<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Has the remaking of conservative infrastructure begun?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/05/has-the-remaking-of-conservative-infrastructure-begun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/05/has-the-remaking-of-conservative-infrastructure-begun/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 14:48:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greatest Hits: Dec. 5, 2008 - Whatever Is Right</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/05/has-the-remaking-of-conservative-infrastructure-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-1862291</link>
		<dc:creator>Greatest Hits: Dec. 5, 2008 - Whatever Is Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 03:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36452#comment-1862291</guid>
		<description>[...] The New Right-roots: Conservatives on Twitter - Ed Morrissey (Hot Air) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The New Right-roots: Conservatives on Twitter &#8211; Ed Morrissey (Hot Air) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Has the remaking of conservative infrastructure begun? &#171; Top Daily Digest Reading</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/05/has-the-remaking-of-conservative-infrastructure-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-1754526</link>
		<dc:creator>Has the remaking of conservative infrastructure begun? &#171; Top Daily Digest Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 14:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36452#comment-1754526</guid>
		<description>[...] Learn more here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Learn more here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I&#8217;m Twittering at Reality Unwound</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/05/has-the-remaking-of-conservative-infrastructure-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-1699388</link>
		<dc:creator>I&#8217;m Twittering at Reality Unwound</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 22:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36452#comment-1699388</guid>
		<description>[...] push to sign up came after reading at Hotair.com about what&#8217;s happening to the Conservative infrastructure. Basically&#8230; it&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] push to sign up came after reading at Hotair.com about what&#8217;s happening to the Conservative infrastructure. Basically&#8230; it&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blacksmith</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/05/has-the-remaking-of-conservative-infrastructure-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-1698571</link>
		<dc:creator>Blacksmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 03:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36452#comment-1698571</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Technology without Principles, and candidates who are clearly on target, on message, is nothing but cheap entertainment, and lousy entertainment at that.
coldwarrior on December 5, 2008 at 1:22 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Agreed.  It won&#039;t matter what tool we use to get out the conservative message if the guy at the top of the ticket is one who&#039;s made his name over the last 10 years figuratively pissing on conservatives and conservative ideas, then tries to tell us on the right that it&#039;s just rain.  Our problem started in NH, when people from the surrounding, leftmost-leaning states were allowed to come in and basically hand-pick a stooge who could be defeated in the fall with minimal effort - because he&#039;d simply keep the Republican base at home.  And if you look at the tabs on exit polling and post-election polls, that&#039;s exactly what happened.  2008 was just 2006 writ large, with the actual conservatives staying home thinking we were unwanted.  It is, of course, our own fault in that we had a handful of almost-conservatives to pull for in the primaries, and those guys split the conservative vote so finely between themselves that it was a virtual lock for Rhinocrat Mac to take the nom, but that simply points to the fact that we need to become more involved at an earlier stage of the game - from local politics on up.  The thing that Done That said at 8:54AM is the only way we can fix this - pure grassroots effort and the hard work that demands.  That&#039;s the kind of thing that I thought we conservatives are supposed to be all about - or did we lose something since the days of Reagan and Goldwater?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Technology without Principles, and candidates who are clearly on target, on message, is nothing but cheap entertainment, and lousy entertainment at that.<br />
coldwarrior on December 5, 2008 at 1:22 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Agreed.  It won&#8217;t matter what tool we use to get out the conservative message if the guy at the top of the ticket is one who&#8217;s made his name over the last 10 years figuratively pissing on conservatives and conservative ideas, then tries to tell us on the right that it&#8217;s just rain.  Our problem started in NH, when people from the surrounding, leftmost-leaning states were allowed to come in and basically hand-pick a stooge who could be defeated in the fall with minimal effort &#8211; because he&#8217;d simply keep the Republican base at home.  And if you look at the tabs on exit polling and post-election polls, that&#8217;s exactly what happened.  2008 was just 2006 writ large, with the actual conservatives staying home thinking we were unwanted.  It is, of course, our own fault in that we had a handful of almost-conservatives to pull for in the primaries, and those guys split the conservative vote so finely between themselves that it was a virtual lock for Rhinocrat Mac to take the nom, but that simply points to the fact that we need to become more involved at an earlier stage of the game &#8211; from local politics on up.  The thing that Done That said at 8:54AM is the only way we can fix this &#8211; pure grassroots effort and the hard work that demands.  That&#8217;s the kind of thing that I thought we conservatives are supposed to be all about &#8211; or did we lose something since the days of Reagan and Goldwater?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Done That</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/05/has-the-remaking-of-conservative-infrastructure-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-1697487</link>
		<dc:creator>Done That</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 13:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36452#comment-1697487</guid>
		<description>The Dems didn&#039;t win due to social networking. It did not substantially increase voter turnout among young people. Twitter is really a small group of people trying to be relevant using 140 characters or less. They impress themselves with their own importance very easily because they can interact with some &quot;name&quot; political folks. They are talking to each other in a vacuum, most voters don&#039;t even know it exists and could care less. Reaching the voter base, informing them of the issues and getting out the vote will require hard work at the precinct level, glib one liners won&#039;t rebuild the party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dems didn&#8217;t win due to social networking. It did not substantially increase voter turnout among young people. Twitter is really a small group of people trying to be relevant using 140 characters or less. They impress themselves with their own importance very easily because they can interact with some &#8220;name&#8221; political folks. They are talking to each other in a vacuum, most voters don&#8217;t even know it exists and could care less. Reaching the voter base, informing them of the issues and getting out the vote will require hard work at the precinct level, glib one liners won&#8217;t rebuild the party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anti-boomer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/05/has-the-remaking-of-conservative-infrastructure-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-1697197</link>
		<dc:creator>anti-boomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 04:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36452#comment-1697197</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Till you have a clear path and track record in regards to your message, worrying about delivery is a waste of time.

Dr. Dog on December 5, 2008 at 4:50 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

why must I agree with this?  to twitter or not to twitter is a dizzying conundrum.  Who is the idiot that thinks all roads to victory flow through twitter and text messages instead of through the fundamentals?  
Are we really supposed to believe that conservatives aren&#039;t using the internet and technology to get their message out? I refuse to believe that a loss equates total incompetence and lack of connection with current trends.
however, I do agree that old idiots should move aside and let the younger generation take the reigns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Till you have a clear path and track record in regards to your message, worrying about delivery is a waste of time.</p>
<p>Dr. Dog on December 5, 2008 at 4:50 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>why must I agree with this?  to twitter or not to twitter is a dizzying conundrum.  Who is the idiot that thinks all roads to victory flow through twitter and text messages instead of through the fundamentals?<br />
Are we really supposed to believe that conservatives aren&#8217;t using the internet and technology to get their message out? I refuse to believe that a loss equates total incompetence and lack of connection with current trends.<br />
however, I do agree that old idiots should move aside and let the younger generation take the reigns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Dog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/05/has-the-remaking-of-conservative-infrastructure-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-1696019</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36452#comment-1696019</guid>
		<description>You can use all the fancy online tools like Twitter you want. But until you have the current crop of &#039;installed&#039; representation walking the talk, all the talking in the world won&#039;t help. 

Till you have a clear path and track record in regards to your message, worrying about delivery is a waste of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can use all the fancy online tools like Twitter you want. But until you have the current crop of &#8216;installed&#8217; representation walking the talk, all the talking in the world won&#8217;t help. </p>
<p>Till you have a clear path and track record in regards to your message, worrying about delivery is a waste of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just A Grunt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/05/has-the-remaking-of-conservative-infrastructure-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-1695711</link>
		<dc:creator>Just A Grunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36452#comment-1695711</guid>
		<description>For those concerned about Republicans attracting younger folks I encourage you to go out this site &lt;a href=&quot;http://thenewrepublicans.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The New Republicans&lt;/a&gt; which has been started by a law student at the mostly hated Univ of GA.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/newrepublicans&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;He is on Twitter also&lt;/a&gt; and creating quite a buzz
I say mostly hated because I am a GA Tech fan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those concerned about Republicans attracting younger folks I encourage you to go out this site <a href="http://thenewrepublicans.net" rel="nofollow">The New Republicans</a> which has been started by a law student at the mostly hated Univ of GA.<br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/newrepublicans" rel="nofollow">He is on Twitter also</a> and creating quite a buzz<br />
I say mostly hated because I am a GA Tech fan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IU_Conservative</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/05/has-the-remaking-of-conservative-infrastructure-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-1695682</link>
		<dc:creator>IU_Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36452#comment-1695682</guid>
		<description>Ed, you guys need to set up a Hot Air fan page on Facebook</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed, you guys need to set up a Hot Air fan page on Facebook</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atwitter About Twitter &#171; Jane Q. Republican</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/05/has-the-remaking-of-conservative-infrastructure-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-1695367</link>
		<dc:creator>Atwitter About Twitter &#171; Jane Q. Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36452#comment-1695367</guid>
		<description>[...]  I haven&#8217;t yet determined if it is of any value to me at all, but the idea of getting on a Top Conservatives list is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  I haven&#8217;t yet determined if it is of any value to me at all, but the idea of getting on a Top Conservatives list is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ex-Democrat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/05/has-the-remaking-of-conservative-infrastructure-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-1695101</link>
		<dc:creator>ex-Democrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36452#comment-1695101</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Good grief. The door of history is closing on your (conservative’s) ass.

indythinker on December 5, 2008 at 11:17 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;


&lt;strong&gt;Ron Paul? Just a guess.
&lt;/strong&gt;

btw, I am definitely with you on the lack of attention to Obama&#039;s Constitutional eligibility.

If this were to be broken (I don&#039;t know if he&#039;s eligible or not, but why don&#039;t we KNOW?), then we are officially no longer a nation of laws. It was debatable before, but &lt;em&gt;no longer&lt;/em&gt; if this happens.

There&#039;s a Pulitzer waiting for someone...Bueller? Anyone?


btw, for the first time in my adult lifetime: I looked at a check that I received from a client yesterday and thought of ways to not tell the government about my income.

To see our future and get a reality check: read &lt;em&gt;Atlas Shrugged&lt;/em&gt; by Ayn Rand. I liked it so much I&#039;m ordering up a hardback copy from my kiddies for X&#039;mas. I want to be able to make notes.

Who is John Galt?


Let&#039;s roll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Good grief. The door of history is closing on your (conservative’s) ass.</p>
<p>indythinker on December 5, 2008 at 11:17 AM</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Ron Paul? Just a guess.<br />
</strong></p>
<p>btw, I am definitely with you on the lack of attention to Obama&#8217;s Constitutional eligibility.</p>
<p>If this were to be broken (I don&#8217;t know if he&#8217;s eligible or not, but why don&#8217;t we KNOW?), then we are officially no longer a nation of laws. It was debatable before, but <em>no longer</em> if this happens.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a Pulitzer waiting for someone&#8230;Bueller? Anyone?</p>
<p>btw, for the first time in my adult lifetime: I looked at a check that I received from a client yesterday and thought of ways to not tell the government about my income.</p>
<p>To see our future and get a reality check: read <em>Atlas Shrugged</em> by Ayn Rand. I liked it so much I&#8217;m ordering up a hardback copy from my kiddies for X&#8217;mas. I want to be able to make notes.</p>
<p>Who is John Galt?</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s roll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romeo13</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/05/has-the-remaking-of-conservative-infrastructure-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-1695085</link>
		<dc:creator>Romeo13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36452#comment-1695085</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;ErikTheRed on December 5, 2008 at 12:12 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Republican party:

Yes, if we just wire up those Deck Chairs on the Titanic, it will solve EVERYTHING!


Want to really get this whole Conservative thing back on track?

We are now the outcasts... we are NOT the Establishment, the Dems are... we need to promote ourselves as REBELS... in the same vein as Washington, and Jefferson, and my fav, Benjamin Franklin.

Next generation is all about Freedom... we just need to equate that with Liberty... because they are NOT HAPPY with the PC status quo.

Slow down the Social Con agenda for awhile... bring back limited government, and the next generation will be conservative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>ErikTheRed on December 5, 2008 at 12:12 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Republican party:</p>
<p>Yes, if we just wire up those Deck Chairs on the Titanic, it will solve EVERYTHING!</p>
<p>Want to really get this whole Conservative thing back on track?</p>
<p>We are now the outcasts&#8230; we are NOT the Establishment, the Dems are&#8230; we need to promote ourselves as REBELS&#8230; in the same vein as Washington, and Jefferson, and my fav, Benjamin Franklin.</p>
<p>Next generation is all about Freedom&#8230; we just need to equate that with Liberty&#8230; because they are NOT HAPPY with the PC status quo.</p>
<p>Slow down the Social Con agenda for awhile&#8230; bring back limited government, and the next generation will be conservative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhodeymark</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/05/has-the-remaking-of-conservative-infrastructure-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-1695077</link>
		<dc:creator>rhodeymark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36452#comment-1695077</guid>
		<description>Hah - &quot;indythinker&quot; thinks being alone is a sign of independence. He/She/It needs to look up &lt;em&gt;obnoxious&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;shunned&lt;/em&gt;  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hah &#8211; &#8220;indythinker&#8221; thinks being alone is a sign of independence. He/She/It needs to look up <em>obnoxious</em> and <em>shunned</em>  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just A Grunt</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/05/has-the-remaking-of-conservative-infrastructure-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-1695009</link>
		<dc:creator>Just A Grunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36452#comment-1695009</guid>
		<description>For me the biggest advantage to Twitter is not so much the ability it has to communicate a message quickly, which is powerful, but rather it makes people aware that the so called Silent Majority ain&#039;t going to stay silent anymore and somebody better pay attention.
Conservatives by their very nature are not the type to show up on the street with fancy signs and slogans and giant puppets while wearing ghastly pink costumes like the liberals do. Tools like Twitter allow interaction but it will remain to be seen if it can be turned into something to influence policy or politicians.
I don&#039;t get tweets on my cell phone, no need for that. I left it just as web program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me the biggest advantage to Twitter is not so much the ability it has to communicate a message quickly, which is powerful, but rather it makes people aware that the so called Silent Majority ain&#8217;t going to stay silent anymore and somebody better pay attention.<br />
Conservatives by their very nature are not the type to show up on the street with fancy signs and slogans and giant puppets while wearing ghastly pink costumes like the liberals do. Tools like Twitter allow interaction but it will remain to be seen if it can be turned into something to influence policy or politicians.<br />
I don&#8217;t get tweets on my cell phone, no need for that. I left it just as web program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It's Vintage, Duh</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/05/has-the-remaking-of-conservative-infrastructure-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-1695003</link>
		<dc:creator>It's Vintage, Duh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36452#comment-1695003</guid>
		<description>If anyone feels the need to follow me on Twitter, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.twitter.com/downtheticket&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here I is&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone feels the need to follow me on Twitter, <a href="http://www.twitter.com/downtheticket" rel="nofollow">here I is</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meltenn</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/05/has-the-remaking-of-conservative-infrastructure-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-1694953</link>
		<dc:creator>meltenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36452#comment-1694953</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;This whole Twitter thing seems to me to be pathetically narcissistic.

“Look at meeee!!!”

pseudonominus on December 5, 2008 at 11:15 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, yes.  But it&#039;s how a whole lot of people under 30 communicate with each other, and receive information on what&#039;s going in the world.  Traditional media just doesn&#039;t cut it anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This whole Twitter thing seems to me to be pathetically narcissistic.</p>
<p>“Look at meeee!!!”</p>
<p>pseudonominus on December 5, 2008 at 11:15 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, yes.  But it&#8217;s how a whole lot of people under 30 communicate with each other, and receive information on what&#8217;s going in the world.  Traditional media just doesn&#8217;t cut it anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ParisParamus</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/05/has-the-remaking-of-conservative-infrastructure-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-1694944</link>
		<dc:creator>ParisParamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36452#comment-1694944</guid>
		<description>I am on Twitter.  I want conservatives to succeed.  But please, other than the convenience/facility of text messages, I don&#039;t see how this is a breakthrough.  Specifically, how many tweets can one sanely, practically follow in a day?  If suddenly dozens or hundreds of people are announcing stuff and/or attempting to communicate with you, nothing will get noticed.  &lt;em&gt;Please tell me why I am mistaken.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am on Twitter.  I want conservatives to succeed.  But please, other than the convenience/facility of text messages, I don&#8217;t see how this is a breakthrough.  Specifically, how many tweets can one sanely, practically follow in a day?  If suddenly dozens or hundreds of people are announcing stuff and/or attempting to communicate with you, nothing will get noticed.  <em>Please tell me why I am mistaken.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mommypundit</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/05/has-the-remaking-of-conservative-infrastructure-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-1694911</link>
		<dc:creator>Mommypundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36452#comment-1694911</guid>
		<description>www.modernconservative.com

(specifically, anystreet.org)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.modernconservative.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.modernconservative.com</a></p>
<p>(specifically, anystreet.org)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seanhackbarth</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/05/has-the-remaking-of-conservative-infrastructure-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-1694883</link>
		<dc:creator>seanhackbarth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36452#comment-1694883</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;ErikTheRed on December 5, 2008 at 12:03 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There are good eCampaign people at the RNC, but I&#039;m pretty sure they don&#039;t see Twitter as a magic bullet. I bet they&#039;re watching to see how it turns out. The Twitter phenomenon is powerful because it&#039;s organized from the grassroots.

The Twitter effort is about building a communications infrastructure needed to compete with the Left. Without such an infrastructure good messages (which are sorely needed) won&#039;t be communicated. When it comes to communications vs. message it&#039;s not either/or it&#039;s both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>ErikTheRed on December 5, 2008 at 12:03 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>There are good eCampaign people at the RNC, but I&#8217;m pretty sure they don&#8217;t see Twitter as a magic bullet. I bet they&#8217;re watching to see how it turns out. The Twitter phenomenon is powerful because it&#8217;s organized from the grassroots.</p>
<p>The Twitter effort is about building a communications infrastructure needed to compete with the Left. Without such an infrastructure good messages (which are sorely needed) won&#8217;t be communicated. When it comes to communications vs. message it&#8217;s not either/or it&#8217;s both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coldwarrior</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/05/has-the-remaking-of-conservative-infrastructure-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-1694871</link>
		<dc:creator>coldwarrior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36452#comment-1694871</guid>
		<description>In this county in the recent election, two-thirds of the elected offices were uncontested Democrats, and in this state, too many state positions were uncontested.

Twitter?  I&#039;m in a lather.  I passed twittering a long long time ago.  Uncontested?  Says a lot about the ossified GOP organization in this state.

Get back to the basics...nail down the Principles...curry, select, promote, raise up candidates who have shown by their actions they understand the basics, the Principles, and are more than willing to walk the talk.

Then...get the message out, daily, several times a day, long long before the election cycle starts to ratchet up...base all of it on simple basic Principles.  Cull our ranks of those who claim to be GOP or Conservative and act like they are direct from the salons of the Dem fiefdom.  Broke no stupid antics, either, among GOP candidates.  Have a GOP candidate running in your district who can&#039;t keep his fly closed? End his candidacy immediately.  Put in a replacement who actually walks the talk.  Same with those who live on earmarks and spend too much time with lobbyists instead of their constituents.

Then, we can scrap the mimeographs, adapt to more pervasive technologies, and start winning at the local and state level and along the way claw our way back to the national level.

Technology without Principles, and candidates who are clearly on target, on message, is nothing but cheap entertainment, and lousy entertainment at that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this county in the recent election, two-thirds of the elected offices were uncontested Democrats, and in this state, too many state positions were uncontested.</p>
<p>Twitter?  I&#8217;m in a lather.  I passed twittering a long long time ago.  Uncontested?  Says a lot about the ossified GOP organization in this state.</p>
<p>Get back to the basics&#8230;nail down the Principles&#8230;curry, select, promote, raise up candidates who have shown by their actions they understand the basics, the Principles, and are more than willing to walk the talk.</p>
<p>Then&#8230;get the message out, daily, several times a day, long long before the election cycle starts to ratchet up&#8230;base all of it on simple basic Principles.  Cull our ranks of those who claim to be GOP or Conservative and act like they are direct from the salons of the Dem fiefdom.  Broke no stupid antics, either, among GOP candidates.  Have a GOP candidate running in your district who can&#8217;t keep his fly closed? End his candidacy immediately.  Put in a replacement who actually walks the talk.  Same with those who live on earmarks and spend too much time with lobbyists instead of their constituents.</p>
<p>Then, we can scrap the mimeographs, adapt to more pervasive technologies, and start winning at the local and state level and along the way claw our way back to the national level.</p>
<p>Technology without Principles, and candidates who are clearly on target, on message, is nothing but cheap entertainment, and lousy entertainment at that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aero</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/05/has-the-remaking-of-conservative-infrastructure-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-1694869</link>
		<dc:creator>aero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36452#comment-1694869</guid>
		<description>Twitter and other social networking tools are just that -- TOOLS. If your impression is that 95% of users are using the tools for superficial, inane pratter, that&#039;s fine. But recognize that it&#039;s the current dominant users are are superficial, not the tools themselves. Don&#039;t write off what can be a free, effective way to rebuild confidence and interest in the conservative &quot;brand.&quot; Twitter can be incredibly useful and powerful; I&#039;ve seen it used substantively for good causes several times.

Plus, remember that the voters who decide elections are the uninformed, superficial types you so deride. WE didn&#039;t decide the election -- the highly informed, plugged-in partisan types are always solidly on one side or the other. Obama won because Facebookers and Twitterers thought he was cool. Obama lovers were incredibly active and effective on Facebook. We can&#039;t and shouldn&#039;t cede that battlefield because we see ourselves as intellectually above it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter and other social networking tools are just that &#8212; TOOLS. If your impression is that 95% of users are using the tools for superficial, inane pratter, that&#8217;s fine. But recognize that it&#8217;s the current dominant users are are superficial, not the tools themselves. Don&#8217;t write off what can be a free, effective way to rebuild confidence and interest in the conservative &#8220;brand.&#8221; Twitter can be incredibly useful and powerful; I&#8217;ve seen it used substantively for good causes several times.</p>
<p>Plus, remember that the voters who decide elections are the uninformed, superficial types you so deride. WE didn&#8217;t decide the election &#8212; the highly informed, plugged-in partisan types are always solidly on one side or the other. Obama won because Facebookers and Twitterers thought he was cool. Obama lovers were incredibly active and effective on Facebook. We can&#8217;t and shouldn&#8217;t cede that battlefield because we see ourselves as intellectually above it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/05/has-the-remaking-of-conservative-infrastructure-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-1694840</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36452#comment-1694840</guid>
		<description>At first I thought Twitter was interesting. Now, I think it is obnoxious and a waste of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first I thought Twitter was interesting. Now, I think it is obnoxious and a waste of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: irishspy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/05/has-the-remaking-of-conservative-infrastructure-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-1694819</link>
		<dc:creator>irishspy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36452#comment-1694819</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t say I&#039;ve been impressed with Twitter: it seems the most superficial of all social networking sites.

But, if it works....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t say I&#8217;ve been impressed with Twitter: it seems the most superficial of all social networking sites.</p>
<p>But, if it works&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philwynk</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/05/has-the-remaking-of-conservative-infrastructure-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-1694809</link>
		<dc:creator>philwynk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36452#comment-1694809</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;First you have to remold every college kid’s brain from its present leftist bent to a rightist bent. Good luck with that one.

keep the change on December 5, 2008 at 11:14 AM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So long as the Left keeps a lock on public education, we&#039;re all in the proverbial handbasket, rolling quickly into a very real hell.

Vouchers now. No more waiting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>First you have to remold every college kid’s brain from its present leftist bent to a rightist bent. Good luck with that one.</p>
<p>keep the change on December 5, 2008 at 11:14 AM
</p></blockquote>
<p>So long as the Left keeps a lock on public education, we&#8217;re all in the proverbial handbasket, rolling quickly into a very real hell.</p>
<p>Vouchers now. No more waiting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aero</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/05/has-the-remaking-of-conservative-infrastructure-begun/comment-page-1/#comment-1694802</link>
		<dc:creator>aero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36452#comment-1694802</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Why don’t we just post lolcats for the completely illiterate?

dinobalz on December 5, 2008 at 12:34 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sadly, I think it would win us back a significant portion of the youth vote if we did that. I&#039;m totally not kidding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why don’t we just post lolcats for the completely illiterate?</p>
<p>dinobalz on December 5, 2008 at 12:34 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Sadly, I think it would win us back a significant portion of the youth vote if we did that. I&#8217;m totally not kidding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
