Happy days are here again: Agreement on auto bailout

posted at 7:55 am on December 10, 2008 by Ed Morrissey

An auto in every pot, and a car czar to nationalize an industry.  Aren’t we glad we have a Republican administration running things?  The White House reached an agreement with Congressional Democrats this morning on a $15 billion bailout of the Big Three automakers in Detroit, infusing their operations with enough cash to keep them afloat through the end of March, while transferring significant authority to the government to dictate their operations:

Weary Democratic congressional leaders and White House officials agreed in principle Tuesday on a $15 billion bailout of U.S. automakers that would give the government extraordinary power to restructure the failing industry. But the rescue faced snags as Republicans raised deep concerns.

Congressional aides and a senior administration official said the proposed deal would speed the loans to Detroit’s struggling car companies and place a “car czar” named by President George W. Bush in charge of overhauling the auto industry. Congress could vote on the plan as early as Wednesday and the money could be disbursed within days.

A breakthrough came when negotiators reached a compromise to require the czar to revoke the loans and deny any further federal aid to automakers that don’t strike a deal with labor unions, creditors and others to ensure their survival by next spring — essentially pushing them into bankruptcy.

NBC reported that under the agreement, the czar would bring together all of a company’s stakeholders — creditors, labor, shareholders, management, dealers, etc. — to negotiate a restructuring by March 31. A 30-day extension could be granted if the czar believed the stakeholders were negotiating in good faith and if the czar believed a deal could be reached.

If there was no deal by March 31 and no extension, the czar would be required to call the loan, which would send the company into insolvency. The czar would then be required to propose a course of action, which could include Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization.

So why offer the $15 billion now?  Why not just force them into Chapter 11 now and allow them to renegotiate the contracts under those circumstances?  All this does is spend taxpayer money to maintain a status quo for an extra four months that has already proven unsustainable.  Management and labor won’t have to change positions at all until that time, under this agreement.

Democrats want this as a Trojan horse for government control of private production, and they’re going to get it, unless Republicans stop it.  Republicans in the Senate have already begun to align themselves for a filibuster of the bailout, and a new IBD/TIPP poll shows they have backing from the public.  Almost two thirds of adults, including a majority of Democrats, oppose a bailout:

Sixty-three percent of Americans surveyed in the latest IBD/TIPP Poll — including 66% of investors, 59% of Midwesterners and even 53% of Democrats — disapprove of financial aid for U.S. automakers. Respondents also opposed bailouts for banks and other financial institutions by 53% to 45.5%, with only Democrats and Midwesterners in favor. They were more ambivalent, with 50% opposed and 45% in favor, when it comes to mortgage holders. Help for state and local governments won grudging approval. Republicans were opposed across the board.

Can Senate Republicans hold the line?  It will probably be a close-run thing, especially with the Bush administration signaling its approval of the package.  I’d watch Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins, and Arlen Specter most closely on this question.  The GOP is fortunate in that this question will come before the 110th Congress rather than the 111th, where they will barely have enough in their caucus to block anything.

Of course, that will require Republicans to act like Republicans, and not Democrats Lite.  They have public opinion strongly on their side.  Can they exercise some political courage and stop the runaway bailout train?

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

No no no no no no no.

I can’t take this lunacy.

flyawaybird on December 10, 2008 at 8:00 AM

Well I guess I am going with Honda. When are they coming out with the Volgas?

tarpon on December 10, 2008 at 8:01 AM

Dictate is the operative word.

Valiant on December 10, 2008 at 8:08 AM

Congress passes the Equalization of Opportunity Act. I swear things are looking more like Atlas Shrugged every day. Next they’ll try to cripple the Japanese auto plants in the U.S. to make things more “fair” for the Detroit automakers.

Sarah Palin building her gas pipeline is starting to look like Dagny holding together the Taggart Transcontinental. The few people doing the right thing can’t keep up with the idiots determined to screw things up.

Jim62sch on December 10, 2008 at 8:09 AM

We can count on McCain to suspend his campaign for re-election and push for an even larger bailout.

Valiant on December 10, 2008 at 8:11 AM

I work in the auto industry…….but

How do you tell a worker in Kentucky who’s producing a Toyota that his job is worth less than another American autoworker’s?

nineveh on December 10, 2008 at 8:14 AM

Time to tie up the capitals switchboard! 202-224-3121

becki51758 on December 10, 2008 at 8:14 AM

“Is our politicians listening?” to paraphrase a certain, soon-to-be-ex-President. E-freakin’-gads, I love hyphens today. What is wrong with people in Washington? Do they even CARE what the majority of the people they represent even say? No to the Mortgage bailout? SURE! Here’s 1.5Trillion dollars, and one guy to run it with no oversight…what can go wrong with that? Oops. Auto bailout is not popular at all? Hell, here’s 15Billion dollars and we get to make up cool rhyming names like Rap stars do. We’re so geeky. “Car Czar!” That’ll sell it to the people? What? They don’t like it? Well, Harry says they smell like armpits, so what can they know?

*sigh* I’m honestly considering moving to Japan to teach English as a Second Language, and stuff like this just seems to motivate me even more.

DakRoland on December 10, 2008 at 8:15 AM

Great! Even more of a reason NOT to buy American.
What a scam. I don’t think enough democrats will buy
GM-Ford-Chrysler to make a difference.

Watch – Mark My Words – they will be back as soon as
Obama takes office to get more, more, more.

izoneguy on December 10, 2008 at 8:15 AM

McShamnesty has already indicated he is in favor of it. What an escape we had. The Republican party would be dead for good if he had gotten elected.

only 28% approve of the bailout in the latest Rasmussen poll, too. I wonder if the GOP will find their spine and ignore the chicken littles? They should block it and get all over the TV bragging about how they protected the taxpayer

lodge on December 10, 2008 at 8:17 AM

How much more damage can GWB do before he leaves office?

Just GO AWAY already and take your virgin veto pen with you.

stenwin77 on December 10, 2008 at 8:18 AM

Come on Bush… What’s behind door #3? Car Czar = Mitt!

Oh, the irony would be priceless! The DEMs get their blasted bailout, but at a price they were not aware that they’d have to pay…

gatorboy on December 10, 2008 at 8:18 AM

K, I’m not being obtuse here, and this is a serious question. At what point does revolution enter the picture?

Our forefathers – the ones that had *balls* – went to war over far less than this.

Midas on December 10, 2008 at 8:19 AM

As Ed notes, this is just a Trojan Horse for what the Democrats/Socialist actaully want under Obama — state control of businesses. Socialism rides in on a white horse to save the auto industry.

A pox on all their houses.

johnsteele on December 10, 2008 at 8:22 AM

If it doesn’t pass, Bush and the Republicans will be blamed for ruining the Michigan auto industry — at Christmastime, no less.

All I can say is, two years from now, after two years of Obama, Pelsoi and Reid in charge — nobody will remember that is was Bush who opened the can of worms.

BigD on December 10, 2008 at 8:24 AM

They have public opinion strongly on their side. Can they exercise some political courage and stop the runaway bailout train?

UH….No, they can’t / won’t

Red State State of Mind on December 10, 2008 at 8:24 AM

How many tons of cars will the production goal be for the 5 year plan ?

the_nile on December 10, 2008 at 8:24 AM

I am surprised to see everyone at work today :)

faraway on December 10, 2008 at 8:25 AM

The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

We’ll be on that road with crappy overpriced cars.

tru2tx on December 10, 2008 at 8:29 AM

If it doesn’t pass, Bush and the Republicans will be blamed for ruining the Michigan auto industry — at Christmastime, no less.

The public is soundly against it. I don’t know where you got the idea that the people like these bailouts.

People will blame the auto industry. It’s their mess.

lodge on December 10, 2008 at 8:29 AM

A liberal socialist ongress in control of Detroit

grapeknutz on December 10, 2008 at 8:30 AM

Time to tie up the capitals switchboard! 202-224-3121

becki51758 on December 10, 2008 at 8:14 AM

Don’t waste your time attempting to influence our imperial rulers. Just use your dollar vote.

Don’t buy products from companies that believe in submitting themselves to voluntary fascism.

Stay away from Congressional Motors, Inc.

Dorvillian on December 10, 2008 at 8:30 AM

A liberal socialist in control of Detroit.

grapeknutz on December 10, 2008 at 8:31 AM

Who the hell is gonna buy a car from a company barely hanging on by a thread due primarily to their ridiculous relationship with unions and the related costs attached… and, to make things worse, the whole thing seems a payback to unions for their votes a month ago.

Hell, if the Big 3 had just kept their mouths shut about thier dire straights and allowed the drop in gas prices to help their biz pick up they might have even survived.

At this point, F’ em.

Shivas Irons on December 10, 2008 at 8:32 AM

The public is soundly against it. I don’t know where you got the idea that the people like these bailouts.

People will blame the auto industry. It’s their mess.

lodge on December 10, 2008 at 8:29 AM

The media will blame Bush and the Republicans. So will alot of people in the upper Midwest — trust me, I have alot of family there.

Personally, I am adamantly opposed to it.

BigD on December 10, 2008 at 8:33 AM

Toyota Baby!!!!

gringo69 on December 10, 2008 at 8:33 AM

BigD on December 10, 2008 at 8:33 AM

The media blamed the House GOP for blocking crap sandwich 1.0.

Looking back, do you think the public now appreciates their efforts? They surely do.

lodge on December 10, 2008 at 8:35 AM

I, for one, will NEVER by a car from Ford, GM or Chrysler. EVER.

Buy from the new Big 3 Toyota, Honda, Nissan.

Stephen Macklin on December 10, 2008 at 8:44 AM

The politburo is busy securing the means of production for the premier. We’re speeding down the slippery slope.

rplat on December 10, 2008 at 8:52 AM

Get your DC produced Trabant! They may be backordered for five years, but gee, they sure fall apart fast.

I can’t believe this rampant nationalization of industries. Did I go into a coma and wake up in Venezuela?

mr.blacksheep on December 10, 2008 at 8:55 AM

C’mon people—what’s a meager 15 billion compared to 3 trillion in bailouts before this “damage control” is over.

Taxpayer’s could care less about all this. Besides, the government can print up all the money we need.

Rovin on December 10, 2008 at 8:55 AM

Dorvillian on December 10, 2008 at 8:30 AM

Oh trust me I wont. I will not support any of these bailed out companies.

becki51758 on December 10, 2008 at 9:04 AM

Whatever we are seeing here certainly didn’t originate in Illinois — I doubt Bush got even a single penny from the UAW in the previous Presidential election cycle, and Republicans won’t win anything more from the UAW — the primary beneficiary of the $15B.

No quid pro quo. No backdoor deal. Either a pansy or a guy who’s trying to put all of America first.

unclesmrgol on December 10, 2008 at 9:05 AM

How many tons of cars will the production goal be for the 5 year plan ?

the_nile on December 10, 2008 at 8:24 AM

It’s not the tonnage, it’s whether they will all be right-hand drive only.

OldEnglish on December 10, 2008 at 9:08 AM

If there was no deal by March 31 and no extension, the czar would be required to call the loan, which would send the company into insolvency. The czar would then be required to propose a course of action, which could include Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization.

Bizarre beyond belief.

SlimyBill on December 10, 2008 at 9:12 AM

C’mon people—what’s a meager 15 billion compared to 3 trillion in bailouts before this “damage control” is over.

Rovin on December 10, 2008 at 8:55 AM

Funny, when I first read the piece I actually did think “it’s only 15 billion?”

SlimyBill on December 10, 2008 at 9:14 AM

As a person who pays cash for everything, cars, house, kids college, etc. If I can’t afford it I don’t buy it. All these bailouts are about to give me a coronary. I can’t say I ever been so mad in my entire life.

JackS on December 10, 2008 at 9:16 AM

Come on Bush… What’s behind door #3? Car Czar = Mitt!

Oh, the irony would be priceless! The DEMs get their blasted bailout, but at a price they were not aware that they’d have to pay…

gatorboy on December 10, 2008 at 8:18 AM

You stole that thought out of my head. Wouldn’t the irony be sweet? And who has more expertise in turning companies around?

onlineanalyst on December 10, 2008 at 9:16 AM

Aren’t we glad we have a Republican administration running things?

As Nixon would have said, “We’re all socialists now.”

Bugler on December 10, 2008 at 9:16 AM

No quid pro quo. No backdoor deal. Either a pansy or a guy who’s trying to put all of America first.

unclesmrgol on December 10, 2008 at 9:05 AM

My guess is that Bush is doing this to “protect” his legacy, which is asinine. I don’t like this deal. But before I explain why, let me make a few suggestions as to Ed’s characterizations of the car czar:

1. The car czar doesn’t have the authority to nationalize anything. The money is an unsecured loan. The car czar is functioning as a bank workout officer (except the bank is Uncle Sam).

2. The article is less than clear as to what the car czar’s actual abilities are come March 31st. There’s a reference to having the authority to do an “overhaul,” but I’m not sure what that is. A car czar cannot reject contracts with creditors and the unions or take any related actions without court authority and due process. The only thing I think the car czar could constitutionally be given the power to do is file an involuntary bankruptcy.

The real problem, of course, is that since the car czar doesn’t have any real power, the Democrats can just come in an engineer an even bigger bailout in April. By then, the Republicans won’t be able to filibuster, and they’ll get the car industry a huge bailout without any oversigh or concessions on the part of UAW.

Republicans MUST draw the line in the sand NOW and force the Big Three into bankruptcy. No bridge loan. When GM and Chrysler do their annual plant shutdowns in late December, they should just go file their Chapter 11s. Let the chips fall where they may.

Outlander on December 10, 2008 at 9:16 AM

U.A.W. (1)

Americans (0)

Mark Garnett on December 10, 2008 at 9:23 AM

Directive 10-289 to be announced any day.

thomasaur on December 10, 2008 at 9:26 AM

I will boycott all companies that recieve bailout money, if possible. There are so many.

roninacreage on December 10, 2008 at 9:28 AM

I am surprised to see everyone at work today :)

faraway on December 10, 2008 at 8:25 AM

I’m going to get another job today and then do all my shopping at stores who reject terrorist tactics perpetrated by morally bankrupt limp-wrist noodle nibblers.

csdeven on December 10, 2008 at 9:33 AM

I don’t get it….
Over 60% of the people of the US say “NO” to a bailout, but our fearless leaders are going ahead with it?

What’s next that “We the People” disagree with that will get shoved down our throats, Same-Sex Marriage? Frequent flier miles for Abortions?… I mean… the list goes on….

CynicalOptimist on December 10, 2008 at 9:41 AM

Get your DC produced Trabant! They may be backordered for five years, but gee, they sure fall apart fast.
mr.blacksheep on December 10, 2008 at 8:55 AM

The Trabant was made from Duroplast.

Duroplast was used by Eastern European automobile manufacturer VEB Sachsenring Automobilwerke Zwickau to produce the body of the mass-produced Trabant motor car.

Duroplast’s components are edible, and there are stories of pigs, sheep or other domestic farm animals consuming duroplast.

I found it ironic that the Trabant is consumed by pigs. There’s a pork joke in there somewhere, but I’m just too disgusted with Chimpy to care right now.

csdeven on December 10, 2008 at 9:43 AM

I don’t get it. If they don’t have customers now, and won’t have any 6 months from now, just how is this “loan” going to help them?

huckleberryfriend on December 10, 2008 at 9:44 AM

I tried to contact my Senators and John Warner (retiring) has pulled all contact information from his web site. I am so glad to see him gone. He has been extremely “wobbly” the last few years.

huckleberryfriend on December 10, 2008 at 9:56 AM

At what point does revolution enter the picture?

Our forefathers – the ones that had *balls* – went to war over far less than this.

I am with you. They have no reason to stop. We’ve done everything we can to prove that we actually don’t give enough of a whit to actually *do* anything.

angelat0763 on December 10, 2008 at 10:07 AM

Check out the propaganda website GM has produced

http://gmfactsandfiction.com/

angryed on December 10, 2008 at 10:34 AM

I don’t get it. If they don’t have customers now, and won’t have any 6 months from now, just how is this “loan” going to help them?

huckleberryfriend on December 10, 2008 at 9:44 AM

No you get it. In 6 months they will be begging for more money. And 6 months after that. And 6 months after that….

angryed on December 10, 2008 at 10:35 AM

Once again, the WH has made an agreement with the Dem’s without including Republicans in the process. Watch it blow back at them w/ a filibuster or senatorial hold.

phreshone on December 10, 2008 at 10:42 AM

We were going to order a 2009 Camaro for our son – if the bailout goes through it’s not happening.

Thought the kid would be disappointed when we discussed it but he completely gets it. Taxpayers who are car buyers pay twice – no thanks. He spent the evening looking over comparably priced cars and into the companies… think we are going to test drive the Eclipse & the Tiburon this weekend.

If Detroit had gone chapter 11 we would still be ordering the Camaro…. HEY Detroit we have another kid after this one who wants a Mustang – guess what – she’s looking at a Beemer now.

batterup on December 10, 2008 at 10:55 AM

Is there not one patriot left in Congress. Is there not one honest man in the auto industry.

The idea that infrastructure (bribes, payoffs) is the answer to the crisis is the dumbest most dishonest line of trash ever put forth. I expect no less from a third world dictator blabberings.

nondhimmie on December 10, 2008 at 11:00 AM

I am so pissed off. I can’t see straight. Well, now we know what those idiots in DC think of the People who put their sorry asses in there. I will be writing my disdain to my Reps. I will also take my Malibu LS and trade for a foreign made car. I bought the car in June of this year. Needed a better car for my job. Now I am fuming.

sheebe on December 10, 2008 at 11:11 AM

Midas on December 10, 2008 at 8:19 AM

When the majority of Americans lose one or more of the following due to deteriorating infrastructure or financial inability:

1.Cable TV
2.Internet access
3.Ability to eat at fast-food restaurants more than once a month
4.Restricted mobility because of heavily overtaxed gas, stifling curfews, etc.

Dark-Star on December 10, 2008 at 11:24 AM

As Nixon would have said, “We’re all socialists now.”
Bugler on December 10, 2008 at 9:16 AM

Socialism would be bad, but that’s not what this is. If the government came in and ruthlessly fired everyone who wasn’t productive and instituted draconian management and consolidation policies, there would at least be a CHANCE that the industry could remain viable.

But the US government is going to do the exact opposite of that. They’re going to institute policies to make all workers “equal” under one yoke, with no regard – or even an intentional disregard – to efficiency and effectiveness.

We focus too much on platitudes. What the Democrat Party in America represents is Socialism’s retarded little brother: Communism.

logis on December 10, 2008 at 11:28 AM

What about the whole building the economy from the bottom up? Send citizens checks or vouchers to buy an Amerikan car. But that isn’t what they want, is it? What exactly do they want this cash for? It isn’t going to get people to get out there and buy cars.

JeffinOrlando on December 10, 2008 at 11:34 AM

Can they exercise some political courage and stop the runaway bailout train?

Dear FATHER IN HEAVEN,

Troy Rasmussen on December 10, 2008 at 11:39 AM

Ahem, let me try this again.

Can they exercise some political courage and stop the runaway bailout train?

Dear FATHER IN HEAVEN,

Please grant the Republicans a spine, we would greatly appreciate YOUR help in this matter.

Amen.

Troy Rasmussen on December 10, 2008 at 11:41 AM

If it doesn’t pass, Bush and the Republicans will be blamed for ruining the Michigan auto industry — at Christmastime, no less.

All I can say is, two years from now, after two years of Obama, Pelsoi and Reid in charge — nobody will remember that is was Bush who opened the can of worms.

BigD on December 10, 2008 at 8:24 AM

No matter what Bush and Republicans will get the blame. If it fails, we get the guilt trip like you said. If it passes – 1-2yrs from now when they are still insolvant and asking for more… guess what. “Well it was Bush and Republicans that shoved this on you… we argued for better bailouts.. they said we had to take this one.. if we had our way it would have worked.. blah blah blah”

Pretty much damned if we do, damned if we don’t.

Passed on December 10, 2008 at 12:00 PM

We keep talking about bailouts for the automakers. Lets just call it what it is (a democratic bailout for the UAW). It is obvious that the only way GM, etc. can compete is with major UAW contract modifications which put their labor costs per vehicle in line with the non union manufactures. It is also obvious that the only way to get those changes is Chapter 11. This current bailout bill does not address the problem it just wastes the money and pushes back the decision.

duff65 on December 10, 2008 at 12:55 PM

I’m making a big assumption here but I think that Conservatives buy more American made cars than Liberals do and I, as a Conservative, will never buy another one if the Democrats are going to dictate to the Big 3 how to make cars and what kind to make. A Conservative boycott of the Big 3 will kill them for sure. They will never again be viable.

DerKrieger on December 10, 2008 at 1:23 PM

I work in the auto industry…….but

How do you tell a worker in Kentucky who’s producing a Toyota that his job is worth less than another American autoworker’s?

nineveh on December 10, 2008 at 8:14 AM

So everybody in every industry has to make the same amount as the other guy? Sounds like you’ve been “unionized” in your way of thinking. This is what’s killing the industry.

Or would that be “unfair”?

BierManVA on December 10, 2008 at 1:31 PM

Question: what cars do members of congress drives? anyone knows? Do they support American companies with their own money, or expect us the taxpayer to?

Besides Kucinich with his UFO, of course.

dIb on December 10, 2008 at 2:32 PM