<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What does the Chambliss blowout victory mean?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/03/what-does-the-chambliss-blowout-victory-mean/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/03/what-does-the-chambliss-blowout-victory-mean/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:27:50 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sethstorm</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/03/what-does-the-chambliss-blowout-victory-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1691520</link>
		<dc:creator>sethstorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 12:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36250#comment-1691520</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
When the VERY SAME people that got us into all the financial mess, Dodd, Wrangle, Reid, Frank keep getting elected by idiots in “blue” bankrupt, worthless, union thug run, welfare States, with a LOWER approval rating then Bush
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Try saying that to the citizens of Ohio and how they approve their representatives at the state and national levels.  To add to that, I am proud that Ohio is not a RTW state and has maintained that status.  

By the way, for those union-hostile Palin fans: Explain what her husband is with reference to his union membership?  How was it referenced in her introduction in Ohio?  Or do you just want to be comfortable that she drives the riff-raff mad?

&lt;blockquote&gt;
 The “rust belt” poorly run States that could even consider Franken show the foolish radical people put SELF above Country…
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Never mind what is said about economic &lt;i&gt;self&lt;/i&gt;-interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
When the VERY SAME people that got us into all the financial mess, Dodd, Wrangle, Reid, Frank keep getting elected by idiots in “blue” bankrupt, worthless, union thug run, welfare States, with a LOWER approval rating then Bush
</p></blockquote>
<p>Try saying that to the citizens of Ohio and how they approve their representatives at the state and national levels.  To add to that, I am proud that Ohio is not a RTW state and has maintained that status.  </p>
<p>By the way, for those union-hostile Palin fans: Explain what her husband is with reference to his union membership?  How was it referenced in her introduction in Ohio?  Or do you just want to be comfortable that she drives the riff-raff mad?</p>
<blockquote><p>
 The “rust belt” poorly run States that could even consider Franken show the foolish radical people put SELF above Country…
</p></blockquote>
<p>Never mind what is said about economic <i>self</i>-interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: There's My Two Cents</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/03/what-does-the-chambliss-blowout-victory-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1691251</link>
		<dc:creator>There's My Two Cents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 04:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36250#comment-1691251</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Senate Update...&lt;/strong&gt;

The key stake in this election was a 60-seat Democrat majority in the Senate.  That will not happen now.  A run-off in Georgia has seen Rep Saxby Chambliss beat Dem Jim Martin by 16 points, and Minnesota Rep Norm Coleman remains slightly ahead of Dem.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Senate Update&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The key stake in this election was a 60-seat Democrat majority in the Senate.  That will not happen now.  A run-off in Georgia has seen Rep Saxby Chambliss beat Dem Jim Martin by 16 points, and Minnesota Rep Norm Coleman remains slightly ahead of Dem&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamson64</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/03/what-does-the-chambliss-blowout-victory-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1690873</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamson64</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36250#comment-1690873</guid>
		<description>You can tell Mr &lt;strong&gt;Nonfactor&lt;/strong&gt;

is bothered by this BLOWOUT. It was not just a win.

30% of Georgia is Black and the Dem still got blown away.

Nonfactor you know this means  Obama&#039;s victory not near as big as you thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can tell Mr <strong>Nonfactor</strong></p>
<p>is bothered by this BLOWOUT. It was not just a win.</p>
<p>30% of Georgia is Black and the Dem still got blown away.</p>
<p>Nonfactor you know this means  Obama&#8217;s victory not near as big as you thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everything but the kitchen sink : Pursuing Holiness</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/03/what-does-the-chambliss-blowout-victory-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1690393</link>
		<dc:creator>Everything but the kitchen sink : Pursuing Holiness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36250#comment-1690393</guid>
		<description>[...] Democrats have been denied a filibuster-proof majority.  I&#8217;m almost disappointed, because now - aided and abetted by the media - they will blame [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Democrats have been denied a filibuster-proof majority.  I&#8217;m almost disappointed, because now &#8211; aided and abetted by the media &#8211; they will blame [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buy Danish</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/03/what-does-the-chambliss-blowout-victory-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1690373</link>
		<dc:creator>Buy Danish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36250#comment-1690373</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Of course, one could also speculate that Republicans had a lot more motivation for turning out in this election to preserve the filibuster, a firebreak against the excesses of one-party governance. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s easier to speculate that the vast majority of Obama/Martin voters don&#039;t have a clue about filibusters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Of course, one could also speculate that Republicans had a lot more motivation for turning out in this election to preserve the filibuster, a firebreak against the excesses of one-party governance. </p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s easier to speculate that the vast majority of Obama/Martin voters don&#8217;t have a clue about filibusters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelechy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/03/what-does-the-chambliss-blowout-victory-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1690041</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36250#comment-1690041</guid>
		<description>NONBREAKING - Nonfactor still doesn&#039;t factor.

p.s. you really wanted to say &quot;racist state&quot;, not Southern.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NONBREAKING &#8211; Nonfactor still doesn&#8217;t factor.</p>
<p>p.s. you really wanted to say &#8220;racist state&#8221;, not Southern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nonfactor</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/03/what-does-the-chambliss-blowout-victory-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1690032</link>
		<dc:creator>Nonfactor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36250#comment-1690032</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;BREAKING NEWS: Republican Wins Reelection in Southern State, People Read Way Too Much Into It&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>BREAKING NEWS: Republican Wins Reelection in Southern State, People Read Way Too Much Into It</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hillbillyjim</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/03/what-does-the-chambliss-blowout-victory-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1689984</link>
		<dc:creator>hillbillyjim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 18:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36250#comment-1689984</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe we need to read too much into the Chambliss victory. 

2010 will be decided on the dominant issues of the day, whatever they may be. Will the top issue still be the economy? ...environmental nuttery? ...or a new external threat? ...or something else not in focus at the present?
Who knows?

&lt;blockquote&gt;All that’s left is to prick Franken. &lt;strong&gt;Or is that redundant?
&lt;/strong&gt;
locomotivebreath1901 on December 3, 2008 at 11:35 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe we need to read too much into the Chambliss victory. </p>
<p>2010 will be decided on the dominant issues of the day, whatever they may be. Will the top issue still be the economy? &#8230;environmental nuttery? &#8230;or a new external threat? &#8230;or something else not in focus at the present?<br />
Who knows?</p>
<blockquote><p>All that’s left is to prick Franken. <strong>Or is that redundant?<br />
</strong><br />
locomotivebreath1901 on December 3, 2008 at 11:35 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CommentGuy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/03/what-does-the-chambliss-blowout-victory-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1689890</link>
		<dc:creator>CommentGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 18:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36250#comment-1689890</guid>
		<description>The ratio of victory was almost a match for the Bush/Kerry race.

Turnout was near what is expected for a run off election.

Some suggested it was lack of interest for black voters to turn out for a white candidate.

If the Obama voter email lists for Georgia and the GOTV effort were used like in the General it would have been close again.

With the low turnout a few heavy Black counties like Dekalb and Fulton ,which make up Atlanta area, could have made the race much closer.

Simply the only reason for the run off to start with was that the Obama supporters were already in the voting booth and went for a straight Dem ticket. Otherwise they race likely would have been decided then by getting over the required 50% of the vote.

It also lends weight to the fact that Obama may not have very long coat tails as he drops items from his agenda and even fails to perform up to some groups expectation.

A spreadsheet with some calculations of the results is available &lt;a href=&quot;http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=py9VmOV0zfQEqdf3cKqeUDA&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ratio of victory was almost a match for the Bush/Kerry race.</p>
<p>Turnout was near what is expected for a run off election.</p>
<p>Some suggested it was lack of interest for black voters to turn out for a white candidate.</p>
<p>If the Obama voter email lists for Georgia and the GOTV effort were used like in the General it would have been close again.</p>
<p>With the low turnout a few heavy Black counties like Dekalb and Fulton ,which make up Atlanta area, could have made the race much closer.</p>
<p>Simply the only reason for the run off to start with was that the Obama supporters were already in the voting booth and went for a straight Dem ticket. Otherwise they race likely would have been decided then by getting over the required 50% of the vote.</p>
<p>It also lends weight to the fact that Obama may not have very long coat tails as he drops items from his agenda and even fails to perform up to some groups expectation.</p>
<p>A spreadsheet with some calculations of the results is available <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=py9VmOV0zfQEqdf3cKqeUDA" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aceinstall</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/03/what-does-the-chambliss-blowout-victory-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1689856</link>
		<dc:creator>aceinstall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 18:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36250#comment-1689856</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Tommy_G on December 3, 2008 at 10:07 AM

Maybe you &quot;real conservatives&quot; should stop inviting other folks into your big tent, It sounds like all you want us for is to vote the way you tell me to and then shut up and bring you another beer. I&#039;ve registered as an independent for the last 24 years, give me GOOD ideas and leadership and I don&#039;t care if you have an R or D next to your name. And by the way, for all of you that complain about Collins and Snowe, either one is far better then FAR LEFT Tom Allen who is now out of a job in the house of rep. because he lost running against Collins. Elitism sucks, from both sides.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Tommy_G on December 3, 2008 at 10:07 AM</p>
<p>Maybe you &#8220;real conservatives&#8221; should stop inviting other folks into your big tent, It sounds like all you want us for is to vote the way you tell me to and then shut up and bring you another beer. I&#8217;ve registered as an independent for the last 24 years, give me GOOD ideas and leadership and I don&#8217;t care if you have an R or D next to your name. And by the way, for all of you that complain about Collins and Snowe, either one is far better then FAR LEFT Tom Allen who is now out of a job in the house of rep. because he lost running against Collins. Elitism sucks, from both sides.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hope P. Muntz</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/03/what-does-the-chambliss-blowout-victory-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1689705</link>
		<dc:creator>Hope P. Muntz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 17:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36250#comment-1689705</guid>
		<description>This was a victory for only one person: Sarah Palin.

It&#039;s her party now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a victory for only one person: Sarah Palin.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s her party now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay12</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/03/what-does-the-chambliss-blowout-victory-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1689663</link>
		<dc:creator>jay12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 17:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36250#comment-1689663</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;All that the GOP has to do is field a real conservative and they win. 

thomasaur on December 3, 2008 at 11:07 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Good luck with that.  There are about 3 people left in the United States who know what a &quot;real conservative&quot; is.  And none of them are Republicans.  The GOP is flled with sniveling cowards.  They&#039;ll talk like tough guys on here just to get somebody&#039;s attention, but put these tough guys out there, and it&#039;s nothing but waffle and betrayal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>All that the GOP has to do is field a real conservative and they win. </p>
<p>thomasaur on December 3, 2008 at 11:07 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Good luck with that.  There are about 3 people left in the United States who know what a &#8220;real conservative&#8221; is.  And none of them are Republicans.  The GOP is flled with sniveling cowards.  They&#8217;ll talk like tough guys on here just to get somebody&#8217;s attention, but put these tough guys out there, and it&#8217;s nothing but waffle and betrayal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Palin Delivers for Chambliss in GA&#8230; : P.U.M.A</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/03/what-does-the-chambliss-blowout-victory-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1689610</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Palin Delivers for Chambliss in GA&#8230; : P.U.M.A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36250#comment-1689610</guid>
		<description>[...] is definitely bound for the White House&#8230; Incidentally, why didn&#8217;t Obama campaign for Jim Martin, thereby preventing a humiliating defeat? Could it be because he only cares [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is definitely bound for the White House&#8230; Incidentally, why didn&#8217;t Obama campaign for Jim Martin, thereby preventing a humiliating defeat? Could it be because he only cares [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angry Dumbo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/03/what-does-the-chambliss-blowout-victory-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1689582</link>
		<dc:creator>Angry Dumbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36250#comment-1689582</guid>
		<description>From taxes to Gitmo, Obama is tacking hard to the center to pull the wool over the sheeps eyes.  He stumbles on the auto bailout, however.   The problem is not with the companies, but with the bailouts.  Failing companies need to fail, bankruptcy which is good enough for individuals should be good enough for corporations of all sizes.  

The auto bailout is a poorly disguised payback to the unions that supported Obama.  Most workers are non-union and most healthy companies are also non-union.  Blind faith in union leadership has hurt employees and it will also hurt Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From taxes to Gitmo, Obama is tacking hard to the center to pull the wool over the sheeps eyes.  He stumbles on the auto bailout, however.   The problem is not with the companies, but with the bailouts.  Failing companies need to fail, bankruptcy which is good enough for individuals should be good enough for corporations of all sizes.  </p>
<p>The auto bailout is a poorly disguised payback to the unions that supported Obama.  Most workers are non-union and most healthy companies are also non-union.  Blind faith in union leadership has hurt employees and it will also hurt Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: technopeasant</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/03/what-does-the-chambliss-blowout-victory-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1689574</link>
		<dc:creator>technopeasant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36250#comment-1689574</guid>
		<description>Here are 10 slogans or watchwords that illustrate what may have happened last night: 1)&#039;the shot heard round the world 2) like the Doolittle raid, it didn&#039;t win the war but it did show that Japan wasn&#039;t invincible 3)one small step for the GOP but one large leap of faith for Sarah Palin 4)Rome wasn&#039;t built in a day 5)the die is cast, we have crossed the Rubicon-Sarah Palin is the de facto leader of the GOP 6)when one door closes another one opens (the disappointment of November 4th but then the opportunity to showcase the talent of Sarah Palin) 7)the GOP has temporarily plugged up the breach 8)&#039;a journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step&#039; (Confucius)9)&quot;Home, I go home (conservative roots)And I&#039;ll think of some way of getting him (the control of Congress and the WH) back. After all...tomorrow is another day.&quot; Gone With The Wind 10)&quot;Victory, however long and hard the road may be, for without victory there is no survival (of the GOP)...I will take up my task in buoyancy and hope. I feel sure that our cause will not be suffered to fail among men. I feel entitled at his juncture, at this time, to claim the aid of all (thoughts of Sarah Palin) and to say, &quot;Come then, let us go forward together with our united strength.&quot; Winston Churchill May 13, 1940</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are 10 slogans or watchwords that illustrate what may have happened last night: 1)&#8217;the shot heard round the world 2) like the Doolittle raid, it didn&#8217;t win the war but it did show that Japan wasn&#8217;t invincible 3)one small step for the GOP but one large leap of faith for Sarah Palin 4)Rome wasn&#8217;t built in a day 5)the die is cast, we have crossed the Rubicon-Sarah Palin is the de facto leader of the GOP 6)when one door closes another one opens (the disappointment of November 4th but then the opportunity to showcase the talent of Sarah Palin) 7)the GOP has temporarily plugged up the breach 8)&#8217;a journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step&#8217; (Confucius)9)&#8221;Home, I go home (conservative roots)And I&#8217;ll think of some way of getting him (the control of Congress and the WH) back. After all&#8230;tomorrow is another day.&#8221; Gone With The Wind 10)&#8221;Victory, however long and hard the road may be, for without victory there is no survival (of the GOP)&#8230;I will take up my task in buoyancy and hope. I feel sure that our cause will not be suffered to fail among men. I feel entitled at his juncture, at this time, to claim the aid of all (thoughts of Sarah Palin) and to say, &#8220;Come then, let us go forward together with our united strength.&#8221; Winston Churchill May 13, 1940</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wildcat84</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/03/what-does-the-chambliss-blowout-victory-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1689561</link>
		<dc:creator>wildcat84</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36250#comment-1689561</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t necessarily rule out Reid doing the nuclear option.

It&#039;d put him at 59, and he knows he can count on at least one RINO like Collins or Snowe. So while he might not technically have 60 votes, he will de facto have them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t necessarily rule out Reid doing the nuclear option.</p>
<p>It&#8217;d put him at 59, and he knows he can count on at least one RINO like Collins or Snowe. So while he might not technically have 60 votes, he will de facto have them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: locomotivebreath1901</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/03/what-does-the-chambliss-blowout-victory-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1689539</link>
		<dc:creator>locomotivebreath1901</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36250#comment-1689539</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The nutroots have come to realize that Obama pulled a hat pin from center right, and popped the air out of their swoon balloon.&lt;/strong&gt;

All that&#039;s left is to prick Franken. Or is that redundant?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The nutroots have come to realize that Obama pulled a hat pin from center right, and popped the air out of their swoon balloon.</strong></p>
<p>All that&#8217;s left is to prick Franken. Or is that redundant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vashta.Nerada</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/03/what-does-the-chambliss-blowout-victory-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1689533</link>
		<dc:creator>Vashta.Nerada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36250#comment-1689533</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If Reid had a shot at 60, he might have interceded on Franken’s behalf by invoking the Senate’s authority to decide the election.  Without that motivation, Reid will almost certainly avoid such heavy-handed tactics, especially since &lt;em&gt;Republicans could now bring the Senate to a standstill over it&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
The republicans should do that anyway, so there is a country to fix in 2011.  It sure won&#039;t hurt, as the dems did it in 2005, and won majorities from their efforts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If Reid had a shot at 60, he might have interceded on Franken’s behalf by invoking the Senate’s authority to decide the election.  Without that motivation, Reid will almost certainly avoid such heavy-handed tactics, especially since <em>Republicans could now bring the Senate to a standstill over it</em>.</p></blockquote>
<p>The republicans should do that anyway, so there is a country to fix in 2011.  It sure won&#8217;t hurt, as the dems did it in 2005, and won majorities from their efforts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoDonkey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/03/what-does-the-chambliss-blowout-victory-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1689524</link>
		<dc:creator>NoDonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36250#comment-1689524</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Frankly, not a damn thing. You’ll still see a filibuster-proof Harry Reid-led Dem majority, since the Dems seem to be able to keep their members in line.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That might have been true when it didn&#039;t mean as much, but if the Congress tries to go far left, Democrats in the House especially won&#039;t be able to portray themselves as &quot;conservative Democrats&quot; any longer.  

The public is going to see (if they pay attention), that there is no such thing as a conservative Democrat, there are only corrupt, incompetent and worthless Democrat politicians.  

My prediction is the Democrats will lose both Houses in 2010.  Pelosi and Gambino errand boy Reid are both complete idiots who have no idea what it is that they are doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Frankly, not a damn thing. You’ll still see a filibuster-proof Harry Reid-led Dem majority, since the Dems seem to be able to keep their members in line.</p></blockquote>
<p>That might have been true when it didn&#8217;t mean as much, but if the Congress tries to go far left, Democrats in the House especially won&#8217;t be able to portray themselves as &#8220;conservative Democrats&#8221; any longer.  </p>
<p>The public is going to see (if they pay attention), that there is no such thing as a conservative Democrat, there are only corrupt, incompetent and worthless Democrat politicians.  </p>
<p>My prediction is the Democrats will lose both Houses in 2010.  Pelosi and Gambino errand boy Reid are both complete idiots who have no idea what it is that they are doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thuja</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/03/what-does-the-chambliss-blowout-victory-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1689519</link>
		<dc:creator>thuja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36250#comment-1689519</guid>
		<description>One thing that the Chambliss victory did &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; mean is that Sarah Palin is the new Messiah.  Chambliss would have won with or without her.  Republicans were more motivated to come out to the polls out of fear of a Democratic supermajority and many Democratic voters are leary of giving their party too much power.  While perhaps the average voter is not sophisticated as I am to say that sixty Senators of the same party is their greatest political fear, they do understand that either political party left unchecked is going to lead to disaster.  Or at least they tend to vote that way.  

It&#039;s just not that the statement about the effect of Palin are overstated, they are unseemly.  They are why many people become Democrats.  They see absolutely lunatic &quot;conservative&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F%C3%BChrerprinzip&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;fuhrerprinzip&lt;/a&gt; when they are in high school or college, and they become Democrats.  I was one such kid and I still meet such youngsters.  

Of course, the obvious reply to me is what about Obamessiah?  The Obama worship phenomenon should have made more kids cynical about him.  I think for many kids, it&#039;s not so much Obama himself--as the support for Obama it their way of atoning for the historical sin of racism.  Voting for Obama was atonement like Christian Lent or Jewish Yom Kippur, but with the joy of Mardi Gras or the breaking of the fast after Yom Kippur.  Kids like to be given &quot;get out guilt, cheaply&quot; cards.  I only hope that we have to atone for the sin of our father&#039;s and mother&#039;s racism once.  (If we are to be truly feminist, let our mothers bear some of the ancestral sin.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that the Chambliss victory did <em>not</em> mean is that Sarah Palin is the new Messiah.  Chambliss would have won with or without her.  Republicans were more motivated to come out to the polls out of fear of a Democratic supermajority and many Democratic voters are leary of giving their party too much power.  While perhaps the average voter is not sophisticated as I am to say that sixty Senators of the same party is their greatest political fear, they do understand that either political party left unchecked is going to lead to disaster.  Or at least they tend to vote that way.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s just not that the statement about the effect of Palin are overstated, they are unseemly.  They are why many people become Democrats.  They see absolutely lunatic &#8220;conservative&#8221; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F%C3%BChrerprinzip" rel="nofollow">fuhrerprinzip</a> when they are in high school or college, and they become Democrats.  I was one such kid and I still meet such youngsters.  </p>
<p>Of course, the obvious reply to me is what about Obamessiah?  The Obama worship phenomenon should have made more kids cynical about him.  I think for many kids, it&#8217;s not so much Obama himself&#8211;as the support for Obama it their way of atoning for the historical sin of racism.  Voting for Obama was atonement like Christian Lent or Jewish Yom Kippur, but with the joy of Mardi Gras or the breaking of the fast after Yom Kippur.  Kids like to be given &#8220;get out guilt, cheaply&#8221; cards.  I only hope that we have to atone for the sin of our father&#8217;s and mother&#8217;s racism once.  (If we are to be truly feminist, let our mothers bear some of the ancestral sin.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vashta.Nerada</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/03/what-does-the-chambliss-blowout-victory-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1689518</link>
		<dc:creator>Vashta.Nerada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36250#comment-1689518</guid>
		<description>It means that about 8 million conservatives are wishing they had held their noses and voted on the 4th.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It means that about 8 million conservatives are wishing they had held their noses and voted on the 4th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ToddonCapeCod</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/03/what-does-the-chambliss-blowout-victory-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1689511</link>
		<dc:creator>ToddonCapeCod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36250#comment-1689511</guid>
		<description>Could it be that Obama didn&#039;t campaign for Martin because he doesn&#039;t want a filibuster proof majority, in order to blame Republicans for anything that goes wrong? 
That theory is out there... but, if its so, where is the call for Franken to throw in the towel?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could it be that Obama didn&#8217;t campaign for Martin because he doesn&#8217;t want a filibuster proof majority, in order to blame Republicans for anything that goes wrong?<br />
That theory is out there&#8230; but, if its so, where is the call for Franken to throw in the towel?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/03/what-does-the-chambliss-blowout-victory-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1689505</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36250#comment-1689505</guid>
		<description>I have hope for the future, and in part it&#039;s based on the fact that the same Dem leadership which sunk Congressional popularity polls is still going to anger the population who want LEADERSHIP from their public servants.
Reid and Pelosi have failed the country in gargantuan ways, and now a member of the &#039;do nothing Congress&#039; has been elected President. 
Obama&#039;s pride will not allow him to be remembered as the first FAILED Black President. I don&#039;t think he wants to this generation&#039;s &quot;Jimmy Carter&quot;. I&#039;m not suggesting he will move to the middle, but I do think he will not be a willing co-conspirator to the Dem Congress&#039;s failures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have hope for the future, and in part it&#8217;s based on the fact that the same Dem leadership which sunk Congressional popularity polls is still going to anger the population who want LEADERSHIP from their public servants.<br />
Reid and Pelosi have failed the country in gargantuan ways, and now a member of the &#8216;do nothing Congress&#8217; has been elected President.<br />
Obama&#8217;s pride will not allow him to be remembered as the first FAILED Black President. I don&#8217;t think he wants to this generation&#8217;s &#8220;Jimmy Carter&#8221;. I&#8217;m not suggesting he will move to the middle, but I do think he will not be a willing co-conspirator to the Dem Congress&#8217;s failures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kirkill</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/03/what-does-the-chambliss-blowout-victory-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1689486</link>
		<dc:creator>kirkill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36250#comment-1689486</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; like good portions of his [Franken&#039;s] face have gone numb and he’s struggling to move them.

Lehosh on December 3, 2008 at 10:04 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There are no &lt;em&gt;good portions&lt;/em&gt; of that weenie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> like good portions of his [Franken's] face have gone numb and he’s struggling to move them.</p>
<p>Lehosh on December 3, 2008 at 10:04 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>There are no <em>good portions</em> of that weenie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I R A Darth Aggie</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/12/03/what-does-the-chambliss-blowout-victory-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1689458</link>
		<dc:creator>I R A Darth Aggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=36250#comment-1689458</guid>
		<description>Frankly, not a damn thing. You&#039;ll still see a filibuster-proof Harry Reid-led Dem majority, since the Dems seem to be able to keep their members in line.

The Republicans? not so much. All the Dems have to do is flip a couple of Republicans. Maybe throw a little pork their way, or put them on a plum committee/subcommittee.

I&#039;ve been informed that I should call him &lt;strong&gt;Senator&lt;/strong&gt; Harry &quot;&lt;em&gt;By Any Means Necessary&lt;/em&gt;&quot; Reid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, not a damn thing. You&#8217;ll still see a filibuster-proof Harry Reid-led Dem majority, since the Dems seem to be able to keep their members in line.</p>
<p>The Republicans? not so much. All the Dems have to do is flip a couple of Republicans. Maybe throw a little pork their way, or put them on a plum committee/subcommittee.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been informed that I should call him <strong>Senator</strong> Harry &#8220;<em>By Any Means Necessary</em>&#8221; Reid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
