<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steele: The way back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/11/steele-the-way-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/11/steele-the-way-back/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:50:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: joe_doufu</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/11/steele-the-way-back/comment-page-2/#comment-1637812</link>
		<dc:creator>joe_doufu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=34085#comment-1637812</guid>
		<description>A friend made a good point to me today that Steele might be better than Newt simply because Newt is so generally hated and despised by non-Republicans. Steele might therefore be a better spokesperson for a new GOP. I have a hard time deciding which one of them would be better, frankly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend made a good point to me today that Steele might be better than Newt simply because Newt is so generally hated and despised by non-Republicans. Steele might therefore be a better spokesperson for a new GOP. I have a hard time deciding which one of them would be better, frankly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saltysam</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/11/steele-the-way-back/comment-page-2/#comment-1637286</link>
		<dc:creator>Saltysam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 02:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=34085#comment-1637286</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;- if he were to articulate his policy preferences, this crowd would find much to discuss.

Jaibones on November 11, 2008 at 12:54 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Help us out JB. What the heck are they, anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>- if he were to articulate his policy preferences, this crowd would find much to discuss.</p>
<p>Jaibones on November 11, 2008 at 12:54 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Help us out JB. What the heck are they, anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saltysam</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/11/steele-the-way-back/comment-page-1/#comment-1637273</link>
		<dc:creator>Saltysam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 02:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=34085#comment-1637273</guid>
		<description>If the GOP wants to win, I suggest that the entire primary/caucus vote take place on one day. And make it one week after the DNC has their convention.

We&#039;d never lose again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the GOP wants to win, I suggest that the entire primary/caucus vote take place on one day. And make it one week after the DNC has their convention.</p>
<p>We&#8217;d never lose again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steele in the WSJ: &#8220;Listen. Adapt. Be Positive.&#8221; at Buried Planet</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/11/steele-the-way-back/comment-page-1/#comment-1636536</link>
		<dc:creator>Steele in the WSJ: &#8220;Listen. Adapt. Be Positive.&#8221; at Buried Planet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=34085#comment-1636536</guid>
		<description>[...] Hot Air comes today&#8217;s piece in the WSJ by former Maryland Lt. Governor Michael Steele. Steele makes a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hot Air comes today&#8217;s piece in the WSJ by former Maryland Lt. Governor Michael Steele. Steele makes a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trigon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/11/steele-the-way-back/comment-page-1/#comment-1636519</link>
		<dc:creator>trigon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=34085#comment-1636519</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;We hear people clamoring for the same MoveOn/Code Pink tactics rather than fixing our own house and offering a positive alternative to the liberal government we’ll endure for the next two years, at least.

-----------------------------------------------


I don’t see those two activities as mutually exclusive.

Lehosh on November 11, 2008 at 12:35 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This is a good point. We need a Moveon-type organization, or complex of organizations. It should be well-funded and respond within hours to whatever inanity the Dims manage to come up with. It should create simple, powerful commercials that question what the they are doing or illustrate the consequences of what they do or attempt to do. They should do this relentlessly.

Let&#039;s face it. The Code Pinkers are stupid, obnoxious and frankly, so ugly they&#039;re scary. We need a group of people that are attractive and &#039;hip&#039;. They shouldn&#039;t just be popping up and screaming. They should be doing actions that mock the Dims. (We all know they have no sense of humor). Make fun of them. Do political theater. Have them take actions that amuse and educate. Get people thinking.

We shouldn&#039;t just copycat. We need to build a better mousetrap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>We hear people clamoring for the same MoveOn/Code Pink tactics rather than fixing our own house and offering a positive alternative to the liberal government we’ll endure for the next two years, at least.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>I don’t see those two activities as mutually exclusive.</p>
<p>Lehosh on November 11, 2008 at 12:35 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>This is a good point. We need a Moveon-type organization, or complex of organizations. It should be well-funded and respond within hours to whatever inanity the Dims manage to come up with. It should create simple, powerful commercials that question what the they are doing or illustrate the consequences of what they do or attempt to do. They should do this relentlessly.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s face it. The Code Pinkers are stupid, obnoxious and frankly, so ugly they&#8217;re scary. We need a group of people that are attractive and &#8216;hip&#8217;. They shouldn&#8217;t just be popping up and screaming. They should be doing actions that mock the Dims. (We all know they have no sense of humor). Make fun of them. Do political theater. Have them take actions that amuse and educate. Get people thinking.</p>
<p>We shouldn&#8217;t just copycat. We need to build a better mousetrap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amazing Grace</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/11/steele-the-way-back/comment-page-1/#comment-1636327</link>
		<dc:creator>Amazing Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 23:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=34085#comment-1636327</guid>
		<description>Sheebe--WELCOME, glad to have you. On the Steele subject, I think he&#039;d be just fine. The only problem I see is the other side with all their uncle Tom stuff. It would be hard for him, but then we are made of sterner stuff than that. I think part of our problem was there were to few of our leaders willing to really fight back. You never hear the Dems. speaking evil of each other, but we do all the time. Personally, I see it as a badge of courage to be disliked by the DEms. This is going to be a fight. A bloody fight, and the power at the moment is all on their side. I am encouraged with the polls that say the people are still right of center in their views but upset that we lost our way. Well our leaders did, I didn&#039;t. Neither did you. I guess we just have to hang in there and hide our guns till there needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sheebe&#8211;WELCOME, glad to have you. On the Steele subject, I think he&#8217;d be just fine. The only problem I see is the other side with all their uncle Tom stuff. It would be hard for him, but then we are made of sterner stuff than that. I think part of our problem was there were to few of our leaders willing to really fight back. You never hear the Dems. speaking evil of each other, but we do all the time. Personally, I see it as a badge of courage to be disliked by the DEms. This is going to be a fight. A bloody fight, and the power at the moment is all on their side. I am encouraged with the polls that say the people are still right of center in their views but upset that we lost our way. Well our leaders did, I didn&#8217;t. Neither did you. I guess we just have to hang in there and hide our guns till there needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Steele for RNC Chair : Stop The ACLU</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/11/steele-the-way-back/comment-page-1/#comment-1635924</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Steele for RNC Chair : Stop The ACLU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=34085#comment-1635924</guid>
		<description>[...] Ed Morrissey:  Steele evokes Ronald Reagan, as so many do, in hearkening back to the principles that transformed the Republican Party into a force for liberty and reform. We’re fortunate to have both Steele and Gingrich to guide us out of the wilderness in this fashion, but Steele may represent the future of the party better than Gingrich as the head of the GOP in the next few years. I look forward to hearing more from both as to their vision on revamping the technological infrastructure of the RNC in order to support the ideals the party unfortunately betrayed while it held power. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ed Morrissey:  Steele evokes Ronald Reagan, as so many do, in hearkening back to the principles that transformed the Republican Party into a force for liberty and reform. We’re fortunate to have both Steele and Gingrich to guide us out of the wilderness in this fashion, but Steele may represent the future of the party better than Gingrich as the head of the GOP in the next few years. I look forward to hearing more from both as to their vision on revamping the technological infrastructure of the RNC in order to support the ideals the party unfortunately betrayed while it held power. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeA</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/11/steele-the-way-back/comment-page-1/#comment-1635642</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=34085#comment-1635642</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;We have reached a point in the history of this country where the advocates of freedom and liberty may have to suffer a violent trial-by-fire unseen since the Civil War to right the sinking ship-of-state. Put yourself in the place of a liberty-loving German who just witnessed the election of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party in Germany in 1932. What would you do if the Reichstag was burning and Kristallnacht had just exploded? There are just two choices left to us now; submit or resist. And neither Gingrich nor Steele can be expected to do anything but meekly submit.

blackelkspeaks on November 11, 2008 at 2:38 PM 
If Obama creates the ‘national security force’ yes it is a resist situation. There would be NO doubts what his intentions are. But, let’s give it our best shot to rebuild and do it right and be patient. Ignoring the communist connection, the next 4 years is the GOP’s “Long March”.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
The solution is to do both. We need to be rebuilding a party that has a chance of at least controling the leftward drift, but at the same time being prepared to resist, no revolt is the word, if they make moves to get things far enough along to remove the means for resistance. If Obama builds his KGB, it will be too late. The revolution must come before they disarm us and and outnumber us. Armed men are citizens; disarmed men are subjects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>We have reached a point in the history of this country where the advocates of freedom and liberty may have to suffer a violent trial-by-fire unseen since the Civil War to right the sinking ship-of-state. Put yourself in the place of a liberty-loving German who just witnessed the election of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party in Germany in 1932. What would you do if the Reichstag was burning and Kristallnacht had just exploded? There are just two choices left to us now; submit or resist. And neither Gingrich nor Steele can be expected to do anything but meekly submit.</p>
<p>blackelkspeaks on November 11, 2008 at 2:38 PM<br />
If Obama creates the ‘national security force’ yes it is a resist situation. There would be NO doubts what his intentions are. But, let’s give it our best shot to rebuild and do it right and be patient. Ignoring the communist connection, the next 4 years is the GOP’s “Long March”.
</p></blockquote>
<p>The solution is to do both. We need to be rebuilding a party that has a chance of at least controling the leftward drift, but at the same time being prepared to resist, no revolt is the word, if they make moves to get things far enough along to remove the means for resistance. If Obama builds his KGB, it will be too late. The revolution must come before they disarm us and and outnumber us. Armed men are citizens; disarmed men are subjects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Macklin</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/11/steele-the-way-back/comment-page-1/#comment-1635627</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Macklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=34085#comment-1635627</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;... how we’ll make their families more prosperous, their children better educated, their parents more secure, and all of us healthier, safer and stronger.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Unless that how is get the government the hell out of the way, this is just more of the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8230; how we’ll make their families more prosperous, their children better educated, their parents more secure, and all of us healthier, safer and stronger.</p></blockquote>
<p>Unless that how is get the government the hell out of the way, this is just more of the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul1149</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/11/steele-the-way-back/comment-page-1/#comment-1635478</link>
		<dc:creator>paul1149</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=34085#comment-1635478</guid>
		<description>I favor Steele. Gingrich is brilliant, but has baggage. Steele has none, and would be a new voice, something we seriously need. Both have vision. Give it to Steele.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I favor Steele. Gingrich is brilliant, but has baggage. Steele has none, and would be a new voice, something we seriously need. Both have vision. Give it to Steele.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack_in_the_box</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/11/steele-the-way-back/comment-page-1/#comment-1635467</link>
		<dc:creator>jack_in_the_box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=34085#comment-1635467</guid>
		<description>how about &quot;make people realize&quot;

The Democrats believe in public housing for ALL.  That way we&#039;d all be equal.

The Democrats continue their tradition of slavery through social programs designed to take away a persons motivation to excel.  The Master has been replaced by the social worker delving out the rations to 100 families at near or below poverty level, while driving a luxury car and living in a fine home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how about &#8220;make people realize&#8221;</p>
<p>The Democrats believe in public housing for ALL.  That way we&#8217;d all be equal.</p>
<p>The Democrats continue their tradition of slavery through social programs designed to take away a persons motivation to excel.  The Master has been replaced by the social worker delving out the rations to 100 families at near or below poverty level, while driving a luxury car and living in a fine home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScottMcC</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/11/steele-the-way-back/comment-page-1/#comment-1635445</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottMcC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=34085#comment-1635445</guid>
		<description>Who here has actually met and talked with Steele? Show of hands...

Okay, I have. Believe me, you want that guy in charge of the RNC.

Newt will be of more value cranking out Contract with America-type solutions for clean energy, health care, education, and taxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who here has actually met and talked with Steele? Show of hands&#8230;</p>
<p>Okay, I have. Believe me, you want that guy in charge of the RNC.</p>
<p>Newt will be of more value cranking out Contract with America-type solutions for clean energy, health care, education, and taxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrye</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/11/steele-the-way-back/comment-page-1/#comment-1635437</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=34085#comment-1635437</guid>
		<description>Steele is right about one thing: Republicans need to make believe that they reflect the needs and values of ordinary people looking for a better life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steele is right about one thing: Republicans need to make believe that they reflect the needs and values of ordinary people looking for a better life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack_in_the_box</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/11/steele-the-way-back/comment-page-1/#comment-1635426</link>
		<dc:creator>jack_in_the_box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=34085#comment-1635426</guid>
		<description>Embryonic stemcell research is close to what the Japanese did in human testing pre and during WWII.  Amazing results, but sold its soul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Embryonic stemcell research is close to what the Japanese did in human testing pre and during WWII.  Amazing results, but sold its soul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack_in_the_box</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/11/steele-the-way-back/comment-page-1/#comment-1635423</link>
		<dc:creator>jack_in_the_box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=34085#comment-1635423</guid>
		<description>After Obama appoints radical leftist to the U.S. Supreme Court to replace some of the ultra-leftist who will now retire,  most rational, yes even California voted socially conservative, people would vote for someone who will appoint conservative Justices to safeguard life and marriage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After Obama appoints radical leftist to the U.S. Supreme Court to replace some of the ultra-leftist who will now retire,  most rational, yes even California voted socially conservative, people would vote for someone who will appoint conservative Justices to safeguard life and marriage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack_in_the_box</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/11/steele-the-way-back/comment-page-1/#comment-1635419</link>
		<dc:creator>jack_in_the_box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=34085#comment-1635419</guid>
		<description>Also smaller gov&#039;t and less spending is no longer a Republican principle. Oh, sure, it SHOULD be, but after the last 12 years of runaway spending by the Republican controlled House AND Senate. I would only laughed at McCain trying to say he would reign in anything when he never stood up &quot;made people famous&quot; during all his time in the Senate before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also smaller gov&#8217;t and less spending is no longer a Republican principle. Oh, sure, it SHOULD be, but after the last 12 years of runaway spending by the Republican controlled House AND Senate. I would only laughed at McCain trying to say he would reign in anything when he never stood up &#8220;made people famous&#8221; during all his time in the Senate before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack_in_the_box</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/11/steele-the-way-back/comment-page-1/#comment-1635413</link>
		<dc:creator>jack_in_the_box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=34085#comment-1635413</guid>
		<description>Term limits for congress, 6 terms for the House and 2 for Senators is a winnning issue. Too bad the Republican party abandoned that part of the &quot;Contract&quot; back when it took power in &#039;94.   I don&#039;t want to hear what anyone tried either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Term limits for congress, 6 terms for the House and 2 for Senators is a winnning issue. Too bad the Republican party abandoned that part of the &#8220;Contract&#8221; back when it took power in &#8216;94.   I don&#8217;t want to hear what anyone tried either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack_in_the_box</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/11/steele-the-way-back/comment-page-1/#comment-1635409</link>
		<dc:creator>jack_in_the_box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=34085#comment-1635409</guid>
		<description>Gingrich would be great too.  I prefer Steele.  Either way the social conservative wing, Prolife and Protradional Marriage is the cornerstone of Republican party&#039;s ability to win back the opportunity to govern.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gingrich would be great too.  I prefer Steele.  Either way the social conservative wing, Prolife and Protradional Marriage is the cornerstone of Republican party&#8217;s ability to win back the opportunity to govern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sapwolf</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/11/steele-the-way-back/comment-page-1/#comment-1635342</link>
		<dc:creator>Sapwolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=34085#comment-1635342</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;We have reached a point in the history of this country where the advocates of freedom and liberty may have to suffer a violent trial-by-fire unseen since the Civil War to right the sinking ship-of-state. Put yourself in the place of a liberty-loving German who just witnessed the election of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party in Germany in 1932. What would you do if the Reichstag was burning and Kristallnacht had just exploded? There are just two choices left to us now; submit or resist. And neither Gingrich nor Steele can be expected to do anything but meekly submit.

blackelkspeaks on November 11, 2008 at 2:38 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If Obama creates the &#039;national security force&#039; yes it is a resist situation.  There would be NO doubts what his intentions are.  But, let&#039;s give it our best shot to rebuild and do it right and be patient.  Ignoring the communist connection,  the next 4 years is the GOP&#039;s &quot;Long March&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>We have reached a point in the history of this country where the advocates of freedom and liberty may have to suffer a violent trial-by-fire unseen since the Civil War to right the sinking ship-of-state. Put yourself in the place of a liberty-loving German who just witnessed the election of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party in Germany in 1932. What would you do if the Reichstag was burning and Kristallnacht had just exploded? There are just two choices left to us now; submit or resist. And neither Gingrich nor Steele can be expected to do anything but meekly submit.</p>
<p>blackelkspeaks on November 11, 2008 at 2:38 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>If Obama creates the &#8216;national security force&#8217; yes it is a resist situation.  There would be NO doubts what his intentions are.  But, let&#8217;s give it our best shot to rebuild and do it right and be patient.  Ignoring the communist connection,  the next 4 years is the GOP&#8217;s &#8220;Long March&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sapwolf</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/11/steele-the-way-back/comment-page-1/#comment-1635324</link>
		<dc:creator>Sapwolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=34085#comment-1635324</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Please, you Gingrich people, get with the program. Michael Steele would make a magnificent GOP Chairman. He’s right on the issues, very libertarian. But more importantly, he’s got the right image, which Gingrich does not.

If this election taught us Rightwingers (conservatives and libertarians), anything, it’s that image does matter!

We need to desperately “hip-ize” the GOP. And Steele is the perfect choice to do this.

ericdondero on November 11, 2008 at 12:25 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree.  However, I want Gingrich in there off the camera working with others on policy formation.  We need both of these guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Please, you Gingrich people, get with the program. Michael Steele would make a magnificent GOP Chairman. He’s right on the issues, very libertarian. But more importantly, he’s got the right image, which Gingrich does not.</p>
<p>If this election taught us Rightwingers (conservatives and libertarians), anything, it’s that image does matter!</p>
<p>We need to desperately “hip-ize” the GOP. And Steele is the perfect choice to do this.</p>
<p>ericdondero on November 11, 2008 at 12:25 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree.  However, I want Gingrich in there off the camera working with others on policy formation.  We need both of these guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kokonut</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/11/steele-the-way-back/comment-page-1/#comment-1635320</link>
		<dc:creator>Kokonut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=34085#comment-1635320</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://myprezbw.blogspot.com/2008/11/ronald-reagan-made-it-cool-to-be.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Ronald Reagan made it cool to be a Republican, for God&#039;s sake.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; - Michael Steele.

He does seem to evoke the qualities of Ronald Reagan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://myprezbw.blogspot.com/2008/11/ronald-reagan-made-it-cool-to-be.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Ronald Reagan made it cool to be a Republican, for God&#8217;s sake.&#8221;</a> &#8211; Michael Steele.</p>
<p>He does seem to evoke the qualities of Ronald Reagan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Constant Parrhesia</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/11/steele-the-way-back/comment-page-1/#comment-1635315</link>
		<dc:creator>Constant Parrhesia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=34085#comment-1635315</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
 “hip-ize” the GOP. 
ericdondero on November 11, 2008 at 12:25 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

LOL. Irony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
 “hip-ize” the GOP.<br />
ericdondero on November 11, 2008 at 12:25 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>LOL. Irony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thebrokenrattle</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/11/steele-the-way-back/comment-page-1/#comment-1635283</link>
		<dc:creator>thebrokenrattle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=34085#comment-1635283</guid>
		<description>I voted for a black man, but it was Lynn Swann.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I voted for a black man, but it was Lynn Swann.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajacksonian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/11/steele-the-way-back/comment-page-1/#comment-1635264</link>
		<dc:creator>ajacksonian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=34085#comment-1635264</guid>
		<description>I like Newt, quite a bit.  He has a problem: he is a &#039;reformer&#039; and his idea of &#039;well, this is going to happen anyway so we might as well try to go along with it&#039; does not offer a contrast in ideology.  He wants that on GW, or did, at least, and that points out that working &#039;inside the beltway&#039; ends you up believing that what happens inside DC is paramount.  Which is just what the D party believes.  That has gotten us that lovely class of folks that came in with the Contract with America expanding government, broadening its scope and reach and generally being unable to state why smaller government that can actually do its job is good for America.  Newt didn&#039;t bring home the goods, or else we wouldn&#039;t be in this position of figuring out just where the R party &#039;lost its way&#039;.  Newt got his majority... and it is now *where*, exactly?

I like Mr. Steele who ran a good and innovative campaign in MD that I got to see from the VA side of things.  He has a good, basic message and the party will have to find one and *stick to it*.  May I suggest that trying &#039;reformer&#039; this last campaign and running a fixture of DC at the top of the ticket really didn&#039;t say &#039;reform&#039;?  The R party has a number of good people out in the States and if it wants to offer a non-DC oriented position to start cutting back on government, then that basic message needs to be the lead.  If you believe that the States really are the best place to figure things out, then getting abortion back to the States and trying to fix things *there* and keep it out of the hands of a SCOTUS that will be more liberal after 4 years is something you will *want* to do.  If you do believe that local communities are set up better to handle education, then getting federal rules and regulations *out* of that is necessary.  And maybe, just maybe, getting a party that agrees that its elected members will push for a 5 day workweek for *itself* in elected office, might just start to &lt;a href=&quot;http://ajacksonian.blogspot.com/2008/11/easing-out-conservative-elite.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;demonstrate some of those &#039;conservative values&#039;&lt;/a&gt; that always seem to wind up in only one or two topics?  Because the current Congress gets 4 day weekends... plus long vacations, and that is neither conservative nor representative of the American people.  It stinks of acquiescent elitism.

That sort of agenda requires hard work and thought to carry through and make sure that a lean, basic and sturdy party platform that *every* candidate will run on is put forward.  And mean it.  If I want to vote for slackers, I will vote the D party, thanks... I&#039;ve run out of parties to vote for and very few people that I can support politically.  It can&#039;t be done in two years... but in four you can have a very good contrast with the way things will have been run for four years and give an idea that you just might have an alternative to more, bigger, fatter and more powerful government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Newt, quite a bit.  He has a problem: he is a &#8216;reformer&#8217; and his idea of &#8216;well, this is going to happen anyway so we might as well try to go along with it&#8217; does not offer a contrast in ideology.  He wants that on GW, or did, at least, and that points out that working &#8216;inside the beltway&#8217; ends you up believing that what happens inside DC is paramount.  Which is just what the D party believes.  That has gotten us that lovely class of folks that came in with the Contract with America expanding government, broadening its scope and reach and generally being unable to state why smaller government that can actually do its job is good for America.  Newt didn&#8217;t bring home the goods, or else we wouldn&#8217;t be in this position of figuring out just where the R party &#8216;lost its way&#8217;.  Newt got his majority&#8230; and it is now *where*, exactly?</p>
<p>I like Mr. Steele who ran a good and innovative campaign in MD that I got to see from the VA side of things.  He has a good, basic message and the party will have to find one and *stick to it*.  May I suggest that trying &#8216;reformer&#8217; this last campaign and running a fixture of DC at the top of the ticket really didn&#8217;t say &#8216;reform&#8217;?  The R party has a number of good people out in the States and if it wants to offer a non-DC oriented position to start cutting back on government, then that basic message needs to be the lead.  If you believe that the States really are the best place to figure things out, then getting abortion back to the States and trying to fix things *there* and keep it out of the hands of a SCOTUS that will be more liberal after 4 years is something you will *want* to do.  If you do believe that local communities are set up better to handle education, then getting federal rules and regulations *out* of that is necessary.  And maybe, just maybe, getting a party that agrees that its elected members will push for a 5 day workweek for *itself* in elected office, might just start to <a href="http://ajacksonian.blogspot.com/2008/11/easing-out-conservative-elite.html" rel="nofollow">demonstrate some of those &#8216;conservative values&#8217;</a> that always seem to wind up in only one or two topics?  Because the current Congress gets 4 day weekends&#8230; plus long vacations, and that is neither conservative nor representative of the American people.  It stinks of acquiescent elitism.</p>
<p>That sort of agenda requires hard work and thought to carry through and make sure that a lean, basic and sturdy party platform that *every* candidate will run on is put forward.  And mean it.  If I want to vote for slackers, I will vote the D party, thanks&#8230; I&#8217;ve run out of parties to vote for and very few people that I can support politically.  It can&#8217;t be done in two years&#8230; but in four you can have a very good contrast with the way things will have been run for four years and give an idea that you just might have an alternative to more, bigger, fatter and more powerful government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eh</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/11/steele-the-way-back/comment-page-1/#comment-1635242</link>
		<dc:creator>eh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=34085#comment-1635242</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;We must articulate a positive vision for America’s future that speaks to Americans’ hopes, concerns and needs. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

&quot;&#039;e&#039;s a liberal!!! he didn&#039;t say nothin&#039; about god or the amero in there!!!!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>We must articulate a positive vision for America’s future that speaks to Americans’ hopes, concerns and needs. </p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;&#8216;e&#8217;s a liberal!!! he didn&#8217;t say nothin&#8217; about god or the amero in there!!!!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
