Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Sanford: Stop raiding TARP funds for private enterprise

posted at 12:35 pm on December 16, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Mark Sanford continues to add to his conservative credentials.  After penning a refusal to request bailout funds, Sanford has written the White House to add his voice to those opposed to a bailout of Detroit’s automakers. The chair of the Republican Governors Association calls this a tipping point in American economics:

“I believe this would be a very great mistake,” Sanford said in a letter written to the President on Monday. “It would open the floodgates of federal monies for every distressed industry across this country–and there will be many in this economic slowdown.”

“I believe we are at a tipping point in moving from a market-based economy to a politically-based economy, wherein one’s success can be determined not by good decisions and good work, but by the size of one’s voice and connection to Washington,” Sanford wrote. “The real economic stimulus of this country lies in the daily work and effort of millions you have seen across this land.  These bailouts not only represent an enormous cost they are left to carry, but a shattering of the rights and responsibilities that have historically been linked to achieving the American Dream.”

Sanford hits the nail on the head.  The American government does not have a mandate to select winners and losers in the market, apart from buying products for its own use from the private sector.  People on the Left talk about crony capitalism, but this is nothing less than crony socialism — the government subsidy of selected private enterprise, based solely on their political impact.

Even as “investments”, as bailout advocates describe the package, the loans make no sense at all.  None of the automakers have a problem selling cars; they have a problem showing a profit.  Why would any lender, private or public, invest in that failing model, let alone lend money on its basis?  They can’t pay back loans when they lose money on their car sales, and nothing that management and labor have yet produced shows any serious attempt to solve that problem.  This is exactly what Chapter 11 bankruptcy exists to resolve.

The first time I heard Sanford speak, I wondered why he hadn’t thrown his hat into the ring in the 2008 presidential sweepstakes.  His leadership on limited government and refusal to throw away money we don’t have should put Sanford in the first rank of candidates for national leadership in 2012, if we’re bright enough to recognize it.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

If it’s still legal, Sanford will be President someday.

JiangxiDad on December 16, 2008 at 12:37 PM

His leadership on limited government and refusal to throw away money we don’t have should put Sanford in the first rank of candidates for national leadership in 2012, if we’re bright enough to recognize it.

Romney Sanford 2012?

Theworldisnotenough on December 16, 2008 at 12:43 PM

Where’s Ron Paul when we need him?

Will anyone challange the Constitutionality of all these bailouts?

These crooks in the White House and Congress need to be jailed ASAP.

roninacreage on December 16, 2008 at 12:45 PM

Mark Sanford is making sense.

btw, to the Romney/Sanford poster above–haven’t you noticed that Mitt is all for government intervention to save the Shrinking 3? He’s no conservative, he’s just another Big Gov’t Republican. NO thanks!

james23 on December 16, 2008 at 12:45 PM

Sanford at the TOP of the ticket and whoever else at the bottom ‘12!
:-)

/had been my veep pick all along, John didn’t see things that way …

Buckaroo on December 16, 2008 at 12:46 PM

Is the bailout money considered taxable income to those who recieve it?

roninacreage on December 16, 2008 at 12:46 PM

Sanford – Palin 2012. Experience, actual records, small government, clean backgrounds, and no dynasties.

rbj on December 16, 2008 at 12:48 PM

Sanford / Palin 2012

Mark Garnett on December 16, 2008 at 12:50 PM

“rbj on December 16, 2008 at 12:48 PM”

heh — tho the Sanford boyz and Palin women might start new dynasties someday!
:-)

Buckaroo on December 16, 2008 at 12:50 PM

This is exactly what Chapter 11 bankruptcy exists to resolve.

If ALL the ‘talking-heads’ are supposed to be as smart and bright as they would like everyone to believe, then why the hell don’t any of them talk about Chapter 11, instead of Chapter 7????

The ‘talking-heads’ appear to have a symbiotic attachment to the socialist liberal agenda.

belad on December 16, 2008 at 12:51 PM

james23 on December 16, 2008 at 12:45 PM

To quote Dana Carvey’s take on John McLaughlin: “WRONG!”

How can one claim with a straight face that Romney is “all for government intervention to save the Shrinking 3,” when he published an NYT op-ed piece on Nov. 19 titled “Let Detroit Go Bankrupt”?

OneVision on December 16, 2008 at 12:55 PM

Sanford for POTUS 2012 – FTW!

Draft Sanford 2012

Mr. Sanford went to Washington

Rae on December 16, 2008 at 12:55 PM

“OneVision on December 16, 2008 at 12:55 PM”

mitt supported the bank bailout and he was among those who could have been named “car czar” and iirc we was for the corker plan …

/but, y’know, feel free to continue yer mitt worship anywho …

Buckaroo on December 16, 2008 at 12:57 PM

btw, SC is growing economically due to their switchover from textiles to high-tech. manufacturing — but surely that didn’t come about solely by private $, right?

/not to diss Mark here, but I’m jus’ sayin’ …

Buckaroo on December 16, 2008 at 12:59 PM

There’s a Volvo-driving-hippie-libtard down the street from me. The tailgate of his car is coated out in leftist stickers. One reads: “END CORPORATE WELFARE!”

He’s finally correct on something for the first time in his life.

innominatus on December 16, 2008 at 1:01 PM

As a South Carolina resident I would love to see Sanford run for POTUS! I have to say though, the selfish side of me wants to keep him here. Maybe good governors are like birds… If you love them sometimes you have to let them go.

Capatilist Pig on December 16, 2008 at 1:12 PM

Sanford/Jindal 2012

Harpoon on December 16, 2008 at 1:18 PM

“The preamble to the Constitution states We, the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare… It doesn’t say guarantee the general welfare. And it certainly doesn’t say give welfare benefits to all the people in the country who aren’t doing so well even if the reason they aren’t doing so well is because they’re sitting on their butts in front of the TV.”

P. J. O’Rourke

DL13 on December 16, 2008 at 1:25 PM

OneVision on December 16, 2008 at 12:55 PM

Didn’t he walk that all the way back later? I don’t have a link, but I thought he had second thoughts after the article.

a capella on December 16, 2008 at 1:25 PM

I’m a broken record about Mark Sanford. As I posted this morning in another topic, he gets it. I look at the future of the GOP and if he’s allowed to take a leading role, they’ll be fine.

LastRick on December 16, 2008 at 1:26 PM

Sanford for POTUS 2012 – FTW!

Draft Sanford 2012

Rae on December 16, 2008 at 12:55 PM

Great stuff! Thanks for posting, Rae.

The video in this link is classic. Rangel and Levin are left looking like the complete fools that they are.

Sanford is definitely a name to watch in the consevative movement.

UltimateBob on December 16, 2008 at 1:30 PM

I do not get many chances to say I love South Carolina, but Sanford continues to find ways to help me say it. I was a little concerned when I heard that he didn’t want to run for president, but I think he meant he was not ready to run at that time. Unless there is an Ayers or Wright in his background somewhere, he only has to fight Sarah to get my vote.

Doctor B on December 16, 2008 at 1:39 PM

Buckaroo on December 16, 2008 at 12:57 PM

Your post fails to provide specificity. You suggest that Romney may have been named “car czar” but you fail to pinpoint any source indicating that Romney himself would have even considered taking such a position.

I don’t “worship” any candidate, but I like what I have seen so far from Romney, Palin, Sanford, and Jindal. I do believe in defending them from attacks such as yours that have every indication of lacking a basis in fact.

OneVision on December 16, 2008 at 1:40 PM

Sanford for POTUS 2012 – FTW!

Draft Sanford 2012

Rae on December 16, 2008 at 12:55 PM

Great stuff! Thanks for posting, Rae.

The video in this link is classic.

Yes it is. This video needs to be shown again and again. Sanford absolutely dumbfounds them, they can not understand why he doesn’t want the bailout money. Or they do understand and decide to talk over him instead (until the representative from Georgia helps out) — Rangel is figuratively fingers-in-ears la-la-la I can’t hear you.

LastRick on December 16, 2008 at 1:42 PM

Sanford is definitely a name to watch in the conservative movement.

He’s really getting his name out there, isn’t he? From where I sit, it looks like he’s actively going for it and the campaign has started.

And thanks for the props, UltimateBob! A telling few moments:

Sanford: It’s always easy to spend somebody else’s money.

Levin: It’s somebody else’s money?

Sanford: Whose is it?

It just kills me that Democrats see our earnings as their money, and whatever they allow us to keep is from the goodness of their (tiny, black) hearts, or something.

Rae on December 16, 2008 at 1:43 PM

Sanford could’ve ran this year and defeated all the wannabe’s we had in the GOP field. Hopefully he’s interested in the presidency in 2012, because he’s what we need. An actual limited government conservative who walks the walk.

therightwinger on December 16, 2008 at 1:58 PM

Rae on December 16, 2008 at 12:55 PM

Another “thank you” … I enjoyed the video and signed up.

ORrighty on December 16, 2008 at 2:12 PM

I signed up on the link above to ask Mark to run in 2012 with Palin as his VP choice. True Conservatives, walking the walk, preaching and teaching the stark, bold differences in Liberal radicals and American loving Conservatives… Now the idiot “moderates” and “independants” will have to make real clear, black and white,(no pun), choices…

Besides a guy named Mark is a good thing for all concerned.

Signed, Mark Garnett

Mark Garnett on December 16, 2008 at 2:17 PM

If the “bailout” gets the UAW to make large concessions, it will be good for the country and GM (and Chrysler) can be profitable again. If not, then you’re right, Ed.

njcommuter on December 16, 2008 at 2:32 PM

Where’s Ron Paul when we need him?

roninacreage on December 16, 2008 at 12:45 PM

Attending the American Nazi Party’s White Christmas Party.

grdred944 on December 16, 2008 at 2:54 PM

I do not get many chances to say I love South Carolina, but Sanford continues to find ways to help me say it. I was a little concerned when I heard that he didn’t want to run for president, but I think he meant he was not ready to run at that time. Unless there is an Ayers or Wright in his background somewhere, he only has to fight Sarah to get my vote.

SC has Sanford and DeMint and damn proud of it. But as long as we have people that have a problem with SC for whatever reason they might have a battle. ‘Hey, they kept a Confed battle flag on state house grounds’, ‘they had segregation’… blah blah blah.

GunnyRet03 on December 16, 2008 at 3:19 PM

And thanks for the props, UltimateBob!

Rae on December 16, 2008 at 1:43 PM

My pleasure. The more I see/hear of Rangel, the more I despise the man. He reminds me of a used car salesman: slicked-back hair, waxed moustache, raspy voice. The only thing missing is the multicolored plaid Polyester pants.

Same goes for Frank, Dodd, Pelosi and Harry “shoe-bomber” Reid. Who on earth keeps voting for these crooked shysters?

UltimateBob on December 16, 2008 at 3:23 PM

I had the good fortune to be at a Conservative political dinner in October, 2007, where Gov. Sanford was the featured speaker.

Got to briefly meet him and shake his hand and encourage him to run for President.

VERY impressive guy (and resume).

Bumper sticker: “Governors make much better Presidents than Senators.”

After all, it is the most important EXECUTIVE job in the world, not the most important DEBATING and COMPROMISING job.

fred5678 on December 16, 2008 at 3:25 PM

Rangel is figuratively fingers-in-ears la-la-la I can’t hear you.

LastRick on December 16, 2008 at 1:42 PM

Politicians like Rangel just love to be the ones doing all the talking. They only want to be heard asking questions, they don’t give a crap about the answer. Just watch any senate hearing. You’ll get all kinds of grandstanding, and occasionally hear some memorable quotes (like Hillary’s “willing suspension of disbelief”) but very little reasoned, meaningful debate.

UltimateBob on December 16, 2008 at 3:30 PM

Yeah Yeah Yeah. Last time I looked the taxpayer pay Sanford’s wages too. I understand how people feel, but I would just as soon see some of that money go to taxpayers with families as I would see it go anywhere else. And where were all these people a year ago? Cavuto, Sanford…all of them? They were no help.

No, they say, we should just turn it over to the private sector to police itself. That would be the same private sector that produced the billionare Nasdaq baron robber. Please.

Terrye on December 16, 2008 at 6:13 PM

Gov. Sanford may be a nice guy and a solid conservative, but like most Southern politicians he prefers to avoid the truth: The entire South is one huge welfare recipient of funds taken by the feds from the West coast, Industrial Midwest and Northeast. Over the last 30 years it amounts to trillions of dollars.

http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/22685.html

Sanford was on blowhard Mike Galagher’s show (Hey Mike, so your wife died, get over it) and Sanford was going on how it isn’t fair to make South Carolina taxpayers subsidize California firefighters’ pensions. California gets $0.78 in federal spending for every tax dollar it sends to Washington. South Carolina gets $1.35. So it’s California residents who are subsidizing South Carolina, not the other way around.

Most of the defense plants in California have closed or been relocated to the South.

All of the states in the South and Southwest, except for Texas ($0.90), North Carolina ($0.97) and Georgia ($0.99) get more in federal spending than they pay in tax dollars.

rokemronnie on December 16, 2008 at 10:32 PM

Big Three Bailout – Give Me a Break (Video) (5min) (John Stossel, 20/20)

Poptech on December 17, 2008 at 12:26 AM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.