Bush: I was “unprepared for war”

posted at 12:30 pm on December 1, 2008 by Ed Morrissey

ABC will broadcast an interview with George Bush that begins nine weeks of valedictory messages from the outgoing President — and he has a few things to get off of his chest before Barack Obama takes the oath of office.  Bush tells Charlie Gibson that he came into office “unprepared for war,” and that he regrets the faulty intelligence of Saddam Hussein’s WMD.  However, he refused to say whether he would have done anything differently had the intelligence been more correct:

Looking back on his eight years in the White House, President George W. Bush said he was “unprepared” for war and pinpointed incorrect intelligence that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction as “biggest regret of all the presidency.”

“I think I was unprepared for war,” Bush told ABC News’ Charlie Gibson in an interview airing today on “World News.” “In other words, I didn’t campaign and say, ‘Please vote for me, I’ll be able to handle an attack,'” he said. “In other words, I didn’t anticipate war. Presidents — one of the things about the modern presidency is that the unexpected will happen.” …

When pressed by Gibson, Bush declined to “speculate” on whether he would still have gone to war if he knew Hussein didn’t have weapons of mass destruction.

“That is a do-over that I can’t do,” Bush said.

“Unprepared for war”?  That admission won’t help him in the final weeks.  I think it’s also inaccurate.  The Bush administration was prepared for war in Iraq, but they were not prepared for the occupation that followed.  If he’s referring to 9/11, he was just as prepared for that as the Clinton administration, and for the same reasons.  No one wanted to believe we were already at war with Islamist terrorists — and some people refuse to believe it even today.  John Edwards called the war on terror a “bumper sticker”, and unfortunately he’s hardly alone.

Bush has a few other regrets.  He wished he could have passed his immigration-reform bills, and he lamented the “tone” of the debate it generated.  Bush wanted the world to see America as a welcoming place, he says.  But what has that to do with illegal immigration?  We welcome legal immigrants, more than any other country, and give them an opportunity to assimilate fully into our society that even other Western nations do not.  The debate involved illegal immigration and national security, and in that sense, we should be a lot less welcoming than we have been up to now.

The President also says that he regrets not being able to elevate the tone in Washington.  Unfortunately, that required an opposition willing to meet him halfway on that goal.  Instead, we got eight years of unhinged Bush Derangement Syndrome, with non-stop conspiracy theories and unparalleled vitriol flung in his direction.  The blame does not belong at his feet for that nonsense.

We’ll see the difference during the transition.  Unlike the bitter, petty acts committed by the outgoing Clinton administration, including prying off the Ws on the computer keyboards, Bush commits himself to a smooth and classy transition for Barack Obama.  He has invited Obama to briefings to get him quickly up to speed, including one for the Citigroup bailout.  Bush says, “The more we can work together, the better off our country will be,” and unlike his predecessor administration, actually acts as though that means something to him.

What will Bush do with his free time after January 20?  He plans to write his memoirs, get back to a private life, and work on policy.  That book should be fascinating — and perhaps the place where the 43rd president settles a few scores.

Related Posts:

Breaking on Hot Air



Trackback URL


Comment pages: 1 2

Yes, the Republicans also have had their faults, which I won’t go into during this post because they are already well pointed out in the press, sometimes less than fairly.

DL13 on December 1, 2008 at 12:34 PM

You should. The supposed faults pointed out by the press are all bogus whereas a genuine conservative critique of the Republicans would be useful.

aengus on December 1, 2008 at 6:32 PM

I can’t wait for that book, seriously.

Baphomet on December 1, 2008 at 7:04 PM

Bush not prepared for war??? No kidding! That’s about the only honest thing that has come out of that empty head of his.

dk on December 1, 2008 at 8:16 PM

I have such conflict within me about the Bush’s.
On the one hand,, I just love them. I admire president Bush in so many ways,,, then,, on the other,,, when I hear things like this,,,, it’s like,, oh well,,, why even bother.

JellyToast on December 1, 2008 at 9:14 PM

I don’t think the Iraq war will determine how Bush is judged. The massive spending under his watch,and his Administration’s “handling” of the market crash–these are the things people will remember. The judgment will be, I suspect, that he was not up to the job.

james23 on December 2, 2008 at 9:00 AM

“…and perhaps the place where the 43rd president settles a few scores.”

What makes you think he will settle a few scores? One of the big criticisms he receives is that he never defends himself!

scottjenn on December 2, 2008 at 12:27 PM

Comment pages: 1 2