If the government is good enough to crash planes into the World Trade Center, it should be easy to get rid of a few individuals that nobody really wants around. /s

Move them to Chicago. Maybe the Gitmo detainees will all get shot. Game over.

Or drop them in Phillie wearing McCain/Palin tee-shirts.

tom on November 10, 2008 at 3:13 PM
Cool tom thank you

jacobnyc on November 10, 2008 at 2:27 PM

But, why should our Country, The Greatest worry about what other Countries say and do? Look at how their Countries are. I don’t worry about that. I don’t care about what other Countries say or think about US. That is cowing down to the Liberal’s point of view. I won’t do that. Gitmo is very plush place. They get very well taken care of. My cousin was stationed there for a while. Things happen, and war is not pretty.

It was our excess of decency that bothered to spare them.

But, rather than endanger our land, they should finally get the fatal justice they first deserved.

And then close Gitmo’s prison… because no more illegal enemy combatants will be captured or sent anywhere… thanks to the hysterical political machinations of the seditious opposition and the un-Constitutional over-reaching of the suicidally-naive Supreme Court.

Who have joined together to force us to take no prisoners for our own future security.

John Bibb

Well, I guess they could turn them loose and then hunt them down and shoot them. That is probably legal.

Oh, that’s a FINE idea!!! We haven’t been hit since 9/11, but let’s just ship a whole crapload of terrorists here, incarcerate them smack dab in the middle of the United States – and THEN see what their buds will do to get them out?

The detainees at Gitmo are prisoners of war, not domestic criminals. Those terrorists are treated so well in our hands that they’d certainly prefer the treatment they get in Gitmo to anything in their native countries.

Why the hell do they want to close the center anyway? You’d think Obama would just want to expand it, for American political prisoners!

Will the Supreme Court that rejected military tribunals twice allow the creation of a separate-but-somehow-equal civil court system for detainees?

Give or take a few new SCJs, yes.

I smell tyranny.

I doubt the America public will care very much. The public has lost interest and won’t regain interest until the next major terrorist attack on US soil.

I’m only partially joking with this post – but also wanted to bring up the point that this not only raises important questions about what to do with the current prisoners we have but what should are operational strategy on the ground be from here on out if capturing most anyone is an act of futility?