I’m a solid conservative and listened while Hannity and the rest of his Ilk got their marching orders from the RNC! I’m bored with this act! .…how did that work out for all you FOX Lackeys?

sabbott on December 3, 2008 at 1:01 PM

You sound about as Conservative as Frank Rich.

jp on December 2, 2008 at 5:23 PM

I’m with you. When they start stuttering I just want to scream!

Kondrake annoys me, but I like Krauthammer. Mark Steyn would be a great addition on any show!

Yeah, isn’t the pot calling the kettle black here? But what is he going to do–he only has one joke, “Isn’t Bush stupid? hAHAHAHAH”

Hey, you wrote “Black” so you must be racist. Wait, I wrote black so I must be racist too.

Seriously though I think Stewart has alot of problems and probably realizes it’s all downhill from here. (Well ok, he has one moment left, when he interviews Barry on the show during the first 100 days.) The problem is that he doesn’t want to make fun of the guy or congress and his audience doesn’t want to watch him make fun of him either. Combine this with the fact he’s basically the same age as the dads of a good portion of the audience he has a big problem. (It’s hard to be cool and hip when you’re in your mid 40’s.)

All I hope is KP sticks to her usual. Maybe do her OWN show.. not with Hannity.

I would actually watch that.

Allah.. what do you think? A KP show.. half hour or so?

upinak on December 2, 2008 at 5:30 PM

How about Malkin vs. Powers? I’d watch that.

It’s fun watching Jon when he tries to be even handed and bash liberals. You can tell his heart just isn’t in it.

Well that’s ok, his audience doesn’t want to see it anyway so he has that excuse.

Whoa – not my meaning at all. I was suggesting that watching Stewart and Colbert is about as useful as watching Hannity. No literacy test here.

Just checking. The unprovoked personal attacks get kind of thick here sometimes. :o)

I’m always open for book suggestions, too. But that’s probably a different thread.

Tanya on December 2, 2008 at 9:20 PM

Whoa – not my meaning at all. I was suggesting that watching Stewart and Colbert is about as useful as watching Hannity. No literacy test here.

Recommending a good book, maybe a Pinot. (Call me).

Hell, maybe I should do it.

Now I’m no genius, but shouldn’t we relish having our thinking challenged by people smarter than we? Why can’t we have more Krauthammers, Buckleys and Pragers?

My wishlist for Christmas.

Sean Hannity vs. Rachel Maddow would so rock.

Sapwolf on December 2, 2008 at 5:42 PM

Simply unwatchable.

Hannity’s grown stale (in my opinion).

Fox should send him back to the radio and give the slot to KP and a backlit AP.

Now, them’s gonna’ git ya some ratings!

And Fox needs Hitchens. Either on the Panel or opposite Hannity.

budfox on December 2, 2008 at 7:17 PM

Now that I’d watch!

He’s a low talent hack, Tanya, even if he laughs at silly liberals once every few years. Get a nice book from the library.

Jaibones on December 2, 2008 at 8:45 PM

I’m not sure I get the non-sequitur. I’m suddenly illiterate because I think he’s going to switch to our side as soon as the easy humor target changes?

What’s your point? You think the Sean Hannity vote stayed home for McCain because of Ayers? Good analysis.

Jaibones on December 2, 2008 at 8:44 PM

I think his point was that even after weeks of hammering away about Ayers, only a very small section of the country really gave a crap about Obama’s associations. When most commentators who might want to sway the narrative might start discussing things people actually cared about, like the economy, he decided to stick with this losing strategy.