Get your Junior Deputy badge and play DHS agent!

posted at 2:26 pm on November 26, 2008 by Ed Morrissey

And you can get a tour of the cockpit and bring guns onto the airplane!  I just love stories like this when I’m between flights.  I’ll blame Jules Crittenden for noticing the fact that no one bothered to check an imposter’s badge or follow procedures, but just took the imposter’s word for it while pointing out all of the air marshals and letting him into the cockpit — on two flights:

State police and airline ticket agents whisked a Rockland man who claimed he had a gun around TSA security checkpoints at Logan International Airport, putting him on a plane after he flashed a Chatham assistant harbormaster’s badge and claimed he was a federal agent, an FBI affidavit said. …

The affidavit states that on a January 2007 trip from Boston to San Diego, Grant told American Airlines [AMR] ticket agents he was armed and worked for the Department of Homeland Security. He filled out a flying-while-armed form in which, the FBI says, he listed his occupation as DHS. In reality, the salesman volunteered on the Cape and Island Homeland Security Subcommittee. On two flights, crews following federal regulations identified for him everyone who was armed on the plane, including two air marshals. On one plane, he was taken into the cockpit.

The affidavit says the error began when the ticket agents at Logan, asking for Grant’s identification, were satisfied with his harbormaster’s badge, and a trooper only looked at Grant’s form and his badge before signing Grant in the TSA log book and letting him board his flight via an exit door. Though required by federal rules, at no point did Grant show them a letter from the Department of Homeland Security, his supposed employer, stating the reason he needed to carry a gun, the affidavit said. A gate agent in San Diego spotted the error, and the FBI met Grant at Logan.

Stephen Grant now faces charges of impersonating a federal agent, which could bring him three years in prison.  He claims he already paid a fine to resolve this violation, but apparently federal prosecutors have no record of a settlement, at least not at the federal level, which would have jurisdiction.  Grant claims a “mixup”, but with his record in this instance, he’s not the most reliable of sources.

At the same time, TSA should fire everyone who handled Grant short of the one agent in San Diego who smelled something fishy.  All Grant had to do was to show a badge and fill out a form, and everyone believed him to be authorized by the DHS to travel while armed.  The procedures specify that any DHS traveling armed has to have a letter specifically authorizing the agent to carry a weapon, yet no one who vetted Grant required him to produce authorization, or even look closely at the badge.

Jules reminds us that two of the four 9/11 flights originated out of Logan Airport. One might expect the TSA agents there to take security a wee bit more seriously, considering.  How many other people get to board flights while packing by flashing badges that no one inspects?  Why are we only hearing about this two years after it happened?

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

When I’m home for Thanksgiving, I’m gonna kick in the door wearing one of these beauties and screaming, “Put your hands up where I can see them.”

chunderroad on November 26, 2008 at 2:31 PM

I always thought it was odd that on TV, cops just flash a badge and get access to whatever they want. I guess that’s how it really works.

I need to get myself a badge of some sort…

Evilwhiteguy on November 26, 2008 at 2:34 PM

It reminds me of this part in Scary Movie:

Deputy Doofy: Mom said that when I wear this badge you’re supposed to treat me like a man of the law.

Buffy Gilmore: Yeah, and Mom also said for you to stop sticking your d*** in the vacuum cleaner!

Lay-Z on November 26, 2008 at 2:35 PM

Ed, I already HATE airplanes. This isn’t making me wanna fly anytime soon.

upinak on November 26, 2008 at 2:35 PM

Badges?! We don’t need no stinking badges!

In Obama’s new security force, will we get our own badges, too? And a decoder ring?

Badger40 on November 26, 2008 at 2:35 PM

Could we also get a thread on the terrorist attacks in India? There are dozens reported dead, the fighting is still going on, there are now reports of attacks at the Marriott Hotel, and the terrorists were reportedly seeking out westerners.

amerpundit on November 26, 2008 at 2:39 PM

Let me be the first (and probably only) person to say: I don’t care. I’m not at all worried about another terrorist attack using airplanes as bombs. The reason? Before 9/11 people either weren’t aware of the threat or didn’t take it seriously. Because of this, four groups of very lightly-armed people were able to commandeer the jets they were flying on and nobody on three of those jets took any action. Those on the fourth jet took action and, while they lost their own lives in the attempt, were able to prevent further atrocities.

The key difference is awareness. In a hijacking situation, 9/11 will now be the foremost thing on everyone’s mind. We’ve already taken the most effective possible step and reinforced the cockpit doors. Beyond that, there are too many ways to sneak weapons onto an aircraft to prevent a person from becoming armed and dangerous on a flight. It’s not a solvable problem. I’m OK with a reasonable amount of screening going onto the flight to catch the stupid and crazy people with weapons. An intelligent and determined person will always be able to circumvent these measures, and we might as well just get over it now.

Like most 9/11 “countermeasures,” the over-the-top (in both scope and incompetence) airport security is focused on yesterdays problems. If we put as much effort into intelligence gathering and disaster response as we do into getting people to remove their shoes, the world would be a heck of a lot safer.

ErikTheRed on November 26, 2008 at 2:40 PM

That’s right, I’ll get out my old “Cops’N Robbers” badge, the one I didn’t sell on eBay, and start packin’ when I go-a-flyin’…. Don’t we all feel secure? Who said we had to worry about 1984 when we are being protected by the Keystone Cops?

DL13 on November 26, 2008 at 2:44 PM

Why are we only hearing about this two years after it happened?

Maybe someone wanted to expose exactly how competent and well run government bureaucracies truly are before Mr. Obama, President Elect, the Office of expands the size of government ten fold?

Seven Percent Solution on November 26, 2008 at 2:46 PM

I used to fly in and out of Logan a lot in the 1950s and 1960s, and it was hack city even then as far as “security”. Due to a change in living locations, I then didn’t fly from Logan until…2001.

5 months before 9/11, some friends and I flew out of Logan nonstop on Air Jamaica to MoBay. The “security” then was a joke, at least for us, since we were flying first class. In fact, we got more scrutiny coming back in from Jamaica than flying out. No doubt they were afraid we were trying to smuggle in some rum or (gasp) Jamaican cigareets.

BTW, on the flight from Logan to MoBay, since we were in First Class, we got to visit the cockpit and chat with the pilots. Of course that won’t happen again.

Del Dolemonte on November 26, 2008 at 2:46 PM

The key difference is awareness. In a hijacking situation, 9/11 will now be the foremost thing on everyone’s mind.

As has occurred on some flights since 9-11 passengers have shown they will not hesitate to take someone down if they are acting suspicious or making threats.

With the awareness of passengers it is highly unlikely a group of terrorists armed with box cutters and a fake bomb will be able to hijack a plane today.

Liberty or Death on November 26, 2008 at 2:52 PM

sorry for the offtopic but Ed are you gonna report on the terrorist attacks in Mumbai? Latest report is they have American hostages

cnn.com has a live stream

offroadaz on November 26, 2008 at 2:57 PM

Oh, so just do everything he did PLUS bring along a forged letter, and you’ll be golden?

Seriously, there should be better controls than that in place. Maybe have it so officers report directly to airport security and check in there. Security could make a few phone calls or something… I’m just sayin’…

scharfy on November 26, 2008 at 3:01 PM

Please tell me at least the guy wasn’t wearing a kaffiyeh.

Cicero43 on November 26, 2008 at 3:05 PM

One might expect the TSA agents there to take security a wee bit more seriously, considering.

Ed:
They’re Federal employees
They’re Union memebers
Get a grip!

eeyore on November 26, 2008 at 3:16 PM

Yeah, they should have a more thorough check for people who bring GUNS ON A PLANE.

SoulGlo on November 26, 2008 at 3:20 PM

In 2003, I took a flight from Washington DC to Seattle. On the return flight, I was picked at random for an inspection of my shoes. (Either that or they triggered an alarm or something.) Only after I arrived at BWI, got to my car, and reached for my keys, did I notice that my Swiss Army knife was on the keyring the entire time.

Ooops.

manwithblackhat on November 26, 2008 at 3:27 PM

The solution for this is to allow anyone with a proper firearms license from any state to fly armed. The more legally armed honest citizens in an airport or on an airplane the less chance of a hijacking.

johnsteele on November 26, 2008 at 3:27 PM

Yeah, they should have a more thorough check for people who bring GUNS ON A PLANE.

SoulGlo on November 26, 2008 at 3:20 PM

You can have all the checks you want and the bad guys will always find a way around them — that’s why they are called bad guys. But people seem to be erfectly fine with the bad guys having guns, afterall we expect them to, but get apoplectic at the thought that honest law abiding citizens can have firearms.

johnsteele on November 26, 2008 at 3:34 PM

They just need to get rid of the preposterous no-guns-on-planes rule. It’s unconstitutional anyway.

urbancenturion on November 26, 2008 at 3:38 PM

Ed:
They’re Federal employees
They’re Union memebers
Get a grip!

eeyore on November 26, 2008 at 3:16 PM

Actually eeyore, TSA is not unionized. Considering how big of a fight there was when DHS was founded regarding unionization of the workforce I’m surprised anyone makes that mistake in the first place.

As far as this incident goes, it seems that most of the blame falls on the state police working at the terminal. At the airport I work at, the police are the first ones that examine the identification of any law enforcement personnel flying armed. Only after the officer logs the person into the book does a Lead or Supervisor from the TSA look at the ID.

Should that TSA employee have caught the obvious mistake being made by the police? Of course, but considering how little power they actually give us in TSA I can understand why that person would have yielded to the judgment of a law enforcement officer.

Shivv on November 26, 2008 at 3:47 PM

I don’t even know where to start. I think we need to throw out the whole lot of them. Bush originally wanted to make airport security an entry level FBI job, thus attracting better, more qualified people. Decent pay and a shot at advancement would also give incentives for performance.

Laura in Maryland on November 26, 2008 at 3:51 PM

Not to worry, folks. Obama will appoint Janet Napolitano as head of Homeland Security and we’ll all be so much safer. She has been unable (or unwilling) to secure the borders of her own state, so Obama will reward her incompetence by giving her a promotion and putting her in charge of the entire nation’s security.

Sleep well.

AZCoyote on November 26, 2008 at 3:57 PM

What is really amazing is that terrorists have not figured this out already. Just flash a badge (fake or reasonable facsimile), fill out a form, and forge a letter, ‘all aboard’. How hard can that be? This would not seem to be a deterent for anyone who seriously wants to hijack a plane. Oh yeah, they are all hijacking tankers for millions of dollars in the Middle East! Better 10 million dolars now, than 72 virgins later.

jerseyman on November 26, 2008 at 4:11 PM

Mabey Archie Bunker was right, way back in 1976….

Video

syncrodude on November 26, 2008 at 4:11 PM

Actually eeyore, TSA is not unionized…
Shivv on November 26, 2008 at 3:47 PM

Sorry, Shivv. I guess I was thinking back on the story at Logan(?) a few years ago, when an agent walked away from a one-person security checkpoint in a small concourse because his replacement hadn’t arrived and his break time had. That sounded kind of uniony, but maybe that wasn’t TSA.

I’m surprised anyone makes that mistake in the first place.

The Little Grey Cells are starting to do that.

eeyore on November 26, 2008 at 4:15 PM

I blame the democraps.

Zorro on November 26, 2008 at 4:19 PM

In Obama’s new security force, will we get our own badges, too? And a decoder ring?

Badger40 on November 26, 2008 at 2:35 PM

I thought we were getting armbands. And brown shirts.

CurtZHP on November 26, 2008 at 4:19 PM

Security can only go SO far.

Stupidity cannot be given training.*

*See U.S. Senate for details.

HornetSting on November 26, 2008 at 4:25 PM

T-S-A…Totally Stupid A**holes. The TSA motto?: “Dominate, Intimidate, Control.”
I have a friend of mine who is a senior pilot with a major airlines. I asked him if we are any safer today than we were on 9-11 with TSA in place. His reply as he looked over at me-”No”.
There are so many stories about these inept people in a uniform.
Seemingly McDonald’s has a higher bar to clear for employment.
Go here for some eye opening stories.

Amendment X on November 26, 2008 at 5:41 PM

We hear about it two years after it happened because they didn’t want someone else to try it before they could make sure everybody was properly trained, for real this time, so it won’t happen again.

njcommuter on November 26, 2008 at 6:23 PM

The civilian officer at the exit was responsible for this screw up, not TSA.
I and every one on my crew are very dedicated to the security of the flying public, and this kind of bone up would not happen at my airport.
by the way, I am not a totally stupid a**hole. Not all the TSA is incompetent, it is bad leadership at certain airports.

opiemuyo on November 26, 2008 at 6:36 PM

When I worked for the DOD,(Navy) one of the tall skinny young guys carefully taped a pic of Mihkael Gorbachov over his official ID.

Day after day, he would walk through the gate 2 or 3 times a day (morning, lunch etc) and flash the badge with gorby’s pic. Not one guard ever took a closer look. That was back in the late 80′s or so.

bullseye on November 26, 2008 at 8:45 PM

Can I get a I Hate Hippies badge? A real shiny one?

Let’s roll.

ex-Democrat on November 26, 2008 at 11:18 PM

Skip Janet Nappy for Homeland Security, put this guy in his her place.

Tim Burton on November 27, 2008 at 12:21 AM

And people wonder why I prefer to drive… granted I’m not usually in a hurry. I got the wheel “Scotty”, give me all she’s got.

Hog Wild on November 27, 2008 at 1:10 AM

-sipping koolaid in slippers and bathrobe-

I am trying to figure why there aren’t mass firings in the MSM after this disaster of election coverage and I want to know why someone hasn’t created FoxNews 2 yet. One of these times, if it hasn’t already, the MSM is going to cause this country some serious damage.

johnnyU on November 27, 2008 at 8:41 AM

the thought that honest law abiding citizens can have firearms.

This concept flies in the teeth of 0bamanism and will not be tolerated once His 0bamaness ascends to the Presidency!

GeneSmith on November 27, 2008 at 1:34 PM

Just some points, federal law enforcement agents do not need a letter authorizing them to fly. Their federal credentials, not the badge, authorized them to fly armed. Non-federal, e.g. state and local, including assistant harbormasters, need credentials, a badge, and a letter from the head of their agency to fly armed. All law enforcement officers flying armed are introducted to the captain in the cockpit and are identified to other law enforcement officers flying armed on the flight. It appears that the state trooper is at fault for not examinining the badge and the credentials of the assistant harbormaster.

federale86 on November 27, 2008 at 3:46 PM