New Huckabee book rips Mitt, Fred, evangelical leaders, pretty much everyone; Update: Romney camp fires back
posted at 12:04 pm on November 17, 2008 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | regular view
A desperately needed fix of campaign drama during this post-election interregnum detox. Just give me a little hit of score-settling to get me through the day, bro. Just one hit.
Ah, that’s the stuff:
Mitt Romney, Huckabee’s principal rival in Iowa, comes in for the roughest treatment. Huckabee writes that the former Massachusetts governor’s record was “anything but conservative until he changed the light bulbs in his chandelier in time to run for president.” He notes that Romney declined to make a phone call of congratulations after Huckabee beat the oddsmakers to win the Iowa caucuses, “which we took as a sign of total disrespect.” He mocks Romney for suggesting, during one debate, more investment in high-yield stocks as a solution to economic woes. “Let them eat stocks!” Huckabee jokes…
He calls out Pat Robertson, the Virginia-based televangelist, and Dr. Bob Jones III, chancellor of Bob Jones University in South Carolina, for endorsing Rudy Giuliani and Romney, respectively. He also has words for the Texas-based Rev. John Hagee, who endorsed the more moderate John McCain in the primaries, as someone who was drawn to the eventual Republican nominee because of the lure of power. Huckabee speaks to Hagee by phone before the McCain endorsement, while the former Arkansas governor is preparing for a spot on Saturday Night Live. “I asked if he had prayed about this and believed this was what the Lord wanted him to do,” Huckabee writes of his conversation with Hagee. “I didn’t get a straight answer.” Months later, McCain rejected Hagee’s endorsement because of controversial remarks the pastor had made about biblical interpretations.
In a chapter titled “Faux-Cons: Worse than Liberalism,” Huckabee identifies what he calls the “real threat” to the Republican Party: “libertarianism masked as conservatism.” He is not so much concerned with the libertarian candidate Ron Paul’s Republican supporters as he is with a strain of mainstream fiscal conservative thought that demands ideological purity, seeing any tax increase as apostasy and leaving little room for government-driven solutions to people’s problems.
Kudos to Time for a choice selection of representative quotes: Waging low-grade class warfare by sneering at Romney’s wealth and appealing to evangelicals to vote along religious lines is Huck to a T. As is the bit about “government-driven solutions,” of course — this is a guy who once endorsed a federal ban on smoking in workplaces, remember — although that’s qualified by the fact that he’s been a loud and, for most conservatives, righteous opponent of the bailout. Whether that’s because he knows an unpopular issue when he sees one or because an extraordinary intervention in extraordinary circumstances crossed some sort of statist threshold in his mind that ordinary interventions in ordinary circumstances wouldn’t, only he knows. We’ll learn more circa 2010, I imagine.
InstaGlenn will interview him later this week; I eagerly await their exchange on the merits of libertarianism. Exit question: In a Huck/Palin primary showdown, who escapes with the lion’s share of the Christian vote? Don’t answer too hastily. Guilt is, potentially, a factor here.
Update: Another hit on the drama pipe. Mmmmm yeah.
Asked to respond, Romney spokesman Eric Fehrnstrom said Huckabee was acting small.
“This type of pettiness is beneath Mike Huckabee,” Fehrnstrom. “If we’re going to move the party forward, we need to offer more than personal recriminations. Unfortunately, in this book, Mike Huckabee is consumed with presumed slights, and he seems more interested in settling scores than in bringing people together.”
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 3 ... 6 Next »
Huck 2012! Yeah baby!!!!!!!!
marklmail on November 17, 2008 at 12:05 PM
Huckabee’s a freaking Game Show Host
jake-the-goose on November 17, 2008 at 12:05 PM
Huckabee is now the arbiter of conservatism? LOL
bj1126 on November 17, 2008 at 12:08 PM
Oh come on, I think Huck is perfectly suited to be a party chairman. I mean, they’re still looking for somebody to replace Howard Dean…
ErikTheRed on November 17, 2008 at 12:09 PM
Whiny slime. Just what we need to be the face of the Republican party.
LibTired on November 17, 2008 at 12:09 PM
Go to hell, Huck… and by the way, you look like you’re getting fat again.
D2Boston on November 17, 2008 at 12:10 PM
hahahaha, this man is absurd.
And Allah, he only opposes the bailout because he’s a populist, not because he’s a conservative.
I’m sure he’d like 700billion to fund exercise bikes and bibles.
lodge on November 17, 2008 at 12:10 PM
If only I could think of a suitable rhyme for his name. I’ve been through the whole alphabet and nothing seems to do it justice.
LibTired on November 17, 2008 at 12:11 PM
Kini on November 17, 2008 at 12:12 PM
exit question:
Palin.
Huck, the moment you start to legislate morality, you become a lib.. (smoking ban)
DaveC on November 17, 2008 at 12:13 PM
Huckabee will always be the poor, fat boy who grew up jealous of the rich, popular good looking kid.
It’s really embarassing.
ctmom on November 17, 2008 at 12:14 PM
Um, I’ve got news for you Huck. Tax increases and government-driven “solutions” are apostasy.
Lehosh on November 17, 2008 at 12:14 PM
Huckabee’s problem is that he confuses populism with conservatism. That makes him ill-equipped to be the authority on what conservatism actually is.
JohnTant on November 17, 2008 at 12:14 PM
As bad as Obama is, this reminds us that it could have been worse.
phronesis on November 17, 2008 at 12:15 PM
Sarah would wipe the floor with him. Really it wouldnt even be close. He probably wouldnt make it to new hampshire
ousoonerfan15 on November 17, 2008 at 12:15 PM
Buy my book. Please buy my book.
Cockles and mussels..alive, alive oh…
whitetop on November 17, 2008 at 12:16 PM
He says as he writes a book ripping members from all across the right wing.
amerpundit on November 17, 2008 at 12:16 PM
Once again Huck shows he is an empty suit who is jealous of Romney’s wealth.
Conservative Voice on November 17, 2008 at 12:16 PM
The Perfect Man.
Rhinoboy on November 17, 2008 at 12:16 PM
How long until he’s got a show on MSNBC?
jacrews on November 17, 2008 at 12:16 PM
There is a word for people like Huckabee, a faux-conservative & faux-evangelical, when they take others to task for their positions. Hypocrite.
Speaking of which, saw Scott McClellan on C-Span plugging his book at the Miami Book Fair. I could only stand five or so minutes of his whining about being a victim before I had to change the channel.
highhopes on November 17, 2008 at 12:17 PM
Arkansas seems to be a breeding ground for self rightous politicians who play instruments and whine like pigs
HAGGS99 on November 17, 2008 at 12:17 PM
Huck isn’t the right person to be a Conservative. At least that is how I see him. I wasn’t impressed with him running for Pres. As one above said. Sarah would have ripped him. I say NO to Huckabee. Plus, his last name is to odd. (kidding)on last name.
sheebe on November 17, 2008 at 12:18 PM
Ol’ Huck still can’t let bygones by bygones, can he? I hate to say it, but if it had been between Obama and Huck, I don’t know who I would have pulled the lever for.
Huck is a bitter, angry man who hates Romney for some unknown reason that I’ve never figured out. It is personal there, and Huck was the one who started the mudslinging too. Huck also hates Mormons, which is probably the reason I would have pulled the lever for Obama.
Besides, just about anyone I knew who wanted Huckabee WAS the stereotypical “evangelical bigot” the liberals scream about. I’m sure there were sane Huckabee voters–I just never met any. He is washed up, and any suggestion he would be a good candidate in 2012 is ludicrious. I’d rather run Bush 41 again. Or Dole. Heck, even FORD!
Vanceone on November 17, 2008 at 12:18 PM
This born again Souther Baptist rejects the Huckster as the phoney moderate RINO he truly is. Put him on Nugent’s list.
bill30097 on November 17, 2008 at 12:19 PM
Conservatism never equals “government-driven solutions to people’s problems”
“Government-Driven” goes against EVERY PRINCIPLE this country was founded on.
jacrews on November 17, 2008 at 12:19 PM
I warned my conservative friends that Huck was and is a prairie populist.
Now I see that he’s a bitter prairie populist.
Too bad.
I saw him give a great speech the night Sarah Palin accepted the VP nomination in St. Paul.
Now his voice has developed laryngitis.
Again,too bad.
Amendment X on November 17, 2008 at 12:19 PM
Hey AP, I have an exit question for you…
Huck or McCain?
ninjapirate on November 17, 2008 at 12:19 PM
Oh wow – glad I read this Time article. And I was gonna skip work, run out and buy the book and spend the day basking in the wisdom of the Huckster.
Just kidding. Huck is a tool and this is further proof.
HawaiiLwyr on November 17, 2008 at 12:20 PM
Ever seen Huckabee? I watched it once or twice and I gotta tell you, it wouldn’t take much to transplant it to MSNBC. His line-up of guests included Bill Maher and Richard Dreyfuss, who has pushed for charges of impeachment against Bush. And he didn’t exactly get into a O’Reilly-esque argument with Dreyfuss.
amerpundit on November 17, 2008 at 12:20 PM
BTW, libertarianism IS the heart of the Republican Party.
Or least wise it was sometime in the past.
Amendment X on November 17, 2008 at 12:20 PM
What a rube. I thought it decent of Romney to back out once he realized he had no chance of winning; Huck had no such qualms, even if it meant stale-mating Romney.
Andrew D on November 17, 2008 at 12:20 PM
I think you underestimate Obama.
My view of Huck went from “Hey, he’s the best speaker up there” at the early debates, to “If it comes down to Huck vs. Hillary, it will be a hard choice (and not the good kind),” to “I would even vote for Huckabee rather than see Obama as president.”
Count to 10 on November 17, 2008 at 12:21 PM
amputee, guarantee, disagree, potpourri, Tennessee, look-at-me, honey tree, he’s a flea, detainee….
*waits to be entertained*
tehd on November 17, 2008 at 12:21 PM
Look-at-Me Huckabee?
amerpundit on November 17, 2008 at 12:22 PM
Counterquestion: Palin and Huck have campaign apperances at the same time in the same city – who gets the bigger audience? Answer: Sore Loser Huck’s next book would have a chapter smearing Palin.
innominatus on November 17, 2008 at 12:22 PM
This guy’s 15 minutes are o-vuh. When FOX says they are “fair and balanced,” which side of the political teeter-totter do they count HIM on?
VastRightWingConspirator on November 17, 2008 at 12:23 PM
Well I guess this answers the question if Huckster running again. No.
portlandon on November 17, 2008 at 12:23 PM
That was before drug addicts and paranoids started calling themselves “Libertarians.” But Liberty is the heart of the nation, and Republicans are the party of the nation.
Count to 10 on November 17, 2008 at 12:23 PM
Where’s Red Pill when ya need him?
innominatus on November 17, 2008 at 12:24 PM
I can guarantee this will deeply damage him if he wants to run again. He wont win a single state now. Thank goodness!!
ousoonerfan15 on November 17, 2008 at 12:24 PM
Huckaphony that is what he is. Go away and join the Democrats and he would probably do okay.
mariloubaker on November 17, 2008 at 12:24 PM
Go away Huck. A right-wing nanny state is just as bad as a left-wing nanny state.
rbj on November 17, 2008 at 12:24 PM
Palin.
Huck just sealed his own fate.
Oink on November 17, 2008 at 12:25 PM
does the irony of Huck-a-baby calling Romney out as a sore loser for not congratulating him after IA, yet Huckabee is now fueling book sales by quipping one liners about Romney and others?
What a cheese-ball
gatorboy on November 17, 2008 at 12:26 PM
HUCK you Fike!
You are a charlatan, but still likeable.
Saying Romney did not have a Conservative record as Governor but yet acting like it is, coming from you, er, ironic, hilarious and I suppose you have never heard of the “pot calling the kettle black”?
Lay off my man Fred. He will kick your arce
ReaganConservative3 on November 17, 2008 at 12:26 PM
Careful. That’s the 44th president you’re badmouthing. Right, Red Pill?
what is it with Arkansas governors and their bitchy autobiographies?
sulla on November 17, 2008 at 12:26 PM
this guy is bitter with a cajillion chips on his shoulder. what a douche. so romney doesn’t call to congratulate him on the iowa caucus win? who cares? who the hell is huck? i wouldn’t have called either. haha. i thought he’d just go away but then fox had to go and give him a show.
anna on November 17, 2008 at 12:26 PM
Huckabee is a cancer to the Republican party
Zetterson on November 17, 2008 at 12:26 PM
How long ’til Huck starts cracking Palin jokes…oh wait, he’s already done that.
CP on November 17, 2008 at 12:27 PM
Huckabee/McKinney: the Green party ticket in 2012?
tyrfing on November 17, 2008 at 12:27 PM
Jonah called it a year ago: Huck’s a scary right-wing progressive.
pt on November 17, 2008 at 12:27 PM
Allah,
Are you equating “Christian vote” with the evangelical vote?
Huck gives this Catholic the creeps. I doubt many Catholics would vote for him. I’m guessing Lutherans, Episcopalians, and Mormons might have the same reaction.
Huckabee comes across as a bible belt preacher whose focus is on promoting his own position by increasing the size of his congregation. Sarah comes across as a public servant whose focus is serving the voters.
Y-not on November 17, 2008 at 12:28 PM
What a scumbag. This guy had his minions distributing fliers on car windshields at a South Carolina FRED THOMPSON RALLY, saying FRED was pro-abortion and responsible for the murders of 200,000 babies.
The Huckster is beneath contempt.
bigred on November 17, 2008 at 12:28 PM
Keep playing bass.
Until 2013
blatantblue on November 17, 2008 at 12:28 PM
This is why I can never vote for this man. Still, he would have been a better choice than McCain.
Valiant on November 17, 2008 at 12:29 PM
that was my desperation rhyme
I have yet to figure out the point of his tv show
tehd on November 17, 2008 at 12:29 PM
You may be right. I’m still trying to delude myself into thinking Obama will listen to the centrists in his party. He’ll probably disabuse me of this this notion quickly enough, but, even so, I found Hucksters rebranding of populism as conservatism so distasteful I could have never voted for the man.
phronesis on November 17, 2008 at 12:30 PM
I’d love to know why he was so eager to get the Hagee endorsement, which McCain had to end up ditching. I can think of dozens of evangelical endorsers that would be better (and better known!) than an anti-Semite.
Gina on November 17, 2008 at 12:31 PM
C’mon Allahpundit, we all know you were in the bag for Huckabee. Just admit it now and feel the horrible, horrible shame.
BKennedy on November 17, 2008 at 12:32 PM
OK, let’s get all the infighting out of the way by the end of the Primaries, about 3-1/2 years from now…..
DL13 on November 17, 2008 at 12:32 PM
Do you really want us to answer this?
Palin does better, even amoung Evalgelistics, because she doesn’t “shame” down anyones faith.
As Huck does… and tries to get away with it as much as possible.
upinak on November 17, 2008 at 12:32 PM
Huck would’ve smeared Reagan. All he does is give the MSM ammunition. Anything anyone says that is constructive or helps the conservative movement is ignored, so to get attention Huck smears us. Thanks, Schmuckabee!
JustTruth101 on November 17, 2008 at 12:32 PM
Said it before, say it again… the more I see of him the more I dislike him.
*eats*
Grue in the Attic on November 17, 2008 at 12:32 PM
I sadly admit that yes I indeed did vote for this disgrace in the iowa primary last year. But just weeks after and he didnt win anything I realized I should have gone with my head and voted for Mitt.
ousoonerfan15 on November 17, 2008 at 12:33 PM
Clearly, Huckabee thinks he had God’s endorsement.
I’m just a little baffled how Huckabee could spend all that time and effort dividing the GOP for months with his anti-LDS innuendo and then think that Romney owed him a phone call of congratulations. I guess Obama isn’t the only one showing questionable judgement these days.
highhopes on November 17, 2008 at 12:33 PM
Do you people have any idea what Chuck Norris is going to do to you?
marklmail on November 17, 2008 at 12:34 PM
Quite.
Isn’t it annoying how to guy seems so convincing live, but has these nutty positions that pop up later?
Count to 10 on November 17, 2008 at 12:34 PM
Who is this Huckabee fellow….can’t seem to remember him.
David in ATL on November 17, 2008 at 12:34 PM
It’s really sad that Huck can’t get past the Mormon thing. The only reason, the only reason he stayed in the race as long as he did was to keep it from Romney. The sole purpose of Huck’s campaign after NH was to keep the nomination from Romney.
You’re pathetic, Huck. Go away.
crazy_legs on November 17, 2008 at 12:35 PM
Huck’s era was over in November of 2004, when the last compassionate conservative ever was re-elected. He is now poison to the conservative movement, and should be treated as such.
Vashta.Nerada on November 17, 2008 at 12:36 PM
Huckabee’s candidacy enabled McCain to defeat Romney and thus deprived the GOP of the one leader with the economic background, intelligence and communications skills required to explain to the American public the reasons for the financial meltdown.
In the result, an uninformed public concerned about the economy elected a socialist leaning politician with no track record, no real world experience and incredibly poor instincts.
This is Huckabee’s legacy. He needs to STFU.
Basilsbest on November 17, 2008 at 12:37 PM
It’s a commonly accepted practice at HA to portray all Christians as in lock-step agreement on every issue.
I AM an evangelical and social conservative and there was absolutely no way that I was going to support Huckabee and his faux-evangelical facade. Huckabee is a Clinton-like socialist who would have been a disaster as the nominee and an even bigger disaster if actually elected.
highhopes on November 17, 2008 at 12:37 PM
Well, no one has ever accused Huck of having class.
drflykilla on November 17, 2008 at 12:38 PM
I find it offensive that he’s even marginally associated with the Republican party.
anniekc on November 17, 2008 at 12:38 PM
sadly you are probably right about huck staying in just to force votes away from Mitt. I honestly think with this economic disaster Mitt would have defeated barry.
ousoonerfan15 on November 17, 2008 at 12:39 PM
You know whats worse than a secular populist is a religious populist.
Thanks, but no thanks. I’ll take ‘faux’ conservative Rommey any day of the week, before I pull the lever for Huckabee.
Lance Murdock on November 17, 2008 at 12:40 PM
I think I’m 0 for 2 in getting posts through on this thread.
sulla on November 17, 2008 at 12:41 PM
That’s good advice.
BadgerHawk on November 17, 2008 at 12:41 PM
I would like to thank Huck for getting Obama elected.
Romney, the financial turn around wizard, would have taken advatage of the sub prime financial melt down. Obama would have looked like the novice that he is. The melt down would have played into Romney’s hands.
Pro amnesty, big social spender Huck is anything but a conservative himself.
He just hates Mormons. If it had not been for the Mormons prop 8 would have failed in California.
The Rock on November 17, 2008 at 12:41 PM
Shut up! Don’t you know that talk like that only helps Obama? We all need to get behind McCain and support him as if he’s the only hope for the nation because he is! The primaries are over so support McCain- otherwise Obama’s going to win, the Senate will go at least 58 seats to the Democrats, and we won’t even win back the house!
[sorry, knee-jerk reaction after months of the STFU and support McCain sermons from well-meaning HA idiots]
highhopes on November 17, 2008 at 12:42 PM
Huck…nice guy…lousy Presidential material…and this book proves it.
As we have seen with the election of Obama, it takes more than a catchy campaign slogan and an ability to wow the audiences to make for a “good” President.
If and when the GOP finds its roots…and compels ALL GOP candidates from dog catcher to the White House and Congress to abide by these roots (principles) the GOP will throw away its opportunity to end the Obama/Carter 2.0 Presidency in 2012.
Centrist? Pander to the center? Why? Exactly what has the GOP accomplished over the past decade or so pandering to the center? Pandering to the center, trying to be accomodating, trying to rule through “consensus” has done what for the GOP? Simply made it Democrat with different school ties.
The people need leadership, not management. If a candidate for any office fails to understand the difference between leadership and management, they do so at their own peril.
Real leadership. Real solutions. Genuine principles. The only proven way to get government under control.
And the people need to learn that government is NOT the solution for all their problems. A basic principle of Conservatism. Back in the day, when my then wife used to rail about “the government needs to fix this, or fix that” I’d look up and quietly tell her, “I am part of the government. You want people like me to solve all your problems?” That would shut her up for a good while.
coldwarrior on November 17, 2008 at 12:43 PM
All I was gonna say was, please: don’t speak ill of our 44th President. Huck has powerful friends and wields his memoir pen with the tact and generosity we’ve come to expect from Arkansas governors-cum-presidents.
Mock not the child of prophecy!
sulla on November 17, 2008 at 12:44 PM
Maybe the only thing I agree with Huck, is that so many libertarians want to hitch their wagon to the Republican ticket. They want to be a Republican, but they haven’t figured out how to be a Republican and defend our flag…
right2bright on November 17, 2008 at 12:44 PM
Palin
Kevin in Washington State on November 17, 2008 at 12:44 PM
Before I could post on HA, someone here named Huckabee, Huckahu Akbahr or something along those lines. After I picked myself up off the floor from laughing my head off; I pledged to adopt this title and henceforth to refer to the man as “Huckahu Akbahr”. He is a one man demolition machine!
First, I campaigned for Huckahu during his first Governorship run. Some of his former church members warned us he was not the man we thought he was, and would turn on those who once supported him. Viola, Presto, Magic! And he did plant a knife in back of some Conservatives in Arkansas. Does anyone recall Phyliss Schaffley saying he destroyed the GOP in AR? I do. Looks like Huckahu is following a pattern, but now he has reached for the stars, and is attempting to destroy the GOP on a national level.
Second, I have personally communicated during the primaries and general election with Gary Bauer. To say Huckahu is a liar and character assassin when it comes to his slander against Gary is an understatement. Mr. Bauer cares greatly for the family, and is extremely pro-life. What he and others seemed to object to was the fact that Huckahu Akbahr was more about himself during the primaries, and would not get out of the race so someone OTHER THAN McCAIN could possibly win. No one, and I mean no one, believed McCain would be the best nominee, and most knew McCain would not fight Hillary or Obama like the others might. Viola, Presto, Magic! McCain ran an abysmal campaign and indeed did not FIGHT.
In taking up for Rudy, I found that to indeed be expanding the party that Huckahu Akbahr wants expanded. If Bob Jones and Pat Robertson trusted Rudy, and his vows not to block pro-life issues and judges, then that was good enough for me. Rudy, has not given this nation any reason not to trust him any less than any other politician. In fact I would trust him by far more than McCain and Huckahu! His attacking these men of the religious Right is nothing but spiteful, and in direct conflict with the so called Christian values he claims to have.
After Fred got out of the race we became Mitt supporters. As a Conservative, a Christian and a Republican, I have never been so ashamed of the attacks on the Mormon Church and Mitt Romney and his family as I was when I heard the things that were being said by Huckau Akbahr’s emissaries and himself down here in the South. It was despicable! The churches down here were used much as Democrats use Black Churches when campaigning against Republicans. Some very bad things were said in some churches about Mormons and Mitt Romney.
As to his financial and socialistic policies and populist leanings, that in itself is another reason most Conservatives did not like the possibility of Huckahu as POTUS. He wanted to set up a Mexican embassy in Arkansas, and to set up an entire state as a sanctuary for illegals despite our federal laws! Giving preference to illegals regarding college funds, etc. was not Conservative thinking to most of us that opposed him.
I see Huckahu as being in the vein of McCain, but with a religious twist that is more obvious than in McCain. I would like to second the motion to have him replace Howard Dean. He is more of a Democrat than he is a Conservative or a Republican. I hope his book BOMBS! Plus, ten to one he seeks a Senate seat in 2010 and this tv gig is just to tide him over until then.
God Save Us!
freeus on November 17, 2008 at 12:44 PM
Did you pay your 3rd quarter dues?
right2bright on November 17, 2008 at 12:45 PM
Are you guys like 12 years old or what? All I hear is insults and name calling, not my idea of an intelligent discussion, but to each his own.
Why not wait and read the book for yourselves before drinking the kool-aid of a Liberal’s viewpoint and taking it as the gospel? At least that is what most of you said when TIME named Huckabee a top 5 Governor.
Hypocrisy anyone?
jparks1972 on November 17, 2008 at 12:46 PM
maybe he is not such a nice guy. By attacking other GOP leaders he surely knows his presidential hopes are over
ousoonerfan15 on November 17, 2008 at 12:47 PM
You got that right!
Y-not on November 17, 2008 at 12:47 PM
He’s a statist who can’t be taken seriously on any level.
V15J on November 17, 2008 at 12:49 PM
What happened to “Count it all Joy?” A Christian minister badmouthing opponents. A pastor denigrating other Christians for how they voted. Charming.
In my own church we had some who voted for Huckabee because of his ‘Christian cred’. I voted for Romney when I could, McCain when I had to.
Count it all Joy, brothers.
Doug on November 17, 2008 at 12:49 PM
I have never liked Huackabee. Don’t assume there parks… you might get run over by a bible.
upinak on November 17, 2008 at 12:50 PM
Heh. Apparently not.
sulla on November 17, 2008 at 12:50 PM
this evangelical will vote Palin, Rudy, Fred, or Romney over Huck any day of the week..
unless it’s douche bag of the year.
DaveC on November 17, 2008 at 12:51 PM
I don’t need to wait for Obama’s term to finish (or, frankly, to even start) to know that, by his nature, he is incapable of running an administration that will be good for this country.
Same thing with Huck. He demonstrated throughout the primaries and following them that all he cares about is self-promotion. He criticized our nominee during the critical last weeks of the campaign, for pete’s sake, just to sell the idea that he (Huck) was some sort of economics genius and pimp his show.
The excerpt provided, coupled with his pattern of behavior, are all I need to know he is bad news.
Y-not on November 17, 2008 at 12:52 PM
JustTruth101 on November 17, 2008 at 12:52 PM
as someone said before. Sarah has NEVER attacked people of other religion’s for their personal beliefs. It is really disgraceful what huck is doing.
ousoonerfan15 on November 17, 2008 at 12:52 PM
Allah,
Evangelicals are a distinct, sub-group of the Christian vote. Fundamental evangelicals were big supporters for Huckabee, but not many others in the sub-group. His social positions resonate with many evangelicals, but so do Sarah Palin’s positions.
The “Christian vote” is not shamed by “guilt” to vote for someone because some political insider says so. 2012 is a loooong ways away. As a group, we are a forgiving bunch and forget well; each day is a new beginning. Whether Palin is still a contender remains to be seen (I do hope so), but I think this “tell-all” book (based on the quotes) by Huckabee will not be viewed favorably by evangelicals in particular, and will raise many questions and doubts about him. There’s a bit of “do as I say, not as I do” here (forgiveness, charity, humility, etc.).
Also, Huckabee’s amnesty/illegal immigration sealed his fate with many voting blocks–some evangelicals, many Christians, and most, if not all, Conservatives.
conservative pilgrim on November 17, 2008 at 12:53 PM
Comment pages: 1 2 3 ... 6 Next »