Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Shelby: We might filibuster the auto bailout

posted at 12:15 pm on December 8, 2008 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Sure you will, pal.

[ITG chief economist Robert] Barbera warned that opposition to lending either the $17 billion agreed to — or the $34 billon that the car companies originally requested — could result in the stock markets’ plunging by hundreds of billions of dollars. And that does not include the billions of dollars in unemployment insurance benefits and pension bailouts that would be required to assist not just the displaced auto workers, but also the many other workers, like truck drivers and waitresses, whose jobs depend on the Big Three.

“There will be tremendous regret if we don’t help them avoid bankruptcy in the next few weeks or months,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist with Moody’s Economy.com. “If they go into bankruptcy now, they’ll go into liquidation and there will be the loss of hundreds of thousands, if not a million, jobs — on top of the four or five million we’re going to lose. That will add almost a point to unemployment by itself.”

If the GOP votes against the bailout but foregoes the filibuster, they spend the next two years pounding Obama and the Dems for showering taxpayer cash on a wrecked industry to the tune of $75-$125 billion. (“The first down payment is just the beginning,” warns Shelby.) If they do filibuster, Obama and the Dems spend the next two years falsely blaming every last uptick in unemployment on a chain reaction begun by the GOP killing off a rescue of American automotives. Even Jeff Sessions is hinting he’ll vote for a short-term bridge loan to keep them afloat until the mess can be safely dumped on the new deep blue Congress. Not that tough of a choice.

The Democratic plan’s still being worked out, but the gist is that cash infusions for the Big Three going forward will be contingent upon their proving to Obama’s cabinet that they’re restructuring their way to profitability. If they can’t, the tap gets turned off and the companies will presumably be allowed to fail. Anyone who seriously believes the Democrats will let that happen in the middle of a recession that’s going to get worse before it gets better, especially as we get closer to the midterms, raise your hand. Exit question: Remind me again, given the credit crunch, who’s going to be buying these cars, exactly?


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

do it and save yourselves

dont and be lost to the headlines

Drunk Report on December 8, 2008 at 12:19 PM

“might?’

Don’t go Boehner on us.

Let’s roll.

ex-Democrat on December 8, 2008 at 12:19 PM

I know DeMint knows what is right here but my other senator, Graham, probably doesn’t. The auto-industry is doing quite well in SC mainly due to non-union plants. We don’t need a bailout down here and voting for one does nothing for Graham’s constituents. Then again, he called us all racists for not supporting amnesty.

cadams on December 8, 2008 at 12:20 PM

I think I will quit paying my income taxes and instead ask the gubernut for financial assistance in order to save “Main Street”. This makes more sense then bailing out a failed auto industry knowing the money will never be paid back and they are only delaying the inevitable.

trs on December 8, 2008 at 12:24 PM

Don’t filbuster…just state and make it perfectly clear that the you don’t agree with the democrats, that they are responsible for this, vote down the party line.

right2bright on December 8, 2008 at 12:24 PM

The Republicans should vote as a block against this bailout. Make the Dems pass it. Then Bush should veto it.

There’s no reason the Big 3 can’t wait a month or so for Lightworker to be in charge. Hang this boondoggle around his neck.

Y-not on December 8, 2008 at 12:24 PM

What is with the GOP these days? “Might.” It’s a no-brainer.

chunderroad on December 8, 2008 at 12:24 PM

I heart my AL Senators.

Sessions over Shelby. But both outstanding compared to a lot of them out there.

AeroSpear on December 8, 2008 at 12:25 PM

I heart my AL Senators.

Sessions over Shelby. But both outstanding compared to a lot of them out there.

AeroSpear on December 8, 2008 at 12:25 PM

You in North Ala. AeroSpear? My self Winston Co.

Alex Martinez on December 8, 2008 at 12:27 PM

Exit question: Remind me again, given the credit crunch, who’s going to be buying these cars, exactly?

We went into a local chevy dealer about a month ago. I was cconsidering trading the mini van for a suburban. Anyway, the sales guy said he had a great LTZ, which stickered at 50K that he could sell us for 33K. sounded pretty good. we thought we’d sleep on it. the next day, the guy called and said, “I have good news and bad news. Good news is that I can sell you that car for 30K. Bad news is we can’t give you loan.”

I guess the answer to your exit question is: no one. That car was selling at 20K off sticker and we wouldn’t bite.

pullingmyhairout on December 8, 2008 at 12:31 PM

There’s no reason the Big 3 can’t wait a month or so for Lightworker to be in charge. Hang this boondoggle around his neck.

Y-not on December 8, 2008 at 12:24 PM

There’s no way that all three of the Big Three can survive until 1/20/09 without filing bankruptcy. Chrysler already hired bankruptcy counsel.

What the Republicans need to do right now is to blast talking points 24/7 that greedy unions are to blame, and that they will not support a bailout unless there are significant union concessions in addition to management concessions. Management has already come to the table (although only on the executive comp issue), but the unions don’t want to play ball.

So you put Democrats between a rock and a hard place. I’m telling you, most ordinary Americans do not look favorably on the auto workers union. People intuitively know that they are grossly overpaid. Put a dollar figure to it. “Why should a taxpayer working for $25 an hour bail out a union auto worker making $60 an hour?” Frame the debate that way, and the Democrats either have to help break the back of the unions, OR the Democrats’ bailout fails and the Big Three go into Chapter 11.

Outlander on December 8, 2008 at 12:35 PM

Exit question: Remind me again, given the credit crunch, who’s going to be buying these cars, exactly?

Beats me. Although, from my perspective, it’s certainly possible. My husband and I have currently saved up enough money to buy one without credit, but we’re saving it for something else.

Esthier on December 8, 2008 at 12:37 PM

Did anyone find the Constitutional authorization for government to bail out any part of our economy, yet?

Anyone? Bueller?

Anyone care?

Is this still America? Or was that repealed?

LimeyGeek on December 8, 2008 at 12:38 PM

My husband and I have currently saved up enough money to buy one without credit, but we’re saving it for something else.

Esthier on December 8, 2008 at 12:37 PM

Wait thats the old American way of doing things, why you need to finance your next purchase. lol

Alex Martinez on December 8, 2008 at 12:39 PM

Esthier on December 8, 2008 at 12:37 PM

“Saving” ? That’s a strange concept. Why don’t you educate America about it?

;)

LimeyGeek on December 8, 2008 at 12:39 PM

Filibuster this crap sandwich. Lehman is the only thing the govt has done right throughout this whole boondoggle.

lodge on December 8, 2008 at 12:40 PM

Vote against it, but save the filibuster for something coming down the pike later, such as some frontal assault on the Constitution. They are going to need all the political capital they have.

RushBaby on December 8, 2008 at 12:42 PM

Vote against it, but save the filibuster for something coming down the pike later, such as some frontal assault on the Constitution. They are going to need all the political capital they have.

This is a frontal assault on the constitution. A frickin Car Czar? Govt. and corporations working together? That’s collectivism.

lodge on December 8, 2008 at 12:44 PM

There’s no way that all three of the Big Three can survive until 1/20/09 without filing bankruptcy. Chrysler already hired bankruptcy counsel.

Could Congress vote to suspend their corporate tax obligations for some period of time? If so, would that tip their balance sheet enough to the good for them to survive for a few more months?

Is it the end of the world if they go belly up?

What the Republicans need to do right now is to blast talking points 24/7 that greedy unions are to blame, and that they will not support a bailout unless there are significant union concessions in addition to management concessions. Management has already come to the table (although only on the executive comp issue), but the unions don’t want to play ball.

I am concerned that filibustering will be manipulated by the media as Republicans blocking a solution. They would be better to go on the offensive, as you suggest Outlander, with their own solution — one that requires real concessions by the UAW.

Related question: How are Toyota America and the other foreign car manufacturers with plants here doing financially in light of the credit crunch?

Y-not on December 8, 2008 at 12:47 PM

This is a frontal assault on the constitution. A frickin Car Czar? Govt. and corporations working together? That’s collectivism.

lodge on December 8, 2008 at 12:44 PM

No, it’s going around the constitution. What I fear is them tampering with the actual constitution, or its amendments.

RushBaby on December 8, 2008 at 12:47 PM

Is it ok to applaud when someone does the right thing for the wrong reason?

Tommy_G on December 8, 2008 at 12:48 PM

No, it’s going around the constitution. What I fear is them tampering with the actual constitution, or its amendments.

Going around the constitution is an assault on the constitution. If more people understood this, we wouldnt be in this mess

lodge on December 8, 2008 at 12:49 PM

Alex Martinez on December 8, 2008 at 12:39 PM
LimeyGeek on December 8, 2008 at 12:39 PM

Oh, I know. I sometimes feel like my husband and I are actually children of the Great Depression the way we put money away.

But I really don’t get the concept of car buying that most people ascribe to. If I can’t afford it now, then I really can’t afford the extra charges they’ll put on it if they allow me to make payments.

We buy used cars in cash and save thousands.

Esthier on December 8, 2008 at 12:49 PM

No, it’s going around the constitution. What I fear is them tampering with the actual constitution, or its amendments.

RushBaby on December 8, 2008 at 12:47 PM

If they go around it often enough, they won’t need to change it.

Nathan_OH on December 8, 2008 at 12:52 PM

Going around the constitution is an assault on the constitution. If more people understood this, we wouldnt be in this mess

lodge on December 8, 2008 at 12:49 PM

You perceive that it depends on public perception, and that’s good. Because you perceive that people do NOT understand. The Enemedia is busy portraying Republican opposition to this as supporting cheering that people are losing their jobs and their homes. This is a battle we cannot win. That bailout is going through. We have to bide our time and pick a battle we can win.

RushBaby on December 8, 2008 at 12:58 PM

[ITG chief economist Robert] Barbera warned that opposition to lending either the $17 billion agreed to — or the $34 billion that the car companies originally requested — could result in the stock markets’ plunging by hundreds of billions of dollars. And that does not include the billions of dollars in unemployment insurance benefits and pension bailouts that would be required to assist not just the displaced auto workers, but also the many other workers, like truck drivers and waitresses, whose jobs depend on the Big Three.

This is complete bullshit. The three companies were headed for extinction as their stock prices were near zero. Now because of other background developments they are in DC begging for free dough under the guise they are too big to fail. Bullshit.

The Repubs need to do whatever they have to to put these companies in Chapter 11. Up until Paulson/Bernanke/Bush started nationalizing the financial markets that is where all companies went that were poorly managed.

Now Pelosi/Reid/Obama want to take over from Bush and nationalize the auto companies, then health-care and then most every company connected to energy under the pretense of capping CO2 emissions.

What the f’k has happened to us in these last six months? Tell me what part of this stupid f’king journey is any different then the Chavez route? Keep thinking, there is none. Each was formulated on national emergencies. Read the quote above. Barbera sounds like a Propaganda Ministry official warning about the “great Satan” invading.

We are so f’ked.

patrick neid on December 8, 2008 at 12:59 PM

Esthier on December 8, 2008 at 12:49 PM

I never understood the mania over having the ‘latest’ model – it’s a scam to keep people hooked into a never-ending loan cycle.

If we need a new vehicle, we hunt down the previous year’s dealer models – they’re usually nicely appointed, with at most a couple thousand miles on the clock. Save thousands.

Saved over $10K on a 5.7Hemi 300C with only 500 miles.

LimeyGeek on December 8, 2008 at 12:59 PM

You perceive that it depends on public perception, and that’s good. Because you perceive that people do NOT understand. The Enemedia is busy portraying Republican opposition to this as supporting cheering that people are losing their jobs and their homes. This is a battle we cannot win. That bailout is going through. We have to bide our time and pick a battle we can win.

You’re forgetting that this bailout will not work. Car sales are gonna fall off a cliff, and GM weren’t profitable in even 2006 – the biggest car market ever. They’ve made no real changes to the union contracts or major layoffs.

Republicans are gonna look like geniuses when the big three come back begging for more.

lodge on December 8, 2008 at 1:00 PM

The ‘big three’ need to be bought up for a song by competitors and gutted like fish. Unions out. UAW lackeys fired. Lazy workers fired. Real estate sold for profit.

Trim them down, lean’n'mean. That’ll get things moving again.

LimeyGeek on December 8, 2008 at 1:05 PM

One thing’s for sure, if they don’t hear from everyone, this bailout – and all the bailouts to come – are a lot more likely.

Click here and you can send a fax to your own members of Congress, or all of them.

Drew McKissick on December 8, 2008 at 1:06 PM

If we need a new vehicle, we hunt down the previous year’s dealer models – they’re usually nicely appointed, with at most a couple thousand miles on the clock. Save thousands.

Saved over $10K on a 5.7Hemi 300C with only 500 miles.

LimeyGeek on December 8, 2008 at 12:59 PM

That’s a great way to do that as well. Some of those cars are only used for test drives, but they’re still sell for thousands less once the new year comes.

Esthier on December 8, 2008 at 1:08 PM

Limey Geek @12:38

Preamble to the US Constitution

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

It is in the interest of the US to promote the general welfare of it’s citizens my providing employment . . . yada..yada…yada…just ask any liberal.

It comes down to one question; what is the purpose of government. Conservatives believe that the role of government is to provide the framework, and maintain, a lawful civil society. Meanwhile modern liberals believe it is now the role of government to provide for the needs of citizens.

This really isn’t an assault on the constitution, nor going around the constitution it is redefining the language in which the constitution is written.

You know, we really did make a mistake not saving the jobs of everyone employed in the manufacturing of horse drawn vehicles. All those poor people put out of work by the automobile industry.

Skandia Recluse on December 8, 2008 at 1:15 PM

lodge on December 8, 2008 at 1:00 PM

As you said, the problem with the auto unions will not be solved, and there will be consequences. So long as no Republicans go along, the Democrats, who will vote for the bailout, will own the results. Right now R’s are vulnerable to media savaging as sore-losing, ODS-infested, job-killing, heartless corporatists. A premature filibuster would backfire badly because we have no messaging leverage in the press.

Later, when the country has had time to savor the consequences of Dem policies, and a filibuster is really needed, it will have some political capital attached to it. Let the Dems spend their political capital and erode their current polularity. It will happen, just be patient. Then fight from a position of strength. Right now, it will just be perceived as ankle-biting.

RushBaby on December 8, 2008 at 1:23 PM

Is this still America? Or was that repealed?

LimeyGeek on December 8, 2008 at 12:38 PM

Yes, repealed by 9th District Court.

ex-Democrat on December 8, 2008 at 1:28 PM

It is the official policy of the United States that we do not negotiate with terrorists unions.

James on December 8, 2008 at 1:31 PM

RushBaby on December 8, 2008 at 1:23 PM

I couldnt care less what it looks like in the media. This bailout is treason.

lodge on December 8, 2008 at 1:37 PM

Skandia Recluse on December 8, 2008 at 1:15 PM

You really had me going at first ;)

You are quite right, of course. At the heart of this moronic ‘living constitution’ cult is the belief that we can simply pretend that historical literary constructs mean anything we want them to.

LimeyGeek on December 8, 2008 at 1:37 PM

I couldnt care less what it looks like in the media. This bailout is treason.

lodge on December 8, 2008 at 1:37 PM

No. Not treason. A direct and impeachable violation of their constitutionally-sworn duties.

Everyone backing these ‘bailouts’ should be impeached.

LimeyGeek on December 8, 2008 at 1:39 PM

I’m jealous of his constituients. I love this guy.Republicans must Vote against it, but hold off on the filabuster for now. We might really need it later.

BiasedGirl on December 8, 2008 at 1:39 PM

This bailout is treason.

lodge on December 8, 2008 at 1:37 PM

That has no significance in today’s realpolitik.

RushBaby on December 8, 2008 at 1:45 PM

Just vote against the bailout. Don’t use a filibuster.

The American public has learned a lot over the last few weeks about how much money these UAW get per hour and the “jobs bank” has not gone over well. Why buy a new car in this economy when you can get a 3 year old car in good condition at 1/2 the original sticker price?? The liberals want to use these three companies to go “green.” Let them!! Who is going to buy a car that is good for less than 100k miles before it needs a battery replacement??

Unless the bailout has more government money going out to give rebates to buyers of new cars, I don’t see the public doing it on their own. If they try something like this, they cannot restrict it to just the Detroit 3. People will buy from a company they believe will be there in 3 to 4 years, not a bunch that may not last through 2009.

ny59giants on December 8, 2008 at 1:47 PM

and a CNN poll put 61% opposed to the bailout, so how is this bad PR for the Republicans?

People were saying the GOP had to support the No Bank Left Behind Act too, because it would look like the GOP didnt care about saving the economy. How did that work out?

You see, being an ideologue is the key to success

lodge on December 8, 2008 at 1:48 PM

“Ok, but I could set the building on fire…”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWp-Rj5o9uA&feature=related

Agrippa2k on December 8, 2008 at 1:52 PM

Lodge: It wouldn’t be bad PR for the Republicans…if they had a media willing to frame it that way to the American people.

RushBaby on December 8, 2008 at 1:57 PM

Lodge: It wouldn’t be bad PR for the Republicans…if they had a media willing to frame it that way to the American people.

The media was lobbying for the bank bailout too

lodge on December 8, 2008 at 1:58 PM

The media was lobbying for the bank bailout too

lodge on December 8, 2008 at 1:58 PM

Go read how the media is busy hanging the Freddie Mac problems on Republicans…as we type.

RushBaby on December 8, 2008 at 2:00 PM

Could Congress vote to suspend their corporate tax obligations for some period of time? If so, would that tip their balance sheet enough to the good for them to survive for a few more months?

Y-not on December 8, 2008 at 12:47 PM

This whole problem is intimately tied to these companies not posting any profit. As such, I don’t believe they are paying any taxes as it is.
Granted, we should toss the whole corporate tax thing out the window anyway, and tax dividends as if they were interest.

Count to 10 on December 8, 2008 at 2:05 PM

Is this still America? Or was that repealed?

LimeyGeek on December 8, 2008 at 12:38 PM

Yep, Nov 2008, Dec 8 2008, Dec 15 2008, official Jan 20 2009.

N4646W on December 8, 2008 at 2:06 PM

This whole problem is intimately tied to these companies not posting any profit. As such, I don’t believe they are paying any taxes as it is.

Don’t they still pay property taxes or the equivalent? You seem to know more about this than I do, but I just can’t believe they aren’t paying taxes on their assets and per unit sold.

Y-not on December 8, 2008 at 2:29 PM

Can those who feel the auto industry should allow to fail explain what to do when employment numbers top 10%? And there’s no auto industry?

DeathToMediaHacks on December 8, 2008 at 2:41 PM

Can those who feel the auto industry should allow to fail explain what to do when employment numbers top 10%? And there’s no auto industry?

Maybe someone who knows how to run an auto industry will buy up the plants and employ people at competitive wages and make cars people around the world want to buy….maybe?

lodge on December 8, 2008 at 2:45 PM

Can those who feel the auto industry should allow to fail explain what to do when employment numbers top 10%? And there’s no auto industry?

DeathToMediaHacks on December 8, 2008 at 2:41 PM

and you think this bailout is going to stop this?? oh please.

the government shouldn’t be making decisions about who survives or falls. we’re back in the USSR.

right4life on December 8, 2008 at 2:45 PM

DeathToMediaHacks on December 8, 2008 at 2:41 PM

Unemployment will not rise significantly. You are fallaciously assuming that once GM ‘goes under’ that all the buildings/factories/jobs will evaporate – they will not. There will be a crossover period of downtime, perhaps, but current workers will still be needed to operate the facilities once they are bought out by new owners. And they will be bought. Cheap.

For those that are inevitably left unemployed, I suggest they find new jobs and stop looking for politicians to pander to them as if life owes them a damned thing.

LimeyGeek on December 8, 2008 at 3:25 PM

To begin with Senator Shelby’s mouth isn’t the only thing that’s crooked. He had an active role in using state incentives in attracting Mercedes, Hyundai, Toyota and Honda plants to Alabama, so his hypocrisy is stunning. Alabama gets $1.40 in federal spending for every tax dollar they send to Washington. Michigan gets 81 cents. So Michigan taxpayers have effectively been subsidizing Alabama so it can help Detroit’s competitors. Alabama has spent $650 million in incentives to foreign owned auto companies. Sen. Corker’s Tennessee gave Nissan a $197 million package to move their NA HQ from California.

Those who say that Detroit hasn’t changed are ignoramuses or deliberately lying. I’m no fan of the UAW but that union has made enormous concessions. Don’t tell me about “job banks” when there are 1.8 million federal employees who mostly sit on their asses and get an avg of over $100,000 year in wages and benefits. That’s right, the average federal employee makes more than a UAW worker.

If GM is liquidated, the job that is lost may be very well your own. You may think you’re removed from the auto industry, but if the automotive supply chain fails, and it will fail if GM or Ford is liquidated, many businesses seemingly far removed from Detroit and its problems will have to cut back. If the supply chain fails, not only will Toyota and Honda have difficulty building cars here (they use the same suppliers and if the suppliers are out of business Toyondissandai can’t buy components), but our defense contractors will have production difficulties as well.

I’m a free market guy who hates the idea of gov’t subsidies for business, but this is a shit sandwich we may have to eat.

It’s easy to figure out if a politician opposes loans to Detroit. All you need to do is see if they have foreign owned automotive plants in their state and if they get back more federal spending than taxes paid.

If Shelby was honest he’d at least say he’s protecting the interest of businesses in his state, but he won’t say that. At the most he’ll say that those foreign owned automakers with plants in Alabama and the rest of the South are better managed than the Detroit 3. Considering that those plants build primarily SUVs and have been cutting production and offering workers buyouts, I’m not sure they’re any better managed than Ford or GM.

Last week I heard Gov. Sanford of South Carolina (home to a BMW plant) saying that his state’s taxpayers shouldn’t be subsidizing the pensions of California firefighters. While California’s bloated and entitled public payroll is a problem, the reality is that at 90 cents on their federal tax dollar, and SC’s $1.14, it’s California taxpayers who are subsidizing Gov. Sanford’s employees.

Of course, in light of the events of 1860-1865, it’s an open question as to whether or not Alabama, South Carolina and other states in the South actually support the idea of the United States. They sure do like Northern tax revenues and jobs they can steal from the Midwest, though.

rokemronnie on December 8, 2008 at 3:35 PM

Unemployment will not rise significantly. You are fallaciously assuming that once GM ‘goes under’ that all the buildings/factories/jobs will evaporate – they will not. There will be a crossover period of downtime, perhaps, but current workers will still be needed to operate the facilities once they are bought out by new owners. And they will be bought. Cheap.

You’re fallaciously assuming that the supply chain will survive when they lose their three biggest customers, as well as take a hit directly to their bottom line because they’re not going to get paid what they’re owed.

When a supplier goes out of business it impacts business both above and below them in the supply chain. While many vendors also sell globally as well as to the foreign transplant operations, they are still financially dependent on the Detroit 3 and if the domestics are liquidated those suppliers will fail.

You think that someone will just buy up the GM plants and start making Toyondissandais. It takes close to a year and hundreds of millions of dollars to switch an assembly plant to a completely different model. Since even Toyota’s credit rating has gone down, the money’s not going to be available.

Unless you think that folks will buy Malibus renamed as Toyotas. But then you probably believe that “nobody” buys American cars anymore, ignoring the domestics’ 55% market share. It makes more sense to say, with their <3% market share, that nobody buys Apple computers anymore.

Ever car maker, domestic or foreign, has seen their sales drop at least 30%. If the supply chain for the domestics fail, it will also hurt the foreign brands. Detroit and its supply chain continue to be leading innovators in technology. They still are granted the yeoman’s share of automotive patents, including in alternative energy and related “green” technologies.

But please, go ahead and call my neighbors lazy and greedy. I suppose that you are the only hard working Americans around.

rokemronnie on December 8, 2008 at 3:44 PM

rokemronnie on December 8, 2008 at 3:44 PM

I can’t even begin to address all the spin-off strawmen you stuffed your posts with.

The auto giants have masses of valuable assets – material, process and human – that can be bought up, stripped down and retooled or resold or refined. There is no need to start making “Toyondissandais”, continue making the successful models and dump the rest – oh, I forgot there’s gubmint regulations getting in the way of that….so who’s the real villain here?

Yes, jobs will be lost. No, it won’t be the end of the world. With such currently valuable infrastructure, these industries don’t just dry up and blow away. They change shape, sure, and relocate sometimes, but as an economic entity they keep going until there is no more use for them. I think the auto industry has some more mileage left, it isn’t ready for the ‘horse & buggy’ scrapyard just yet.

I suspect that the jobs you do see being shed will reveal just how absurdly overburdened these giants were. This is gonna hurt the unions. As it should.

LimeyGeek on December 8, 2008 at 4:00 PM

rokemronnie on December 8, 2008 at 3:35 PM

Do you realize that in all those words you just admitted that cutting taxes works to revitalize business?

That the states in the most trouble are high tax states?

That the companies, and states in trouble are the most generous in pay and benefits?

Skandia Recluse on December 8, 2008 at 4:11 PM

Can those who feel the auto industry should allow to fail explain what to do when employment numbers top 10%? And there’s no auto industry?

No auto industry? Put down the bong. There is a huge auto industry here and it would be much healthier if these junkyard companies were allowed to survive or perish on their own. The reason 61% of the American people are against this bailout proposal is because these are failing companies. Their stocks were trading at 50 year lows and they were heading for bankruptcy until this bailout mania started.

The general background noise and resistance to bailing out Detroit is due to the marketplace having previously determined that the Big Three are incompetent.

No amount of lipstick is going to change this. In fact, no matter the sums involved, they who are about to be scalped view the money as going down a rat hole. If, as previously mentioned, the companies instead were Mercedes, BMW etc the money would be forthcoming with no hesitation because they are viewed as viable institutions. GM, Ford and Chrysler? You have to be kidding.

Why the bank bailouts? They had been very viable firms. It is for this reason that financial institutions were given the benefit of the doubt. Many had been 100 year old companies that had built solid reputations. GM, Ford and Chrysler have done the opposite over the last 40 years.

If we were truly a free market economy they would go out of business as the other 50 or more auto companies went out of business between 1910 and 1940. In their stead all the better run auto companies would build and open new factories to take advantage of the new marketplace, hiring 100’s of thousands. The free market would invent a better mouse trap in a few difficult years.

Now we no longer believe in such a market. We will pay dearly for this shortcoming.

patrick neid on December 8, 2008 at 4:15 PM

I’ve had it with this auto bailout and have had it with RINO’s coming up with rationale to support it. The Big Three are dead. We’re going to send them tens of billions of dollars and they are STILL going to have to close plants. Then what happens when the people canned start to take over the factories like those union idiots in Chicago are doing? The government is strong-arming BOA into sinking more money into a failed company there just like they did with Freddie/Fannie. This just never ends. Any so-called Republican that supports this needs to be removed from office during their next election.

grdred944 on December 8, 2008 at 4:23 PM

You’d think the senator would be willing to work with Big Auto after they named that engine after him.

jgapinoy on December 8, 2008 at 4:53 PM

I can’t even begin to address all the spin-off strawmen you stuffed your posts with.

In other words, you can’t rebut what I wrote.

The auto giants have masses of valuable assets – material, process and human – that can be bought up, stripped down and retooled or resold or refined.

The plants and tooling are only valuable to their current owners. It costs hundreds of millions of dollars to change over an assembly plant to new models.

There is no need to start making “Toyondissandais”, continue making the successful models and dump the rest –

Stop the presses! I thought that “nobody” buys “American junk” anymore. You mean that Detroit actually makes some competitive models? You think the 40% of Americans who would never think of buying an American car will start to buy Malibus because they will be made by Toyota?

oh, I forgot there’s gubmint regulations getting in the way of that….so who’s the real villain here?

No argument from me. While you’re talking about the gov’t don’t forget to mention lawyers. GM spends more on product liability insurance and litigation than they do on the hourly labor costs of building cars.

Tell me, how will the hypothetical buyers of those assets build cars when the supply chain is no longer?

rokemronnie on December 8, 2008 at 6:41 PM

Do you realize that in all those words you just admitted that cutting taxes works to revitalize business?

Read my lips. I’m a free market conservative/libertarian. Just because I happen to recognize reality and I’m not a Losertarian more in love with ideology than pragmatic solutions doesn’t mean I think that state and federal governments aren’t bloated.

That the states in the most trouble are high tax states?

The main reason why Alabama and other southern states are “low tax” states is because taxpayers in the Midwest, California and New Jersey ($0.65 in federal spending per every dollar NJ sends to Wash.) are directly and indirectly subsidizing those states? You think Alabama got that $650 million they gave to Mercedes, Hyundai, Toyota and Honda came from Alabama taxpayers?

rokemronnie on December 8, 2008 at 6:48 PM

If, as previously mentioned, the companies instead were Mercedes, BMW etc the money would be forthcoming with no hesitation because they are viewed as viable institutions. GM, Ford and Chrysler? You have to be kidding.

“Viewed”, perhaps but perception isn’t always reality. When Daimler bought Chrysler, at the time Chrysler was more profitable than M-B. Moving to the present, BMW is cutting production at their plant in SC, offering buyouts to workers. Mercedes has drastically cut production at their SUV plant in Alabama so near and dear to Shelby’s heart. Ford turned a profit in the 1st quarter of this year.

Why the bank bailouts? They had been very viable firms.

AIG was viable? Lehman Bros? Bear Stearns? Why are the taxpayers backstopping $300 billion in bad debt for Citi? On paper the banks are just as insolvent as the auto companies.

GM, Ford and Chrysler have done the opposite over the last 40 years.

And despite any evidence to the contrary, you will continue to believe that Detroit makes junk.

Google [Toyota engine sludge] and tell me about reputations.

rokemronnie on December 8, 2008 at 6:54 PM

If we were truly a free market economy they would go out of business as the other 50 or more auto companies went out of business between 1910 and 1940. In their stead all the better run auto companies would build and open new factories to take advantage of the new marketplace, hiring 100’s of thousands. The free market would invent a better mouse trap in a few difficult years.

Not without a supplier base. The problem is that so few Americans are involved in manufacturing that they don’t know what a supply chain is and how vulnerable it can be to disruption.

rokemronnie on December 8, 2008 at 6:56 PM

You’d think the senator would be willing to work with Big Auto after they named that engine after him.

And this is supposedly what passes for informed commentary?

Shelby is not the name of an engine, nor has it ever been.

I can’t believe that so-called conservatives are giving a hypocrite like Richard Shelby a pass. Why not ask him how much money he’s getting from Mercedes and Hyundai?

rokemronnie on December 8, 2008 at 6:58 PM

roke,

God bless you but you have not a clue on how the market works. GM, Chrysler and Ford are considered the three worst car companies in the world. That is why their stocks were basically at zero. Mercedes sold Chrysler because they realized it was a hopeless company with useless union contract employees and managers.

As to the other companies cutting production, of course they are. The world economy has slowed to a crawl. The problems that are plaguing Detroit have nothing to do with the slowdown. GM etc have been losing market share for 30 years because they are an embarrassment in the industrial world.

As to the workers being laid off etc, cry me a river. Everyone else in the real world is subject to being laid off without, I might add these stupid union contracts that have put these companies on the welfare line.

The absolute best thing that could happen to these companies is to go into Chapter 11 and face the reality of being shit companies with shit management. Instead you are looking for a handout under the pretense that these companies are important. They are no such thing. They are way past their due dates. Clear them out and let smartly run companies take their places building better autos. Don’t even try to compare any of these companies to Toyota.

Basically I think the workers who didn’t take the golden parachutes they have been offered over the last several years were idiots.

Here’s a prediction–even with bailouts these companies are still going under and they deserve it. Tell me again who bailed out all the internet companies back in 2002-03 with their 100’s of thousands of employees. Go check the layoff stats in just Silicon Valley.

As to the financial companies–until this market bust each and every one of them provided a service that folks were happy with unlike the auto companies who people have been shunning for decades. Personally I have been against those bailouts also.

patrick neid on December 8, 2008 at 7:57 PM

Here’s a prediction–even with bailouts these companies are still going under and they deserve it. Tell me again who bailed out all the internet companies back in 2002-03 with their 100’s of thousands of employees. Go check the layoff stats in just Silicon Valley.

Silicon Valley offshores a lot of its production and doesn’t pose a systemic risk that the failure of the automotive supply chain would. But since we’re talking about Silicon Valley, do you have any idea how many chips and ICs Detroit buys?

rokemronnie on December 8, 2008 at 11:47 PM

Yet Japan’s automakers are not celebrating. Far from it. They are suffering mightily from the same massive decline in auto sales that is killing Detroit. Moreover, the bankruptcy of one or more of the Big Three could create havoc among parts suppliers that sell to Japan’s carmakers; job losses would send more shock waves through the U.S. economy, deepening the recession in what is by far the largest single market for Japanese cars. “What we’re seeing is the 30-foot tsunami that not even Toyota can cope with,” says Tatsuo Yoshida, executive director and senior analyst at UBS Securities Japan.

From Time magazine, hardly Detroit cheerleaders.
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1864667,00.html?xid=feed-yahoo-world

rokemronnie on December 8, 2008 at 11:51 PM

Is it worth it to the Republicans to destroy the US economy to win an election as it was worth it to the Democrats to lose in Iraq in order to win an election?

Would that Republican stance be any less odious than the Democratic party stance against GWB? Or is winning the only consideration anymore?

I would rather try to do the least damage possible and then try to make the best of it. THEN I have the right to finger-point as needed.

{^_^}

herself on December 9, 2008 at 1:48 AM

herself,

It’s mind-boggling how some conservatives and libertarians are such true-believers when it comes to hating organized labor that they’d let the entire economy implode just to get rid of the UAW.

rokemronnie on December 9, 2008 at 1:07 PM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.