Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


New Huckabee book rips Mitt, Fred, evangelical leaders, pretty much everyone; Update: Romney camp fires back

posted at 12:04 pm on November 17, 2008 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

A desperately needed fix of campaign drama during this post-election interregnum detox. Just give me a little hit of score-settling to get me through the day, bro. Just one hit.

Ah, that’s the stuff:

Mitt Romney, Huckabee’s principal rival in Iowa, comes in for the roughest treatment. Huckabee writes that the former Massachusetts governor’s record was “anything but conservative until he changed the light bulbs in his chandelier in time to run for president.” He notes that Romney declined to make a phone call of congratulations after Huckabee beat the oddsmakers to win the Iowa caucuses, “which we took as a sign of total disrespect.” He mocks Romney for suggesting, during one debate, more investment in high-yield stocks as a solution to economic woes. “Let them eat stocks!” Huckabee jokes…

He calls out Pat Robertson, the Virginia-based televangelist, and Dr. Bob Jones III, chancellor of Bob Jones University in South Carolina, for endorsing Rudy Giuliani and Romney, respectively. He also has words for the Texas-based Rev. John Hagee, who endorsed the more moderate John McCain in the primaries, as someone who was drawn to the eventual Republican nominee because of the lure of power. Huckabee speaks to Hagee by phone before the McCain endorsement, while the former Arkansas governor is preparing for a spot on Saturday Night Live. “I asked if he had prayed about this and believed this was what the Lord wanted him to do,” Huckabee writes of his conversation with Hagee. “I didn’t get a straight answer.” Months later, McCain rejected Hagee’s endorsement because of controversial remarks the pastor had made about biblical interpretations.

In a chapter titled “Faux-Cons: Worse than Liberalism,” Huckabee identifies what he calls the “real threat” to the Republican Party: “libertarianism masked as conservatism.” He is not so much concerned with the libertarian candidate Ron Paul’s Republican supporters as he is with a strain of mainstream fiscal conservative thought that demands ideological purity, seeing any tax increase as apostasy and leaving little room for government-driven solutions to people’s problems.

Kudos to Time for a choice selection of representative quotes: Waging low-grade class warfare by sneering at Romney’s wealth and appealing to evangelicals to vote along religious lines is Huck to a T. As is the bit about “government-driven solutions,” of course — this is a guy who once endorsed a federal ban on smoking in workplaces, remember — although that’s qualified by the fact that he’s been a loud and, for most conservatives, righteous opponent of the bailout. Whether that’s because he knows an unpopular issue when he sees one or because an extraordinary intervention in extraordinary circumstances crossed some sort of statist threshold in his mind that ordinary interventions in ordinary circumstances wouldn’t, only he knows. We’ll learn more circa 2010, I imagine.

InstaGlenn will interview him later this week; I eagerly await their exchange on the merits of libertarianism. Exit question: In a Huck/Palin primary showdown, who escapes with the lion’s share of the Christian vote? Don’t answer too hastily. Guilt is, potentially, a factor here.

Update: Another hit on the drama pipe. Mmmmm yeah.

Asked to respond, Romney spokesman Eric Fehrnstrom said Huckabee was acting small.

“This type of pettiness is beneath Mike Huckabee,” Fehrnstrom. “If we’re going to move the party forward, we need to offer more than personal recriminations. Unfortunately, in this book, Mike Huckabee is consumed with presumed slights, and he seems more interested in settling scores than in bringing people together.”


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6

For the record…I DO NOT think Palin is “dumb” I think Huckabee is smarter, more conservative, and a lot quicker on his feet in an interview or debate.

That’s not even debatable.

Al-Ozarka on November 17, 2008 at 1:30 PM

It is to laugh.

peski on November 17, 2008 at 1:33 PM

I’m amazed at the hatred towards Huckabee here at Hot-Air. And doubly amazed at the lack of acknowledgment that Romney is a liberal…a faux-con.

Al-Ozarka on November 17, 2008 at 1:05 PM

From the primaries, I remember a whole lot of people calling Mitt a RINO, a faux-con, and similar epithets…who ALSO thought Huckabee was box office poison.

It’s not Romney vs. Huckabee. It’s Huckabee vs. anyone who gets in Huckabee’s way. After a while the pattern grows clear, and Huck’s underlying character defects became obvious to all but the most die-hard of his supporters. Meanwhile, though I liked Romney, I wasn’t blind to his weaknesses as a candidate, and though I was worried Palin would get the Quayle treatment I saw in her a party leader I could support enthusiastically.

President or dogcatcher, Palin would be happy doing what she’s doing, happy with her family about her, content in her own skin. I don’t see that quality in Huckabee.

sulla on November 17, 2008 at 1:34 PM

And really…to herald something as idiotic as this aloud is not very flattering for you.

Al-Ozarka on November 17, 2008 at 1:32 PM

Okay, yeah you’re allowed to have your own opinion. But to run around calling other people idiotic and worthless then hide behind something as flimsy as

It’s MY OPINION!

God gave me the right.

is a sham.

*eats*

Grue in the Attic on November 17, 2008 at 1:34 PM

Huckabee is a great man, he doesn’t hide from his principles like that phony Willard Romney.

Even if you don’t agree with him on every issue you must admit he deserves respect for living his beliefs,sticking to his principles and not hiding from them.

Mike Huckabee exposed the RINO media and RINO republican party for what it truly is this year and for that I truly respect him.

The RINO party lost big this election and it looks like they are finished for good now, thank God.

SaintOlaf on November 17, 2008 at 1:34 PM

PHuckabee`s act has grown old and this is more proof that he needs to completely get out of the way of those who truly want to lead the GOP. The guy is a hater.

Let`s not forget that it is because of HIM that we got stuck with McCain as our nominee.

Rockshine on November 17, 2008 at 1:34 PM

Huckleberry Hound IS a small petty scumbag…that’s why he has his own show on FNC. Now Horealdo has competition.

So, according to some people here the reason Romney wasn’t picked by the Repubs and the press was that he’s liberal, not because he’s a Mormon. Okey dokey.

Christine on November 17, 2008 at 1:34 PM

I suspect that if you get right down to it, you could state the same hates about every other potential GOP leader on the radar-screen.

Al-Ozarka on November 17, 2008 at 1:33 PM

Not Palin. Or Jindal.

*eats*

Grue in the Attic on November 17, 2008 at 1:35 PM

MB4,

I read ‘em as I see ‘em.

Al-Ozarka on November 17, 2008 at 1:35 PM

SaintOlaf on November 17, 2008 at 1:34 PM

Holy crap, an Olaf sighting.

peski on November 17, 2008 at 1:36 PM

When the hell have I ever liked Huck? Sniffing glue again?

LevStrauss on November 17, 2008 at 1:31 PM

When haven’t you sniffed it? That is right.. your head is so far up B.O.’s butt you don’t need glue.

upinak on November 17, 2008 at 1:37 PM

Again with the insults and name calling. You guys stay classy.

jparks1972 on November 17, 2008 at 1:37 PM

Huckabee is the Jesse Jackson of the right. And I mean that in every way possible.

rockmom on November 17, 2008 at 1:37 PM

SaintOlaf on November 17, 2008 at 1:34 PM

Ozarka, Olaf here is a rather virulent Huck supporter. The fact that in this thread he is more tame and relaxed than you is a sign that you may want to consider taking an hour or so off HotAir.

Heyah Olaf.

*eats*

Grue in the Attic on November 17, 2008 at 1:37 PM

Wow, some real classy and mature comments here…

You-Eh-Vee on November 17, 2008 at 1:37 PM

Sarah Palin’s best points were her libertarian ones. We need libertarians. It wasn’t just the Bible readers who voted for Reagan and Bush.

Speedwagon82 on November 17, 2008 at 1:38 PM

OFFS!

Huck is a DEAD ISSUES. He is just trying to save his bank account via dumb people buying his book. PERIOD!

I am done, this thread is shot… time to field dress it and move on to jerky.

upinak on November 17, 2008 at 1:38 PM

Hey, Huckabee, America would never have elected you with your name. As for Palin, she was ambushed, had her answers truncated or left out, and treated like dog dirt by these dog dirt people interviewing her, except for Greta and Sean.

rlwo2008 on November 17, 2008 at 1:38 PM

“windfall profits tax against oil companies”

The Federal government owned as Alaska as a result of Alaska being purchased from Russia. The federal government gave the mineral rights to Alaska as a condition of statehood so that the state would be self-sufficient.

The oil companies pay a royalty to the state. It’s not a tax and not a windfall profits tax.

kcewa on November 17, 2008 at 1:38 PM

“Not Palin. Or Jindal.” Grue

You’re premature judgment of these two individuals’ qualifications is quite revealing.

Al-Ozarka on November 17, 2008 at 1:38 PM

All those people who think Romney is a “faux” conservative needs to explain to me how can a conservative get elected in Massachusetts AND serve his constituents. Honestly, I am as anti-abortion as the next person, but wasn’t Romney elected to represent the will of his constituents, and not overturn their will? And if they wanted govt run healthcare, wasn’t it his DUTY to give them their best possible options?

I am confused as to how conservatives are supposed to get elected AND represent the people if said conservative and all people do NOT agree on the issues?

Califemme on November 17, 2008 at 1:23 PM

You make a valid point. Americans aren’t as ideological as the parties would have us think and they really crave competent government for than anything else. It will be interesting to see if Obama manages to satisfy this by breaking with his own supporters and continues to reach for the center. If he doesn’t, the way is open to the opposition to grab the center and the office.

lexhamfox on November 17, 2008 at 1:39 PM

That shmukebee is a peace of sh.. i hate him…

al on November 17, 2008 at 1:40 PM

“Hey, Huckabee, America would never have elected you with your name”

How utterly foolish. How heartbreakingly childish.

Al-Ozarka on November 17, 2008 at 1:41 PM

If one weren’t tithing half their paycheck to some sort of government entity they would probably have more to give to charity, to their imaginary friend (Jebus or what not), pay their crummy mortgage, pay down their debt. Yes those heartless fiscal conservatives that realize money would be able to help the poor more efficiently in the private sector. Also lower taxes across the board lowers prices so poor people would be able to afford more goods in the first place.

And your final sentence is complete plagarism, I have to go back and read Vlad Lenin tonight and find out exactly where you pilfered it.

LevStrauss on November 17, 2008 at 1:28 PM

Typical anarchist, completely incapable of understanding even the simplest of points, making up stupidly absurd ****ing s**t (like me supporting a 50% tax rate, or thinking fiscal conservatives are “heartless”; try “stupid” and you’d hit the mark) and invoking lenin whenever someone even thinks about suggesting that the government should do more than bomb some foreign country they didn’t even know existed until 9/11.

I’m not a communist, a**hole. In fact, considering I’ve had relatives killed, robbed beaten into permanent paralysis by communists, I’d beat you within an inch of your POS miserable life if we met off the Internet. I’m not even a liberal. I’m a fiscal moderate who recognizes that a lopsided balance of power will result with one form of tyrant or another abusing the rest of the population. Fiscal conservatives live in la-la land and think that if the government just got out, everything will be just fine. It won’t. All it does is allow the one who plays the game the best to rule, and the one who plays the game the best will always be the bad guy because he won’t have a self-imposed morality standing in his way. If companies can abuse other people for money they will do it. If people can abuse companies for money they will do it. That is why a balance must be maintained.

Darth Executor on November 17, 2008 at 1:41 PM

So, according to some people here the reason Romney wasn’t picked by the Repubs and the press was that he’s liberal, not because he’s a Mormon. Okey dokey.

Christine on November 17, 2008 at 1:34 PM

LOL! How very “astute” of you!! We all know that the media HATES liberals!

/sarcasm

Califemme on November 17, 2008 at 1:42 PM

How utterly foolish. How heartbreakingly childish.

Just like this thread…

Good Lt on November 17, 2008 at 1:42 PM

Every time Allah posts a Huckabee article, I am more convinced that the conservative movement is dead.

Al-Ozarka on November 17, 2008 at 1:25 PM

You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

</Inigo Montoya>

sulla on November 17, 2008 at 1:43 PM

You’re premature judgment of these two individuals’ qualifications is quite revealing.

Al-Ozarka on November 17, 2008 at 1:38 PM

I’m a reactionary. Those are the only people I’ve seen, so far, who are far enough right for my tastes.

*eats*

Grue in the Attic on November 17, 2008 at 1:43 PM

Huckabee is the Jesse Jackson of the right. And I mean that in every way possible.

rockmom on November 17, 2008 at 1:37 PM

You are SO right, that nails him EXACTLY.

JustTruth101 on November 17, 2008 at 1:43 PM

Every time Allah posts a Huckabee article, I am more convinced that the conservative movement is dead.

Al-Ozarka on November 17, 2008 at 1:25 PM

You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

sulla on November 17, 2008 at 1:43 PM

POST OF THE FORKING YEAR!!!!

*eats*

Grue in the Attic on November 17, 2008 at 1:44 PM

I read ‘em as I see ‘em.

Al-Ozarka on November 17, 2008 at 1:35 PM

Maybe that’s the problem.

MB4 on November 17, 2008 at 1:44 PM

For the record…I DO NOT think Palin is “dumb” I think Huckabee is smarter, more conservative, and a lot quicker on his feet in an interview or debate.

That’s not even debatable.

Since Palin and Huckabee have not debated head to head, I’d say that the relative abilities of the two are… debatable. (It’s sort of why we have playoffs in the NFL.)

But, let’s leave the issue of how each of them perform in the media (and whatever inferences you draw about their intelligence from that) aside. Some things that are certainly not debatable:

On December 26, 2007 the conservative organization Judicial Watch announced that Mike Huckabee was named to its list of Washington’s “Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians” for 2007. They state that Huckabee, as governor, was the subject of “14 ethics complaints and a volley of questions about his integrity, ranging from his management of campaign cash to his use of a nonprofit organization to subsidize his income to his destruction of state computer files on his way out of the governor’s office.” Judicial Watch further accused Huckabee of attempting to block the state ethics commission’s investigations of the allegations.[130]
The Cato Institute, a libertarian non-profit public policy research foundation, gave Huckabee an “F” for spending and tax policy in 2006.[131] Huckabee has asserted he did not raise spending significantly in areas he could control and in those areas spending rose six-tenths of one percent a year during his entire governance.[79] He also signed the first broad-based tax cut in Arkansas’s history.[71] For 2006, he says that his state enjoyed a surplus of nearly $850 million.[132] In January, 2008, Huckabee repeated this assertion, while also pointing out that at the beginning of his term Arkansas had a $200 million deficit.[133][134] However, during his tenure, the state’s general obligation debt increased by almost $1 billion.[71]

Y-not on November 17, 2008 at 1:44 PM

I’m amazed at the hatred towards Huckabee here at Hot-Air. And doubly amazed at the lack of acknowledgment that Romney is a liberal…a faux-con.

Al-Ozarka on November 17, 2008 at 1:05 PM

I have met Mike, and I was there in Little Rock when he won his first term as Governor. What you and others who are Huckahu fans do not understand is that we do not “hate” him, but we do strongly dislike his lack of Conservative ideology. He is not a Conservative pure and simple and I do not care how pro-life he claims to be, he is not a true Conservative.

Explain how writing this book is going to help the GOP or Conservative movement? To perform character assassinations on the leaders in the Christian Right, attack those like Fred and Mitt, but praise McCain; how in the world is that building up the party? Note to Huckahu Akbahr, McCain is persona non grata and the sooner he shuts his yapper and sits down in the Senate the better. As Rush said earlier today, McCain meeting with Obama scares the hell out of me! Butt love with McCain is not going to win brownie points with the Base!

This is not hate, but extreme dislike, and Mike deserves every bit of it and more for what he has done and continues to do.

By the way what MB4 dug up is just the beginning of what the Dems would have been able to throw at Mike if he had been the nominee!

freeus on November 17, 2008 at 1:47 PM

How utterly foolish. How heartbreakingly childish.

Just like this thread…

Good Lt on November 17, 2008 at 1:42 PM

Seems to be a tradition with Huckabee threads.

I wonder why that is…

sulla on November 17, 2008 at 1:47 PM

“according to some people here the reason Romney wasn’t picked by the Repubs and the press was that he’s liberal, not because he’s a Mormon. Okey dokey.”

The Mormon issue was a factor with some repubs, not with the press. The relevant point for his electability, though, is he didn’t have the poliical skills to overcome a reluctance to vote for Mormons.

Or to overcome his record in Massachusetts.

kcewa on November 17, 2008 at 1:48 PM

Finally we had an honest and well meaning patriot, Mike Huckabee, run for president and he would have won with 100 million votes if he had the opportunity..but of course after he was slammed, smeared and beat out in the primaries with out right voter fraud(see washington state etc.), he realized that the whole process is a big scam and that there is no real demcracy in America. So he asked for a TV show instead(at the same network which slandered and smeared him BTW) and he got it. If the media is crooked and diabolical at least there is one man out there who will tell the truth and be the change that he wants to affect.

Yes his show is the best show on television and puts the Hannity show to shame.

SaintOlaf on November 17, 2008 at 1:50 PM

What happened to “Count it all Joy?” A Christian minister badmouthing opponents. A pastor denigrating other Christians for how they voted…

Count it all Joy, brothers.

Doug on November 17, 2008 at 12:49 PM

First of all I don’t think “government-driven solutions to people’s problems” are the biblical idea of caring for those in need.

Second, I would like to add this to Doug’s words above.

I am an evangelical Christian who did not support Huck in the primaries.

Huck’s statements are both saddening and dreadful. They are not a good example to other Christians nor are they a good witness of Christian character to those who are not believers in Jesus Christ.

If Huck feels he was unfairly or wrongly treated, the New Testament contains a lot of teaching about how Christians are to act if they are suffering (as Doug quoted above from the NT). In 1 Peter the apostle writes that we are to follow Christ’s example and not to revile or threaten in return. We are not to return evil for evil or insult for insult.

As Christians we fail, but as we grow older and more mature we should be growing more in character to be slow to speak and slow to anger. We should increasingly become more like Christ in our actions. In writing a book there is plenty of time to reflect and take back and revise our words–far more so than in conversation when we are tired or frustrated.

The results of Huck’s behavior is that God and the name of Christ is mocked, even as David’s sin caused God to be blasphemed.

INC on November 17, 2008 at 1:50 PM

Freeus,

I have also met Huckabee. He was also MY governor for 10 1/2 years.

Funny how a red-state can continue to re-elect a faux conservative like that.

Maybe you prefer the type of government a Club For Growth would give you. I wouldn’t.

Al-Ozarka on November 17, 2008 at 1:51 PM

Yes his show is the best show on television

Wow. If that’s true then I’m reeeeeeeeally glad I stopped watching TV years go.

*eats*

Grue in the Attic on November 17, 2008 at 1:52 PM

Y-not on November 17, 2008 at 1:44 PM

Wow.

Nothing to see here folks… Keep moving….

Case closed.

Califemme on November 17, 2008 at 1:52 PM

President or dogcatcher, Palin would be happy doing what she’s doing, happy with her family about her, content in her own skin. I don’t see that quality in Huckabee.

sulla on November 17, 2008 at 1:34 PM

A character issue if I ever saw one.

Badger40 on November 17, 2008 at 1:52 PM

But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you

Or write a wonky book about what a bunch of a-holes they are. Either way.

RightOFLeft on November 17, 2008 at 1:52 PM

I hate to say this but I told you about 2 years ago he was a pinhead. He has zero chance now.

KBird on November 17, 2008 at 1:53 PM

INC on November 17, 2008 at 1:50 PM

Well said, INC.

sulla on November 17, 2008 at 1:53 PM

“You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.”

Or maybe you are limiting the meaning of the word.

Al-Ozarka on November 17, 2008 at 1:54 PM

Or maybe you are limiting the meaning of the word.

Al-Ozarka on November 17, 2008 at 1:54 PM

It means what it means. To add more is to “go beyond”.

You’re a Huck fan so I assume you’re religious and you’ll get that.

*eats*

Grue in the Attic on November 17, 2008 at 1:54 PM

Oh, a Huckabee thread, replete with the same old trolls.

Call me when it’s over.

TexasDan on November 17, 2008 at 1:55 PM

Call me when it’s over.

TexasDan on November 17, 2008 at 1:55 PM

Smarter man than many of us *waves*

*eats*

Grue in the Attic on November 17, 2008 at 1:55 PM

Huckabee is whining too much…what kind of person does this.

Chudi on November 17, 2008 at 1:57 PM

Finally, Huckabee, the man we need today.

Because the only thing that will bring the Republican party back to majority is infighting, backbiting, recrimination, smears, friendly fire, and eating your own.

Nothing else can work. No policy, idea, viewpoint, nothing; only vicious nasty infighting. And that is what Huckabee brings to the table; heck it’s what he’s been bringing since day 1, so maybe he foresaw the dawn of his day; when his special talents would be needed.

Only by attacking and destroying our own will we become stronger and more respected… or something like that.

Hey, I’m not a policy genius like Huckabee, how should I know why this is helpful, beneficial, or wise. But I was told Huckabee was a political mastermind so this must be what we need.

Lets get to attacking each other even more viciously than ever; for the good of the party.

But to get a majority, first all the social cons, libertarians, ex-liberals, and rich people must be purged from the party. Reducing numbers and attacking the base will help bring a majority for sure.

Can I ask if Huckabee has any math background?

gekkobear on November 17, 2008 at 1:57 PM

Al-Ozarka on November 17, 2008 at 1:54 PM

Nice comeback. Great timing.

sulla on November 17, 2008 at 1:58 PM

Oh, a Huckabee thread, replete with the same old trolls.

Call me when it’s over.

TexasDan on November 17, 2008 at 1:55 PM

I’m thirty-seven, I’m not old! And my name is Dennis!

sulla on November 17, 2008 at 2:00 PM

I never saw the appeal of Huckabee. I felt sorry for him for some reason. He reminded me of a poor puppy needing a gentle pat on the head.

Karen_VA on November 17, 2008 at 2:02 PM

I certainly did enjoy watching Mike Huckabee crush that vile atheist Bill Maher in a debate on his show a couple of weeks ago.

SaintOlaf on November 17, 2008 at 2:03 PM

Huckabee is whining too much…what kind of person does this.

Chudi on November 17, 2008 at 1:57 PM

…Huck’s Army?

sulla on November 17, 2008 at 2:03 PM

Huckabee is a BOZO. He just won’t take “NO” for an answer. Please just go away. You are very tiring.

enerwaste on November 17, 2008 at 2:05 PM

Huck’s antipathy towards Romney is based on anti-Mormonism, and everybody knows it.

WasatchMan on November 17, 2008 at 2:07 PM

Typical anarchist, completely incapable of understanding even the simplest of points, making up stupidly absurd ****ing s**t (like me supporting a 50% tax rate, or thinking fiscal conservatives are “heartless”; try “stupid” and you’d hit the mark) and invoking lenin whenever someone even thinks about suggesting that the government should do more than bomb some foreign country they didn’t even know existed until 9/11.

Regardless of what you are crying about I never said that you supported a 50% tax rate, I used the fifty percent figure because once its all said and done that’s how much a large portion pay in taxes (income, sales, rent(some call it property tax), gas, etc.)

Then you go on to say:

I’m not a communist, a**hole. In fact, considering I’ve had relatives killed, robbed beaten into permanent paralysis by communists, I’d beat you within an inch of your POS miserable life if we met off the Internet. I’m not even a liberal. I’m a fiscal moderate who recognizes that a lopsided balance of power will result with one form of tyrant or another abusing the rest of the population.

Again once we get past your sniveling and crying we go back to the original comment you made. Like I said I should go back and read Lenin, but if I remember correctly this statement reminds of his comments in his piece on Imperialism, but I have to check. If I would have gone on here saying that the “proles will revolt” saying that it was plagarizing Marx wouldn’t be off base. I did not put Lenins words, or a good paraphrase, in your mouth, you did. So cut all the crybaby toughguy sh!t and sit there with a smile paying your “fair” share even though it never is enough to the libs or the “moderates” in Washington. Yes damn anarchists wanting people to keep their own money and thinking that the overhead percentages that government operate on can be bested in the private sector, what a heartless man I am.

No they’re not. Libertarianism, which is pretty much fiscal anarchy, would result in the most ruthless, cruel sociopathic monster sitting at the top of the financial world trampling anybody who stands in his way beneath his feet.

LevStrauss on November 17, 2008 at 2:08 PM

Huckabee writes that the former Massachusetts governor’s record was “anything but conservative until he changed the light bulbs in his chandelier in time to run for president.”

Umm… What part of this quote is incorrect?

thecollegepolitico on November 17, 2008 at 2:12 PM

Of the foundational conservative principles of free markets, strong national defense, and traditional values, libertarians are strong on two (economics, defense), while Huck has only proven himself a true conservative on one (values)… I’m shocked that he of all people wrote a chapter on faux-cons!

Chi-town Conservative on November 17, 2008 at 2:17 PM

sulla on November 17, 2008 at 1:53 PM

Thanks. Huck’s self-serving is only self-destructive.

INC on November 17, 2008 at 2:32 PM

Who is more conservative…Dubya or Huck?

Al-Ozarka on November 17, 2008 at 2:32 PM

What’s the big surprise here? All of the Republican candidates loathed Romney and didn’t try to hide it. He’s a phony conservative and still has the wool pulled over many sets of eyes. After Obama won Iowa and was gaining big momentum, guess what Mittens changed his message to? CHANGE!!!! That moment in the campaign sealed my vote against flip-flop Mitt.

litebrite on November 17, 2008 at 2:35 PM

Fact: I, evangelical conservative, do not like nor have I ever liked Huckabee.
Fact #2: Huckabee impresses me with his new-found ability to fight. I never knew. God bless him for his honesty. If he hates everyone, I for one am glad to hear what he really thinks.

So, tired of those that employ psychobabble, better known as political correctness.

anti-boomer on November 17, 2008 at 2:35 PM

“Not Palin. Or Jindal.” Grue

You’re premature judgment of these two individuals’ qualifications is quite revealing.

Al-Ozarka on November 17, 2008 at 1:38 PM

Simma down now Ozarker. You’ve whipped yourself into a frenzy defending the Huckster.

Sure Huck has every right to write a book and say whatever he wants to say, but with that comes consequences. One being that people on HA will slam the daylights out of his words.

And just because he can (write a book) doesn’t mean he should. Not like that. It reveals more about Huck than it does about Mitt, Fred, etal. He’s a big boy. He wrote it. Let him defend himself.

Oink on November 17, 2008 at 2:45 PM

So, tired of those that employ psychobabble, better known as political correctness.

anti-boomer on November 17, 2008 at 2:35 PM

I’m with you there.

*eats*

Grue in the Attic on November 17, 2008 at 2:45 PM

Wow. Sounds like the Huckster really went off on everyone. Maybe Palin was spared his animosity. I do believe, however, this won’t get him more votes in 2012 if he was planning on running. We’ll see.

hockey2k5 on November 17, 2008 at 2:50 PM

Again, who is more conservative, Huck or Georgie-Boy?

Al-Ozarka on November 17, 2008 at 2:53 PM

Again, who is more conservative, Huck or Georgie-Boy?

Al-Ozarka on November 17, 2008 at 2:53 PM

Who was more humane, Stalin or Mao?

LevStrauss on November 17, 2008 at 2:55 PM

Hard to face the reality of it, eh, Strauss

Al-Ozarka on November 17, 2008 at 3:01 PM

Fiscal conservatives live in la-la land and think that if the government just got out, everything will be just fine. It won’t. All it does is allow the one who plays the game the best to rule, and the one who plays the game the best will always be the bad guy because he won’t have a self-imposed morality standing in his way. If companies can abuse other people for money they will do it. If people can abuse companies for money they will do it. That is why a balance must be maintained.

Darth Executor on November 17, 2008 at 1:41 PM

Actually, that’s kind of communist.

Count to 10 on November 17, 2008 at 3:02 PM

To whom were you referring: Huckabee or Obama?

Snowed In on November 17, 2008 at 12:55 PM

Huck, but, now that you mention it, either will do.

Count to 10 on November 17, 2008 at 3:09 PM

Huckabee is an embarrassment.

Virginia Shanahan on November 17, 2008 at 3:10 PM

Regardless of whether you liked or disliked Gov. Huckabee, this book is not the act of someone who expects to be taken seriously as a political leader. If he is unwise enough to burn bridges and insult those who would be future allies, he is not the leader we need. I think Gov. Huckabee’s new foray into various medias was exactly what he wanted, mission accomplished.

Cindy Munford on November 17, 2008 at 3:11 PM

litebrite wrote on November 17, 2008 at 2:35 PM:

What’s the big surprise here? All of the Republican candidates loathed Romney and didn’t try to hide it. He’s a phony conservative and still has the wool pulled over many sets of eyes. After Obama won Iowa and was gaining big momentum, guess what Mittens changed his message to? CHANGE!!!! That moment in the campaign sealed my vote against flip-flop Mitt.

You’ve GOT To be kidding me — THAT did it? What did you do when McCain adopted “Change” as well? Vote for Ron Paul?

L.N. Smithee on November 17, 2008 at 3:14 PM

At least Huck signed his name to his petty and undignified, backbiting snark. Anonymous McCain staffers, including the Maverick himself, could take a page from his book.

chunderroad on November 17, 2008 at 3:21 PM

Huck may know the Ten Commandments, but he sure as hell broke the 11th…a Commandment ascribed to Reagan….speak no ill of fellow Republicans.

coldwarrior on November 17, 2008 at 3:29 PM

Regardless of whether you liked or disliked Gov. Huckabee, this book is not the act of someone who expects to be taken seriously as a political leader…I think Gov. Huckabee’s new foray into various medias was exactly what he wanted, mission accomplished.

Cindy Munford on November 17, 2008 at 3:11 PM

I concur. I don’t begrudge the man his right to make a living, and I’ve watched his show. I occasionally find him entertaining, and – less often – astute.

But politically? I would move away from any political entity he happened to be governing. And I say that as a resident of the same state as Barbara Boxer and San Fran Nan.

sulla on November 17, 2008 at 3:32 PM

Huckabee is the last repub I would vote for. I do not trust him at all.

Geochelone on November 17, 2008 at 3:41 PM

Huck is NOT conservative, Romney is a joke. He only “became” non-liberal when he ran for POTUS. Honestly the only ones are Palin, Jindal and maybe a few others that are true. So thats who I hope will leed the repubs. They are the fresh, new faces.

Mercy4Me on November 17, 2008 at 3:42 PM

“Huck may know the Ten Commandments, but he sure as hell broke the 11th…a Commandment ascribed to Reagan….speak no ill of fellow Republicans.”

Name one ‘08 GOP POTUS candidate who didn’t break that commandment.

Al-Ozarka on November 17, 2008 at 3:44 PM

“Huckabee is the last repub I would vote for.”

Perhaps Arlen Spectre will run in ‘12. That should suit your fancy.

Al-Ozarka on November 17, 2008 at 3:46 PM

Umm… What part of this quote is incorrect?

thecollegepolitico on November 17, 2008 at 2:12 PM

The issue isn’t Romney as much as Huck’s rancid obsession with Romney. You can agree with Huck about Romney (and others) and still find Huck a poor candidate in his own right.

Political memoirs tend to fall into three camps: reminiscence, rehabilitation, or revenge. Successful statesmen looking back write the first; unsuccessful candidates looking for another run write the second; and self-absorbed, small-minded fools with axes to grind and bridges to burn write the third.

Mitt’s not writing a tell-all about Huckabee’s flaws or blaming multitudes for his loss in 2008. He may loathe the man as much as Huck loathes him, but Romney doesn’t make a point of it every time he opens his mouth. When the primaries ended, he moved on.

Huck? Not so much.

sulla on November 17, 2008 at 3:47 PM

This thread just goes to show how naive some are to faithfully drink the kool-aid without verifying anything or the context with which it was presented. You people take a few words printed by some left wing media rag, and turn it into an excuse to smear someone. Why not act like intelligent human beings for a change and actually wait for the book to come out and then maybe, just maybe, read the damn thing first.

jparks1972 on November 17, 2008 at 3:51 PM

Yes, folks, please ignore that well-known left wing think-tank, the Cato Institute.
/sarc

Y-not on November 17, 2008 at 3:54 PM

Huck’s antipathy towards Romney is based on anti-Mormonism, and everybody knows it.

WasatchMan on November 17, 2008 at 2:07 PM

AMEN!

In one of the debates as I recall Huck even brought up the fact that Mormons believe that Jesus and Satan are brothers. I couldn’t believe that that had even been brought up in a political debate. All he was trying to do was poison the well with Romney as for as the Christian vote was concerned.

Why even bring that up? I mean, really? It’s not like it is in England where the prime minster pick’s the next Archbishop of Canterbury. The POTUS has no say in how religion is practiced in the United States.

I am Orthodox, I disagree greatly with Mormons, but I would vote for one regardless if I truly believed they were the best person for the job.

RobertInLexington on November 17, 2008 at 3:55 PM

It won’t be necessary to read the book. Gov. Huckabee is a very glib and entertaining speaker and writer, what’s wrong with that. This is the path he has picked and he will probably be more prosperous than he ever imagined. No problem, there are lots of pundits that I enjoy that I wouldn’t vote for. I am sure he appreciates the loyalty of those here who have come to his defense.

Cindy Munford on November 17, 2008 at 3:57 PM

Maybe you prefer the type of government a Club For Growth would give you. I wouldn’t.

Al-Ozarka on November 17, 2008 at 1:51 PM

Actually, I would. It’s one of the three main features of actual conservatism.

The Sunday School Socialism Huck espouses is still socialism, and you can keep it. Start your own party, but the conservative movement was never with you and never will be.

TheUnrepentantGeek on November 17, 2008 at 3:59 PM

This thread just goes to show how naive some are to faithfully drink the kool-aid without verifying anything or the context with which it was presented.

jparks1972 on November 17, 2008 at 3:51 PM

You’ve been drinking the bitter-almond-and-huckleberry Kool-Aid too long. Huck has provided ample context for his bitter screeds against Romney since last December, and his other antics (the Obama Ducks joke at the NRA, his love affair with late-night comics) are legion.

Take off the blinders and find a real candidate to support.

sulla on November 17, 2008 at 4:02 PM

“If we’re going to move the party forward, we need to offer more than personal recriminations.”-Romney spokesman Eric Fehrnstrom

Hi Mr. Kettle, Meet Mr.Pot. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Huckabee just sliced himself with razor blades and jumped in the tank of sharks & Piranha. Why would he put his ranting in print? This is like a long drawn out suicide note for Huckster.

portlandon on November 17, 2008 at 4:08 PM

“Actually, I would. It’s one of the three main features of actual conservatism”

I’m glad you clarified the CFG’s only good in ONE area.

Let’s hang ALL our hopes on that, eh? And hey! Doesn’t the CFG deserve criticism for breaking the 11th commandment?

Al-Ozarka on November 17, 2008 at 4:08 PM

“Take off the blinders and find a real candidate to support.”

Where is he/she? I don’t see him/her. Did he/her make his/her appearance in the ‘08 POTUS race?

Hard to tell with the pundits’ bloodletting.

Al-Ozarka on November 17, 2008 at 4:11 PM

Ages ago – and I do mean ages, when the first Republican Primary debate took place, Huckabee was one of the few that stood out to me. I did not like Romney – I lived in NY while he was Governor of MA, first hand view of his work -, I did not like Paul – too radical -, I did not like Guiliani, for the same same reasons as Romney. I was looking for someone new – Huck seemed to present that for a while, and theologically I agree with him. But the longer I listened the MORE populism I heard, the more class warfare, the more nanny-state government “solutions”. This is not to say that I don’t agree with him on all of his social positions, because I do, what soured me was the class warfare and bashing Romney’s EARNED wealth. I finally gave up on Huck and moved on to another guy – not that it mattered Huck had stayed in long enough to give Johnny Mac the win. Pushing the same ideology that caused many of the social conservatives to stop and re-think him, will not help any future ambitions.

Govgirl on November 17, 2008 at 4:11 PM

When are people going to learn that Huckabee is no consev. he,s as phoney as a 3 dollar bill.He is a smoove talking snake oil selling demmiegod .He is also the main reason we got McCain.He,s out to destroy Gov. Palin and the rebuilding of the consev. movement.(BEWARE OF THE HUCKAPHONEY)

thmcbb on November 17, 2008 at 4:14 PM

Look at Mitt’s record and see if what Huck said wasn’t true.

During his gubernatorial bid, Romney stated that “I believe that abortion should be safe and legal in this country. I have since the time that my mom took that position when she ran in 1970.” “I believe that we should sustain and support Roe v. Wade.” “I’ve been very clear on that – I will preserve and protect a woman’s right to choose and am devoted and dedicated to honoring my word in that regard.”

During his presidential campaign, though, Mitt “changed his mind” and stated his opposition to abortion. Seriously? You hold a position for 30 years and then change it all of a sudden and pretend it’s not for the benefit of your campaign?

You all flocked to Mitt on the suggestion that he was a conservative. That notion was completely and utterly false. Based on his record, he’s as liberal as Ted Kennedy.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not trying to defend Huck. He’s definitely not a conservative either…

Fred 2012?

lutherjw on November 17, 2008 at 4:15 PM

GOVGirl,

Wasn’t it FRED! who stayed in long enough to give McCain the win?

And, RobertinLexington…an enthusiastic “Amen” from a guy who obviously doesn’t have his facts straight.

Al-Ozarka on November 17, 2008 at 4:16 PM

And, RobertinLexington…an enthusiastic “Amen” from a guy who obviously doesn’t have his facts straight.

Al-Ozarka on November 17, 2008 at 4:16 PM

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,316507,00.html

Huckabee asked the question.

RobertInLexington on November 17, 2008 at 4:22 PM

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,316507,00.html

Huckabee asked the question.

RobertInLexington on November 17, 2008 at 4:22 PM

Yeah, but I think Al-Ozarka was referring to the fact that you said it was asked during a debate.

lutherjw on November 17, 2008 at 4:24 PM

Foxnews needs to throw a muzzle on this guy.

Dr B on November 17, 2008 at 4:27 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6


You must be logged in to post a comment.