Palin: I’m ready to help Obama even though he is, in fact, friendly with a domestic terrorist
posted at 5:30 pm on November 12, 2008 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | regular view
My sentiments exactly. It’s in two clips, submitted for your approval below.
In case you’re keeping score, total number of Democrats thus far who’ve expressed even the tiniest reservations about Obama’s chumminess with this unrepentant piece of shinola: One.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
You fear her don’t you? Be afraid very afraid.
Geochelone on November 12, 2008 at 6:25 PM
See how smoothly she called out Obama on his promise to run a bipartisan administration and then offered her support if he needed help to do it. Man what a legend throwing down a challenge like that before Obama even takes office.
Dreadnought223 on November 12, 2008 at 6:25 PM
Just when I think I couldn’t possible love her any more than I already do — she goes and says something awesome again.
jonezee on November 12, 2008 at 6:26 PM
Thanks for the tender wakeup and breakfast hon.
Bradky on November 12, 2008 at 6:26 PM
Eat it, troll.
HornetSting on November 12, 2008 at 6:27 PM
Spot on, HornetSting
The brilliance is dazzling. I’m overcome. Pass the Mylanta.
kingsjester on November 12, 2008 at 6:27 PM
LMAO – so many retorts so richly deserved but I’ll take the high ground today.
Bradky on November 12, 2008 at 6:28 PM
Wrong, She has to prove herself to the american people. She will have a couple of years to get ready if she decides to run. Most of the base will evaluate her in the campaign trail to see if she deserves votes.
No one is a given.. She has to prove herself and we all know that..
Palinpuma on November 12, 2008 at 6:29 PM
Let’s nominate Palin for queen of the world while we are at it.
Bradky on November 12, 2008 at 6:30 PM
Bradky on November 12, 2008 at 6:28 PM
Do you need a map? I haven’t seen you THERE before. Reference your first comment.
kingsjester on November 12, 2008 at 6:30 PM
No disagreement – good sentiment.
Bradky on November 12, 2008 at 6:31 PM
Aren’t they offering free Che shirts over at the Kos? They called, they are missing their idiot in their village, you better call home.
Did I stutter?
HornetSting on November 12, 2008 at 6:31 PM
If Obama had half a brain , he would put her in charge of DOE and drill .
When the oil price falls to 20 dollars a barrel , Putin , Chavez and dinnerjacket would be looking for “dialog” and kissing his feet.
He would be reelected.
the_nile on November 12, 2008 at 6:31 PM
Yes often.
Bradky on November 12, 2008 at 6:32 PM
I hope we don’t get complacent and NOT drill because oil is so cheap, like Bubba did in the 90’s.
We don’t WANT Obama re-elected. Wanna make sure that is clear.
HornetSting on November 12, 2008 at 6:34 PM
Gov Palin shows how bipartianship is done. says we have problems with Obama but if working together benefits the entire nation we will swallow our disagreements for the common good.
BHO the ball is in your court.
unseen on November 12, 2008 at 6:35 PM
I hope we don’t get complacent and NOT drill because oil is so cheap, like Bubba did in the 90’s.
We don’t WANT Obama re-elected. Wanna make sure that is clear.
HornetSting on November 12, 2008 at 6:34 PM
Hello? One of the first things BHO is going to do is reinstate the EO on offshore drilling. He liked gas at $4.00/gal wa sjus tupset it got there so quickly. The $4.00/gal gas is going to cost taxpayers $50-$100b in bailout money for the suto makers, Almost $1 trillion for the banks but you know $4.00/gal was ok by BHO. In Obamaland unicorns will make it all better.
unseen on November 12, 2008 at 6:37 PM
then she brings up the Ayers thing yet again. She knows obama is not going to ask for her help – it looks good to the Palinmaniacs but rather transparent to everyone else.
Bradky on November 12, 2008 at 6:37 PM
Dang, gotta go burn dinner.
Someone on another thread said they were Sarah-ed out. Not me! I reiterate that I find Drywall entertaining. BTW: Dinner is pork tenderloin in a wine/portabella sauce. Gonna pretend it’s moose stew!
Chewy the Lab on November 12, 2008 at 6:38 PM
He won’t do it. He is on a mission and needs the confidantes in lockstep. She would be a fantastic asset but her star would rise with a high-profile appointment and he can’t have that!!! His ego is too big to share the stage with anyone (remember Grant Park).
sherry on November 12, 2008 at 6:39 PM
Yes, I know unseen. The thing is…..now that gas is under $3, the increase in gas prices will be blamed on…I know, Bush. But, if we are smart, we can blame it on the president obmama, the democratic controlled congress and senate…..attacks to the wallet are serious business.
We just need a good “propaganda director” like the dems.
HornetSting on November 12, 2008 at 6:40 PM
SHE didn’t .
the_nile on November 12, 2008 at 6:41 PM
HornetSting on November 12, 2008 at 6:40 PM
You are right. If he reinstates the ban, everybody will se it in their pocketbooks. It will be very difficult to spin that. People will doubt the Bush accusation, because the prices were going down before the ban was reinstated.
kingsjester on November 12, 2008 at 6:43 PM
Fixed it for you.
portlandon on November 12, 2008 at 6:43 PM
something tells me that this rywally guy would probably start crying if the Cuda ever entered his home
joey24007 on November 12, 2008 at 6:45 PM
Fixed it for you
Bradky on November 12, 2008 at 6:45 PM
We can understand it, but what about the 52 million idiots that voted for obmama? They will believe ANYTHING!
Drill here, drill now, impeach….uh, nevermind.
HornetSting on November 12, 2008 at 6:46 PM
Hopefully he will , yes a long shot , but the mess the world is in right now it could use some bipartisan work.
the_nile on November 12, 2008 at 6:46 PM
thanks for the laugh. I came home dragging this evening and that was just what I needed.
johnnyU on November 12, 2008 at 6:47 PM
There Fixed YOU for you.
portlandon on November 12, 2008 at 6:47 PM
good for her, offer to help, but don’t buy into surrendering your attacks.
rob verdi on November 12, 2008 at 6:49 PM
HornetSting on November 12, 2008 at 6:46 PM
Y’know, kiddo, after viewing the Trolls’ posts, maybe I am overestimating the intelligence of some of the American people.
kingsjester on November 12, 2008 at 6:50 PM
I hate to be pessimistic but I think it will only extend as far as Hagel, Lugar and I’m stretching to include Powell.
sherry on November 12, 2008 at 6:51 PM
I blame the education system. Leave no idiot behind.
HornetSting on November 12, 2008 at 6:53 PM
Dave Rywall & Bradky… I always find it funny which which trolls (snerts for pre-outsourcing aol people) thread runners leave to keep the comments rolling. In this case the real issue with the one’s trolls is they all have the mental capability of a thimble. Keep plugging at dave and brad…
——————
Palinpuma on November 12, 2008 at 6:29 PM
Very true she does have to prove herself, but people need to see that in the past 72 hours we have learned more about Gov. Palin than we have learned about the one in 2 years.
brianpierre on November 12, 2008 at 6:54 PM
Typical Democrat. She must be confusing Sarah Palin with Hillary.
The DNC and surrogates and sycophants do not agree. Thus, the massive pre-emptive slime job.
ddrintn on November 12, 2008 at 6:55 PM
Maybe one her staff needs to say “Pssst Governor, you lost the election. It’s not your call.” to which she would reply “Holy Moose Cakes. Why didn’t Senator McCain tell me that?” staff person: “Do you remember being on the stage with him in Arizona the evening of the 4th?” palin: “You betcha! But I guess we need to examine the meaning of the word concede”
Bradky on November 12, 2008 at 6:55 PM
At the very least he’ll have some RINO’s so he can redistribute the BLAME.
Mojave Mark on November 12, 2008 at 6:56 PM
This is best post I have seen all day. You have summed it all up in one sentence.
portlandon on November 12, 2008 at 6:56 PM
That sound you hear is a snow machine sneaking up on you ;)
aikidoka on November 12, 2008 at 6:59 PM
CNN Poll Vote. Did Palin cost McCain the election?
http://tinyurl.com/l2t0
Palinpuma on November 12, 2008 at 6:59 PM
I believe strong woman make you shriver with inadequacy…make you small…don’t they?
Steinbeck on November 12, 2008 at 7:00 PM
You have to stop and wonder where Palin would be if McCain hadn’t given her the tap. Is there more of these wonderful conservatives hiding somewhere??? Just a few months ago, she was the unknown (at least to me).Love her!
DJ from MA on November 12, 2008 at 7:06 PM
Note to John McCain: This is the kind of rhetoric you should be using instead of lauding Obama and Biden as wonderful people who would do a good job too.
Note to John McCain apologists who are defending the way he threw Palin under the bus when his staffers started dishing lies to the MSM. We now know who the man was on the ticket.
highhopes on November 12, 2008 at 7:18 PM
This woman is fearless. You rock, sister. Make us proud.
Philly on November 12, 2008 at 7:21 PM
I think it’s pretty clear. Palin is looking at the Obama planned government of radical leftists and imagining she is going to have an opportunity to hammer O in the future for his too far left, disastrous programs that the nation should have known by his relationships was going to occur.
Plus, Bill Ayers and Rev. Wright are busily being rehab’d by the press so they can show up in Obama’s life or be part of his history without screwing his legacy. Unfortunately for these gentleman, they are too ideologically steeped in their own BS and will say something in the next few years.
Palin is betting on that.
Kat_Mo on November 12, 2008 at 7:21 PM
I really don’t think it a defense of McCain, just a belief that Palin will be better served and come out of this in a stronger position if she defends herself. Not that you were speaking to me spefically highhopes, it’s just how I feel about it. I think anyone appearing to come to the “rescue” of Palin will only be used by the MSM to portray her as weak by needing to be “rescued” and have something else to bash her with. But, if she handles this herself, it will only make her more credible to more people. Which I think she is perfectly capable of doing.
Hog Wild on November 12, 2008 at 7:26 PM
Ie she answered the question.
Spirit of 1776 on November 12, 2008 at 7:26 PM
One of Palin’s best talents is slapping with one hand while smiling and offering the other hand out to help. Palin you rock-stay strong.
canditaylor68 on November 12, 2008 at 7:30 PM
Fact of the matter is the tally would have been even more dismal for McCain without Palin (even the CNN poll at this point says that).
McCain was a bad choice from the beginning foisted on the party by idiots who wanted to make this about “electability” over principle. They thought McCain would be an easy win over Hillary Clinton and didn’t even stop to consider that somebody else would get the not. Some of these idiots (Wise_men for example) were downright dishonorable in their defense of McCain over real Republicans. These evil people cost any chance the GOP had this election cycle. In retrospect I honestly think many, including Wise_men, were really operatives for Obama.
The way ahead for 2010 and 2012 is to take a principled stand. That strategy dictates purging the party of many of these worthless idiots who value electability over true conservative values. To win the GOP needs to rally the base and you can’t do that with the political traitors, Judases, and Quisling from the McCain wing of the party.
highhopes on November 12, 2008 at 7:30 PM
You need in excess of 60 million votes to win the election. Do you honestly think there are 60 million self-professed conservatives?
Bradky on November 12, 2008 at 7:33 PM
then she brings up the Ayers thing yet again. She knows obama is not going to ask for her help – it looks good to the Palinmaniacs but rather transparent to everyone else.
Bradky on November 12, 2008 at 6:37 PM
Ayers is someone that should be brought up. He is a concern to many of us. All of The Dictator’s friends. You must be a Dictator fan. You sound real scared of a Woman. You should be.
sheebe on November 12, 2008 at 7:33 PM
That is an excellent point that I hadn’t considered.
Where I fault McCain is not telling his people to knock it off when they start attacking Palin as anonymous sources for the MSM feeding frenzy. Sure they are bitter at the loss and had no love for Palin in the first place but dishing untrue or misstated events to Carl Cameron without attribution is nothing but low-class thuggery. McCain brought Palin onto the ticket. He at least owes her enough to stop HIS people from trashing her character.
highhopes on November 12, 2008 at 7:36 PM
I think there’s a decent chance she asked McCain to stay mum on this topic, just like McCain clearly asked Bush to steer clear of his campaign — to avoid guilt by association.
I do think that McCain comes off as a very inept boss to not chastise his staffers for running their mouths, so for that reason alone I have lost respect for him.
Y-not on November 12, 2008 at 7:38 PM
Jindal is going to be on Greta tonight. Guess the ‘Cuda’s not the only governor playing for 2012 this week.
And guess who else is chatting with Greta? Rick Davis to respond to the ‘Cuda/Greta interview.
meltenn on November 12, 2008 at 7:39 PM
Gee it is gonna be really hard to break free from the ‘Cuda drug.
Proper weaning is necessary in case she fades to a lesser degree. Naah, Sarah will you adopt us? :D *rumbling sound of HotAir members with families and friends*
ProudPalinFan on November 12, 2008 at 7:49 PM
Go back to the Kos Kids with that kind of moronic mis-labeling followed by moral outrage. Self-professed conservatives???? What the hell is a self-professed conservative? This isn’t an AA meeting where you need to admit to yourself and others that you are an alcoholic!
There are at least 60 million voters who would support the traditional conservative values of smaller and limited government, lower taxes and federal spending, and the culture of life over the left’s culture of death. That doesn’t mean all of them are “self-professed conservatives” (see how stupid that is?).
The GOP in 2008 didn’t give the voters enough of a choice to make a distinction. Republicans didn’t run a conservative they ran a Democrat wannabe who was, essentially, running to the right of the Democrat party instead of appealing to the GOP base. Republicans went out and voted for McCain but they voting for the least objectionable liberal. McCain never enjoyed the grassroots enthusiasm and passion that was key in GWB’s elections. True to McCain’s mom, they held their nose and voted for McCain but they didn’t put out the signs, raise the money, stuff envelopes, or do all the other stuff that was clearly necessary this election to beat back an empty suit with a “historic” twist.
It’s a message you can take back to all the other self-professed moonbats who are lurking in the HA belfry.
highhopes on November 12, 2008 at 7:49 PM
Why the Palin mockery, B?
Jaibones on November 12, 2008 at 7:52 PM
we are going to have a ‘Cuda story of the week once Obama introduces the misery index
joey24007 on November 12, 2008 at 7:53 PM
Drink the koolaid deeply. Palin begins white house bid 4 years before the election.
As to your comment about being scared I would submit that the people who are afraid of objective looks at people are the scared ones.
Ayers has been brought up. I don’t like him but Obama was elected — time to get over it. Maybe…. try sticking to the policy differences.
Bradky on November 12, 2008 at 7:53 PM
Ooh, ooh, let me take this one!
Yes!
What do I win?
Jaibones on November 12, 2008 at 7:54 PM
Wolf Blitzer brought up Ayers.
CanadianGuy on November 12, 2008 at 7:54 PM
I’ll let the self-professed go for now. But the answer to the question is yes, and there will be many more in 2012 after you all are done with barracks training, high taxes, renting, year-long job searches, and empty promises. Feel free to consider enrolling now and save yourself the agony. Mandatory jumping-jacks are a bitch.
sherry on November 12, 2008 at 7:56 PM
well she has pledged to do more for those with special needs so you might benefit from this
joey24007 on November 12, 2008 at 7:56 PM
Bobby Jindal is already starting visits to Iowa. According to the New Orleans Times-Picayune, Bobby saw that it wasn’t in his best interests to attach himself to McCain’s losing ticket. I’m more inclined to think that Jindal is shrewd enough to understand that he needed to be better positioned politically to come off as anything other the “Indian guy” on McCain’s ticket to offset the “multi-racial guy.”
In short, Jindal is a real contender for 2012. It appears he will be using these four years to position himself within the party, get a track record of experience, raise money and supporters, and otherwise do all the things Palin didn’t have the chance to do before the media attacked her (and complained that they hadn’t been able to vet her before her nomination).
highhopes on November 12, 2008 at 7:57 PM
It is more a mockery of the Palin fever. She hasn’t proven herself to my satisfaction yet. And call it old school but it is a little presumptuous to declare her the chosen one as some are doing — thought we looked down on that with Obama. There may be a better candidate than her.
As to what do you win… I went to the link. Are you saying that every person who voted for Bush was a conservative? I didn’t see it on the page but if you did point me to the general paragraph.
Bradky on November 12, 2008 at 7:59 PM
That all sounds about right. I don’t think Palin will be in a position to run for the top of the ticket, and I wonder if anyone will risk her in a VP slot. Four years is a long time, I suppose.
Jaibones on November 12, 2008 at 8:00 PM
Agreed on Palin, but I feel like praising her, not mocking her. If the mockery is for those who would have her running for President in four years, I agree – I can’t see it.
As for the link, yes: 62 million votes for Bush, and no, they’re not all conservatives, but they all thought Bush was.
Jaibones on November 12, 2008 at 8:02 PM
Got it about the election. As for Palin I’m open minded enough to see what she has to say but four years of CUDA! in every thread is going to drive me back to hard liquor.
Bradky on November 12, 2008 at 8:05 PM
Well done, wasn’t it! Speaking more slowly might support a more statesmanship presentation. But it’s clear, now that Team McCain no longer muzzles her, that her brain is waaay ahead of her mouth, not to mention ahead of those in MSM who presume to interview her.
petefrt on November 12, 2008 at 8:07 PM
Respect The ‘Cuda. Dems and RINOs are terrified of her.
BOR’s coverage of her is interesting. Kinky says women’s groups did not defend ‘Cuda or Hillary. He’s right.
Philly on November 12, 2008 at 8:07 PM
There is nothing, let me repeat, NOTHING, more exciting to Progressives than watching conservatives foam at the mouth over Sarah Palin. Seriously? We LOVE her. Why? Because she epitomizes everything that’s wrong with the GOP and why they will never appeal to anyone under the age of 40 (and soon to be 50) ever again.
Yes, I know, you “love” her. You think she’s “hot”. She’s “just like you.” She’s not “elitist.” Think about what all that really means though. You are telling the rest of America that the President shouldn’t be exceptional, they should just be…nice and friendly and someone you would see everyday.
I think most Americans want an exceptional President. They want an intelligent President. And the MSM isn’t the one who makes her constantly mangle the English language and just make up words (progressing?!?!) what is that? Sarah Palin will win rural areas. But she won’t win suburban areas and thus, she won’t win the Presidency.
DeathToMediaHacks on November 12, 2008 at 8:13 PM
There will be after four years of O’Bozo.
Now be gone with yourself troll.
DeweyWins on November 12, 2008 at 8:16 PM
Man, check out the pics of the ‘Cuda from the RGA today. Reporters and security (both local PD and what I guess is her personal security detail from Alaska)all around. It must take some getting used to to have security around all the time, and to know why they’re there (ie that there are crazy people who would like to actually do you physical harm).
meltenn on November 12, 2008 at 8:16 PM
You know that Reagan is just too damn conservative to win … he is like a cowboy running around telling the world that the U.S. will be in charge
plus he only seems to get his message across to those low class folks who believe in “patriotism”
what we need is Gerald Ford in this election … he has what it takes to bring in the moderates, he has what it takes to bring in the “educated”
Ford is the future of the GOP … this Reagan will be a disaster
joey24007 on November 12, 2008 at 8:17 PM
Rest assured you can stay on the Kos Kool-Aid. Like Obama is an unworthy vessel for a lofty ideal, Palin is a stand in for real Repbulicans fighting for conservative values at all levels of government.
In both cases, the reality is going to fall far short of the hype. In Palin’s case, that means a more realistic assessment. In Obama’s case the fall is going to be hard as the reality doesn’t match the hype and promises. IMO, the press and many Obama supporters will start to fall away by June 2008 as vague broad statements are interrupted by running a nation at war with economic problems at home. Blaming Bush will work for a while but come 2012, Obama will (for the first time in his terrorist-criminal-racist supporting political life) have a track record of his own.
Take that too back to your fellow moonbats.
highhopes on November 12, 2008 at 8:18 PM
Then leave and stop complaining. Why hang around in the threads about Palin complaining about you don’t want to hear about her. That’s just proving your a Troll.
the_nile on November 12, 2008 at 8:20 PM
I don ‘t know about you, but I am impatient with those Republicans who after the last election rushed into print saying, “We must broaden the base of our party”—when what they meant was to fuzz up and blur even more the differences between ourselves and our opponents.
- The Gipper
joey24007 on November 12, 2008 at 8:22 PM
Sarah Palin is like the second-string QB who comes into the Super Bowl after the first-stringer is injured during the second quarter and her team is trailing by three touchdowns. She moves the ball down the field consistently for the remainder of the game and scores points on almost every possession but eventually Obama holds on to win by a touchdown. Pundits consider Sarah a ‘natural’ talent who shows great promise and that she has a great future if she ever becomes a first-stringer. Folks, Sarah is now the first-stringer. The ball is now in her court. I believe she will now run with it. When was the last time that a losing Republican candidate in a Presidential election has had a 91% approval rating from her own party? Maybe never!
technopeasant on November 12, 2008 at 8:24 PM
Bradky thinks somebody asked for his lame opinion. “She hasn’t proven herself to me.” She already has a husband, loser!
What kind of a name is Bradky? Do you have friends named Chas and Tyler? Do you wear a bow tie and suspenders?
All you do is bash the ‘Cuda and rag on so-cons. Go bother the Dems with that nonsense. If you don’t support all three legs of the conservative movement (and Sarah Palin has a nice pair) then you’re out of touch with the base. If you have a problem with strong women, then crawl back under your rock.
chunderroad on November 12, 2008 at 8:25 PM
pair of legs = bad pun = fiscal / social conservative
chunderroad on November 12, 2008 at 8:26 PM
Not being a elitist isn’t the same as being incompetent , elitism is when you despise ordinary people.
You don’t want a English professor for potus , neither a true rocket scientist. You want a get-it-done person.
the_nile on November 12, 2008 at 8:29 PM
I bought myself a present tonight – the good stuff – just to salve my wounds. The Dennis Prager column brightened my spirits – I had been in full dudgeon. I even went to that silly 52-48 web site and commented as an “Angry” Republican.
I basically told the libs “GFY; you could have done this 8 years ago if that’s how you felt.” So, I’m better now.
And the Woodford Reserve will help.
Jaibones on November 12, 2008 at 8:29 PM
But Obama won, so how does that fit into your logic.
sherry on November 12, 2008 at 8:32 PM
Heh.
Jaibones on November 12, 2008 at 8:33 PM
I do not favor Sarah because she is ‘hot’, not an elitist or a mother of five. I favor Sarah because she is authentic, charismatic, and a huge vote-getter, is an advocate of conservative principles, and has the backbone and wisdom of Reagan and Thatcher.
technopeasant on November 12, 2008 at 8:34 PM
Comment of the week
joey24007 on November 12, 2008 at 8:35 PM
Hey, Bradky, I missed the beginning of the thread, so let me go on record as being 5 x 5 with Allah (!) and with the lovely Governor on the subject of Ayers. Yes, the silly Wolf is the one who brought it up, and yes, her answer was spot-on.
And yes, Allah is spot-on as he reminds the pathetic liberals and nitwit Democrats that exactly one of them has admitted to being troubled by a President who pals around with a guy who set off bombs in police stations, the Capitol Building, and the Pentagon.
One. It’s the loneliest number.
Jaibones on November 12, 2008 at 8:37 PM
Too late..Barney Frank already has the title. Or was that obama? I don’t know. I get the ladies mixed up on this one.
I know one is geh, and the other is named barney. Or is that ‘w’s dog?
Damn now I’m really confused.
I’m bummed if ‘W’s Dog is geh…
>:)
Handel on November 12, 2008 at 8:37 PM
You owe me a new computer screen! LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Thanks for the laugh! I need one every single day as we count down to destruction. LOL!
freeus on November 12, 2008 at 8:38 PM
The Rock.
She’s the toughest politician to enter the field in a long, long, time.
Suck on it, Leftists.
Saltysam on November 12, 2008 at 8:42 PM
Ha! I missed that.
Jaibones on November 12, 2008 at 8:43 PM
Can you define ordinary people to me? Because I don’t really know how you can claim Obama “despises” ordinary people? Is this entirely based on “bittergate” because…Americans looked at that comment, they heard it blasted at them over and over during Spring and if they stumbled near a talk radio station they also heard it. This is the thing that’s so silly about claiming that Obama “despises” ordinary Americans. You ultimately have to be saying that ordinary Americans are stupid for voting for him don’t you? And isn’t THAT kind of elitist?
Or is the claim that the 60+ million Americans who voted for him are not “ordinary” is that the claim? It’s just such a ridiculous partisany hacky thing to assume. Obama doesn’t despise “ordinary Americans” he may “despise” conservative policies, but according to the amount of people who think the country is on the wrnog track, so do most Americans.
DeathToMediaHacks on November 12, 2008 at 8:52 PM
Despise may be too strong a word. I think looks down upon them is better. The bitter clingers clip proves it.
CanadianGuy on November 12, 2008 at 8:55 PM
Elitists don’t nessiarily despise ordinary people, they just think that they are better than them.
Dreadnought223 on November 12, 2008 at 8:56 PM
The gerund of the verb “to progress”, as in “Hack is not progressing well in learning to think critically”.
ProfessorMiao on November 12, 2008 at 8:59 PM
Polishing up on her media skills in paying off for the Gov. Palin, and nice to see her throw alittle sarcasim his way to say hey!… stop throwing trash out on my family!. lol
Looking forward to seein her in 2010- in some form or another
GO Cuda GO
hawkman on November 12, 2008 at 9:00 PM
And think they know whats best for them , leads to socialism fast.
the_nile on November 12, 2008 at 9:00 PM
No James23, not merely “good.” We’re witnessing the greatest politician in our lifetimes. Each generation gets one Truly dynamic Great politician.
Lincoln. Then Teddy Roosevelot. Our Parent’s had Eisenhower. Our older brothers and sisters had Ronald Reagan.
We’ve got Sarah Palin. And damned am I happy about it. She’s all those past American heros all wrapped up in one.
ericdondero on November 12, 2008 at 9:03 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 Next »