Change.gov hiding questions on Blagojevich scandal

posted at 9:10 pm on December 10, 2008 by Ed Morrissey

How’s that Hope and ChangeTM working out at Change.gov, the transition website for President-Elect Barack Obama?  They seem to have the change part down pat, at least.  Ben Smith of Politico notes that the Obamaphiles have tubed comments relating to the scandal surrounding Rod Blagojevich, and that Team Obama seems happy to let them continue:

President-elect Barack Obama’s Transition today launched “Open for Questions,” a Digg-style feature allowing citizens to submit questions, and to vote on one another’s questions, bringing favored inquiries to the top of the list.

It was suggested when it launched that the tool would bring uncomfortable questions to the fore, but the results so far are the opposite: Obama’s supporters appear to be using — and abusing — a tool allowing them to “flag” questions as “inappropriate” to remove all questions mentioning Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich from the main pages of Obama’s website.

The Blagojevich questions — many of them polite and reasonable — can be found only by searching words in them, like “Blagojevich,” which produces 35 questions missing from the main page of the site.

Questions removed from the site:

  • Given the current corruption charges involving Blagojevich, will ‘serious’ campaign finance reform that takes money completely out of politics through publicly funded elections be a priority in the first term?
  • In light of the recent corruption scandals (Blagojevich, Rangel, Jefferson, Stevens, etc) that have dominated the political scene,is there any ethics legislation being crafted to actually curb corruption and prevent another wave of nixonian cynicism?
  • Is Barack Obama aware of any communications in the last six weeks between Rod Blagojevich or anyone representing Rod Blagojevich and any of Obama’s top aides?

On a campaign web site, a candidate and his staff would understandably rid themselves of anything embarrassing so that the candidate didn’t have to answer for it.  Obama stopped being a candidate on November 4th, and became the President-Elect.  We know this, because Obama has a government website and a big sign that says ‘OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT-ELECT’ with his faux seal at every press conference.

In other words, it’s time for accountability.  If Obama doesn’t want to answer tough questions, he should stop trolling for them on official government websites.  And since we’re all paying for it, nobody should be able to force those questions off of an official government website.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

Obama meets all his personal/political challenges with silence. First with Wright. Then Ayers. Then the financial ‘crisis’ and congressional bailout. Then Blagojevich. I’m sure I’ve missed a few here and there, but you get the picture.

He says nothing. He takes no real position. He lets stuff swirl and happen around and to him, but allows himself to be a subject by omission only.

Welcome to HopeyChangey, folks.

redfoxbluestate on December 11, 2008 at 4:33 PM

He doesn’t want to answer tough questions and he didn’t throughout his campaign.

Why would he start answering them now?

NoDonkey on December 11, 2008 at 5:13 PM

Let the rein of terror begin! Rahm-O-Corruptollia! This message brought ot you by; Appointees without conscience!

Griz on December 11, 2008 at 5:52 PM

Why would anybody be surprised that the latest demagogue is controlling his propaganda.

And why who anybody be surprised that his zombie followers do it for him.

We’ve seen this all before, many times.

Just not in this country.

notagool on December 11, 2008 at 8:54 PM

ok so Senate seats can be bought. gee, and Senators can win Presidential spots, so this mean Presidential spots are buyable. They treat it like court case now anyway. Objecting to evidence ‘ballots’ and working the system, casting false impressions of the other side are all now the way to get in. Nice. Real F–n nice

johnnyU on December 11, 2008 at 10:52 PM

All I can say is that John Corzine must feel like a real moron, having sunk over $100 million of his own cash to get his time in the Senate. They were, comparatively, giving the seats away over in Illinois.

progressoverpeace on December 12, 2008 at 12:40 AM

It’s the first time I ever went on the site. I don’t think I will be going back. For all the bad press we get about our intolerance, I can honestly say I have never read a more intolerant bunch of nonsense in my life.

church on December 10, 2008 at 11:44 PM

Just out of curiosity, why were you posting numerous anti-Semitic remarks in the first place?

fossten on December 12, 2008 at 6:56 AM

Comment pages: 1 2 3