<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The point Kurtz misses on Sweet Caroline</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/17/the-point-kurtz-misses-on-sweet-caroline/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/17/the-point-kurtz-misses-on-sweet-caroline/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:03:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul_in_NJ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/17/the-point-kurtz-misses-on-sweet-caroline/comment-page-1/#comment-1726138</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul_in_NJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=37731#comment-1726138</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Ted, who won a Senate seat in 1962 with his brother in the White House, would have been laughed off the field if he had a different last name.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&quot;If your name was Edward Moore instead of Edward Moore Kennedy, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_J._McCormack,_Jr.&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;your candidacy would be a farce&lt;/a&gt;.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Ted, who won a Senate seat in 1962 with his brother in the White House, would have been laughed off the field if he had a different last name.</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;If your name was Edward Moore instead of Edward Moore Kennedy, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_J._McCormack,_Jr." rel="nofollow">your candidacy would be a farce</a>.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul_in_NJ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/17/the-point-kurtz-misses-on-sweet-caroline/comment-page-1/#comment-1726121</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul_in_NJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=37731#comment-1726121</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;In the context of an appointment, that looks a lot more like the kind of pay-for-play politics that we saw in Illinois&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Pikers! Pikers, I say -- here in NJ, pay-to-play is &lt;em&gt;legalized&lt;/em&gt; bribery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>In the context of an appointment, that looks a lot more like the kind of pay-for-play politics that we saw in Illinois</p></blockquote>
<p>Pikers! Pikers, I say &#8212; here in NJ, pay-to-play is <em>legalized</em> bribery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speakup</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/17/the-point-kurtz-misses-on-sweet-caroline/comment-page-1/#comment-1725843</link>
		<dc:creator>Speakup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=37731#comment-1725843</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Ted, who won a Senate seat in 1962 with his brother in the White House, and would have been laughed off the field if he had a different last name.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What in a name, a difference makes. 

Ted twern&#039;t Jack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Ted, who won a Senate seat in 1962 with his brother in the White House, and would have been laughed off the field if he had a different last name.</p></blockquote>
<p>What in a name, a difference makes. </p>
<p>Ted twern&#8217;t Jack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HotAirJosef</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/17/the-point-kurtz-misses-on-sweet-caroline/comment-page-1/#comment-1725599</link>
		<dc:creator>HotAirJosef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=37731#comment-1725599</guid>
		<description>Bang on.
I&#039;d prefer Rudy Giuliani get appointed.  To 90% of the Republican Party and 99% of HotAir commenters, he&#039;s a Democrat.  (Okay, I admit it, I&#039;m part of the 10 and 1%).  And Sir Rudy would only stay on as an Independent (Giuliani party) until a new election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bang on.<br />
I&#8217;d prefer Rudy Giuliani get appointed.  To 90% of the Republican Party and 99% of HotAir commenters, he&#8217;s a Democrat.  (Okay, I admit it, I&#8217;m part of the 10 and 1%).  And Sir Rudy would only stay on as an Independent (Giuliani party) until a new election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JM Hanes</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/17/the-point-kurtz-misses-on-sweet-caroline/comment-page-1/#comment-1725576</link>
		<dc:creator>JM Hanes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=37731#comment-1725576</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot; All of them were elected to their positions.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s not all that&#039;s different.  Does Kurtz actually think GWB would have been an &quot;instantly plausible presidential candidate&quot; if he hadn&#039;t been Governor of Texas first?

As for Caroline, the public loves her because she kept a low profile and stayed &lt;i&gt;out&lt;/i&gt; of politics. I wouldn&#039;t mind seeing  Camelot take its rightful place in the dustbin of history, and  I believe Caroline&#039;s popularity would take a serious hit -- if it weren&#039;t for a singular advantage she shares with Obama.  Caroline is a media darling and the press will maintain a respectful distance at every conceivable turn.   If you&#039;ve heard anyone ask her a single question, or even mention Mr. what&#039;s-his-name and their children, please raise your hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8221; All of them were elected to their positions.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s not all that&#8217;s different.  Does Kurtz actually think GWB would have been an &#8220;instantly plausible presidential candidate&#8221; if he hadn&#8217;t been Governor of Texas first?</p>
<p>As for Caroline, the public loves her because she kept a low profile and stayed <i>out</i> of politics. I wouldn&#8217;t mind seeing  Camelot take its rightful place in the dustbin of history, and  I believe Caroline&#8217;s popularity would take a serious hit &#8212; if it weren&#8217;t for a singular advantage she shares with Obama.  Caroline is a media darling and the press will maintain a respectful distance at every conceivable turn.   If you&#8217;ve heard anyone ask her a single question, or even mention Mr. what&#8217;s-his-name and their children, please raise your hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: perroviejo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/17/the-point-kurtz-misses-on-sweet-caroline/comment-page-1/#comment-1725408</link>
		<dc:creator>perroviejo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=37731#comment-1725408</guid>
		<description>Well, at least Caroline isn&#039;t as inexperienced as Sarah Palin.

/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, at least Caroline isn&#8217;t as inexperienced as Sarah Palin.</p>
<p>/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GarandFan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/17/the-point-kurtz-misses-on-sweet-caroline/comment-page-1/#comment-1725134</link>
		<dc:creator>GarandFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=37731#comment-1725134</guid>
		<description>Hell, just rename the Senate the House of Lords.  We&#039;ll save a bundle on elections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hell, just rename the Senate the House of Lords.  We&#8217;ll save a bundle on elections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UltimateBob</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/17/the-point-kurtz-misses-on-sweet-caroline/comment-page-1/#comment-1725066</link>
		<dc:creator>UltimateBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=37731#comment-1725066</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The Washington Post is the &lt;strong&gt;house organ &lt;/strong&gt;of Congress and the Democrat National Committee. 

NoDonkey on December 17, 2008 at 8:30 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

... and not the kind of organ that plays music, but the kind that shrinks in the swimming pool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The Washington Post is the <strong>house organ </strong>of Congress and the Democrat National Committee. </p>
<p>NoDonkey on December 17, 2008 at 8:30 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230; and not the kind of organ that plays music, but the kind that shrinks in the swimming pool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duff65</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/17/the-point-kurtz-misses-on-sweet-caroline/comment-page-1/#comment-1724944</link>
		<dc:creator>duff65</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=37731#comment-1724944</guid>
		<description>One thing is for sure.  Caroline can&#039;t possibly be any worse (or less qualified) than some that are there now.  The NY senior senator come immediately to mind along with a host of others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing is for sure.  Caroline can&#8217;t possibly be any worse (or less qualified) than some that are there now.  The NY senior senator come immediately to mind along with a host of others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roux</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/17/the-point-kurtz-misses-on-sweet-caroline/comment-page-1/#comment-1724907</link>
		<dc:creator>roux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=37731#comment-1724907</guid>
		<description>But then Paterson is as SNL put it &quot;character out of a Richard Pryor movie&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But then Paterson is as SNL put it &#8220;character out of a Richard Pryor movie&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rokemronnie</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/17/the-point-kurtz-misses-on-sweet-caroline/comment-page-1/#comment-1724883</link>
		<dc:creator>rokemronnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=37731#comment-1724883</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve said it before, since naming people to take their spouses&#039; seats has been done before, like when Jean Carnahan was appointed to the Senate seat that her husband Mel had been elected to posthumously, why not name Bill Clinton? It&#039;s not like he&#039;d be any more liberal than Caroline Kennedy (actually, with his sense of triangulation he&#039;d probably be closer to the center) and he&#039;s actually got a resume, having been elected to be a state AG, a two term governor and POTUS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve said it before, since naming people to take their spouses&#8217; seats has been done before, like when Jean Carnahan was appointed to the Senate seat that her husband Mel had been elected to posthumously, why not name Bill Clinton? It&#8217;s not like he&#8217;d be any more liberal than Caroline Kennedy (actually, with his sense of triangulation he&#8217;d probably be closer to the center) and he&#8217;s actually got a resume, having been elected to be a state AG, a two term governor and POTUS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ButAsForMe! &#187; The point Kurtz misses on Sweet Caroline</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/17/the-point-kurtz-misses-on-sweet-caroline/comment-page-1/#comment-1724869</link>
		<dc:creator>ButAsForMe! &#187; The point Kurtz misses on Sweet Caroline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=37731#comment-1724869</guid>
		<description>[...]  The point Kurtz misses on Sweet Caroline Quick Read: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  The point Kurtz misses on Sweet Caroline Quick Read: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruno Strozek</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/17/the-point-kurtz-misses-on-sweet-caroline/comment-page-1/#comment-1724866</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruno Strozek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=37731#comment-1724866</guid>
		<description>The fear and loathing of Sarah Palin can be directly tied the the dynastic elitists on both sides of the aisle.
In their twisted world it is forbidden for a lowly commoner like Palin to be anywhere near the Ring of Power...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fear and loathing of Sarah Palin can be directly tied the the dynastic elitists on both sides of the aisle.<br />
In their twisted world it is forbidden for a lowly commoner like Palin to be anywhere near the Ring of Power&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whitetop</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/17/the-point-kurtz-misses-on-sweet-caroline/comment-page-1/#comment-1724846</link>
		<dc:creator>whitetop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=37731#comment-1724846</guid>
		<description>As far as Democrat$ are concerned - birthright, notoriety, celebrity...ka-ching, ka-ching, ka-ching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as Democrat$ are concerned &#8211; birthright, notoriety, celebrity&#8230;ka-ching, ka-ching, ka-ching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon1979</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/17/the-point-kurtz-misses-on-sweet-caroline/comment-page-1/#comment-1724834</link>
		<dc:creator>jon1979</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=37731#comment-1724834</guid>
		<description>The problem in New York is, while there are no Republicans of any stature besides Rudy, the Democratic field is chock-full of hackery as well -- Cuomo is the most high-profile name, and the mitigating circumstance for Patterson would be naming him to the Senate would eliminate Andrew as a 2010 primary competitor in an attempt to gain his father&#039;s old seat. But Andrew was also the grand poobah at the Department of Housing and Urban Development under Clinton back in the 1990s, when the draconian laws mandating banks and other lending institutions approve more high-risk mortgages under penalty of federal prosecution was implemented. 

So it&#039;s not like Andy would come charging into Washington demanding Chris Dodd &#039;fess up on his Countrywide loan scandal. And the New York State Legislature and the New York City Council either are full of high-profile Dems too corrupt to pass muster with the voters in an actual statewide election (Sheldon Silver), or they&#039;re angling for an even higher-profile position of NYC mayor next year (Carolyn Maloney might be a compromise Senate pick; but it&#039;s not as if she&#039;s done anything that notable while in Congress the past 14 years, and the only reason she got the seat in the first place was because her husband was one of the victims of the 1993 Long Island Railroad massacre, which puts her only marginally ahead of Caroline Kennedy&#039;s justification for appointment to higher office).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem in New York is, while there are no Republicans of any stature besides Rudy, the Democratic field is chock-full of hackery as well &#8212; Cuomo is the most high-profile name, and the mitigating circumstance for Patterson would be naming him to the Senate would eliminate Andrew as a 2010 primary competitor in an attempt to gain his father&#8217;s old seat. But Andrew was also the grand poobah at the Department of Housing and Urban Development under Clinton back in the 1990s, when the draconian laws mandating banks and other lending institutions approve more high-risk mortgages under penalty of federal prosecution was implemented. </p>
<p>So it&#8217;s not like Andy would come charging into Washington demanding Chris Dodd &#8216;fess up on his Countrywide loan scandal. And the New York State Legislature and the New York City Council either are full of high-profile Dems too corrupt to pass muster with the voters in an actual statewide election (Sheldon Silver), or they&#8217;re angling for an even higher-profile position of NYC mayor next year (Carolyn Maloney might be a compromise Senate pick; but it&#8217;s not as if she&#8217;s done anything that notable while in Congress the past 14 years, and the only reason she got the seat in the first place was because her husband was one of the victims of the 1993 Long Island Railroad massacre, which puts her only marginally ahead of Caroline Kennedy&#8217;s justification for appointment to higher office).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earned NOT Given &#171; Mcnorman&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/17/the-point-kurtz-misses-on-sweet-caroline/comment-page-1/#comment-1724833</link>
		<dc:creator>Earned NOT Given &#171; Mcnorman&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=37731#comment-1724833</guid>
		<description>[...] December 17, 2008 Earned NOT&#160;Given Posted by mcnorman under Uncategorized &#124; Tags: caroline kennedy, Democrat, DNC, dynasty`, Ethics, experience, politics, senate &#124; &#160;  Dynasty? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] December 17, 2008 Earned NOT&nbsp;Given Posted by mcnorman under Uncategorized | Tags: caroline kennedy, Democrat, DNC, dynasty`, Ethics, experience, politics, senate | &nbsp;  Dynasty? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whitetop</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/17/the-point-kurtz-misses-on-sweet-caroline/comment-page-1/#comment-1724827</link>
		<dc:creator>whitetop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=37731#comment-1724827</guid>
		<description>But $$ talks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But $$ talks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D2Boston</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/17/the-point-kurtz-misses-on-sweet-caroline/comment-page-1/#comment-1724816</link>
		<dc:creator>D2Boston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=37731#comment-1724816</guid>
		<description>So Ed, Kurtz&#039;s response to your point would be &quot;She can&#039;t help it if it&#039;s a situation where the person will be appointed; that&#039;s just the way it played out.&quot;  It then begs the question, if Hillary were leaving the seat vacant during an election cycle, would Caroline actually &lt;em&gt;do&lt;/em&gt; the heavy lifting and organize and execute a campaign... I guess we&#039;ll never know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Ed, Kurtz&#8217;s response to your point would be &#8220;She can&#8217;t help it if it&#8217;s a situation where the person will be appointed; that&#8217;s just the way it played out.&#8221;  It then begs the question, if Hillary were leaving the seat vacant during an election cycle, would Caroline actually <em>do</em> the heavy lifting and organize and execute a campaign&#8230; I guess we&#8217;ll never know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: americanpatriot</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/17/the-point-kurtz-misses-on-sweet-caroline/comment-page-1/#comment-1724810</link>
		<dc:creator>americanpatriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=37731#comment-1724810</guid>
		<description>Anyone speaking of self reliance and accountability in this &quot;Gimme&quot; country stands little chance of being elected.  I&#039;d love to see Rudy back in but just don&#039;t think it will happen.  We are fast becoming a banana republic because the &quot;Gimmes&quot; outnumber the self reliant people.  Don&#039;t mean to sounds so negative, but it&#039;s a reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone speaking of self reliance and accountability in this &#8220;Gimme&#8221; country stands little chance of being elected.  I&#8217;d love to see Rudy back in but just don&#8217;t think it will happen.  We are fast becoming a banana republic because the &#8220;Gimmes&#8221; outnumber the self reliant people.  Don&#8217;t mean to sounds so negative, but it&#8217;s a reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Have dynasties taken over Congress?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/17/the-point-kurtz-misses-on-sweet-caroline/comment-page-1/#comment-1724758</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Have dynasties taken over Congress?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=37731#comment-1724758</guid>
		<description>[...] As I wrote earlier, we have had political families in America for as long as we&#8217;ve had America.  Two of our first six presidents were father and son (the Adamses), the Lodges had a seat in the Senate until the Kennedys arrived, and so on.  Voters have always liked brand names, and wealthy families in the US have a tradition of public service that has at least some quality of sacrifice to it, in a noblesse oblige manner. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As I wrote earlier, we have had political families in America for as long as we&#8217;ve had America.  Two of our first six presidents were father and son (the Adamses), the Lodges had a seat in the Senate until the Kennedys arrived, and so on.  Voters have always liked brand names, and wealthy families in the US have a tradition of public service that has at least some quality of sacrifice to it, in a noblesse oblige manner. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigD</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/17/the-point-kurtz-misses-on-sweet-caroline/comment-page-1/#comment-1724755</link>
		<dc:creator>BigD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=37731#comment-1724755</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Howard Kurtz, one of my favorite media analysts,&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Actually the only people who do purposeful media analysis in this country are Rush Limbaugh,James Taranto, a group of bloggers that include Mickey Kaus and Ed Driscoll, and  Kathleen Hall Jamison at the Annenberg School.

Kurtz is a media columnist; that is, he covers the media like an entertainment beat, he certainly doesn&#039;t analyze it in any serious sense of the word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Howard Kurtz, one of my favorite media analysts,</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually the only people who do purposeful media analysis in this country are Rush Limbaugh,James Taranto, a group of bloggers that include Mickey Kaus and Ed Driscoll, and  Kathleen Hall Jamison at the Annenberg School.</p>
<p>Kurtz is a media columnist; that is, he covers the media like an entertainment beat, he certainly doesn&#8217;t analyze it in any serious sense of the word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedSoxNation</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/17/the-point-kurtz-misses-on-sweet-caroline/comment-page-1/#comment-1724747</link>
		<dc:creator>RedSoxNation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=37731#comment-1724747</guid>
		<description>I say put her in.  It will make the seat vunerable in the next election, which I think is 2010.  We will need to find someone strong from New York to go against her.  If only Rudy Guiliani would run.  He would surely win against her.  Isn&#039;t there anyone else from New York who could run against her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say put her in.  It will make the seat vunerable in the next election, which I think is 2010.  We will need to find someone strong from New York to go against her.  If only Rudy Guiliani would run.  He would surely win against her.  Isn&#8217;t there anyone else from New York who could run against her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drjohn</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/17/the-point-kurtz-misses-on-sweet-caroline/comment-page-1/#comment-1724736</link>
		<dc:creator>drjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=37731#comment-1724736</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What do all of the above have in common, and Caroline Kennedy does not?  All of them were elected to their positions.  &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Getting elected is for chumps.

We&#039;re &lt;strong&gt;Kennedy&#039;s!&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What do all of the above have in common, and Caroline Kennedy does not?  All of them were elected to their positions.  </p></blockquote>
<p>Getting elected is for chumps.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re <strong>Kennedy&#8217;s!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff_from_mpls</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/17/the-point-kurtz-misses-on-sweet-caroline/comment-page-1/#comment-1724718</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff_from_mpls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=37731#comment-1724718</guid>
		<description>When a person, or a group of people, live in memories of the past and pathetically try to reenact those events memories by playing it out over and over again in little fantasies like Obama and Caroline Kennedy, don&#039;t we suspect that that person, or that group of people, is mentally ill?

That&#039;s the democrat party with Kennedy.

&lt;strong&gt;Hey libs, your man John F. Kennedy was a conservative hawk, and was killed by a communist named Lee Harvey Oswald.&lt;/strong&gt;

I can&#039;t even imagine the layers and layers of self-deception that liberals must struggle under to get through the day here in reality land.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When a person, or a group of people, live in memories of the past and pathetically try to reenact those events memories by playing it out over and over again in little fantasies like Obama and Caroline Kennedy, don&#8217;t we suspect that that person, or that group of people, is mentally ill?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the democrat party with Kennedy.</p>
<p><strong>Hey libs, your man John F. Kennedy was a conservative hawk, and was killed by a communist named Lee Harvey Oswald.</strong></p>
<p>I can&#8217;t even imagine the layers and layers of self-deception that liberals must struggle under to get through the day here in reality land.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkTheGreat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/17/the-point-kurtz-misses-on-sweet-caroline/comment-page-1/#comment-1724717</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkTheGreat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=37731#comment-1724717</guid>
		<description>“No experience necessary” is now “No experience IS REQUIRED” to be &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A DEMOCRATIC &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;POTUS or a Senator.

Change!

Brat on December 17, 2008 at 9:02 AM


FIFY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“No experience necessary” is now “No experience IS REQUIRED” to be <em><strong>A DEMOCRATIC </strong></em>POTUS or a Senator.</p>
<p>Change!</p>
<p>Brat on December 17, 2008 at 9:02 AM</p>
<p>FIFY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
