AIG still throwing lavish parties with your money
posted at 8:15 am on November 11, 2008 by Ed Morrissey
Want to know what an insurance company does with a brand-new bailout check of $150 billion in taxpayer money? Throw a big party, of course! AIG execs only had one rule for their big shindig in Phoenix this week — don’t mention the name AIG:
In addition to the nearly 150 independent financial planners in Phoenix for training and education, the conference attendee list was a Who’s Who of AIG leaders, including Larry Roth, President & CEO, AIG Advisor Group; Art Tambaro, President & CEO, Royal Alliance Associates; Mark Schlafly, President & CEO, FSC Securities; Gary Bender, Senior Vice President, Investment Advisory Services; Bruce Levitus, Senior Vice President, Investment Advisory Services; and Stuart Rogers, Senior Vice President.
The ABC15 Investigators went undercover at the resort and found AIG executives having poolside meetings while drinking coffee and working out at the spa while other attendees were in conference rooms for seminars.
We also watched as half a dozen of the executives went to dinner at McCormick & Schmick’s at the Camelback Esplanade, racking up a bill of more than $400 for drinks, appetizers, and meals.
AIG execs did cut back on the splashy seminar. They cut Terry Bradshaw from the agenda. Bradshaw, one of the NFL’s greatest quarterbacks and a four-time Super Bowl winner, gets $40,000 per appearance as a motivational speaker. Maybe Congress ought to pay Bradshaw the money instead, to motivate themselves into cutting off bailout money to hearty partiers like AIG.
Actually, AIG told ABC that Bradshaw’s fee would come from product sponsors. They also claimed that all but $23,000 of the $343,000 bill would get underwritten by sponsors. If that’s true, then why cancel Bradshaw at the last minute? And if that’s true, then why all of the anonymity?
A hotel employee told ABC15, “We can’t even say the word [AIG].”
Sounds like AIG knew it had something to hide.
If we’re footing the bill for this company’s management failures, then we should be seeing them cut costs to the bone. That means training gets done in the most efficient way possible, and not through costly junkets at resort hotels like Squaw Peak. Having lived in Phoenix, I know that is a high-end destination. If they have to travel at all, let them stay at Days Inn, or some other less expensive digs.
These execs came to taxpayers, hat in hand, demanding assistance. It doesn’t appear that AIG needs any. When they start acting like they’re bankrupt, I’ll believe them.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
some companies should fail. AIG is one of them.
blish on November 11, 2008 at 12:34 PM
Sure, some companies should fail. Many companies should fail. But do you want a company you’ve just invested in (by force or otherwise) to fail?
DarkCurrent on November 11, 2008 at 12:38 PM
If it can’t function without wasting money on spa retreats and large bonuses to executives who were so incompetent that they needed this bailout in the first place, then yes, we should give it the death penalty and choke it to death.
Esthier on November 11, 2008 at 1:04 PM
I want to see some heads roll
Greenhelmet on November 11, 2008 at 1:12 PM
No bonuses should be paid, but this thread isn’t about bonuses.
This so-called “party” sounds like a sales event typical of the industry (I’m not in the industry so I could well be wrong). If that’s the case and is indeed required to be competetive, why are we complaining? On the other hand, I guess this is why we shouldn’t nationalize companies/industries in the first place. We as a group (the tax-paying new owners) generally don’t have a clue as to how to manage our investment.
DarkCurrent on November 11, 2008 at 1:19 PM
These executives should loose ALL of their personal assets to pay back the tax payers………. ALL of their assets.
Seven Percent Solution on November 11, 2008 at 1:29 PM
“Parties” are necessary. Expensive ones are not.
As I said earlier, everyone in the world knows AIG’s situation. Throwing lavish parties to pretend they’re not the beggars they are does nothing for them except cause the sentiment seen in Greenhelmet’s comment.
Esthier on November 11, 2008 at 1:31 PM
These AIG officers are Noonan, Brooks, Buckley people.
They are not “Sarah’s People”.
Sapwolf on November 11, 2008 at 1:36 PM
Is there anyone on this planet who believes we’ve seen the last of AIG’s “requests” for more money confiscated from U.S. citizens? Anyone? Bueller?
Bugler on November 11, 2008 at 2:14 PM
Hmmm…no takers. We’re agreed, then: AIG will be back for more. Next question: When they do come back for more, on what basis could the government possibly refuse them? If they were “too big to fail” when they got $40B and they were “too big to fail” when they got another $150B, won’t they still be “too big to fail” when they come back for half a trillion?
Bugler on November 11, 2008 at 2:42 PM
I spelled out my reasoning, Bugler. Feel free to address those points, rather than just snipe.
Jaibones on November 11, 2008 at 3:22 PM
Well said.
Disagree, canopfor. There is only one issue for us to be concerned – how quickly does AIG recover their stability, repay the loans, and learn the painful lessons of this mortgage market.
The rest of this is populist silliness.
No. It’s not. It’s nothing like that at all.
Jaibones on November 11, 2008 at 3:31 PM
There it is – welcome to Enlightenment France! Good grief.
Jaibones on November 11, 2008 at 3:33 PM
Yep, me too. And Revolutionary France did have a few good ideas – they managed to rid society of a great many bouches inutiles….
Venusian Visitor on November 11, 2008 at 5:02 PM
No, this has nothing to do with lavish spas in general. This has to do with lavish spas and a company that should be bankrupt and would be without our money.
There is no reason in the world why they couldn’t keep a low radar and do business somewhere that doesn’t cost thousands of dollars. As I’ve said repeatedly, the whole world knows their economic situation. This isn’t about keeping up a front.
It’s more like Cinderella getting a dress made out of the same material used to make clothes for the naked emperor.
If AIG is a business that can be saved, then customers will be willing to meet them without being bribed into it with a nice resort.
Esthier on November 11, 2008 at 5:13 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2