Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Video: Blago Democrats, plus court hands hot potato to legislature

posted at 6:00 pm on December 17, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Republicans in Illinois want a special election to fill Barack Obama’s empty Senate seat, and yesterday’s move by Democratic leadership in the state legislature to block a bill authorizing one has them seeing red. They produced a new ad pointing out the connections between Mike Madigan and Emil Jones to Rod Blagojevich and accuse them of stalling to protect their party’s lock on the position. They want Illinois voters to let the two legislative leaders know that current Illinois leadership can’t be trusted with an appointment:

This ad takes a better, more straightforward tack than the RNC efforts over the past week. The Blagojevich scandal may eventually get linked to Obama, more likely to his staff, but the GOP would be better advised not to sound that alarm until evidence appears of those connections. Today’s revelation about Eric Holder and his Blagojevich-Rezko connection might be an example of how this scandal will unfold, but it’s better to let it unfold naturally than to make accusations ahead of the facts.

In another development, the Illinois Supreme Court surprised no one by rejecting Attorney General Lisa Madigan’s attempts to have Blagojevich declared politically incompetent to exercise the duties of office:

The Illinois Supreme Court today rejected Atty. Gen. Lisa Madigan’s attempt to have disgraced Gov. Rod Blagojevich declared unable to hold the office of Illinois chief executive, court officials said.

The high court, without comment, denied Madigan’s attempt to file a complaint with justices arguing Blagojevich’s fitness to serve. The court also rejected Madigan’s attempt for a temporary restraining order, aimed at preventing him from using state law to appoint a U.S. Senate replacement for President-elect Barack Obama. …

Justices, again without comment, also rejected a private petition seeking to remove Blagojevich from office for disability under the state constitution.

The lawsuit was a bad idea, except perhaps politically to give AG Madigan an opportunity to look busy.  David Freddoso believes that Madigan wanted to avoid looking passive in the face of the biggest case of political corruption in decades.  Since Madigan has aspirations to succeed Blagojevich (or Quinn, if impeached), she needed to show off for Illinois voters.

Rick Klein at ABC says that the burden shifts back to the legislature to deal with the crisis:

The ruling keeps the onus on the state legislature — which has just begun what could be long impeachment proceedings — to seek Blagojevich’s removal. In short, the easy way out for state Democrats has just been slammed shut.

No one seriously thought the Madigan lawsuit had a prayer of taking the burden off of the House, but Klein’s more right than at first blush.  Blagojevich signaled strongly today that he would have to get carried out of the governor’s office, kicking and screaming all the way.  Without a resignation, Blagojevich keeps all of the power of his office, including the power to appoint a replacement for Barack Obama. Nothing’s stopping Blagojevich from making an appointment, and nothing will until the legislature either impeaches him or changes the law for a special election.

Michael Madigan said earlier today than impeachment and removal could take months.  Unless the legislature acts to call a special election, it could take that long to fill that Senate seat.  Illinois Democrats can’t have it both ways — they have to call a special election or watch Blagojevich ruin someone’s career by appointing them to the post.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

How corrupt is the Illinois Supreme Court if they won’t even HEAR the complaint?

cannonball on December 17, 2008 at 6:05 PM

Meanwhile Harry Reid is going to be one Democratic vote short. Schadenfreude.

Wethal on December 17, 2008 at 6:08 PM

Corruption goes all the way up to the glass ceiling.

christene on December 17, 2008 at 6:08 PM

This ad takes a better, more straightforward tack than the RNC efforts over the past week.

Yes, because it has an action item for the viewer — demand a special election.

I hope to goodness the Illinois Republicans have been working hard to identify a strong candidate and the resources to fund his or her “campaign.”

Y-not on December 17, 2008 at 6:13 PM

Hot Rod can still work his way out of this if he applies maximum leverage in the right places. I’ll tell you one thing,..all his calls to the top thugs are now being made on cell phones with prepaid minutes, bought for cash and thrown away after one use. All Obama and Holder have to do is get a couple of first downs, run the ball into the line, take a knee, and run out the clock. If Barry throws him over the side, you can bet there is little with which Blago can hurt him. If Blago survives, Barry is dirty, but I just don’t see how even The One would be that arrogant politically. Time will tell,..that and what Fitz has in mind for his next career move.

a capella on December 17, 2008 at 6:22 PM

Ed,

Your killer-as-usual analysis escapes me here:

“…or watch Blagojevich ruin someone’s career by appointing them to the post.”

Why, in Illinois, would such an appointment ruin anyone’s career? Are you suggesting that voters would be hostile to the person? That such an appointment can only indicate superior and traceable graft?

I’m missing it… because I’m not sure that voters in Illinois, collectively speaking, care about corruption. So I figure that you must mean something else…

beatcanvas on December 17, 2008 at 6:22 PM

Skid marks on the toilet bowl……………..

…………. elections do have consequences, don’t they?

Seven Percent Solution on December 17, 2008 at 6:23 PM

First, let the story speak for itself. If Rahm Emanuel is on twenty-one tapes wheeling and dealing with Blago he’s likely toast.

Second, the watchword should be “follow the facts.” In Blago-gate, Republicans should push to get out the findings of the transition team’s internal review and insist Emanuel answer questions about his role in filling the vacant Senate seat. Fight to get the facts, argue for transparency, and see where it leads.

Third, no attack ads and no over-the-top email blitzes from the Republican National Committee. The RNC isn’t known for finesse and it shows. Because the RNC doesn’t rank high with the voters or the media on credibility, less is likely more from them right now.

Finally, remember the mantra of Rahm Emanuel: “Never let a serious crisis go to waste.” Well, a serious scandal should not go to waste either. But the scandal must really be a scandal. And it must be serious. So see #1.

When there is an issue of good governance, such as insisting that the Illinois Democrats run a special election rather than appoint the next senator, Republicans shouldn’t shy away from a fight. But they do risk to their own image and political viability by conducting a ham-handed campaign-style attack.

Jen Rubin’s four points for the GOP versus Obama. Somebody must be on the same wavelength in IL.

Wethal on December 17, 2008 at 6:25 PM

He won’t be impeached and he’ll win re-election.

You heard it here first.

lorien1973 on December 17, 2008 at 6:29 PM

The Illinois Democrats remind me of a child hiding his head under a pillow and kicking his feet in anger. pathetic.

kirkill on December 17, 2008 at 6:32 PM

Time to pop some more corn!

mindhacker on December 17, 2008 at 6:38 PM

There is about much chance of Illinois of having an election, as trying to find an honest politician in Chicago…it ain’t going to happen.

right2bright on December 17, 2008 at 6:39 PM

It will be interesting to see what evidence (other than the criminal complaint, which is allegations) is presented in the impeachment trial, as Fitz will not let any witnesses talk before they testify in his trial, and who knows when that will be, except some time next year.

Wethal on December 17, 2008 at 6:47 PM

Blago, you got three choices. You, Michelle Obama, or Alan Keyes.

Iblis on December 17, 2008 at 7:01 PM

Schadenfreude.

Wethal on December 17, 2008 at 6:08 PM

Its a beautiful thing, isn’t it?

flyawaybird on December 17, 2008 at 7:02 PM

2 points of interest:

1) Patrick Fitzgerald was appointed by the Dems to find the Plame leak. 6 months after he found Richard Armitage (aka “the leak”) he pressed charges against Scooter Libby (R) for perjury. When Blago was indicted, Fitzie told ALL OF US that Obama is NOT implicated nor targeted by this scandal…

2) Nevermind that Obama’s newly appointed Chief of Staff was also trying to SELL his own Congressional District 5 seat (aka CD5 in the complaint), you know, along with that Senate seat…

So after all that, do ANY of you expect Fitzie to actually go after Obama? Especially after that sell-out press conference where he SPECIFICALLY said “Obama is not under investigation”? Puh-lease.

Califemme on December 17, 2008 at 7:12 PM

Califemme, no we don’t expect Fitz to go afer Obama. But he may go after people around Obama, thus tarnishing the One’s
halo a bit, and making it clear that Obama is no new kind of politician, but just a shrewd machine pol who managed not to get caught. (Obama was Blago’s campaign manager in 2002, by the way.)

The drip, drip, drip will be, in Obama’s favorite dismissive term, a distraction. It will diminish his political capital, which he has to carefully spend, given his grand plans to change the world as we know it.

Every part of the news cycle that focuses on this will take public attention away from the way the One is making the Brave New World. It strengthen Harry and Nancy.

It just makes for great political theatre for us.

Wethal on December 17, 2008 at 7:19 PM

Wait wait wait, I forgot a choice:
Blago names Fitzgerald. Now whatdya do?

Iblis on December 17, 2008 at 7:34 PM

They produced a new ad pointing out the connections between Mike Madigan and Emil Jones to Rod Blagojevich and accuse them of stalling to protect their party’s lock on the position.

Emil Jones. Isn’t that the guy who made Obama into a US Senator by putting his name on pretty much every important piece of IL legislation, to the chagrin of pretty much every other Democrat legislator in IL?

Michael in MI on December 17, 2008 at 7:37 PM

Michael in MI on December 17, 2008 at 7:37 PM

Yes.

Wethal on December 17, 2008 at 7:44 PM

This illustrates that republicans are pikers compared to democrats when it comes to corruption.

jukin on December 17, 2008 at 7:53 PM

after all of this, if blago appoints someone, anyone, can the US Senate then refuse to sit them because of some harry reid reason?

kelley in virginia on December 17, 2008 at 8:00 PM

Yes, the Senate can refuse to seat someone. Whether Harry could get enough to go along with him is another thing.

Wethal on December 17, 2008 at 8:07 PM

If they do decide to have a special election, i suggest the GOP offer up a can’t miss candidate….Ditka!

DrW on December 17, 2008 at 8:18 PM

Meanwhile Harry Reid is going to be one Democratic vote short. Schadenfreude.

Wethal on December 17, 2008 at 6:08 PM

I approve this message.

Schadenfreude on December 17, 2008 at 8:23 PM

The Illinois R’s have a website called Friends of Blago. It’s got a big spider web with empty oblongs in which they’ve been placing pictures.

Pat Quinn, Mike Madigan, John Cullerton and Emil Jones are up right now. You click on the photos and you get a nice rundown of how that person is connected to Blago!

Eight more spots waiting to be filled…

INC on December 17, 2008 at 8:29 PM

SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (AP) – An attorney for Rod Blagojevich says the embattled Illinois governor will not appoint someone to replace Barack Obama in the U.S. Senate.

Attorney Ed Genson says Senate leaders have already said they won’t accept an appointment by Blagojevich, so there’s no reason for the Democratic governor to select someone.

Blagojevich has been charged with scheming to auction off the position to the highest bidder.

The allegation prompted calls to strip the governor of his power to choose a new senator. But Democratic lawmakers dropped that idea.

That has led to speculation about whether Blagojevich would try to make an appointment despite his legal and political problems.

New from Drudge. So it’s an election (which seems to be off the table for now) or waiting until Blago is out, one way or the other, and the Lt. Gov. steps in.

Wethal on December 17, 2008 at 8:35 PM

How corrupt is the Illinois Supreme Court if they won’t even HEAR the complaint?

cannonball on December 17, 2008 at 6:05 PM

More corrupt that you could possibly imagine! Almost every member on that court has ties to the Chicago Democratic Machine, and the Machine is run by his royal highness, King Richard Shortshanks, aka Mayor Daley of Chicago.

pilamaye on December 17, 2008 at 8:46 PM

Blagojevich has known for a while now that he’s in the catbird seat and for at least a week he’s letting it be known, to hell with the senate seat, pay me to leave or Obamanation gets to deal with their first national disaster.

Speakup on December 17, 2008 at 10:05 PM

This ad takes a better, more straightforward tack than the RNC efforts over the past week.

Yes, because it has an action item for the viewer — demand a special election.

Totaly agree; it doesn’t go too far, and is basicaly a call for good, ethical, accountable government.

I hope to goodness the Illinois Republicans have been working hard to identify a strong candidate and the resources to fund his or her “campaign.”

Y-not on December 17, 2008 at 6:13 PM

D-I-T-K-A

Red State State of Mind on December 17, 2008 at 10:14 PM

So, Lisa Madigan’s motion is denied and the impeachment process is already showing signs it will lurch well into 2009.
Meanwhile, the local PBS TV station has reported that Fitzgerald’s office is seeking to freeze Blago’s campaign fund. With no evidence that Ed Genson intends to duplicate the generosity shown by Winston & Strawn in its gratis defense of ex-governor George Ryan, Blagojevich is staring at some serious cash flow challenges. Resignation? Not going to do it; wouldn’t be prudent.

Here’s a thought. Why not let some time pass, put on a business-as-usual performance and let the impeachment carnival in Springfield play on? Then, appoint a squeaky clean Jim Edgar/Mark Kirk-caliber Republican to the Senate and dare Harry Reid to find him/her unfit.

Barnestormer on December 17, 2008 at 10:30 PM

Anything that can possibly cancel the Rahm and Eric show is worth supporting. That pair is a twin scumsicle that Good Humor couldn’t sell.

SKYFOX on December 18, 2008 at 5:43 AM

Let Blago appoint Oprah to the seat and then have the dems in Congress refuse to seat her.

eaglewingz08 on December 18, 2008 at 6:47 AM

Rahm continues to be the corpse-on-deck in this whole matter. I think it could get messy for Holder but probably not. Rahm is not going to make it to DC.

Remember that Fitz is smart enough to not release his best stuff at once. He wasn’t happy having to pull the trigger when he did but he had to, in order to stop Blago. That doesn’t mean he gave up everything. He only gave up what he had to.

The Illinois GOP is doing the right thing here. The Dems know they have limited options now and are trying to force this through the legislature. The Republicans need to keep up the pressure and make sure that Illinois citizens, ignorant as they are, are in the loop.

Exit question — does Harry Reid know what Fitz knows and if he does, is that why he has backed off commenting on this whole affair; after a week of non-stop calls for Blago to resign?

Super Bonus Exit Question — Is Obama going to have to give an address to the nation before or after January 20th aplogizing for the role of his advisors in this corruption and telling us that they have all been swept out?

grdred944 on December 18, 2008 at 11:39 AM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.