Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


One cheer for the Chicago Tribune for not blowing the Blago probe

posted at 9:42 am on December 10, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Share on Facebook | regular view

The Chicago Tribune reports today that it had the story on Governor Rod Blagojevich’s full spectrum of corruption but held off on reporting key elements at the request of US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald.  Fitzgerald wanted to keep certain aspects of the investigation secret to allow Blagojevich to hang himself, and the Tribune responded with civic responsibility and coordinated its publication of those elements with Fitzgerald’s office.  However, their self-congratulatory report leaves out a certain amount of motivation:

As the federal probe into Gov. Rod Blagojevich intensified in recent weeks, editors and reporters at the Chicago Tribune balanced a competitive story with a rare request from U.S. Atty. Patrick Fitzgerald’s office: To hold off on what they uncovered until a key phase in the investigation could be carried out. …

Since October, the Tribune has broken several stories on the Blagojevich probe, but in some cases withheld information because of the government’s request. …

“We thought we’d never have the opportunity to install the bug or place the telephone tap and we made an urgent request for the Tribune not to publish that story,” Fitzgerald said. “That is a very rare thing for us to do and it’s an even rarer thing for a newspaper to grant.

“I have to take my hat off that the Tribune withheld that story for a substantial period of time, which otherwise might have compromised the investigation from ever happening,” he said.

The Tribune does deserve credit for exercising editorial restraint.  We certainly haven’t seen that from the New York Times, for instance, which took delight in exposing a series of secret counterterrorist operations over the last few years, rendering them all but useless.  Withholding this information certainly kept Blagojevich from feeling concerned about his telephone conversations, as the transcriptions proved.

But let’s not pretend that civic pride provided the only motivation for the Tribune Company in this case:

Angry over critical editorials, Gov. Rod Blagojevich threatened to withhold state money for Wrigley Field renovations unless members of the Chicago Tribune’s editorial board were fired, authorities charged Tuesday.

A series of secretly recorded telephone calls showed Blagojevich maneuvering behind the scenes in recent weeks to pressure Tribune Co., which owns both the ballpark and the newspaper, according to court records.

In one recorded conversation, Blagojevich uttered a series of profanities about the paper’s editorial writers, saying that “our recommendation is fire all those [expletive] people, get ‘em the [expletive] out of there and get us some editorial support.”

In another call, the governor’s wife, Patricia, allegedly can be heard yelling in the background and urging her husband to “hold up that [expletive] Cubs [expletive].”

The Tribune had a particular animus for Blagojevich after this ham-handed attempt to bully their editorial board.  They wanted him gone, and they wouldn’t have minded losing a scoop or two to the competition to get it.  The Tribune had bigger fish to fry: millions of dollars in taxpayer funding for Wrigley Field renovations, which are now all but guaranteed after Blagojevich’s extortion attempts got exposed by Fitzgerald.

So yes, one cheer for the Tribune’s exercise of editorial responsibility.  Too bad that taxpayers will pay for it.

Update: Rick Moran writes at The American Thinker that tax money may have had Zell ready to dance to Blagojevich’s tune:

But the sale of Wrigley field will involve massive taxes — something on the order of $100 million dollars in capital gains. Zell had a approached the Illinois Finance Authority (IFA) in order to strike a deal where, according to the criminal complaint, the IFA would take title to Wrigley Field thus saving Zell a lot of cash.

Enter Blagojevich, who told his chief of staff John Harris (also arrested today) to make it clear to Zell that no help from the IFA would be forthcoming unless some members of the Chicago Tribune editorial board were fired.

In a November 4 phone call with Harris, Blagojevich told his aide “”our recommendation is fire all those [expletive] people, get ‘em the [expletive] out of there and get us some editorial support.”

Harris reported back on November 11 that Zell “got the message and is very sensitive to the issue.” Later, Harris told Blagojevich that there were “certain corporate reorganizations and budget cuts coming and, reading between the lines, he’s (Zell) going after that section.”

No firings have taken place yet and it is doubtful that Zell will make a move now that this deal is in the open. I suppose he saw it as a cost of doing business and $100 million is a lot of cash. But the thought that he would buckle to the whims of this strutting peacock of a politician who wanted journalists, who were only doing the job they were being paid to do, axed because they were telling the truth about his corruption stinks of rank cowardice.

That makes “civic responsibility” an even more palatable option, doesn’t it?


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

Journalistic integrity as a Public Relations stunt.

Good times!

jeff_from_mpls on December 10, 2008 at 9:46 AM

Huh?

on the morning of December 5, the Chicago Tribune ran a story on its front page reporting that law enforcement had secretly recorded Blagojevich’s conversations as part of a criminal investigation.

The Tribune blew the whole deal.

faraway on December 10, 2008 at 9:48 AM

A newspaper makes an editorial decision that helps Obama get elected. Now that’s news.

snaggletoothie on December 10, 2008 at 9:49 AM

That makes “civic responsibility” an even more palatable option, doesn’t it?

For someone who shows much animus toward “truthers” you’re sure fond of throwing out “conspiracy theories” — especially about the media — without a thread of evidence. Merely speculation.

Tom_Shipley on December 10, 2008 at 9:49 AM

Blago should have converted to Islam and started planting bombs. Then the Tribune would have blown the whistle on the investigation.

rbj on December 10, 2008 at 9:50 AM

That makes “civic responsibility” an even more palatable option, doesn’t it?

For someone who shows much animus toward “truthers” you’re sure fond of throwing out “conspiracy theories” — especially about the media — without a thread of evidence. Merely speculation.

Tom_Shipley on December 10, 2008 at 9:49 AM

Do you even think about what you write? This makes no sense whatsoever.

What do I expect from an idiot troll.

loudmouth883 on December 10, 2008 at 9:53 AM

Blago should have converted to Islam and started planting bombs. Then the Tribune would have blown the whistle on the investigation.

rbj on December 10, 2008 at 9:50 AM

In Chicago terrorist circles, they call it “vandalism.”

So I hear.

jeff_from_mpls on December 10, 2008 at 9:56 AM

You’re forgetting the most obvious reason for the Trib to cooperate in the investigation back in October, a reason even more obvious than to avoid costing the Tribune money: get Obama elected. The last thing Obama would have wanted were damaging stories about Blagojevich running in a major newspaper a few weeks before the election. Even if the stories didn’t implicate Obama in wrongdoing, it would simply serve to highlight all the graft and corruption in his hometown.

Still, I find it hilarious that the Tribune guy was actually willing to fire editorialists who dared to criticize Blagojevich. Obama will pull the same stunts, of course, but he’ll just be more quiet about it.

Outlander on December 10, 2008 at 9:57 AM

Obama will pull the same stunts, of course, but he’ll just be more quiet about it.

Outlander on December 10, 2008 at 9:57 AM

Agreed. I do not think The One will tolerate public dissent, no matter how partiotic.

loudmouth883 on December 10, 2008 at 10:00 AM

Poor Zell Miller. A turnaround artist finds himself deep in doo-doo first over the LA Times not releasing the Khalidi tape, and now this. Message to moguls: Stay away from media companies. They’re poisonous.

JiangxiDad on December 10, 2008 at 10:01 AM

Except that if you look at the timeline of events, when the Tribune published their December 4 story on Blago being wiretapped, he nixed the planned deal on the Senate seat and started setting up his legal defense fund. The Tribune tipped him off and scuttled the planned meeting between Blago and Candidate Five, and caused the feds to initiate the arrest.

The Tribune deserves blame here, not a pat on the back. They screwed up what could have been ever more ironclad evidence on this deal.

Tabris on December 10, 2008 at 10:04 AM

That makes “civic responsibility” an even more palatable option, doesn’t it?

For someone who shows much animus toward “truthers” you’re sure fond of throwing out “conspiracy theories” — especially about the media — without a thread of evidence. Merely speculation.

Tom_Shipley on December 10, 2008 at 9:49 AM

Chill Tom. You won. What’s all the excitement about? Did you think we were going to like him? When you feel compelled to comment about criticism of the new President, kindly remember Bush, and let your essential decency act as your brake.

JiangxiDad on December 10, 2008 at 10:05 AM

loudmouth883 on December 10, 2008 at 9:53 AM

Let me explain for those who are slow on the uptake.

Ed is charging (well, as is his wont, insinuating) the owner of the Tribune company exerted some sort of pressure on the editorial staff not to run a story for the financial benefit of the paper.

It just so happens that the Feds asked the Trib to do the same, so not only do they get what they wanted, but they get to look good in the process (even though their motivations were fiscal, not civic-minded).

The fact is that Ed has no evidence that the decision to not run more of what the Trib had on Blogo went beyond the editorial office. And, since there was such animosity between the Trib and Blogojevich, it was actually probably hard for them to sit on what they had and not be the ones to take down the mayor — but that is just speculation on my part.

The known facts are: the trib had stuff on blogojevich. The feds asked them to sit on it. they did.

Ed, being bias against the media, is able to spin it so that the Trib was doing so not out of civic responsibility, but because it would clear the way for money for Wrigley renovations. The editorial staff would not be acting with this in mind. A directive would have been given from higher up to sit on the story to make it easier to get rid of Blogojevich. There’s no evidence of that, yet Ed states his conclusion almost as if it’s fact:

But let’s not pretend that civic pride provided the only motivation for the Tribune Company in this case:

So yes, one cheer for the Tribune’s exercise of editorial responsibility. Too bad that taxpayers will pay for it.

He’s spun a narrative that yes, the news media did the right thing, but only because there’s money in it for them. Yet, there’s no evidence that money was actually motivation for sitting on the story. It’s merely a conspiracy theory on Ed’s part. And you guys are all to eager to swallow it.

Tom_Shipley on December 10, 2008 at 10:07 AM

Civics, u r doin’ it rong.

kirkill on December 10, 2008 at 10:07 AM

JiangxiDad on December 10, 2008 at 10:05 AM

I don’t mind criticism, as long as it’s fair. this is not fair criticism. And we’re not talking about Obama here, we’re talking about the Tribune.

Tom_Shipley on December 10, 2008 at 10:08 AM

Journalistic integrity? Too bad they looked the other way for decades while corruption was rampant in Chicago. Under their watch, politicians commited crimes that were standard operating procedures for the most corrupt political system in the country. They just stifled an out of control hood before he exposed other cronies that were just as criminal. The Tribune is a tool of political corruption. This is nothing less. Time for them to disappear from the public scene.

volsense on December 10, 2008 at 10:17 AM

And you guys are all to eager to swallow it.

Tom_Shipley on December 10, 2008 at 10:07 AM

I think that is true. But actually it’s more a criticism of Miller and his buy-out buddies than a reflection of something essentially liberally biased about the Tribune.

As for making value judgments in regard to motive (or anything else for that matter0, I find that Republicans and Conservatives tend to do that with much less reservations than liberals, who find the notion repellent. Personally, I see it as a sign of wisdom.

JiangxiDad on December 10, 2008 at 10:18 AM

The Tribune blew the whole deal.

They ran the story less than week ago when they’ve had if for two months. It seems, given Fitzgerald’s praise (”I have to take my hat off that the Tribune withheld that story for a substantial period of time, which otherwise might have compromised the investigation from ever happening,”), that they were OK with the story running last Friday (or, they at least could live with it).

Tom_Shipley on December 10, 2008 at 10:19 AM

Byron York sees things a little differently

The dealing seemed very close to a climax — and an explosive political scandal. And then, on the morning of December 5, the Chicago Tribune ran a story on its front page reporting that law enforcement had secretly recorded Blagojevich’s conversations as part of a criminal investigation. Blagojevich immediately instructed Fundraiser A to “undo” the plan to meet personally with the associate of Candidate Five. Blagojevich instead turned his energy to preparing his legal defense.

The deal was off, blown, apparently, by the Tribune’s report. For anyone who has watched the case, the astonishing thing is that Blagojevich, prior to December 5, could possibly have assumed that he wasn’t under surveillance. But he apparently did, making for some of the juiciest political wiretaps in years. And he appeared to be moving toward actually making a corrupt deal to sell Obama’s Senate seat when he finally, belatedly, figured things out. And that seems to be the best explanation for why prosecutor Fitzgerald went public on December 9, instead of letting the case continue for a while longer.

patrick neid on December 10, 2008 at 10:23 AM

I am anticipating a LOT of kudos to the paper wrapped around the machine in the near future.

With what I have seen and can post here from their own pages, I would NOT put it an inch past the Trib to warn The One so he stayed clean.

NO I HAVE NO PROOF.

I am citing his as a critique of their coverage of The One and I am sure that their alienation of Blago was more like a fratricidal tiff than a fight to clean up state government.

Just look hard at the city and county they hail from. Political cesspool.

IlikedAUH2O on December 10, 2008 at 10:24 AM

I’ll be waiting with baited breath for a story from the New York Times claiming that they have been extorted for the better part of eight years: “NYT’S JOURNALIST CLAIM BIAS RESULT OF EXTORTION”—KELLER: “PAY TO PLAY” RESTRICTED OUR ABILITY TO PRINT THE TRUTH—CNN/SADDAM HUSSEIN SYNDROME CITED”

Rovin on December 10, 2008 at 10:24 AM

More importantly, which bum-bandits didn’t show up for work?

LimeyGeek on December 10, 2008 at 10:26 AM

But actually it’s more a criticism of Miller and his buy-out buddies than a reflection of something essentially liberally biased about the Tribune.

It’s actually not. Because the people who sat on the story were not Zell and Co., but the Tribune editorial staff.

By insinuating that money was the motive on squelching the story, Ed is charging that either A) the editorial staff gave greater weight to the Tribune companies public interest than reporting the news or B) that Miller put some sort of pressure on the staff to sit on the story.

I doubt the editorial staff was thinking about getting money for Wrigley Field from the state when making this decision. That just doesn’t seem logical to me.

So, it’s more likely he’s charging that Miller put some sort of pressure on the Trib to sit on the story so they could get rid of Blogojevich. But there’s simply zero evidence of that.

The bottom line is that the Tribune did something Ed has long thought newspapers should do — cooperate with law-enforcement in an ongoing investigation. Instead just applauding that, he has to bake up this theory that there motivation wasn’t “pure”, but motivated by money. It’s a nice little back-handed compliment. He says the Trib did the right thing, but for the wrong reasons — which fits with his media bashing storyline.

Tom_Shipley on December 10, 2008 at 10:26 AM

Odds are even without the story the Trib ran on Friday that Fitzgerald would have been coming out with the indictments fairly quickly, as to not drop this pile of crap right in the middle of January’s Obamapalooza in Washington, or after the fact, when a fixed Senate appointment may have already been announced and the aftermath would have been even more chaotic.

jon1979 on December 10, 2008 at 10:27 AM

Tom,

The Tribune published a story saying the Governor was under wiretap. How can you or anyone else justify this?

faraway on December 10, 2008 at 10:29 AM

Why do Baseball owners need taxpayer money for modifications to their stadiums anyway? Take some from the players salaries or shut it down. That really ticks me off.

Sloan Morganstern on December 10, 2008 at 10:29 AM

If the FBI approved the Tribune story, the arrest would have been made with hours of the leak.

faraway on December 10, 2008 at 10:30 AM

By insinuating that money was the motive on squelching the story, Ed is charging that either A) the editorial staff gave greater weight to the Tribune companies public interest than reporting the news or B) that Miller put some sort of pressure on the staff to sit on the story.

I doubt the editorial staff was thinking about getting money for Wrigley Field from the state when making this decision. That just doesn’t seem logical to me.

You might be right. I don’t know. But I suspect that several motives were at play, and the story could have played out in several ways.

As for your guess that money was not likely a motivator in the decision making process, I’ll let that stand on it’s own.

JiangxiDad on December 10, 2008 at 10:32 AM

patrick neid, volsense and Tabris have it.

BTW I don’t buy into complex conspiracies that require the accused to prove a negative with numerous explanations and a tremendous body of evidence. I don’t think most of the birthers here are nuts. I learn here.

Back to work!

IlikedAUH2O on December 10, 2008 at 10:32 AM

It is all friends and friends of friends. I wonder how many dominos The One is thinking about, worrying about?

The name Suzan McDougal comes to mind. Dems still say she was held by the religious right.

IlikedAUH2O on December 10, 2008 at 10:37 AM

Odds are even without the story the Trib ran on Friday that Fitzgerald would have been coming out with the indictments fairly quickly, as to not drop this pile of crap right in the middle of January’s Obamapalooza in Washington, or after the fact, when a fixed Senate appointment may have already been announced and the aftermath would have been even more chaotic.

jon1979 on December 10, 2008 at 10:27 AM

I’m going to give Fitzpatrick credit on this one. Although I have been considered by some of his zeal over certain cases, he’s known here in Chicago for being a nonpartisan and prosecutes both Democrats and Republicans with equal vigor. It seems that the reason why he moved was because of the deal with Senate Candidate #5 (Jesse Jackson Jr. is the current speculation in Chicago) was going forward and Blago. was going to make the appointment in the next few days. It would have looked awful if Fitzgerald had known the information, but have gone ahead and let Blago. basically sell the Senate seat. There is a case to be made that they could get both Blago. and Senate candidate #5, but this scheme was just so blatantly corrupt that Fitzgerald couldn’t allow it to go forward.

In all likelihood, there will be other indictments handed down. It seems that Blago’s wife, Patti, knew about the schemes and was involved in them and it wouldn’t surprise me if she gets in some legal trouble. Fitzgerald could use his wife to squeeze Blago. for information on other members of the Combine. Fitzgerald would really like to get the kingpin of Chicago corruption, Mayor Daley, and Blago. might finally lead him to it. Senate Candidate #5 also might find himself in legal trouble, and at the very least, his political career is probably over.

Illinidiva on December 10, 2008 at 10:38 AM

The Tribune published a story saying the Governor was under wiretap. How can you or anyone else justify this?

I don’t know, ask Fitzgerald.

Tom_Shipley on December 10, 2008 at 10:39 AM

Why do Baseball owners need taxpayer money for modifications to their stadiums anyway? Take some from the players salaries or shut it down. That really ticks me off.

Sloan Morganstern on December 10, 2008 at 10:29 AM

The issue with Wrigley Field is that it is a historical landmark. There is no way that someone would build a baseball stadium basically in the middle of the stadium nowadays. If a new owner had his way, the stadium would probably be torn down and the Cubs would be playing in Schaumburg. Thankfully, this is impossible due to preservation laws.

Illinidiva on December 10, 2008 at 10:41 AM

Senate Candidate #5 also might find himself in legal trouble, and at the very least, his political career is probably over.

Illinidiva on December 10, 2008 at 10:38 AM

If he’s who you say, I doubt his political career is over. Getting on the wrong side of the law to beat the Man is a resume enhancer.

JiangxiDad on December 10, 2008 at 10:43 AM

Candidate 5 is just building street cred

faraway on December 10, 2008 at 10:44 AM

As for your guess that money was not likely a motivator in the decision making process, I’ll let that stand on it’s own.

I just look at the situation as it likely was. Fitzgerald said the Tribune called his office asking about the wire taps. At this point, he asked them to withhold certain aspects of the story. Which, he says, they did.

So, it seems as if the Tribune was ready to go ahead with the story until Fitzgerald’s office asked them not to.

Going by what we know — what’s been reported on the Tribune withholding the story — it seems as simple as that.

As far as withholding the story goes, there’s no evidence that money played a role. I mean, if anything, they’re probably thinking they’ll losing money by not “breaking”
the story. With the industry in such a mess, a story like this would be sell them a lot of papers.

But, going on Ed’s theory that they withheld it so Blogojevich would be more likely be prosecuted, clearing the way for money for Wrigley renovations… i mean, knowing what they did two months ago, I’m pretty sure the Trib staff knew Blogojevich’s days were numbered, whenever this came out.

The bottom line is that there’s just very little merit to Ed’s claim (or insinuation) that money — not civic duty — was the motivation for withholding the story. And — to other’s points on here — if that were the case, why didn’t they wait until the Feds arrested the governor to run the story they ran last Friday?

Tom_Shipley on December 10, 2008 at 10:46 AM

Instead just applauding that, he has to bake up this theory that there (sic) motivation wasn’t “pure”, but motivated by money. It’s a nice little back-handed compliment.

Tom_Shipley on December 10, 2008 at 10:26 AM

It doesn’t seem like anything was “baked up.”

In another call, the governor’s wife, Patricia, allegedly can be heard yelling in the background and urging her husband to “hold up that [expletive] Cubs [expletive].”

Zell struck a deal with Blago that would let him save millions by cheating his taxes. He found out Blago was being wiretapped, and he published the news.

chunderroad on December 10, 2008 at 10:47 AM

Zell struck a deal with Blago that would let him save millions by cheating his taxes. He found out Blago was being wiretapped, and he published the news.

Thanks for playing, but Ed’s actually making the opposite claim.

Tom_Shipley on December 10, 2008 at 10:49 AM

If he’s who you say, I doubt his political career is over. Getting on the wrong side of the law to beat the Man is a resume enhancer.

JiangxiDad on December 10, 2008 at 10:43 AM

He’ll probably get to keep his House seat, but I think that any aspirations for higher office (i.e. the IL Senate seat) are probably off the table. Jackson, like his daddy, also enjoys hearing himself talk. He’s all over the radio, and even John and Sisco, the local conservative guys, have him penciled in weekly because he’s a good interview. Those sorts of interviews would likely go away.

Illinidiva on December 10, 2008 at 10:50 AM

Gasp, cough, cough — goes the mostly dead parrot.

tarpon on December 10, 2008 at 10:52 AM

Breitbart.Com News
• One cheer for the Chicago Tribune for not blowing the Blago probe……1 hour ago (Vent)

At least the got the link right Ed.

Rovin on December 10, 2008 at 10:55 AM

none of you may have guessed this, but last night, olberman’s “Worst Person In The World” segment featured…..

bill o’reilly

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/12/10/keith-olbermann-hits-cons_n_149855.html

eh on December 10, 2008 at 11:02 AM

With all the money that Sports players get. Why the hell should we pay for a stadium? That is crap too. So, the Trib. keeps lips closed on the Gov. So they could nail his butt. But, they kept on and on during the One’s campaign. Not like they really did a favor. But, at least they held off so that monkey could be arrested. Blago better hope that all involved stays healthy too. I have many friends that moved here from Chicago. Most of them are wonderful people. Most of them miss Chicago. But they don’t miss the corruption. I have a feeling that the One knew somehow that the Gov. was being investigated. So, he backed off for his own skin.

sheebe on December 10, 2008 at 11:29 AM

Blago will be duly crucified… not for being a crook, but for threatening the jobs of some left-wing newspaper editorial writers and threatening the template of the Most Holey One.

either orr on December 10, 2008 at 11:32 AM

um ed….

I think you need to read this…

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NzhiYmFlMDZiNzkxYmZlMThmMTZjNDJlYzYwM2ZhNjY=

Diogenes of Sinope on December 10, 2008 at 12:03 PM

It is painfully obvious here that the Tribune served as intermediary between the Feds and The Black Caesar. They agreed to sit on the story and in return the feds kept them in the loop as to what was going on. Rahm found out who Candidate 1 was and who Candidate 5 was.

They got Candidate 1 out of harms way and now she is going to be working in the White House. Candidate 5 (J.J.Jr. – hey hey hey) is now f’ed and if Obama wants to punish Jesse Sr for his disloyalty during the campaign, he will give the green light to go after the kid. Not Jesse Sr’s bastard kid who is too young to go to a federal prison but the one who is actually Candidate 5.

grdred944 on December 10, 2008 at 12:26 PM

Poor Zell Miller. A turnaround artist finds himself deep in doo-doo first over the LA Times not releasing the Khalidi tape, and now this. Message to moguls: Stay away from media companies. They’re poisonous.

JiangxiDad

What does any of this have to do with Zell Miller?

firepilot on December 10, 2008 at 12:36 PM

“hold up that [expletive] Cubs [expletive].”

Blago’s wife is a fiesty one, huh? Loser.

nottakingsides on December 10, 2008 at 1:16 PM

Why do Baseball owners need taxpayer money for modifications to their stadiums anyway? Take some from the players salaries or shut it down. That really ticks me off.

Sloan Morganstern on December 10, 2008 at 10:29 AM

They’re too “big to fail”!

nottakingsides on December 10, 2008 at 1:16 PM

Allow me to speak as an Illinois native…

First, the Tribune’s standing up to a 4% approval rating Governor shows no more bravery. It does not change their liberal bias any more than my opposition to former Illinois Republican Governor George Ryan changes my conservative bias.

Second, it’s been well documented (in my blog) that the Chicago Tribune has not just been in the tank for Obama, but they were the very ones who built the tank. Considering the Tribune had advanced knowledge of the investigation, I would be shocked if I found out they did not tip off the Obama campaign and warned him to distance him from Blagojevich.

ynot4tony2 on December 10, 2008 at 5:42 PM

Thanks for playing, but Ed’s actually making the opposite claim.

Tom_Shipley on December 10, 2008 at 10:49 AM

Sure, Tom. There’s a complicated and irrational explanation for everything. Ed was totally out of line for questioning the integrity of a tax-cheating newspaper owner.

chunderroad on December 10, 2008 at 7:39 PM

Poor Zell Miller. A turnaround artist finds himself deep in doo-doo first over the LA Times not releasing the Khalidi tape, and now this. Message to moguls: Stay away from media companies. They’re poisonous.

JiangxiDad on December 10, 2008 at 10:01 AM

Surely you are referring to Sam Zell and not the former governor from Georgia and former Senator, Zell Miller?

Neocon Peg on December 10, 2008 at 8:00 PM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.