<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michigan city finds annoyance exception in First Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/michigan-city-finds-annoyance-exception-in-first-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/michigan-city-finds-annoyance-exception-in-first-amendment/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brighton Michigan&#8217;s decision to punish &#8220;annoying&#8221; behavior &#171; Blogging Censorship</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/michigan-city-finds-annoyance-exception-in-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1746833</link>
		<dc:creator>Brighton Michigan&#8217;s decision to punish &#8220;annoying&#8221; behavior &#171; Blogging Censorship</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38190#comment-1746833</guid>
		<description>[...] Snark award goes to hotair.com: Michigan finds itself in such financial distress that its Congressional contingent has successfully harangued the White House into multi-billion-dollar loans to private enterprise.  I find that extremely annoying. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Snark award goes to hotair.com: Michigan finds itself in such financial distress that its Congressional contingent has successfully harangued the White House into multi-billion-dollar loans to private enterprise.  I find that extremely annoying. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brighton, Michigan Bans Speech That Annoys : Stop The ACLU</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/michigan-city-finds-annoyance-exception-in-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1736954</link>
		<dc:creator>Brighton, Michigan Bans Speech That Annoys : Stop The ACLU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38190#comment-1736954</guid>
		<description>[...] has a conception of free speech that fits nicely with its prevailing conception of capitalism. As Ed Morrissey comments: Michigan finds itself in such financial distress that its Congressional contingent has [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has a conception of free speech that fits nicely with its prevailing conception of capitalism. As Ed Morrissey comments: Michigan finds itself in such financial distress that its Congressional contingent has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Profiles in Stupid: Brighton Michigan &#171; The IUSB Vision Weblog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/michigan-city-finds-annoyance-exception-in-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1736931</link>
		<dc:creator>Profiles in Stupid: Brighton Michigan &#171; The IUSB Vision Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38190#comment-1736931</guid>
		<description>[...] before the Michigan ACLU sends them a nasty-gram to get the process rolling. Hotair.com comments HERE. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Michigan City Decides Free Speech Okay If It [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] before the Michigan ACLU sends them a nasty-gram to get the process rolling. Hotair.com comments HERE. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Michigan City Decides Free Speech Okay If It [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akzed</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/michigan-city-finds-annoyance-exception-in-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1736761</link>
		<dc:creator>Akzed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38190#comment-1736761</guid>
		<description>No problemo. There is nothing about cities, school boards, counties etc in the 1st Amendment. Check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problemo. There is nothing about cities, school boards, counties etc in the 1st Amendment. Check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moonbattery</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/michigan-city-finds-annoyance-exception-in-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1736667</link>
		<dc:creator>Moonbattery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38190#comment-1736667</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Brighton, Michigan Bans Speech That Annoys...&lt;/strong&gt;

Suburban Detroit has discovered a missing clause in the First Amendment. We have a right to free speech &#8212; so long as no one is annoyed by it. The Brighton City Council on Thursday approved an ordinance allowing police in......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Brighton, Michigan Bans Speech That Annoys&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Suburban Detroit has discovered a missing clause in the First Amendment. We have a right to free speech &#8212; so long as no one is annoyed by it. The Brighton City Council on Thursday approved an ordinance allowing police in&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Rock</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/michigan-city-finds-annoyance-exception-in-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1736582</link>
		<dc:creator>The Rock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38190#comment-1736582</guid>
		<description>Hate speech is saying anything the left hates.
There is nothing the left hates as much as a logical argument they cannot refute.

Telling the truth, on the witness stand, has got to annoy somebody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hate speech is saying anything the left hates.<br />
There is nothing the left hates as much as a logical argument they cannot refute.</p>
<p>Telling the truth, on the witness stand, has got to annoy somebody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Rock</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/michigan-city-finds-annoyance-exception-in-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1736580</link>
		<dc:creator>The Rock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38190#comment-1736580</guid>
		<description>Me thinks that I would go out and annoy as many people as possible as often as possible.

Stupid deserves to be highlighted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me thinks that I would go out and annoy as many people as possible as often as possible.</p>
<p>Stupid deserves to be highlighted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squiggy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/michigan-city-finds-annoyance-exception-in-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1736487</link>
		<dc:creator>Squiggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38190#comment-1736487</guid>
		<description>Sorry, rokemronnie.  Screw the unions.  If the &quot;big three&quot; cant deal with it, buhbye.  Making my children bail them out isn&#039;t right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, rokemronnie.  Screw the unions.  If the &#8220;big three&#8221; cant deal with it, buhbye.  Making my children bail them out isn&#8217;t right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rokemronnie</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/michigan-city-finds-annoyance-exception-in-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1736289</link>
		<dc:creator>rokemronnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 01:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38190#comment-1736289</guid>
		<description>Ed, Go ahead, join the general pile-on. Michigan, after all, is the source of all evil in the United States, isn&#039;t it? I&#039;m quite sure we can find stupid laws and stupid politicians in Minnesota. Speaking of which, Debbie Stabenow may have reached her level of competency in the House and Carl Levin is an ideological left winger, but Michigan hasn&#039;t come anywhere close to electing to the Senate as odious a character as Al Franken.

We have conservatives who claim to be free-marketers who oppose wage and price controls, except when the federal government is telling UAW members that they make too much money.

We have other conservatives who don&#039;t have a clue what a &quot;supply chain&quot; is and think that we won&#039;t have a problem producing jets and tanks even if GM and their suppliers collapse.

We have Southern Republicans wanting to wage the Civil War all over again now that they have industries. Of course they have to ignore the fact that all of &quot;their&quot; industries are imported from other parts of the country or overseas because Southern agrarian culture has never been industrious - look at how their textile and furniture industries imploded in the face of foreign competition. Meanwhile big Dick, Shelby lies about the &quot;new American auto industry&quot; doing just fine as Toyota and Honda slip into the red and all the assembly facilities in his state are cutting production by 40% and Mercedes is buying out employees.

But, hey, if it makes you all warm and fuzzy to say bad stuff about Detroit and Michigan, whatever floats your boat.

Most Americans, including Ed, MM and AP don&#039;t have a clue about manufacturing. They&#039;re just the right of center version of all those paper pushers who brought on the financial crisis. They work with paper and words, not with tangible items. 

I say this as a ideological conservative, so don&#039;t even bother with the knee-jerk responses. The loans to GM were not an ideal solution. There was no ideal solution. This is just a crap sandwich that we have to eat to avoid even greater indigestion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed, Go ahead, join the general pile-on. Michigan, after all, is the source of all evil in the United States, isn&#8217;t it? I&#8217;m quite sure we can find stupid laws and stupid politicians in Minnesota. Speaking of which, Debbie Stabenow may have reached her level of competency in the House and Carl Levin is an ideological left winger, but Michigan hasn&#8217;t come anywhere close to electing to the Senate as odious a character as Al Franken.</p>
<p>We have conservatives who claim to be free-marketers who oppose wage and price controls, except when the federal government is telling UAW members that they make too much money.</p>
<p>We have other conservatives who don&#8217;t have a clue what a &#8220;supply chain&#8221; is and think that we won&#8217;t have a problem producing jets and tanks even if GM and their suppliers collapse.</p>
<p>We have Southern Republicans wanting to wage the Civil War all over again now that they have industries. Of course they have to ignore the fact that all of &#8220;their&#8221; industries are imported from other parts of the country or overseas because Southern agrarian culture has never been industrious &#8211; look at how their textile and furniture industries imploded in the face of foreign competition. Meanwhile big Dick, Shelby lies about the &#8220;new American auto industry&#8221; doing just fine as Toyota and Honda slip into the red and all the assembly facilities in his state are cutting production by 40% and Mercedes is buying out employees.</p>
<p>But, hey, if it makes you all warm and fuzzy to say bad stuff about Detroit and Michigan, whatever floats your boat.</p>
<p>Most Americans, including Ed, MM and AP don&#8217;t have a clue about manufacturing. They&#8217;re just the right of center version of all those paper pushers who brought on the financial crisis. They work with paper and words, not with tangible items. </p>
<p>I say this as a ideological conservative, so don&#8217;t even bother with the knee-jerk responses. The loans to GM were not an ideal solution. There was no ideal solution. This is just a crap sandwich that we have to eat to avoid even greater indigestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LegendHasIt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/michigan-city-finds-annoyance-exception-in-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1736103</link>
		<dc:creator>LegendHasIt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 22:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38190#comment-1736103</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;How about someone going into a Chuckee Cheese, grabbing his crotch and yelling “F*** YOU!!!”
Legal?
Squiggy on December 21, 2008 at 2:26 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There are probably &lt;strong&gt;at least&lt;/strong&gt; two laws against that already:
something along the lines of 
&quot;Creating a Public Disturbance&quot;
&quot;Public Indecency&quot;
Although they may be worded differently in various places, nearly every jurisdiction has something similar.

The only REAL reasons for this new law can be to crush public dissent and increase the local government&#039;s coffers.

To you people that think this might be a good idea, I have just two (over used) words:

Slippery Slope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>How about someone going into a Chuckee Cheese, grabbing his crotch and yelling “F*** YOU!!!”<br />
Legal?<br />
Squiggy on December 21, 2008 at 2:26 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>There are probably <strong>at least</strong> two laws against that already:<br />
something along the lines of<br />
&#8220;Creating a Public Disturbance&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Public Indecency&#8221;<br />
Although they may be worded differently in various places, nearly every jurisdiction has something similar.</p>
<p>The only REAL reasons for this new law can be to crush public dissent and increase the local government&#8217;s coffers.</p>
<p>To you people that think this might be a good idea, I have just two (over used) words:</p>
<p>Slippery Slope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: City bans annoying speech &#171; Internet Scofflaw</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/michigan-city-finds-annoyance-exception-in-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1736088</link>
		<dc:creator>City bans annoying speech &#171; Internet Scofflaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38190#comment-1736088</guid>
		<description>[...] bans annoying&#160;speech  In Brighton, Michigan, a ban on annoying speech is set to take effect January [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bans annoying&nbsp;speech  In Brighton, Michigan, a ban on annoying speech is set to take effect January [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squiggy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/michigan-city-finds-annoyance-exception-in-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1735982</link>
		<dc:creator>Squiggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 19:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38190#comment-1735982</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m ambivalent too.  

How about someone going into a Chuckee Cheese, grabbing his crotch and yelling &quot;F*** YOU!!!&quot;

Legal?

The Constitution applies to political speech.  This ain&#039;t political speech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m ambivalent too.  </p>
<p>How about someone going into a Chuckee Cheese, grabbing his crotch and yelling &#8220;F*** YOU!!!&#8221;</p>
<p>Legal?</p>
<p>The Constitution applies to political speech.  This ain&#8217;t political speech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillH</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/michigan-city-finds-annoyance-exception-in-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1735925</link>
		<dc:creator>BillH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38190#comment-1735925</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You think you’re annoyed?…..I live in Michigan.

infidelgranny on December 20, 2008 at 9:38 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You have it good, Infidelgranny. At least &lt;em&gt;your&lt;/em&gt; state Supreme Court didn&#039;t find that you can be liable for injuries to another party if you render emergency assistance. I&#039;m &lt;strong&gt;REALLY&lt;/strong&gt; annoyed, and I can&#039;t issue a ticket. But I can recall them, through a process that&#039;s, well, annoying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You think you’re annoyed?…..I live in Michigan.</p>
<p>infidelgranny on December 20, 2008 at 9:38 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>You have it good, Infidelgranny. At least <em>your</em> state Supreme Court didn&#8217;t find that you can be liable for injuries to another party if you render emergency assistance. I&#8217;m <strong>REALLY</strong> annoyed, and I can&#8217;t issue a ticket. But I can recall them, through a process that&#8217;s, well, annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonosam</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/michigan-city-finds-annoyance-exception-in-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1735877</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonosam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 17:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38190#comment-1735877</guid>
		<description>sharia law here we come

when are we going to rescue the survivors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sharia law here we come</p>
<p>when are we going to rescue the survivors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mojave Mark</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/michigan-city-finds-annoyance-exception-in-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1735763</link>
		<dc:creator>Mojave Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38190#comment-1735763</guid>
		<description>Libs just can&#039;t take criticism. It&#039;s like telling an alcoholic that he&#039;s, well, an alcoholic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Libs just can&#8217;t take criticism. It&#8217;s like telling an alcoholic that he&#8217;s, well, an alcoholic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DannoJyd</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/michigan-city-finds-annoyance-exception-in-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1735721</link>
		<dc:creator>DannoJyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38190#comment-1735721</guid>
		<description>No wonder that B. Hussein Obama cancelled his speach [speech?] there. 

I guess the Brighton City Council will have to STFU as well. Silver linings. :oP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No wonder that B. Hussein Obama cancelled his speach [speech?] there. </p>
<p>I guess the Brighton City Council will have to STFU as well. Silver linings. :oP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michigan City and the First Amendment &#124; Generic Rant - NOT always Politcally Correct!</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/michigan-city-finds-annoyance-exception-in-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1735685</link>
		<dc:creator>Michigan City and the First Amendment &#124; Generic Rant - NOT always Politcally Correct!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 13:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38190#comment-1735685</guid>
		<description>[...] quote another blogger: Freedom of speech means tolerating that speech we find annoying. In fact, freedom of speech means [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] quote another blogger: Freedom of speech means tolerating that speech we find annoying. In fact, freedom of speech means [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karmashock</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/michigan-city-finds-annoyance-exception-in-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1735550</link>
		<dc:creator>Karmashock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 05:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38190#comment-1735550</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a little ambivalent on this one... if only because some people really do out of their way to not just speak but irritate people or harass them into doing what they want.


For example, take the protests in Berkley against the marine recruiting station. Or almost anything code pink has ever done. It&#039;s obnoxious and it doesn&#039;t need to be. They have a right to speak but not disrupt business.


So... that&#039;s more or less where I stand on that one. if it gets code pink to respect people&#039;s right to ignore them, then it&#039;s good. If it&#039;s used to stop ACTUALLY peaceful protests then it&#039;s bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little ambivalent on this one&#8230; if only because some people really do out of their way to not just speak but irritate people or harass them into doing what they want.</p>
<p>For example, take the protests in Berkley against the marine recruiting station. Or almost anything code pink has ever done. It&#8217;s obnoxious and it doesn&#8217;t need to be. They have a right to speak but not disrupt business.</p>
<p>So&#8230; that&#8217;s more or less where I stand on that one. if it gets code pink to respect people&#8217;s right to ignore them, then it&#8217;s good. If it&#8217;s used to stop ACTUALLY peaceful protests then it&#8217;s bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sins of Omission</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/michigan-city-finds-annoyance-exception-in-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1735429</link>
		<dc:creator>Sins of Omission</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38190#comment-1735429</guid>
		<description>[...] A dubious exception to the first Amendment. (Hat Tip: Hot Air.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A dubious exception to the first Amendment. (Hat Tip: Hot Air.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fossten</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/michigan-city-finds-annoyance-exception-in-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1735398</link>
		<dc:creator>fossten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38190#comment-1735398</guid>
		<description>Is dissent considered annoying to government officials?

/Stalin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is dissent considered annoying to government officials?</p>
<p>/Stalin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: infidelgranny</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/michigan-city-finds-annoyance-exception-in-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1735316</link>
		<dc:creator>infidelgranny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 02:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38190#comment-1735316</guid>
		<description>Michigan finds itself in such financial distress that its &lt;blockquote&gt;Congressional contingent has successfully harangued the White House into multi-billion-dollar loans to private enterprise.  I find that extremely annoying.  Do we get to issue citations to the entire state of Michigan now?  Considering the economic mess the state government has created in that state, what they need is more annoying speech, not less, especially if it annoys the current power structure.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
You think you&#039;re annoyed?.....I live in Michigan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michigan finds itself in such financial distress that its<br />
<blockquote>Congressional contingent has successfully harangued the White House into multi-billion-dollar loans to private enterprise.  I find that extremely annoying.  Do we get to issue citations to the entire state of Michigan now?  Considering the economic mess the state government has created in that state, what they need is more annoying speech, not less, especially if it annoys the current power structure.</p></blockquote>
<p>You think you&#8217;re annoyed?&#8230;..I live in Michigan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Public Secrets</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/michigan-city-finds-annoyance-exception-in-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1735257</link>
		<dc:creator>Public Secrets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 01:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38190#comment-1735257</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Some people just don&#039;t get it...&lt;/strong&gt;

Brighton, Michigan, has authorized it&#039;s police to ticket and prosecute anyone found annoying others by exercising their right to speak freely. Free speech? Whaddat? Technorati tags: 1st Amendment, free speech, Brighton, Michigan......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Some people just don&#8217;t get it&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Brighton, Michigan, has authorized it&#8217;s police to ticket and prosecute anyone found annoying others by exercising their right to speak freely. Free speech? Whaddat? Technorati tags: 1st Amendment, free speech, Brighton, Michigan&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michigan city finds annoyance exception in First Amendment &#171; DC: Freedom &#38; Linux</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/michigan-city-finds-annoyance-exception-in-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1735253</link>
		<dc:creator>Michigan city finds annoyance exception in First Amendment &#171; DC: Freedom &#38; Linux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 01:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38190#comment-1735253</guid>
		<description>[...] Source: hotair.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: hotair.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sethstorm</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/michigan-city-finds-annoyance-exception-in-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1735055</link>
		<dc:creator>sethstorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 00:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38190#comment-1735055</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
flytier on December 20, 2008 at 5:16 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Northern Michigan as in the Upper Peninsula?

There are places you would be the only one around for miles.  

&lt;blockquote&gt;
redshirt on December 20, 2008 at 6:42 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Judge recuses himself and faces his own trial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
flytier on December 20, 2008 at 5:16 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Northern Michigan as in the Upper Peninsula?</p>
<p>There are places you would be the only one around for miles.  </p>
<blockquote><p>
redshirt on December 20, 2008 at 6:42 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Judge recuses himself and faces his own trial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sethstorm</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/michigan-city-finds-annoyance-exception-in-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1735050</link>
		<dc:creator>sethstorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 00:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38190#comment-1735050</guid>
		<description>In other news, accounts from Michigan-based posters to HA fall silent on all political fronts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In other news, accounts from Michigan-based posters to HA fall silent on all political fronts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
