Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Democrats may block Burris from seat — physically

posted at 1:15 pm on January 2, 2009 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Let’s hope so, if only for the comedy gold of Bobby Rush accusing Harry Reid afterwards of standing in the schoolhouse door.

Burris will not be allowed on the Senate floor, according to this aide and a Senate Democratic leadership aide.

The aide familiar with Senate Democratic leaders’ plans said if Burris tries to enter the Senate chamber, the Senate doorkeeper will stop Burris. If Burris were to persist, either trying to force his way onto the Senate floor or refusing to leave and causing a scene, U.S. Capitol Police would stop him, said the aide.

“They (police) probably won’t arrest him” but they would call the sergeant-at-arms,” the aide said.

When asked about what would happen if he shows up and tries to be seated, Burris told the Chicago Tribune that he’s, “not going to create a scene in Washington.” He added, “We hope it’s negotiated out prior to my going to Washington.”

An intriguing subplot, per CNN: They can’t block governors from the floor, so if Blagojevich decides to bring the circus to town, their options are either to let him in or adjourn until he goes away (or is impeached by the state legislature, of course). As amazing to me as his narcissism is, though, I’m almost as amazed at Burris’s shamelessness in enabling him. Surely he knows he’s being used by Blago to make his Democratic enemies choke on the racial politics of the appointment; surely he understands the grief this is causing Obama and the party. At least one other black Democrat in Illinois was offered the appointment but was too honorable to accept, declaring tactfully that, ahem, “Roland was a bit braver than I am.” Such is Burris’s “bravery” that he’s now prepared to endure a court battle if need be, just to put an extra line on that mausoleum wall. “[H]e’s at least six parts ego to one part performance,” said one Trib columnist yesterday; if it’s true that the ratio’s only six to one, his performance must be stratospheric.

Consensus legal opinion is that Reid’s stuck with him, but see Slate for a contrarian view arguing that the Senate’s constitutionally entitled to examine the fairness of appointments. I like the idea near the end of passing a resolution now stating that Burris will be expelled by a two-thirds vote even if he wins in court. All 50 Senate Democrats signed a letter to Blago a few weeks ago warning him not to appoint anyone; presumably the nine new members soon to be seated feel the same way. Surely they can find eight Republicans to make it happen.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

At least if Reid keeps this guy cooling his heals in the new Capitol Visitor’s Center, he won’t be stinking up the joint this summer.

Watching Harry Reid trying to do his job is like watching a monkey trying to make sweet love to a football.

Bask in the glory, Democrats, these are the people you put into office.

NoDonkey on January 2, 2009 at 1:19 PM

Somebody call in the Justice Brothers (Jesse and Al). This is going to be great.

This must be the “Hope and Change” Barry was talking about.

kingsjester on January 2, 2009 at 1:19 PM

Priceless. I believe the democrats are going to make 2009 a year to remember.

bopbottle on January 2, 2009 at 1:19 PM

Harry Reid, atop the Capitol Dome, watching the approach of Burris: “The new Senator is a n***er!”

Spectators: “What did he say?”

Dick Durbin: “He said the new Senator is near!”

Bonus points for those who guess the movie reference.

Jim62sch on January 2, 2009 at 1:21 PM

Is Sen Bird going to dress the part?

tarpon on January 2, 2009 at 1:21 PM

Man am I gonna be glued to C-span next week with lots of popcorn cause this is going to be better than the Emmy’s.

tee866 on January 2, 2009 at 1:23 PM

“This must be the “Hope and Change” Barry was talking about.”

I think at this point Barry’s thinking “What the hell have I got myself into”?

I mean really, this guy ran for President for the publicity and to avoid having to do anything in the Senate.

Now he’s President.

Congress is controlled by complete idiots, all of his own party, so there’s no making excuses.

I wouldn’t be surprised if Obama just resigns on January 21st “to spend more time with my family”.

Be careful of what you wish for, Barry.

NoDonkey on January 2, 2009 at 1:23 PM

This is fun to watch. This may be that schadenfraude of which they speak.

continue as you were, Blago. This is the most fun y’all have been since the Barackopolis.

mjk on January 2, 2009 at 1:24 PM

Jim62sch on January 2, 2009 at 1:21 PM

That was Blazing Saddles, another comedy.

This live action comedy may be even funnier.

kingsjester on January 2, 2009 at 1:24 PM

Jim62sch

Blazing Saddles and who would guess an ass could ride a horse?

NoDonkey on January 2, 2009 at 1:24 PM

This is good daytime drama.

mindhacker on January 2, 2009 at 1:24 PM

if it’s true that the ratio’s only six to one, his performance must be stratospheric.

Allah, your wit never ceases to amaze me.

txsurveyor on January 2, 2009 at 1:24 PM

Jim62sch on January 2, 2009 at 1:21 PM
Blazing Saddles is such a timeless movie isn’t it.

tee866 on January 2, 2009 at 1:25 PM

Surely he knows he’s being used by Blago to make his Democratic enemies choke on the racial politics of the appointment; surely he understands the grief this is causing Obama and the party.

“The Obama people won’t play ball

[...]

&^%$! For nothing? &^%$ him!”

I believe this is where Blagojevich makes good on his word.

BKennedy on January 2, 2009 at 1:28 PM

Will Hollywood producers step to the plate and make a new movie? Mr. Burris Goes to Washinton

Rovin on January 2, 2009 at 1:28 PM

Here is what Barry will be singing to Michelle after Jan. 20:

Clowns to the left of me (Chicago),
Jokers to the right (New York),
Here I am, stuck in the middle with you.

kingsjester on January 2, 2009 at 1:28 PM

Blazing Saddles is such a timeless movie isn’t it.

tee866 on January 2, 2009 at 1:25 PM

I watched it on one of the movie channels the other day, and they had bleeped out all instances of the n-word, even when used by the black characters. The movie just wasn’t the same. I told a friend of mine about this, and he said that TV Land (or someone like that) had done the same thing with “Sanford and Son”.

How dumb is it that they bleep it out from movies and TV shows that ridicule racism, but leave that word in popular music that celebrates racism and misogyny?

Jim62sch on January 2, 2009 at 1:30 PM

Wonderful. Now I need to go make a popcorn run.

All 50 Senate Democrats signed a letter to Blago a few weeks ago warning him not to appoint anyone; presumably the nine new members soon to be seated feel the same way. Surely they can find eight Republicans to make it happen.

Republicans should just vote “present” on this one. No need to make things easier for the Democrats.

rbj on January 2, 2009 at 1:31 PM

If this plays out, highest C-Span ratings evah.

Mr. D on January 2, 2009 at 1:31 PM

you can’t male this up. Just Love it.

rob verdi on January 2, 2009 at 1:32 PM

You know what they say, ‘Live by the identity politics, die by the identity politics’.

LastRick on January 2, 2009 at 1:32 PM

I don’t think Burris will literally go to the door without it being resolved. Sure is fun to watch, though.

This is what naked ambition looks like, God help us all.

cs89 on January 2, 2009 at 1:32 PM

That will make for good television.

t.ferg on January 2, 2009 at 1:34 PM

Harry Reid’s going to need dogs and firehoses. And I’m going to need popcorn.

Cicero43 on January 2, 2009 at 1:37 PM

It is incredibly interesting seeing the Democrats eat their own. No Republican needs to dirty their hands on this at all. Poor Obama…his party unity is imploding and he’s not even sworn in yet.

kanda on January 2, 2009 at 1:39 PM

you can’t male this up. Just Love it.

Schadenfreudian slip?

B26354 on January 2, 2009 at 1:39 PM

An intriguing subplot, per CNN: They can’t block governors from the floor, so if Blagojevich decides to bring the circus to town, their options are either to let him in or adjourn until he goes away (or is impeached by the state legislature, of course).

The idea of the Senate being shut down rather than allow Blagojevich on the floor is almost enough to have me pay his way to Washington.

EvilBob333 on January 2, 2009 at 1:41 PM

Repeating myself from Ace’s place: The Dems won’t wimp out the way GOP would (and has). The Dems will just show their ownership papers and that will be that.

baldilocks on January 2, 2009 at 1:42 PM

And in other news, deceased Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall rolls over in his grave. Back to you Connie.

The Race Card on January 2, 2009 at 1:42 PM

Put a poster of Hillary at the door. That should stop him.

man this is just crazy. Thanks Dems.

johnnyU on January 2, 2009 at 1:43 PM

There’s a black man stealing my show!

The Race Card on January 2, 2009 at 1:45 PM

Isn’t the Senate sargeant at arms an old Illinois LEO/pol who served when Burris was IL AG?

a capella on January 2, 2009 at 1:45 PM

Senators all have ID pins. If they don’t issue one to Burris it would probably be illegal for him to enter the chamber. Also he couldn’t vote unless they give him one of those cards that go into the machine. So there might not be any point in him even going to DC.
The constitution gives each house final say over their own membership. I don’t see how any judge could find grounds to pass judgment on a decision by the senate.

snaggletoothie on January 2, 2009 at 1:46 PM

I agree this is fascinating to watch. =)

However, I’m gonna again stray from the Hot Air general population and say that I agree with the Democratic leadership for once on this particular stance. They are right to make an issue about this and they are right to stick to their guns. Maybe the fact that they are showing a little moral backbone right now isn’t such a bad thing. After all, that’s a pretty rare thing to watch these days. =)

Summer on January 2, 2009 at 1:46 PM

I would like to extend a laurel and hearty handshake to our new……nagger…..

Set phasers to stun Harry. Let the clown circus begin.

DeweyWins on January 2, 2009 at 1:46 PM

OK, had to include a video link:

The Senate Democratic Caucus welcomes Roland Burris

Bonus: Nancy Pelosi welcomes Roland Burris to Congress

Jim62sch on January 2, 2009 at 1:51 PM

This is typical Harry Reid.

This is a 100% self-inflicted injury. He could simply have said, “The Governor has the right to make the appointment. We have no jurisdiction.”

Instead, he made a bad situation worse.

And he did all this with his eyes wide open.

Reid makes a box of rocks look like Stephen Hawking.
__________

RJGatorEsq. on January 2, 2009 at 1:54 PM

“Maybe the fact that they are showing a little moral backbone right now isn’t such a bad thing.”

Nothing that Harry Reid does is “moral”.

Gambino errand boy Reid is only doing this to Blago because Blago’s dirty Chicago politics are the exact politics that got Baraka Obama elected and he doesn’t want any light shed on the goings on.

Reid, Pelosi and Obama are every bit as dirty as Blago, Blago just got caught.

NoDonkey on January 2, 2009 at 1:54 PM

If that creep shows up and the senators have any you-know-whats they should all throw shoes at him. At the very least they could all each slap the soles of a pair of shoes together.

MB4 on January 2, 2009 at 1:55 PM

Hmmm. I think CNN maybe in error — Art1, Sec 6 — “…They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.” So once Reid slams the gavel down, barring it can be proved that Burris was ineligible based on felony or treason, he has to be recognized FIRST. Then if Reid wants to proceed with explusion he can. But the rules don’t apply till he is seated.

Were I Blogo, I would wait for Reid to bar entrance. Then make an issue of proportional representation and taxation and Federal vs State authority. If he does that, I just might have to buy the ultra huge bag of popcorn the theaters use. Yum.

Dr. Dog on January 2, 2009 at 1:56 PM

Here’s hoping they can pull John Davidson out of retirement to play Blago for the movie of the week.

Casper the Friendly Host on January 2, 2009 at 1:58 PM

There’s a black man stealing my show!

The Race Card on January 2, 2009 at 1:45 PM

Were you going for the reverse of a certain Catholic Priest there? That’s what I pictured and I laughed.

BadgerHawk on January 2, 2009 at 1:59 PM

Of course, Blago will simply appoint another person – maybe Bobby Rush himself.

faraway on January 2, 2009 at 1:59 PM

Scheming about end runs around the Constitution again?

Trying to keep Burris out of that seat creates quite a dangerous precedent. Best to let him sit there quietly, being absolutely ignored.

But there’s no adrenalin in playing by the rules, I suppose.

angelat0763 on January 2, 2009 at 2:00 PM

I think I’m dreaming…50 Senate Demos did the right thing?
I just lost several minutes after i fell off my chair.
This just may be the Hope ‘n Change that Barry insisted he was bringing to DC, America, North America, the western world and to the entire world. As my bro said: ‘There’s something different in the air!’

Christine on January 2, 2009 at 2:00 PM

I’ve just realized how Obama is going to save the economy. The sale of Corn Poppers must be exploding by now!!

Pop Corn Tax!!!!

PappaMac on January 2, 2009 at 2:01 PM

If this were to happen then in a fair world the newspaper headline would read, “White Senate Democrat leader Harry Reid orders Physical Restraint of newly appointed Black Senator from entering Senate Chambers.”

Later headline, “Democrats in Illinois chose a White person to be next Senator from State of Illinois. White Senate Democrat leader Harry Reid welcomes new White Senator with open arms.”

albill on January 2, 2009 at 2:03 PM

They try to spot him here, they try to spot him there
Those Senators try to spot him everywhere
Is he up yonder? Or down in the dell?
Where is that blasted Burris now, do tell?

I believe he’s here upon your own shores
Prancing ’round your hallowed halls
After all, those race baiters are known
For splendid balls

PercyB on January 2, 2009 at 2:05 PM

Sure it’s funny as heck NOW, but you know liberals. Even though this is all the Democrats’ fault and they’re doing it to their own, they’re going to consider this a precident.

By every rule Illinois has, Burris is officially a Senator. Yes, this FUBAR has to be fixed; but it has to be fixed by the Democrats in Illinois, not by the Democrats in Washington.

Reid has tried before to turn the Capital Police into his own Praetorian Guard, and you can bet your ass that if he does this, he won’t hesitate a second to also pick and choosing which Republican Senators aren’t eligible to get in.

logis on January 2, 2009 at 2:12 PM

As amazing to me as his narcissism is, though, I’m almost as amazed at Burris’s shamelessness in enabling him. Surely he knows he’s being used by Blago to make his Democratic enemies choke on the racial politics of the appointment; surely he understands the grief this is causing Obama and the party.

Allah, maybe he knows exactly what kind of grief he’s causing. It appears to me to be the reaction of one who resists being tossed under a bus.

Blago must believe he did no wrong. We’re not privy to the conversations Blago had with The One and his staff. All we know — and they know — is that there are no tapes, so far anyway.

They left Blago to be the fall guy. He can see the handwriting on the wall: Nobody comes back from this. So what’s he got to lose?

EconomicNeocon on January 2, 2009 at 2:13 PM

Let’s get ready to RRRRUUUUMMMMBBBBLEEE

notashamed on January 2, 2009 at 2:14 PM

Jim62sch on January 2, 2009 at 1:21 PM
Blazing Saddles is such a timeless movie isn’t it.

tee866 on January 2, 2009 at 1:25 PM

Sorry about the up yours n!@@#R!

thomasaur on January 2, 2009 at 2:14 PM

Gotta love that party unity O’Boingo’s bringing. In fact, he’s uniting the whole nation, isn’t he? Why can’t he just work his magic and have everyone get along? Or could it be that he’s, well, how can I put this delicately, a charlatan, a fraud and a clown?

How’s he going to get Israel and Ham-ass to get along when he can’t even get his own party together?

mr.blacksheep on January 2, 2009 at 2:17 PM

just to put an extra line on that mausoleum wall

In the Navy and the Air Force, my father told me it’s called the “I love me” wall. Officers only need apply.

juanito on January 2, 2009 at 2:18 PM

BadgerHawk on January 2, 2009 at 1:59 PM

I want a Father Pfleger ringtone.

The Race Card on January 2, 2009 at 2:23 PM

Surely they can find eight Republicans to make it happen.

Odds are not very good.

Entelechy on January 2, 2009 at 2:26 PM

I want a Father Pfleger ringtone.

The Race Card on January 2, 2009 at 2:23 PM

Whenever Larry Elder (who’s ending his radio show) mentions Pfleger, he plays the just the part where Pfleger exclaims “I’m white!” and ends it there.

baldilocks on January 2, 2009 at 2:26 PM

Blago knows the Chicago machine is afraid of what he’ll bring to an impeachment party. Burris was a warning. Looks to me like the ball is now in the Illinois legislature’s court. Risk impeachment hearings and all that goes with it, or stand pat with Blago as Guv and live with the fallout from that. If they leave him in office, this thing will fester and bubble through Barry’s honeymoon period. Meanwhile, they are all afraid to talk on the telephone. How does a political machine operate without telephones?

a capella on January 2, 2009 at 2:30 PM

Am I the only person who finds this extrememly disturbing?

There is a big line between political or legal actions, and a physical confrontation.

Using physical force to suppress your political opponent is extremely disturbing.

Understand, I think Blago is digusting, and Burris seems to be an ego-maniac- but so what? The whole point of a Constitution and laws and so forth is to avoid physical confrontations. I don’t like this appointment, but I have a hard time seeing how it can be declared void. Sometimes you just have to accept things you don’t like. Also, will it really be that bad? In 2 years there will be an election and someone else will be Senator. If they really want to get rid of him earlier, then expell him! Don’t resort to physically barring him from the Senate floor.

The fact that the Democrats are resorting to physical force essentially to prevent themselves from being embarrased politically is… well, scary.

I think this is a very very bad precedent.

Not to mention it puts the sargent at arms in a very difficult position. Does he obey his boss in carrying out what is probably an unconstitutional order?

Everybody else seems to be enjoying this, and saying pass the popcorn. I think that even though I did not vote for the Democrats I still want the to make as few screwups as possible. This seems like a big screwup to me, and one that could have future negative effects, long after the Democrats who are making it are gone.

Sackett on January 2, 2009 at 2:33 PM

Surely they can find eight Republicans to make it happen.

If the Senate Republicans are smart (always a doubtful prospect) they’ll cite “federalism” and stay out of it. Then they’ll buy folding canvas chairs and some of those hats with beer can holders on them, and set up on the front lawn of the Capitol to watch when Burris shows up.

Jim62sch on January 2, 2009 at 2:36 PM

“In the Navy and the Air Force, my father told me it’s called the “I love me” wall. Officers only need apply.”

Ha!

I was operational, so I never got to have my “I love me” wall.

Some people used to put certificates they earned from one hour of sexual harrassment training”, it was pathetic.

NoDonkey on January 2, 2009 at 2:36 PM

Will Hollywood producers step to the plate and make a new movie? Mr. Burris Goes to Washinton

Rovin on January 2, 2009 at 1:28 PM

I love the idea, but it’s really “Mr. Blago goes to Washington”. Mr. Burris is just a minor character. The main figure is Blagojevich, and he is Einstein compared to Harry Reid’s dove brain, and who knows what all he knows. Doves, I apologize to you.

Penny for Obama’s thoughts…

Entelechy on January 2, 2009 at 2:37 PM

Everybody else seems to be enjoying this, and saying pass the popcorn. I think that even though I did not vote for the Democrats I still want them to make as few screwups as possible. This seems like a big screwup to me, and one that could have future negative effects, long after the Democrats who are making it are gone. Sackett on January 2, 2009 at 2:33 PM

The problem is when democrats “succeed” America fails.

Democratic = Fail

Mojave Mark on January 2, 2009 at 2:37 PM

baldilocks on January 2, 2009 at 2:26 PM

I had been listening to the Sage for 14+ years. His audio gags are hilarious! Sad to see him go. I have a Polaroid photo of me with Larry, on my desk. Don’t tell the homies.

The Race Card on January 2, 2009 at 2:43 PM

Isn’t the Senate sargeant at arms an old Illinois LEO/pol who served when Burris was IL AG?

a capella on January 2, 2009 at 1:45 PM

Knucklehead, from the HA headline thread, on topic, provided this

Coincidentally, the senate sergeant-at-arms,Terrance Gainer served in the Illinois government at the same time as Burris. Gainer was the director of the Illinois State Police from 1991-95. Burris was the Illinois attorney general from 1991-95.

OMG, it just doesn’t get much better than this. Terry Gainer is another schmuck who’s been up to eyeballs in the Chicago cesspool for years. I had no idea he weazeled his way into the Senate. I think he’s the one who mucked up the Chondra Levy murder case when he was working the DC police dept.

This is like old home week watching these buffoons playing their games lol

Knucklehead on January 1, 2009 at 11:37 PM

Entelechy on January 2, 2009 at 2:46 PM

I don’t see how any judge could find grounds to pass judgment on a decision by the senate.

snaggletoothie on January 2, 2009 at 1:46 PM

Precedents from the SCOTUS are contrary to this assumption.

Entelechy on January 2, 2009 at 2:48 PM

All 50 Senate Democrats signed a letter to Blago a few weeks ago warning him not to appoint anyone; presumably the nine new members soon to be seated feel the same way. Surely they can find eight Republicans to make it happen.

No Republican, not even a RINO, should sign onto this without the pre-condition that there be a special election.

Y-not on January 2, 2009 at 2:59 PM

Is Sen Bird going to dress the part?

tarpon on January 2, 2009 at 1:21 PM

Simply awesome.

ThePrez on January 2, 2009 at 3:01 PM

Let’s hope that Burris styles himself as Tiberius Gracchus…

darclon on January 2, 2009 at 3:04 PM

“. Surely he knows he’s being used by Blago to make his Democratic enemies choke on the racial politics of the appointment”

Why would he view that as a bad thing? Isn’t that whay racial politics is all about?

notagool on January 2, 2009 at 3:07 PM

I personally think that Burris should be seated. The Constitution says that the states should decide. Illinois had a choice, and they decided to punt and let the impeachment proceed the special election vote. If we held a special election, the Republicans might win, and we can’t have that.

Instead, Blago wins. He names a Senator, in accordance with the laws of Illinois and the United States. The Warren Court already ruled on a similar situation, and the Court found that the Senate and the House have no authority to block a member duly elected or appointed from attending. Harry Reid is planning on violating the constitution, and we think that’s good?

Blago hasn’t been indicted yet, much less convicted. I thought that this nation operated on the Innocent until Proven Guilty principal. Apparently, we only mouth those words, we don’t really mean them.

Blago is the elected Governor of Illinois, and is well within his rights to appoint a Senator. The only ones who could have stopped him was the Legislature, who decided the risk of a special election was too high. So they prayed that he wouldn’t do anything, while they fiddled with the rules of impeachment. Now, it’s too late, and they have their second Senator.

Congratulations Senator Burris, may you serve your state well.

Snake307 on January 2, 2009 at 3:11 PM

Obama goes to the Hill on Monday.

Also, it doesn’t look like the wimpering fools have reality on their side, but I’m repeating myself.

Entelechy on January 2, 2009 at 3:14 PM

Clowns to the left of me (Chicago),
Jokers to the right (New York),
Here I am, stuck in the middle with you.
kingsjester on January 2, 2009 at 1:28 PM

Right-on, right-on, right-on. But just so the wacky left coast shouldn’t be left out, I propose the following re-write.

Clowns to the left of me (SF, LA),
Jokers to the right (New York),
Here I am, stuck in the middle with you (Chicago).

Praise the Lord and pass the popcorn.

smellthecoffee on January 2, 2009 at 3:14 PM

Haven’t we heard this song before? Reid has said he won’t do something (previously opposing Bush on WOT, etc.), then caves when he has to- after flatly stating he will never do it.

Of course, it’s different with the Democratic issues. Still feels like deja vu.

cs89 on January 2, 2009 at 3:21 PM

The only ones who could have stopped him was the Legislature, who decided the risk of a special election was too high. So they prayed that he wouldn’t do anything, while they fiddled with the rules of impeachment. Now, it’s too late, and they have their second Senator.

Congratulations Senator Burris, may you serve your state well.

Snake307 on January 2, 2009 at 3:11 PM

Precisely – they already have a special election set to replace Emanuel in Congress. Alas, they’re scared, wimpering crooks – why give the people of Illinois the power to decide for themselves? In the end the people of IL deserve this, so long as they don’t revolt against it. I don’t see a poll which claims that they’re too upset.

Snake307 on January 2, 2009 at 3:11 PM

I loved your comment and agree with its sentiment. I don’t think anyone here is for anything unconstitutional. Most are just enjoying the fools’ circus. Of course, the ultimate victim is our beloved America. May she suffer really good for what is self-inflicted.

Entelechy on January 2, 2009 at 3:24 PM

The Dems are acting like children, for all the world to see and laugh about. It’s quite embarrassing, although not the least bit surprising. Maybe they’re playing limbo with their approval ratings.

scalleywag on January 2, 2009 at 3:35 PM

Even more amusing is the fact that according to Politico Quinn plans to appoint Dan Seals to the seat after they finally impeach Blago and throw him out of office. If you don’t know, Seals is an Obama look-alike who has run twice in the IL 10th district, which is full of “White People.” (i.e. liberal white professionals). He’s a horrible candidate and couldn’t win in two very pro-Democratic years in a district prone to support him and very sexually aroused by the Messiah. Even more delicious is mini-me Hope! and Change! will likely be opposed in the 2010 Senate race by the incumbent Congressman for the IL-10, Mark Kirk, who right now is laughing about his good fortune and printing business cards and stationary with his new title on it.

Illinidiva on January 2, 2009 at 3:35 PM

Blago hasn’t been indicted yet, much less convicted. I thought that this nation operated on the Innocent until Proven Guilty principal.

Well, “Innocent until Proven Guilty” is a principle of the criminal justice system. It doesn’t really necessarily apply anywhere else, particularly in matters of judgment about who is or is not under a cloud of suspicion sufficient to make their subsequent actions unseemly or inappropriate. It’s a matter of simple ethics: if you are accused of behavior that could bring your office into disrepute, out of respect of the office, it is considered proper to step aside until your name is cleared. So, for example, would you have wanted your daughter to date OJ in the late 90’s?

So to say that Blago’s in the clear to do what he likes until he’s convicted by a criminal court is a ridiculous canard. Now, that being said, don’t get me wrong: I’m enjoying every second of this, and I think this trap is sticky enough to get lots of cockroaches stuck in it, maybe even the Big Cockroach. We’ll see!

mr.blacksheep on January 2, 2009 at 3:36 PM

Haven’t we heard this song before? Reid has said he won’t do something (previously opposing Bush on WOT, etc.), then caves when he has to- after flatly stating he will never do it.

Of course, it’s different with the Democratic issues. Still feels like deja vu.

cs89 on January 2, 2009 at 3:21 PM

Harry “Pinky” Reid couldn’t find his balls if he had holes in both pockets.

thomasaur on January 2, 2009 at 4:08 PM

Consensus legal opinion is that Reid’s stuck with him, but see Slate for a contrarian view arguing that the Senate’s constitutionally entitled to examine the fairness of appointments.

Right. And the Senate wants to go there — judging whether a candidate is morally fit for office? That would be some can of worms they’d open, considering the escapades of some of the characters they already have seated in both Houses.

I like the idea near the end of passing a resolution now stating that Burris will be expelled by a two-thirds vote even if he wins in court.

On what grounds? Burris was legally appointed, due to the refusal of the state legislature to pass a law for a special election — which they were legally entitled to do. Expulsion was meant to be used for misconduct — Burris hasn’t doesn’t anything wrong. Is this now a banana republic?

All 50 Senate Democrats signed a letter to Blago a few weeks ago warning him not to appoint anyone; presumably the nine new members soon to be seated feel the same way. Surely they can find eight Republicans to make it happen.

They signed a letter in lieu of urging the state legislature to pass a law allowing for a special election. They didn’t, for fear they’d lose the seat, and Obama was silent on the issue, as usual. What legal standing does a letter have? Any Republican who “makes this happen” is a damn fool. Let them stew in the situation they created; if Burris takes it to court, the Dems will be minus a seat for quite a while, and the light will continue to shine on the corrupt political swamp that spawned Obama.

Nichevo on January 2, 2009 at 4:38 PM

Nichevo on January 2, 2009 at 4:38 PM

I think you’re right. Don’t ya just love Rod “Frag the Lieutenant” Blago? And this is just his opening salvo. My bet is that it’s going to get really, really nasty; nasty as only Demoncraps really know how.

mr.blacksheep on January 2, 2009 at 4:50 PM

Being from Southern Illinois this has been fascinating to watch.

My take is this: Either Blagois completely innocent, which I doubt so he honestly feels he is in the right.

Or: He knows he is guilty, of what exactly we don’t know, and is just going his own merry way until they indict him since he knows he is going down in flames.

One final choice: He is guilty, but knows something on bigger fish (OBAMA), andhispushing them until he is offered a deal.

Obama has lied before so I don’t take his investigation as anything but face value since he has constantly changed what he has said, from no contact, to some contact, to no inappropriate contact. I think his main goal is to keep the buffers between him and Blago and for that to happen somebody besides Blago is going to have to fall.

It is sad to see my state represented to the nation & world like this.

Kevin in Southern Illinois on January 2, 2009 at 5:01 PM

Don’t ya just love Rod “Frag the Lieutenant” Blago?
mr.blacksheep on January 2, 2009 at 4:50 PM

I can’t say I admire corruption, or playing the race card, but I have even less regard for hypocrisy.

Can anyone honestly believe that Emanuel — or anyone of hundreds of IL politicians — hasn’t played the same game as Blago? It’s a way of life there. Obama played the game, as well, only in a much more sophisticated form obviously admired and excused by the intelligentsia.
And the race card? Have we forgotten JJ,Jr. shilling on TV for Obama, calling Hillary a racist for not crying about Katrina? And how about “I don’t look like the Presidents on the dollar bills?” Real subtle.
Let the race chickens come home to roost.

Nichevo on January 2, 2009 at 5:30 PM

Lawrence Tribe argues that the Senate can refuse to seat Blago’s appointment.

Tribe makes the point that Powell v. McCormack does block Congress from refusing to seat properly elected members just because the majority doesn’t like their ideology.

The essence of the argument against seating anyone Blago has appointed is this:

“The question for the Senate isn’t whether the Illinois governor truly is a crook, but whether reasonable observers would deem the process too crooked to produce a credible result. “

LarryD on January 2, 2009 at 5:51 PM

This is embarrassing. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again, that whomever Blagojevich chooses, in this case, Burris, will get to keep the seat. Blagojevich knew full well when he announced Burris’ name that no one would stop him. This is the growing sentiment among Americans: nothing is inherently wrong, but only that which is caught and/or enforceable. The American people have abdicated to the government all of their God-given rights to hold government officials accountable, just as they have with so many other areas of life. Negligence, apathy, willful ignorance… they all played a role. It’s taken decades, but the Marxists have a multi-generational vision, whereas most Americans do not.

Send_Me on January 2, 2009 at 6:02 PM

“The question for the Senate isn’t whether the Illinois governor truly is a crook, but whether reasonable observers would deem the process too crooked to produce a credible result. “
LarryD on January 2, 2009 at 5:51 PM

One would assume then, they’d have to prove this particular appointment was “crooked,” when Burris takes it to court, which he will.

Nichevo on January 2, 2009 at 6:07 PM

Blagojevich knew full well when he announced Burris’ name that no one would stop him. This is the growing sentiment among Americans: nothing is inherently wrong, but only that which is caught and/or enforceable.
Send_Me on January 2, 2009 at 6:02 PM

I’m not buying that argument. Once again, Blago could have been prevented, by the IL legislature, from making an appointment, by the passage of a law requiring a special election. The IL legislature, fearing they might lose the seat to a Republican, didn’t act, but, in a hare-brained move, the State AG (a candidate for the Senate seat herself) went to court to prove Blago “incompetent.” The Court laughed, and she lost.

The voters of Illinois have had no say in the matter, thanks to the IL legislature.

Nichevo on January 2, 2009 at 6:15 PM

All 50 Senate Democrats signed a letter to Blago a few weeks ago warning him not to appoint anyone; presumably the nine new members soon to be seated feel the same way. Surely they can find eight Republicans to make it happen.

Assuming Franken wins and is seated by then, there will still only be 58 dems without … Obama’s seat. Dare we dream that Republicans will disciplined and brave enough to all vote present on this?

BuzzCrutcher on January 2, 2009 at 6:22 PM

The voters of Illinois have had no say in the matter, thanks to the IL legislature.
Nichevo on January 2, 2009 at 6:15 PM

“Have had no say”? The colonists had no say either I guess. At least Illinoisans have the ability to elect representatives, but they’ve wasted their votes on a bunch of politicians who decided to pass the buck to the courts rather than do their elected duty. The people didn’t act by electing individuals, but rather fell into the trap of the two-party system. “There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties… This, in my humble apprehension, is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution.” ~John Adams
When government fails, it’s the responsibility of the people to act. The people did not act responsibly when they voted and are not acting now that their irresponsible elected officials have failed. That is my point.

Send_Me on January 2, 2009 at 6:57 PM

I personally think that Burris should be seated. ………………………..

Instead, Blago wins. He names a Senator, in accordance with the laws of Illinois and the United States. The Warren Court already ruled on a similar situation, and the Court found that the Senate and the House have no authority to block a member duly elected or appointed from attending. Harry Reid is planning on violating the constitution, and we think that’s good?

Blago hasn’t been indicted yet, much less convicted. I thought that this nation operated on the Innocent until Proven Guilty principal. Apparently, we only mouth those words, we don’t really mean them.

Blago is the elected Governor of Illinois, and is well within his rights to appoint a Senator. The only ones who could have stopped him was the Legislature, who decided the risk of a special election was too high. So they prayed that he wouldn’t do anything, while they fiddled with the rules of impeachment. Now, it’s too late, and they have their second Senator.

Congratulations Senator Burris, may you serve your state well.

Snake307 on January 2, 2009 at 3:11 PM

Thank you, Snake. You’ve articulated it perfectly. Blago, guilty or innocent, is doing his job as Gov of Illinois. The DEMs in the Senate didn’t ‘do the right thing’; they did what their party leadership told them to do. The ‘right thing’ is to follow Constituional government, and live with Senator Burris for 2 years.

Red State State of Mind on January 2, 2009 at 7:33 PM

This will be political drama of the most compelling and low-rent kind.

Perhaps it is unfair to label this a Democrat issue. It is the players themselves who are so compelling, more than the flag they are flying.

Ares on January 2, 2009 at 8:01 PM

Bear in mind that the Slate article arguing in favor of the Senate’s right to not seat Burris is premised on the concept of an illegal selection process (whether election or appointment). The process that Blago employed for appointing Burris was NOT illegal. That Slate article is false logic – like so much of the rest of the self-delusional left. They confuse “wishing it so” with reality. This is the saddest batch of so-called leadership that I ever care to witness.

The 111th Congress will go down in history as the body that lost America.

ss396 on January 2, 2009 at 10:55 PM

This man must try to be seated! He has a constitutional duty to try to be seated! Also, please call the press before you try to be seated! Then let’s get Blago on the TV after they TWART him to talk about this… LOL!

sabbott on January 3, 2009 at 11:23 AM

Democrats may block Burris from seat — physically

Bahahahahaha, Harry Reid lying on the railroad tracks…that I’ve got see! I’d be the first time this dope did anything right.

byteshredder on January 4, 2009 at 3:38 PM

Comment pages: 1 2


You must be logged in to post a comment.