Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


McCain suddenly decides he’s opposed to bailouts

posted at 1:54 pm on December 19, 2008 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

A crowd-pleasing awakening, just six weeks too late. To quote Sandler, this information really would’ve been more useful yesterday.

I regret the President’s decision to give away over $17 billion to the domestic automakers. Just last week, the Senate rejected a bailout plan because it failed to provide assurances that the domestic manufacturers would fundamentally change the way they do business to ensure their long-term viability. I find it unacceptable that we would leave the American taxpayer with a tab of tens of billions of dollars while failing to receive any serious concessions from the industry.

He must be telling the truth because this sure doesn’t fit the new and improved centrist Maverick image he’s been cultivating lately. I don’t fault him for supporting TARP — I did so myself — but I’m wondering what “serious concessions” he thinks he extracted from Wall Street in that case. The GAO admitted two weeks ago that there’s been basically no oversight of the funds by Treasury; reporters can’t even get Paulson to tell them who got money and how it’s being used. Beyond that, McCain’s guilty here of the same sin that’s been plaguing other GOP bailout opponents — asserting that action is too expensive without the barest attempt to explain why inaction will be less so. If protecting jobs until the larger economic threat subsides isn’t worth doing, fair enough; just describe why. Here he is back on September 29 warning of an “hour of crisis” and the dire risk to families and small businesses from the credit crunch absent state intervention. Does he think the crisis is over now, or does he not think GM’s failure would do much to worsen it? Answers, please. Exit question: At least he’ll be back in Joe the Plumber’s good graces, though, right?


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

McCain 2012!

Chuck Schick on December 19, 2008 at 1:55 PM

I regret you didn’t follow this line of reasoning in October.

Vashta.Nerada on December 19, 2008 at 1:56 PM

That’s nice, RINO. We don’t really care. Your VP candidate is the only one that still demands respect, and a ton of it. Too bad you couldn’t spare a shred for her.

MadisonConservative on December 19, 2008 at 1:58 PM

Yeah. McCain is opposed to giving taxpayer money to U.S. automakers, but millions in taxpayer dollars to anti-American groups such as La Raza are perfectly okay.

I get it.

Gregor on December 19, 2008 at 1:59 PM

Narcissism, thy name is McCain.

JiangxiDad on December 19, 2008 at 2:00 PM

Sorry Mack, day late, dollar short. I hope you don’t run again in 2012. I voted against bho for you, sorry I did.
L

letget on December 19, 2008 at 2:01 PM

NarcissismFickleness, thy name is McCain.

JiangxiDad on December 19, 2008 at 2:00 PM

FIFY.

hoosiermama on December 19, 2008 at 2:02 PM

I want my vote back.

Bishop on December 19, 2008 at 2:02 PM

Does he think the crisis is over now, or does he not think GM’s failure would do much to worsen it? Answers, please.

I don’t think he has a clue.

Vashta.Nerada on December 19, 2008 at 2:02 PM

Makes sense. He has to appear conservative for his 2010 reelection run for the Senate.

Helloyawl on December 19, 2008 at 2:04 PM

Retire!

huckleberryfriend on December 19, 2008 at 2:04 PM

NarcissismFickleness LoserIdon’tevercaretohearfromagain, thy name is McCain.

JiangxiDad on December 19, 2008 at 2:00 PM

FIFY.

hoosiermama on December 19, 2008 at 2:02 PM

FIFM(me)

hoosiermama on December 19, 2008 at 2:04 PM

I voted against bho for you, sorry I did.

letget on December 19, 2008 at 2:01 PM

+1

MadisonConservative on December 19, 2008 at 2:04 PM

Screw you, mav, even though you’re right this once. Just screw you on general principle.
[Yawn]

jdub on December 19, 2008 at 2:05 PM

I find it unacceptable that we would leave the American taxpayer with a tab of tens of billions of dollars while failing to receive any serious concessions from the industry.

However, had Bush chosen to leave the taxpayer with a tab of hundreds of billions of dollars like we did for the bankers, that would be just fine.

BobMbx on December 19, 2008 at 2:05 PM

Please STFU and go away, you old dusty RINO!
Nobody cares.

HornetSting on December 19, 2008 at 2:06 PM

…and the man voted to the presidency of the Peanut Gallery pipes up….

…somebody want to tell me why Mr. Maverick has a 3-day waiting period on his principles…ensuring that he doesn’t, in the heat of the moment, rush out and do something useful….

…the man needs to look up “irrelevant” in the dictionary…he’ll find a picture of himself….

Puritan1648 on December 19, 2008 at 2:06 PM

McCain decided to hand the presidency off to Obama with his numbnut decision to support the bailout.
The guy has no principle in terms of philosophy.

He says he is a “Reagan conservative” because he is against government spending of the absurd kind, and pork.

The bailout was of the absurd kind of spending with pork!

As Giuliani said in the Republican National Convention, I would like to change it a bit and direct it to McCain in how he could stop making such erratic decisions: McCain, next time, call Sarah Palin.

At least we got 2012 to stop the bleeding with Sarah Palin.

jencab on December 19, 2008 at 2:06 PM

What a forkin fool.

David in ATL on December 19, 2008 at 2:08 PM

I honor the man for his service, both military and public office but I cannot help but think it’s time to relax, do some fishing on his property, take a couple of cruises and be a stay at home grampa.

FireBlogger on December 19, 2008 at 2:08 PM

I want my vote back.

Bishop on December 19, 2008 at 2:02 PM

…it’d be too much of a job to clean it…considering where it’s been, it would be rather like buffing up a turd….

…let it go…let it float off into the sunset…maybe it’ll show up in Obama’s morning grapefruit juice…we can hope….

Puritan1648 on December 19, 2008 at 2:09 PM

At least we got 2012 to stop the bleeding with Sarah Palin.

jencab on December 19, 2008 at 2:06 PM

Don’t be too sure about that.

She’s going to get attacked non-stop for the next four years.

Gregor on December 19, 2008 at 2:09 PM

So McCain, does this mean you finally figured out that you went from winning the election to losing it due to your vote for the $750 billion bailout with a side of pork?

Vashta.Nerada on December 19, 2008 at 2:10 PM

Somebody email this guy that he no longer matters.
Frankly Scarlett…

whitetop on December 19, 2008 at 2:11 PM

Play this video in a seperate browser tab while listening to this looser

Kini on December 19, 2008 at 2:11 PM

If protecting jobs until the larger economic threat subsides isn’t worth doing, fair enough; just describe why.

Like scientific models, there are business models that are predictable. There is too much inventory. We need to cut production because people are not buying as many cars. To do that we have to fire people.

Building more cars just to give people jobs is not going to ‘help’ anything. They could be more productive doing other things.

If they go bankrupt, then the UAW contracts are negotiated from scratch. Every penny that goes to GM is to pay their employees. GM hasn’t been profitable for a while because they only made money in their finance department.

In other words, they didn’t increase the value of the car, with GMAC, they made more money on the same car because they got the interest (so they could charge whatever they wanted as long as they could make the monthly payment).

Now the GMAC stuff is ’subprime’ (why they are justifying TARP funds likely). There is no way that GM can become profitable without a lucrative financial services arm siphoning money off the top.

Let them fail, their assets will be bought, jobs will be created OUTSIDE OF THE UAW. The UAW is dismantled. That is the only solution to the Big 3.

ThackerAgency on December 19, 2008 at 2:12 PM

How many voices does he have in his head? Is this the same one that told him to suspend his campaign?

sherry on December 19, 2008 at 2:12 PM

Don’t be too sure about that.

She’s going to get attacked non-stop for the next four years.

Gregor on December 19, 2008 at 2:09 PM

Thanks for the link. Good Lord the woman can not get a break!

jencab on December 19, 2008 at 2:13 PM

Hey, who’s the old guy? Oh yeah, he was Palin’s #2.

Sugar Land on December 19, 2008 at 2:13 PM

McCain 2012!

Chuck Schick on December 19, 2008 at 1:55 PM

Hopefully, you meant that as sarcasm because, uh, no thanks.

CP on December 19, 2008 at 2:13 PM

Hey listen its typical McCain, “I regret what the President……” , gee maybe if you showed some balls about some regret you had that the other party was doing instead of constantly trashing your own party, people might actually respect you.

MDWNJ on December 19, 2008 at 2:14 PM

John who?

wtis02575 on December 19, 2008 at 2:14 PM

Leading from the rear. We already know how well he supports his “troops”(Palin).

a capella on December 19, 2008 at 2:14 PM

Sit down Johnny.

Big Orange on December 19, 2008 at 2:14 PM

I want my vote back.

Bishop on December 19, 2008 at 2:02 PM

It was taken back, and given to Al Franken.

Tommy_G on December 19, 2008 at 2:14 PM

Wrong Way McCain strikes again. Here’s hoping Arizona Republicans decide to nominate someone new in 2010.

james23 on December 19, 2008 at 2:15 PM

I don’t think he has a clue.

When the Fanny Mae fiasco happened, McCain immediately bragged that he knew this was all going to happen years ago.

Then he spent the next few days blathering precisely as if he had no idea what was going on. And finally ‘Mr. Maverick’ decided to agree with every other politician in America that, yes, Henry Paulson is indeed God and we must give him all of America’s gross national product from now on.

This is one of at least a dozen missed opportunities during the campaign. A true conservative wouldn’t have batted an eye over this. In a time of crises, indecision is death.

logis on December 19, 2008 at 2:15 PM

Whatever happened to Straight Talk™? This is Circle Talk.

Oh, I miss you, Sarah.

hoosiermama on December 19, 2008 at 2:16 PM

Wrong Way McCain strikes again. Here’s hoping Arizona Republicans decide to nominate someone newa Republican in 2010.

james23 on December 19, 2008 at 2:15 PM

MDWNJ on December 19, 2008 at 2:16 PM

Piss off, Flintstone.

LimeyGeek on December 19, 2008 at 2:17 PM

I’m definitely biased because my dad is an auto-worker….still, I can’t figure out why Banks are being held to a lower standard and are being bailed out to the tune of hundreds of billions and it’s the auto industry’s loan of tens of billions that was finally the last straw for these folks.

Personally (even as the daughter of an auto-worker), I’m opposed to both bailouts (and any upcoming bailouts of Hollywood, farmers, journalists, colleges, etc).

I just can’t figure out why all these people that got on board for the bank bailout are opposed in principal to the auto bailout. If they could say, “Wow! I panicked and felt that something had to be done and now I see that bailouts are wrong and I regret my previous vote” that would be one thing. But, they’re just ignoring the $700 billion bail out and pretending to be on the taxpayer’s side by opposing a $17 billion bailout.

Up is down…left is right….

JadeNYU on December 19, 2008 at 2:18 PM

I don’t fault him for supporting TARP — I did so myself

Which is worse, the idea that you take economic cues from Mac, or that he takes them from you?

james23 on December 19, 2008 at 2:19 PM

Great American. Brave soldier. Fine human being. Lousy candidate 2008.

petefrt on December 19, 2008 at 2:20 PM

“I find it unacceptable that we would leave the American taxpayer with a tab of tens of billions of dollars while failing to receive any serious concessions from the industry.”

LOL!!! – What a moron!!!

If this wanker would have grown a set of balls
and said these very words BEFORE the first bail-out
we might be saying President elect McCain….

But Nooooo!!!!! – McCain at this point does not
matter and I really doubt he willl be able to win
another 6 years in 2010. Time for some people
with brains & balls to take over.

izoneguy on December 19, 2008 at 2:20 PM

But, they’re just ignoring the $700 billion bail out and pretending to be on the taxpayer’s side by opposing a $17 billion bailout.

Up is down…left is right….

JadeNYU on December 19, 2008 at 2:18 PM

Agreed. I actually thought the 700 billion dollar deal was a joke. Surely he was going to be laughed out of DC for demanding 700 billion dollars immediately ‘or else’. I don’t know why we gave the banks money.

But the auto industry is going to fail with or without this money. It is inevitable because they aren’t willing to do what they must do to survive and succeed. The UAW is going to cry themselves out of a job. They caused the bankruptcy (that they threatened with every strike). . . now they must deal with it.

ThackerAgency on December 19, 2008 at 2:21 PM

If Obama called for this bailout why do I believe that old John boy would be all for it?

Time to retire Johhny boy

upstate on December 19, 2008 at 2:21 PM

No he didn’t!!!

christene on December 19, 2008 at 2:21 PM

I can’t figure out why Banks are being held to a lower standard

JadeNYU on December 19, 2008 at 2:18 PM

Very easy. The banks have much more cash than the auto industry to slip into the pockets of those in Congress.

That is, after all, what this is all about.

Gregor on December 19, 2008 at 2:21 PM

I think what amazes me the most is the whole insanity of the way goverment tries to solve a problem.
The auto companies are going under because their cars are at least percieved as less quality than imports by the general population, and over the last 50 years the unions have ass raped them repeatedly until most union workers make more than graduates with PHDs. The solution, give the car companies billions. To do what?! That money is better spent using it for toilet paper. You want to actually help a little? Every billion dollars would allow 33,333 people to buy a car worth $30,000!!!!! At least if you gave 33,333 people vouchers for $30,000 to buy cars, the money would actually help more than the car company execs and fat ass UAW goons. Make it $100 bil and you have three million new cars on the road, and add a requirement to donate your used car to charity and you have another three million people who can’t afford cars get cars too! Of course, 3/4 of those vouchers would buy something other than the big three, but there again you just have natural selection…lol

Falconsword on December 19, 2008 at 2:24 PM

logis on December 19, 2008 at 2:15 PM

Rick Davis

joey24007 on December 19, 2008 at 2:24 PM

Lets see what would cause this turn around? Oh right he is running for Senator from Arizona…Has it occurred to anyone he lost his taste for the Presidency after the Economic Crisis hit the fan? He actually wants to stay a Senator from Arizona. McCain made a telling comment to Lindsey Graham, when they were coming back from a trip to Iraq. If those Military Service People are Fighting for their Country, I owe it to them to Run for President or words to that effect…meaning? He wasn’t all in when he ran for President and when the Financial Meltdown Happened, he actually pulled back…I hope I am wrong but go back and review what transpired. The Man is a fighter and he picked a fighter to run with him on his ticket. BUT there were places he wouldn’t go to WIN. Was his campaign in the end an empty gesture? I hope not, someone more inclined to fight tooth and nail could have been on the ticket- Romney,Thompson,Rudy and Yes Huckabee. I was pulling for Duncan Hunter.

Dr Evil on December 19, 2008 at 2:26 PM

I think we all just got Rick Rolled

Kini on December 19, 2008 at 2:27 PM

When I picture McCain…

It’s like I’m looking at a pigeon-covered statue with his finger in the air. To fill in the details…

– yes, he’s a caricature of the real thing
– yes, he’s also covered in pigeon-poop
– he doesn’t care that he’s covered in pigeon-poop
– he’s testing the wind of public opinion
– he’s using his middle finger

dominigan on December 19, 2008 at 2:28 PM

Juan “el weathervane” Queeg we hardly knew ye….

of course that WAS by design.

sven10077 on December 19, 2008 at 2:32 PM

Is McCain going to suspend his campaign to try to work something out? Oh wait….that didn’t work.

CP on December 19, 2008 at 2:33 PM

I don’t think he has a clue.

Vashta.Nerada on December 19, 2008 at 2:02 PM

Ding! Ding! Ding!

Nothing more to discuss here. There is no rhyme or reason to McCain’s positions. They are all over the map for a reason. There is no core intellectual philosophy with him. He simply draws conclusions based on what he feels at that particular time. And just to make matters worse, once he’s done blindly navigating himself to a position, he is unwaivering despite all evidence to the contrary and desite any and all contradictions pointed out to him. He’s nothing more than a stubborn, irrational, condescending lightweight.

Zetterson on December 19, 2008 at 2:39 PM

McCain voted against the bloated no child left behind.

McCain voted against the bloated medicare bill.

McCain has been a leading voice on the earmark abuse.

This is nothing new. McCain on Meet the Press before the election said the auto industry shouldn’t get a bailout. The conservative base was silent in defending McCain because of the financial vote.

The conservate base is about purity. If you aren’t perfect they destroy you.

McCain also before the election said he was against another stimulus package.

So instead of rallying around McCain on being against the auto bailout and the huge stimulus package that Obama was for the conservatives spread the lie that McCain was just like Obama.

The conservative McCain haters are saying they are happy he won.

Obama now has a filibuster proof senate with 59 dems and snowe from maine.

There are no checks and balances. This past election was about survival and making a goal line stand instead conservatives wanted purity.

Now Pelosi and Obama will pass a one trillion stimulus package. McCain would have vetoed Pelosi’s spending.

Now Obama will bail out the auto industry for the next 8 years every few months. McCain would have forced them to restructure.

And yet to this day with Obama and Pelosi having no checks and balances conservatives are still happy McCain lost.

They say McCain would have ruined conservatism.

Well now that Obama has a filibuster proof senate his laws will be permanent and there will be no conservatism left to fight for.

McCain is the most conservative candidate we have ever had.

The base spit on this war hero for Bush.

McCain is for building the fence which Obama will stop.

McCain faught to get Harriet Miers to withdraw which the conservative base never gave him credit for.

Instead of beating up McCain conservatives should have been rallying around him. McCain is no RINO he is a conservative.

I think conservatives don’t like him because of his smile. McCain got that weird smile from getting his teeth knocked out.

What a disgrace the american public spitting on McCain so now we have a rubber stamp Al Franken Congress with Obama.

And there is no filibuster when Snowe is a democrat giving democrats 60 votes on what they want.

But conservatives are still thrilled McCain lost and Obama can pick 6 supreme court justices.

Those conservatives who said they wouldn’t vote for McCain if he picked Ridge so we ended up with the disaster Palin and now we have no checks and balances and full throttle left nation.

So glad conservatives spit on McCain and gave us 8 years of Bush.

McCain would have veteod medicare bill. He voted against it.

McCain was against no child left behind.

But conservatives never bring up his good points they focus on his few bad bills like McCain/Feingold.

Conservative purity has given us marxism forever. But at least conservatives can be happy that McCain lost. They will always have that.

ryandan on December 19, 2008 at 2:41 PM

What Mccain says or thinks does matter anymore.He is a has been of the frist order.I would think hot air and other fine consev. sites would just let him fade away.He never was a consev. and tryed more than once to destory the consev. movement.If you think it,s going to be bad for the next 4 years.just think how bad it would have been with McCain as Pres..

thmcbb on December 19, 2008 at 2:41 PM

Conservative purity has given us marxism forever. But at least conservatives can be happy that McCain lost. They will always have that.

ryandan on December 19, 2008 at 2:41 PM

Yeah, he really lived by his “principles” when he SUSPENDED HIS CAMPAIGN to go back to Washington to add his two cents to the $700 billion. Wonder how much THAT cost us?
Uh, you know, just the election. No big deal
As far as Maverick representing….he represents EVERYONE but his base. He lost. We will rebuild.
I just wish he would just STFU and sit down.

HornetSting on December 19, 2008 at 2:44 PM

ryandan on December 19, 2008 at 2:41 PM

Was that a parody or were you actually serious?

Zetterson on December 19, 2008 at 2:45 PM

ryandan on December 19, 2008 at 2:41 PM

Is McCain’s mom commenting on Hotair?

Zetterson on December 19, 2008 at 2:47 PM

This event just further illustrates Juan McCain is nothing more (or less for that matter) than a mangy politician. Not a Statesman fit to lead our Country, just a cheap, opportunist politician.

Zorro on December 19, 2008 at 2:47 PM

ryandan on December 19, 2008 at 2:41 PM

Quick, name something that McCain and Bush disagree on aside from the bailout for the big 3 auto makers.

Zetterson on December 19, 2008 at 2:49 PM

Just go away McCain.

roux on December 19, 2008 at 2:50 PM

We already have an Al Franken in the Senate his name is John McCain.
Two people ran on the Republican ticket in 2008 a hero and a Senator from Arizona! Thanks for introducing America to the hero Senator, now STFU and go away quietly!

dhunter on December 19, 2008 at 2:55 PM

A real leader does so from the front, not from behind. He needs to fade from public life while most of us can still remember him fondly as a war hero.

Because there’s nothing heroic in this.

manwithblackhat on December 19, 2008 at 2:56 PM

zetterson, McCain disagreed with Bush on no child left behind. McCain wanted to leave more power with the states.

McCain was against Bush’s bloated medicare bill.

McCain was against Bush’s highway bill.

McCain would have vetoed many earmark bills.

McCain was against harriet miers.

McCain would not sign the assault weapons ban like Bush said he would.

McCain is so much more conservative than Bush and yet the conservative base embraced Bush and spit at McCain.

And I guarantee you McCain would have had higher approval ratings as president and not left us with Pelosi having 260 seats, Reid having 60 seats and a President Obama.

Picking Bush over McCain did unimaginable damage to the republican party.

ryandan on December 19, 2008 at 2:58 PM

I voted against bho for you, sorry I did.
letget on December 19, 2008 at 2:01 PM

+1
MadisonConservative on December 19, 2008 at 2:04 PM

What’s your problem, you got President Obama, not that evil traitor McCain – so what’s with your constant whine about it weeks later??

You should be happy that it all turned out this way.

wise_man on December 19, 2008 at 3:01 PM

Mac, please just shut up and go away. I voted for you (well, against Obama is more accurate), but I’d be so happy if I never saw you or heard from you again.

califcon on December 19, 2008 at 3:04 PM

That ship has sailed…..my friend.

Dr.Cwac.Cwac on December 19, 2008 at 3:05 PM

Coulda, shoulda, woulda yep thats our Johnny.

kanda on December 19, 2008 at 3:05 PM

The whole election was a senior moment for John.

notagool on December 19, 2008 at 3:06 PM

ryandan on December 19, 2008 at 2:58 PM

Fair enough. I’d still say picking either one of those two options is a conservative bridge to nowhere.

And I still think its rather insane to attempt to make the case that John McAmnesty is a Conservative. McCain/Feingold? McCain/Kennedy? Arguing in favor of giving social security to illegal aliens? We have the video footage and the legislation has his name on it.

Zetterson on December 19, 2008 at 3:08 PM

John McCain is taking the correct position opposing the Bush auto bailout. He flirted with opposing the Bush bank bailout and should have done so; that would have made sense of his suspending his campaign. Opposition to this kind of Government bailout is consistent with McCain’s historical conservative economic positions. McCain is NOT a RINO. So, give him a break. He is still a U.S. Senator, and we need every Senator we can muster to oppose Obama socialism in the days ahead.

Phil Byler on December 19, 2008 at 3:12 PM

If protecting jobs until the larger economic threat subsides isn’t worth doing, fair enough; just describe why.

Did we bail out the horse-and-buggy makers during the 1920’s depression?

We can’t spend our way back into prosperity.

Screw the US automakers. I have never driven anything owned by the Japanese. I’ve already paid my fair share to the company. Telling me I owe them any more is socialistic bull.

angelat0763 on December 19, 2008 at 3:16 PM

Let’s face it. The Obama campaign nailed it when they started referring to McCain as erratic. The label stuck, ultimately, because it was true.

EMD on December 19, 2008 at 3:16 PM

McCain 2012!

Chuck Schick on December 19, 2008 at 1:55 PM

Only if the Ghost Whisperer can speak on his behalf.

Badger40 on December 19, 2008 at 3:17 PM

are we supposed to “stand up and fight” now?

joey24007 on December 19, 2008 at 3:17 PM

Does he have any opinion on World War I?

Because that’s just about as relevant, at this point.

NoDonkey on December 19, 2008 at 3:19 PM

The auto companies are going under because their cars are at least percieved as less quality than imports by the general population, and over the last 50 years the unions have ass raped them repeatedly until most union workers make more than graduates with PHDs.

That’s exactly right. And the reason they have that reputation is largely because the last time we bailed their sorry butts out by imposing import tariffs, they responded by producing some of the worst cars in history. (K-Cars, anybody?)

angelat0763 on December 19, 2008 at 3:19 PM

McCain wanted Obama to win, for its historic significance. Once you realise that, it all makes sense.

MattMacD on December 19, 2008 at 3:22 PM

How long are we going to be abused with posts about what John F’n McCain said? Who cares! He is a pimple on the butt of Presidential Politics and won’t be long remembered…and that is just as it should be! A small politician acting like a small politician…

sabbott on December 19, 2008 at 3:30 PM

Yeah. McCain is opposed to giving taxpayer money to U.S. automakers, but millions in taxpayer dollars to anti-American groups such as La Raza are perfectly okay.

Well put.

S on December 19, 2008 at 3:36 PM

Johnny come lately…

mindhacker on December 19, 2008 at 3:37 PM

Such a tool.

At this point, I’m glad he lost.

What was Palin thinking?????

Dorvillian on December 19, 2008 at 3:42 PM

Narcissism, thy name is McCain.

JiangxiDad on December 19, 2008 at 2:00 PM

Bush is for it… Ergo McCain must be against with extra bitterness because I’m sure that McCain blames Bush for his loss.

Illinidiva on December 19, 2008 at 3:53 PM

Bush is for it… Ergo McCain must be against with extra bitterness because I’m sure that McCain blames Bush for his loss.

Illinidiva on December 19, 2008 at 3:53 PM

a nice succinct summary of Juan Queeg’s last 8 years…

sven10077 on December 19, 2008 at 3:54 PM

Bush is the most to blame for McCain’s loss after Palin.

Key number 10 percent.

10 percent of independents right before the election approved of Bush’s performance.

We think of Bush’s approval ratings in the mid to upper twenties but almost all of that comes from republicans.

Bush still gets around 60 percent republican support. He gets 10 percent support from independents.

I mean we lost in 2006 without McCain. We lost the three special elections without McCain on the ticket last year.

If it wasn’t for clayton williams going off message he would have been governor instead of ann richards and bush wouldn’t have been able to run for governor in 1994 and McCain would now be ending his second term.

In polls in 2000 McCain was leading Gore by huge margins. He would have coasted to victory and had coatails for senate races.

ryandan on December 19, 2008 at 4:00 PM

ryandan on December 19, 2008 at 2:41 PM

When McCain was called Bush III during the election, he should have pointed out that he voted against the bloated no child left behind.

When McCain was called Bush III during the election, he should have pointed out that he voted against the bloated medicare bill.

McCain’s campaign should have defended his running mate’s record of slashing earmarks in her state instead of letting the Democrats push the lie that she didn’t kill the Bridge To Nowhere and pretend that she was still Mayor of Wasilla.

McCain screwed up the financial crisis. Conservatives were quiet because watching the Republican nominee commit ritual hari kari is a solemn affair.

The conservate base has a long memory, like the elephant. If you burn them, they remember and are slow to forgive.

McCain also before the election said he was against another stimulus package. He still voted for the financial bailout.

So instead of rallying around McCain, conservatives voted for him but wondered why he never pinned the financial crisis on the Democrats and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and called Obama out on ALL of his associations. They assumed McCain must be just like Obama but HOPED he wasn’t.

The conservative McCain haters are happy that Obama won. If McCain didn’t have the guts to go after a radical far left affirmative action candidate, he didn’t want the presidency badly enough. He wouldn’t have had the energy or creativity too fix our government. McCain didn’t have the decency to defend his own running mate. He engaged in petty slandering of her name immediately after the election. Conservatives feel they dodged a bullet. At least they can watch Obama get into more trouble than Bush did and heckle the liberals.

Obama now has a filibuster proof senate with 59 dems and Snowe from Maine… thank the RNC.

This past election was about survival and making a goal line stand and conservatives voted for McCain. Some stayed home, but Obama won because Rockefeller Republicans voted for the hip new Dem.

Now Pelosi and Obama will pass a one trillion stimulus package. McCain might have vetoed Pelosi’s spending.

Now Obama will bail out the auto industry for the next 8 years every few months. McCain might have forced them to restructure.

And yet to this day with Obama and Pelosi having no checks and balances conservatives are still happy McCain lost. So screw the 52% who thought Obama would pay their mortgage.

McCain would have ruined conservatism. He has allowed the scapegoating of social conservatives, he betrayed fiscal conservatives during the bailout and his Maverick talk is just doing whatever he wants – amnesty, healthcare or cap and trade laws.

Obama doesn’t have a mandate, and the Republicans have a shot at taking back Congress in 2010.

Reagan is the best conservative President we have ever had.

McCain let Rove define him in 2000 then let Axelrod define him as Bush.

McCain is for amnesty.

McCain will always be remembered for the Gang of Fourteen.

McCain is a RINO.

McCain gets that weird smile before he makes some asshole comment like, “My corpse is still warm.”

Conservatives defended McCain’s service record when liberal idiots called him McBush, McLame and McWarmonger.

And there is no filibuster when Snowe is a democrat giving democrats 60 votes on what they want. In case you missed it.

McCain lost. He lost.

Conservatives wouldn’t vote for McCain if he picked Ridge, because he was boring and too closely aligned with the Bush administration. We ended up with the Palin who is the best thing to happen to the conservative movement in a long time.

So glad McCain spit on Bush and then had to run against the cheap shots he hurled at his own party while he was palling around with the Democrats.

When McCain was called Bush III during the election, he should have pointed out that he voted against the bloated no child left behind.

When McCain was called Bush III during the election, he should have pointed out that he voted against the bloated medicare bill.

McCain didn’t actually successfully pass too many of his own bills, and he loves bringing up McCain/Feingold. It’s like Keeting Five never happened.

Conservative betrayal has given us Marxism forever. McCain can go back to being a Democrat, and the world can marvel at how America elected its first black communist President.

FIFY

chunderroad on December 19, 2008 at 4:02 PM

Dear John,

Don’t go away mad, just go away.

Yes, this is a “Dear John” letter.

Sincerely,
Done That

Done That on December 19, 2008 at 4:04 PM

I don’t fault him for supporting TARP — I did so myself

You should not have. If you adhered to basic principles, you would see that they are fundamentally the same, and both are impractical and immoral.

JDPerren on December 19, 2008 at 4:06 PM

JOHN MCCAIN YOU DO NOT SPEAK FOR ANYONE IN THE REPULBICAN PARTY. SHUT UP, RETIRE, TAKE CARE OF YOUR PERSONAL SCANDALS AND STEP DOWN.

RNC 202-863-8500

mccain’s office 202-224-6154

nondhimmie on December 19, 2008 at 4:18 PM

I find it unacceptable that we would leave the American taxpayer with a tab of tens of billions of dollars while failing to receive any serious concessions from the industry.

What serious concessions was McShame demanding from all the people whose mortgages he wanted to pay for them?

This guy is a joke.

I think his mother has to hold her nose every time he visits her.

progressoverpeace on December 19, 2008 at 4:20 PM

Phil Byler on December 19, 2008 at 3:12 PM

Put down the crackpipe.

Fletch54 on December 19, 2008 at 4:25 PM

I question the timing!

Princeps on December 19, 2008 at 5:06 PM

McCain suddenly as usual decides he’s opposed to bailouts whatever a Republican President supports. Dammit, if he can’t be a Republican President, why the hell should anyone alse get to be??!

drunyan8315 on December 19, 2008 at 5:15 PM

To chund,

Palin is the worse thing to ever happen to conservatism.

She opened the seas for the middle to flock to the marxist Obama.

Obama was getting 28 percent of independents before Palin and won 60 percent.

Palin is one of the main reasons why Obama will pack the supreme court.

You need a candidate that can appeal also to independents and Palin is a disaster in that area.

Reagan was a winner because he got reagan democrats and independents and moderate republicans.

10 percent of the electorate thought palin was ready to be president.

The Palin wing of the party destroyed conservatism.

Palin made independents flock to Obama. Clinton voters that couldn’t stand Obama voted for him because of Palin.

Palin did the impossible she becamse the issue not Obama.

Polls show McCain would have done better without her.

Far more voters said they were less likely to vote for McCain because of Palin.

Palin was a disaster in the cities with her talk of small towns are the most patriotic.

Only Palin could have made Couric’s stature rise.

Talking about healthcare being helped by the bailout.

She was a disaster.

If you want the most liberal candidate to dominate the middle have Palin as your candidate.

The worst part about Palin is it causes voters in the middle who would have supported McCain to support Obama. That is a double punch. Votes taken away from McCain’s column and added to Obama’s.

Palin should never be involved with national politics. Independent voters view her as the plague. Only someone that would want to hand the democrats the election on a silver platter would want her ever on the ticket.

ryandan on December 19, 2008 at 5:15 PM

Thank goodness there were no “serious concessions from the industry”.

Serious concessions here would mean that Detroit was forced to build Democrat politically correct cars that almost no one wants to buy.

RJL on December 19, 2008 at 5:20 PM

Comment pages: 1 2


You must be logged in to post a comment.