Harper outboxes the opposition
posted at 2:00 pm on December 4, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
With the three opposition parties attempting to override the plurality of Conservatives in Parliament, Canadian Prime Minister fought back by forcing an adjournment of Parliament until the end of January. Governor-General Michaelle Jean approved Harper’s request to adjourn in advance of any confidence motion, keeping the government in Conservative control and essentially locking the three parties out of policy for the next two months:
Gov. Gen. Michaelle Jean has approved Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s request to suspend Parliament, agreeing to put the government on hold until the end of January.
Harper addressed the media at just before noon after about two-and-a-half hours of meetings at Rideau Hall.
“Following my advice, the Governor General has agreed to prorogue Parliament,” Harper told reporters from the front steps of the building. …
Harper also said that when Parliament resumes, the first item on the agenda will be the presentation of the federal budget and he will spend his time working almost exclusively between now and then on the fiscal blueprint.
That was not Harper’s final card, either. Had Jean refused his request, Harper could have applied to the Queen of Great Britain, Canada’s nominal head of state, to replace Jean with another Governor-General. Jean avoided that national crisis and at the same time avoided another national election less than two months after Canada’s last election gave the Conservatives a greater plurality but just short of a majority.
The big issue in this supposedly centers on the lack of a government stimulus/bailout package, but may cut closer to home among politicians. Harper wants to end government subsidies for political parties, forcing them to rely on private donations alone. The Conservatives excel at fundraising, while the other parties rely more heavily on the subsidies. Harper’s new economic package was expected to include that change, which is why the Liberals, NDP, and Bloc Quebecois tried to act in advance of its submission.
The opposition alliance may be glad it won’t have to face the voters in any case. They gave a demonstration of their competence yesterday:
The Liberals have apologized for Liberal Leader Stephane Dion’s taped televised address, after it was delivered to Canadian networks almost an hour past deadline and in near-cellphone quality.
“I apologize for what happened tonight. I apologize for the poor quality and the lateness. I am livid and am doing an investigation as to how this happened,” Johanne Senecal, Dion’s Chief of Staff, said to CTV News tonight.
Dion was supposed to deliver the networks a pre-taped statement to the nation Wednesday between 6:15 p.m. and 6:30 ET. It was to air after Prime Minister Stephen Harper addressed the country at 7 p.m. ET about the political crisis on Parliament Hill.
CTV, along with other major Canadian networks, pre-empted regularly scheduled programming to deliver the addresses. Harper went to air shortly after 7 p.m. but networks were left scrambling to fill airspace when Dion’s tape was nowhere to be found.
No wonder they need public subsidies.
Update: My friend and thoughtful liberal Michael Stickings, who blogs in Canada at The Reaction, thinks Jean took the easy way out:
I hesitate to call the governor general, Michaëlle Jean, a coward, but her decision, I think, was a poor one. Either she should have dissolved Parliament and called an election, or she should have given the coalition, which holds a majority of the seats in the House, the chance to govern. Instead, in granting Harper’s request, she has gone along with what the Conservatives want, parliamentary democracy be damned, and given them the upper hand in terms of the campaign to come. Basically, she has saved Harper’s sorry bacon, evidently putting his interests before the interests of the country.
It is a sad day for Canada.
I don’t entirely disagree here, but part of that is the opposition’s fault. The proper way to have proceeded is to use the no-confidence motion to proceed to a new election. The last election was just seven weeks ago, though, and the three opposition parties had a difficult time coming up with a good reason for another one now when the voters made their intent plain less than two months ago. Instead, they wanted to take an (almost) unprecendented step to force the plurality party into opposition. Under those circumstances, Jean acted in the most rational way possible.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
Not when you’re trading punches in the ring and the other guy clocks you right between the eyes. Or three guys ambush you and you use your muscle to fend them off.
Ed’s use of “Checkmate” nothwithstanding…
RD on December 5, 2008 at 3:21 AM
I would also say look at the crap which goes on the with American elections. Each state having its own rules (Not that their is anything. The right to vote mitigating the most basic requirement to check eligibility.
davod on December 5, 2008 at 5:16 AM
Sorry:
Should read – I would also say look at the crap which goes on the with American elections. Each state having its own rules, not that there is anything particularly wrong woth thi but it does lead to inconsistencies. The right to vote mitigating the most basic requirement to check eligibility.
Some of the practices`found in the USA would be attacked as vote rigging in less advanced societies.
davod on December 5, 2008 at 5:20 AM
Yeah, it’s always a good idea to base an idiotic opinion on here say.
What a slap in the face to those who have supported you during these last 8 years.
Fuck you.
You-Eh-Vee on December 5, 2008 at 8:50 AM
This is idiotic. Canada is one of the few countries to be taking real casualties and killing the real bad guys in the war in Afghanistan. I was in Canada on 9/11 (and still am) and opinion was overwhelmingly in favour on the U.S. Canada is not anti-American, but idiotic, uninformed, uneducated, ignorant and moronic comments like yours will be sure to change a few minds.
batman on December 5, 2008 at 11:13 AM
And an analogy for leftie trolls:
andycanuck on December 5, 2008 at 12:01 PM
I disagree with this for the following reason: she’s not elected by anyone. She has never stood for election and has received not a single vote by any Canadian.
So: she has this sinecure. Fine.
But don’t think. She is not paid to think. Her opinions are of interest only to the same extent anyone else’s are…any attempt to actually use the power she has on paper is illegitimate.
So, while Harper says that she followed his “advice”, what it comes down to is that she has to do what she is told.
Blaise on December 5, 2008 at 4:12 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2