
emailnuevo on January 5, 2009 at 10:17 PM
We need to banish Coulter as she scares the political middle.
If we only had a candidate that attracted the middle we would win.
/sarc
Jamson64 on January 5, 2009 at 10:17 PM
Now that’s what I like to hear.
Cindy Munford on January 5, 2009 at 10:18 PM
not until the guns are all confiscated, the happiness gestapo is real and people don’t cheat Federal rules they find onerous with glee….
that day comes I will learn to speak Mexiploitan and become a cross border guerilla probably….
using pamphlets rather than pistols but a guerilla naytheless.
sven10077 on January 5, 2009 at 10:18 PM
Now this is pure genius….
AprilOrit on January 5, 2009 at 10:19 PM
We need Ann and even stronger wags than Ann.
She makes points that would never be heard from the mealy mouthed, ‘reach across the aisle’, centrist wimps that pass themselves off as Republicans. They shudder at the prospect of making waves but don’t notice that a radical leftist ‘community organizer’ just stole the pie.
Think of Juan out there commenting…like the last campaign! UGH!
BTW, I do read her stuff.
IlikedAUH2O on January 5, 2009 at 10:21 PM
I love Newt but he serves a different purpose. He’s an idea man, Ann’s an enforcer. I don’t think you will see Ann sit on a sofa with Nancy Pelosi discussing Global BS but I understand that Newt did because he doesn’t want to be locked out of the discussion.
Cindy Munford on January 5, 2009 at 10:21 PM
As evidenced by Newt’s haste to condemn Rush’s parody of Sharpton. Pity he didn’t trouble with the facts then. As Rush said, even Obama laughed it off.
Spirit of 1776 on January 5, 2009 at 10:21 PM
And the Newt types eventually, inevitably go south on something ridiculous like global warming. Happens every time.
Excellent point. It’s a waste of time trying to comport yourself in a way that will make you immune from being labeled a hater. Vote yes on Proposition 8? You’re a hater! Support protecting the unborn? You’re a hater!
Kensington on January 5, 2009 at 10:22 PM
You should read the comments on YouTube vids regarding her. Some of the “men” call her a tranny!
And look who the NAZI BROADCASTING COMPANY REPLACED HER WITH..QUEER ICON DU JOUR PEREZ HILTON, WHO ACCORDING TO WND OFFERED $1,000 TO ANYONE WHO WOULD THROW A PIE AT HER! I WOULD LIKE TO THROW A BIG COW CHIP PIE ON CROCKAFELLER CENTER!!!!!!!!!!!
BobAnthony on January 5, 2009 at 10:22 PM
Coulter has a personality defect that sometimes causes her to go too far because she gets off on the negative attention it gets her. That tendency is unfortunate but more than made up for by the sustained clear reasoning, large quantities of evidence and close adherence to core principles found in her books. And her books are full of subtle humor. Most every other conservative writer is boring in comparison to AC.
snaggletoothie on January 5, 2009 at 10:22 PM
No, they do that to her all the time. They will ask her a question and then one or two jerks will not let her answer beyond a word or two. Then, she will do the same back to them. She has a loud voice and she just keeps talking so no one can hear them. They, of course, go bonkers and she keep repeating “You did it to me and now I’m doing it to you.”
It’s hilarious how they get so angry after they did it to her first. lol! Love it!
Blake on January 5, 2009 at 10:22 PM
Someone tell AprilOstitt that the left abhors religion. At least the Christian brand. Not third world enough, I guess.
IlikedAUH2O on January 5, 2009 at 10:24 PM
No kidding. They never fight her in the arena of ideas, but seek to take something out of context. Example, of her entire book, a side comment about 9/11 widows – who had become famous as a result of 9/11 – was the only point of discussion in interviews about that book. Always the attempt at character assassination. I’m glad she doesn’t stand for it, and I enjoy the witty responses.
Spirit of 1776 on January 5, 2009 at 10:24 PM
Ooh, yeah, I missed that one somehow. That was wonderful!
Kensington on January 5, 2009 at 10:25 PM
Face it. Ann Coulter is the best.
D2Boston on January 5, 2009 at 10:27 PM
Yeah those would be the super scary smart liberals who don’t know that some girls have adam’s apples, too. Liberals spend far too much time around trannies, and they get confused on this point.
Kensington on January 5, 2009 at 10:28 PM
+1
I’ll give you that one Spirit, I’m still nursing the bruise on my a$$ when I fell of the couch when I heard Newt say that. Ouch!
Knucklehead on January 5, 2009 at 10:29 PM
I remember having to dig to find the Edwards f*gg*t thing because the MSM would report what she supposedly said but I wanted to see it for myself. So I finally saw the clip on Brietbart,I think and it was totally misrepresented… no the MSM out and out lied about what she said…
CCRWM on January 5, 2009 at 10:30 PM
Sometimes I think Ann Coulter is a liberal pretending to be a conservative because she is just so outlandish that I think it’s like Stephen Colbert pretending to be conservative pundit on his show.
terryannonline on January 5, 2009 at 10:33 PM
Tell me yourself, oh I forgot that’s too hard for you.
AprilOrit on January 5, 2009 at 10:33 PM
Terry that is why you need to read her stuff
Jamson64 on January 5, 2009 at 10:34 PM
Just think of Ann Coulter like “Jane the Baptist.” A voice crying in the wilderness.
Mojave Mark on January 5, 2009 at 10:35 PM
Hum… maybe at this point you should just let it go???
CCRWM on January 5, 2009 at 10:36 PM
Obviously I hit a nerve…LOL.
AprilOrit on January 5, 2009 at 10:36 PM
As Jamson says, this is a problem you can easily solve.
Yeah, I’m not trying to praise her by putting down Newt, but I have grown more of the opinion that most commentators in the public sphere are jockeying for position – and the ones at the top of their respective fields, Rush and Ann, get undue criticism from otherwise rational people – such as Newt or even Michelle. Noonan/Parker vs. Palin is an extreme example. Principles take second place.
Spirit of 1776 on January 5, 2009 at 10:38 PM
Most times we need a Palin…sometimes we deserve a Coulter… sort of like you know we needed a shot of whisky after the election results…
CCRWM on January 5, 2009 at 10:39 PM
Just like Ann Coulter…..
terryannonline on January 5, 2009 at 10:40 PM
And you bring up one of the biggest attention whores on the planet…
Nice….
BigWyo on January 5, 2009 at 10:41 PM
Great idea for a T-shirt
thomasaur on January 5, 2009 at 10:41 PM
That’s just mystifying. You’re really just determined not to get her, aren’t you?
Kensington on January 5, 2009 at 10:51 PM
Ann Coulter always makes her point with sarcasm and jokes. People are always getting offended, because they don’t have enough of a sense of humor to get the joke, and take it seriously and personally.
The John Edwards incident is a case in point. She was making a joke about how an un-PC comment like “faggot” led Isaiah Washington to go to rehab (!?!) Naturally, John Edwards was the perfect target.
She said herself that her choice of the word “faggot” was because it was such a “schoolyard taunt.” In other words, not a name to take very seriously. I mean, who runs around calling people faggots on national TV?
It was a joke. Sarcastic and pointed, but a joke.
ThereGoesTheNeighborhood on January 5, 2009 at 10:52 PM
Seriously, you really should watch less videos like that and read some of her books. The woman who wrote that song doesn’t understand, either. Ann’s point about “perfection” re Christianity can not honestly be boiled down to “be like me.”
Christianity is really a very humble thing, but the songwriter thinks that it’s Ann just promoting Ann. So silly.
Kensington on January 5, 2009 at 10:55 PM
Terry Ann
Would you post this many comments about someone you had read? All you’re writing about is your feelings. One post might be sufficient for that.
snaggletoothie on January 5, 2009 at 10:58 PM
Seriously, you don’t think there’s a reason why she’s so easily parodied?
terryannonline on January 5, 2009 at 10:59 PM
Anyone in the mood for a good belly laugh can check out this video of Bill Richardson battling to bridge the gap between his inconsistent views and then fleeing the scene when he can no longer explain himself. If you have the time, check out the rest of this guy’s interviews on his youtube channel. Its a smorgasbord of hilarity as he brings intellectual shame to star dems such as: Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Barney Frank, Tom Daschle, Charlie Rangel, Alan Colmes, George Stephanopoulis, and other liberal favorites as they attempt to defend their twisted illogical views. Once I started watching the videos I couldn’t stop. If you are in a bad mood, it will lift your spirits.
http://www.youtube.com/user/janhelfeld
NeverLiberal on January 5, 2009 at 11:04 PM
You consider it a parody because it plays into your preconception of what she is.
You would do better to note that parody’s of her are well received on the left (note the link you provide) because they cannot refute her ideas, nor do they understand conservatism. The oldest trick on the playground is to mock people that make you feel small/stupid/etc. Ann repeated points out that the Emperor has no clothes – if I were the left, I’d want to strike out at her too. Whether with comments about looks, or Christianity, or whatever.
Spirit of 1776 on January 5, 2009 at 11:05 PM
She’s not easily parodied, at least not effectively. If you think that video was an effective parody, that only shows how little you really know regarding Ann Coulter. I’m sorry, but that’s the truth. Every lefty who can run around screaming “TRANNY! LOOK AT HIS ADAM’S APPLE!” thinks he just “parodied” Ann Coulter.
Kensington on January 5, 2009 at 11:07 PM
As usual Allah knows what he is doing by posting this and making just the right comments to set it off. With that said the commenters crack me up. Conservatives are our own worst enemy. We are currently in the position we are in now because we are unwilling to get our hands dirty to win. If more of you came off of your “high” horses and get in the trenches and do a little hooking and jabbing like Ann does we would probably be doing just fine. The left unashamedly does what it has to do to win. Therefore they won and these days will continue to win until the right has the balls to fight back. We just handed them Minnesota without any fight. Good job Republicans. Bunch of pansies. I am ashamed. We shouldn’t be walking lockstep, but we should at least be on the same page.
gator70 on January 5, 2009 at 11:10 PM
Hockey analogy:
Gretzky/McSorley
Our elected officials are the ones with the skills (Wayne Gretzky), but in order for them to operate efficiently, they need an enforcer with them on the ice(Marty McSorley).
Although his skills have waned, GWB is the skillsmith and Annie (gotta luv her) is the enforcer.
StatenItaly08 on January 5, 2009 at 11:10 PM
I use to detest Ann also. But, when a friend of mine gave me her first book. It was nothing like she is on TV. If I know she is going to be on TV. I don’t watch her. She is different. Her books are incredible, very humorous. And the research that she does before she publishes any thing is very impressing. There are some things that still bug me about her. I don’t detest her anymore though. As I am writing this I see sven10077’s comment. And yes sven, we do at times on here get mean, dirty, vulgar as the leftoids. But, at times that may be the only way to get a point across to them. To jar them or wake them up. You don’t get better with being nicer. Being nicer seems to get it worse. You are right on your comment. But at times shock is a good tactic. The Libs are to stupid to understand logic and fairness.
sheebe on January 5, 2009 at 11:14 PM
Look I understand that there are cutting political satirists on both sides. I actually think Bill Maher is worst than Ann Coulter. However, that doesn’t mean I have to like her. It’s not my cup of tea, that’s all.
terryannonline on January 5, 2009 at 11:16 PM
I like Ann Coulter. I realize she does go too far at times, but she’s willing to say what many of us are already thinking, and she’s not afraid to do it. I admire that.
Vegi on January 5, 2009 at 11:21 PM
This is like comparing apples and horses’ asses’. You view her at a satirist, again, because of ignorance. Read a book (heck, try reading some columns if a book is too much for you), but in her books you will find conservative principles presented with humor. Not satire for it’s own sake. She is an author that is also funny.
Spirit of 1776 on January 5, 2009 at 11:24 PM
Oh ok, you’re right – you got me on that one….
AprilOrit on January 5, 2009 at 11:31 PM
If she were blogging here and you didn’t know it was her I have a feeling that you would become fast friends, after reading some of your posts.
thomasaur on January 5, 2009 at 11:34 PM
Aaahhh, shame on you Allah – for not allowing us Conservatives to
and tell it like it is just like Coulter does by calling others hateful names like pansey and f*gg*t and for not permitting us to get our hands dirty….
Now that takes balls….you should be ashamed of yourself for posting this and setting it off.
Not.
AprilOrit on January 5, 2009 at 11:45 PM
I notice some, such as AprilOrit–and Allahpundit, as well, given his derisive use of ‘obligatory’ whenever he feels he’s catering to the knuckle-dragging unwashed–can barely contain their scorn for Coulter and her abrasive, rough and tumble style, and deride others, such as gator70, for advocating a gloves-off approach against a largely unscrupulous opposition. By all means, stay happy on the moral high ground and follow the surefire McCain strategy of losing honorably. Seems to me, though, you’re deceiving yourselves about the nature of honor and fair play. ‘Honor’ does not mean ‘nice’. ‘Fair play’ does not mean playing to lose.
troyriser_gopftw on January 5, 2009 at 11:57 PM
I hate to be the one to say this, but Ann Coulter is shrill and annoying. She’s a really poor replacement for Barbara Olsen, who had actual talent.
Illinidiva on January 6, 2009 at 12:00 AM
Ann Coulter rocks…
Newt “I’m God’s gift to the GOP” Gingrich sucks…
Keemo on January 6, 2009 at 12:03 AM
On the back of Ann Coulter’s latest book, “Guilty”, she mocks the media as “literally wanted to have sex with him [Obama].” She ate Colmes for dinner tonight.
He, and his brood, are some of the most dangerous people to this country.
p.s. lillies are indignant, again.
Entelechy on January 6, 2009 at 12:19 AM
Complete statement from the back of Ann’s latest book
“The media wanted to screw Obama, but only in the sense that they really wanted to have sex with him.”
Terry, if you haven’t read her books, you’re commenting on 5% of the person. She has a gift which most of us will never attain, the gift of the pen, which is so much more powerful than any sword.
Entelechy on January 6, 2009 at 1:02 AM
Very good point and so true.
Years ago the GOP worked hard to exorcise Far Right Loons like Coulter from the Party.
And you are rather high-hattedly presumptuous about who’s deceiving who.
Honor and playing fair? Ann Coulter could care less about either, she only cares about her own fame game, period.
Just because she can read the best of them like some kind of a female Mr. Blackwell/Don Rickles character – throwing out insults and quips to them thar scary Mad Libs – doesn’t make her a good example for anyone, let alone Conservatives.
I remember the time Laura Ingraham and Michelle were flabbergasted by the way Ann was defending Snoop Dog, like he was an authority on ahem, hos.
No real Conservative woman would ever defend someone like him or use someone like that as an example to prove a valid point.
She is interested in one thing and one thing only – working that shock value and promoting Ann Coulter – and nothing more.
If your fantasy is all about Ann Coulter as The Pied Piper – it’s your thing.
But the rest of us are not required to follow.
She is no Barbara Olsen.
AprilOrit on January 6, 2009 at 1:06 AM
Ann’s book, Godless, was better than any other conservative book that I’ve read, including O’Reilly’s, Hannity’s and Ingraham’s. Her book would cause me to first exclaim “Amen!”, then laugh, then read paragraphs to my wife. A few months later, my wife read it and had the same reaction! So we essentially read it together — twice! I’ll get her current book and look forward to her truth, her wit and her courage in being politically incorrect. Thanks Ann. Even if your next book were a dud, which of course is absurd, we’d buy it just to show our appreciation.
And the previous comments are right: if you haven’t read her books, you don’t know Ann Coulter.
Christian Conservative on January 6, 2009 at 1:22 AM
Well, I was going to wait to buy her book on the Amazon Marketplace before picking it up (most of her books are a steal at $0.01), but I guess I’ll buy it now.
El_Terrible on January 6, 2009 at 1:23 AM
Exactly, the reason she gets the trannie analogy. She’s like a old bitter queen sitting in a bar stool taking everyone’s inventory when they walk through the door….with her copy of the Queens Venacular spitting out those nasty comments like nobody’s business.
And they hate it that she’s compared to them…LOL.
It’s amazing that real Conservatives, let alone Christians, would think that kind of trash talking was moral or honorable.
AprilOrit on January 6, 2009 at 1:30 AM
Ann, on Barbara Olson, who’s smiling upon Ann.
Inferiority, moral superiority, nagging wives and naiveté are consulting for which to be more indignant.
Entelechy on January 6, 2009 at 1:40 AM
i thought ann coulter had no idea what she was talking about and just spouted random nonsense to be an attention whore, then i found debbie schlussel’s blog, and learned what a real attention whore is.
lolwut on January 6, 2009 at 1:48 AM
My Grandfather said that if you were in a fair fight, that you were not fighting to win.
Johan Klaus on January 6, 2009 at 1:57 AM
.
That was then.
Now, I don’t think she would be. I think she would have written Coulter off as a self involved media wh*re.
And she dates Liberals.
Barbara would have never approved of that or of wearing a black cocktail dress at 10 in the morning. She had more class than that.
AprilOrit on January 6, 2009 at 2:06 AM
Bad word.
Johan Klaus on January 6, 2009 at 2:06 AM
wh*re.
AprilOrit on January 6, 2009 at 2:06 AM
Another bad word.
Johan Klaus on January 6, 2009 at 2:08 AM
Do I see a trend?
Johan Klaus on January 6, 2009 at 2:09 AM
She does not go far enough. I am tired of this PC world, where the media will not call a terrorist a terrorist.
Johan Klaus on January 6, 2009 at 2:15 AM
Only if you are desparately searching for one…..
AprilOrit on January 6, 2009 at 2:37 AM
Ann Coulter’s books are very well researched and documented. I plan to buy her latest one this week–they are always good.
***
She looked very nice on T.V. tonight–I think Fox does a good makeup job. And her long blond hair and slim frame go well with a small black dress.
***
I liked her good ducking of the pies thrown at her at one of her appearances a few years ago. Ditto for President Bush–too bad the pie throwers didn’t get the Iraqi security force treatment used on the shoe thrower!
***
John Bibb
rocketman on January 6, 2009 at 3:03 AM
Bunch of pansies. I am ashamed. We shouldn’t be walking lockstep, but we should at least be on the same page.
gator70 on January 5
Good point but how can we be on the same page if liberal/moderate Repubs and Conservatives aren’t even using the same book?
SKYFOX on January 6, 2009 at 5:50 AM
The one time I thought Ann went over the line was when she did the much reported “Jersey Wives enjoying their husbands deaths” thing.
That’s it.
The only time.
In a world where the purveyors of “tolerance” have nothing bad to say about Jihadis beheading and raping, Prop 8 opponents assaulting old ladies and mailing out white powder to churches, t-shirts calling Sarah Palin the c-word, and a movie depicting the assassination of a sitting president…
Yeah, I’m not too inclined to get upset about Ann Coulter.
She’s spot on 99% of the time, and tells it like it is.
As others have commented, it wouldn’t matter how nice she behaved.
She’s a conservative, and must be destroyed.
This is a culture war.
Emphasis on the the word WAR.
Ann understands this, and acts accordingly.
Hawkins1701 on January 6, 2009 at 6:26 AM
april is a hardcore delusional liberal who thinks conservatives are so stupid that she can come to a conservative blog and win us over through her brilliant reasoning. She is a hardcore, manhattan liberal, folks.
peacenprosperity on January 6, 2009 at 6:28 AM
I think you confused me with another poster, I didn’t fall for the Edwards mess. I was talking about Ann supposed support of Hillary Clinton during the primaries to show her distaste for Sen. McCain being the Republican nominee.
Cindy Munford on January 6, 2009 at 6:28 AM
Check that post out. She is spewing hatred and jealousy, the lifeblood of kneejerk liberals.
peacenprosperity on January 6, 2009 at 6:31 AM
Thank for stopping in and letting us know what real conservatives are. I can appreciate a person’s talents and I expect NO ONE to be a Pied Piper anymore than I would expect anyone to follow one. I think it is fine that you don’t care for her and we all miss Barbara Olson but I am confused why you feel you can speak for her. A black cocktail dress (or sheath depending on who is describing it) at 10 a.m., the horrors!!!
Cindy Munford on January 6, 2009 at 6:34 AM
The only thing wrong with what she said was that I said it here three weeks before she said it on TV.
Has mccain proved Ann wrong during the campaign and since?
peacenprosperity on January 6, 2009 at 6:34 AM
April’s dislike of AC is indicative of something. Could it be jealousy? Adams Apple and all AC is far more attractive than a whine , bitchy, and envious woman anytime.
Jamson64 on January 6, 2009 at 6:40 AM
Don’t be afraid; there are lots of lilly livered types here who can’t abide Coulter.
Jaibones on January 6, 2009 at 8:17 AM
He (April is a gay guy) uses the rhetoric of the dKos, DU crowd.
Jaibones on January 6, 2009 at 8:18 AM
Ann’s on “Fox and Friends” right now. She is saying that NBC has made several excuses.
kingsjester on January 6, 2009 at 8:19 AM
Jaibones on January 6, 2009 at 8:18 AM
Are you serious about April? I just found out the other day that noneya is a female.
kingsjester on January 6, 2009 at 8:21 AM
I think her adam’s apple is growing.
Vernon Hardapple on January 6, 2009 at 8:22 AM
“a victim of their suckuppery”! Classic Ann Coulter and I love it! Those of you who claim to be conservative but fear engaging liberals in verbal debate as does Ann should simply leave the field! Cowards always exist but the GOP will get nowhere if they continue to be swayed by them!
sabbott on January 6, 2009 at 8:36 AM
I like the comment above comparing Democratic politics to cannabalism. A starting point for interesting thoughts. It puts me in mind of the RI Legislature(I used to live there). In spite of that State’s on-going economic difficulties, I read that there is not one single Republican in that body. The Democrats have devoured them. But, to be fair, they will also eat their own if necessary. (So, apparently, does the GOP now)
jeanie on January 6, 2009 at 8:45 AM
NBC must be afraid Ann’s presence will dull the feathers of Obama’s pet peacock.
TimBuk3 on January 6, 2009 at 9:07 AM
Has he/she confirmed that? I think she has made statements in the feminine direction and writes like a teenage girl. Actually, now that I think about it, you could be correct. Maybe april is a typical, confused, middle aged male resident of grenwich village.
peacenprosperity on January 6, 2009 at 9:57 AM
That’s not what the comment was actually about…
Jonathan Swift wrote “A Modest Proposal” satirizing the politics of his day, by famously proposing that the Irish simply eat their children as a response to their ongoing famines and population growth.
I think the comment in this thread was meant to say something like “Imagine the outrage if Ann Coulter indulged in the kind of scathing satire used in the past by revered social commentators like Swift.” It was not a direct, or even indirect, comparison of Democrat politics to cannibalism, although such a comparison would not be completely unreasonable at the current time, IMHO.
drunyan8315 on January 6, 2009 at 10:02 AM
To be read by AprilOstitt: “Ape-ril, I just don’t want you to waste your question.”
For everyone else:
I asked someone else to speak to AprilOstitt about her dumb analogy between Ann and the serpent in Eden since I resist taking a contrary opinion and directly converse with souls who have no hope of winning a debate with me. That means Ostitt.
IlikedAUH2O on January 6, 2009 at 10:38 AM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 Next »