<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California court holds rescuers liable for injuries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/california-court-holds-rescuers-liable-for-injuries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/california-court-holds-rescuers-liable-for-injuries/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 16:57:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: California court holds rescuers liable for injuries &#171; Top Daily Digest Reading</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/california-court-holds-rescuers-liable-for-injuries/comment-page-4/#comment-1752704</link>
		<dc:creator>California court holds rescuers liable for injuries &#171; Top Daily Digest Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 21:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38170#comment-1752704</guid>
		<description>[...] Read about it here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read about it here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/california-court-holds-rescuers-liable-for-injuries/comment-page-4/#comment-1741428</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38170#comment-1741428</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Pay attention to willfully and wantonly. If this accident had been in TX, the plaintiff would not have a leg to stand on.

john1schn on December 23, 2008 at 1:24 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Unless, a Texas court finds that yanking someone who has a severe spinal injury by the arm and dumping them immediately near the truck when there was no reasonable belief it was necessary and EMS arrived moments afterward, i.e., the siren was audible, was willfully and wantonly negligent. Then the defendant has no legs to stand on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Pay attention to willfully and wantonly. If this accident had been in TX, the plaintiff would not have a leg to stand on.</p>
<p>john1schn on December 23, 2008 at 1:24 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Unless, a Texas court finds that yanking someone who has a severe spinal injury by the arm and dumping them immediately near the truck when there was no reasonable belief it was necessary and EMS arrived moments afterward, i.e., the siren was audible, was willfully and wantonly negligent. Then the defendant has no legs to stand on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/california-court-holds-rescuers-liable-for-injuries/comment-page-4/#comment-1741403</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38170#comment-1741403</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Without knowing the particulars of this case, I can only say that if the rescuer really believed she was doing a good thing &amp; tried her best, no matter what the outcome, it sets a dangerous precedent to persecute/prosecute her for it. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

So, it’s her belief that counts no matter how unreasonable the belief and no matter how negligent her actions and no matter how tragic the results?  Talk about setting dangerous precedents. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;If the rescuer was drunk &amp;/or stoned, then that is a separate issue. Even drunk &amp;/or stoned people do good deeds on occasion.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No, it is not a separate issue. It is part of this case.   The woman was smoking dope and then went out for drinks. No one saw any smoke or any liquid coming from the car. She dumped her right next to the car. The ems arrived moments later. Did she have a reasonable belief or was she fk up out of her gourd?

&lt;blockquote&gt;Bottom line-people can be inherently brave &amp; good-why would we want to mess with this?

Badger40 on December 22, 2008 at 11:47 AM &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh, I dunno. Because some people don&#039;t want to be paralyzed for life by some stoner?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Without knowing the particulars of this case, I can only say that if the rescuer really believed she was doing a good thing &amp; tried her best, no matter what the outcome, it sets a dangerous precedent to persecute/prosecute her for it. </p></blockquote>
<p>So, it’s her belief that counts no matter how unreasonable the belief and no matter how negligent her actions and no matter how tragic the results?  Talk about setting dangerous precedents. </p>
<blockquote><p>If the rescuer was drunk &amp;/or stoned, then that is a separate issue. Even drunk &amp;/or stoned people do good deeds on occasion.</p></blockquote>
<p>No, it is not a separate issue. It is part of this case.   The woman was smoking dope and then went out for drinks. No one saw any smoke or any liquid coming from the car. She dumped her right next to the car. The ems arrived moments later. Did she have a reasonable belief or was she fk up out of her gourd?</p>
<blockquote><p>Bottom line-people can be inherently brave &amp; good-why would we want to mess with this?</p>
<p>Badger40 on December 22, 2008 at 11:47 AM </p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, I dunno. Because some people don&#8217;t want to be paralyzed for life by some stoner?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/california-court-holds-rescuers-liable-for-injuries/comment-page-4/#comment-1741393</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38170#comment-1741393</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;This Blake thing is way out of hand.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I agree!

&lt;blockquote&gt;Why is anyone bothering to reply to this individual after the vitriol he/she started to spew?

Badger40 on December 22, 2008 at 11:47 AM &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Because they hate facts and the people who cite them. They also enjoy spewing vitriol themselves, especially when it&#039;s twenty against one. lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This Blake thing is way out of hand.
</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree!</p>
<blockquote><p>Why is anyone bothering to reply to this individual after the vitriol he/she started to spew?</p>
<p>Badger40 on December 22, 2008 at 11:47 AM </p></blockquote>
<p>Because they hate facts and the people who cite them. They also enjoy spewing vitriol themselves, especially when it&#8217;s twenty against one. lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/california-court-holds-rescuers-liable-for-injuries/comment-page-4/#comment-1741390</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38170#comment-1741390</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Liberal creeps like Blake makes us Conservatives understand why we hate the far left sue happy jerks of the ACLU and other lawers that pray on fears of self-reliant people, people that want the ability to help and assist our neighbors in need.

Mark Garnett on December 22, 2008 at 11:54 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I’m not a liberal creep but a smart conservative and have never sued anyone in my life. If you are a conservative, you are a dumb one.  Switch parties, please. 

And for the record: Lawyers don&#039;t sue people on their own behalf. People hire them to sue others. No client, no lawsuit. Your beef appears to be with the paraplegic people of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Liberal creeps like Blake makes us Conservatives understand why we hate the far left sue happy jerks of the ACLU and other lawers that pray on fears of self-reliant people, people that want the ability to help and assist our neighbors in need.</p>
<p>Mark Garnett on December 22, 2008 at 11:54 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>I’m not a liberal creep but a smart conservative and have never sued anyone in my life. If you are a conservative, you are a dumb one.  Switch parties, please. </p>
<p>And for the record: Lawyers don&#8217;t sue people on their own behalf. People hire them to sue others. No client, no lawsuit. Your beef appears to be with the paraplegic people of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/california-court-holds-rescuers-liable-for-injuries/comment-page-4/#comment-1741388</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38170#comment-1741388</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Mr. Blake, many of us would be more likely to listen to you if you weren’t so nasty in the way you address others.

DrMagnolias on December 22, 2008 at 2:21 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I address people the way they address or have addressed me. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;The typical “all-or-nothing” argument you spew is a lot like your lower intestine, Blake…stinky. 

selias on December 22, 2008 at 12:02 PM &lt;/blockquote&gt;

You seem to know a lot about lower intestines. Maybe, you should pull your head out of yours and other people’s  ass?  Just sayin’  

&lt;blockquote&gt;I can think of more than 2 dozen reasons to extract a victim out of a smashed vehicle before a trained professional arrives…a potential explosion or fire not included.

selias on December 22, 2008 at 12:02 PM &lt;/blockquote&gt;

And, none of them applied here.  And one does not go into shock from being trapped in a car and the smoke from the airbag is harmless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Mr. Blake, many of us would be more likely to listen to you if you weren’t so nasty in the way you address others.</p>
<p>DrMagnolias on December 22, 2008 at 2:21 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I address people the way they address or have addressed me. </p>
<blockquote><p>The typical “all-or-nothing” argument you spew is a lot like your lower intestine, Blake…stinky. </p>
<p>selias on December 22, 2008 at 12:02 PM </p></blockquote>
<p>You seem to know a lot about lower intestines. Maybe, you should pull your head out of yours and other people’s  ass?  Just sayin’  </p>
<blockquote><p>I can think of more than 2 dozen reasons to extract a victim out of a smashed vehicle before a trained professional arrives…a potential explosion or fire not included.</p>
<p>selias on December 22, 2008 at 12:02 PM </p></blockquote>
<p>And, none of them applied here.  And one does not go into shock from being trapped in a car and the smoke from the airbag is harmless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Profiles in Stupid: California Court Shuts Down &#8220;Good Samaritan Law&#8221; &#171; The IUSB Vision Weblog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/california-court-holds-rescuers-liable-for-injuries/comment-page-4/#comment-1740780</link>
		<dc:creator>Profiles in Stupid: California Court Shuts Down &#8220;Good Samaritan Law&#8221; &#171; The IUSB Vision Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 02:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38170#comment-1740780</guid>
		<description>[...] Hotair.com comments: The court has sent a signal to the people of California: don’t get involved. If someone’s drowning, don’t jump in the lake and save them. If someone’s trapped in a car that’s about to explode, sit there and watch the show. Just make a phone call, and who cares that it might be several minutes before an EMS team can make it to the scene? If you sit on your hands, no one can sue you for all you’re worth. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hotair.com comments: The court has sent a signal to the people of California: don’t get involved. If someone’s drowning, don’t jump in the lake and save them. If someone’s trapped in a car that’s about to explode, sit there and watch the show. Just make a phone call, and who cares that it might be several minutes before an EMS team can make it to the scene? If you sit on your hands, no one can sue you for all you’re worth. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john1schn</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/california-court-holds-rescuers-liable-for-injuries/comment-page-4/#comment-1738659</link>
		<dc:creator>john1schn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 06:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38170#comment-1738659</guid>
		<description>Texas Good Samaritan Law:

&lt;blockquote&gt;The Texas Good Samaritan Law limits the civil liability of persons administering emergency care in good faith at the scene of an emergency or in a health care facility.  The law limits the civil liability of these persons unless their actions are willfully and wantonly negligent. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Pay attention to willfully and wantonly.  If this accident had been in TX, the plaintiff would not have a leg to stand on.

/no, not literally...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas Good Samaritan Law:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Texas Good Samaritan Law limits the civil liability of persons administering emergency care in good faith at the scene of an emergency or in a health care facility.  The law limits the civil liability of these persons unless their actions are willfully and wantonly negligent. </p></blockquote>
<p>Pay attention to willfully and wantonly.  If this accident had been in TX, the plaintiff would not have a leg to stand on.</p>
<p>/no, not literally&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gary fouse</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/california-court-holds-rescuers-liable-for-injuries/comment-page-4/#comment-1738613</link>
		<dc:creator>gary fouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 05:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38170#comment-1738613</guid>
		<description>As a Californian (and retired law-enforcement officer) who would always respond to such a situation, I am disappointed but not surprised at the court&#039;s decision. On the other hand, it fits right in with the mentality of a growing number of our state&#039;s residents.

gary fouse
fousesquawk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Californian (and retired law-enforcement officer) who would always respond to such a situation, I am disappointed but not surprised at the court&#8217;s decision. On the other hand, it fits right in with the mentality of a growing number of our state&#8217;s residents.</p>
<p>gary fouse<br />
fousesquawk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john1schn</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/california-court-holds-rescuers-liable-for-injuries/comment-page-4/#comment-1738607</link>
		<dc:creator>john1schn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 05:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38170#comment-1738607</guid>
		<description>Thank goodness I live in TX.  We’re neighborly here.  I was stuck on our rural loop (1604-AKA the “Death Loop&quot;) one night and saw an overturned truck, and the victim lying about 30-40 feet away.  He wasn’t moving.  He had been thrown through the windshield and onto the pavement.  I did what I could until the cops and EMS arrived. 

If this was CA, I would wave at the twitching body and drive on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank goodness I live in TX.  We’re neighborly here.  I was stuck on our rural loop (1604-AKA the “Death Loop&#8221;) one night and saw an overturned truck, and the victim lying about 30-40 feet away.  He wasn’t moving.  He had been thrown through the windshield and onto the pavement.  I did what I could until the cops and EMS arrived. </p>
<p>If this was CA, I would wave at the twitching body and drive on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PicoBusiness &#187; The Inevitable</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/california-court-holds-rescuers-liable-for-injuries/comment-page-4/#comment-1738250</link>
		<dc:creator>PicoBusiness &#187; The Inevitable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 01:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38170#comment-1738250</guid>
		<description>[...] We take another step on our inevitable path towards national self-destruction. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We take another step on our inevitable path towards national self-destruction. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnyU</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/california-court-holds-rescuers-liable-for-injuries/comment-page-4/#comment-1737919</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnyU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38170#comment-1737919</guid>
		<description>I guess if I am in California, as I often am, and I see someone needing a tire change on the side of the road, I&#039;ll keep driving. Surely they&#039;d get in their car, maybe have a wreck and blame me for getting them back on the road in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess if I am in California, as I often am, and I see someone needing a tire change on the side of the road, I&#8217;ll keep driving. Surely they&#8217;d get in their car, maybe have a wreck and blame me for getting them back on the road in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnyU</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/california-court-holds-rescuers-liable-for-injuries/comment-page-3/#comment-1737914</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnyU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38170#comment-1737914</guid>
		<description>GoodWill is in the courts. There you have it. Thats what this country has become.  Thanks lawyers, now you can buy a new Lexus fighting those cases too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GoodWill is in the courts. There you have it. Thats what this country has become.  Thanks lawyers, now you can buy a new Lexus fighting those cases too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrX</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/california-court-holds-rescuers-liable-for-injuries/comment-page-3/#comment-1737795</link>
		<dc:creator>MrX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38170#comment-1737795</guid>
		<description>Loser pays is ridiculous.  Courts generally take the side of big corporations and banks.  Or whatever has more money than you because judges know that people with less money will get wiped out.  And with Res Judicata (the most corrupt law ever invented where the rich wins vs. the truth), their judgment is virtually certain to stand.  I never go to court anymore.  It&#039;s a waste of money.  Just for showing up, they will award punitive damages against me.  If you have to, do what you can, but loser pays is the same as saying regular Joe and Jane pays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loser pays is ridiculous.  Courts generally take the side of big corporations and banks.  Or whatever has more money than you because judges know that people with less money will get wiped out.  And with Res Judicata (the most corrupt law ever invented where the rich wins vs. the truth), their judgment is virtually certain to stand.  I never go to court anymore.  It&#8217;s a waste of money.  Just for showing up, they will award punitive damages against me.  If you have to, do what you can, but loser pays is the same as saying regular Joe and Jane pays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bryan2369</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/california-court-holds-rescuers-liable-for-injuries/comment-page-3/#comment-1737400</link>
		<dc:creator>bryan2369</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38170#comment-1737400</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The court has sent a signal to the people of California: don’t get involved.  If someone’s drowning, don’t jump in the lake and save them.  If someone’s trapped in a car that’s about to explode, sit there and watch the show.  Just make a phone call, and who cares that it might be several minutes before an EMS team can make it to the scene?  If you sit on your hands, no one can sue you for all you’re worth.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Nothing to see here, people! Move along! Ignore the man in the car on fire! Keep traffic moving!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The court has sent a signal to the people of California: don’t get involved.  If someone’s drowning, don’t jump in the lake and save them.  If someone’s trapped in a car that’s about to explode, sit there and watch the show.  Just make a phone call, and who cares that it might be several minutes before an EMS team can make it to the scene?  If you sit on your hands, no one can sue you for all you’re worth.</p></blockquote>
<p>Nothing to see here, people! Move along! Ignore the man in the car on fire! Keep traffic moving!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esthier</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/california-court-holds-rescuers-liable-for-injuries/comment-page-3/#comment-1737388</link>
		<dc:creator>Esthier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38170#comment-1737388</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Liberal creeps like Blake makes us Conservatives understand why we hate the far left sue happy jerks of the ACLU and other lawers that pray on fears of self-reliant people, people that want the ability to help and assist our neighbors in need.

Mark Garnett on December 22, 2008 at 11:54 AM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Blake isn&#039;t a liberal. I&#039;m not saying this to defend him but just as a matter of fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Liberal creeps like Blake makes us Conservatives understand why we hate the far left sue happy jerks of the ACLU and other lawers that pray on fears of self-reliant people, people that want the ability to help and assist our neighbors in need.</p>
<p>Mark Garnett on December 22, 2008 at 11:54 AM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Blake isn&#8217;t a liberal. I&#8217;m not saying this to defend him but just as a matter of fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrMagnolias</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/california-court-holds-rescuers-liable-for-injuries/comment-page-3/#comment-1737277</link>
		<dc:creator>DrMagnolias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38170#comment-1737277</guid>
		<description>Mr. Blake, many of us would be more likely to listen to you if you weren&#039;t so nasty in the way you address others. As far as I can tell, in your first comment on this topic you resorted to name-calling. I am always willing to listen to a well-considered view, but rudeness doesn&#039;t really convey with &quot;well-considered.&quot; Your good points are over-shadowed by invective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Blake, many of us would be more likely to listen to you if you weren&#8217;t so nasty in the way you address others. As far as I can tell, in your first comment on this topic you resorted to name-calling. I am always willing to listen to a well-considered view, but rudeness doesn&#8217;t really convey with &#8220;well-considered.&#8221; Your good points are over-shadowed by invective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hawkdriver</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/california-court-holds-rescuers-liable-for-injuries/comment-page-3/#comment-1737071</link>
		<dc:creator>hawkdriver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38170#comment-1737071</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Pffffffffffft.

selias on December 22, 2008 at 12:02 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Best comment and example on the entire thread. +10

I especially like the last sentence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Pffffffffffft.</p>
<p>selias on December 22, 2008 at 12:02 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Best comment and example on the entire thread. +10</p>
<p>I especially like the last sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Badger40</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/california-court-holds-rescuers-liable-for-injuries/comment-page-3/#comment-1737022</link>
		<dc:creator>Badger40</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38170#comment-1737022</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Mark Garnett on December 22, 2008 at 11:54 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thanks. I sometimes think I am alone in the wilderness!

&lt;blockquote&gt;Thanks to this ruling…I will question helping the next time. Instead I may just stand there like the 3 other capable dopes that day in Escondido…hoping they’re making a difference, each calling 911 on their cell phones…about the same accident…while a trapped 86 year old goes into shock and asphyxiates to death.
selias on December 22, 2008 at 12:02 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
No you won&#039;t. Bcs you are a good person. And good people do good things, regardless of the risk. 
All evil needs is for good men to do nothing. Don&#039;t lose hope.

&lt;blockquote&gt; I only hope everyone involved eventually have an accident after which people are force to eatch them perish because they feared legal liability should they lend aid. THAT’S justice.

TrickyDick on December 22, 2008 at 12:11 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I&#039;d like to think that way, too. But deep down, I don&#039;t think any of us here wishes that upon another person.
There are pockets of good in CA. At least when I lived in Carmichael as a kid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Mark Garnett on December 22, 2008 at 11:54 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Thanks. I sometimes think I am alone in the wilderness!</p>
<blockquote><p>Thanks to this ruling…I will question helping the next time. Instead I may just stand there like the 3 other capable dopes that day in Escondido…hoping they’re making a difference, each calling 911 on their cell phones…about the same accident…while a trapped 86 year old goes into shock and asphyxiates to death.<br />
selias on December 22, 2008 at 12:02 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>No you won&#8217;t. Bcs you are a good person. And good people do good things, regardless of the risk.<br />
All evil needs is for good men to do nothing. Don&#8217;t lose hope.</p>
<blockquote><p> I only hope everyone involved eventually have an accident after which people are force to eatch them perish because they feared legal liability should they lend aid. THAT’S justice.</p>
<p>TrickyDick on December 22, 2008 at 12:11 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;d like to think that way, too. But deep down, I don&#8217;t think any of us here wishes that upon another person.<br />
There are pockets of good in CA. At least when I lived in Carmichael as a kid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrickyDick</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/california-court-holds-rescuers-liable-for-injuries/comment-page-3/#comment-1736953</link>
		<dc:creator>TrickyDick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38170#comment-1736953</guid>
		<description>Legal decisions and laws that come from the land of fruits and nuts no longer surprise me.  Unfortunately, all too often, their inane, insane or mundane laws sometimes set precedent for the rest of the country.  I only hope everyone involved eventually have an accident after which people are force to eatch them perish because  they feared legal liability should they lend aid.  &lt;strong&gt;THAT&#039;S&lt;/strong&gt; justice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legal decisions and laws that come from the land of fruits and nuts no longer surprise me.  Unfortunately, all too often, their inane, insane or mundane laws sometimes set precedent for the rest of the country.  I only hope everyone involved eventually have an accident after which people are force to eatch them perish because  they feared legal liability should they lend aid.  <strong>THAT&#8217;S</strong> justice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: selias</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/california-court-holds-rescuers-liable-for-injuries/comment-page-3/#comment-1736928</link>
		<dc:creator>selias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38170#comment-1736928</guid>
		<description>Blake = bag-o-douche

I was a licensed EMT in Texas for 5 years. Did it on the weekends outside my normal day job. 

Since moving to California over 2 years ago, I have let my license expire, as unfortunately my regular job keeps me too busy these days. However, the knowledge and skills are still very much intact.

This past Thanksgiving, my relatives and I were traveling down the 78 in Escondido (just north of San Diego) heading to the Wild Animal Park. The 78 was jammed with traffic as usual, but especially worse being at the height of post Thanksgiving shopping. We witnessed an accident happen before our eyes involving 5 or 6 cars. My brother-in-law (a former USMC Scout Sniper, and always willing to lend a hand) and I pulled our car over and jumped out to give assistance, along with several other bystanders. In one of the cars...an 86 year old woman trapped inside (doors jammed from the impact). She was going into shock. We muscled her door open and carefully pulled her to safety. She was also gasping for air from smoke expelled from the airbag firing mechanism.

An ambulance didn&#039;t arrive on scene for another 8 minutes due to the traffic. We may have saved her life, and somewhere, she may be having at least one more great Christmas with her loved ones. I can think of more than 2 dozen reasons to extract a victim out of a smashed vehicle before a trained professional arrives...a potential explosion or fire not included.

Thanks to this ruling...I will question helping the next time. Instead I may just stand there like the 3 other capable dopes that day in Escondido...hoping they&#039;re making a difference, each calling 911 on their cell phones...about the same accident...while a trapped 86 year old goes into shock and asphyxiates to death.

The typical &quot;all-or-nothing&quot; argument you spew is a lot like your lower intestine, Blake...stinky. Just like the same slippery slope argument for abortion rights...that somehow the very rare instance of incest or rape or mother&#039;s life in jeopardy will be overlooked by the heartless pro-life advocates...the same way you decry that all Good Samaritans will mindlessly drag a victim out of the frying pan and into the fire...or oncoming big-rig traffic.

Pffffffffffft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blake = bag-o-douche</p>
<p>I was a licensed EMT in Texas for 5 years. Did it on the weekends outside my normal day job. </p>
<p>Since moving to California over 2 years ago, I have let my license expire, as unfortunately my regular job keeps me too busy these days. However, the knowledge and skills are still very much intact.</p>
<p>This past Thanksgiving, my relatives and I were traveling down the 78 in Escondido (just north of San Diego) heading to the Wild Animal Park. The 78 was jammed with traffic as usual, but especially worse being at the height of post Thanksgiving shopping. We witnessed an accident happen before our eyes involving 5 or 6 cars. My brother-in-law (a former USMC Scout Sniper, and always willing to lend a hand) and I pulled our car over and jumped out to give assistance, along with several other bystanders. In one of the cars&#8230;an 86 year old woman trapped inside (doors jammed from the impact). She was going into shock. We muscled her door open and carefully pulled her to safety. She was also gasping for air from smoke expelled from the airbag firing mechanism.</p>
<p>An ambulance didn&#8217;t arrive on scene for another 8 minutes due to the traffic. We may have saved her life, and somewhere, she may be having at least one more great Christmas with her loved ones. I can think of more than 2 dozen reasons to extract a victim out of a smashed vehicle before a trained professional arrives&#8230;a potential explosion or fire not included.</p>
<p>Thanks to this ruling&#8230;I will question helping the next time. Instead I may just stand there like the 3 other capable dopes that day in Escondido&#8230;hoping they&#8217;re making a difference, each calling 911 on their cell phones&#8230;about the same accident&#8230;while a trapped 86 year old goes into shock and asphyxiates to death.</p>
<p>The typical &#8220;all-or-nothing&#8221; argument you spew is a lot like your lower intestine, Blake&#8230;stinky. Just like the same slippery slope argument for abortion rights&#8230;that somehow the very rare instance of incest or rape or mother&#8217;s life in jeopardy will be overlooked by the heartless pro-life advocates&#8230;the same way you decry that all Good Samaritans will mindlessly drag a victim out of the frying pan and into the fire&#8230;or oncoming big-rig traffic.</p>
<p>Pffffffffffft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Garnett</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/california-court-holds-rescuers-liable-for-injuries/comment-page-3/#comment-1736916</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Garnett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38170#comment-1736916</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Badger40 on December 22, 2008 at 11:47 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Liberal creeps like Blake makes us Conservatives understand why we hate the far left sue happy jerks of the ACLU and other lawers that pray on fears of self-reliant people, people that want the ability to help and assist our neighbors in need.

Your post gets an A ++, I wish more people thought like you and we&#039;d have less welfare and more person responsibility.

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Badger40 on December 22, 2008 at 11:47 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Liberal creeps like Blake makes us Conservatives understand why we hate the far left sue happy jerks of the ACLU and other lawers that pray on fears of self-reliant people, people that want the ability to help and assist our neighbors in need.</p>
<p>Your post gets an A ++, I wish more people thought like you and we&#8217;d have less welfare and more person responsibility.</p>
<p>:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Badger40</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/california-court-holds-rescuers-liable-for-injuries/comment-page-3/#comment-1736895</link>
		<dc:creator>Badger40</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38170#comment-1736895</guid>
		<description>OK-I just showed up today. 
This Blake thing is way out of hand. 
Why is anyone bothering to reply to this individual after the vitriol he/she started to spew?
Without knowing the particulars of this case, I can only say that if the rescuer really believed she was doing a good thing &amp; tried her best, no matter what the outcome, it sets a dangerous precedent to persecute/prosecute her for it. 
If the rescuer was drunk &amp;/or stoned, then that is a separate issue. Even drunk &amp;/or stoned people do good deeds on occasion.
Bottom line-people can be inherently brave &amp; good-why would we want to mess with this?
Relying upon the govt (city, state, federal etc..) to &quot;save&quot; us is silly.
Where I live, we all have to help each other. EMT took 45 minutes to get to my husband&#039;s father years ago. He died of a heart attack while his son desperately administered CPR the whole time til they showed up.
If I get in a car accident out here, I have no choice but to rely upon my neighbors-many of them untrained medical professionals.
WTF is wrong with our society that we must fear helping another human being?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK-I just showed up today.<br />
This Blake thing is way out of hand.<br />
Why is anyone bothering to reply to this individual after the vitriol he/she started to spew?<br />
Without knowing the particulars of this case, I can only say that if the rescuer really believed she was doing a good thing &amp; tried her best, no matter what the outcome, it sets a dangerous precedent to persecute/prosecute her for it.<br />
If the rescuer was drunk &amp;/or stoned, then that is a separate issue. Even drunk &amp;/or stoned people do good deeds on occasion.<br />
Bottom line-people can be inherently brave &amp; good-why would we want to mess with this?<br />
Relying upon the govt (city, state, federal etc..) to &#8220;save&#8221; us is silly.<br />
Where I live, we all have to help each other. EMT took 45 minutes to get to my husband&#8217;s father years ago. He died of a heart attack while his son desperately administered CPR the whole time til they showed up.<br />
If I get in a car accident out here, I have no choice but to rely upon my neighbors-many of them untrained medical professionals.<br />
WTF is wrong with our society that we must fear helping another human being?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: House of Eratosthenes</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/california-court-holds-rescuers-liable-for-injuries/comment-page-3/#comment-1736794</link>
		<dc:creator>House of Eratosthenes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38170#comment-1736794</guid>
		<description>[...] Golden (Shower) State&#8217;s High Court has spoken: California court holds rescuers liable for injuries posted at 9:45 am on December 20, 2008 by Ed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Golden (Shower) State&#8217;s High Court has spoken: California court holds rescuers liable for injuries posted at 9:45 am on December 20, 2008 by Ed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maxx</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/20/california-court-holds-rescuers-liable-for-injuries/comment-page-3/#comment-1736764</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=38170#comment-1736764</guid>
		<description>Judicial activism by the court, pure and simple. The court Legislated from the bench and overturned a good law meant to help people in emergencies. But the smug anti-human, anti-common-sense liberals of the court decided this law was too bourgeois to bear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judicial activism by the court, pure and simple. The court Legislated from the bench and overturned a good law meant to help people in emergencies. But the smug anti-human, anti-common-sense liberals of the court decided this law was too bourgeois to bear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
